Abstract
Micro-structural characteristics and electrical properties of an n-type GaN epilayer on Al2O3 irradiated by 290-MeV 238U32+ ions to various fluences were investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD), and Raman scattering spectroscopy. AFM images show that the nano-hillocks generated, and the diameter and density of the nano-hillocks, increase obviously with increasing ion fluence, accompanied by an increase in surface roughness. SEM images display that the Al, O, and C elements appear on the GaN surface, along with a spiral-like, layered volcanic-cone structure formed at the highest-fluence irradiation. HRXRD reveals that the dislocation density increases, as the lattices gradually expand, and that Ga2O3 was produced with increasing ion fluence. Raman scattering spectra show that no N and Ga vacancies were produced, the free-carrier concentration decreases, while its mobility first increases and then exhibits a significant reduction with increasing ion fluence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gallium nitride (GaN) is one of the most promising III-V semiconductors for optoelectronic device applications compared with GaAs and InP due to its wide direct energy band gap (3.39 eV at room temperature) and its excellent electrical, optical, thermal, and radiation-tolerant properties1,2. GaN-based materials also have a great potential for use in high-temperature, high-power, and high-frequency electronic devices, such as high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs), heterojunction field-effect transistors (HFETs), and heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs)3,4,5,6,7.
With the development of space technology and the nuclear industry, these devices are widely used for working in the aerospace, aviation, and reactor fields. Such devices inevitably suffer from both particles and electromagnetic radiation, such as protons, electrons, alpha particles, neutrons, gamma rays, and swift heavy ions (SHIs). The passage of SHIs in materials mainly produces either intensive excitation or ionization of target electrons due to energy deposition from the SHIs. A long cylindrical high-temperature, high-pressure region containing charged ions is transiently produced along the ions’ trajectory. A rapid energy transfer results in various effects in materials, such as defect creation, defect annealing, amorphization and recrystallization8. When SHIs pass through the GaN-based electronic devices, the damage not only induces micro-structural change, but also leads to a change in electrical properties.
There have been extensive studies on GaN irradiated by various SHIs9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Kucheyev et al.9 reported the formation of continuous nano-tracks in GaN by 200-MeV Au-ion irradiation. Kumar et al.10,11 reported the formation of Ga2O3 and smoothness on the GaN surface irradiated with MeV heavy ions of O, Au, and Ag. Karlušić et al.12 reported the simultaneous formation of nano-hillocks and nano-holes on the GaN surface with 92-MeV Xe-ion irradiation, whereas only nano-holes appear with 23-MeV I-ion irradiation. Mansouri et al.13 reported the formation of circular regions in GaN with 132-MeV Pb-ion irradiation. Zhang et al.14 reported that rapid damage accumulation and efficient erosion occur in GaN at a rather low value of electronic energy deposition by using 230-MeV Pb ions. Kumar et al.15 reported that 200-MeV Ag ions cause an increase in resistivity and a degradation in carrier mobility of GaN/Al2O3 film. Sonia et al.16 reported that MeV protons, C, O, Fe, and Kr ions induce a degradation in carrier mobility of AlGaN/GaN HFET devices with increasing ion fluence. Titov et al.17 reported that MeV O, Li, and Si ions lead to a decrease in the free-carrier concentration of GaN and InGaP materials. As the application of GaN-based devices in the space and reactor fields continues to grow and their size has been ceaselessly minimized, more information regarding defects responsible for degradation is needed, so that device design improvements can be made to maximize system performance. Moreover, it is difficult for electrical characterization of damaged GaN material to be measured via Ohmic contacts due to the wide band gap and to the surface damage18. Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique for studying the local transport properties in polar semiconductors over very small volumes19.
In this work, we choose the 290-MeV 238U32+ ion, the heaviest ion found in nature, which possesses the highest electron energy loss in GaN materials, compared with other mentioned ions above (Au, Ag, Pb and Xe ions)9,10,11,12,13,14,15, to systematically investigate the surface morphology and composition, dislocation density, free-carrier concentration as well as the mobility changes of GaN/Al2O3 film by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD), and Raman scattering spectroscopy. Moreover, all the mechanisms underlying aforementioned changes are discussed.
Experiment
An n-type wurtzite GaN layer is about 3 μm in thickness grown by MOCVD on c-plane sapphire substrates (supplied by Cree Inc., USA). Specimens with size of 10 × 10 mm2 were used for 238U32+ ion irradiation. The irradiation experiment was performed at a terminal chamber of the Sector Focused Cyclotron (SFC) in the National Laboratory of Heavy Ion Research Facilities in Lanzhou (HIRFL) at room temperature (RT). Vacuum pressure of the terminal chamber was 10−7 mbar. The kinetic energy of the 238U32+ ion was 290 MeV, and the fluence of the 238U32+ ion ranged from 1.0 × 109 to 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2. The flux of the ion beam was maintained as low as 5.0 × 108 ions/cm2/s and the corresponding beam intensity was 3 nA in the irradiation experiment. SRIM 2006 code was used to calculate the depth distribution and energy deposition of the incident ions. For 290-MeV 238U32+ ion in GaN/Al2O3, the electron energy loss (Se), nuclear energy loss (Sn) and the projected range were calculated as 40.88 keV/nm, 3.44 × 10−1 keV/nm, and ~13.7 μm, respectively. Hence, the 238U32+ ion loses its energy predominantly in the electronic stopping power regime throughout the entire ~3 μm-thick GaN film, and the ion end of range region is deep inside the sapphire substrate (~13.5 μm), as shown in Fig. 1.
After 238U32+ ion irradiation, the pristine and irradiated GaN samples were analyzed using tapping-mode AFM, SEM, HRXRD, and Raman scattering spectroscopy. The AFM used in this study is a model Veeco Dimension 3100, with a maximal operation voltage of 10 V and a scan frequency of 1.0 Hz. The model of the needle tip is HA-NC. The scan range is 40 μm × 40 μm and the scan scope along the z-axis is 100 nm. The SEM is a model of Nano-SEM 450 equipped with a field-emission gun with a maximal acceleration voltage of 35 kV. Electron image scanning and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) line scanning with an electron energy of 10 keV were carried out at a high-vacuum mode. The HRXRD measurements were performed using a D8 Discover X-ray diffractometer equipped with a four-crystal monochromator in Ge (220) configuration and one or two 200-μm slits before the detector. Monochromatic Cu Kα1 X-rays (λ = 0.15406 nm) are used as the incident light. The ω-2θ and ω scans on the GaN (0002) crystal planes were done on all samples. Raman spectrum measurements were carried out using a JY-HR 800 micro-Raman system with a confocal microscopy system. The spectra were obtained at room temperature with the 632.8-nm excitation of a He-Ne laser in a backscattering geometry where the scattered light propagates in a direction parallel to the c axis of the GaN epilayer. The laser beam focused on the sample surface was about 2 μm in diameter. To avoid laser heating and local annealing effects, the He-Ne laser power was kept below 2 mW. The spectral resolution was 0.65 cm−1.
Results and Discussion
Surface morphology and composition analysis
Figure 2 shows typical 40 × 40 μm2 two-dimensional (2D) AFM images of the GaN samples irradiated with 290-MeV U32+ ions. Images a, b, and c show the surface morphologies of 1.0 × 1010, 1.0 × 1011 and 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2 irradiation, respectively. After U32+ ions irradiation, nano-hillock-like defects grow out from a representative dislocation-mediated surface, which is made up of an array of terraces separated by about 2–3 nm high steps. With increasing ion fluence, the density, diameter and height of the nano-hillock-like defects obviously increase, as shown in Figs 2 and 3. The slope of the dashed lines approximately highlights the growth rate of the hillock height and diameter, based on linear fittings (Fig. 3). The average growth rate of the height and diameter is about (15.36 ± 0.93) nm/logΦ and (0.17 ± 0.03) µm/logΦ, respectively, (Φ is ion fluence) (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, the surface roughness also evidently increases with increasing ion fluence and the root-mean square (RMS) roughness of the irradiated sample is 9.3 nm (1.0 × 1010), 14 nm (1.0 × 1011) and 36.1 nm (1.0 × 1012), respectively. Furthermore, at the highest fluence (1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2) irradiation, the irradiated GaN surface is covered with a large number of nano-hillocks, cracks, and exfoliations that also appear, as well as the original surface morphology of GaN film vanishes. Similar experimental phenomena were also observed by Kumar et al.11.
According to the thermal spike model, the energy is first deposited by projectile ions in the electronic subsystem of the target. This energy is shared among the electrons by electron-electron coupling, and is subsequently transferred to the lattice atoms via electron-lattice interactions, leading to a rapid increase in the temperature and pronounced lattice heating along and in the vicinity of the ion path. The formation of surface hillocks can be ascribed to a melting process20. Moreover, a cylindrical zone of the order of several nanometers in diameter will form along the ions’ path, with high atomic mobility and reduced density. Therefore, this irradiated region may be strikingly different from the pristine. This effect of the high temperature and high pressure on the surrounding material, and also on the direct modification of the material in the track itself, can create new potential gradients, which act as a driving force for further modification and create nanostructures during ion irradiation21. In order to further detect the compositions and the microstructure of the hillocks on irradiated GaN surfaces, we analyze the hillocks in detail using SEM.
Figure 4 shows the compositions and microstructure of hillocks on irradiated GaN surfaces at different fluences. For lower-fluence (1.0 × 1010 ions/cm2) irradiation, a hillock is observed, surrounded by a faint halo-like damaged zone with a diameter of about 150 µm (r~v2)22, in addition to a pit on the hillock center with a diameter of about 9 µm (r~v)22, as shown in images A, a and a′. This defect halo was formed by spatial spreading of valence holes22.
With increasing ion fluence, the molten atoms spread across the surface, after they were poured out along the ions’ trajectory, as shown in image B of Fig. 4. As the ion fluence increases further, a spiral-like layered hillock with a diameter of about 30 µm, resembling a volcanic-cone structure, was formed, as shown in images C and c. Generally speaking, as the fluence increases, the diameter of the hillock also rapidly increases. However, except for Ga and N, the O, C, and Al elements also appear around and on a hillock (Figs. 4a1,b1 and c1), indicating that the sapphire (Al2O3) substrate decomposes into Al and O at high temperature. Moreover, molten Al and O atoms diffuse into GaN along the heated trajectory, and subsequently they were pushed onto the GaN surface by extrusion force from the undamaged lattice through the ion path. In addition, note that the N content is very low on the irradiated surface; N loss was also observed in our previous experiment23.
Microstructure and electrical properties analysis
Figure 5 shows the high-resolution X-ray-diffraction patterns and rocking curves of a GaN (0002) peak after irradiation with 290-MeV U32+ ions at fluences from 1.0 × 109 to 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2. (ω-2θ) and ω scan patterns of the GaN (0002) peak were performed, separately. According to standard XRD patterns of AlN (JCPDS, Card, No. 08–0262) and GaN (JCPDS, Card, No. 02–1078), the un-irradiated sample exhibits a sharp GaN (0002) peak and a broad AlGaN (0002) peak located at 2θ = 34.65° and 35.32°, respectively. This observation is generally consistent with the results reported in the literatures10,24. After irradiation, the intensity of the GaN (0002) and the AlGaN (0002) peaks decreases generally with increasing incident ion fluence. The original diffraction peaks of the GaN (0002) and the AlGaN (0002) lattice shift towards smaller angle and the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the GaN is found to increase from 0.14° to 0.17° with increasing ion fluence, indicating that the expansion and distortion in GaN and AlGaN crystal lattices occur, in addition to compressive stress produced along the ion incident direction. This shift and broadening of the GaN (0002) peak are mainly due to stress regions and the creation of various defects.
Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 5, with increasing ion fluence, the FWHM of the (0002) crystal plane in the rocking curve graph also increases. This broadening of the FWHM of the (0002) plane in X-ray rocking curves is mainly induced by the rotation and tilt of lattice planes, as well as by strain fields for single-crystal GaN due to the production of dislocation loops and screw dislocations25,26,27. The 290-MeV U32+ ions pass through a 3-µm-GaN film and stop in the Al2O3 (Fig. 1). During this energy deposition process, high electron energy loss (40.88 keV/nm) not only can induce latent tracks and dislocation loops in GaN, but can also generate screw dislocations in GaN due to high temperature and high stress. The latter was perhaps embodied from cracks, layered hillocks and surface compositions observed from AFM and SEM images (Figs 2 and 4). Similar phenomena were observed by several groups in SHI-irradiated III-V nitrides via TEM, AFM and HRXRD techniques9,13,26,27.
According to the equation28
where, ρ s is the dislocation density, β(0002) the FWHM of the (0002) crystal plane in the rocking curve graph, and b c the Burgers vector parallel to the c axis. For a hexagonal GaN, b c = 0.5185 nm29. we can obtain the dislocation density at different fluences. The variation of the dislocation density with the fluence of 290-MeV U32+ ions is given in Table 1. The dislocation density initially increases very slowly up to a fluence of 1 × 1011 ions/cm2. Above this fluence, it increases rapidly with respect to fluence; this drastic increase was interpreted as being caused by mutual spatial tangles and penetrations between the dislocations. The dislocation production is mainly ascribed to the release of the strain due to lattice expansion and defect creation.
Figure 6 shows the β-Ga2O3 X-ray diffraction pattern of 290-MeV U32+ ions-irradiated GaN/Al2O3 with fluences from 1.0 × 109 to 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2. The peak 2θ~31.15° is attributed to the β-Ga2O3 (−202) diffractive peak30. The formation of Ga2O3 is due to the dissociation of Al2O3 and the mixture of Al2O3/GaN31. Moreover, the diffraction peak of the Ga2O3 lattice shifts towards smaller angle with increasing ion fluence. Similarly, Kumar et al.32 reported the mixing of Al2O3/GaN using 100-MeV Ni9+ ions. Sarvesh et al.33 reported the mixing of Cu/Ge bilayers due to the irradiation with 120-MeV Ag ions. The formation of Ga2O3 may be useful to understand the role of electrical transport behavior in semiconductor/substrate materials32.
Figure 7 shows the room temperature Raman scattering spectra of the pristine and the GaN epilayer irradiated with 290-MeV U32+ ions at different fluences. In the spectra of all the samples, the peaks near 144, 570, 740 cm−1 are the first-order phonon frequencies of the E2 (low), E2 (high), and A1 [longitudinal optical (LO)] phonon, respectively34,35, reflecting the characteristics of the hexagonal-crystal-phase GaN. After irradiation with successively increasing fluence, the strain-sensitive E2 (high) phonon band blueshifts and broadens in FWHM generally, indicating that the irradiated GaN samples experience compressive stress along the z axis (//c)36, matching with the results obtained from HRXRD measurements. Furthermore, such a blueshift also indicates that the length of the Ga-N bond is shortened, the bond energy of the Ga-N increases, and defects are generated. When the fluence increases to 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2, both the E2 (high) and A1 (LO) phonon modes completely disappear, indicating that the violation of Raman selection rules in this backscattering geometry occurs due to surface-specific tilt or twist caused by strain relief. Meanwhile, a slope-like feature between 100 and 200 cm−1 is observed for the highest fluence irradiation (1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2), because GaN lattices are disordered, which leads to a loss of translational periodicity and, hence, the relaxation of q = 0 conservation. In addition, the peak at 417 cm−1 entirely disappears for the highest fluence irradiation (1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2), indicating that this peak is a vibration mode of the N-rich Ga-N bond configuration, and does not come from the sapphire substrate37. Compared with the Raman spectra of GaN implanted by various ions with different fluences reported elsewhere36,38,39. The peaks at 300 and 670 cm−1 attributed to disorder-activated Raman scattering (DARS) related to Ga and N vacancies did not arise in our measurements, because O and Al occupy the vacancies of N and Ga due to the sapphire substrate decomposition. Furthermore, the O impurities obstruct the preferential removal of N atoms due to the larger electronegativity of O atoms40. In addition, the projected range of U32+ ions is much larger than the thickness of GaN films, and the irradiation resulted in an almost homogeneous energy deposition in the GaN film mainly through the intense electronic energy deposition process in this experiment, as shown in Fig. 1. There are no Raman peaks from Ga2O3 due to the non-fulfillment of Raman selection rules under this scattering geometry.
The A1 (LO) phonon band is composed of the unscreened-LO mode originating in the surface depletion layer and the LO phonon-plasmon coupled mode41. Similar studies were reported by several groups42,43,44. For n-type GaN, acceptors on the surface capture the electrons from the conduction band, forming a space charge region near the surface with positive charges and producing an electric field towards the inside from the surface. This leads to n-type GaN’s energy band bending upwards near the surface, deviating from the Femi energy level. Therefore, the electron concentration is lower near the surface compared to that of the inside. Thus, a surface depletion layer is formed. Plasmon polaritons and free carriers nearly do not exist in the depletion layer. The A1 (LO) phonon band broadens with asymmetric line shape, because of the phonon confinement effect and the broken longitudinal symmetry caused by a high surface-to-volume ratio due to the formation of nano-hillocks at the surface45. In order to extract the electrical information from a coupled LO phonon-damped plasmon mode, we separated the A1 (LO) phonon band into the unscreened-LO peak (ULO) and LO phonon-plasmon coupled peak (LOPC), and plotted the values of the AULO/ALOPC area ratio versus ion fluence, as shown in Fig. 8. With increasing ion fluence, the area of the unscreened LO peak increases generally, indicating that the surface depletion zone thickness increases continuously due to the growing surface damage46, which is in good agreement with AFM observations.
The scattering mechanisms of the LOPC peak separated from the A1(LO) phonon band are the LO phonon-plasmon coupled modes. For a hexagonal crystal, the Raman intensity profile is expressed by47
where, for GaN, \({\omega }_{\ell }\) and ω t are the frequencies of LO and TO phonon, \({\omega }_{\ell }\) = 735 cm−1 and ω t = 533 cm−1, respectively; ε is the dielectric function; and \({\varepsilon }_{\infty }\) is the high-frequency dielectric constant, \({\varepsilon }_{\infty }\) = 5.35. e is the electron charge; γ is the plasmon damping constant; Γ is the phonon damping constant; ω p is the plasmon frequency; n is the free-carrier concentration; and m* is the effective mass of the free carrier, \({m}^{\ast }=0.2{m}_{e}\). μ is the free-carrier mobility, ω is the Raman frequency shift, C is the Faust-Henry coefficient48, and C and S are considered as constant coefficients. Taking ω p , γ, Γ, and C in Eq. (2) as fitting parameters, we fitted the LOPC peak line shape to obtain the ω p , γ, Γ, and C values. The coupled mode in each sample is normalized by the peak intensity. The fitting line shape of the LOPC peak for 1 × 109 ions/cm2 irradiation is displayed in Fig. 9. LOPC peaks of all specimens were fitted in the same way. The values of n and μ are derived from the fitting parameters ω p and γ, respectively, according to Eqs (3) and (4). The results of fitting and calculation are given in Table 2.
As shown in Table 2, the free-carrier concentration decreases with increasing ion fluence. In n-type GaN, the free-carrier concentration n = N d −N a , and ON and CGa are shallow donors49, while CN is a more stable shallow acceptor50. Moreover, the charged dislocation is an acceptor-like defect51. The aforementioned decrease can mainly be attributed to the compensation effect due to the growing charged dislocations (acceptor-like defects) with increasing ion fluence, which was revealed by HRXRD. Furthermore, the difficult excitation of electrons in the valance band caused by an increase in the band gap due to Ga2O3 formation also accounts for this reduction in free-carrier concentration52. Table 2 also shows that the free-carrier mobility first increases and then exhibits a decrease with increasing ion fluence. The mobility of free carriers depends on various scattering mechanisms. For lower-fluence irradiation, the expansion of lattices results in a weakness from lattice vibration scattering. Moreover, the carrier mobility µ = µ d + µ a , many donors (ON, CGa)49 and acceptors (CN)50 were generated at lower-fluence irradiation. As the ion fluence increases, the charged dislocations dominate the scattering mechanism, which leads to a degradation in the carrier mobility51. Only when the distance between the charged dislocations is less than a certain value, can the dislocations be predominate with respect to the carrier mobility53.
Conclusions
Irradiation with 290-MeV 238U32+ ions on MOCVD-grown n-GaN/Al2O3 epilayers was carried out at room temperature at fluences from 1.0 × 109 to 1.0 × 1012 ions/cm2. The irradiated samples were characterized using AFM, SEM, HRXRD, and Raman scattering measurements. The mixture of GaN/Al2O3 is ascribed to the dissociation of Al2O3 substrate as a result of high electron energy loss of the U32+ ion. Hillock formation on the GaN surface is the representation of dislocation occurrence, and the density of both the hillock and the dislocation increases with increasing ion fluence. Moreover, dislocations remarkably affect the atoms and charges transport due to the stress field, electrostatic field and dangling bonds around the dislocation line. The significant amount of charged dislocation-defects produced enhance the trapping and scattering of the free carriers, leading to a reduction in free-carrier concentration and a general degradation in free-carrier mobility. Meanwhile, dislocations provide passages for Al and O elements to spread upward, promoting the generation of Ga2O3. In contrast to other experiments15,22,54, no N and Ga vacancies were generated, and the damage to GaN/Al2O3 from 290-MeV U32+ -ion irradiation is less than that of from other SHIs at the same fluence due to the incorporation of O and Al elements and Ga2O3 formation. These results suggest that the properties and performance of Ш-nitride semiconductor devices working in radiation environments could be improved by selecting the proper substrate materials, such as Al2O3, SiO2, Si3N4, SiC, and Si. Further work is needed to clarify it.
References
Nakamura, S. The roles of structural imperfections in InGaN-based blue light-emitting diodes and laser diodes. Science 281, 956–961 (1998).
Kucheyev, S. O., Williams, J. S. & Pearton, S. J. Ion implantation into GaN. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 33, 51–108 (2001).
Lin, Y. H., Zhou, S. Z. & Wang, W. L. Performance improvement of GaN-based light emitting diodes grown on Si(111) substrates by controlling the reactor pressure for the GaN nucleation layer growth. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 1484–1490 (2015).
Wang, W. L., Yang, W. J. & Gao, F. L. Highly-efficient GaN-based light-emitting diode wafers on La0.3Sr1.7AlTaO6 substrates. Sci. Rep. 5, 9315 (2015).
Li, G. Q., Wang, W. L. & Yang, W. J. GaN-based light-emitting diodes on various substrates: a critical review. Rep. Prop. Phys. 79, 056501 (2016).
Li, G. Q., Wang, W. L. & Yang, W. J. Epitaxial growth of group III-nitride films by pulsed laser deposition and their use in the development of LED devices. Surf. Sci. Rep. 70, 380–423 (2015).
Wang, W. L., Wang, H. Y. & Yang, W. J. A new approach to epitaxially grow high-quality GaN films on Si substrates: the combination of MBE and PLD. Sci. Rep. 6, 24448 (2016).
Wesch, W., Kamarou, A. & Wendler, E. Effect of high electronic energy deposition in semiconductors. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 225, 111–128 (2004).
Kucheyev, S. O. et al. Lattice damage produced in GaN by swift heavy ions. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 5360–5365 (2004).
Kumar, V. S. et al. Effect of swift heavy ions of silver and oxygen onGaN. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 244, 145–148 (2006).
Kumar, V. S. et al. Investigations on the 100 MeV Au7+ ion irradiation of GaN. Semicon. Sci. Technol. 22, 511–516 (2007).
Karlušić, M. et al. Response of GaN to energetic ion irradiation: conditions for ion track formation. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 325304–325315 (2015).
Mansouri, S. et al. Swift heavy ions effects in III–V nitrides. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 266, 2814–2818 (2008).
Zhang, C. H. et al. Damage accumulation in gallium nitride irradiated with various energetic heavy ions. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 256, 199–206 (2007).
Kumar, A. et al. Defect formation in GaN epitaxial layers due to SHI irradiation. Radiat Eff. Defects Solids 166, 739–742 (2011).
Sonia, G. et al. 2 MeV ion irradiation effects on AlGaN/GaN HFET devices. Solid-State Electron 52, 1011–1017 (2008).
Titov, A. I., Karaseov, P. A. & Kucheyev, S. O. Furthering the understanding of ion-irradiation-induced electrical isolation in wide band-gap semiconductors. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 243, 79–82 (2006).
Greco, G., Iucolano, F. & Roccaforte, F. Ohmic contacts to Gallium Nitride materials. Appl. Sur. Sci. 379, 324–345 (2016).
Klein, M. V. Light Scattering in Solids (ed. Cardona, M.) 147–157 (Springer, Berlin, 1975).
El-Said, A. S. et al. Surface nanostructuring of SrTiO3 single crystals by slow highly charged ions and swift heavy ions. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 296, 1234–1237 (2011).
Gossick, B. R. Disordered regions in semiconductors bombarded by fast neutrons. J.Appl. Phys. 30, 1214–1218 (1959).
Medvedev, N. A., Schwartz, K., Trautmann, C. & Volkov, A. E. Formation of the defect halo of swift heavy ion tracks in LiF due to spatial redistribution of valence holes. Phys. Status Solidi. (b) 250, 850–857 (2013).
Zhang, L. Q. et al. Structures and optical properties of Kr23+ and Ne8+-irradiated GaN epi-layers. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 307, 60–63 (2013).
Metzger, T. H. et al. X-ray diffraction study of gallium nitride grown by MOCVD. Phys. Status. Solidi. (b) 193, 391–397 (1996).
Ayers, J. E. et al. The measurement of threading dislocation densities in semiconductor crystals by X-ray diffraction. J. Cryst. Growth. 135, 71–77 (1994).
Sathish, N. et al. HRXRD, AFM and optical study of damage created by swift heavy ion irradiation in GaN epitaxial layers. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 256, 281–287 (2007).
Pathak, A. P. et al. Swift heavy-ion modification of semiconductor heterostructures. Radiat Eff. Defects Solids 162, 131–150 (2007).
Lee, S. R. et al. Effect of threading dislocations on the Bragg peakwidths of GaN, AlGaN, and AlN heterolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 241904-1–241904-3 (2005).
Vennéguès, P. et al. Reduction mechanisms for defect densities in GaN using one- or two-step epitaxial lateral overgrowth methods. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 4175–4181 (2000).
International Center for Diffractive Data, Powder Diffraction File No. 41–1103 (1978).
Kumar, V. S. et al. Investigations on 40 MeV Li3+ ions irradiated GaN epilayers. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 266, 1799–1803 (2008).
Kumar, V. S. et al. Effect of 100 MeV Ni9+ ion irradiation on MOCVD grown n-GaN. Phys. B 406, 4210–4213 (2011).
Kumar, S. et al. Swift heavy ions induced mixing in metal/semiconductor system. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 266, 1759–1763 (2008).
Azuhata, T. et al. S. Polarized Raman spectra inGaN. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 7, L129–L133 (1995).
Davydov, V. Y. et al. Phonon dispersion and Raman scattering in hexagonal GaN and AlN. Phys. Rev. B 58, 12899–12907 (1998).
Katsikini, M. et al. Raman study of Mg, Si, O, and N implanted GaN. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 4389–4394 (2003).
Ning, J. Q. et al. 418 cm−1 Raman scattering from gallium nitride nanowires: Is it a vibration mode of N-rich Ga–N bond configuration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 103117-1–103117-3 (2007).
Limmer, W. et al. Raman scattering in ion-implanted GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2589–2591 (1998).
Pollard, W. et al. Vibrational properties of amorphous GaN. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 283, 203–210 (2001).
Kawakami, R. et al. Comparison between AlGaN surfaces etched by carbon tetrafluoride and argon plasmas: Effect of the fluorine impurities incorporated in the surface. Vacuum 119, 264–269 (2015).
Wang, P. D. et al. Raman scattering of coupled longitudinal optical phonon-plasmon modes in dry etched n+-GaAs. J. Appl. Phys. 71, 3754–3759 (1992).
Steele, J. A. et al. Raman scattering reveals strong LO-phonon-hole-plasmon coupling in nominally undoped GaAsBi: optical determination of carrier concentration. Opt. Express 22, 11680–11689 (2014).
Talaat, H. et al. Photomodulation of the coupled plasmon–LO phonon of GaAs surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 5829–5835 (2003).
Altan, H. et al. Direct observation of the strength of plasmon-longitudinal optical phonon interaction in n-type GaAs. Appl. Phys. Lett 89, 052110-1–052110-3 (2006).
Jeganathan, K. et al. Raman scattering of phonon-plasmon coupled modes in self-assembled GaN nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 123707-1–123707-1-5 (2009).
Mlayah, A. et al. Raman study of longitudinal optical phonon-plasmon coupling and disorder effects in heavily Be-doped GaAs. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4064–4070 (1991).
Yugami, H. et al. Characterization of the free-carrier concentrations in doped β-SiC crystals by Raman scattering. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 354–358 (1987).
Faust, W. L. & Henry, C. H. Mixing of Visible and Near-Resonance Infrared Light in GaP. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1265–1268 (1966).
Neugebauer, J. & Walle, C. G. V. Gallium vacancies and the yellow luminescence in GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 503–505 (1996).
Seager, C. H., Wright, A. F., Yu, J. & Gotz, W. Role of carbon in GaN. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6553–6560 (2002).
Ng, H. M., Doppalapudi, D., Moustakas, T. D., Weimann, N. & Eastman, L. F. The role of dislocation scattering in n-type GaN films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 821–823 (1998).
Sheu, J. K. & Chi, G. C. The doping process and dopant characteristics of GaN. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 14, R657–R702 (2002).
Jahn, U. et al. Carrier capture by threading dislocations in (In,Ga)N/GaN heteroepitaxial layers. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125314-1–125314-5 (2010).
Kumar, M. S., Sonia, G., Kanjilal, D., Dhanasekaran, R. & Kumar, J. Electrical and optical isolation of GaN by high energy ion irradiation. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 207, 308–313 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11675231, 11105191, 91426304) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.: 2010CB832904). The authors are grateful to Suzhou Institute of Nano-tech and Nano-bionics (SINANO) of Chinese Academy of Sciences for Raman scattering spectrum and AFM measurements, and also thank the staff members running the SFC in Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Q. Zhang and C.H. Zhang analyzed experiment data and wrote the main manuscript text. J.J. Li and Y.C. Meng conducted the AFM, SEM, HRXRD and Raman measurement. Y.T. Yang, Y. Song, Z.N. Ding and T.X.Yan performed the specimens’ irradiation experiment. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L.Q., Zhang, C.H., Li, J.J. et al. Damage to epitaxial GaN layer on Al2O3 by 290-MeV 238U32+ ions irradiation. Sci Rep 8, 4121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22321-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22321-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.