Abstract
While several genetic and morphological markers are established and serve to guide therapy of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), there is still profound need to identify additional markers to better stratify patients. CD105 (Endoglin) is a type I transmembrane protein reported to induce activation and proliferation of endothelial cells. In addition, CD105 is expressed in haematological malignancies and the vessels of solid tumours. Here, CD105 associates with unfavourable disease course, but so far no data are available on the prognostic relevance of CD105 in haematological malignancies. We here generated a novel CD105 antibody for analysis of expression and prognostic relevance of CD105 in a cohort of 62 AML patients. Flow cytometric analysis revealed substantial expression in the various AML FAB types, with FAB M3 type displaying significantly lower surface levels. Next we established a cut-off specific fluorescence level of 5.22 using receiver-operating characteristics, which allowed to group patients in cases with CD105lo and CD105hi surface expression and revealed that high CD105 expression correlated significantly with poor overall and progression free survival. In conclusion, we here identify CD105 expression as a novel prognostic marker in AML, which may serve to optimize follow up and treatment decisions for AML patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a malignant disorder of the haematopoietic system with a high mortality rate and variable prognosis1. Commonly used prognostic factors are cytogenetic and molecular features including inv(16), t(8;21), t(15;17) as well as IDH and FLT3 mutations2,3,4. In addition, immunophenotyping by flow cytometry provides valuable prognostic information5. However, there is still room for improvement of risk assessment, and thus identification of novel biomarkers for the prediction of remission rates, risk of relapse and overall outcome holds promise to improve the treatment of AML by guiding treatment decisions6.
CD105 (Endoglin) is a type I transmembrane protein which serves as an auxiliary receptor within the transforming growth factor (TGF) beta signalling complex and induces activation and proliferation of endothelial cells7,8. CD105 is highly expressed on vascular endothelium9 and could be detected on stromal cells, melanocytes and different healthy cells of the haematopoietic system10,11,12. Moreover, CD105 is specifically upregulated on proliferating endothelium and was found to be expressed on tumour vessels of brain, breast, colon, lung and stomach cancer13,14. The expression of CD105 on tumour vessels reportedly correlates with poor prognosis in endometrial, colorectal, breast, prostate, and non small cell lung cancer15,16,17,18,19,20. CD105 expression has also been described in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and AML21,22,23, but its prognostic relevance in these and other haematopoietic malignancies has not been assessed so far. We here report on a newly generated CD105 antibody that was used to analyse CD105 expression in a cohort of 62 AML patients and identified a strong correlation of high CD105 expression with adverse disease outcome.
Results
Generation of a novel CD105 antibody
The murine CD105 IgG2b antibody K-ro23 was generated as described in Methods section. SDS-PAGE analyses and size exclusion chromatography confirmed the presence of an intact IgG molecule with the respective light and heavy chains as well as the absence of aggregates as depicted in Fig. 1A,B. Detection of K-ro23 bound to CD105-transfected Sp2/0 as compared to mock controls by flow cytometry confirmed the specific binding of the antibody, and saturating concentrations were achieved with <1 nM (Fig. 1C,D). Binding analyses with two commercially available antibodies (SN6, 166707) on different acute leukaemic cell lines as well as on different solid tumour cell lines confirmed specific binding and the absence of false-positive signals (Figs. 1E and S1A). Titration experiments showed a higher affinity of K-ro23 to CD105 as reflected by saturation at lower concentrations and compared to SN6 similar signals at high concentrations, which were both slightly lower than 166707 (Figs. 1F and S1B).
Clinical characteristics of the AML patient cohort
For analysis of CD105 expression we employed primary AML samples of 62 patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1. Nineteen patients presented with undifferentiated leukaemia (M0: n = 4, M1: n = 15), 20 with immature granulocytic leukaemia (M2: n = 16, M3: n = 4) and 14 with monocytic leukaemia (M4: n = 8, M5: n = 6); nine patients had erythroleukaemia (M6). In 46 patients, primary and in 16 patients secondary AML was diagnosed. The age ranged from 21–86 years (with a median of 64 years) with a male:female ratio of 1:1.07. Patients were categorized by cytogenetic status according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score24. The patient cohort comprised 18 patients with favourable risk, 23 with intermediate risk and 18 with poor risk score. A detailed list of cytogenetic abnormalities for patients with ‘AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities’ can be found online as Supplementary Table S1. Induction therapy was applied to 40 patients, the remaining patients (n = 22) were treated with other approved therapies (e.g. hydroxyurea) or best supportive care. Response to chemotherapy was defined according to European Leukemia Network (ELN) definition25. Complete response (CR) was defined as presentation with normocellular bone marrow containing <5% blasts and neutrophilic granulocytes in peripheral blood (PB) recovered to 1,500/μl and platelets to 100,000/μl. In contrast, complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) lacked hematologic recovery in PB with neutrophil counts below 1,000/μl or platelets below 100,000/μl. CR after anthracycline-based induction therapy was reached in 65% of treated patients.
Prognostic evaluation of CD105 expression in AML
As a first step, expression of CD105 on the various cellular subsets within PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 8) was evaluated by flow cytometry. CD105 expression was not detectable on T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+) and natural killer (NK) (CD56+ CD3−) cells, while monocytes (CD14+) displayed substantial levels of CD105 (SFI mean 11.3) (Fig. S2A). This is in line with findings of other investigators reported for activated monocytes26.
Next, leukaemic blasts of the AML patients were analysed for CD105 expression. To verify that our newly generated CD105 mAb is also valuable for immunohistochemistry, we stained some of the AML samples and could demonstrate comparable results regarding our flow cytometric analyses (Fig. 2A). The gating strategy for flow cytometric analyses with respective controls is exemplified with two AML samples depicted in Fig. 2B and Fig. S2. Highly variable surface levels ranging from complete lack of CD105 to SFI levels of 65.2 were detected, with 57 patients (92%) displaying relevant surface levels defined as SFI ≥ 1.5. Substantial variation was also observed for the percentage of CD105+ AML blasts within individual samples, ranging from 0% to nearly 100% positive leukaemic cells (Fig. 2C). Cases with monocytic differentiation (FAB M4 and M5) tended towards a surface expression of CD105 similar to the SFI levels observed with healthy monocytes (SFI mean 11.5 and 9.97, respectively). Cases with FAB M2 displayed the most heterogeneous CD105 expression profile (Fig. 2D), and a significant lower proportion of CD105 positive AML blasts was observed in patients with FAB M3 (SFI 1.06; 2.7%) compared to the other FAB types (Fig. 2E). Comparison of FAB types with favourable (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) and unfavourable (M0, M6) prognosis27,28,29,30 revealed no significant difference, despite a trend to higher CD105 expression in the unfavourable FAB group (favourable vs. unfavourable, SFI mean 4.55 vs. 14.85; p = 0.1) (Fig. 2F).
Next, AML patients were grouped according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score. Interestingly, levels of CD105 expression correlated with NCCN risk: while the comparison of the favourable with the intermediate risk group revealed a strong tendency that did not reach statistical significance (SFI mean 8.28 vs. 14.2; p = 0.08), CD105 expression was significantly higher in the poor risk compared to the favourable NCCN risk group (SFI mean 24.18 vs. 8.28; p = 0.004) (Fig. 2G).
No significant correlation of CD105 was observed for age (>60 vs. <60 years), gender, WHO classification or primary vs. secondary AML as shown in Supplementary Table S2.
When patients were separated in quartiles (Q1-4) according to CD105 expression (Fig. 3A), a significant correlation of high surface levels with higher NCCN risk was observed (p = 0.019) (Table 2). Moreover, a significantly higher WBC was detected in the third quartile (Q3) compared to the others (mean 187.1 G/L; p < 0.01). WHO classification of AMLs revealed significantly more cases of acute myeloid leukaemia with myelodysplasia-related changes in the higher quartiles (0 vs. 3 vs. 4 vs. 3, respectively, p = 0.01). There was no difference between the quartiles with regard to age (p = 0.77), gender (p = 0.72) or favourable/unfavourable FAB classification (p = 0.17). Of note, while failing to achieve statistical significance (p = 0.06), a clear trend towards an inverse association of CD105 expression levels and achievement of CR after first anthracycline-based induction therapy was observed between the quartiles. To correlate CD105 expression in quartiles with OS, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed and revealed that patients with low or absent CD105 expression (Q1) showed superior survival and did not reach median OS in the observation time, whereas for patients in the highest quartile (Q4) median OS was 284 days (p = 0.0098) (Fig. 3B).
These findings were confirmed by ROC curve analysis (AUC 0.76; 95% CI 0.63–0.89; p = 0.0006). To discriminate between patients with better or worse OS, a predictive cut-off value for CD105 surface expression was calculated by determination of the Youden Index and defined at an SFI value of 5.22 (sensitivity 71%; specificity 79%) (Fig. 3C). Then patients were accordingly grouped in a CD105 low (CD105lo, SFI < 5.22) and a CD105 high (CD105hi, SFI ≥ 5.22) cohort. A significant trend to an overrepresentation of unfavourable FAB types in CD105hi AMLs was observed (3 vs. 10 patients; p = 0.04), while increased WBC was significantly associated with the CD105hi cohort (mean WBC 78.4 vs. 142 G/L; p = 0.009). Notably, CR after anthracycline-based induction therapy occurred in a significantly higher number of cases in the CD105lo than in CD105hi group (84% vs. 39%; p = 0.01) which is in line with the observation that the CD105hi group comprised more NCCN poor risk patients (17% vs. 43%, p = 0.0019). No significant difference was observed for age, gender or primary/secondary AML (Table 3).
Finally, the predictive value of the defined cut-off for CD105 expression was determined using Kaplan-Meier analyses, which confirmed a significant advantage in OS for the CD105lo patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.34; 95% CI 0.17–0.66, p = 0.0012) (Fig. 3D). This difference almost held true in analyses of progression free survival (PFS) after response to anthracycline based induction therapy, but failed to reach statistical significance (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.08–1.6, p = 0.15) (Fig. 3E). To confirm these results, multivariate analysis including age (<60 vs. ≥60 years), WBC, primary/secondary AML, risk profile according NCCN and CD105 expression was conducted. A HR of 0.25 was calculated for CD105 (p = 0.0044), with a slightly better HR of 0.23 reached for age (<60 vs. ≥60 years, p = 0.0008); no other variable showed significant impact on OS. Multivariate analysis for survival can be found as Supplementary Table S3.
Discussion
The TGF-beta co-receptor CD105 plays a major role in foetal, adult and malignant angiogenesis. Previous studies reported that CD105 expression on tumour vessels of endometrial, colorectal, breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancer15,16,17,18,19,20 correlates with poor outcome. Despite the fact that CD105 reportedly is expressed on malignant cells in various haematopoietic malignancies, data on its prognostic relevance in leukaemia are still not available. In this study we demonstrate that CD105 expression on leukaemic blasts strongly correlates with poor OS and PFS, poor risk profile according to NCCN and decreased response to anthracycline-based induction therapy. On the contrary, patients with absent or low CD105 levels on AML blasts revealed the best OS. We established a cut-off value of 5.22 as calculated by receiver-operating characteristics to define CD105 as marker for risk stratification in AML.
Substantial expression of CD105 was observed by flow cytometry in 57 (92%) of the total of 62 analysed patients in our cohort. Notably, in a previous study, where 119 bone marrow samples from AML patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry, CD105 positivity as defined by staining of at least 1/5 of all myeloblasts was reported in 24% of cases22. In another study, flow cytometric analysis of CD105 expression in 336 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and 666 bone marrow samples from AML patients revealed CD105 expression in 68.4% and 37% of cases, respectively21. However, no clear cut-off value was defined by the authors to differentiate between cases with good and bad prognosis. In the third study so far published on the expression of CD105 in haematopoietic malignancies, Della Porta et al. employed flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow specimens and observed CD105 expression on all erythroblasts from patients with MDS23. In our study, CD105 expression >SFI 1.5, the threshold defined by us for positivity, was observed in 92% of the analysed cases. CD105 was not detectable in any of the analysed cases of promyelocytic leukaemia (FAB M3). The same was observed by Cosimato and co-workers21, whereas Chakhachiro et al. described CD105 expression on promyelocytic blasts when using immunohistochemistry22. The discrepancy might be due to the fact that flow cytometry, like employed in the work of Cosimato and us, might be more specific and in contrast to immunohistochemistry only detects surface expressed CD105. In addition, we employed a novel CD105 antibody which was particularly selected for its sensitivity in flow cytometric staining, but applicable for immunohistochemistry as well. A direct comparison of k-ro23 with two commercially available antibodies (clones SN6, 166707) showed a higher affinity of our antibody as reflected by saturation at lower concentrations. However, the maximum signal was lower compared to 166707, the clone used by Cosimato et al. and comparable with signal intensities of SN6.
Furthermore, in contrast to the above mentioned publication, we defined a clear cut-off to differentiate between positive and negative cases. While the discrepancy could also be due to inter-individual differences between the patients or the material used for analysis (bone marrow versus peripheral blood), the fact that our antibody was particularly developed to this end may explain the higher rate of positive cases in our study.
CD105 was shown to induce activation and proliferation of endothelial cells by promotion of TGF-beta/ALK-1 signalling and direct inhibition of TGF-beta/ALK-5 signalling8,31,32. It interacts with TGF-beta receptor I and TGF-beta receptor III as well as activating bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-27. CD105 signalling has also been shown to drive angiogenesis11, and its expression is upregulated by hypoxic endothelium via hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1 alpha, which inhibits apoptosis of endothelial cells33,34. Notably, it has recently been reported that upregulation of HIF 1 alpha on AML blasts is correlated with the presence of multi-drug-resistance transporters such as multi-drug-resistance protein (MDR) 1 and MDR associated protein (MRP) 135. While the functional role of CD105 that underlies the association with inferior OS observed in our study remains unclear, it is tempting to speculate that CD105 might influence the occurrence of MDR and thereby reduce the response to chemotherapy.
Moreover, CD105 has been described as important mediator of stem cell properties in myeloid precursor cells. CD105+CD34+ expressing cells comprise a subgroup of long-term repopulating haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) which are crucial for maintaining the HSC pool36,37. Within this population, CD105 seems to be necessary for re-entry into the quiescence state, since its deletion led to engraftment failure and reduced numbers of HSCs in G0 phase in a xenograft model38. In line, CD105+ AML blasts showed faster bone marrow engraftment than CD105− blasts and led to decreased survival in a xenograft mouse model. This effect could be prevented by application of a blocking CD105 antibody, thus suggesting a critical role of CD105 in disease progression of AML39. Together, these data provide another potential explanation for the observed effect in our study and identify AML as potential disease entity that might benefit from CD105 targeted therapeutics.
Overall, the data presented in our study support the value of immunophenotyping as a fast and reliable method to achieve information on prognosis in AML in general and identify CD105 as a novel prognostic marker for adverse disease course in particular. Notably, a CD105 therapeutic antibody (TRC105) is already available and was well tolerated upon phase 1 and 2 clinical evaluation in patients with soft tissue sarcoma, hepatocellular and urothelial carcinoma40,41,42. In combination with established treatments, TRC105 achieved overall response rate of 25% in hepatocellular carcinoma and prolonged PFS in patients with soft tissue sarcoma41,42. While CD105 has so far not been analysed as therapeutic target in AML patients, our data point to the fact that this might be a promising approach. However, certainly additional analyses in preclinical models of AML including sophisticated mouse models that enable a better understanding of the functional role of CD105 are required to provide a broader basis for potential future clinical studies that might ultimately improve treatment of AML.
Methods
Patient samples
Peripheral blood samples of 62 patients with AML at primary diagnosis were collected. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the Helsinki protocol and the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen vote (13/2007V) between 2006 and 2017. All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen (13/2007V). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and healthy donors and – in case of subjects younger than 18 years – from a parent or legal guardian.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients were isolated by density gradient centrifugation und used for flow cytometric analysis. Median observational time for all patients was 360 days (95% CI 166–545 days). Diagnosis and classification of AML samples was based on morphology and cytochemistry of bone marrow according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification43,44. Cytogenetic analyses were performed with standard methods at the University of Ulm.
Generation, purification and characterization of a CD105 antibody
The murine monoclonal anti-CD105 antibody (clone K-ro23) was generated by immunization of female BALB/c mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) with gamma-irradiated Sp2/0-Ag14 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) transfected with human CD105. Immunization was performed intraperitoneally together with CpG oligonucleotides to enhance immunogenicity. Spleen cells were then fused with Sp2/0-AG14 cells according to the protocol established by Kohler and Milstein45. Supernatants of the resulting hybridoma cells were screened by flow cytometric analysis using CD105+ NALM-16 (DMSZ, Braunschweig, Germany) and CD105-transfected Sp2/0 cells, while mock transfected Sp2/0 cells served as negative control. CD105 antibody was purified using protein A affinity chromatography.
For SDS-PAGE analysis, 3 µg of protein was diluted 1:1 with Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with or without beta-mercaptoethanol (SERVA Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany) as reducing agent. Samples were analysed on a 10% Mini-PROTEAN ® TGX™ Precast Protein Gel (Bio-Rad). Gels were stained with Roti®-Blue colloidal coomassie blue staining solution (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Antibody purity was confirmed by analytical size exclusion chromatography with a 200 Increase 10/300GL column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL).
Flow cytometry
PBMC of AML patients and healthy donors as well as different leukaemic and solid tumour cell lines (purchased from DSMZ) were incubated with human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) solution prior to staining and then washed. Unconjugated anti-CD105 mAb (clone K-ro23 and clone SN6, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) or isotype control (clone MPC-11, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) as well as the comparative anti-CD105 clone 166707 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and the respective isotype control (IgG1 isotype, clone MG1-45, BioLegend) were added at 5 nM, followed by a mouse-specific PE conjugate (1:100). AML cells were identified according to the immunophenotype obtained at diagnosis by staining for CD33, CD34, CD38 and/or CD117, and dead cells were excluded based on 7-AAD (BioLegend) positivity. Fluorescence-conjugates (CD33, CD34, CD38 and CD117, all from BioLegend) were used in 1:100–1:200 dilutions. Measurements were conducted using a FACSCanto II or a LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences) and data analysis was performed using FlowJo_V10 software (FlowJo LCC, Ashland, OR). Specific fluorescence indices (SFIs) were calculated by dividing median fluorescence obtained with anti-CD105 mAb by median fluorescence obtained with the isotype control. Expression was considered positive in case of SFI ≥ 1.5.
Cytospins and immunohistochemistry
Cytospins of ~200.000 AML cells in PBS with 1% BSA were prepared and cells were fixed with methanol for 10 minutes at −20 °C. For immunohistochemistry, cytospins were Fc-blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA + hIgG (10 µg/mL) and peroxidases were inactivated with 3% H2O2 +1% NaN3 followed by Biotin blocking system (DAKO Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Incubation with anti-CD105 (K-ro23) or respective isotype control antibodies (10 µg/mL) was performed for 2 h followed by a rabbit anti-mouse biotin F(ab‘)2 conjugate (1:200) (DAKO). After incubation with streptavidin/HRP (DAKO) (1:1000) staining was visualized by 10–30 sec exposition with DAB Chromogen system (DAKO) and subsequently counterstained with haematoxylin. Prior to an ascending ethanol preservation and Xylol treatment, cytospins were covered with Neo-Mount mounting medium (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Data are displayed as mean +/− SEM, boxplot as mean with 25% or 75% quantiles and Tukey or min/max whiskers. The 2-tailed unpaired students-t test, Mann-Whitney-/Kruskal-Wallis-test, one-way ANOVA or Fisher´s exact test were used to compare individual groups. Distribution of overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was performed to test the difference of survival between groups. For predictive cut-off value estimation, we sub-grouped CD105 SFI with respect to corresponding OS times. Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed using JMP® Pro and value of highest Youden index was used as cut-off. Cut‐off values enabled further separation of cases with better or worse prognosis, as shown e.g., in Kaplan–Meier analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.1.0 and JMP® Pro (SAS Institute Inc., Version 14.2) software. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Data availability
The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and all authors shared final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
References
Liersch, R., Müller-Tidow, C., Berdel, W. E. & Krug, U. Prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukaemia in adults–biological significance and clinical use. British journal of haematology 165, 17–38 (2014).
Grimwade, D. et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. Blood 92, 2322–2333 (1998).
Kottaridis, P. D. et al. The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood 98, 1752–1759 (2001).
DiNardo, C. D. et al. Characteristics, clinical outcome, and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in AML. American journal of hematology 90, 732–736 (2015).
Costa, A. et al. Role of new immunophenotypic markers on prognostic and overall survival of acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports 7, 4138 (2017).
Schlenk, R. F. & Döhner, K. Impact of new prognostic markers in treatment decisions in acute myeloid leukemia. Current opinion in hematology 16, 98–104 (2009).
Barbara, N. P., Wrana, J. L. & Letarte, M. Endoglin is an accessory protein that interacts with the signaling receptor complex of multiple members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 584–594 (1999).
Lebrin, F. et al. Endoglin promotes endothelial cell proliferation and TGF-β/ALK1 signal transduction. The EMBO journal 23, 4018–4028 (2004).
Gougos, A. & Letarte, M. Identification of a human endothelial cell antigen with monoclonal antibody 44G4 produced against a pre-B leukemic cell line. The Journal of Immunology 141, 1925–1933 (1988).
Fonsatti, E. et al. Endoglin: An accessory component of the TGF-β-binding receptor-complex with diagnostic, prognostic, and bioimmunotherapeutic potential in human malignancies. Journal of cellular physiology 188, 1–7 (2001).
Dallas, N. A. et al. Endoglin (CD105): a marker of tumor vasculature and potential target for therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 14, 1931–1937 (2008).
Brum, S. T. et al. Endoglin is Highly Expressed in Human Mast Cells. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology (2019).
Minhajat, R. et al. Organ-specific endoglin (CD105) expression in the angiogenesis of human cancers. Pathology international 56, 717–723 (2006).
Burrows, F. J. et al. Up-regulation of endoglin on vascular endothelial cells in human solid tumors: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Clinical cancer research 1, 1623–1634 (1995).
El-Gohary, Y. M. et al. Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in prostatic adenocarcinoma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 127, 572–579 (2007).
Saad, R. S., Jasnosz, K. M., Tung, M. Y. & Silverman, J. F. Endoglin (CD105) expression in endometrial carcinoma. International journal of gynecological pathology 22, 248–253 (2003).
Wikström, P., Lissbrant, I. F., Stattin, P., Egevad, L. & Bergh, A. Endoglin (CD105) is expressed on immature blood vessels and is a marker for survival in prostate cancer. The Prostate 51, 268–275 (2002).
Saad, R. S. et al. Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. Modern Pathology 17, 197 (2004).
Tanaka, F. et al. Evaluation of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison between anti-CD34 antibody and anti-CD105 antibody. Clinical Cancer Research 7, 3410–3415 (2001).
Dales, J.-P. et al. CD105 expression is a marker of high metastatic risk and poor outcome in breast carcinomas: correlations between immunohistochemical analysis and long-term follow-up in a series of 929 patients. American journal of clinical pathology 119, 374–380 (2003).
Cosimato, V. et al. Surface endoglin (CD105) expression on acute leukemia blast cells: an extensive flow cytometry study of 1002 patients. Leukemia lymphoma 59, 2242–2245 (2018).
Chakhachiro, Z. I. et al. CD105 (endoglin) is highly overexpressed in a subset of cases of acute myeloid leukemias. American journal of clinical pathology 140, 370–378 (2013).
Della Porta, M. et al. Flow cytometry evaluation of erythroid dysplasia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 20, 549 (2006).
O’Donnell, M. R. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia, version 3.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 15, 926–957 (2017).
Dohner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 115, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358 (2010).
Lastres, P. et al. Regulated expression on human macrophages of endoglin, an Arg-Gly-Asp-containing surface antigen. European journal of immunology 22, 393–397 (1992).
Goldberg, S. L., Noel, P., Klumpp, T. R. & Dewald, G. W. The erythroid leukemias: a comparative study of erythroleukemia (FAB M6) and Di Guglielmo disease. Am J Clin Oncol 21, 42–47 (1998).
Drexler, H. G. Classification of acute myeloid leukemias–a comparison of FAB and immunophenotyping. Leukemia 1, 697–705 (1987).
Segeren, C. M. & van ‘t Veer, M. B. The FAB classification for acute myeloid leukaemia–is it outdated? Neth J Med 49, 126–131 (1996).
Cuneo, A. et al. Cytogenetic profile of minimally differentiated (FAB M0) acute myeloid leukemia: correlation with clinicobiologic findings. Blood 85, 3688–3694 (1995).
Goumans, M.-J., Liu, Z. & Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β signaling in vascular biology and dysfunction. Cell research 19, 116 (2009).
Valeria, B., Maddalena, G., Enrica, V., Onofrio, T. & Gaetano, B. Endoglin (CD105) expression in the human heart throughout gestation: an immunohistochemical study. Reproductive Sciences 15, 1018–1026 (2008).
Choe, G.-S., Bae, M.-G., Jeong, J.-W., Mun, H.-E. & Kim, G.-W. Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis during carcinogenesis. BMB Reports 36, 120–127 (2003).
Li, C. et al. CD105 prevents apoptosis in hypoxic endothelial cells. Journal of cell science 116, 2677–2685 (2003).
Xu, P., Wang, M., Jiang, Y., Ouyang, J. & Chen, B. The association between expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α and multi-drug resistance of acute myeloid leukemia. Translational Cancer Research 6, 198–205 (2017).
Pierelli, L. et al. CD34+/CD105+ cells are enriched in primitive circulating progenitors residing in the G0 phase of the cell cycle and contain all bone marrow and cord blood CD34+/CD38low/− precursors. British journal of haematology 108, 610–620 (2000).
Chen, C.-Z. et al. Identification of endoglin as a functional marker that defines long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 15468–15473 (2002).
Borges, L., Oliveira, V. K., Baik, J., Bendall, S. C. & Perlingeiro, R. C. Serial transplantation reveals a critical role for endoglin in hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Blood 133, 688–696 (2019).
Dourado, K. M. et al. Endoglin: a novel target for therapeutic intervention in acute leukemias revealed in xenograft mouse models. Blood 129, 2526–2536 (2017).
Apolo, A. B. et al. A phase II clinical trial of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) in adults with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Clinical genitourinary cancer 15, 77–85 (2017).
Duffy, A. G. et al. Phase I and preliminary phase II study of TRC105 in combination with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 23, 4633–4641 (2017).
Attia, S. et al. A phase 1b dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-Endoglin antibody) in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). J Clin Oncol 33, 158 (2015).
Bennett, J. M. et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Annals of internal medicine 103, 620–625 (1985).
Bennett, J. M. et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias French-American-British (FAB) Co-operative Group. British journal of haematology 33, 451–458 (1976).
Kohler, G. & Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495–497 (1975).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ilona Hagelstein and Stefanie Müller for expert technical assistance. We are also grateful for the important advice by David Heinzmann, MD, regarding immunohistochemistry. This work was supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA1360/7-3 to HRS), Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (2007.115.3 to HRS), Deutsche Krebshilfe (111828 and 70112914 to HRS, 70113496 to MM) and Germany’s Excellence Strategy (EXC 2180/1). We acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tuebingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.R.S., M.M., J.H. and J.K. designed research. K.S. and G.J. generated the antibody. J.K. and C.T. performed and analysed flow cytometry experiments. M.M., J.H., C.T. and C.H. performed immunohistochemistry. M.R., J.H. and C.H. collected clinical data. J.H. and C.H. performed statistical analyses. J.K., J.H., H.R.S. and M.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors read, revised and accepted the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kauer, J., Schwartz, K., Tandler, C. et al. CD105 (Endoglin) as negative prognostic factor in AML. Sci Rep 9, 18337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54767-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54767-x
This article is cited by
-
Induction of NK cell reactivity against acute myeloid leukemia by Fc-optimized CD276 (B7-H3) antibody
Blood Cancer Journal (2024)
-
Identification of CD105 (endoglin) as novel risk marker in CLL
Annals of Hematology (2022)
-
DNAM-1/CD226 is functionally expressed on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells and is associated with favorable prognosis
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
CD105 (endoglin) as risk marker in AML patients undergoing stem cell transplantation
International Journal of Hematology (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.