Abstract
The effect of spinal cord compression identified with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), on neurological prognosis, was retrospectively evaluated in 36 patients with acute spinal cord injury. Of the 21 patients without cord compression, 16 had potentially reversible injury (normal spinal cord or cord oedema), all having functional recovery.
Of the 15 patients with cord compression, 3 had operative decompression. In the 12 patients who did not undergo surgery, the degree of recovery was directly related to the magnitude of spinal cord compression, only one of the patients with moderate or marked cord compression having useful motor function at follow up. In contrast, the 3 patients with surgical decompression had at least 2 grades of improvement, all having functional recovery. These findings raise the possibility that MRI may be used to identify a patient group who will benefit from surgical decompression. A numerical index is proposed to prospectively identify patients for surgical decompression, and further studies are underway to evaluate this.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Bohlman H H (1976) Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine: an analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg 61(A): 119–142.
Janssen L, Hansebout R R (1989) Pathogenesis of spinal cord injury and newer treatments. A review. Spine 14: 23–32.
Wilmot C B, Hall K M (1986) Evaluation of the acute management of tetraplegia: conservative versus surgical treatment. Paraplegia 24: 148–153.
Bracken M B, Shepard M J, Collins W F, Holford T R, Young W, Baskin el al (1990) A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med 322: 1405–1411.
Geisler F H, Dorsey F C, Coleman W P (1990) Recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury - a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med 324: 1829–1838.
Frankel H L, Hancock D D, Hyslop G, Malzak J, Michaelis L S, Ungar G H et al (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 7: 179–192.
Takahashi M, Sakomoto Y, Miyawaki M, Bussaka H (1987) Increased MR signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression. Neuroradiology 29: 550–556.
Flanders A E, Schaefer D M, Doan H T, Mishkin M M, Gonzales C F, Flanders A E et al (1977) Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177: 25–33.
Kulkarni M V, Bondurant F J, Rose S L, Narayana P A (1988) 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of acute spinal trauma. Radiographics 8: 1059–1082.
Mirvis S E, Geisler F H, Jelinek, Gellad F et al Acute cervical spine trauma: evaluation with 1.5 T MR imaging. Radiology 166: 807–816.
Kerslake R W, Jaspan T, Worthington B S (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal trauma. BJR 64: 386–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silberstein, M., Brown, U., Tress, B. et al. Suggested MRI criteria for surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury. Preliminary observations. Spinal Cord 30, 704–710 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1992.137
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1992.137
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Acute spinal cord injury: Clinical aspects and magnetic resonance imaging
Emergency Radiology (1994)