Hydroxychloroquine blocks SARS-CoV-2 entry into the endocytic pathway in mammalian cell culture

Yuan, Zixuan; Pavel, Mahmud Arif; Wang, Hao; Kwachukwu, Jerome C.; Mediouni, Sonia; Jablonski, Joseph Anthony; Nettles, Kendall W.; Reddy, Chakravarthy B.; Valente, Susana T.; Hansen, Scott B.

doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03841-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 14 September 2022

Hydroxychloroquine blocks SARS-CoV-2 entry into the endocytic pathway in mammalian cell culture

Communications Biology volume 5, Article number: 958 (2022) Cite this article

154k Accesses
18 Citations
3581 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 02 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a drug used to treat lupus and malaria, was proposed as a treatment for SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, albeit with controversy. In vitro, HCQ effectively inhibits viral entry, but its use in the clinic has been hampered by conflicting results. A better understanding of HCQ’s mechanism of actions in vitro is needed. Recently, anesthetics were shown to disrupt ordered clusters of monosialotetrahexosylganglioside1 (GM1) lipid. These same lipid clusters recruit the SARS-CoV-2 surface receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to endocytic lipids, away from phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PIP₂) clusters. Here we employed super-resolution imaging of cultured mammalian cells (VeroE6, A549, H1793, and HEK293T) to show HCQ directly perturbs clustering of ACE2 receptor with both endocytic lipids and PIP₂ clusters. In elevated (high) cholesterol, HCQ moves ACE2 nanoscopic distances away from endocytic lipids. In cells with resting (low) cholesterol, ACE2 primarily associates with PIP₂ clusters, and HCQ moves ACE2 away from PIP₂ clusters—erythromycin has a similar effect. We conclude HCQ inhibits viral entry through two distinct mechanisms in high and low tissue cholesterol and does so prior to inhibiting cathepsin-L. HCQ clinical trials and animal studies will need to account for tissue cholesterol levels when evaluating dosing and efficacy.

ROS-dependent S-palmitoylation activates cleaved and intact gasdermin D

Article 10 April 2024

Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery

Article 10 August 2021

Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells

Article 05 October 2021

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a viral infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), recently emerged as a serious public health problem^1,2. Currently, millions of people have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. Proposed treatments for severe symptoms include a well-known FDA-approved antimalarial and anti-inflammatory agents chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)^3,4,5,6,7, but their mechanisms of action are poorly understood in human cells (and in particular in the presence of underlying conditions). A retrospective study claimed a benefit in particular with the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin⁸. However, their use is not without controversy^9,10, and randomized control studies without an antibiotic appeared to have no benefit¹¹. In the treatment of malaria, CQ targets the replication cycle of the parasite¹²; This mechanism of action is presumably unrelated to their actions in COVID-19, Lupus, and Niemann-Pick Syndrome. Understanding the underlying in vitro mechanism for these compounds in COVID-19 could help in understanding their mechanism of action in humans, in designing efficacious clinical trials, and in bettering the translation of their use in the clinic.

Previous research from the lab shows that a cholesterol-dependent mechanism for anesthetics regulates the movement of membrane proteins between monosialotetrahexosylganglioside1 (GM1) lipid clusters and PIP₂ lipid clusters through perturbing the affinity of proteins for GM1 clusters^13,14. While the GM1 clusters are formed by cholesterol packing (Van der Waals interactions) with palmitates covalently attached to proteins (palmitoylation)¹⁵, the PIP₂ clusters are formed from charged-protein clustering¹⁶ (Supplementary Fig. 1a) located near disordered lipids. We refer to the nonclustered region as the ‘disordered region’ of the cell since it is separate from GM1 clusters¹⁷ and contains unsaturated lipids that are disordered. PIP₂ is thought to cluster near disordered lipids^18,19. In cellular membranes, both local and general anesthetics act as a chaotrope to disrupt the cholesterol-induced clustering of palmitoylated proteins^13,20. Within this process, cholesterol protects against the disruption of cells by sealing the air-water interface of the lipid membranes²¹.

Cholesterol is critical to both viral entry and immune responses²². The cholesterol-rich GM1 clusters facilitate endocytosis^23,24. SARS-CoV-2 surface receptor (angiotensinogen converting enzyme 2 (ACE2))^25,26,27 has recently been shown to move between GM1 clusters and PIP₂ clusters in a cholesterol-dependent manner²⁸. As the cellular cholesterol level rises, both the number of endocytic lipids and their apparent cluster size increase. In an obese mouse model, cholesterol was high in lung tissue, and this correlated with ACE2 movement to the endocytic lipids, a condition that accelerated viral entry into the target cells in cell culture²⁸.

Cholesterol in blood appears to be low in multiple studies of COVID-19 patients with severe disease^29,30. However, the cellular cholesterol concentration measured in monocytes of the same patients was elevated³⁰, suggesting an opposite result in blood and tissue at the late stages of the disease. Importantly, cholesterol synthesis and uptake into immune cells is a key effector of inflammation³¹. The cholesterol transport protein apolipoprotein E (apoE) both loads and unloads cholesterol to and from cellular membranes³², allowing us to manipulate cholesterol levels both in vitro and in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 1b).

Interestingly, CQ is an anesthetic—subcutaneous injections of CQ produce instant local anesthesia sufficient to perform a surgical procedure^33,34. Also, both CQ and tetracaine, a local anesthetic, are hydrophobic and contain a tertiary amine (Fig. 1a). Since CQ and local anesthetics (such as tetracaine) are weak bases, their uptake changes the acid-base balance within the membrane^35,36. Additionally, common local anesthetics (such as mepivacaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine) and other GM1 cluster disrupting compounds (such as sterols and cyclodextrin) can exert antiviral or antimicrobial activity^37,38,39,40. Terpenoids can also disrupt viral entry; this process is cholesterol-dependent⁴¹.

**Fig. 1: Anesthetics and hydroxychloroquine inhibit SARS2-PV entry into cultured cells.**

Both the cholesterol-dependent lipid disruption and antiviral properties of anesthetics, along with the anesthetic and antiviral properties of HCQ link the lipid disruption properties of HCQ with its viral-entry inhibiting effects. Further research into this link could help us understand both HCQ and anesthetics’ underlying molecular mechanism(s) in mammalian cells; in particular, mammalian cells in a high-cholesterol state—a state that is consistent with the chronic inflammation and the comorbidities of COVID-19⁴², lupus^43,44, and Niemann pick⁴⁵. Prior models speculated that HCQ inhibited cathepsin-L by changing the endosomal pH⁴⁶. However, if HCQ disrupts ACE2 clustering, it would reverse the effects of cholesterol and inhibit the endocytic entry prior to the cathepsin-L cleavage. Here we use super-resolution imaging to show that HCQ disrupts the clustering of ACE2 with both endocytic lipids and PIP₂.

Results

Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 entry by anesthetic compounds

In order to test a membrane-disruptive mechanism for HCQ inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry, we compared HCQ to anesthetics (tetracaine and propofol) which are known to be membrane-disruptive. HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 were infected with a retrovirus pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SARS2-PV). A segment of the spike protein binds to ACE2 and recapitulates viral entry^47,48. A luciferase encoded in the pseudotyped virus is then used to quantitate viral entry (Fig. 1b–d).

Treatments with HCQ, tetracaine, and propofol all robustly reduced SARS2-PV entry into HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 (Fig. 1b). The cells were first treated with drugs (50 µM) for 1 h, then the drugs were removed. After the treatment and subsequent drug removal, SARS2-PV was applied such that the virus was never exposed to the drugs, thus avoiding potential direct effects of cholesterol on the viron. HCQ had the greatest effect on viral inhibition with almost a 90% reduction in SARS2-PV luciferase activity (Fig. 1b). We used 50 µM since that concentration was previously shown to be the minimum concentration that fully inhibited viral entry³. The concentration is ~5-fold above the concentration found in lung epithelial lining fluid after 400 mg for 1 day⁴⁹ making it an appropriate concentration to see a full effect by dSTORM. Like anesthetics, the actual concentration of HCQ in the membrane is dictated by a partition coefficient and the resultant mole fraction, not external concentration.

In Vero E6 cells, a cell line that endogenously expresses ACE2 receptor and robustly facilitates SARS-CoV-2 viral entry⁵⁰, HCQ, tetracaine, and propofol all significantly decreased viral entry (Fig. 1c). HCQ again showed the strongest effect decreasing viral entry by ~92%. Cell viability after HCQ treatment was assessed by Fixable Viability Dye (FVD) staining and MTT assay. The FVD staining labeled dead cells and found that HCQ treatment had no effect on Vero E6 cells, in agreement with a previous study³, but did decrease live cell number by ~23.93 ± 5% in HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Similarly, the MTT assay showed HCQ treatment significantly decreased cell metabolism in HEK293T cells by ~36.05 ± 6% (Supplementary Fig. 1d). However, the reduction in cell viability of HCQ did not account for the full reduction in viral entry. Tetracaine and propofol had no adverse effects on cell viability in vero E6 or HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 1e).

COVID-19 is often severe in obese patients and those with underlying conditions. We obtained lung samples from adult humans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We found the lung tissue to have significantly higher free-cholesterol levels compared to cultured lung cell lines as measured by our fluorescent cholesterol assay (Fig. 1e). To recapitulate the physiological conditions observed in COVID-19 patients, we tested HCQ’s inhibition on viral entry in HEK293T loaded with cholesterol and overexpressing ACE2. To load cholesterol into cells, 4 µM apolipoprotein E (apoE, a cholesterol carrier protein linked to the severity of COVID-19⁵¹) was applied. ApoE binds to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors in tissue and facilitates the loading of cholesterol into cells⁵² (Supplementary Fig. 1b). To provide a source of cholesterol to the apoE, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, a common source of cholesterol) totaling ~310 µg/mL was added. Importantly, apoE is not present in FBS, allowing us to carefully control cholesterol loading^32,53. When apoE is in excess or in low-cholesterol conditions, it facilitates the efflux of cholesterol from the cell^32,52. Cells were treated acutely (1 h) for loading or unloading cholesterol prior to viral infection.

Loading cells with cholesterol into HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 increased viral entry by ~56 ± 38% (Supplementary Fig. 1f), which is consistent with observations with endogenously expressed ACE2 where cholesterol loading significantly increased viral entry by ~36 ± 7% (Supplementary Fig. 1g). As expected, treatment of cholesterol loaded cells with HCQ (~85 ± 12%) and tetracaine (~43 ± 12%) reduced SARS2-PV entry in a high-cholesterol state (Fig. 1d). The efficacy of HCQ was reduced in cholesterol loaded cells compared to non-cholesterol loaded cells, but only slightly.

To confirm that apoE loads and unloads cholesterol from cultured cells, we treated HEK293T, Vero E6, and A549 cells with apoE with and without 10% FBS and measured the relative change in membrane-free cholesterol (Fig. 1f). Cells that were incubated with and without a source of cholesterol contained small but significant increases and decreases in total cholesterol respectively. The loading and unloading of cholesterol were similar in H1793 cells, although the loading of cholesterol did not reach statistical significance.

HCQ’s disruption of ordered GM1 clusters

The ability of a virus to cluster is important for its infectivity and maturation^54,55,56,57. Previously, anesthetics were shown to perturb clustering in two ways. First, inhaled anesthetics tend to increase the apparent size and number of clusters, as observed using super-resolution imaging and cluster analysis, while local anesthetics tend to decrease the cluster size^13,20. Second, both inhaled and local anesthetics disassociate cholesterol-sensitive proteins from GM1 clusters. The dissociation of proteins from a GM1 cluster is recorded by two-color direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) super-resolution imaging. The GM1 and PIP₂ lipid, and ACE2 protein are fixed and labeled with cholera toxin B (CTxB, a pentadentate toxin binding GM1 lipids), PIP₂ antibody, and ACE2 antibody, respectively, and then ACE2 association with the lipid is measured by pair correlation analysis (Fig. 2a). The antibodies in this study were previously validated for specificity (see methods). We previously used these techniques to monitor nanoscopic movement (<100 nm) of multiple proteins between both GM1 and PIP₂ clusters^{13,20,28,32,58} (see also Discussion).

**Fig. 2: Hydroxychloroquine displaces ACE2 from both GM1 and PIP2 clusters in kidney cells.**

To test HCQ’s effects on lipid membranes, the effect of HCQ was first examined on the apparent structure (size and number) of GM1 clusters by dSTORM in the membranes of HEK293T cells. This was done using density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN). The use of HEK293T cells allowed us to compare the effects of HCQ to previous anesthetic studies in HEK293T cells^13,20. As mentioned, 50 µM HCQ is the minimum saturating concentration that was shown to inhibit viral entry in cultured cells³.

We tested 50 µM HCQ and found it increased the number and apparent size (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c) of GM1 clusters, despite lowering the free cholesterol in the membrane (Supplementary Fig. 1h). HCQ’s perturbation to cluster size in HEK293T cells was most similar to the inhaled anesthetics chloroform and isoflurane¹³ (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Methyl-beta cyclodextrin (MβCD), a chemical known to deplete GM1 clusters from the cell membrane, decreased the apparent size of GM1 clusters and showed a trend of decreasing cluster numbers (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Interestingly, HCQ had the opposite effect on lung cells. HCQ decreased cluster size and a number of GM1 clusters, a result that is similar to what was seen for local anesthetics in nerve cells (Supplementary Fig. 2d–f)²⁰.

HCQ’s effects on ACE2 clustering in kidney and lung cells

In cells and animals with low cholesterol, ACE2 clusters primarily with PIP₂; however, in high-cholesterol and obese animals, ACE2 appears to cluster primarily with GM1 lipids²⁸. To compare the effect of HCQ on ACE2 clustering in conditions of high and low cholesterol, we loaded and unloaded cholesterol into and from wild-type (wt.) HEK293T and Vero E6 cells (kidney) with apoE in the presence and absence of serum cholesterol. The cells were then fixed, labeled with anti-ACE2 antibody and CTxB, and imaged using two-color dSTORM. Both cell lines express low levels of endogenous ACE2^32,59.

We found a 50 µM HCQ treatment in HEK293T cells dramatically decreased ACE2 receptor association with GM1 clusters, despite increases in both GM1 cluster size and number (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). Figure 2b shows representative dSTORM images comparing the disruption of HCQ on colocalization of ACE2 and GM1 clusters. At short distances (0–10 nm), pair correlation decreased 41 ± 18% (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2c, S3A), confirming that HCQ acts as a chaotrope to disrupt the ability of GM1 clusters to sequester ACE2. This result is in agreement with its anesthetic-like mechanism of action and its effect on PLD2¹³.

As mentioned earlier, ACE2 moves to PIP₂ clusters in resting/low-cholesterol conditions. PIP₂ clusters reside near disordered lipids apart from GM1 clusters due to a large amount of unsaturation in PIP₂’s acyl chains^18,60. To determine whether ACE2 moves to PIP₂ clusters after HCQ’s disruption of GM1 clusters, ACE2 and PIP₂ clusters were co-labeled in HEK293T cells at resting/low-cholesterol levels, then treated with/without 50 µM HCQ.

Figure 2d shows representative dSTORM images comparing PIP₂ clusters (purple labeling) before/after HCQ treatment in HEK293T cells. Surprisingly, the pair correlation between ACE2 and PIP₂ clusters was decreased (Fig. 2e) at all distances (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The decrease of 77 ± 25% at short distances (0–10 nm) (p < 0.05) suggests that HCQ disrupts ACE2 association with both GM1 clusters and PIP₂ clusters, presumably forcing the protein to disordered lipids in the plasma membrane. Further characterization of the PIP₂ clusters showed HCQ treatment decreased both the size and number of PIP₂ clusters by 20 ± 4%, and 44 ± 13% respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d).

Next, we tested Vero E6 cells, which, as mentioned, endogenously express ACE2. Probing the nanoscale trafficking of ACE2 with endogenously expressed protein is important as overexpression can overwhelm the ability of GM1 lipids to sequester the receptor away from PIP₂ and alter imaging results. Cholesterol-treated cells were fixed and stained for ACE2, and either GM1 clusters or PIP₂ clusters. Within low-cholesterol conditions, ACE2 colocalized to both GM1 and PIP₂ clusters (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b, Supplementary Table 1). Fifty micromolar HCQ treatment of ACE2 reduced the pair correlation between ACE2 and both GM1 clusters (59 ± 31%, p = 0.0789) and PIP₂ clusters (32 ± 19%, p = 0.1071) (Fig. 2f, g).

In Vero E6 cells with elevated cholesterol, again, ACE2 associated with both GM1 and PIP₂ clusters. However, 50 μM HCQ treatment had the greatest effect on ACE2’s association with both clusters (70 ± 17%, p < 0.01) (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Fig. 2g) compared to PIP₂ clusters (52 ± 11%, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2i, Supplementary Fig. 2h). This suggests HCQ has its greatest effect on endocytic lipids when cholesterol is high (Fig. 2j).

Next, we tested A549 lung cells since HCQ appeared to affect the size of GM1 lipids differently compared to HEK293T and Vero (Supplementary Fig. 2). A549 lung cells were loaded in a manner identical to VeroE6 cells using apoE. Prior to HCQ treatment, ACE2 predominately associated with GM1 clusters in both resting cholesterol and high cholesterol. However, after loading cholesterol, ACE2 shifted out of PIP₂ clusters (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d, i, j; Supplementary Table 1). Treatment with 50 μM HCQ disrupted colocalization of ACE2 receptors with GM1 clusters in both resting and high-cholesterol-treated cells (Fig. 3a, g), but not PIP₂ (Fig. 3b, h). A trend toward increased PIP₂ pair correlation suggested some translocation of ACE2 from GM1 to PIP₂ clusters with high cholesterol may occur (p = 0.14, dashed arrow). The movement of ACE2 in A549 cells is summarized in Fig. 3e, k.

**Fig. 3: Cholesterol dictates hydroxychloroquine’s effect in lung cells.**

Lastly, we compared pair correlation in H1793 lung cells before and after cholesterol treatment. In resting H1793 cells (low cholesterol), most of the ACE2 was associated with PIP₂ clusters (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f), but the association shifted toward GM1 clusters after loading cells with cholesterol (Supplementary Fig. 4k, l, Supplementary Table 1). After treatment with 50 μM HCQ, ACE2 was displaced from PIP₂ clusters in resting cells and from GM1 clusters in high cholesterol (Fig. 3d, i), but not GM1 clusters in resting cholesterol or PIP₂ clusters in high cholesterol (Fig. 3c, j). The movement of ACE2 in H1793 is summarized in Fig. 3f, l.

To estimate the distance ACE2 moves between compartments in the membrane, we labeled GM1 and PIP₂ domains and performed two-color dSTORM on the lipids. We found the half maximal nearest neighbor ranges from 133 to 235 nm (Supplementary Table 1, and Supplementary Fig. 4s–v). The distribution of GM1 and PIP₂ in the membrane appeared to be random, and their separation appeared uncorrelated with labeling intensity (Supplementary Fig. 4w, x).

HCQ’s disruption of PLD2

If the lipid disruption we observed with HCQ in lung and kidney cells is acting through the same membrane-mediated pathway as shown for general anesthetics, then we expect that HCQ also releases the anesthetic-sensitive protein phospholipase D2 (PLD2) from GM1 clusters. Anesthetics such as xenon, chloroform, isoflurane, propofol, and diethyl ether all displace PLD2 from GM1 clusters to activate an anesthetic pathway^13,61.

To confirm HCQ’s anesthetic-like effect, clustering of PLD2 with GM1 lipids was monitored by two-color dSTORM in HEK293T cells with and without 50 µM HCQ treatment. 50 µM HCQ robustly disrupted PLD2 localization with GM1 clusters (Fig. 4a, b). Quantification of the % pair correlation at short radiuses (0–10 nm) decreased by 74 ± 13% (Fig. 4c). And this correlated with a decrease in the space between clusters (Fig. 4d). Hence HCQ’s effect on the lipid membrane is similar to general anesthetics (Supplementary Fig. 2a) in HEK293T cells. After treatment, the clusters are larger, and the ability to retain a palmitoylated protein (PLD2) is inhibited¹³.

**Fig. 4: HCQ displacement of PLD2 from GM1 clusters.**

Next, we tested the enzymatic activity of PLD2 in the presence of 50 µM HCQ. HCQ robustly inhibited PLD2 with a EC50 of 167 µM (standard error: 96–291 µM, Fig. 4e, f). The inhibition initially appeared similar to the direct binging that local anesthetic use to inhibit PLD²⁰. However, when we tested HCQ’s ability to directly inhibit purified cabbage PLD, it had no effect (Fig. 4g), suggesting HCQ either has specificity for mammalian PLD2 over cabbage PLD, or HCQ inhibits by blocking its access to PIP₂.

Erythromycin inhibits viral entry through perturbing GM1 clusters

Azithromycin is an antibiotic derived from erythromycin that is sometimes given in combination with HCQ. Although azithromycin has shown antiviral properties in numerous studies^62,63,64,65, the results of its usage with COVID-19 patients in combination with HCQ have been mixed⁸. Based on the cholesterol sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2, we hypothesized that erythromycin could contribute to an antiviral effect through disruption of GM1 clusters leading us test to its effects on SARS2-PV.

We found erythromycin (100 µg/mL⁶⁶) significantly inhibits SARS2-PV infection 69 ± 17% in HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 at normal cholesterol levels (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Consistent with the disruptive mechanism, the same treatment increased membrane fluidity 70 ± 11% (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Furthermore, using PLD2 activity as a surrogate for an effect in live cells showed a 12 ± 4% increase (Supplementary Fig. 5c), consistent with cluster disruption. When the cholesterol level was increased using apoE and serum, erythromycin was no longer effective. In fact, when the pair correlation of ACE2 and GM1 correlation was examined, the association of ACE2 with GM1 increased by 97 ± 55% (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). This suggests erythromycin is unable to overcome the cholesterol-induced clustering of ACE2 with GM1 lipids in elevated cholesterol.

HCQ’s disruption of host defense peptides

Lastly, HCQ’s effects on host defense peptides were considered. Host defense peptides are amphipathic antimicrobial peptides that are upregulated during an immune response and perturb the membranes of microbes^67,68. Cholesterol and GM1 cluster integrity show great importance to the modulation of both innate and acquired immune responses³¹. Amyloid-beta (Aβ) has been demonstrated to protect against microbial infection as a host defense peptide. The production of Aβ is regulated by the delivery of cholesterols to neurons by apoE³². ApoE regulates hydrolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by clustering mechanism (Supplementary Fig. 1i). If HCQ disrupts GM1 lipids, then it is expected that HCQ to decrease APP pair correlation with GM1 lipids.

Aβ production was measured in HCQ-treated cells using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). HCQ was found to reduce Aβ generation by 11 ± 4% in cultured HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 5d). The observed effect was statistically significant (p < 0.05). HEK293T cells were then loaded with cholesterol (apoE + serum) to better reflect the disease state of COVID-19 with severe symptoms. In the high-cholesterol state, HCQ did not inhibit Aβ production, resulting in a 24 ± 4% rise compared to production in low cholesterol. Since tetracaine and propofol also disrupt GM1 clusters, their effects on Aβ production were also tested and found to be very similar in both high- and low-cholesterol settings (Supplementary Fig. 5d, e).

Discussion

Taken together, our findings show that HCQ has its greatest effect on cells with high cholesterol (Figs. 2i and 3g, i). In a high-cholesterol state, ACE2 is typically associated with endocytic lipids and moves primarily to disordered lipids. In a low-cholesterol state, ACE2 is associated primarily with PIP₂ clusters and also moves to disordered lipids. The location of ACE2 in low lipids is consistent with a surface entry mechanism. Figure 5a (left panel) shows a proposed cellular model for HCQ’s membrane effect on viral entry in low cholesterol. As cholesterol increases (e.g., in COPD patients that smoke (Fig. 1e) or those with underlying conditions²⁸), ACE2 shifts to endocytic lipids, and HCQ disrupts this interaction.

**Fig. 5: Model for HCQ mechanism of action in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.**

Previous studies have sought to address the discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo experiments with HCQ⁶⁹. The partitioning of HCQ into negatively charged endosomes is thought to contribute⁶⁹. PIP₂ clusters are also highly negatively charged and likely drive the partitioning of HCQ. Elevated cholesterol is a second contributor revealed by our studies. And since HCQ opposes the effects of cholesterol, both animal and cultured-cell experiments in low cholesterol likely fail to capture the full benefits of HCQ. For example, lung cells and monkey’s studies showed no reduced effect in using HCQ in a low-cholesterol state (reflecting the physiological state of a child or healthy adult), but it does not reflect the risk an obese patient has of death from severe COVID-19 symptoms^70,71, nor the potential of HCQ to affect ACE2 in a high-cholesterol state.

The more recent omicron variant has been shown to enter primarily through the endocytic pathway^72,73. The omicron variant is also more infectious in children and healthy adults⁷⁴, further supporting our findings here that moving the virus into the endocytic pathway increases infectivity. Stratifying patients by the level of lung cholesterol may reveal a benefit for HCQ and help avoid potential toxicity of HCQ in some cell types (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Cholesterol is typically measured in the blood, not the tissue. Blood is primarily a transient transport system and thus may not accurately predict years of accumulation in the lung of obese or chronically inflamed patients^28,31. In conclusion, better diagnostics of cholesterol in lung tissue are needed to assess the ideal conditions for testing HCQ treatment.

Figure 5b shows a proposed molecular model of HCQ disrupting SARS-CoV-2 viral entry through perturbation of GM1 clustering. In an inflamed state, cholesterol traffics ACE2 from PIP₂ clusters to GM1 lipids, where virions dock and enter through the endocytic pathway. The perturbation of both GM1 and PIP₂ clusters by HCQ likely inhibits viral entry by decreasing the clustering of ACE2. The mechanism of surface receptor clustering was also shown to be important to influenza virus⁵⁴.

ACE2 expression levels vary greatly between cell types leading us to investigate multiple types of lung and kidney cells. Furthermore, HEK293T overexpressing ACE2 is widely used in SARS-CoV-2 studies to understand how ACE2 facilitates viral entry with a stable expression of ACE2. However, the overexpression could artificially drive ACE2 clustering with GM1 lipids or artificially increase the concentration of ACE2 in the disordered region. For this reason, we used wild-type HEK293T without overexpression of ACE2 in our dSTORM experiments and compared the results to additional cell types. VeroE6 cells are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and used for testing drug effects on viral entry. Both A549 and H1793 are lung cell lines that mimic an early site of infection.

It is unclear where ACE2 resides when it is excluded from both GM1 clusters and PIP₂ clusters. Presumably, it moves into a generic set of disordered lipids on the plasma membrane, but these lipids would need to be identified if they are clustered. Alternatively, ACE2 may move into PIP₃ domains. PIP₃ is separate from GM1 and PIP3 domains¹⁸.

Erythromycin contains a tertiary amine similar to HCQ. Other aminoglycosides (e.g., neomycin) are known to bind tightly to and scavenge PIP₂. Scavenging PIP₂ is normally thought to block ligand binding^60,75 or change a surface charge. Our data here suggest hydrophobic-charged molecules disrupt both PIP₂ and the resulting clustering with ACE2. Many proteins are likely affected by decreased localization to PIP₂ clusters.

As mentioned, prior models speculated that HCQ inhibits cathepsin-L by changing the endosomal pH⁴⁶. While we did not actually test if SARS2-PV reaches the endosome, the lack of access to endocytic lipids in the HCQ-treated cells suggests that the virus may never reach cathepsin-L, and blocking cholesterol uptake appears to inhibit viral entry⁷⁶. Another model suggests that the HCQ could inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 viral entry step by inhibiting the binding of the spike protein to the sugar head group of GM1^77,78. Glycosylation often affects the trafficking of proteins, and the two mechanisms could be complementary. However, it is not known if GM1 clustering or cholesterol contributes to glycosylation.

The similarities between HCQ and anesthetics in their chemical properties, viral entry inhibition, and disruption on GM1 clusters suggest that both HCQ and anesthetics could share a parallel mechanism of action. Our data suggest a shared mechanism based on chaotropic disruption of ordered lipids. Consistent with this hypothesis, CQ exhibits side effects similar to those reported in anesthetics⁷⁹. Since HCQ partitions into the membrane, the mole fraction of the drug in the membrane is the clinically relevant concentration, not the concentration in the buffer. Based on the significant inhibition of SARS2-PV entry from tetracaine and propofol, a local anesthetic, and a general anesthetic, other anesthetic-like chemicals are likely helpful in treating COVID-19. Anesthetic with sugammadex dramatically decreases post-operative pulmonary complication⁸⁰.

HCQ likely has a similar mechanism of action in treating Niemann-Pick syndrome, which is caused by increased GM1 clustering in the plasma membrane. HCQ likely disrupts the excess lipids in the membrane, thus reversing their effect. For example, Niemann-Pick syndrome increases APP clustering⁸¹, and we showed that HCQ decreases the clustering of APP (Supplementary Fig. 5d, e). The number of proteins that could be affected by clustering is extensive and warrant investigation.

HEK293T was recently shown to express low levels of endogenous ACE2^59,73. The low levels are most similar to in vivo expression of ACE2²⁸. Overexpression of ACE2 likely causes loss of GM1 regulation, and the enzyme likely distributes into both GM1 and non-GM1 regions²⁸. Hence, the increased viral infection in ACE2 overexpressed cells likely includes the avidity and random association of lots of particles irrespective of ACE2 specific clustering with GM1, and the reduced efficacy of tetracaine and HCQ inhibiting viral entry in high cholesterol (57.7% vs. 50.3% and 15.6% vs. 12.8%, respectively, see Fig. 1d) may be underestimated by ACE2 overexpression. Nonetheless, in wild-type cells, ACE2 localization is still sensitive to cholesterol, and the same trend should hold true. This conclusion is further supported in Fig. S5D-E where erythromycin was unable to block Aβ production in high cholesterol.

Lastly, all the imaging was performed with endogenously expressed proteins to avoid loss of GM1 clusters associated with the regulation of ACE2. The lipids were labeled after fixing to reduce movement between clusters during labeling and to limit potential local lipid clustering by CTxB, especially saturated lipids. CTxB is pentadentate and in unfixed lipids causes clustering⁸², and to some degree, CTxB clustering occurs in fixed cells¹⁹. Some CTxB clustering is similar to a technique reported by Reinhard Jahn called antibody patching. This technique uses limited artificial clustering to better define the locations of protein. However, artificial clustering can affect the absolute size of a GM1 cluster, which is why we drew no significant conclusion from the absolute size of the GM1 clusters. Since we examined disruption of lipids, the CTxB could have decreased the amount of disruption we reported for apparent GM1 cluster size (i.e., the amount of disruption may be under-reported), which is why we describe an “apparent cluster” size. We do not know the absolute cluster size with certainty. PIP₂ is polyunsaturated, and we expect it is much better fixed in the membrane. Nonetheless, we refer to apparent cluster size as an abundance of caution since this study focused on a change in cluster size and not a structural characterization of their cellular makeup.

Methods

Reagents

Hydroxychloroquine, PLD assay reagent amplex red 10-Acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine, and 2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (C8-PC) were purchase from Cayman Chemical and tetracaine, methylbetacyclodextrin (MβCD), and cabbage PLD were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Horseradish peroxidase and choline oxidase were purchased from VWR.

Pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2-PV) viral entry assay

Cells and virus

HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL-3216) and HEK293T-ACE2 overexpressing cells (generated and provided by the Farzan lab⁸³) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Corning^TM, #10-013-CV) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma–Aldrich, #F0926) and 1% Penicillin Streptomycin (PS, Corning^TM, #30-002-Cl) at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. A549 cells (ATCC, CCL-185) were cultured in F-12K Medium (Gibco, #21127-022) with 10% FBS, 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco, #35050-061), 1% Minimum Essential Medium Non-Essential Amino Acids (MEM NEAA, Gibco, #11140-050), and 1% PS, at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. H1793 cells (ATCC, CRL-5896) were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium with 5% FBS, 1% GlutaMax, and 1% PS, at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. Vero E6 cells (ATCC, CCL-81) were cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM, ATCC, 30-2003) with 10% FBS and 1% PS at 37 °C with 5% CO₂.

SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped particles were constructed using plasmid co-transfection, and the particles were maintained at −80 °C. The constructs were a gift from Dr. Mike Farzan, Scripps Research, Florida. Evaluation of antiviral activities in HEK293T-ACE2 overexpressing cells (0.5 × 105 cells/well), also provided by Dr. Mike Farzan, were cultured in 96-well cell-culture plates (Corning^TM Coastar^TM Cell Culture 96-well plates, #3585) and incubated with 100 μL pseudotyped particles of each type, together with 50 μM hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ, Cayman, #17911) or 50 μM tetracaine hydrochloride (Sigma–Aldrich, #T7508) for 1 h. Then, the virus-drug mixture was removed, and a fresh medium was added. After 24 h, the particle yields were determined through a luciferase assay. Cells were washed with PBS, and 16 μL Cell Culture Lysis Reagent (Promega, #E153A) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 15 min. with rocking at room temperature. Eight microliters of cell lysate from each well was added into a 384-well plate, followed by the addition of 16 μL of Luciferase Assay Substrate (Promega, #E151A). Luciferase activity measurements were performed on a Spark 20 M multimode microplate reader (Tecan). The luciferase activity, interpreted as infection, was plotted in GraphPad Prism 6 software. All the infection experiments were performed in a biosafety level-2 (BLS-2) laboratory.

Super-resolution microscopy (dSTORM)

To detect the perturbation to GM1 clusters¹⁴ by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), we employed Super Resolution Microscopy. Briefly, HEK293T cells were grown in 8-well chamber slides (Nunc Lab-Tek chamber slide system, Thermo Fisher Scientific), washed, and treated with 30–50 μM hydroxychloroquine for 30 min. The cells were then fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde, 30–50 μM hydroxychloroquine for 20 min, and quenched with 0.1% NaBH₄ for 7 min. Cells were then washed with PBS (three times) and permeabilized with 0.2% TritonX 100 in PBS for 15 min. The permeabilized cells were blocked using a standard blocking buffer containing 10% BSA and 0.05% Triton in PBS for 90 min. For labeling, cells were incubated with primary antibody (anti-ACE2 antibody (Abcam, #ab189168; SinoBiological, 80031-RP01), anti-PLD2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 13904 S), or anti-PIP₂ antibody (Echelon Biosciences, Z-P045)) for 60 min in antibody buffer (PBS with 5% BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100) at room temperature followed by five washes with wash buffer (PBS with 1% BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100) for 15 min each. Secondary antibodies (Cy3B conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Jackson Immuno Research, 711-005-152) and Alexa 647 conjugated Cholera Toxin Subunit B (CTxB, Thermo Fisher Scientific, C34778)) were added with antibody buffer for 30 min at room temperature followed by five washes as stated above. Then, cells were washed with PBS for 5 min and fixed for 10 min with fixation buffer as above, followed by 5 min washes with PBS three times, and 3 min washes with deionized distilled water. All steps except for pre- and postfixation were performed with shaking. See below for antibody validation.

A Zeiss Elyra PS1 microscope was used for super-resolution microscopy with an oil-immersed ×63 objective lens in TIRF mode. Images were acquired by Andor iXon 897 EMCCD camera and Zen 10D software with an exposure time of 18 ms per acquisition. Total 7000–10,000 frames were collected. Alexa Fluor 647 and Cy3B were excited with a 642 nm and 561 nm laser in a photo-switching buffer consisting 1% betamercaptoethanol, 0.4 mg glucose oxidase, and 23.8 µg catalase (oxygen scavengers), 50 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, and 10% glucose at pH 8.0. Localization drifts were corrected with n autocorrelative algorithm⁸⁴. The drift-corrected coordinates were converted to be compatible with Vutara SRX software by an Excel macro. Cluster analysis and pair correlations were determined with the default modules in Vutara SRX software. DBSCAN algorithm was applied to determine the clusters which are within the search radius (ε) of 100 nm and consisting of at least 10 localizations. The apparent cluster size was calculated by measuring the full-width half max (FWHM) of the clusters. Pair correlation was also determined in the Vutara SRX software. The data were binned at 5 nm increments. The radial precision of our instrument is between 4 and 8 nm (Supplementary Fig. 6). We looked at the data for each curve and used either 0–5 nm or 5–10 nm as the quality of the data dictated. When calculating statistical significance by comparing the pair correlation of two conditions (e.g., with and without HCQ), the samples were always prepared and imaged at the same time. The data at the shortest binned distance (5 nm) was used unless the amount or quality of the data was insufficient, in which case 0–10 nm was used (see also the experimental setup in Fig. 2a).

Sandwich ELISA assay

HEK293T cells were cultured in 96-well cell-culture plates. Each well was incubated with and without 100 µL treatments for 1 h, then washed with 100 µL PBS once and incubated with 100 µL PBS for 1 h. Supernatants were collected and analyzed for Aβ40 ELISA.

A 96-well plate was coated with 50 µL capture antibody (IBL #11088) at 5 µg/ml concentration in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. All of the rest incubations were performed at room temperature. The plate was washed with 200 µL PBS three times, and 100 µL blocking buffer (PBS with 10%BSA and 0.05% TritonX-100) was added to each well and incubated for 1 h. Next, the blocking buffer was removed, and 50 µL of supernatant was added to each well and incubated for 1 h, followed by the addition of 50 µL primary antibody (Invitrogen^TM #PA3-16760) at 1:10,000 dilution in PBST buffer (PBS with 0.01% TritonX-100). After a 3 h incubation, the plate was washed with 200 µL PBST four times, and 100 µL HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Invitrogen^TM #31460) at 0.4 µg/ml concentration in PBST buffer was added for 1 h incubation in the dark. Then, the plate was washed with 200 µL PBST four times. 80 µL Chromogen (Invitrogen^TM #002023) was added and incubated in the dark for 30 min. Finally, 80 µL stop solution (Invitrogen^TM #SS04) was applied to terminate the substrate development. Measurement of absorbance at 450 nm was performed on a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite 200 PRO) to determine relative Ab40 concentration.

Antibody validation

The specificity of anti-ACE2 antibodies (Abcam, #ab189168, used on HEK293T cells and Vero cells; SinoBiological, 80031-RP01, used on A549 cells and H1793 cells) have been validated by western blot (Abcam) and ELISA (SinoBiological) (see manufacture product page). A549 cells have been reported to show consistent expression of ACE2⁸⁵, and both HEK293T cells and A549 cells are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2²⁶.

The specificity of the anti-PLD2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 13904 S) has also been validated by western blot (see manufacture product page). For HEK293T cells, the western blot analysis of cell extracts shows no band in the wild-type. One possibility is that the wild-type cells have a significantly lower expression level compared to the PLD2 overexpressed cells, and such a difference weakens the sensitivity of this assay when most antibodies bind to the overexpression lane. This western blot analysis further validates the specificity of the antibody in HEK293T cells. Besides, HEK293T cells have been reported to show PLD activity without transfection⁸⁶.

The specificity of anti-PIP2 antibody (Echelon Biosciences, Z-P045) has been validated by PLCδ1 competition and neomycin inhibition⁸⁷.

Membrane fluidity test

The change of membrane fluidity of HEK293T cells was measured using the Membrane Fluidity kit (Abcam) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, ~10,000 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated with the drugs and the fluorescent lipid reagent containing pyrene decanoic acid (2 mM) at room temperature for 20–30 min. with. Pyrene decanoic acid exists as either a monomer or an excimer, the latter forms due to the change in the membrane fluidity. The formation of the excimers shifts the emission spectrum of the pyrene probe to a longer wavelength. The changes in spectrum emission were measured with a fluorescence microplate reader (Tecan Infinite 200 Pro). The ratio of monomer (EM 372 nm) to excimer (EM 470 nm) fluorescence was calculated to obtain a quantitative change in the membrane fluidity.

In vitro cellular and enzymatic PLD assay

In vitro cellular PLD2 activity was measured in cultured HEK293T cells by an enzyme-coupled product release assay¹⁴ using amplex red reagent. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (~5 × 10⁴ cells per well) and incubated at 37 °C overnight to reach confluency. The cells were starved with serum-free DMEM for a day and washed once with PBS (phosphate-buffered saline). The PLD reaction was initiated by adding 100 μL of reaction buffer (100 μM amplex red, 2 U/ml horseradish peroxidase (HRP), 0.2 U/ml choline oxidase, and 60 μM C8-PC in PBS). The assay reaction was performed for 2–4 h at 37 °C, and the activity was kinetically measured with a fluorescence microplate reader (Tecan Infinite 200 Pro) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 530 nm and 585 nm, respectively. For enzymatic PLD assay, cabbage PLD was used instead of the live cells, and the PLD reaction was initiated as described for the cellular assay. The PLD2 activity was calculated by subtracting the background activity (reaction buffer with the drugs, but no cells). For the bar graphs, samples were normalized to the control activity at the 120 min time point.

In vitro free-cholesterol assay

In vitro free-cholesterol assay was measured in lysed human lung tissue, A549 cells, and H1793 cells by an Amplex Red-based assay²⁸. Airway tissue samples (~1 mg) were fixed in PFA and stored at 4 degrees prior to the assay. Cells were cultured with the complete medium as described earlier in 96-well plates until ~90% confluent and fixed with PFA. Lung tissue and cultured cells were homogenized with RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific 89900) overnight and centrifuged to collect supernatant for cholesterol and protein measurement. Protein concentration was determined through NanoDrop A280 measurement. Samples normalized by protein concentration were mixed with assay buffer containing 100 μM Amplex red, 2 U/mL horseradish peroxidase, 4 U/mL cholesterol oxidase, and 4 U/mL cholesteryl esterase in PBS to reach 100 μL of reaction volume. The assay reaction was measured by a fluorescence microplate reader (Tecan Infinite 200 PRO) at an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 585 nm. Relative cholesterol concentration was determined by fluorescence activity and calculated by subtracting the background activity of the reaction buffer without samples.

Fixable viability dye cell staining

Fixable Viability Dye (FVD) eFluor^TM 506 (Invitrogen, 65-0866) was used to label dead cells in both HEK293T cell and Vero E6 cell cultures with or without HCQ treatment. Cells were cultured as previously described in 96-well plates until ~90% confluent and treated with or without 50 μM HCQ for 1 h before the staining. Cells were scraped off by 1000 μL pipette tips and transferred to V-bottom 96-well plates (Corning 3894). Next, cells were washed with 200 μL PBS twice and incubated with 100 μL FVD (1:1000) for 30 min at 4 °C in dark. After that, cells were washed with 200 μL PBS twice and analyzed by MACSQuant^® Analyzer 10 Flow Cytometer. Data were analyzed by FlowJo.

MTT assay

MTT assay kit (Abcam, Ab211091) was applied to assess cell metabolic activity in both HEK293T cell and Vero E6 cell cultures with or without HCQ/tetracaine/propofol treatment. Cells were cultured as previously described in 96-well plates until ~90% confluent and treated with or without 50 μM HCQ/tetracaine/propofol for 1 h before the assay. After the treatments, the cells were washed with 200 μL PBS once and incubated with 50 μL serum-free media and 50 μL MTT Reagent in each well at 37 °C for 3 h. Next, 150 μL MTT Solvent was added to each well, and the plate was shaken on an orbital shaker for 15 min in dark. Absorbance was read at OD = 590 nm by Tecan infinite M200 PRO.

Statistics and reproducibility

Data calculations and graphs were performed in Prism 6 (GraphPad software) or Microsoft Excel. Experiments were done two-three times to ensure reproducibility. All Experimental samples were performed in random order when to avoid any experimental bias. To ensure the reproducible effect of the sample sizes, super-resolution imaging was carried out on multiple cells. Each image is a separate cell, and each ‘n’ comes from a separate image, so each n is a biological repeat. Furthermore, the data are from at least two separate experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s test, two-tailed t-tests, parametric or nonparametric wherever appropriate. Data are shown as the mean and the error bars with SD. Significance is indicated by ns not significant, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, and ****P ≤ 0.0001.

We have indicated the technical repeats (‘n’) for each analysis. For dSTORM imaging, the data are from at least two separate experiments. Each image is a separate cell, and each ‘n’ comes from a separate image. So, the biological repeats are the same as the technical repeats. We have indicated this in the methods describing the dSTORM. For cellular assays, each ‘n’ comes from a separate well.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data are deposited in Mendeley Data (https://doi.org/10.17632/swh2crwhpg.1).

Change history

02 November 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04172-4

References

Sohrabi, C. et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int. J. Surg. 76, 71–76 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Holly, J. M. P., Biernacka, K., Maskell, N. & Perks, C. M. Obesity, diabetes and COVID-19: an infectious disease spreading from the east collides with the consequences of an unhealthy Western Lifestyle. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 11, 1–13 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Cell Discov. 6, 1–4 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758 (2020)
Wang, M. et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 30, 269–271 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cortegiani, A., Ingoglia, G., Ippolito, M., Giarratano, A. & Einav, S. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. J. Crit. Care https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.005 (2020).
Gautret, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 (2020).
Arshad, S. et al. Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 97, 396–403 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ledford, H. Safety fears over drug hyped to treat the coronavirus spark global confusion. Nature 582, 18–19 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Million, M. et al. Clinical Efficacy of Chloroquine derivatives in COVID-19 Infection: comparative meta-analysis between the Big data and the real world. N. Microbes N. Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100709 (2020).
Kupferschmidt, K. Big studies dim hopes for hydroxychloroquine. Science 368, 1166–1167 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sullivan, D. J., Gluzman, I. Y., Russell, D. G. & Goldberg, D. E. On the molecular mechanism of chloroquine’s antimalarial action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11865–11870 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pavel, M. A., Petersen, E. N., Wang, H., Lerner, R. A. & Hansen, S. B. Studies on the mechanism of general anesthesia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13757–13766 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petersen, E. N., Chung, H.-W., Nayebosadri, A. & Hansen, S. B. Kinetic disruption of lipid rafts is a mechanosensor for phospholipase D. Nat. Commun. 7, 13873 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lingwood, D. & Simons, K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327, 46–50 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van den Bogaart, G. et al. Membrane protein sequestering by ionic protein-lipid interactions. Nature 479, 552–555 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sezgin, E., Levental, I., Mayor, S. & Eggeling, C. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 361–374 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Robinson, C. V., Rohacs, T. & Hansen, S. B. Tools for understanding nanoscale lipid regulation of ion channels. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 795–806 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petersen, E. N., Pavel, M. A., Wang, H. & Hansen, S. B. Disruption of palmitate-mediated localization; a shared pathway of force and anesthetic activation of TREK-1 channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862, 183091 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pavel, M. A., Chung, H.-W., Petersen, E. N. & Hansen, S. B. Polymodal mechanism for TWIK-related K+ channel inhibition by local anesthetic. Anesth. Analg. 129, 973–982 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Barraza, K. M. & Beauchamp, J. L. Cholesterol provides nonsacrificial protection of membrane lipids from chemical damage at air–water interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3255–3260 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schmidt, N. M., Wing, P. A. C., McKeating, J. A. & Maini, M. K. Cholesterol-modifying drugs in COVID-19. Oxf. Open Immunol. 1, 1–6 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Ewers, H. & Helenius, A. Lipid-mediated endocytosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004721–a004721 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bayati, A., Kumar, R., Francis, V. & McPherson, P. S. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells after viral entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 1–12 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426, 450–454 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e8 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ortiz, M. E. et al. Heterogeneous expression of the SARS-Coronavirus-2 receptor ACE2 in the human respiratory tract. EBioMedicine 60, 1–13 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Wang, H., Yuan, Z., Pavel, M. A. & Hansen, S. The role of high cholesterol in aged related COVID19 lethality. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.086249 (2020).
Zinellu, A. et al. Cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, COVID-19 severity, and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Front. Public Heal. 9, 1–14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hu, X., Chen, D., Wu, L., He, G. & Ye, W. Low serum cholesterol level among patients with COVID-19 infection in Wenzhou, China. SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544826 (2020).
Tall, A. R. & Yvan-Charvet, L. Cholesterol, inflammation and innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 104–116 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102191118 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
MANDEL, E. H. A new local anesthetic with anticoagulant properties, chloroquine (aralen) dihydrochloride. Arch. Dermatol. 81, 260–263 (1960).
Chang, Y. J., Liu, K. S., Wang, J. J., Hung, C. H. & Chen, Y. W. Chloroquine for prolonged skin analgesia in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 735, 1–5 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Krogstad, D. J. & Schlesinger, P. H. The basis of antimalarial action: non-weak base effects of chloroquine on acid vesicle pH. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36, 213–220 (1987).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Chawla, R. & Goyal, M. Topical anesthesia. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 31, 450–456 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cervin, M. & Anderson, R. Modulation of coronavirus‐mediated cell fusion by homeostatic control of cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. J. Med. Virol. 35, 142–149 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. The important role of lipid raft-mediated attachment in the infection of cultured cells by coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus beaudette strain. PLoS ONE 12, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar
Miller, D. K. & Lenard, J. Antihistaminics, local anesthetics, and other amines as antiviral agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3605–3609 (1981).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hollmann, M. W., Durieux, M. E. & Fisher, D. M. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology 93, 858–875 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mediouni, S. et al. Oregano oil and its principal component, carvacrol, inhibit HIV-1 fusion into target cells. J. Virol. 94, 1–21 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in the novel Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 91–95 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cairoli, E., Rebella, M., Danese, N., Garra, V. & Borba, E. F. Hydroxychloroquine reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal evaluation of the lipid-lowering effect. Lupus 21, 1178–1182 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Westerterp, M. et al. Cholesterol accumulation in dendritic cells links the inflammasome to acquired immunity. Cell Metab. 25, 1294–1304.e6 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carstea, E. D. et al. Niemann-Pick C1 disease gene: Homology to mediators of cholesterol homeostasis. Science 277, 228–231 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ou, T. et al. Hydroxychloroquine-mediated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 entry is attenuated by TMPRSS2. PLoS Pathog. 17, 1–15 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Quinlan, B. D. et al. The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicits a potent neutralizing resonse without antibody-dependent enhancement. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.036418 (2020).
Moore, M. J. et al. Retroviruses pseudotyped with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein efficiently infect cells expressing angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J. Virol. 78, 10628–10635 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ruiz, S. et al. Hydroxychloroquine lung pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 57, 106247 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ren, X. et al. Analysis of ACE2 in polarized epithelial cells: Surface expression and function as receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 87, 1691–1695 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuo, C.-L. et al. APOE e4 genotype predicts severe COVID-19 in the UK Biobank community cohort. Journals Gerontol. Ser. A https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa131 (2020).
Luo, J., Yang, H. & Song, B. L. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 225–245 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Varma, V. P. et al. Ocular fluid as a replacement for serum in cell cryopreservation media. PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Sieben, C., Sezgin, E., Eggeling, C. & Manley, S. Influenza A viruses use multivalent sialic acid clusters for cell binding and receptor activation. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008656 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Curthoys, N. M. et al. Influenza hemagglutinin modulates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate membrane clustering. Biophys. J. 116, 893–909 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chojnacki, J. & Eggeling, C. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy studies of human immunodeficiency virus. Retrovirology 15, 1–16 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Sengupta, P. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Revisiting membrane microdomains and phase separation: a viral perspective. Viruses 12, 745 (2020).
Petersen, E. N. et al. Lipid rafts transduce force to TREK-1 channels via phospholipase D. FASEB J. 33, 6–797.6 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Dicken, S. J. et al. Characterisation of B.1.1.7 and Pangolin coronavirus spike provides insights on the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.22.436468 (2021).
Hansen, S. B. Lipid agonism: The PIP2 paradigm of ligand-gated ion channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1851, 620–628 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petersen, E. N., Clowes, K. R. & Hansen, S. B. Measuring anesthetic resistance in Drosophila by VAAPR. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/797209 (2019).
Gielen, V., Johnston, S. L. & Edwards, M. R. Azithromycin induces anti-viral responses in bronchial epithelial cells. Eur. Respir. J. 36, 646–654 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Min, J. Y. & Jang, Y. J. Macrolide therapy in respiratory viral infections. Mediators Inflamm. 2012, 1–9 (2012).
Bleyzac, N., Goutelle, S., Bourguignon, L. & Tod, M. Azithromycin for COVID-19: more than just an antimicrobial? Clin. Drug Investig. 40, 683–686 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schögler, A. et al. Novel antiviral properties of azithromycin in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells. Eur. Respir. J. 45, 428–439 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mascio, C. T. M., Alder, J. D. & Silverman, J. A. Bactericidal action of daptomycin against stationary-phase and nondividing Staphylococcus aureus cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 4255–4260 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gosztyla, M. L., Brothers, H. M. & Robinson, S. R. Alzheimer’s amyloid-β is an antimicrobial peptide: a review of the evidence. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 62, 1495–1506 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kumar, D. K. V. et al. Amyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 340ra72 (2016).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fan, J. et al. Connecting hydroxychloroquine in vitro antiviral activity to in vivo concentration for prediction of antiviral effect: a critical step in treating patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 3232–3236 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. et al. Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 585, 588–590 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maisonnasse, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature 585, 584–587 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, H. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant shows less efficient replication and fusion activity when compared with Delta variant in TMPRSS2-expressed cells. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 277–283 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meng, B. et al. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. Nature 603, 706–714 (2022).
Cloete, J. et al. Paediatric hospitalisations due to COVID-19 during the first SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant wave in South Africa: a multicentre observational study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Heal 6, 294–302 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hansen, S. B., Tao, X. & MacKinnon, R. Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature 477, 495–498 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schmidt, N. M. et al. An ACAT inhibitor regulates SARS-CoV-2 replication and antiviral T cell activity. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.12.487988 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fantini, J., Scala, C. Di, Chahinian, H. & Yahi, N. Structural and molecular modeling studies reveal a new mechanism of action of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105960 (2020).
Li, G. M., Li, Y. G., Yamate, M., Li, S. M. & Ikuta, K. Lipid rafts play an important role in the early stage of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus life cycle. Microbes Infect. 9, 96–102 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Borba, M. G. S. et al. Effect of high vs low doses of chloroquine diphosphate as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. open 3, e208857 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kheterpal, S. et al. Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pulmonary complications (STRONGER). Anesthesiology 132, 1371–1381 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kosicek, M., Malnar, M., Goate, A. & Hecimovic, S. Cholesterol accumulation in Niemann Pick type C (NPC) model cells causes a shift in APP localization to lipid rafts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 393, 404–409 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moon, S. et al. Spectrally Resolved, Functional Super-Resolution Microscopy Reveals Nanoscale Compositional Heterogeneity in Live-Cell Membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10944–10947 (2017).
Mou, H. et al. Mutations derived from horseshoe bat ACE2 orthologs enhance ACE2-Fc neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 17, 1–17 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Mlodzianoski, M. J. et al. Sample drift correction in 3D fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Opt. Express 19, 15009–15019 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, D. et al. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in human primary conjunctival and pterygium cell lines and in mouse cornea. Eye 34, 1212–1219 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Paruch, S., El‐Benna, J., Djerdjouri, B., Marullo, S. & Périanin, A. A role of p44/42 mitogen‐activated protein kinases in formylpeptide receptor‐mediated phospholipase D activity and oxidant production. FASEB J. 20, 142–144 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hammond, G. R. V. et al. Elimination of plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate is required for exocystosis from mast cells. J. Cell Sci. 119, 2084–2094 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health with an R01 to S.B.H. (R01NS112534) and the US Department of Defense with an Accelerating Innovation in Military Medicine to S.B.H. (W81XWH1810782). The funding supported all the salaries and research expenses for these studies. We thank the Iris and Junming Le Foundation and the JPB Foundation for the purchase of super-resolution microscopes, making this study possible. We are grateful to Michael Farzan for providing SARS2-PV and HEK293T-ACE2 overexpressing cells. We are grateful to Junli Luo for providing HEK293T cells. We thank Mark Sundrud and Amber Eliason for assistance in FVD cell staining. We thank Dominic Albao for assistance in performing flow cytometry.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Zixuan Yuan, Mahmud Arif Pavel.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA
Zixuan Yuan, Mahmud Arif Pavel, Hao Wang & Scott B. Hansen
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA
Zixuan Yuan, Mahmud Arif Pavel, Hao Wang & Scott B. Hansen
Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA
Zixuan Yuan & Hao Wang
Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA
Jerome C. Kwachukwu & Kendall W. Nettles
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA
Sonia Mediouni, Joseph Anthony Jablonski & Susana T. Valente
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
Chakravarthy B. Reddy

Authors

Zixuan Yuan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mahmud Arif Pavel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hao Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jerome C. Kwachukwu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sonia Mediouni
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Joseph Anthony Jablonski
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kendall W. Nettles
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chakravarthy B. Reddy
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Susana T. Valente
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Scott B. Hansen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.Y. and H.W. performed viral entry assays; S.M., J.A.J., and J.C.K. produced virus and cells for the viral entry assays. Z.Y. and M.A.P. performed imaging experiments and PLD assays. C.B.R. provided human lung tissue. H.W. performed in vitro free-cholesterol assays, and Z.Y. performed the Aβ experiments with the help of H.W. Z.Y. performed FVD cell staining and MTT assay. Z.Y., M.A.P., and S.B.H. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.T.V. and K.W.N. provided resources and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott B. Hansen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Manuel Breuer.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuan, Z., Pavel, M.A., Wang, H. et al. Hydroxychloroquine blocks SARS-CoV-2 entry into the endocytic pathway in mammalian cell culture. Commun Biol 5, 958 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03841-8

Download citation

Received: 08 November 2021
Accepted: 12 August 2022
Published: 14 September 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03841-8

This article is cited by

Quercetin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection and prevents syncytium formation by cells co-expressing the viral spike protein and human ACE2
- Annie V. Roy
- Michael Chan
- Majambu Mbikay
Virology Journal (2024)
Therapeutics for COVID-19
- Sima S. Toussi
- Jennifer L. Hammond
- Annaliesa S. Anderson
Nature Microbiology (2023)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and COVID-19
- Maria Pappa
- Alexandros Panagiotopoulos
- Antonis Fanouriakis
Current Rheumatology Reports (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.