Abstract
Progress towards sustainability is hampered by differing perceptions of how to advance goals in systems characterized by massive interdependency. Systems thinking has been advocated as a model for improving understanding and management of complex systems, but theory and methods to analyse systems thinking are not well developed. We propose and apply a new way of assessing systems thinking using social network tools to analyse mental models. We examine the cognitive maps of 148 thought leaders in sustainable agriculture in California and measure the extent to which each map captures six fundamental causal patterns. We find that the more complex forms of causal structure that are associated with systems thinking are relatively under-represented in the experts’ maps. Our findings have important implications for individual and collective decision making about sustainable agriculture and other science and policy debates involving complex systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Forrester, J. W. Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory. Decis. 2, 109–140 (1971).
Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1976).
Gray, S. A., Zanre, E. & Gray, S. in Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Applied Sciences and Engineering (ed. Papageorgiou, E. I.) 29–48 (Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, 2014).
Hoffman, M., Lubell, M. & Hillis, V. Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13016–13021 (2014).
Cash, D. W. et al. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol. Soc. 11, 8 (2006).
Levins, R. A. & Vandermeer, J. H. The Agroecosystem Embedded in a Complex Ecological Community 341–362 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990).
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N. & Leeuwis, C. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agric. Syst. 103, 390–400 (2010).
Levins, R. A. & Cochrane, W. W. The treadmill revisited. Land Econ. 72, 550–553 (1996).
Jevons, W. S. The Coal Question: An Enquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-mines (Macmillan, London, 1865).
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001).
Ortiz, M. & Wolff, M. Mass-balanced trophic and loop models of complex benthic systems in northern Chile (SE Pacific) to improve sustainable interventions: a comparative analysis. Hydrobiologia 605, 1–10 (2008).
Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).
Frank, A. B. et al. Dealing with femtorisks in international relations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17356–17362 (2014).
Barnett, T. P. et al. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319, 1080–1083 (2008).
Shiyomi, M. in Structure and Function in Agroecosystem Design and Management (eds Shiyomi, M. & Koizumi, H.) 95–112 (CRC, Boca Raton, 2001).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Metz, B., Davidson, O., Bosch, O. J. H., Dave, R. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Rothman, D. S. & Robinson, J. B. Growing pains: a conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 46, 23–43 (1997).
Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B. & Lovins, L. H. Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution (Earthscan, London, 1999).
Bosch, O. J. H., King, C. A., Herbohn, J. L., Russell, I. W. & Smith, C. S. Getting the big picture in natural resource managementsystems thinking as ‘method’ for scientists, policy makers and other stakeholders. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 24, 217–232 (2007).
Ison, R. L., Maiteny, P. T. & Carr, S. Systems methodologies for sustainable natural resources research and development. Agric. Syst. 55, 257–272 (1997).
Meadows, D. H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer (Chelsea Green, White River Junction, 2008).
Schvaneveldt, R. W. et al. Measuring the structure of expertise. Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud. 23, 699–728 (1985).
Olazabal, M., Chiabai, A., Foudi, S. & Neumann, M. B. Emergence of new knowledge for climate change adaptation. Environ. Sci. Policy 83, 46–53 (2018).
Bai, X. et al. Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 23, 69–78 (2016).
Meinke, H. et al. Adaptation science for agriculture and natural resource management urgency and theoretical basis. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 1, 69–76 (2009).
Halbrendt, J. et al. Differences in farmer and expert beliefs and the perceived impacts of conservation agriculture. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 50–62 (2014).
Gray, S. A., Chan, A., Clark, D. & Jordan, R. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in socialecological decision-making: benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecol. Model. 229, 88–96 (2012).
Stier, A. C. et al. Integrating expert perceptions into food web conservation and management. Conserv. Lett. 10, 67–76 (2017).
Gray, S. A. et al. Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 20, 11 (2015)..
Singer, A. et al. Translating community narratives into semi-quantitative models to understand the dynamics of socio-environmental crises. Environ. Model. Software 97, 46–55 (2017).
Checkland, P. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 17, S11–S58 (2000).
Cundill, G., Cumming, G. S., Biggs, D. & Fabricius, C. Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management. Conserv. Biol. 26, 13–20 (2012).
Head, B. W. & Alford, J. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Adm. Soc. 47, 711–739 (2015).
Institute of Medicine & National Research Council. A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System (National Academies, Washington, 2015).
Levy, M. A., McRoberts, N. & Lubell, M. N. Pillars of Sustainable Agriculture (Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior, 2016).
Levy, M. A. Sustainable Agriculture Knowledge Networks and Mental Models (Univ. California, Davis, 2017).
Farm Income and Wealth Statistics (USDA, Econ. Res. Service, 2017).
Lubell, M., Niles, M. & Hoffman, M. Extension 3.0: managing agricultural knowledge systems in the network age. Soc. Nat. Res. 27, 1089–1103 (2014).
Ohmart, C. P. View from the Vineyard: A Practical Guide to Sustainable Winegrape Growing (Wine Appreciation Guild, San Francisco, 2011).
Rouse, W. B. & Morris, N. M. On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychol. Bull. 100, 349–363 (1986).
White, P. A. The anthropomorphic machine: causal order in nature and the world view of common sense. Br. J. Psychol. 83, 61–96 (1992).
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 273–283 (2000).
Allison, D. J., Morfitt, G. & Demaerschalk, D. Cognitive complexity and expertise: relationships between external and internal measures of cognitive complexity and abstraction, and responses to a case problem. In Annual Meeting of the American Education Resource Association ED412604 (Educational Resources Information Center, Washington DC, 1996).
Grotzer, T. A. & Perkins, D. N. in National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual International Conference (2000).
Slotta, J. D. & Chi, M. T. Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognit. Instruct. 24, 261–289 (2006).
Eden, C. On the nature of cognitive maps. J. Manage. Studies 29, 261–265 (1992).
Bueno, S. & Salmeron, J. L. Benchmarking main activation functions in fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert Syst. Applic. 36, 5221–5229 (2009).
Richards, D. Coordination and shared mental models. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 45, 259 (2001).
Lakoff, G. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2006).
Dickerson, J. A. & Kosko, B. Virtual worlds as fuzzy cognitive maps. Pres. Teleop. Virt. Environ. 3, 173–189 (1994).
Stylios, C. D. & Groumpos, P. P. Fuzzy cognitive maps: a model for intelligent supervisory control systems. Comput. Indust. 39, 229–238 (1999).
Jetter, A. J. & Kok, K. Fuzzy cognitive maps for futures studies methodological assessment of concepts and methods. Futures 61, 45–57 (2014).
Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol. Rev. 117, 440–463 (2010).
Gray, S., Hilsberg, J., McFall, A. & Arlinghaus, R. The structure and function of angler mental models about fish population ecology: the influence of specialization and target species. J. Outdoor Recr. Tourism 12, 1–13 (2015).
Grotzer, T. A. Children’s Understanding of Complex Causal Relationships in Natural Systems (Harvard Univ., Cambridge, 1993).
Bell-Basca, B., Grotzer, T. A., Donis, K. & Shaw, S. Using domino and relational causality to analyze ecosystems: realizing what goes around comes around. In Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA (2000); http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.34.8052&rep=rep1&type=pdf
White, P. A. Naive ecology: causal judgments about a simple ecosystem. Br. J. Psychol. 88, 219–233 (1997).
Jaques, E. The development of intellectual capability: a discussion of stratified systems theory. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22, 361–383 (1986).
Langan-Fox, J., Wirth, A., Code, S., Langfield-Smith, K. & Wirth, A. Analyzing shared and team mental models. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28, 99–112 (2001).
Leveson, N. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety (MIT, Cambridge, 2011).
Davis, M. C., Challenger, R., Jayewardene, D. N. W. & Clegg, C. W. Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. Appl. Ergon. 45, 171–180 (2014).
Faust, K. & Skvoretz, J. Comparing networks across space and time, size and species. Sociol. Methodol. 32, 267–299 (2002).
Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. & Robins, G. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).
Anderson, B. S., Butts, C. T. & Carley, K. The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices. Soc. Networks 21, 239–267 (1999).
Butts, C. T. Social network analysis: a methodological introduction. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 11, 13–41 (2008).
Eden, C., Ackermann, F. & Cropper, S. The analysis of cause maps. J. Manage. Studies 29, 309–324 (1992).
Özesmi, U. & Özesmi, S. L. Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Modell. 176, 43–64 (2004).
MacDonald, N. Trees and Networks in Biological Models (Wiley, Hoboken, 1983).
Özesmi, U. & Özesmi, S. L. A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environ. Manage. 31, 0518–0531 (2003).
Krackhardt, D. in Graph Theoretical Dimensions of Informal Organizations 89–111 (1994).
Sabatier, P. A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 21, 129–168 (1988).
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. & Sabatier, P. A. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J. Public Policy 14, 175–203 (1994).
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. & Group, A. R. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).
Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482 (2011).
Gray, S. A., Gray, S., Cox, L. J. & Henly-Shepard, S. Mental Modeler: a fuzzy-logic cognitive mapping modeling tool for adaptive environmental management. In 2013 46th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences 965–973 (IEEE, Washington DC, 2013).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2017).
Handcock, M. S. et al. Statnet: Software Tools for the Statistical Analysis of Network Data (2016).
Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M. & Morris, M. Statnet: software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. J. Stat. Softw. 24, 1–11 (2008).
McElreath, R. Rethinking: Statistical Rethinking Book Package (2016).
Wickham, H. Tidyverse: Easily Install and Load ’Tidyverse’ Packages (2017).
Levy, M. netUtils: Network Utilities (2017).
Wei, T. & Simko, V. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (2017).
Galili, T. Dendextend: an R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 31, 3718–3720 (2015).
Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses (2017).
Ward, J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).
Murtagh, F. & Legendre, P. Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? J. Classific. 31, 274–295 (2014).
Stan Development Team. Stan: A C++ Library for Probability and Sampling, V. 2.10.0 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The 148 experts who provided their mental models made this study possible, and we are deeply grateful to them. Additionally, the local community leaders who helped assemble the groups of experts were essential to this study’s success, and we thank S. Rios, L. Bell, C. Smith, H. George, D. Doll and G. Miyao for their time and effort. The UC Davis Agricultural Sustainability Institute provided support that made this work possible, and we particularly thank B. Ransom for her contributions, as well as Marco Bastos and Carlos Barahona for valuable discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to designing the study, hosting workshops, analysing data, and preparing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levy, M.A., Lubell, M.N. & McRoberts, N. The structure of mental models of sustainable agriculture. Nat Sustain 1, 413–420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0116-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0116-y