Introduction

A hallmark of correlated transition metal oxides (TMOs) is a prominent cross-coupling between the electronic charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom. The concomitant rich physics emerges as a promising perspective for novel electronic devices for transistors1,2,3, energy harvesting4,5,6, or information storage and processing7,8,9 including quantum computing. A promising strategy to develop new functionalities is to work with materials at the verge of a phase transition. For Mott insulators, this defines the field of Mottronics. This approach is especially suitable for the functionalization of giant conductivity variations across the metal-insulator transition (MIT)10,11, with the change driven by various mechanisms such as structural distortions12, substrate-induced strain13, thickness14,15, and bias11, as well as for the switching of the spin order between different magnetic ground states9,16.

CaMnO3 belongs to a vast class of perovskite oxides, which are insulating due to strong electronic Coulomb repulsion. It relaxes into an orthorhombically distorted structure due to the strain induced by the different ionic radii of the Ca and Mn cations, consistently with its tolerance factor t = (rCa + rO)/2(rMn + rO) = 0.74 in the range of orthorhombic distortions17, while electron-spin coupling stabilizes a G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM) order18,19. Unlike in many perovskite oxides15,18,20, minute doping of CaMnO3 can induce a sharp transition to a metallic state. The critical electron concentration ne for metallicity is in the low 1020 cm−3 range21, which exceeds the values typical of classical semiconductors by two orders of magnitude but does not introduce any significant disorder or structural changes. Ce4+ doping at the Ca2+ site, bringing two additional electrons per formula unit, pushes the Fermi level EF into the conduction band. The consequent mixed Mn3+/Mn4+ valence state accounts for electronic properties and magnetic ground state driven by the interplay of electron itinerancy due to double exchange interaction with polaronic self-localization22,23,24,25. This compound thus appears as an ideal platform to explore the effects of electron doping on the interaction of electrons with collective degrees of freedom22,23,24,25.

Here, by doping CaMnO3 (CMO) with only 2 and 4% Ce (CCMO2 and CCMO4), we explore the nature of charge carriers emerging at the early stages of band filling inducing the transition from the insulating to a metallic state. We use for this purpose angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES), which directly visualizes the electronic band structure and the one-electron spectral function A(k,ω), reflecting many-body effects of electron coupling with other electrons and bosonic excitations. Our results show that the doping of CMO forms a system of dichotomic charge carriers, where three-dimensional (3D) light electrons, weakly coupled to the lattice, coexist with quasi-two-dimensional (q2D) heavy strongly coupled polarons. The latter form due to a boost of the electron–phonon interaction (EPI) on the verge of MIT where the occupied bandwidth stays comparable with the phonon energy. As in CCMO the energy scale of all elementary electronic and magnetic excitations is well separated from that of phonons, it gives us a unique opportunity to single out the EPI-specific effect. We argue that the EPI-boost scenario is universal for the MITs in other oxides.

Results

Theoretical electronic structure overview

We start with the analysis of the overall electronic structure of the parent CMO suggested by ab initio calculations (see also Supplementary Note 1). The relaxed orthorhombic structure of this material is shown in Fig. 1a together with the corresponding Brillouin zone (BZ) in comparison to that of the ideal cubic lattice in Fig. 1b. The calculations confirm that the spin ground state of CMO adopts the G-type AFM order18,19,26. The calculated density of states, projected on the orbital contribution of Mn for the two sublattices (Fig. 1c), indicates that the valence states of CMO derive mostly from the half-filled t2g orbitals while the empty conduction states are a combination of eg and t2g derived states. The calculated band structure as a function of binding energy EB = E − EF and momentum k is shown in Fig. 1d, schematically depicting the eg and t2g orbitals. In this plot EF is rigidly shifted according to the doping level. Already the low Ce-doping in CCMO2 pushes EF above the conduction band (CB) minimum and starts populating the electronic states having predominantly the Mn eg x2y2 character (Fig. 1c). The increase of doping to 4% continues populating the CB-states. Figure 1e shows the theoretical Fermi surface (FS) unfolded to the cubic pseudo-cell BZ, which consists of 3D electron spheres around the Γ point formed by the eg 3z2 − r2 and x2 − y2 orbitals, and q2D electron cylinders along the ΓX and ΓZ directions formed by the eg x2 − y2 orbitals (Supplementary Fig. 1). Such manifold is characteristic of perovskites15,20. The FS cuts in the ΓMX plane are shown in Fig. 1f for the two doping levels.

Fig. 1: Theoretical electronic structure of CaCeMnO3 (CCMO) upon doping.
figure 1

a Density functional theory -relaxed orthorhombically distorted lattice of CaMnO3 (CMO). b The Brillouin zone (BZ) of the distorted lattice inscribed into that of the undistorted cubic pseudo-cell. c Electronic density of states of CMO projected onto two Mn atoms with antiparallel spins. d Bandstructure and rigid shift of the Fermi energy EF corresponding to 2% (red) and 4% doping (blue). e Theoretical Fermi surface (FS) unfolded to the cubic pseudo-cell BZ. f Calculated FS cuts in the ΓMX plane for the 2% Ce-doped, CCMO2 (green lines) and 4% Ce-doped, CCMO4 (blue), where the doping increases the Luttinger volume.

Experimental electronic structure under doping

We will now discuss the experimental electronic structure of CCMO at different doping levels. Our Ca1−xCexMnO3 samples (x = 2, 4% nominal Ce concentrations) were 20 nm thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition on the YAlO3 (001) substrates (for details see section Methods: Sample growth). Our experiment (see section Methods: SX-ARPES experiment) used soft-X-ray photons (SX-ARPES) with energy hv of few hundreds of eV which enable sharp resolution of out-of-plane electron momentum kz and thereby full 3D momentum k27,28 as essential for the inherently 3D electronic structure of CCMO. The measurements were carried out at the SX-ARPES endstation29 of the ADRESS beamline at the Swiss Light Source30 using circularly polarized incident X-rays. Figure 2a, b present the experimental FS maps of CCMO2 and CCMO4 measured as a function of in-plane (kx,ky)-momentum near the kz = 8(2π/a) plane ΓXM of the cubic pseudo-cell BZ (Fig. 1b). These measurements were performed with hv = 643 eV which pushes the probing depth in the 3.5 nm range31 and increases signal from the Mn 3d states by a factor of 2–3 by their resonant excitation through the Mn 2p core levels (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3). Simultaneously, it sets kz close to the Γ-point of the BZ as evidenced by the experimental FS map as a function of (kx,kz)-momentum in Fig. 2c. The trajectory of the 643 eV energy in the k-space is sketched for clarity in Fig. 2d. In agreement with the theoretical FS in Fig. 1e, the experiment distinctly shows the eg 3z2 − r2 derived 3D electron spheres around the Γ-points and eg x2 − y2 derived q2D electron cylinders extending along ΓX. The experimental results are reproduced by the theoretical FS contours calculated for the 2% and 4% doping levels in Fig. 1f, although they slightly underestimate the Fermi vector kF. The orthorhombic lattice distortion manifests itself in the experimental FS maps as replicas of the 3D spheres repeating every (π/a, π/a) point of the cubic pseudo cell, and q2D cylinders every (π/a, 0) and (0, π/a) point. These replicas are analogous to the SX-ARPES data for the rhombohedrally distorted La1−xSrxMnO320.

Fig. 2: Experimental electronic structure of CaCeMnO3 (CCMO).
figure 2

a, b Out-of-plane Fermi surface (FS) maps in the ΓXM plane for the 2% Ce-doped sample—CCMO2 (a) and 4% Ce-doped—CCMO4 (b) measured with hv at the Mn 2p resonance. The white square designates the cubic pseudo-cell surface Brillouin zone (BZ). The doping clearly increases the experimental Luttinger volume. c Out-of-plane FS map for CCMO2 in the ΓZR plane recorded under variation of hv. d Sketch of the 643 eV line cutting the Γ8 point in the second BZ in k|| and the trajectory of the 643 eV energy in the k-space.

The electron densities embedded in the 3D spheres and q2D cylinders, n3D and nq2D respectively are compiled in Table 1. These were obtained from the Luttinger volumes VL of the corresponding FS pockets determined from the experimental kF values. The latter are determined from the gradient of the ARPES intensity32 integrated through the whole occupied bandwidth. This method was used because of its robustness to many-body effects and experimental resolution. Comparison of the experimental FS maps for CCMO2 and CCMO4 in Fig. 2a, b, respectively, shows clear increase of VL and thus electron density with doping for both 3D spheres and q2D cylinders. This is particularly clear for the cuts of the 3D spheres around the Γi,j points which develop from small filled circles to larger open ones. We note that n3D increases much more with doping than nq2D.

Table 1 Electron density for the three dimensional and quasi-two dimensional bands deduced from angle resolved phtoelectron spectroscopy data.

Weakly coupled electrons in 3D bands

We will now analyse the experimental band dispersions E(k) and spectral functions A(k,ω), and demonstrate that the 3D and q2D bands provide charge carriers having totally different nature. First, we focus on the former derived from the 3z2 − r2 eg-orbitals. Their kx-dispersions along the ΓX-direction of the bulk BZ marked in Fig. 2a, b (cut “A”) are visualized by the ARPES intensity images for the CCMO2 (d) and CCMO4 (f) samples (for band structure data through an extended k-space region see Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). The ARPES dispersions confirm the picture of doping-dependent band filling. They are shown overlaid with the DFT-calculated bands slightly shifted to match the experimental kF, assuming deviations from the nominal doping of at most 25%33.

Perovskite oxides are systems where a coupling of the electrons with various bosonic excitations such as plasmons34 or phonons35,36 is expected, further translating in band renormalization and modifications of the electron effective mass m* and mobility. In search of bosonic coupling signatures, we evaluated maxima of the ARPES energy-distribution curves (EDCs), shown in Fig. 3a, b as filled circles. The raw data are presented in Supplementary Fig. 6 and data-processing details are in Supplementary Note 2. For CCMO2, these points follow a parabolic E(k) with m* ~0.35m0 (m0 is the free-electron mass) in agreement with the DFT predictions. With the increase of occupied bandwidth in CCMO4, the experimental points start deviating from the parabolic dispersion at EB = 80 ± 20 meV while approaching EF, and below this energy the experimental dispersion follows the same m* ~ 0.35m0. The parabolic fit of the region above EB is the green line in Fig. 3b. Such a dispersion discontinuity, or a kink, is a standard signature of weak electron-boson coupling. However, its quantitative analysis in terms of coupling strength suffers from the experimental statistics and possible admixture of the x2 − y2 eg band. Similar behavior in the CCMO2 data may be hidden behind smaller occupied bandwidth. The same feature is also identified based on the analysis of momentum-distribution curves (MDCs) in Supplementary Fig. 7.

Fig. 3: Bandstructure of CaCeMnO3.
figure 3

ad Band dispersions E(k) measured at the Mn 2p resonance for a, c 2% Ce-doped CCMO2 and b, d 4% Ce-doped CCMO4. E(k) of the 3D bands around the Γ-point (a, b) identifies light electron charge carriers. Blue arrow indicates the threshold energy of energy distribution curves (EDC) maxima deviating in CCMO4 from the parabolic dispersion. Angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES) images of the quasi-2D bands around ky = 0.5π/a (c, d) show massive humps extending down in binding energy (EB) which manifest heavy polaronic charge carriers. Also shown through (ad) are the overlaid density functional theory (DFT)-theoretical bands and gradients of the energy-integrated ARPES intensity, identifying the Fermi wavevector kF.; e, f Spectral function A(k,ω) EDC at kx = kF for the 3D bands (thin lines) and at ky = 0.5π/a for the q2D ones (thick lines) for CCMO2 (e) and CCMO4 (f). For the q2D bands, the whole A(k,ω) is dominated by the polaronic hump.

Which are the bosonic excitations which could manifest as the dispersion kink? One can rule out magnons because these excitations in the parent AFM-ordered CMO strongly couple to phonons37 but only marginally to electrons. Furthermore, inelastic neutron scattering experiments38 find the energy of magnons associated with the AFM spin orientations at ~20 meV that is well below the experimental kink energy. The magnons associated with weak FM due to canted AFM spin orientation3 of our CCMO samples grown under compressive strain will have yet smaller energy because the FM spin coupling is much weaker compared to the AFM one. Other bosonic candidates, plasmons, can also be excluded on the basis of their calculated energies (see Supplementary Fig. 8), which are almost an order of magnitude larger than the observed kink energy. In turn, the calculated energies ωph of phonons, which could show significant EPI matrix elements, are found to fall into the 50–80 meV energy range (see Supplementary Fig. 9) matching the experimental data. We therefore assign the kink to EPI. The presence of a kink in the dispersions suggests that the 3D-electrons stay in the weak-coupling regime of EPI, forming a subsystem of light charge carriers.

Strongly coupled polarons in quasi-2D bands

We now switch to the eg x2 − y2 derived q2D bands forming the FS cylinders. The ARPES images along kx-cuts of these cylinders marked in Fig. 2a, b (Cut “B”) are shown in Fig. 3c, d for CCMO2 and CCMO4, respectively, overlaid with the DFT-calculated bands. Surprisingly, the cuts do not reveal any well-defined bands but only humps of ARPES intensity falling down from the eg x2y2 dispersions. The experimental kF for CCMO2 and CCMO4, and the corresponding nq2D values compiled in Table 1 reveal that, importantly, nq2D exceeds n3D by roughly an order of magnitude.

Remarkably, the experimental A(k,ω) at kF, shown in Fig. 3e, f do not exhibit any notable quasi-particle (QP) peak but only a broad intensity hump extending down in EB. Such a spectral shape with vanishing QP weight is characteristic of electrons interacting very strongly with bosonic degrees of freedom, which form heavy charge carriers.

Based on the above analysis of the characteristic phonon frequencies in CCMO, these bosons should be associated with phonons interacting with electrons through strong EPI. Physically, in this case a moving electron drags behind it a strong lattice distortion—in other words, a phonon cloud—that fundamentally reduces mobility of such a compound charge carrier called polaron39,40. An overlap of different phonon modes (Supplementary Fig. 9) and their possible dispersion explains the experimentally observed absence of any well-defined structure of the hump. Tracking the occupied part of the q2D band, the hump is however confined in k-space. This fact rules out the defect-like small polarons, whose weight spreads out through the whole BZ, and suggests the picture of large polarons associated with a long-range lattice distortion41. The simultaneous manifestation of very strong EPI with the large-polaron dispersion points to long-range EPI41, while the absence of major modifications in the spectral function shape during temperature-dependent measurements (Supplementary Fig. 10) suggests that the phonons involved in the polaronic coupling have frequencies above ~20 meV. The polaron formation in CCMO bears resemblance to the better studied parent CMO19,22 where EPI is also associated with several phonon modes with frequencies ωph in the 50–80 meV range42. We note that while these previous works assumed a small polaron picture of the charge carriers in CMO23,24, our ARPES results suggest their large-polaron character. Our identification of the heavy polaronic charge carriers in the eg x2 − y2 bands is also supported by the doping dependence of the ARPES data in Fig. 3c, d: the increase of nq2D from CCMO2 to CCMO4 reduces the hump spectral density and shifts it upwards to the quasiparticle band, which indicates a decrease of the EPI strength. The dichotomy of the 3D and q2D carriers in terms of different EPI strengths, mobility and m* identified in the ARPES data should also be consistent with a transport model including two types of carriers, with radically different masses and mobilities.

Light and heavy electrons in transport

We will now examine how these findings translate into transport experiments performed for CCMO4 (Fig. 4) and show that, indeed, the Hall resistivity is consistent with a two band model combining the contribution of carriers with different effective masses and mobilities. This analysis has only been done for CCMO4 that remains metallic in the whole temperature range below Tc. In CCMO2, in contrast, a thermally activated behavior is found at low temperature, already suggesting carrier localization and/or strong temperature dependent enhancement of m*.

Fig. 4: Transport properties.
figure 4

Temperature dependence of resistivity for a 30 nm 4% doped CaMnO3 (CCMO4) sample, and its fit using a two-band model with the light-carrier and heavy-carrier channels plotted together with the individual contributions of the channels. Inset: Hall effect for this sample at 130 K, and its simulation using carrier concentrations ne = 2.8 × 1020 cm−3 and mobility μ = 9.9 cmV−1 s−1 for the light-carrier channel, respectively ne = 1.6 × 1021 cm−3 and μ = 3.6 cmV−1 s−1 for the heavy-carrier one.

The above experimental data is simulated in a two-band model, using carrier densities computed from the ARPES data (see Table 1) for heavy and light charge carriers as follows:

$$\rho ^{{\mathrm{xy}}} = \frac{B}{q}\frac{{\left( {n_1\mu _1^2 + n_2\mu _2^2} \right) + (n_1 + n_2)(\mu _1\mu _2B)^2}}{{\left( {n_1\mu _1 + n_2\mu _2} \right)^2 \,+\, (n_1 + n_2)^2(\mu _1\mu _2B)^2}}$$
(1)

with ρxy the Hall resistivity, ni the charge density of each conducting channel, μi their corresponding mobilities, B the magnetic field, and q the elementary charge.

The longitudinal resistivity is obtained from the equation:

$$\frac{1}{{\rho ^{{\mathrm{xx}}}}} = \frac{1}{{\rho _1^{{\mathrm{xx}}}}} + \frac{1}{{\rho _2^{{\mathrm{xx}}}}},$$
(2)

where \(\rho _1^{{\mathrm{xx}}}\) and \(\rho _2^{{\mathrm{xx}}}\) are the longitudinal resistivities of the two different carriers, which correspond to two non-interacting channels that conduct in parallel.

For the heavy carriers, the scattering rate is dominated by scattering with impurities, magnons, and phonons in the presence of the strong EPI that gives rise to the formation of polarons43. The resistivity for the polaronic carriers is:

$$\rho _1^{{{{\mathrm{xx}}}}} = \,\, \rho _{\mathrm{P}}({\it{T}}) = \rho _0^p + \rho _{1.5}^pT^{1.5} \\ + \rho _{e - ph}\frac{{\omega _0}}{{{\mathrm{sin}} \, {\mathrm{h}}^2(\hbar \omega _0/2k_BT)}}{\mathrm{exp}}[g^2{\mathrm{co}}{\mathrm{th}}(\hbar \omega _0/2k_BT)]$$
(3)

with ρ0, ρ1.5, and ρe−ph, the contributions at the total resistivities resulting from impurity scattering, magnon scattering and respectively phonon scattering and g2 the band narrowing factor.

On the other hand, although the light carriers are subject to the same scattering mechanisms, the EPI is only weak and the scattering rate with phonons follows a T5 power law, due to the Bloch-Gruneisen temperature being much higher than the critical temperature of CCMO, which can be expressed in the form:

$$\rho _2^{\mathrm{xx}} = \rho _{\mathrm{F}}\left( T \right) = \rho _0^F + \rho _{1.5}^FT^{1.5} + \rho _5T^5$$
(4)

For details on the derivation of (3) and (4) see Supplementary Note 3.

The results of the fit are in Fig. 4, and the obtained values for the fit parameters are presented in Table 2. The Hall resistivity shows a very weakly non-linear dependence on the magnetic field, consistent with the two types of charge carriers. Using carrier densities computed from the ARPES data (see Table 1) for heavy and light charge carriers, we obtain the correct trend for their mobilities, with the heavy-carrier mobility values smaller by a factor of 3. This is consistent with larger m* of these charge carriers inferred from their non-dispersive character which results from strong polaronic coupling found in ARPES, and confirms the derived dichotomy of the heavy electrons strongly coupled with lattice vibration and of the light ones in weakly coupled regime.

Table 2 Fit parameters for transport data.

Discussion

Why is the polaronic coupling so strong for the heavy charge carriers, in contrast to the light ones where such effects lead to only weak coupling? At first sight, the difference might be connected with different EPI matrix elements for the corresponding t2g and eg derived wavefunctions. Surprisingly, our DFT-based EPI calculations have found similar values of these matrix elements (Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, the difference in wavefunction character does not explain the extreme sensitivity of polaronic coupling of the heavy charge carriers to doping.

The answer should lie in different Fermi energy ΔεF in each case, i.e., the occupied bandwidth between the band bottom and EF. In the case of the 3D bands, the experiment shows ΔεF > ωph, and the EPI manifestations in A(k,ω) do not go beyond the formation of a kink typical of a weak EPI strength. This situation is described within the conventional Migdal theorem (MT), neglecting high-order vertex corrections to the EPI self-energy. In this case the strong coupling regime cannot be reached and the quasiparticle peak stays clearly discernible. In the case of the q2D bands, on the other hand, we have ΔεFωph. The MT is no longer valid in this situation, and high-order vertex corrections to EPI become important. The system enters into the strong coupling regime, as expressed by a broad red-shifted phonon hump of A(k,ω). Indeed, recent calculations using the exact Diagrammatic Monte Carlo method44 have demonstrated, at the time without direct experimental verification, that the vertex corrections are indispensable to capture the strong coupling regime of polaronic renormalization and that their suppression just extinguishes the weak to strong coupling crossover. Furthermore, recent calculations45 within the many-body Bold-Line Diagrammatic Monte Carlo method46 have shown that these corrections become important when ΔεF ≈ ωph. This effect has also been suggested for the electron pairing mechanism in cuprates47,48. In our case, ΔεF of the q2D bands falls in the energy range around 50–80 meV of the EPI-active phonons (Supplementary Fig. 11), invoking the strong polaronic coupling through the MT-breakdown and concomitant boost of the vertex corrections. As in CCMO the heavy-polaron nq2D much prevails over the light-electron n3D, their large m* dramatically reduces their transport efficiency at our doping levels. The increase of ΔεF with band filling explains the weakening of the polaronic effects in these bands when going from CCMO2 to CCMO4 (Fig. 3c, d and Supplementary Fig. 10a, b). We note that the light electrons, fast compared to the lattice oscillations, are much more effective in screening EPI compared to the slow, heavy polarons. Therefore, EPI in the light subsystem is much decoupled from the heavy subsystem. On the other hand, the former can participate in screening of EPI in the latter. Their small n3D compared to nq2D is however insufficient to quench completely the strong EPI for the heavy subsystem. We note that the EPI boost on the verge of MIT can be particularly important in superconductivity, where it can promote phonon-mediated formation of Cooper pairs in materials with otherwise insufficient EPI strength. These ideas cannot however be directly stretched to electron interactions with magnons because their bosonic properties are intrinsically valid only for small bosonic occupation numbers, making vertex corrections small in all circumstances.

Apart from the EPI, essential for the formation of the dichotomic charge carriers in CCMO are electron correlations. Indeed, as evidenced by our DFT + U calculations (Supplementary Fig. 12), they push the q2D bands up in energy, thereby reducing their ΔεF and triggering the boost of the EPI, much stronger compared to the 3D ones. Therefore, the electron correlations and EPI beyond the MT are two indispensable ingredients of the charge-carrier dichotomy in CCMO. First-principles calculations, incorporating both effects, still remain a challenge.

The EPI boost on the verge of MIT identified here for CCMO should be a hallmark of this transition phenomenon for many TMO systems, including high-temperature superconducting cuprates47,48. Indeed, the TMOs are characterized by strong electron coupling with the lattice which, apart from various lattice instabilities such as Jahn-Teller distortions as well as tilting and rotations of the oxygen octahedra12,13,14,15,49,50, gives rise to polaronic activity. Physically, our results show that upon going from the insulating to metallic state of TMOs, electrons do not immediately evolve from localized to delocalized states. Rather, they stay entangled with the lattice, as manifested by the EPI boost, as long as their energy stays on the lattice-excitation energy scale. In our case, tracing of the EPI-induced effects in CCMO has been facilitated, in contrast to other TMOs, by the absence of structural transitions interfering with the phonon excitations and, in contrast to other strongly correlated systems like cuprates and pnictides, by the favorable situation that all elementary excitations other than phonons, including electron interactions, magnons and plasmons, have much different energy scales. The MT-breakdown effects should not however be pronounced in conventional semiconductors like Si or GaAs, where relatively weak electron coupling to the lattice at all doping levels is evidenced, for example, by temperature-independent lattice structure up to the melting point. Finally, by identifying the interplay between electron correlations and EPI as the origin of the m* enhancement in lightly-doped CMO, our work sheds light on the recent observation of a giant topological Hall effect in this material21, and suggests strategies for its realization in other systems. To the best of our knowledge, our study on CCMO is the first case where a dramatic distinction of charge carriers has been unambiguously identified as tracing back not to merely one-electron band structure or electron-correlation effects like in pnictides, for example, but to peculiarities of electron-boson coupling.

Summarizing, our combined SX-ARPES and transport study supported by DFT-based calculations of EPI in Ce-doped CMO has established the co-existence of two dichotomic charge-carrier subsystems dramatically different on their EPI-activity: (1) light electrons forming a Fermi liquid in the 3D eg 3z2 − r2 derived bands, where the weak EPI could manifest as band dispersion kinks, and (2) heavy large polarons in the q2D eg x2 − y2 bands, where correlations reduce the occupied bandwidth ΔεF to be comparable or smaller than ωph, pushing the system into a regime where the MT breaks down. This invokes strong vertex corrections to the electron self-energy, and EPI boosts with an almost complete transfer of the spectral weight to the polaronic hump. The increase of doping in CCMO progressively increases ΔεF of the q2D bands and thus, by the MT recovery and concomitant reduction of EPI, the mobility of the corresponding heavy charge carriers. An alternative route to tune EPI in CCMO is compressive or tensile epitaxial strain which alters filling and thus ΔεF of the 3D vs. q2D bands51,52. Our findings disclose the previously overlooked important role the EPI can play in MITs even caused by purely electronic mechanisms.

Methods

Sample growth

20 nm and 30 nm Ca1−xCexMnO3 (x = 2%, 4% nominal Ce concentrations) thin films were grown by pulsed laser deposition from stoichiometric targets on (001) YAlO3 substrates using a Nd:YAG laser. Commercial YAlO3 (001) oriented substrates were prepared with acetone cleaning and ultrasound in propanol, and then annealed at 1000 °C in high O2 pressure. The substrate temperature (Tsub) and oxygen pressure (\({P_{{\mathrm{O}}_2}}\)) during the deposition were 620 °C and 20 Pa, respectively. Post-deposition annealing was performed at Tsub ≈ 580 °C and \({P_{{\mathrm{O}}_2}}\! = 30\) kPa for 30 min, followed by a cool-down at the sample oxygen pressure. The thickness of the Ca1−xCexMnO3 thin films was measured by X-ray reflectivity with a Bruker D8 DISCOVER. The samples are ~1% compressively strained at the YAlO3 (001) in-plane lattice constant21,33. Magnetotransport measurements were performed on 30 nm thick samples using measurement bridges patterned by optical lithography and Ar ion etching. Electrical contacts for measurements were made on platinum electrodes defined by a combination of lithography and lift-off techniques.

SX-ARPES experiment

The virtues of SX-ARPES include the increase of photoelectron mean free path λ with energy and the concomitant reduction of the intrinsic broadening Δkz defined, by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, as Δkz = λ−127,28. Combined with free-electron dispersion of high-energy final states, this allows sharp kz-resolution and thereby accurate navigation in k-space of 3D materials like CCMO20,28. SX-ARPES experiments were carried out at ADRESS beamline at Swiss Light Source which delivers high soft-X-ray photon flux of more than 1013 photons−1 s−1 0.01% bandwidth. The endstation29, operating at a grazing X-ray incidence angle of 20°, used the analyzer PHOIBOS-150 (SPECS GmbH). The combined (beamline+analyzer) energy resolution was about 65 meV at 643 eV. The measurements were performed on 20 nm thick samples, at low temperature T = 40 K using circularly polarized X-rays. In order to prevent sample degrading under the X-ray beam and the accompanying reduction of Ce from Ce4+ to Ce3+ and of Mn4+ to Mn3+ (Supplementary Figs. 11, 12) SX-ARPRES measurements were conducted in oxygen atmosphere at a partial pressure of 6.9 × 10−7 mbar. Photoelectron kinetic energy and emission angle were converted to k with a correction for photon momentum hv/c, where c is the speed of light29. The value of the inner potential used to render the incoming energy to kz was V0 = 10 eV53. The dispersive structures in the ARPES images were emphasized by subtracting the non-dispersive spectral component obtained by angle integration of the raw data (Supplementary Fig. 9).

First-principles calculations

First-principles calculations were carried out for CMO and Ce-doped CMO in the orthorhombic Pnma structure with 20 atoms in the primitive unit cell, using spin-polarized density-functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the Quantum Espresso package54,55. The core-valence interaction was described by means of ultrasoft pseudopotentials, with the semicore 3s and 3p states taken explicitly into account in the case of Ca and Mn. The calculations were converged by using a plane-wave cutoff of 60 Ry and a 6 × 4 × 6 Brillouin-zone (BZ) grid for the antiferromagnetic (AFM) ground state with G-type order. Doping was described within the rigid-band approximation using the nominal Ce concentrations of 2 and 4%. The 2% doping due to the coexisting Mn4+/Mn2+ states corresponds to additional 0.16 e/unit cell, and 0.32 e/unit cell for 4% Ce. Charge neutrality was maintained by including a compensating positively-charged background. A denser 10 × 8 × 10 BZ grid was used to converge the ground-state properties in the doped case.

Electrical and magnetic characterization

The magnetotransport characterization of the CCMO samples was performed in a Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS) Dynacool. The temperature dependence of the resistivity was measured at a constant current of 5 μA during a warming run after field cooling. For Hall measurements, magnetic fields were swept up to ±8 T. To separate the Hall contribution from that of the longitudinal magnetoresistance, an antisymmetrization procedure was performed by separating the positive and negative field sweep branches, interpolating the two onto the same field coordinates and then antisymmetrizing using:

$$\rho {\prime}_ \pm \left( { + H} \right) = [ {\rho _ \pm \left( { + H} \right) - \rho _ \mp \left( { - H} \right)} ]/2$$