Article | Open

Detection of malaria sporozoites expelled during mosquito sugar feeding

  • Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 7545 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26010-6
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:

Abstract

Malaria is a severe disease of global importance transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles. The ability to rapidly detect the presence of infectious mosquitoes able to transmit malaria is of vital importance for surveillance, control and elimination efforts. Current methods principally rely on large-scale mosquito collections followed by labour-intensive salivary gland dissections or enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) methods to detect sporozoites. Using forced salivation, we demonstrate here that Anopheles mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium expel sporozoites during sugar feeding. Expelled sporozoites can be detected on two sugar-soaked substrates, cotton wool and Whatman FTA cards, and sporozoite DNA is detectable using real-time PCR. These results demonstrate a simple and rapid methodology for detecting the presence of infectious mosquitoes with sporozoites and highlight potential laboratory applications for investigating mosquito-malaria interactions. Our results indicate that FTA cards could be used as a simple, effective and economical tool in enhancing field surveillance activities for malaria.

Introduction

Malaria is a vector-borne disease caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium and transmitted by Anopheline mosquitoes. Plasmodium species affecting humans are responsible for significant mortality and morbidity in tropical countries, with an estimated 216 million cases and 445,000 deaths recorded globally in 20161. The large-scale use of interventions such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has demonstrated the benefits of significant transmission reductions2. However, the increase in insecticide resistance in mosquito populations is likely to impact the long-term efficacy of these strategies3,4. Furthermore, there remains a need to develop novel, effective tools that can be integrated into surveillance and control strategies, especially with the end goal of disease elimination.

The risk of malaria infection is partly dependent on the proportion of mosquito vectors that contain the infectious sporozoite stages of Plasmodium parasites. Sporozoites can only be found in female mosquitoes which have lived long enough for the parasites to complete their sporogonic development and migrate from oocysts on the midgut wall to the salivary glands for onward transmission. When an infectious female bites a human host and starts probing, sporozoites are injected with saliva before ingestion of blood. During feeding on a sugar source, saliva is mixed with sugar, initiating digestion which continues in the crop5.

Transmission intensity is often represented by the entomological inoculation rate (EIR), which can be mathematically determined by measurement of its component factors, including mosquito density, biting rates, and the sporozoite rate in mosquitoes. Transmission-related metrics such as EIR can be used to assess whether control interventions are having an impact on transmission intensity. However, there are no standard protocols on how to measure EIR components, methodologies used are variable and largely subjective, and a range of other factors affect EIR components potentially increasing error rates6,7.

Determining the proportion of wild Anopheles mosquitoes with sporozoites has traditionally relied on time-consuming and labour-intensive dissections and microscopical examination of salivary glands8 or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) targeting the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) in homogenates of mosquito heads and thoraces9. Pre-sorting is required for morphological identification of Anopheles vector species in these studies and determining sporozoite rates in large samples is a demanding process, especially when considering that infection rates can be low even in areas of high transmission. Detection of sporozoites using PCR-based methods has resulted in greater sensitivity, specificity and shorter processing time10. The ability to accurately detect Plasmodium parasites in Anopheles mosquitoes and assess sporozoite rates can have significant consequences on the estimations of malaria transmission intensity, and will be especially important if malaria elimination efforts intensify and malaria case incidence becomes increasingly low11,12,13. New methods will be needed to complement currently used entomological procedures for detection of infectious mosquitoes, as mosquito densities and infection rates decline and secondary vectors become increasingly important12,14.

Rodent malaria (P. berghei) and human malaria (P. falciparum) sporozoites have been successfully detected in the saliva of infected Anopheles females using immunoassays and imaging techniques15,16,17,18. These studies showed that sporozoites are expelled in saliva without uptake of mammalian blood, for example during sugar feeding. Therefore, it could be possible to exploit the sugar feeding behaviour of adult female mosquitoes to detect malaria sporozoites in the wild, minimizing the need for labour-intensive collection methods or special handling of mosquitoes and preserving them for further studies. Other mosquito-borne disease surveillance studies have developed methods for detection of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) in honey-soaked Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards in modified mosquito traps19. Mosquitoes expectorated viruses in their saliva while feeding on the FTA cards and laboratory processing using PCR was successfully undertaken to identify viruses. FTA cards preserve RNA and DNA without the need for a cold storage chain which is often problematic in most tropical field settings.

In this study, we show that malaria-infected mosquitoes expel sporozoites during sugar feeding under laboratory conditions by first undertaking forced salivation. We also demonstrate that sporozoites can be detected from sugar-soaked cotton wool (the standard sugar source substrate for maintaining mosquito colonies) and from sugar-soaked FTA cards by real-time PCR. Finally, we provide evidence that Anopheles mosquitoes feeding on FTA cards results in significant mortality providing a potential added benefit to using FTA cards for malaria sentinel site surveillance in field settings.

Results

Plasmodium berghei sporozoite qPCR detection threshold

We first undertook preliminary experiments to ensure that we could accurately detect Plasmodium sporozoites using real-time (q)PCR targeting P. berghei cytb. We dissected salivary glands from 10 P. berghei-infected Anopheles stephensi (SK strain) females at 22 days post infection (dpi) and estimated the total amount of sporozoites that would be present for genomic (g)DNA extraction by counting using a haemocytometer. Initial counts estimated the presence of 58,500 sporozoites, or 5850 per mosquito. Serial ten-fold dilutions until 1:100,000 of DNA extracted from the pooled salivary glands were used to determine the cycle threshold (Ct) value for detection. The serial dilution series of P. berghei-infected dissected salivary gland extracts resulted in an r2 value of 1.0 and slope of −3.21. To further ensure the correct target sequences were amplified, dissociation curve analysis resulted in all extracts producing a single peak of 74.71 +/− 0.08 °C. Using a combination of fluorescence and dissociation curve analysis, we identified a Ct of 34 cycles beyond which we were unable to detect P. berghei cytb. This was estimated to represent a single sporozoite based on the estimated total present for DNA extraction.

Forced salivation

Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes infected with P. berghei (n = 41) had their proboscis inserted into a 10% glucose solution at 19 days post infection (dpi) and saliva was collected for 2 hours (Fig. 1). Sporozoites were detected in all whole mosquito extracts (41/41) and 19/41 (46.34%) of saliva extracts using qPCR targeting the P. berghei cytb gene. A mean cytb Ct value for mosquitoes of 21.52 +/− 0.73 (median 19.67, interquartile range (IQR) 18.2–24.48) (Fig. 2A) confirmed that significant malaria infection levels were present in all mosquitoes, given that Ct values are inversely correlated to the amount of DNA amplified. A mean Ct value of 29.93 +/− 0.59 (median 30.11, IQR 28.46–31.92) was seen for saliva extracts that produced detectable levels of the P. berghei cytb gene target (n = 19) (Fig. 2A). Fluorescence detection from saliva extracts were within the 34 Ct cycle threshold (Fig. 2B) and dissociation curve analysis (Fig. 2C) indicated correct amplification of the target. These results using a ‘forced salivation’ method confirm previous studies showing that malaria sporozoites are expelled during sugar feeding15,16,17 and our study demonstrates the ability to use qPCR to detect significant levels of sporozoites in mosquito saliva. It was not unexpected that not all salivary extracts were positive; evidence indicates that sporozoites may not successfully reach the salivary glands in every infected mosquito20, and even heavily infected mosquitoes may not eject sporozoites during every feed21.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Collection of mosquito saliva (‘forced salivation’). An An. stephensi female mosquito with legs and wings removed and proboscis inserted into a pipette tip containing 100 μl of 10% glucose solution. Saliva was collected in this manner for two hours per mosquito.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Detection of expelled sporozoites using qPCR. (A) Box and whisker plot of qPCR Ct values for the P. berghei cytb gene in infected adult mosquitoes (blue) and the resulting saliva extracts from forced salivation (red); (B) Fluorescent profiles for detection of the cytb gene in saliva; (C) Dissociation curve analysis indicating correct target amplification.

Detection of P. falciparum sporozoites in sugar-soaked cotton wool

We then went on to determine if we could detect malaria sporozoites under more natural feeding conditions in the laboratory using human malaria (P. falciparum)-infected An. stephensi mosquitoes. Infected mosquitoes in 6 replicate groups of ~70 were provided with a sugar source (10% glucose) via cotton wool pads, which were changed every 24 hours. DNA was extracted from cotton wool pads removed at days 18, 19, 24 & 26 dpi, using a modified protocol (see methods section). qPCR analysis targeting the cox1 P. falciparum gene22 was undertaken on cotton wool pad extractions and we sub-sampled mosquitoes from each pot (n = 10) to estimate the infection prevalence after the feeding regime had finished. As shown in Fig. 3, we could detect P. falciparum sporozoites in cotton wool samples from 18, 19 & 24 dpi but not from 26 dpi. The mean infection rate of mosquitoes in the replicate groups was 56.67 +/− 7.60 with a mean Ct for P. falciparum cox1 for the infected individuals (n = 34) of 28.31 +/− 0.33. These results suggest the possibility that when sporozoite-infected mosquitoes are presented with repeated sugar feeding opportunities the sporozoite levels may decrease due to continued expulsion of saliva.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Heat map showing the relative amounts of P. falciparum malaria sporozoites in saliva. qPCR targeting the P. falciparum cox1 gene24 was used to determine the relative amounts in gDNA extracts from saliva in cotton wool collected from 6 replicate pot cages containing ~70 mosquitoes per pot. Lower Ct values (red) indicate a higher level of sporozoite DNA detected and white indicates absence of detection.

Detection of malaria sporozoites in FTA cards

As FTA cards represent the optimal substrate to preserve DNA in field settings, we compared our ability to detect P. berghei sporozoites from Whatman indicating FTA cards (Whatman International Ltd, Maidstone, Kent, UK) with the standard cotton wool setup. Mosquitoes infected with P. berghei were divided into replicate groups of 5 and 10 at 22 and 23 dpi, with excess mosquitoes (~20) maintained in a standard infection cage. Mosquitoes were presented with the opportunity to feed on either FTA cards or cotton wool (both soaked in 10% glucose solution) for a 24-hour period. DNA was extracted from FTA cards, cotton wool samples and mosquitoes in replicate groups. For the main infection cage, both an FTA card and a cotton wool pad were simultaneously provided at 22 dpi for 24 hours to determine if sporozoites could be detected from both substrates (Supplementary Figure S1A).

Plasmodium berghei cytb PCR analysis on DNA extracts from the infection cage revealed Ct values of 29.3 and 31.9 for the FTA card and cotton wool pad respectively. This demonstrates that mosquitoes can feed on and expel sporozoites onto FTA cards with a potentially greater sensitivity of detection observed when compared to cotton wool. For mosquitoes in replicate groups of 5 and 10, we detected sporozoites from both FTA cards and cotton wool at both 22 and 23 dpi (Fig. 4), further confirming that FTA cards provide a suitable substrate from which to detect malaria sporozoites. All mosquitoes used in groups of 5 and 10 were subsequently shown to be positive for P. berghei sporozoites at 24 dpi with a mean Ct value of 21.32 +/− 0.55. All our Ct values from FTA cards and cotton wool were within the threshold limit of detection (34 cycles) and had identical dissociation curves with single peaks.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Heat map showing the relative amounts of mean P. berghei malaria parasites in mosquitoes and sporozoites in saliva eluted from FTA cards and cotton wool. Sugar substrates were placed on pots of mosquito pools of 5 and 10 with two replicate pots for each pool size over two days of collection. qPCR targeting the P. berghei cytb gene was used to determine the relative amounts and lower Ct values (red) indicate a higher level of sporozoite DNA detected and white indicates absence of detection.

We repeated the experiment using 24 replicate groups containing three P. berghei-infected mosquitoes (Supplementary Figure S1C). Half of the groups were provided the opportunity to feed on FTA cards, the other half on cotton wool at 21 and 24 dpi. As shown in Table 1, at 21 dpi 36% of FTA card DNA extracts were positive for P. berghei sporozoites compared to 31% of cotton wool DNA extracts. A similar trend was observed at 24 dpi but greater detection was observed, with 58% of FTA cards and 55% of cotton wool DNA extracts having detectable levels of P. berghei sporozoites. Mean Ct values were comparable across sugar substrates and dpi suggesting FTA cards provide a more consistent substrate for both preservation of DNA and elution during the DNA extraction process.

Table 1 Plasmodium berghei cytb PCR analysis on DNA extracted from FTA cards and cotton wool from 24 replicate groups of 3 mosquitoes at 21 & 24 days post infection (dpi).

Mosquito survival

We performed mosquito survival experiments using An. stephensi (SK strain) and An. coluzzii (N’gousso strain) to compare the survival rates of mosquitoes feeding on glucose from classic and indicating FTA cards (Supplementary Figure S1B) as compared with the standard cotton wool set up, to determine the effects of continual sugar feeding on these different substrates. Survival of both species of Anopheles mosquitoes provided with glucose on both types of FTA cards was significantly reduced compared to those given glucose on cotton wool (Fig. 5). The effect was significant for both An. stephensi (Log-Rank statistic Χ2df = 2 = 82.88, p < 0.0001) and An. coluzzii (Log-Rank statistic Χ2df = 2 = 119.4, p < 0.0001) suggesting mortality from sugar feeding on FTA cards is independent of Anopheline mosquito species. Furthermore, the greatest mortality occurs within the first few days of feeding on both classic and indicating FTA cards and by day 5 less than 10% of mosquitoes were alive compared to over 80% for those feeding on cotton wool. These results suggest a strong lethal effect of feeding on FTA cards on Anopheline mosquitoes, which could have a secondary benefit of being a toxic sugar source in field settings.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for three groups of mosquitoes provided with glucose on cotton wool, classic FTA cards or indicating FTA cards. The survival distributions were significantly different for both mosquito species. (A) An. stephensi (Log-Rank statistic Χ2df = 2 = 82.88, p < 0.0001). (B) An. coluzzii (Log-Rank statistic Χ2df = 2 = 119.4, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

In this study, we have demonstrated that Anopheline mosquitoes expel malaria sporozoites while feeding on sugar sources under laboratory settings. Using qPCR techniques, we were able to detect the sporozoites of both P. falciparum and P. berghei from small groups of sugar-feeding mosquitoes from cotton wool and, with greater sensitivity, from Whatman FTA cards. Collectively, this demonstrates the potential of these methods to enhance investigations into mosquito-malaria interactions and malaria transmission in both the laboratory and field.

The ability to simply and rapidly detect sporozoites from a sugar-feeding substrate without sacrificing individual mosquitoes allows for a range of beneficial experimental applications. These include reduced cost and expert time, precluding the need for extensive training or laboratory equipment as is required for salivary gland dissections or ELISA-based approaches. Furthermore, the approach of using cotton wool which has no significant effects on mosquito mortality allows for more detailed investigations into the development of sporozoites within individual mosquitoes under variable laboratory conditions (e.g. ambient temperature or relative humidity). Such experiments are key to our understanding of the impact of environmental conditions on malaria transmission dynamics, yet the need to kill and dissect a mosquito to detect sporozoites has meant that assessing the progression of sporogony within an individual mosquito has not been possible, even with other rapid real-time PCR assays23. Furthermore, it is often thought that once a mosquito becomes infectious, it remains infectious (that is, it continues to expel sporozoites) for the rest of its life, which often does not extend much longer than the duration of sporogony. Here, we were able to detect P. falciparum sporozoites in cotton wool samples from 18 to 24 dpi but not from 26 dpi. This could therefore support previous observations showing that mosquitoes do not necessarily remain infectious for life and that the number of sporozoites in salivary glands can be depleted by repeated feeding24, due to physiological changes in salivary glands15 or can degenerate due to factors such as time and temperature25,26. However, further experiments involving sporozoite counts over time following sugar feeding would be required to draw definitive conclusions regarding this effect. Interestingly, another independent study recently published after completion of our experimental work also provides evidence that malaria sporozoites can be expelled on honey-coated FTA cards after only 12 days post infection using Taqman PCR analysis targeting the 18 S rRNA gene27.

The detection of malaria sporozoites on sugar-soaked FTA cards indicates the potential to use this methodology in malaria-endemic field settings. Firstly, FTA cards preserve both RNA and DNA without the need for a cold storage chain. FTA cards have been successfully used for detection of malaria gametocytes at sub-microscopic levels after the cards were first stored under hot and humid tropical conditions such as those encountered during sampling, followed by a storage period in variable conditions such as those during transportation28. When biological material comes into contact with the FTA card matrix, cells are lysed and nucleic acids are immobilised and stabilised within the matrix. This preserves both pathogen and mosquito DNA for either immediate processing or long-term storage, with no loss to PCR efficiency even when stored at room temperature29. To obtain DNA, FTA cards can be washed, leaving clean DNA to be extracted, and our optimised protocols for eluting DNA provide an ideal chain to move from field settings to PCR detection of malaria sporozoites in the laboratory.

Secondly, FTA cards inactivate pathogens such as malaria and arboviruses upon contact and prevent the growth of bacteria and other hazardous and contaminating microorganisms. Manuka honey can also be used as the sugar source to provide additional anti-bacterial protection19,30. This would facilitate the use of the cards for extended periods of time at high temperatures in tropical areas where malaria transmission occurs, whilst maximising safety during collection, transport and storage. The cards can be sent through regular shipping methods without the need for hazardous labelling, therefore providing an economical option of sample collection for malaria-endemic countries.

Thirdly, the application of this novel method of malaria transmission surveillance is particularly important when there is growing evidence that secondary Anopheline species are playing an important role in transmission31. In the field, live Anopheles mosquitoes are collected using several different methods such as human landing catches (HLC), exit trap collections, and CDC light traps32. Variations in the collection efficacy of each method and the time periods used can result in non-representative and poorly comparable samples and therefore skewed estimates of malaria transmission intensity. Following collection, large mosquito samples need to be sorted, identified and pooled prior to analysis, and only a fraction of these, often from presumed primary vectors, may be tested to estimate the prevalence of malaria in the mosquito population. This hurdle has similarly been seen in arbovirus surveillance, with an Australian study estimating that more than 47,000 mosquitoes would need to be collected and processed to obtain a single pool positive for Japanese Encephalitis virus33. FTA cards can simply be added to existing artificial traps with little or no modification to the design of the trap34. This would negate the need for extensive pre-sorting of samples and ensure malaria detection from any primary or secondary species that feeds on the card within the trap. Alternatively, trap-free bait stations containing FTA cards, similar to those set up for arbovirus surveillance35,36, could be set up in the field to allow mosquito feeding and subsequent detection of malaria. These FTA card approaches benefit from simplicity and preclude the need for extensive training of personnel; they therefore provide a simple, safe and cost-effective addition that could enhance existing surveillance regimes used by vector control programmes in remote areas. This may be particularly useful in elimination settings to detect the presence of sporozoites without extensive sampling and analysis of the mosquito population.

Finally, as FTA cards have already been used for detection of viruses in field settings19,29,34,36,37,38,39,40, sentinel-site surveillance for additional insect-borne pathogens could also theoretically be undertaken using FTA cards. Xenomonitoring of lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis (reviewed by Pilotte et al.41) has had limited programmatic application principally due to the difficulties in collecting mosquitoes and the costs of the molecular processing of large numbers of collected mosquitoes to determine parasite prevalence rates, which are often very low in field populations. For lymphatic filariasis, multiple mosquito genera play a role in transmission, so FTA cards could provide a simple tool to provide evidence of transmission without the need to screen large samples. FTA cards could also be used to detect pathogens with a postulated or confirmed mechanical mode of transmission from mosquitoes, such as Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica42,43, or from other fly species including the house fly, Musca domestica (e.g. Chlamydia trachomatis or Shigella spp.)44,45,46,47.

Methods

Infection of mosquitoes with Plasmodium

Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes (SDA500 strain48) were infected with P. berghei (ANKA clone 50749) at Imperial College London (ICL) and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) or Plasmodium falciparum (NF54) (ICL) as described below.

Mosquitoes were infected with P. berghei by feeding on anaesthetised mice as described previously50,51. Briefly, P. berghei strain ANKA 507 was maintained in 4–10 week old female Tuck CD1 mice (Charles River) by serial blood passage (up to a maximum of eight passages). Hyper-reticulocytosis was induced 2–3 days before infection by treating mice with 200 µl intraperitoneal (i.p.) phenylhydrazine chloride (PHz; 6 mg.ml−1 in PBS; ProLabo, UK). Stock mice were infected by i.p. injection of blood containing parasites, and infections were monitored on Giemsa-stained tail blood smears. To generate infected mosquitoes, groups of five 4–10-week-old female PHz-treated CD1 mice were infected with P. berghei ANKA 2.34 by syringe inoculation (i.p.), followed by feeding to mosquitoes at days 3–4 post-infection. On days 3–4, five infected mice were anaesthetized and exposed to cages containing 500 starved female An. stephensi mosquitoes. Unfed mosquitoes were removed and fed ones were maintained on 8–10% (w/v) fructose, 0.05% (w/v) p-aminobenzoic acid and maintained at 19–20 °C and 80% relative humidity until required.

For P. falciparum infections, erythrocytic stages of the NF54 isolate were cultured as described previously52 followed by induction of gametocytogenesis52. Ten to 18-day old cultures demonstrating exflagellation of male gametocytes were then added to fresh human red blood cells (group A, National Blood Service, UK) with heat-inactivated human AB serum (National Blood Service, UK) at a packed cell volume of 40% and introduced into plastic membrane feeders. To generate infected mosquitoes, An. stephensi were allowed to feed on the membrane feeders for 25–30 min, and then maintained at 26 °C and 80% relative humidity until required.


Collection of saliva from mosquitoes (‘forced salivation’)

Plasmodium berghei-infected female An. stephensi mosquitoes at 19 dpi were anesthetised using carbon dioxide and wings and legs were removed. The proboscis of each female was inserted into a pipette tip containing 100 μl of 10% glucose solution and was left to salivate for 2 hours (Fig. 1). Care was taken to check that the proboscis was continually in the glucose solution for the duration of the collection period.


DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from individual whole mosquitoes using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Modifications to this extraction protocol were made to extract genomic DNA from saliva, cotton wool samples and classic (white) and indicating (pink to white colour change upon sample addition) Whatman FTA cards. 100 µL of the 10% glucose solution containing saliva was added to 80 µL of ATL buffer to obtain the correct volume for the addition of 20 µL proteinase K. For cotton wool and FTA card sections, a working solution of 180 µL ATL buffer + 20 µL proteinase K + 200 μL AL buffer (total 400 µl) was added to these samples in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and vortexed for 20 sec. Samples were incubated for 3 hours at 56 °C with vortexing every 1 hour. The remaining steps of the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit extraction protocol resulted in DNA eluted in 100 μL of AE buffer and stored at −20 °C prior to PCR analysis.


Detection of P. berghei

Detection of P. berghei was undertaken using a real-time PCR targeting a 94-bp sequence of the P. berghei cytochrome b (cytb) mitochondrial gene (Accession No. DQ414645)53. The primers used for PCR were 5′-TGGGGACAAATGAGTTACTGG-3′ and 5′-CAGTGTATCCTCCACATAACCAA-3′. PCR reactions were prepared using a Quantinova SYBR green mix (Qiagen) as preliminary trials revealed this provided the most sensitive but specific detection method. Each reaction contained 5 µL of master mix, a final concentration of 1 µM of each primer, 1 µL of PCR grade water and 2 µL template DNA in a final reaction volume of 10 µL. Prepared reactions were run on a LightCycler® 96 System (Roche Diagnostics, West Sussex, UK) for 15 mins at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Amplification was followed by a dissociation curve (95 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 60 s and 97 °C for 1 s) to ensure the correct target sequence was being amplified. PCR results were analysed using LightCycler® 96 software (Roche Diagnostics).

In order to determine the assay’s limit of detection, we dissected the salivary glands from 10 P. berghei-infected mosquitoes and estimated the total number of sporozoites present for detection of DNA by counting using a haemocytometer. Pooled salivary glands were sequentially ten-fold diluted until 1:100,000 and the assay run with each dilution to determine the Ct threshold limit of detection.


Detection of P. falciparum

Detection of P. falciparum was undertaken using a real-time PCR targeting a 120-bp sequence of the P. falciparum cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) mitochondrial gene22,54. Primers used for the PCR were 5′-TTACATCAGGAATGTTATTGC-3′ and 5′-ATATTGGATCTCCTGCAAAT-3′. This assay was selected due to sensitivity and specificity to detect mitochondria of all stages of P. falciparum. In addition, PCR reactions were prepared using FastStart SYBR Green Master mix (Roche Diagnostics) as preliminary trials revealed this provided the most sensitive but specific mastermix. Each reaction contained 5 µL of master mix, a final concentration of 1 µM of each primer, 1 µL of PCR grade water and 2 µL template DNA, to a final reaction volume of 10 µL. Prepared reactions were run on the LightCycler® 96 System (Roche Diagnostics) for 15 mins at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 58 °C for 30 s. Amplification was followed by a dissociation curve (95 °C for 10 s, 65 °C for 60 s and 97 °C for 1 s) to ensure the correct target sequence was being amplified. Positive controls from genomic DNA extracted from a cultured P. falciparum-infected blood (parasitaemia of ~10%) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard for P. falciparum DNA55 were included on each run in addition to no template controls (NTCs). PCR results were analysed using the LightCycler® 96 software (Roche Diagnostics).


Mosquito survival

Newly emerged An. stephensi (SK strain) and An. coluzzii (N’gousso strain56) mosquitoes were provided with 10% glucose and 0.05% para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) mixture ad libitum on classic and indicating FTA cards and on cotton wool, and were kept at 26 °C and 70% relative humidity. Survival was monitored on a daily basis to determine the effects of continual sugar feeding on FTA cards.


Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 7 was used to generate Box and whisker plots, Heat maps and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.


Ethics

Animal work was conducted under UK Home Office license and approval in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 implementing European Directive 2010/63 for the protection of animals used for experimental purposes. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and approval was obtained from the LSHTM Animal Welfare Ethics Review Board and the ICL Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body, with animal welfare assessed daily.


Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2017 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Bhatt, S. et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 526, 207–211 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Ranson, H. & Lissenden, N. Insecticide resistance in African Anopheles mosquitoes: A worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends in Parasitology 32, 187–196 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Hemingway, J. et al. Tools and strategies for malaria control and elimination: What do we need to achieve a grand convergence in malaria? PLoS Biol. 14 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Rodriguez, M. H. & Hernández-Hernández, F. D. L. C. Insect-malaria parasites interactions: The salivary gland. In. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 34, 615–624 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Shaukat, A. M., Breman, J. G. & Ellis McKenzie, F. Using the entomological inoculation rate to assess the impact of vector control on malaria parasite transmission and elimination. Malar. J. 9 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Kelly-Hope, L. A. & McKenzie, F. E. The multiplicity of malaria transmission: A review of entomological inoculation rate measurements and methods across sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria Journal 8 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Beier, J. C. et al. Quantitation of malaria sporozoites in the salivary glands of wild Afrotropical Anopheles. Med. Vet. Entomol. 5, 63–70 (1991).

  9. 9.

    Wirtz, R. A. et al. ELISA method for detecting Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite antibody. Bull World Heal. Organ 67, 535–542 (1989).

  10. 10.

    Chaumeau, V. et al. Comparison of the performances of five primer sets for the detection and quantification of Plasmodium in Anopheline vectors by real-time PCR. PLoS One 11, e0159160 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Snounou, G. et al. The importance of sensitive detection of malaria parasites in the human and insect hosts in epidemiological studies, as shown by the analysis of field samples from Guinea Bissau. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87, 649–653 (1993).

  12. 12.

    James, S., Takken, W., Collins, F. H. & Gottlieb, M. Needs for monitoring mosquito transmission of malaria in a pre-elimination world. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90, 6–10 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Tusting, L. S., Bousema, T., Smith, D. L. & Drakeley, C. Measuring changes in Plasmodium falciparum transmission. Precision, accuracy and costs of metrics. Adv. Parasitol. 84, 151–208 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Afrane, Y. A., Bonizzoni, M. & Guiyun, Y. In Current Topics in Malaria (ed. Rodriguez-Morales, A. J.) (InTech, 2016). https://doi.org/10.5772/65359.

  15. 15.

    Golenda, C. F., Burge, R. & Schneider, I. Plasmodium falciparum and P. berghei: detection of sporozoites and the circumsporozoite proteins in the saliva of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. Parasitol. Res. 78, 563–569 (1992).

  16. 16.

    Frischknecht, F. et al. Imaging movement of malaria parasites during transmission by Anopheles mosquitoes. Cell. Microbiol. 6, 687–694 (2004).

  17. 17.

    Beier, J. C. & Koros, J. K. Anatomical dissemination of circumsporozoite protein in wild Afrotropical Anopheles affects malaria sporozoite rate determination by ELISA. Med. Vet. Entomol. 5, 81–85 (1991).

  18. 18.

    Billingsley, P. F., Hodivala, K. J., Winger, L. A. & Sinden, R. E. Detection of mature malaria infections in live mosquitoes. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85, 450–453 (1991).

  19. 19.

    Hall-Mendelin, S. et al. Exploiting mosquito sugar feeding to detect mosquito-borne pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 11255–11259 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Hillyer, J. F., Barreau, C. & Vernick, K. D. Efficiency of salivary gland invasion by malaria sporozoites is controlled by rapid sporozoite destruction in the mosquito haemocoel. Int. J. Parasitol. 37, 673–681 (2007).

  21. 21.

    Medica, D. L. & Sinnis, P. Quantitative dynamics of Plasmodium yoelii sporozoite transmission by infected anopheline mosquitoes. Infect. Immun. 73, 4363–4369 (2005).

  22. 22.

    Marie, A. et al. Evaluation of a real-time quantitative PCR to measure the wild Plasmodium falciparum infectivity rate in salivary glands of Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 12 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Kefi, M. et al. New rapid one-step PCR diagnostic assay for Plasmodium falciparum infective mosquitoes. Sci. Rep. 8, 1462 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Macdonald, G. The analysis of the sporozoite rate. Trop. Dis. Bull. 49, 569–586 (1952).

  25. 25.

    Barber, M. A. Degeneration of sporozoites of the malaria parasite in Anopheline mosquitoes in nature and its relation to the transmission of malaria. Am. J. Hyg. 24, 45–56 (1936).

  26. 26.

    Boyd, M. F. Malariology. A comprehensive Survey of all Aspects of this Group of Diseases from a global Standpoint. 2, (W. B. Saunders Co. 1949).

  27. 27.

    Melanson, V. R. et al. Improving vector-borne pathogen surveillance: A laboratory-based study exploring the potential to detect dengue virus and malaria parasites in mosquito saliva. J. Vector Borne Dis. 54, 301–310 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Jones, S. et al. Filter paper collection of Plasmodium falciparum mRNA for detecting low-density gametocytes. Malar. J. 11, 266 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Hall-Mendelin, S. et al. FTA cards facilitate storage, shipment, and detection of arboviruses in infected Aedes aegypti collected in adult mosquito traps. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96, 1241–1243 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Lusby, P. E., Coombes, A. L. & Wilkinson, J. M. Bactericidal activity of different honeys against pathogenic bacteria. Arch. Med. Res. 36, 464–467 (2005).

  31. 31.

    Kyalo, D. et al. A geo-coded inventory of anophelines in the Afrotropical Region south of the Sahara: 1898–2016. Wellcome Open Res. 2, 57 (2017).

  32. 32.

    World Health Organization. Manual on practical entomology in malaria. Part II. Methods and techniques. Manual on practical entomology in malaria. Part II. Methods and techniques. https://doi.org/10.1038/148423c0 (1975).

  33. 33.

    Ritchie, S. A. et al. Operational trials of remote mosquito trap systems for Japanese Encephalitis Virus surveillance in the Torres Strait, Australia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 7, 497–506 (2007).

  34. 34.

    Flies, E. J., Toi, C., Weinstein, P., Doggett, S. L. & Williams, C. R. Converting mosquito surveillance to arbovirus surveillance with honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 15, 397–403 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Lothrop, H. D., Wheeler, S. S., Fang, Y. & Reisen, W. K. Use of scented sugar bait stations to track mosquito-borne arbovirus transmission in California. J. Med. Entomol. 49, 1466–1472 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Girod, R. et al. Detection of Chikungunya virus circulation using sugar-baited traps during a major outbreak in French Guiana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004876 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Kaufmann, C., Mathis, A. & Vorburger, C. Sugar-feeding behaviour and longevity of European Culicoides biting midges. Med. Vet. Entomol. 29, 17–25 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Madhanmohan, M. et al. Evaluation of the Flinders Technology Associates Cards for storage and temperature challenges in field conditions for Foot-and-Mouth Disease virus surveillance. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 63, 675–680 (2016).

  39. 39.

    van den Hurk, A. F. et al. Applications of a sugar-based surveillance system to track arboviruses in wild mosquito populations. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 14, 66–73 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Johnson, B. J. et al. Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK). Parasites and Vectors 8, 509 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Pilotte, N., Unnasch, T. R. & Williams, S. A. The current status of molecular xenomonitoring for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. Trends in Parasitology 33, 788–798 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Bäckman, S., Näslund, J., Forsman, M. & Thelaus, J. Transmission of tularemia from a water source by transstadial maintenance in a mosquito vector. Sci. Rep. 5, 7793 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Thelaus, J. et al. Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica occurs in Swedish mosquitoes, persists through the developmental stages of laboratory-infected mosquitoes and is transmissible during blood feeding. Microb. Ecol. 67, 96–107 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Chaiwong, T. et al. The blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala, and the house fly, Musca domestica, as mechanical vectors of pathogenic bacteria in Northeast Thailand. Trop. Biomed. 31, 336–346 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Pohlenz, T. D., Zavadilova, K., Ghosh, A. & Zurek, L. Prevalence of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in an urban environment. J. Med. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjx225 (2017).

  46. 46.

    Levine, O. S. & Levine, M. M. Houseflies (Musca domestica) as mechanical vectors of shigellosis. Rev. Infect. Dis. 13, 688–696 (1991).

  47. 47.

    Emerson, P. M., Bailey, R. L., Mahdi, O. S., Walraven, G. E. L. & Lindsay, S. W. Transmission ecology of the fly Musca sorbens, a putative vector of trachoma. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 94, 28–32 (2000).

  48. 48.

    Feldmann, A. M. & Ponnudurai, T. Selection of Anopheles stephensi for refractoriness and susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum. Med. Vet. Entomol. 3, 41–52 (1989).

  49. 49.

    Janse, C. J. et al. High efficiency transfection of Plasmodium berghei facilitates novel selection procedures. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 145, 60–70 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Sinden, R. E. In The Molecular Biology of Insect Disease Vectors (eds Crampton, J. E., Beard, C. B. & Louis, C.) 67–91 (Springer Netherlands, 1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1535-0_7

  51. 51.

    Dessens, J. T. et al. CTRP is essential for mosquito infection by malaria ookinetes. EMBO J. 18, 6221–6227 (1999).

  52. 52.

    Fivelman, Q. L. et al. Improved synchronous production of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes in vitro. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 154, 119–123 (2007).

  53. 53.

    Shimizu, S., Osada, Y., Kanazawa, T., Tanaka, Y. & Arai, M. Suppressive effect of azithromycin on Plasmodium berghei mosquito stage development and apicoplast replication. Malar. J. 9, (2010).

  54. 54.

    Boissière, A. et al. Application of a qPCR Assay in the investigation of susceptibility to malaria infection of the M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. in Cameroon. PLoS One 8, e54820 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Padley, D. J., Heath, A. B., Sutherland, C., Chiodini, P. L. & Baylis, S. A. Establishment of the 1st World Health Organization International Standard for Plasmodium falciparum DNA for nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT)-based assays. Malar. J. 7, 139 (2008).

  56. 56.

    Habtewold, T., Duchateau, L. & Christophides, G. K. Flow cytometry analysis of the microbiota associated with the midguts of vector mosquitoes. Parasit. Vectors 9, 167 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by a Royal Society challenge grant (CHG\R1\170036) and Wellcome Trust /Royal Society grant awarded to TW (101285/Z/13/Z), http://www.wellcome.ac.uk; https://royalsociety.org. V.A.B. was additionally supported via the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grant BB/J008869/1 and M.P.G. received funding from NC3Rs, grant NC/L000601/1. J.T.D. received funding from BBSRC grant BB/M001598/1. We gratefully acknowledge Mark Tunnicliff for mosquito production. A.M.B. thanks the MRC (New Investigator Research Grant; award number MR/N00227X/1) for funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. V. A. Brugman and M. Kristan contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    • V. A. Brugman
    • , M. Kristan
    •  & T. Walker
  2. Evolution Biotechnologies, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedford, MK44 1LZ, UK

    • V. A. Brugman
  3. Department of Immunology and Infection, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    • M. P. Gibbins
  4. Department of Life Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, Imperial College Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    • F. Angrisano
    • , K. A. Sala
    •  & A. M. Blagborough
  5. Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    • J. T. Dessens

Authors

  1. Search for V. A. Brugman in:

  2. Search for M. Kristan in:

  3. Search for M. P. Gibbins in:

  4. Search for F. Angrisano in:

  5. Search for K. A. Sala in:

  6. Search for J. T. Dessens in:

  7. Search for A. M. Blagborough in:

  8. Search for T. Walker in:

Contributions

V.A.B., M.K. and T.W. conceived the research, conducted the experiments, and prepared the manuscript. J.T.D. and M.P.G. conducted P. berghei infections of mosquitoes. A.M.B., F.A. and K.A.S. provided P. berghei and P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Brugman.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.