Abstract
Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) with putative regulatory functions in gene expression have been identified in the enteropathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). Two sRNAs are encoded by the genomic island GEI4417/4436 responsible for myo-inositol (MI) degradation, suggesting a role in the regulation of this metabolic pathway. We show that a lack of the sRNA STnc2160, termed RssR, results in a severe growth defect in minimal medium (MM) with MI. In contrast, the second sRNA STnc1740 was induced in the presence of glucose, and its overexpression slightly attenuated growth in the presence of MI. Constitutive expression of RssR led to an increased stability of the reiD mRNA, which encodes an activator of iol genes involved in MI utilization, via interaction with its 5′-UTR. SsrB, a response regulator contributing to the virulence properties of salmonellae, activated rssR transcription by binding the sRNA promoter. In addition, the absence of the RNA chaperone Hfq resulted in strongly decreased levels of RssR, attenuated S. Typhimurium growth with MI, and reduced expression of several iol genes required for MI degradation. Considered together, the extrinsic RssR allows fine regulation of cellular ReiD levels and thus of MI degradation by acting on the reiD mRNA stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) infects both animal and human hosts, and it is a major cause of diseases, including enteric fever, gastroenteritis, bacteraemia and systemic infection. S. Typhimurium is mainly transmitted by contaminated food, such as egg and its products, poultry, and pork. In mice, this pathogen evokes a disseminated infection that serves as a model for human typhoid fever. During infection, S. Typhimurium is challenged by various physical, biochemical, or cellular barriers such as low pH, bile, antimicrobial peptides, colonization resistance or phagocytes1,2,3. These stress conditions are overcome by specific virulence factors that have been characterized in detail, including those encoded by the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) or 2 (SPI-2) that are responsible for epithelial cell invasion, and survival and replication within non-phagocytic host cells or professional phagocytes4,5,6,7.
However, much less emphasis has been put on to the metabolic capacities of S. Typhimurium as a prerequisite for successful survival and proliferation in environments such as soil, food or host compartments that are characterized by variable or limited availability of nutrients8,9,10,11,12,13. An example of a metabolic pathway that facilitates recovery from nutrient deprivation is the capability of certain S. enterica strains to use myo-inositol (MI) as the sole carbon and energy source14,15. MI is a polyol abundant in soil and within body compartments of mammals including the bloodstream16, and it is an important building block for phosphatidylinositol and other membrane molecules of eukaryotes. The phosphorylated form of MI, inositol hexakisphosphate or phytate, serves as a phosphorus storage form in plants; however, this form can only be utilized by livestock in the presence of bacterial phytases. Species within the genera Bacillus, Klebsiella, Corynebacterium, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, and Pseudomonas are known to carry iol genes required for MI degradation, suggesting an origin of this specific metabolic property in soil bacteria17,18. In S. Typhimurium, the iol genes are located on a 22.6-kb genomic island (GEI4417/4436) (Fig. 1A). In vivo screening identified iol genes as candidate genes under selection during the oral infection of mice, pigs, chicken and calves19,20,21,22.
A unique feature of S. Typhimurium growth under standard laboratory conditions on minimal medium (MM) with MI is the long lag phase of approximately two days that can be strongly reduced by the deletion of iolR, whose product represses most iol genes. There is a strong selection pressure on a high binding affinity of IolR to its target promoters, because untimely expression of the iol genes during growth in rich medium and in the absence of IolR results in a high economic burden for S. Typhimurium23. The lag phase is also shortened by the addition of bicarbonate17,24; large amount of this electrolyte is secreted by the proximal duodenum25,26 and might serve as an in vivo signal to trigger MI degradation. During growth on solid MM medium with MI, strain 14028 exhibits a reversible bistable phenotype; however, this phenotype is absent in iolR-negative strains and in the presence of bicarbonate24. The phenotypic bistability is characterized by two subpopulations that consist of either proliferating or nongrowing cells. This phenomenon, which is accompagnied by a hysteresis effect, could be correlated with the activity of one of the iol promoters (PiolE) that in the presence of MI switches from the “off” to the “on” status by an as yet unknown mechanism24,27.
However, the complex regulation of the iol genes in vitro or in vivo is not yet fully understood. Recently, we identified ReiD, which is encoded by an orphan gene (STM4423) and is unique to S. Typhimurium strains capable of using MI. ReiD is a regulator that acts as a DNA-binding protein to induce the expression of several iol genes, thus contributing to the regulation of MI degradation by S. Typhimurium14. ReiD stimulates the transcription of PiolE, the promoter of the iolE/iolG1 (STM4424/STM4425) operon that encodes the first two enzymes of the MI degradation pathway. Gene reiD is also known to be significantly induced in a mouse enteritis model, but not in the typhoid fever mouse model28. Interestingly, mutants with a transposon insertion between the MI transporter gene iolT2 (STM4419) and iolB (STM4420) encoding an isomerase involved in MI utilization, were found to be attenuated in pig, chicken and calf oral infection models21. RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and Hfq-Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) identified the presence of two small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) within that intergenic region, suggesting that they might be responsible for the reported attenuation29,30,31. As many sRNAs are important and versatile regulatory elements that are involved in numerous cellular processes, including carbon metabolism and virulence in enteric bacteria32,33, we investigated the role of the GEI4417/4436-encoded sRNAs STnc1740 and RssR (STnc2160) in regulating MI catabolism. The present study shows that STnc1740 and RssR negatively and positively, respectively, influence the growth properties of S. Typhimurium using MI as carbon and energy source. We also provide strong experimental evidence that RssR interacts with and stabilizes the mRNA of reiD, and that its own transcription can be induced by the virulence regulator SsrB. The results suggest that RssR in particular contributes to the metabolic adaptation of S. Typhimurium under nutrient-limited conditions.
Results
Identification of two small RNAs located in GEI4417/4436
An RNA-seq-based transcriptomic analysis recently identified 280 sRNAs in S. Typhimurium strain 4/74. Among them are the two contiguous sRNAs STnc1740 and STnc2160 with a predicted length of 180 and 69 nucleotides, respectively (Fig. 1B)29,30. The sequences of both sRNAs are identical in the common laboratory strains LT-2, SL1344, 4/74, and 14028, and are encoded within the genomic island GEI4417/4436 that harbors the genes that are required for MI utilization. Both sRNAs are therefore proposed to play a role in the regulation of this metabolic capacity. When measured under 22 distinct in vitro growth conditions, STnc2160 was only strongly upregulated following anaerobic shock, whereas STnc1740 was expressed under most of the growth conditions30. STnc2160 is located in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of iolB and partially overlaps with the coding region of iolB, whereas STnc1740 lies in the intergenic region between iolB and iolT2 (Fig. 1B). Due to the experimental results outlined below, we termed STnc2160 as “RssR” for reiD mRNA-stabilizing small RNA. Its sequence is present (sequence identity 100%) in all the 46 Salmonella genome sequences that also carry reiD, but absent in the 23 genomes lacking this regulatory gene14.
Presence of RssR and STnc1740 in mutant strains
To investigate the roles of RssR and STnc1740 in MI metabolism in strain 14028, we first studied the expressions of the two sRNAs in MM with MI or glucose as the sole carbon source. Northern blotting with a riboprobe complementary to rssR against total RNA isolated from S. Typhimurium 14028 cells grown to the exponential phase in MM with MI revealed a prominent hybridization signal with a size of ~70 nucleotides in MM with MI (Fig. 2A, left). This finding is in agreement with earlier data obtained from cells grown in rich medium until the early stationary phase29. Remarkably, RssR was highly expressed only in S. Typhimurium cells grown with MI, but not detected at all in the presence of glucose. Using the same RNA sample, we detected two distinct hybridization signals using a probe against STnc1740 (~150 and ~100 nucleotides) (Fig. 2B, left). This finding suggests the presence of two promoters for STnc1740 and is in agreement with two transcriptional start sites (TSS) that were identified by differential RNA-seq set apart by a 43-bp distance30. In clear contrast to the rssR transcript, the expression of the smaller transcript of STnc1740 was significantly higher in MM with glucose than in MM with MI, whereas the expression of the longer transcript was unaffected by the carbon source added.
Northern blots probing for rssR expression were then performed with RNA isolated from the mutants 14028 ΔrssR, 14028 Δhfq, 14028 ΔssrB, 14028 ΔSTnc1740 and 14028 ΔiolR grown in MI medium (Fig. 2A, right). We detected no hybridization signal in 14028 ΔrssR and only very low amounts of RssR in 14028 Δhfq (see below), whereas RssR was present in the RNA isolated from strains 14028 ΔssrB, 14028 ΔSTnc1740 and 14028 ΔiolR. RNA samples of the same strains were also tested with a STnc1740 probe, and this sRNA was found to be present in 14028 ΔrssR, 14028 ΔssrB, and 14028 ΔiolR, but to be drastically reduced in mutant 14028 Δhfq (see below) (Fig. 2B, right) and absent in 14028 ΔSTnc1740. We hypothesized that RssR, which is encoded by a gene located at the 3′-UTR region of iolB, can be generated either by transcription from its own promoter located within the coding region of iolB or by processing from the iolB mRNA via RNaseE31,34. To address this point, we used strain LT2 rneTS (MA3409) in which the RNaseE is active at 28 °C, but not at 44 °C35. Strains LT2 (MA9816)and LT2 rneTS were grown in MI medium at 28 °C until OD600 = 0.3 and then further incubated at 44 °C for one hour. The data shown in Fig. S1 demonstrate that in the strain with restricted RNase E activity, the number of fragments that hybridize with the RssR riboprobe is increased compared to the wild-type strain, indicating reduced RNA degradation in the rneTS mutant of the iolB mRNA. Notably, the 60–70 nt RssR band visible in strain 14028 is much less pronounced in the rneTS mutant, suggesting that RssR is processed from a longer transcript. However, our data do not distinguish whether mature RssR is processed from the iolB mRNA or from a longer precursor RssR transcript originating from within the iolB coding region, and a 5′RACE experiment was unsuccessful to confirm the predicted rssR transcriptional start site shown in Fig. 1.
sRNAs influence the growth behavior of S. Typhimurium in myo-inositol medium
We then tested a possible impact of RssR and STnc1740 on MI utilization by S. Typhimurium strain 14028. The doubling time of 14028 ∆rssR during growth in lysogeny broth (LB) medium did not significantly differ from that of the parental strain (Table S1). However, in MM with MI, the mutant showed a significantly (p ≤ 0.01) lower division rate [ν(∆rssR) = 0.130 h−1 ± 0.030] in MM with MI compared to that of strain 14028 [ν = 0.310 h−1 ± 0.090], and a longer lag phase (Fig. 3A). In the case of 14028, the presence of plasmid pZE-control carrying a noncoding 17 bp-fragment (Table S2) resulted in a higher maximal optical density at 600 nm (OD600) in comparison with the other strains. When we constitutively expressed RssR in the mutant from the plasmid pZE-rssR to compensate for the lack of RssR, the division rate of this strain [ν(∆rssR/pZE-rssR) = 0.261 h−1 ± 0.010] and the lag phase were restored to nearly that of strain 14028. A similar result was obtained for 14028 carrying the complementing construct [ν(pZE-rssR) = 0.261 h−1 ± 0.017]. The successful complementation also suggests that the deletion of rssR does not significantly compromise iolB expression and function that is an essential gene for MI degradation. Taken together, these data indicate that RssR positively affects utilization of MI as the sole carbon and energy source.
In LB medium, the doubling times of 14028 ΔSTnc1740 and of 14028 ΔSTnc1740/pZE-STnc1740 with in trans expression of this sRNA were identical to that of parental strain 14028 (Table S1). During growth with MI, the doubling time of 14028 ΔSTnc1740 [td (∆STnc1740) = 3.01 h ± 11.6%] did not differ significantly from that of strain 14028 [td (14028) = 3.15 h ± 16.4%] (Fig. 3B), whereas that of strain 14028/pZE-STnc1740 overexpressing this sRNA [td (pZE-STnc1740) = 4.74 h ± 15.6%] is significantly increased in comparison with the other two strains (p < 0.001). In addition, the absence of STnc1740 shortens, and its in trans expression prolongs the lag phase during growth with MI. These data indicate that STnc1740, in contrast to RssR, inhibits the growth rate of S. Typhimurium 14028, although pleiotropic effects caused by STnc1740 overproduction cannot be excluded.
When testing the growth phenotype of the double mutant 14028 ∆rssR ΔSTnc1740, we observed a slightly but significantly higher division rate [ν(ΔrssR ∆STnc1740) = 0.26 h ± 0.016%] compared to that of strain 14028 [ν(14028) = 0.21 h ± 0.004%; p < 0.01] (Fig. 3C). Subsequently, we focused our investigation on RssR due to its more distinct effect on S. Typhimurium growth with MI.
RssR increases reiD mRNA levels
As shown above, deletion as well as constitutive in trans expression of RssR results in growth phenotypes of S. Typhimurium in MM with MI. This finding led to the assumption that RssR regulates an mRNA encoded on GEI4417/4436. To test this hypothesis, the luciferase reporter cassette luxCDABE was chromosomally fused to the end of each polycistronic iol operon or iol gene essential for MI degradation as determined previously17. The resulting strains (Table S2) were then equipped with plasmid pZE-rssR to allow constitutive expression of RssR. Changes of the luciferase activity of the constructs were not detected in strains with pZE-rssR in comparison with those with the control plasmid pZE-control (data not shown), except strain 14028 reiD::lux. Here a 12.4-fold increase of bioluminescence with respect to the control was observed (Fig. 4). Strain 14028 PreiD::lux harboring a luxCDABE fusion to the region upstream of the reiD start codon showed only a marginal, but significant signal increase. Due to these data, we hypothesize that RssR stabilizes the mRNA transcript of reiD.
Deletion of rssR destabilizes the mRNA of reiD
To further investigate the putative function of RssR in stabilizing the mRNA of reiD, strains 14028 and 14028 ∆rssR were cultivated in MM with MI to an OD of 0.3, and transcription was halted by adding 500 µg/mL rifampicin. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) against reiD, and as a control, iolT2 transcripts, was performed, and the data were normalized to the 16S rRNA detection level. Comparing the values obtained for time points 2 min before and 8 min after the transcriptional stop, we calculated a 13.5-fold decay of the reiD mRNA isolated from 14028 within these 10 min. However, the reiD mRNA obtained from mutant 14028 ∆rssR showed a 55.6-fold reduction (p ≤ 0.01), clearly suggesting that RssR indeed slows down the degradation of the reiD mRNA, indicating a specific effect of RssR on the reiD transcript stability (Fig. 5A). We then complemented deletion strain 14028 ∆rssR with the plasmid pZE-rssR, and detected an only 4.05-fold reduction of the reiD mRNA amount. Thus, the constitutive in trans expression of RssR compensated the chromosomal lack of rssR and led to a significantly higher stability of the reiD mRNA in strain 14028 ∆rssR/pZE-rssR in comparison with the deletion mutant (p < 0.01). No significant difference between the samples of the three strains was observed when qRT-PCR against the transcript of the control gene iolT2 was performed, excluding that the overexpression or deletion of RssR affects the stability of cellular RNA in general.
Interaction of RssR and the reiD mRNA
We then applied the two-plasmid-system pXG-10(sf) and pZE12-luc (Table S2) to measure the stability of the reiD mRNA in the presence of RssR via green fluorescent protein (GFP) production36,37. The UTR 5′-sequence and the coding region of gene reiD were cloned into pXG-10(sf), resulting in a translational coupling of gfp to reiD; the recombinant protein was controlled by the constitutive PLtetO promoter. The rssR gene was cloned into pZE12-luc downstream of the constitutive PLlacO promoter. Following transformation of both plasmids into strain 14028, the fluorescence was measured during growth in LB medium for 8 h until the cells reached the stationary phase. A significant higher fluorescence of strain 14028/pXG-reiD/pZE-rssR in comparison with strain 14028/pXG-reiD/pZE-control suggested a stabilizing function of RssR for the reiD mRNA (data not shown). To narrow the sequence relevant for interaction, we cloned the first 150 bp following the TSS of reiD into pXG-10(sf), resulting in pXG-reiDshort (pXG-reiDs). Again, we observed a significantly, up to 2.67-fold higher fluorescence relative to the control (Fig. 5B).
To further validate the RssR-reiD interaction, we performed a binding kinetic analysis via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy. Biotinylated RssR was bound on a sensor chip and tested with two RNA-oligonucleotides representing the 5′-UTR of reiD (UTRreiD) and the nucleotides 20 to 80 of the reiD coding region (intrareiD)(Fig. 6A). Oligonucleotide UTRreiD was demonstrated to specifically and stably interact with RssR with an overall affinity of 5.7 nM and a high association (1.9 × 104/M*s) and low dissociation rate (1.1 × 10−4/s), whereas no binding was detected with oligonucleotide intrareiD (Fig. 6B).
To identify the 5′-UTR nucleotides most relevant for the interaction with RssR, a reiD 5′-UTR/RssR duplex structure was predicted, and at least seven potential binding regions between the two RNA-molecules were found. Six of them were pairwise mutated (Fig. 6C), and the resulting RNA-oligonucleotides Mut1UTRreiD, Mut2UTRreiD and Mut3UTRreiD were tested for binding to RssR via SPR spectroscopy. RssR showed a binding affinity to Mut3UTRreiD similar to that to the parental sequences (9.5 nM), although the maximal binding response was two-fold reduced (Fig. 6D). In contrast, the interaction strength of RssR with Mut1UTRreiD was strongly reduced (167 nM) due to lower association (8.2 × 102/M*s) and lower dissociation constants (1.3 × 10−3/s). Furthermore, the maximal binding response was approximately four-fold reduced. Only weak binding of RssR to Mut2UTRreiD was observed, with an overall affinity of 2.7 µM. The binding stoichiometries of a least 4:1 UTRreiD to RssR, of 2:1 for Mut3UTRreiD and of 1:1 for Mut2UTRreiD, depended on the maximal response of the respective sensorgrams, might be due to a different self-binding or oligomerization of the different UTRreiD derivatives or caused by a different number of binding sites on RssR for the respective UTRreiD derivative. The putative secondary structure of RssR is shown in Fig. 6E. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that RssR stabilizes the mRNA of reiD by direct interaction. We hypothesize that the nucleotide mismatches in Mut2UTRreiD predominately contribute to this interaction, because the binding sites tested with Mut1UTRreiD belong to the putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence of reiD.
SsrB binds and induces expression of PrssR
A genome wide ChIP-on-chip approach identified an intragenic SsrB binding site that is located 70 bp upstream of rssR and thus within the coding region of iolB38, and analysis with a promoter prediction program39 accordingly found evidence for a TSS immediately behind this region (Fig. 1B). This finding prompted us to validate a putative interaction of SsrB with the promoter of rssR (PrssR), and we constructed pBAD-ssrBc encoding the C-terminus of ssrB. SsrBc was chosen here, as this domain is constitutively active and binds DNA without conformational activation by SsrA (SpiR)40. As a positive control, the reporter strain 14028 sseA::lux carrying a chromosomal fusion of the luciferase reporter with sseA was equipped with pBAD-ssrBc. The luminescence activity in strain 14028 sseA::lux/pBAD-ssrBc increased from 6.6 × 103 relative light units (RLU)/OD600 [±5.9%] in the absence of inducer, to 6.4 × 106 RLU/OD600 [±1.4%] in the presence of 1 mM arabinose, demonstrating the functionality of SsrBc. Reporter strains 14028 PrssR::lux, 14028 reiD::lux, and 14028 PiolE::lux were then transformed with pBAD-ssrBc and, as a control, with plasmid pBAD-HisA(TetR) lacking ssrBc, and bioluminescence measurements were performed in the absence and the presence of arabinose. Figure 7A shows that the transcriptional activity of PrssR::lux and reiD::lux was approximately 13-fold and 155-fold induced following SsrBc overproduction, respectively, whereas such an effect was not observed in the absence of arabinose or with control strain 14028/pBAD-HisA(TetR) nor with the PiolE-reporter strain.
To validate this finding, SsrBc was overexpressed from pBAD-ssrBc in Escherichia coli KB3, purified and used for gel mobility shift assays (GMSAs). The promoter of sseA served as positive control and that of argS as a competitive DNA17,41. The GMSAs shown in Fig. 7B demonstrate that SsrBc binds PrssR at approximately the same molar ratio as the positive control PsseA. The specificity of this interaction was further demonstrated by an additional bandshift experiment in which SsrBc failed to bind the promoter of the regulatory gene reiD. Equal amounts of RssR were detected in a Northern blot performed with RNA samples isolated from 14028 and its ssrB deletion mutant grown in MM/MI (Fig. 2B), suggesting that SsrB stimulates rssR transcription under distinct, SsrB-inducing conditions, for example those encountered during infection or biofilm formation42,43. Considered together, we conclude that activated SsrB can specifically bind PrssR and induces transcription of rssR, but is not essential for the expression of RssR in MM with MI.
Deletion of hfq results in a severe growth defect of S. Typhimurium in MI medium
The RNA chaperone Hfq is known to affect the stability of sRNAs and their annealing with mRNAs44. In contrast to STnc1740, RssR is strongly bound by the RNA chaperone Hfq at position 56–68 including its terminator45. Accordingly, the lack of RssR in the hfq-mutant suggests an sRNA-stabilizing interaction of RssR and Hfq (Fig. 1B). The association of RssR with Hfq suggests that this sRNA posttranscriptionally regulates the expression of mRNA targets potentially transcribed from GEI4417/4436. To investigate the influence of Hfq on the MI metabolism of S. Typhimurium, the deletion mutant 14028 ∆hfq was constructed, and its growth behavior was monitored. In LB broth, the hfq minus strain exhibited a slightly reduced growth rate as compared to the parental strain [td (14028) = 0.91 h ± 6.7%; td (14028∆hfq) = 0.97 h ± 2.2%], and a lag phase prolonged by a few hours (Fig. 8A). Strain 14028 ∆hfq also showed a weaker total growth as it reached a maximal OD600 ~ 0.8 in comparison with OD600 ~ 1.0 measured for 14028, probably due to a pleiotropic effect of this mutation. The phenotype of the parental strain was restored by providing plasmid pStHfq-6H.
However, during growth with MI, we observed a more severe growth attenuation of the hfq mutant that showed a significantly longer doubling time [td(14028∆hfq) = 8.85 h ± 3.2%] as compared to that of strain 14028 [td (14028) = 3.87 h ± 3.4%] (Fig. 8B). In these experiments, which were performed in microtiter plates, the final OD600 of the mutant was also reduced from OD600 ~ 0.60 to OD600 ~ 0.38. Moreover, the lag phase of 14028 (55 h) was strongly reduced to approximately 37 h by deletion of hfq. The deletion of hfq was successfully complemented by plasmid pStHfq-6H, as growth of 14028 ∆hfq/pStHfq-6H was very similar to that of the parental strain (Fig. 8B). The lack of RssR in strain 14028 ∆hfq during growth in MM with MI (Fig. 2B) further suggests that the growth impairment of this mutant is due to a reduced expression and/or stability of RssR. This is in agreement with RNA-seq results showing a 4.3-fold down-regulation of RssR in a S. Typhimurium strain 4/74 Δhfq mutant grown in LB medium to the early stationary phase46.
To shed further light on the role of Hfq in the regulation of the MI degradation pathway, we fused the luciferase reporter behind 10 iol genes or operons within strain 14028 ∆hfq and monitored their bioluminescence profile in comparison with that of the corresponding fusions in strain 14028 during growth in MM with MI. Remarkably, the luciferase activity of all but two translational fusions significantly decreased by hfq deletion (Fig. 9). The exceptions were iolT2::lux encoding a minor inositol transporter47 with equal transcription in both strains, and iolR::lux with slightly elevated activity. The strongest response, namely an approximately 14-fold decrease of transcriptional activity, was observed for the iolD2::lux fusion, and even the transcription of the MI-transporter gene iolT1 showed a twofold reduction. A negative effect of the hfq deletion on construct reiD::lux was also observed. Taken together, these data are compatible with the fact that Hfq interacts with RssR that then stabilizes the mRNA of reiD whose product is the main activator of iol genes14.
Discussion
It is generally accepted that bacterial sRNAs are regulators of gene expression and perform a broad range of physiological functions. In contrast to the cis-encoded antisense RNAs, trans-encoded sRNAs typically range from 50 to 300 nucleotides, and exhibit only imperfect complementarity with their RNA target48,49. Two modes of action by which those noncoding RNAs modulate gene expression are most common. One class of sRNAs can directly interact with a protein to modify its activity50,51, whereas the other base-pairs imperfectly in an Hfq-dependent manner with cognate mRNA targets and thus inhibits initiation by masking the ribosomal binding site followed by mRNA destabilization via RNAse E, or liberate a sequestered RBS, a mechanism termed anti-antisense that results in translational activation44,52. In S. Typhimurium, sRNAs play important roles in regulating virulence and metabolic properties32. Examples of the latter category are the control of amino acid metabolism including the branched chain amino acids via GcvB53, the role of SgrS in glucose homeostasis54,55,56,57, and uptake of chitin-derived oligosaccharides involving ChiX35.
Recently, a detailed transcriptome analysis of S. Typhimurium growing in a set of environmental, stress or gut mimicking conditions revealed the expression of 280 sRNAs30. However, the functional characterization of many remains incomplete. Here, we present the characterization of a sRNA termed RssR that is involved in the regulation of the MI degradation pathway in S. Typhimurium. We found that the sRNA RssR, whose gene rssR overlaps with the coding region and the 3′-UTR of iolB, probably interacts with and stabilizes the mRNA of reiD via interaction with the 5′-UTR, thus controlling the expression of this regulatory gene at the posttranscriptional level. Examples of sRNAs that activate gene expression upon interaction with a target mRNA by stemloop formation and via the 5′-UTR have been described52,58. However, we do not exclude the possibility that the phenotypes observed in this study are the indirect results from translation stimulation of reiD by sequestration of an anti-Shine Dalgarno sequence59. In comparison with a strain lacking RssR, the presence of RssR results in a higher abundance of ReiD mRNA. The regulator then induces the genes iolE/iolG1 that are essential for MI degradation and encode the first enzymes of this pathway. Therefore, RssR positively regulates MI utilization by targeting reiD and promotes growth of S. Typhimurium in environments with MI as a carbon and energy source. Although the deletion of sRNA STnc1740 has a less prominent growth effect in comparison with that of RssR, its growth phenotype indicates that STnc1740 counteracts the effect of RssR by a yet unknown mechanism.
There is increasing evidence that the capacity to degrade MI might contribute to the survival, colonization and growth of S. Typhimurium in several hosts14,19,20,21,28,60. Interestingly, a transposon-directed insertion-site sequencing (TraDIS) application identified a transposon mutation in rssR to attenuate S. Typhimurium growth following oral infection of calves, chickens, and pigs21. The long lag phase of S. Typhimurium during growth with MI might place doubt on the possible relevance of MI utilization during infection. However, the tight regulation of this metabolic pathway can in part be overcome by bicarbonate, which is present in the gastrointestinal tract as demonstrated recently24. Alternatively, as hypothesized here, the MI metabolism might be supported by the common virulence regulator SsrB. SsrB has also been identified to induce srfJ that is located on the MI degradation island41,61,62. Together with the sensor SsrA (SpiR), the response regulator SsrB forms a two-component system that is responsible for the induction of the SPI-2 located type III secretion system and effector proteins essential for survival in macrophages63. In our study, we confirm the observation that SsrB binds to a site within GEI4417/443638, namely the rssR promoter, and demonstrate that SsrB can activate the novel sRNA RssR, but is not required for RssR expression in medium with MI as sole carbon and energy source. SsrB induction has been linked to expression in macrophages and recently in its unphosphorylated form to biofilm formation43, whereas MI utilization is not induced inside macrophages64,65. However, recent studies show that the SsrB-regulated SPI-2 genes are already expressed in the gut lumen66,67 where the expression of iol genes might additionally be favored by the presence of bicarbonate. Our data suggest that mature RssR is produced by processing of the iolB mRNA or of an RssR precursor RNA that is transcribed from its own promoter(s) within the iolB coding region by SsrB and/or other regulatory factors, or both. As SsrB binding to a site within iolB might impair transcription of this gene, we hypothesize an only temporary interaction to stimulate the activation of the MI degradation pathway.
The expressions of almost a fifth of all S. Typhimurium genes are controlled by the RNA-binding protein Hfq that facilitates the efficient stabilization and annealing of small, regulatory RNAs to their cognate mRNA targets upon direct interaction31,44,49,68. The Hfq regulon not only includes genes involved in pathogenicity or the flagellar cascade, but also those involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, in the metabolism of amino acids, nitrogen, purine and pyrimidine, or sugar uptake and utilization68. The postulated binding of RssR by Hfq31 prompted us to study the effect of an hfq mutant on MI degradation. We demonstrate that in a rich medium, strain 14028 ∆hfq showed a weaker total growth than strain 14028, as similarly observed previously in minimal acidic medium, indicating that Hfq controls the regulation of growth rate69. However, such a pleiotropic effect was not observed with a hfq deletion mutant of strain SL134470, a distinction that might be strain-specific or due to the growth conditions. More intriguingly, a lack of Hfq resulted in a severe growth defect of S. Typhimurium in MM with MI, and we hypothesize that the overall reduced transcription of most iol genes in the hfq mutant contributes to this phenotype, although pleiotropic effects of the Hfq deletion cannot be excluded. Similar to a iolR deletion, a lack of Hfq reduces the lag phase in the presence of MI by many hours, suggesting that Hfq acts on the cellular levels of IolR. Lower amounts of IolR result in an earlier expression of catabolic iol genes, thus shortening the lag phase in MI medium. Deletion of Hfq under non-inducing conditions of the iol genes, such as early stationary phase or LB medium, was recently shown to up-regulate catabolic iol genes46, pointing to a yet unknown, additional regulatory mechanism that fine-regulates the IolR repressor. The co-immunoprecipitation results with Hfq31 and the reduction of the cellular level of RssR by the hfq deletion indicate that Hfq binds and thus stabilizes RssR. In parenthesis, a contrary finding has recently been reported for Hfq of Yersinia enterocolitica that represses the utilization of several substrates including MI71.
Taken together, we identified the positive contribution of sRNA RssR to the regulation of the MI utilization pathway by stabilization of the mRNA of the activator ReiD. RssR is probably an extrinsic RNA as it regulates the translation of a non-overlapping gene. Our data also suggest that the virulence regulator SsrB may control MI degradation via increasing the abundance of RssR, and thus of reiD mRNA, and possibly triggers the activation of this metabolic pathway during infection of the gastrointestinal tract. Together with hydrogen carbonate, a gut compound that reduces the lag phase of the MI utilization pathway, this regulatory mechanism allows a timely response to changing conditions. The findings presented here support the important role of RssR in fine-regulating MI degradation by S. Typhimurium.
Methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in the present study are listed in Table S2. S. Typhimurium and E. coli cultures were grown in liquid or solid LB medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl) or MM [M9 medium supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 55.5 mM (1% wt/vol) MI or 27.8 mM (0.5% wt/vol) glucose]. For plasmid maintenance, the different media were supplemented with the following antibiotics: ampicillin (150 μg/mL), kanamycin (50 µg/mL), tetracycline (12 µg/mL) or chloramphenicol (20 µg/mL). For solid media, 1.5% agar (w/v) was added. For all growth and promoter probe experiments, bacterial strains were grown in appropriate medium overnight at 37 °C and then diluted 1:1,000 in liquid growth medium. Growth curves were derived from bacterial cultures incubated at 37 °C in 250 mL flasks with 50 mL medium or in 100-well plates using Bioscreen C (iLF bioserve, Langenau, Germany). The OD600 was measured at different time intervals as indicated. An amount of 1 mM (0.2% wt/vol) L(+) arabinose was used to stimulate the expression of genes cloned in pBAD/HisA(TetR).
Standard procedures
The manipulation and isolation of chromosomal or plasmid DNA were performed according to standard protocols72 and following the manufacturers’ instructions. Vector cloning was performed with E. coli strain TOP10. Plasmid DNA was transformed via electroporation using a Bio-Rad Gene pulser II as recommended by the manufacturer and as described previously73. PCRs were conducted using Taq polymerase (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). As a template for PCR, chromosomal DNA, plasmid DNA, or cells from a single colony were used. The oligonucleotides synthesized for PCRs are listed in Table S3. S. Typhimurium gene numbers refer to the LT2 annotation (NC 003197). The student’s t-test was applied for statistical evaluations. The RNAhybrid tool was applied for the in silico prediction of sRNA/RNA hybridization74.
Construction of deletion mutants and recombinant plasmids
Deletion mutants of STnc1740, rssR and hfq (STM5242) were constructed using the λ-Red recombinase75. Briefly, PCR products containing the kanamycin resistance cassette of plasmid pKD4 and the flanking FRT sites were generated using primers of 70 nucleotides in length that included 20 nucleotides priming sequences for pKD4 as template DNA. The fragments were transformed into S. Typhimurium strain 14028 cells harboring plasmid pKD46, and the allelic replacement of the target gene was controlled by PCR. Nonpolar deletion mutants were obtained by transformation of pCP20, and were validated by PCR analysis and DNA sequencing. The sequences of STnc1740 and hfq were precisely deleted, whereas in the case of mutant 14028 ΔrssR, the first 18 nucleotides of rssR overlapping with iolB remained in the chromosome.
For constitutive expression, sRNAs were cloned using the pZE12-luc plasmid (Expressys, Ruelzheim, Germany) according to36. For that purpose, part of pZE12-luc was amplified using the primers PLlacoB and PLlacoD and treated with XbaI, resulting in two fragments of ~2.2 kb and a 1.7 kb fragment. The longer fragment containing the vector backbone, was then ligated with XbaI-restricted STnc1740 or rssR fragments amplified from the 14028 chromosome using the primers listed in Table S3, resulting in plasmids pZE-STnc1740 and pZE-rssR. To overproduce a highly active variant of SsrB termed SsrBc40 with N-terminal His6-tag, nucleotides 412–639 of ssrB were cloned into pBAD/HisA(TetR). Recombinant pXG10(sf) plasmids were constructed via SLIC76. All plasmids were verified by PCR and sequencing. Enzymes (Fermentas) used are listed in Table S2 and Table S3.
Cloning of promoter fusion to luxCDABE
To construct chromosomal reporter strains, 500 bp-fragments representing the region upstream of the start codon (promoters) or the 3′-region of a gene or operon were amplified from S. Typhimurium 14028 DNA by PCR using the primers listed in Table S3. The fragments were then cloned upstream of the promoterless luxCDABE genes into the multiple cloning site of the suicide vector pUTs-lux(CmR). After transformation into E. coli SM10 cells, plasmids were validated by PCR and sequencing. The constructs were transferred into 14028 or derivatives by conjugation, and exconjugants were selected and verified by PCR. Enzymes (Fermentas) used are listed in Table S2 and Table S3.
RNA isolation, quantitative real-Time PCR, and Northern blotting
Total RNA was isolated from S. Typhimurium 14028 and derivatives as follows: at appropriate time points, culture samples were taken and resuspended in TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). RNA was then isolated as previously described29 and treated with DNaseI (Fermentas) twice to eliminate any DNA contamination. Synthesis of cDNA and qRT-PCR were performed as previously described77. Northern blotting was performed according to Kröger and colleagues29 using the DIG Northern blot starter kit (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) following the manufacturer’s manual; the RiboRuler High Range RNA ladder (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used as a marker. The oligonucleotides used for the amplification of non-radiolabeled riboprobes are listed in Table S3.
Quantification of transcriptional activities
Bioluminescence measurements were performed according to the method by Rothhardt et al.14. For measurements in LB medium, cells were grown overnight at 37 °C and diluted 1:1,000 in LB medium. Samples of 200 µL were then analysed during incubation in a 96-well plate at 37 °C under shaking. To induce pBAD/HisA(TetR)-derived overexpression, cultures were supplemented with 1 mM arabinose. The values shown in the figures represent the maximal transcriptional activity observed during the exponential growth phase.
Purification of SsrBc
His6-SsrBc was overproduced in E. coli BL21λDE3 lacking H-NS and the H-NS-like factor StpA from pBAD-ssrBc, and purified using the Ni-NTA Fast Start Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as follows: an overnight culture of E. coli was diluted 1:100 into 400 mL LB medium and incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm. After 3 h, the expression of ssrBc was induced by adding 1 mM arabinose. Following a further incubation of 4 h, the cells were harvested, and the pellets were resuspended in 4 mL of native lysis buffer. The cells were lysed by ultrasonification (Sonopuls UW2200, Bandelin, Berlin), and the cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 4 °C (20 min, 1.6 × 104 g) and filtration via Millex-GV (Merck, Cork, Ireland). His6-SsrBc was bound to the column that was then washed and eluted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The protein concentration was determined using RotiQuant solution (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) based on the method of Bradford78. The purity of eluted fractions was analyzed by separation on a 12.5% sodium dodecyl sufate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel and Western blot according to77, revealing a ~10 kD protein.
GMSAs with purified SsrBc
Putative promoter regions of rssR, sseA, and argS as competitor DNA, were amplified (for oligonucleotides, see Table S3 or17, and 100 ng of DNA was mixed with increasing amounts of purified His6-SsrBc in 1 × Tris/borate/ ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer (TBE) with a total volume of 20 µL. After incubation for 45 min at room temperature, the samples were loaded with 4 µL of 6 × loading dye (Fermentas) on a 12% native polyacrylamide gel prepared in 1 × TBE buffer and separated at 120 V for 3 h in the same buffer. DNA was then stained in ethidium bromide solution and visualized by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation.
SPR spectroscopy
SPR spectroscopy assays were performed using a Biacore T200 device (GE Healthcare) and streptavidin-precoated Xantec SAD500-L carboxymethyl dextran sensor chips (XanTec Bioanalytics GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany). Before immobilizing the DNA fragments, the chips were equilibrated by three injections using 1 M NaCl/50 mM NaOH at a flow rate of 10 µl min−1. Then, 10 nM of the RssR oligonucleotide labelled with cyanine at its 5′-end and with biotin-TEG at is 3′-end was injected using a contact time of 420 sec and a flow rate of 10 µl min−1 to a final response of 1000–5000 RU. As a final wash step, 1 M NaCl/50 mM NaOH/50% (v/v) isopropanol was injected. Then, RNA oligonucleotides were injected over the surface for 180 s contact time following a dissociation tome of 900 s at flow rate 30 µl/min. After each cycle, bound RNA was removed from the chip by injecting 40% formamide, 3.6 M urea, and 30 mM EDTA for 120 s. All experiments were conducted at 25 °C with RNA structure buffer [100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.0; 1 M KCl; 100 mM MgCl2]. Before use, all RNA molecules were denaturated for 5 min at 100 °C and renaturated by slowly cooling down the temperature to 25 °C. Sensorgrams were recorded using the Biacore T200 Control software 2.0 and analyzed with the Biacore T200 Evaluation software 2.0. The surface of flow cell 1 was not immobilized with RNA and used to obtain blank sensorgrams for subtraction of bulk refractive index background. The referenced sensorgrams were normalized to a baseline of 0.
References
Foster, J. W. & Spector, M. P. How Salmonella survive against the odds. Annu Rev Microbiol 49, 145–174 (1995).
Fass, E. & Groisman, E. A. Control of Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 gene expression. Curr Opin Microbiol 12, 199–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.01.004 (2009).
LaRock, D. L., Chaudhary, A. & Miller, S. I. Salmonellae interactions with host processes. Nat Rev Microbiol 13, 191–205, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3420 (2015).
Galan, J. E. Salmonella interactions with host cells: type III secretion at work. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 17, 53–86, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.53 (2001).
Waterman, S. R. & Holden, D. W. Functions and effectors of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system. Cell Microbiol 5, 501–511 (2003).
Patel, J. C. & Galan, J. E. Manipulation of the host actin cytoskeleton by Salmonella-all in the name of entry. Curr Opin Microbiol 8, 10–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.09.001 (2005).
Haraga, A., Ohlson, M. B. & Miller, S. I. Salmonellae interplay with host cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 53–66, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1788 (2008).
Fuchs, T. M., Eisenreich, W., Heesemann, J. & Goebel, W. Metabolic adaptation of human pathogenic and related nonpathogenic bacteria to extra- and intracellular habitats. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36, 435–462 (2012).
Staib, L. & Fuchs, T. M. From food to cell: nutrient exploitation strategies of enteropathogens. Microbiology 160, 1020–1039 (2014).
Srikumar, S. & Fuchs, T. M. Ethanolamine utilization contributes to proliferation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in food and in nematodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 77, 281–290, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01403-10 (2011).
Abu Kwaik, Y. & Bumann, D. Microbial quest for food in vivo: ‘nutritional virulence’ as an emerging paradigm. Cell Microbiol 15, 882–890, https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12138 (2013).
Steeb, B. et al. Parallel exploitation of diverse host nutrients enhances Salmonella virulence. Plos Pathog 9, e1003301, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003301 (2013).
Thiennimitr, P. et al. Intestinal inflammation allows Salmonella to use ethanolamine to compete with the microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 17480–17485 (2011).
Rothhardt, J. E., Kröger, C., Broadley, S. P. & Fuchs, T. M. The orphan regulator ReiD of Salmonella enterica is essential for myo-inositol utilization. Mol Microbiol 94, 700–712 (2014).
Old, D. C. Temperature-dependent utilization of meso-inositol: a useful biotyping marker in the genealogy of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 112, 779–783 (1972).
Reynolds, T. B. Strategies for acquiring the phospholipid metabolite inositol in pathogenic bacteria, fungi and protozoa: making it and taking it. Microbiology 155, 1386–1396 (2009).
Kröger, C. & Fuchs, T. M. Characterization of the myo-inositol utilization island of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 191, 545–554 (2009).
Yoshida, K. et al. myo-Inositol catabolism in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 283, 10415–10424 (2008).
Lawley, T. D. et al. Genome-wide screen for Salmonella genes required for long-term systemic infection of the mouse. Plos Pathog 2, e11 (2006).
Carnell, S. C. et al. Role in virulence and protective efficacy in pigs of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium secreted components identified by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Microbiology 153, 1940–1952 (2007).
Chaudhuri, R. R. et al. Comprehensive assignment of roles for Salmonella typhimurium genes in intestinal colonization of food-producing animals. Plos Genet 9, e1003456 (2013).
Santiviago, C. A. et al. Analysis of pools of targeted Salmonella deletion mutants identifies novel genes affecting fitness during competitive infection in mice. Plos Pathog 5, e1000477, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000477 (2009).
Hellinckx, J., Heermann, R., Felsl, A. & Fuchs, T. M. High binding activity of repressor IolR avoids costs of untimely induction of myo-inositol utilization by Salmonella Typhimurium. Sci Rep 7 (2017).
Kröger, C., Srikumar, S., Ellwart, J. & Fuchs, T. M. Bistability in myo-inositol utilization by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 193, 1427–1435 (2011).
Sewell, W. A. & Young, J. A. Secretion of electrolytes by the pancreas of the anaestetized rat. J Physiol 252, 379–396 (1975).
Hogan, D. L. & Isenberg, J. I. Gastroduodenal bicarbonate production. Adv Intern Med 33, 385–408 (1988).
Hellinckx, J. & Fuchs, T. M. Hysteresis in myo-inositol utilization by Salmonella Typhimurium. Microbiol Open 6 (2017).
Rollenhagen, C. & Bumann, D. Salmonella enterica highly expressed genes are disease specific. Infect Immun 74, 1649–1660 (2006).
Kröger, C. et al. The transcriptional landscape and small RNAs of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, E1277–1286 (2012).
Kröger, C. et al. An infection-relevant transcriptomic compendium for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Cell Host Microbe 14, 683–695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.010 (2013).
Chao, Y., Papenfort, K., Reinhardt, R., Sharma, C. M. & Vogel, J. An atlas of Hfq-bound transcripts reveals 3’ UTRs as a genomic reservoir of regulatory small RNAs. EMBO J 31, 4005–4019, https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.229 (2012).
Papenfort, K. & Vogel, J. Small RNA functions in carbon metabolism and virulence of enteric pathogens. Front CellularInfect Microbiol 4, 91, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00091 (2014).
Durica-Mitic, S., Gopel, Y. & Gorke, B. Carbohydrate Utilization in Bacteria: Making the Most Out of Sugars with the Help of Small Regulatory RNAs. Microbiol Spectr 6, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0013-2017 (2018).
Chao, Y. et al. In Vivo Cleavage Map Illuminates the Central Role of RNase E in Coding and Non-coding RNA Pathways. Mol Cell 65, 39–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.002 (2017).
Figueroa-Bossi, N., Valentini, M., Malleret, L., Fiorini, F. & Bossi, L. Caught at its own game: regulatory small RNA inactivated by an inducible transcript mimicking its target. Genes Dev 23, 2004–2015, https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.541609 (2009).
Urban, J. H. & Vogel, J. Translational control and target recognition by Escherichia coli small RNAs in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 1018–1037, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1040 (2007).
Corcoran, C. P. et al. Superfolder GFP reporters validate diverse new mRNA targets of the classic porin regulator, MicF RNA. Mol Microbiol 84, 428–445, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08031.x (2012).
Tomljenovic-Berube, A. M., Mulder, D. T., Whiteside, M. D., Brinkman, F. S. & Coombes, B. K. Identification of the regulatory logic controlling Salmonella pathoadaptation by the SsrA-SsrB two-component system. Plos Genet 6, e1000875 (2010).
Reese, M. G. Application of a time-delay neural network to promoter annotation in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Comp Chem 26, 51–56 (2001).
Feng, X., Walthers, D., Oropeza, R. & Kenney, L. J. The response regulator SsrB activates transcription and binds to a region overlapping OmpR binding sites at Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Mol Microbiol 54, 823–835 (2004).
Xu, X. & Hensel, M. Systematic analysis of the SsrAB virulon of Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun 78, 49–58 (2010).
Walthers, D. et al. Salmonella enterica response regulator SsrB relieves H-NS silencing by displacing H-NS bound in polymerization mode and directly activates transcription. J Biol Chem 286, 1895–1902 (2011).
Desai, S. K. et al. The horizontally-acquired response regulator SsrB drives a Salmonella lifestyle switch by relieving biofilm silencing. eLife 5, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10747 (2016).
Vogel, J. & Luisi, B. F. Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 578–589, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2615 (2011).
Holmqvist, E. et al. Global RNA recognition patterns of post-transcriptional regulators Hfq and CsrA revealed by UV crosslinking in vivo. EMBO J 35, 991–1011, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201593360 (2016).
Colgan, A. et al. The impact of 18 ancestral and horizontally-acquired regulatory proteins upon the transcriptome and sRNA landscape of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Plos Genetics 12, e1006258 (2016).
Kröger, C., Stolz, J. & Fuchs, T. M. myo-Inositol transport by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microbiol 156, 128–138 (2010).
Gottesman, S. Micros for microbes: non-coding regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Trends Genet 21, 399–404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2005.05.008 (2005).
De Lay, N., Schu, D. J. & Gottesman, S. Bacterial small RNA-based negative regulation: Hfq and its accomplices. J Biol Chem 288, 7996–8003, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R112.441386 (2013).
Vogel, J. A rough guide to the non-coding RNA world of Salmonella. Mol Microbiol 71, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06505.x (2009).
Liu, J. M. & Camilli, A. A broadening world of bacterial small RNAs. Curr Opin Microbiol 13, 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.004 (2010).
Fröhlich, K. S. & Vogel, J. Activation of gene expression by small RNA. Curr Opin Microbiol 12, 674–682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.09.009 (2009).
Sharma, C. M. et al. Pervasive post-transcriptional control of genes involved in amino acid metabolism by the Hfq-dependent GcvB small RNA. Mol Microbiol 81, 1144–1165, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07751.x (2011).
Papenfort, K., Sun, Y., Miyakoshi, M., Vanderpool, C. K. & Vogel, J. Small RNA-mediated activation of sugar phosphatase mRNA regulates glucose homeostasis. Cell 153, 426–437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.003 (2013).
Papenfort, K., Podkaminski, D., Hinton, J. C. & Vogel, J. The ancestral SgrS RNA discriminates horizontally acquired Salmonella mRNAs through a single G-U wobble pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, E757–764, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119414109 (2012).
Balasubramanian, D. & Vanderpool, C. K. Deciphering the interplay between two independent functions of the small RNA regulator SgrS in. Salmonella. J Bacteriol 195, 4620–4630, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00586-13 (2013).
Wadler, C. S. & Vanderpool, C. K. Characterization of homologs of the small RNA SgrS reveals diversity in function. Nucleic Acids Res 37, 5477–5485, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp591 (2009).
Papenfort, K. & Vanderpool, C. K. Target activation by regulatory RNAs in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39, 362–378 (2015).
Kortmann, J. & Narberhaus, F. Bacterial RNA thermometers: molecular zippers and switches. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 255–265, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2730 (2012).
Cordero-Alba, M., Bernal-Bayard, J. & Ramos-Morales, F. SrfJ, a Salmonella type III secretion system effector regulated by PhoP, RcsB, and IolR. J Bacteriol 194, 4226–4236 (2012).
Garmendia, J., Beuzón, C. R., Ruiz-Albert, J. & Holden, D. W. The roles of SsrA-SsrB and OmpR-EnvZ in the regulation of genes encoding the Salmonella typhimurium SPI-2 type III secretion system. Microbiol 149, 2385–2396 (2003).
Worley, M. J., Ching, K. H. & Heffron, F. Salmonella SsrB activates a global regulon of horizontally acquired genes. Mol Microbiol 36, 749–761 (2000).
Cirillo, D. M., Valdivia, R. H., Monack, D. M. & Falkow, S. Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival. Mol Microbiol 30, 175–188 (1998).
Walthers, D. et al. The response regulator SsrB activates expression of diverse Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 promoters and counters silencing by the nucleoid-associated protein H-NS. Mol Microbiol 65, 477–493, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05800.x (2007).
Eriksson, S., Lucchini, S., Thompson, A., Rhen, M. & Hinton, J. C. Unravelling the biology of macrophage infection by gene expression profiling of intracellular Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol 47, 103–118 (2003).
Brown, N. F. et al. Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 is expressed prior to penetrating the intestine. Plos Pathog 1, e32, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0010032 (2005).
Osborne, S. E. & Coombes, B. K. Transcriptional priming of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island-2 precedes cellular invasion. Plos One 6, e21648, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021648 (2011).
Sittka, A. et al. Deep sequencing analysis of small noncoding RNA and mRNA targets of the global post-transcriptional regulator, Hfq. Plos Genet 4, e1000163, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000163 (2008).
Ansong, C. et al. Global systems-level analysis of Hfq and SmpB deletion mutants in Salmonella: implications for virulence and global protein translation. Plos One 4, e4809, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004809 (2009).
Sittka, A., Pfeiffer, V., Tedin, K. & Vogel, J. The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for the virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 63, 193–217, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05489.x (2007).
Kakoschke, T. et al. The RNA chaperone Hfq impacts growth, metabolism and production of virulence factors in Yersinia enterocolitica. Plos One 9, e86113, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086113 (2014).
Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y (2001).
Klumpp, J. & Fuchs, T. M. Identification of novel genes in genomic islands that contribute to Salmonella typhimurium replication in macrophages. Microbiology 153, 1207–1220 (2007).
Rehmsmeier, M., Steffen, P., Hochsmann, M. & Giegerich, R. Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes. RNA 10, 1507–1517, https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.5248604 (2004).
Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).
Li, M. Z. & Elledge, S. J. Harnessing homologous recombination in vitro to generate recombinant DNA via SLIC. Nature Meth 4, 251–256, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1010 (2007).
Starke, M., Richter, M. & Fuchs, T. M. The insecticidal toxin genes of Yersinia enterocolitica are activated by the thermolabile LTTR-like regulator TcaR2 at low temperatures. Mol Microbiol 89, 596–611 (2013).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254 (1976).
Kingsford, C. L., Ayanbule, K. & Salzberg, S. L. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8, R22, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r22 (2007).
Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 3406–3415 (2003).
Darty, K., Denise, A. & Ponty, Y. VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinform 25, 1974–1975, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp250 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Jörg Vogel for providing plasmid pStHfq-6H and the LT2 strains MA3409 and MA9816, and the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) for financial support of this study (FU375/7-1; within the priority program SPP1316: FU375/8-1; within the priority program 1617: FU375/9-1 and HE5247/5-1). SPR experiments were performed in the Bioanalytics Core Facility of the LMU Biocenter, Munich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: C.K., J.R., R.H., and T.M.F. Performed the experiments: C.K., J.R., R.H., D.B., A.F., and S.C.K. Analysed the data: J.R., C.K., R.H., D.B. and T.M.F. Wrote the manuscript: C.K., J.R., R.H., and T.M.F.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kröger, C., Rothhardt, J.E., Brokatzky, D. et al. The small RNA RssR regulates myo-inositol degradation by Salmonella enterica. Sci Rep 8, 17739 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35784-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35784-8
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.