Abstract
Here we demonstrate resonant random lasing in Rhodamine B-doped polymeric microstructures fabricated by means of femtosecond laser writing via two-photon polymerization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of random lasing action in on-chip microdevices. Their feedback mechanism relies on diffuse reflections at the structure sidewall surfaces, which is known as spatially localized feedback since the scattering centers lie over the edges of the gain medium. By exciting the structures with a pulsed laser at 532 nm, a multimode emission with randomly distributed narrow peaks was observed, in accordance with the random nature of the feedback mechanism. Interestingly, their lasing threshold was found to be on the order of tens of nanojoules, which is comparable to what had been achieved for usual microcavities, thereby demonstrating the potentiality of these devices as solid-state lasers for integrated optics applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Organic dyes have been extensively used in the development of laser systems because they stand for wavelength tunability, high lasing efficiency and both, continuous and pulsed operation with great beam quality1,2,3,4. On the other hand, dye lasers rely on complex setups that easily leads to beam misalignment, which combined with the dyes toxicity, has made them less competitive to semiconductor lasers5. A strategy to overcome these setbacks has been the use of polymers as a host matrix to dyes, creating solid-state dye lasers6,7,8,9,10. Besides its neat solid architecture, this type of lasers benefits from the low cost and processing flexibility of polymers, which broadens the range of cavity designs to be made11.
Different architectures have been realized to accomplish compact organic laser devices, such as vertical external cavity surface emitting lasers12, whispering gallery cavity lasers7,8,13 and distributed feedback Bragg lasers14,15. Taking advantage of the multiple scattering of light in disordered media has also been a way of providing positive feedback for lasing16,17. The lasers supplied by this feedback mechanism are known as random lasers (RL) and have been realized in polymeric platforms by either integrating scattering centers to the sample18 or taking advantage of irregularities that produce a random variation of the refractive index throughout the active medium19. Despite their multimode and omnidirectional operation, polymeric RLs hold great promise for applications in a variety of fields including biology sensing, encoding of information and display technology5.
Lasing action in RLs is usually achieved with a spatially distributed feedback20,21,22, where scattering elements are spread over the active medium as a whole, yet some studies have shown that positive feedback may be provided from diffuse reflection at a scattering surface23,24. This approach was first introduced in the early seventies, where one of the mirrors of a Fabry-Perot cavity of a crystal laser was replaced by a scattering surface25. Nonetheless, the RL coherent behavior, represented by the presence of randomly distributed spikes superimposed to the emission spectra, was only observed about thirty years later26. As the scattering elements are spatially separated from the active medium, this architecture has been conceptualized as relying on a spatially localized feedback mechanism23,24.
Even though this mechanism has been demonstrated in polymeric films, it has not been shown to occur in on-chip integrated microstructures. Thus, in this paper, we demonstrate low threshold lasing action in dye-doped polymeric microstructures based on diffuse reflections at the structure sidewall surface as spatially localized feedback. In the lasing architecture described here, the microstructures volume serves as an amplifying medium while the sidewall surfaces act as back-scattering reflectors and output couplers. The microstructures were produced by means of femtosecond laser writing via two-photon polymerization27,28, a technique that exploits the nonlinear nature of the two-photon absorption phenomenon to fabricate high-resolution 3D microstructures.
Results and Discussions
The dye-doped polymeric microstructures were fabricated by employing 0.1 nJ pulses from a Ti:sapphire oscillator with 40 µm/s of laser scan speed. As depicted in Fig. 1a–c, they are polygon-shaped structures featuring good structural quality and low shrinkage. They were designed in such a way that they all have the same volume, thus the triangle, cube, and hexagon exhibit edges of 76, 50, and 31 µm, respectively, whereas their height is 115 µm. By carrying out atomic force microscopy, the morphology of the microstructures sidewall surface was characterized and their average roughness was found to be 2 nm (Fig. 1d). Even though the sidewall average roughness is low, the size of the morphology features is comparable to the wavelength of the light emitted by the active medium. These irregularities in the refractive index on the surface thus act as back-scattering reflectors, providing positive feedback for random lasing. Figure 1e shows morphology profile lines from which the size of the morphology features can be better visualized. The active material is Rhodamine B (RhB), which is homogeneously distributed throughout the structures7.
(a–c) Scanning electron micrographs of Rhodamine B-doped polygon-shaped microstructures fabricated by two-photon polymerization. (d) Atomic force micrograph of the sidewall surface of a microcube. (e) The same atomic force micrograph as depicted in the item d represented in a 2D chart. Two profile lines (indicated in the chart) are shown.
Each micropolygon was pumped from above with a 100-ps pulsed laser operating at 532 nm, producing a Gaussian intensity profile over the structure top surface. As the beam spot is larger than the structures dimensions, they were entirely illuminated. Pulsed excitation prevents population transfer to the triplet lowest state, which would otherwise drop the fluorescence quantum yield of the dye2. Besides, given that the fluorescence lifetime of Rhodamine B is on the order of a few nanoseconds29, the pump carried out in the picosecond regime stands for less molecular cycles, thus extending the device lifetime.
Figure 2 shows emission spectra collected for a microcube at different pump energies. As the pump energy is increased, a set of sharp peaks at random wavelengths appears, being superimposed to the Lorentzian-shape emission curve with maximum at 620 nm and 20 nm of full width at half maximum (FWHM). Notwithstanding the broadband emission of RhB that extends from 550 to 700 nm, the peaks only show up within a narrow spectral window, indicating the onset of laser action. The multimode behavior of emission with no evident spectral periodicity is a clear signature of resonant random laser and has been observed for all the polygon-shaped structures.
Emission spectra of a Rhodamine B-doped microcube for different pump energy levels. The first curve represents the spectrum taken around lasing threshold.
The peaks are a result of successive diffuse reflections of light at the structure sidewall surfaces that re-enters the gain medium and closes feedback loops with different perimeters and Q-factors in the microstructure volume. Thus, the volume serves as an amplifying medium while the sidewall surfaces act as back-scattering reflectors and output couplers. Some examples of feedback loops that may be formed by diffuse reflections in a triangular-shaped structure are illustrated in Fig. 3a. Additionally, in a previous work7 we have shown that a hollow dye-doped microcube does not exhibit lasing when excited with the same pump energy levels employed to excite the filled polygon-shaped microstructures presented here, further confirming that the emitted light propagates in the volume.
Top view schemes of feedback loops that can be formed by (a) diffuse reflections and (b) specular reflections in a triangular-shaped microstructure. (c) Emission spectra of a Rhodamine B-doped triangle-shaped microstructure taken for the same pump energy level (165 nJ/pulse).
The fact that no spectral periodicity is observed in the emission spectra rules out the contribution of specular reflections to lasing feedback. Specular reflections would otherwise give rise to fixed feedback loops inside the structure, leading to a set of either evenly spaced and well-defined peaks in the emission spectra. For example, the only possible feedback loop formed by specular reflections in the triangular-shaped structure would be an equilateral triangle loop (Fig. 3b), though no signature of this “cavity” was observed in the structure emission spectra collected for the same pump energy (Fig. 3c).
The crosslinked polymer may act as scattering medium itself, which combined with the presence of the dye, leads to random lasing action via spatially distributed feedback. However, there was no evidence of distributed feedback due to scattering at imperfections spread over the volume of the microstructures. As can be seen in the images of the micropolygons being excited at energy levels above lasing threshold (Fig. 4), only fluorescence was observed coming out of the volume of the structures. Conversely, a strong emission was observed in the edges, indicating the presence of scattering elements in the microstructures sidewall surface. They are mostly spread along the structure perimeters due to the presence of protuberances in the corners. It is important to mention that we have followed a procedure to improve the surface quality of the microstructures top surface so as to prevent scattering coming out from it. This procedure is described in detail in the experimental section.
Top-view optical transmission images of a (a) triangle-, (b) cubic- and (c) hexagon-shaped microstructures under excitation at 165, 120 and 170 nJ/pulse, respectively. A color filter was added to the setup to block the excitation light.
The behavior of the emitted light as a function of the pump energy was obtained by integrating the emission intensity over the lasing spectrum for several pump energy levels. The obtained results are illustrated in Fig. 5. A clear lasing threshold was measured at approximately 50, 20 and 80 nJ of pulse energy for the triangle-, cubic- and hexagon-shaped structures, respectively, by fitting the emission dependence on the pump energy to a bilinear curve. Such threshold energies are comparable to which have been achieved for polymer microlasers relying on usual cavities7,8,30,31.
Integrated emission intensity as a function of pump energy for (a) triangle-, (b) cubic- and (c) hexagon-shaped microstructures (threshold energies are shown in each corresponding graph).
Conclusion
We reported on random lasing in dye-doped polymeric microstructures fabricated by means of femtosecond laser writing via two-photon polymerization. Randomly distributed irregularities in the microstructures sidewall surface act as back-scattering elements, providing positive feedback for lasing. The optically active material is Rhodamine B, which is homogeneously embedded in the polymer matrix. As the gain medium is spatially separated from the feedback elements, the pump is efficiently absorbed. This represents a great advantage over most of the random lasing devices, in which most of the pump light is scattered instead of being absorbed by the gain material.
A multimode emission with no evident spectral periodicity was obtained for free-space pulsed excitation of the structures at 532 nm. This behavior, which was systematic for all the geometries analyzed, is a clear signature of resonant random laser. The lasing threshold was found to be comparable to what have been reported for polymer microlasers, whose feedback relies on usual cavities. These results thereby show that these devices hold great potential as on-chip solid-state organic lasers.
Methods
The microstructures were fabricated using a negative-tone photoresist composed of two acrylate monomers and a photoinitiator32. The monomers tris (2-hydroxy ethyl) isocyanurate tryacrylate (SR368 – Sartomer®) and dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate (SR399 - Sartomer®) were mixed in a proportion of 10/90 wt%. As photoinitiator we chose the 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl phenyl phosphinate, an acylphosphine oxide photoinitiator commercially known as Lucirin TPO-L (in excess of 3 wt%, Irgarcure®). Rhodamine B (Sigma-Aldrich®) was first dissolved in ethanol and easily incorporated to the polymeric resin in a concentration of 10 µmol/g of resin. The solution was mixed for half an hour and left to rest by 48 hours. Once the solvent had completely evaporated, a drop of the photoresist was sandwiched between a glass substrate and a cover slip separated from each other with a 115 µm spacer. The sample was placed on a translation stage mounted on an inverted microscope. 100-fs pulses of a mode-locked Ti:sapphire oscillator (86 MHz repetition rate) operating at 780 nm were focused into the volume of the polymeric resin using a NA 0.25 objective lens. 3D microfabrication was performed by controlling both a galvanometric-mirror system and the stage that supports the sample with a computer-aided software. A detailed description of the microfabrication process can be found elsewhere33. The microstructures shown herein were fabricated layer by layer until they reach the cover slip, thus their height is limited by the spacer placed between the glass substrate and the cover slip. Besides setting the microstructures top surface notably flat, this strategy helps to reduce the top surface roughness by making it reproduce the roughness of the glass surface.
The setup assembled for measuring the emission spectra of the microstructures used as excitation source a frequency-doubled (532 nm) Q-switched/mode-locked Nd:YAG laser operating at 100 Hz of repetition rate, which delivers a sequence of 100-ps pulses modulated by the Q-switched envelope (pulse train). To set the excitation to single pulse operation, a Pockels cell and a polarizer were added to the system. The laser beam was loosely focused on the microstructure top surface, resulting in a beam waist with 100 µm of radius. Microstructure emission was acquired by positioning a multimode optical fiber in the proximity of the structure sidewall surface and connecting its other end to a spectrometer (Ocean Optics HR4000®). The substrate containing the microstructures rested on an inverted microscope coupled to a CCD camera that allows real time monitoring of the excitation process. A half-wave plate, combined with a polarizer, was used to tune the energy delivered to the structures.
The microstructures were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi TM3000®) and their surface quality was obtained by directly measuring their sidewall roughness with atomic force microscopy (Nanosurf FlexAFM®).
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study is included in this published article.
References
Schafer, F. P., Schmidt, W. & Marth, K. New dye lasers covering visible spectrum. Phys. Lett. A. 24(5), 280–281 (1967).
Schafer, F. P. Dye Lasers (Springer, 1990).
Sorokin, P. P., Lankard, J. R., Hammond, E. C. & Moruzzi, V. L. Laser-pumped Stimulated Emission from Organic Dyes: Experimental Studies and Analytical Comparisons. IBM J. Res. Dev. 11, 130–148 (1967).
Thiel, E., Zander, C. & Drexhage, K. H. Continuous wave dye-laser pumped by a HeNe laser. Opt. Commun. 60, 396–398 (1986).
Sznitko, L., Mysliwiec, J. & Miniewicz, A. The role of polymers in random lasing. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 53, 951–974 (2015).
Soffer, B. H. & Mcfarland, B. B. Continuously tunable narrow-band organic dye lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 266–267 (1967).
Tomazio, N. B., De Boni, L. & Mendonca, C. R. Low threshold Rhodamine-doped whispering gallery mode microlasers fabricated by direct laser writing. Sci. Rep. 7, 8559 (2017).
Grossmann, T. et al. Low-threshold conical microcavity dye lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 063304 (2010).
Zhan, X. P. et al. Unidirectional lasing from a spiral-shaped microcavity of dye-doped polymers. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27, 311–314 (2015).
Juodkazis, S. et al. Morphology-dependent resonant laser emission of dye-doped ellipsoidal microcavity. J. Appl. Phys. 91, 916–921 (2002).
Samuel, I. D. W. & Turnbull, G. A. Polymer lasers: recent advances. Mater. Today. 7, 28–35 (2004).
Rabbani-Haghighi, H. et al. Highly efficient, diffraction-limited laser emission from a vertical external-cavity surface-emitting organic laser. Opt. Lett. 35, 1968–1970 (2010).
Datsuyk, V. V., Juodkazis, S. & Misawa, H. Properties of a laser based on evanescent-wave amplification. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 22, 1471–1478 (2005).
Berggren, M. et al. Organic solid-state lasers with imprinted gratings on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 410–411 (1998).
Riechel, S. et al. Very compact tunable solid-state laser utilizing a thin-film organic semiconductor. Opt. Lett. 26, 593–595 (2001).
Wiersma, D. S. The physics and applications of random lasers. Nat. Phys. 4, 359–367 (2008).
Noginov, M. A. Solid-state random lasers - Chapter 10 (Springer, 2005).
Balachandran, R. M., Pacheco, D. P. & Lawandy, N. M. Laser action in polymeric gain media containing scattering particles. Appl. Opt. 35, 640–643 (1996).
Tulek, A., Polson, R. C. & Vardeny, Z. V. Naturally occurring resonators in random lasing of pi-conjugated polymer films. Nat. Phys. 6, 303–310 (2010).
De Matos, C. J. S. et al. Random fiber laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 153903 (2007).
Thareja, R. K. & Mitra, A. Random laser action in ZnO. Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 71, 181–184 (2000).
Polson, R. C. & Vardeny, Z. V. Random lasing in human tissues. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1289–1291 (2004).
Consoli, A. & Lopez, C. Decoupling gain and feedback in coherent random lasers: experiments and simulations. Sci. Rep. 5, 16848 (2015).
Consoli, A. et al. Large area resonant feedback random lasers based on dye-doped biopolymer films. Opt. Express. 23, 29954–29963 (2015).
Ambartsumyan, R. V. et al. A Laser with a nonresonant feedback. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2, 442–446 (1966).
Cao, H. et al. Ultraviolet lasing in resonators formed by scattering in semiconductor polycrystalline films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3656–3658 (1998).
Lafratta, C. N. et al. Multiphoton fabrication. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46, 6238–6258 (2007).
Maruo, S. & Fourkas, J. T. Recent progress in multiphoton microfabrication. Laser Photonics Rev. 2, 100–111 (2008).
Casey, K. G. & Quitevis, E. L. Effect of solvent polarity on nonradiative processes in xanthene dyes: Rhodamine-B in normal alcohols. J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6590–6594 (1988).
Grossmann, T. et al. Strongly confined, low-threshold laser modes in organic semiconductor microgoblets. Opt. Express. 19, 10009–10016 (2011).
Zhang, C. et al. Organic printed photonics: From microring lasers to integrated circuits. Science Advances. 1, 1–7 (2015).
Baldacchini, T. et al. Acrylic-based resin with favorable properties for three-dimensional two-photon polymerization. J. Appl. Phys. 95(11), 6072–6076 (2004).
Tomazio, N. B. et al. Femtosecond laser fabrication of high-Q whispering gallery mode microresonators via two-photon polymerization. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 55, 569–574 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), EU FP7 PIRSES-2013-612267 and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This work was proposed by C.R.M., N.B.T. and L.D.B.; N.B.T. fabricated the samples, performed the optical measurements and analyzed the results. L.F.S. and G.F.B.A. contributed to the optical measurements and the characterization of the microstructures, respectively. All authors discussed the results and substantially contributed to the manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomazio, N.B., Sciuti, L.F., de Almeida, G.F.B. et al. Solid-state random microlasers fabricated via femtosecond laser writing. Sci Rep 8, 13561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31966-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31966-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
