Correction to: npj Digital Medicine 1:2; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4, published online 15 January 2018
The original version of this Review Article contained calculation errors within the abstract:
“Body mass index (−0.96; 95% CI: −2.30, 0.37)” has been corrected to “Body mass index (−0.73; 95% CI: −1.84, 0.38)”, “BMI I2 statistic 92% (95% Confidence Interval: [82%, 96%]” was corrected to “BMI I2 statistic 92% (95% Confidence Interval: [83%, 96%]”, “body fat percentage (0.19; −1.2,1.57)” has been corrected to “body fat percentage (−0.11; −1.56, 1.34)”, I2 statistic 85% (95% [56%, 95%])” was corrected to “body fat “I2 statistic 86% (95% [59%, 95%])”, and “diastolic blood pressure (−0.74; −2.34, 0.86)” has been corrected to “diastolic blood pressure (−0.99; −2.73, 0.74)”, “diastolic blood pressure I2 statistic 28% (95% [0%, 73%])” has been changed to “diastolic blood pressure I2 statistic 44% (95% [0%, 81%])”. These corrections have been repeated in the results section and Figs. 2, 5 and 7.
Point estimates of the mean difference for each study (green squares) and the corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (horizontal black lines) are shown, with the size of the green square representing the relative weight of the study. The black diamond represents the overall pooled estimate, with the tips of the diamond representing the 95% Confidence Intervals
Point estimates of the mean difference for each study (green squares) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) are shown, with the size of the green square representing the relative weight of the study. The black diamond represents the overall pooled estimate, with the tips of the diamond representing the 95% Confidence Intervals
Point estimates of the mean difference for each study (green squares) and the corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (horizontal lines) are shown, with the size of the green square representing the relative weight of the study. The black diamond represents the overall pooled estimate, with the tips of the diamond representing the 95% Confidence Intervals
These errors have now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Noah, B., Keller, M.S., Mosadeghi, S. et al. Author Correction: Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. npj Digital Med 1, 17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0027-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0027-3
