Enteropathogenic E. coli effectors EspF and Map independently disrupt tight junctions through distinct mechanisms involving transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation

Singh, Anand Prakash; Sharma, Swati; Pagarware, Kirti; Siraji, Rafay Anwar; Ansari, Imran; Mandal, Anupam; Walling, Pangertoshi; Aijaz, Saima

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22017-1

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 February 2018

Enteropathogenic E. coli effectors EspF and Map independently disrupt tight junctions through distinct mechanisms involving transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation

Anand Prakash Singh ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-1366¹^na1,
Swati Sharma¹^na1,
Kirti Pagarware¹^na1,
Rafay Anwar Siraji¹^na1,
Imran Ansari¹^na1,
Anupam Mandal¹,
Pangertoshi Walling¹ &
…
Saima Aijaz ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7512-9859¹

Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 3719 (2018) Cite this article

3484 Accesses
12 Citations
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Enteropathogenic E. coli infection is characterized by rapid onset of diarrhea but the underlying mechanisms are not well defined. EPEC targets the tight junctions which selectively regulate the permeability of charged and uncharged molecules. Cooperative actions of the EPEC effectors EspF and Map have been reported to mediate tight junction disruption. To analyze the individual contributions of EspF and Map, we generated in vitro models where EspF and Map, derived from the EPEC strain E2348/69, were constitutively expressed in epithelial cells. Here we report that tight junction disruption by EspF and Map is caused by the inhibition of the junctional recruitment of proteins during tight junction assembly. Constitutive expression of EspF and Map depleted the levels of tight junction proteins. EspF down-regulated the transcript levels of claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1, while Map down-regulated only claudin-1 transcripts. Both effectors also caused lysosomal degradation of existing tight junction proteins. We also identified a novel interaction of Map with non-muscle myosin II. Consistent with earlier studies, EspF was found to interact with ZO-1 while actin was the common interacting partner for both effectors. Our data provides evidence for the distinct roles of Map and EspF in tight junction disruption through non-synergistic functions.

Highly-conserved regulatory activity of the ANR family in the virulence of diarrheagenic bacteria through interaction with master and global regulators

Article Open access 29 April 2023

Diana Rodriguez-Valverde, Jorge A. Giron, … Araceli E. Santiago

Host CDK-1 and formin mediate microvillar effacement induced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Article Open access 04 January 2021

Cheng-Rung Huang, Cheng-Ju Kuo, … Chang-Shi Chen

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin drives enteropathic changes in small intestinal epithelia

Article Open access 12 November 2022

Alaullah Sheikh, Brunda Tumala, … James M. Fleckenstein

Introduction

Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a leading cause of infant diarrhea in developing countries^1,2. EPEC colonizes the intestinal epithelial cells and uses a type III secretion system to translocate more than twenty effector proteins into the host cells³. EPEC infection is characterized by the increased permeability of solutes through the intestinal epithelial cells. The cells of the intestinal epithelium adhere to each other through adhesive complexes which include tight junctions (TJ), adherens junctions and desmosomes^4,5. TJs are the most apical of the junctional complexes and are crucial for the formation of a semi-permeable barrier that selectively regulates the passage of charged and uncharged molecules^4,5. TJs are complex structures that consist of transmembrane proteins as well as a cytoplasmic plaque comprising of proteins that are involved in multiple cellular functions including the regulation of permeability, polarity, cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation^4,5. The transmembrane proteins of the TJs include claudins, occludin, tricellulin and junctional adhesion molecules which contain extracellular domains involved in the sealing of adjacent cells^4,5,6. The C-termini of the transmembrane proteins are linked to cytoplasmic plaque proteins which include the zonula occludens (ZO) proteins, kinases, phosphatases, GTPases, exchange factors and transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators^4,5,6. These cytoplasmic plaque proteins are in turn linked to the actin cytoskeleton and serve as a connection between the transmembrane proteins and the peri-junctional actinomyosin ring. Permeability through TJs is primarily regulated by claudins and occludin although cytoplasmic plaque proteins such as the ZO proteins and exchange factors that activate Rho GTPases have also been linked to the regulation of permeability^4,5,6,7. While occludin and claudins directly regulate the permeability of uncharged and charged molecules respectively, the adaptor protein ZO-1 regulates this process through the modulation of the actin cytoskeleton^4,5,6,7,8.

TJ disruption is a common feature associated with microbial pathogenesis^9,10. EPEC also targets the TJ complex leading to the displacement of several TJ proteins and increased permeability through the intestinal epithelium^2,3. Of the many effectors translocated into the host cell by EPEC, only EspF, EspG1/G2, Map and NleA have been so far reported to disrupt the TJ barrier^11,12,13. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms employed by these effectors to disrupt the TJs. One limitation has been the non-availability of a suitable model system that mimics the process of human infection. So far, studies to understand the molecular basis of EPEC-mediated TJ disruption have relied either on in vivo models (infections of rabbits and mice with the related rabbit (REPEC) or mouse (C. rodentium) strains of EPEC) or in vitro models (infections of cultured epithelial cells with the human EPEC strain E2348/69)¹⁴. These studies have provided significant insights into the pathogenesis of EPEC infections. For example, in vivo mouse models where C. rodentium was used to infect mice revealed the process of attaching/effacing pathogenesis in greater detail¹⁵. Studies conducted in other in vivo mouse models, where EPEC infected C57BL/6 J mice were used, revealed that these mice were susceptible to EPEC infection and later studies showed that EPEC-mediated TJ disruption was accompanied by the displacement of occludin and ZO-1 from the membrane to the cytoplasm while a mutant EPEC strain lacking EspF had no effect on the barrier function indicating an important role of EspF in mediating TJ disruption^16,17,18. In vitro models using HeLa, Caco-2 or T84 cells infected with wild type EPEC have revealed that EPEC infection decreases transepithelial resistance, a measure of TJ integrity, and increases electrolyte transport^19,20,21. Using these in vitro models, EPEC was shown to dislocate occludin from the TJs which was mediated by EspF^22,23. Subsequent studies using polarized Caco-2 cells revealed that the EPEC effector Map can also disrupt TJs independently of EspF¹¹. This was further confirmed by infection of HeLa cells with C. rodentium as well as in mice infected with C. rodentium²⁴. However, conflicting data exists regarding the roles of EspF and Map in barrier disruption. Some studies have indicated that synergistic actions of Map and EspF are required for TJ dysfunction; other studies have suggested that Map might exert a greater effect on TJs and another in vivo study using C. rodentium has shown that EspF but not Map plays an important role in the disruption of the TJ barrier in vivo^11,25,26. Therefore, the independent roles of EspF and Map in disrupting TJs are unclear.

EspF is a 206 amino acid protein that contains an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting signal (amino acids 1–24), a nucleolus targeting signal (amino acids 21–74) and three proline-rich repeats (PRR) at the C-terminus²⁷. Map is a 203 amino acid protein which is also targeted to the mitochondria and has been reported to induce transient filopodia^28,29. Several lines of evidence suggest that EspF and Map may not have redundant functions. For example, EspF has been reported to disrupt the host cell mitochondria and nucleolus, remodel the plasma membrane by binding with sorting nexin 9 (SNX9) and promote actin polymerization by binding and activation of neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP)^27,30. Its role in causing diarrhea has been linked to its ability to disrupt TJs, inactivate the sodium hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3) and in association with the bacterial surface protein Intimin and its receptor Tir inactivate the sucrose glucose cotransporter-1 (SGLT-1)^11,25,27,31. Map also disrupts the host mitochondria, inactivates SGLT-1 and increases TJ permeability^11,25. Additionally, Map interacts with Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger regulatory factors 1 and 2 (NHERF1, -2)^32,33. These studies indicate that except for their effect on mitochondrial and SGLT-1 functions, EspF and Map do not target the same signaling pathways. We therefore hypothesized that EspF and Map might also have distinct roles in junctional barrier defects.

In order to examine the individual contributions of EspF and Map on TJ integrity, we generated an in vitro model in which the gene encoding EspF or Map, derived from EPEC O127:H6 strain E2348/69, was fused N-terminally with EGFP and stably integrated into MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) cells for the constitutive expression of these effectors. We used the MDCK cell line as it is a prototypic cell line for the study of TJ assembly. MDCK cells are widely used to study the biology of influenza virus^34,35,36. MDCK cells have also been employed for understanding the cellular basis of EPEC infection. For example, MDCK and HEK (human embryonic kidney) cells were successfully infected with wild type EPEC to show the role of host cell plasma membrane phosphoinositides on EPEC adherence³⁷. Similarly, MDCK cells infected with wild type EPEC have been used to show the recruitment of the podosome-specific scavenger protein Tks5 to the site of EPEC attachment in a Tir-dependent manner³⁸. Additionally, earlier studies have reported the use of MDCK cells to examine the effect of EPEC infection on TJ barrier resistance and permeability²⁰. Elegant studies involving transient and regulated expression of EPEC effectors in MDCK cells have revealed the involvement of EspG in TJ disruption^12,39 and the role of EspF on cell polarity and membrane trafficking^30,40. We recently reported that constitutive expression of Map in an in vitro MDCK model is sufficient to disrupt TJs⁴¹. We now report the generation of a similar model for EspF and have used both the EspF and Map in vitro models to examine the roles of these effectors on TJ barrier function. The idea behind this study was to delineate the individual functions of these effectors on epithelial TJs in a bacteria-free system with no interference from other EPEC effectors. Here, we demonstrate that EspF and Map are independently sufficient to disrupt TJ integrity. Both effectors prevent the recruitment of occludin and claudin(s) into TJs during junction assembly leading to the aberrant localization of the proteins in the cytoplasm and their eventual depletion. A comparison of relative gene expression profiles of claudin-1, claudin-4 and occludin in the stable cell lines expressing EspF and Map indicated that these effectors have distinct roles in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of TJ proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the previously reported interaction of EspF with ZO-1 and that of both effectors with actin^42,43 highlighting that the MDCK model is comparable to other in vitro models. Further, we identified a novel interaction of Map with non-muscle myosin II. Our data suggests that EspF and Map target functionally distinct signaling pathways to mediate TJ disruption.

Results

Constitutive expression of EspF and Map disrupts TJ integrity in MDCK cell lines

The genes encoding EspF and Map, derived from the human EPEC strain E2348/69, were cloned in pEGFP-C1 vector to generate N-terminal EGFP-tagged EspF and Map constructs. These constructs were then stably integrated into MDCK cells to generate stable cell lines constitutively expressing EspF or Map. We first confirmed the validity of EspF and Map in vitro MDCK models by assessing the effect of these proteins on transepithelial resistance (TER) and paracellular permeability in confluent cells. Stable cell lines expressing EGFP-EspF or EGFP-Map were grown on permeable Transwell filters until fully confluent monolayers were formed. Untransfected MDCK cells (UT), stable cells lines expressing empty pEGFP-C1 vector (EGFP) and stable cells lines expressing EGFP-tagged Tir (Translocated Intimin Receptor, Tir) were used as controls. TER was measured daily for all samples and maximum values were attained in 7 days for all cell lines (Fig. 1). The maximum TER values of EspF and Map cell lines were determined and compared with the maximum TER values obtained for untransfected MDCK cells. Cells expressing EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map displayed maximum TER values which were only 0.38 fold and 0.65 fold of the maximum TER values of untransfected cells respectively (Fig. 1A). Cells expressing either EGFP vector alone or EGFP-Tir displayed TER values comparable to untransfected cells. We next evaluated the effect of EspF and Map on the flux of small and large uncharged tracers (4 kDa and 70 kDa dextran). As compared to untransfected cells (normalized to 1), cells expressing EspF exhibited an increase of 2.57 fold in the flux of the 4 kDa tracer and 1.97 fold in the flux of the 70 kDa tracer (Fig. 1B,C). Map expression increased the flux of 4 kDa dextran by 1.55 fold and had no significant effect on the flux of 70 kDa dextran (Fig. 1B,C). The permeability of 4 kDa and 70 kDa dextran in cells expressing EGFP vector and EGFP-Tir was not significantly different from untransfected cells. These data indicate that, consistent with previous studies, both effectors increased the permeability of charged and uncharged molecules. Since the TJ constituent proteins claudin(s), occludin and ZO-1 have been linked to the regulation of TJ permeability, we examined the cellular localisation of these proteins in cells constitutively expressing EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map. Claudins belong to a large family comprising of at least 24 members which are often co-expressed. While some members of the claudin family play a role in adhesion, others regulate the permeability of ions⁴⁴. In this study, we have focussed on claudin-1 and claudin-4 since these claudins have been reported to play an important role in the regulation of TJ barrier function in MDCK cells^45,46. Cellular localisation using specific antibodies revealed that claudin-1 and −4 were localised at mature TJs in all the control cell lines (untransfected, EGFP and Tir) but not in cells expressing EspF and Map where these claudins were found to be predominantly accumulated in the cytoplasm with reduced staining at TJs. The staining of occludin was observed to be markedly discontinuous and reduced at TJs in EspF and Map cell lines while ZO-1 staining appeared to be marginally reduced but was normally localised at TJs (Fig. 1D). These observations are consistent with studies in other in vitro models which have shown that EspF and Map reorganise TJ proteins^22,23,42. To examine if EspF and Map had the same effect upon ectopic expression in intestinal epithelial cells, we expressed EspF and Map in the intestinal epithelial cell line, T84. Fully confluent monolayers of T84 cells (with well assembled TJs) were transiently transfected with plasmid constructs encoding EGFP-EspF or EGFP-Map and the cellular localisation of TJ proteins was examined after 24 hours. Similar to MDCK cells, we found that claudin-1, -4 and occludin showed reduced staining at TJs while ZO-1 staining was only marginally affected (Supplementary Figure S1). Control cells expressing EGFP vector or EGFP-Tir displayed normal junctional localization of TJ proteins in T84 cells.

EspF and Map inhibit de novo tight junction assembly

The assembly of TJs is a dynamic process involving continuous remodeling events where existing junctional proteins are internalized and replaced with new proteins⁴⁷. In order to examine if TJ biogenesis is affected in the presence of EspF and Map, we employed the calcium switch model⁴⁸. This model has been reported to mimic the process of epithelial morphogenesis and is widely used to study the de novo assembly of TJs in MDCK cells in a synchronised manner⁴⁹. In this method, cells are first maintained in low calcium (<5 µM) medium to disrupt cell-cell junctions and apical-basolateral polarization and then switched to normal calcium (1.8 mM) medium in which the cells rapidly polarize and develop intercellular junctions⁴⁹. Earlier studies on this model have revealed that in MDCK cells, maximum TER values are attained within 12–16 hours of the addition of normal calcium medium due to the exocytotic fusion of the TJ components at the plasma membrane, after which the TER drops to steady state values of 50–60 Ωxcm² in these cells^48,50. To determine whether EspF and Map can independently interfere with junction dynamics, all cell lines were grown on membrane filters in low calcium medium for 18–20 hours to disrupt existing junctions. Junction assembly was then initiated by the addition of normal calcium medium. The assembly of TJs was monitored by measuring TER after each hour. Cells constitutively expressing EGFP alone or EGFP-Tir showed TER values comparable to untransfected MDCK cells indicating that neither the EGFP vector nor a control EPEC effector (Tir) affected junction assembly (Fig. 2A,B). The TER values in the two biological replicates of EspF-expressing cell lines were ~48% and ~49% (Fig. 2C) while those of Map-expressing cell lines were ~46% and ~48% (Fig. 2D) as compared to untransfected cell lines. The starting TER values in the first 2 hours after switching to normal calcium medium were 20 ± 4 Ωxcm² for all cell lines. However, after 2 hours the TER values in EspF and Map cells lines lagged behind the TER values of untransfected cells. We next determined the extent to which the junctional pore size had increased due to the expression of EspF or Map. After the completion of the TER experiment, the cells lines were incubated with fluorescently labeled dextran tracers of 4 kDa and 70 kDa. As compared to untransfected cells (normalized to 1), EspF cell lines exhibited an increase of ~3.6 fold and ~2.7 fold in the permeability of the 4 kDa dextran and 70 kDa dextran respectively (Fig. 2E,F). In contrast, Map cell lines exhibited an increase of ~1.4 fold in the permeability of the 4 kDa tracer and had no effect on the permeability of the 70 kDa tracer (Fig. 2E,F). Taken together, these data indicate that both effectors decrease TER to a similar extent during junction assembly but their role in increasing the permeability of non-charged tracers is markedly different with EspF exerting a more significant effect than Map. These effects were specific to Map and EspF as EGFP-tagged Tir did not have any significant effect on the permeability of 4 kDa and 70 kDa tracers (Fig. 2E,F).

EspF and Map prevent junctional recruitment of proteins during de novo TJ assembly

We next assessed the cellular localization of TJ proteins during de novo junction assembly in EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines. After 14 hours in normal calcium medium (when maximum TER values were obtained for all cell lines), junctional recruitment of proteins was found to be complete in untransfected, EGFP and Tir cell lines but not in EspF and Map cell lines which showed an aberrant distribution of TJ proteins. The expression of EspF and Map itself was localized in the cytoplasm as well as the plasma membrane of cells (Fig. 3). In EspF cell lines, claudin-1 and claudin-4 were mostly localized in the cytoplasm. For occludin and ZO-1, only discontinuous localization was observed at the TJs (Fig. 3). In the Map cell lines, claudin-1 and −4 were localized in the cytoplasm in punctate structures while occludin and ZO-1 were recruited to the tight junctions but their expression was low and junctional localization was discontinuous (Fig. 3). Cells expressing either EGFP vector alone or EGFP-Tir showed normal localization pattern of all the TJ proteins. These data indicate that EspF and Map compromise junction integrity by inhibiting the recruitment of TJ proteins into newly forming junctions.

Constitutive expression of EspF and Map depletes the levels of tight junction proteins

As the immunofluorescence data suggested that EspF and Map expression caused reduced staining of proteins at the TJs, we hypothesized that EspF and Map might be either inhibiting the expression of TJ proteins or preventing their integration into the TJ complex without affecting total levels. We first assessed the total levels of junctional proteins in cell lysates derived from untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines (Fig. 4). The total levels of TJ proteins showed a significant decrease in EspF and Map cell lines but not in cell lines expressing EGFP alone or EGFP-Tir (Fig. 4A,B). In the two Map cell lines, the levels of claudin-1, claudin-4, and occludin were reduced to ~0.4 ± 0.04 fold, ~0.6 ± 0.16 fold, and ~0.5 ± 0.03 fold respectively as compared to untransfected cells while no significant reduction was observed for ZO-1 (Fig. 4A,B). Similarly, in the two EspF cell lines, the levels of claudin-1, claudin-4, and occludin were reduced to ~0.4 ± 0.15 fold, 0.6 ± 0.1 fold, and 0.2 ± 0.16 fold respectively as compared to untransfected cells (normalized to 1) while no significant reduction was seen for ZO-1 (Fig. 4A,B). This depletion was specific for TJ proteins as EspF or Map expression had no effect on the levels of the adherens junction protein E-cadherin or on β-actin which had expression levels comparable to untransfected cells (Fig. 4A,C). In order to determine if this depletion occurred at the TJ complex, we labeled the cell surface proteins with membrane impermeable Sulfo-NHS-Biotin and isolated the biotin-tagged proteins using immobilized streptavidin-agarose resin. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and E-cadherin was used as a cell surface loading control as E-cadherin levels are not affected by either EspF or Map. As shown in Fig. 4, there was a significant reduction in the levels of biotin-labeled TJ proteins in cells expressing EspF and Map. The levels of biotin-labeled claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1 were found to be reduced to ~0.2, ~0.6, ~0.5 and ~0.3 fold in EspF expressing cells and ~0.3, ~0.5, ~0.5 and ~0.4 fold in Map expressing cells respectively (Fig. 4D,E). In cells expressing either EGFP or EGFP-Tir the levels of biotin-labeled TJ proteins were similar to untransfected cells (Fig. 4D,E). These data indicate that EspF and Map not only deplete the total levels of claudin-1, -4 and occludin but also inhibit their junctional recruitment leading to their depletion at the plasma membrane. Biotin labeling also revealed that although there was no decrease observed in the total levels of ZO-1 in EspF and Map cell lines (Fig. 4A,B), biotin-labeled ZO-1 levels were reduced at the plasma membrane.

EspF and Map regulate the expression of tight junction proteins through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms

We next examined if the depletion in TJ proteins was regulated at the transcription or translation level. To determine if the depletion in protein levels was due to a down-regulation in the expression of the genes encoding these proteins, we performed quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) assays using primer/probes for claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1. The fold changes in the expression levels of the genes encoding these TJ proteins in EspF and Map cells, relative to those in cells constitutively expressing EGFP vector alone, were calculated by the ΔΔC_T method⁵¹. This method determines the relative gene expression in the target and reference samples by measuring fluorescence levels at a threshold cycle (C_T). We used GAPDH as an endogenous control in qPCR reactions. In Map cell lines, we observed a decrease in the expression of claudin-1 to ~0.36 fold, while no significant change was observed in the gene expression profiles of claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1 as compared to EGFP cells (Fig. 5A). In EspF cell lines, the relative fold changes in the gene expression levels of claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1 were found to be ~0.03, ~0.92, ~0.45, and ~0.58 fold respectively (Fig. 5A). These data indicated that Map significantly down-regulated the transcription of claudin-1 but had no effect on the transcription of genes encoding other TJ proteins. On the other hand, EspF was found to inhibit the transcription of claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1 significantly while the expression level of claudin-4 was not decreased significantly. Our western blot data (Fig. 4) indicated that EspF did not deplete the levels of ZO-1 but the qPCR data showed a significant decrease in ZO-1 transcripts. These differences may be a reflection of the different half-lives of the corresponding transcripts and proteins. Notably, claudin-1 was the common target for both EspF and Map as both effectors decreased the transcription of claudin-1. We also observed a significant increase in the claudin-1 transcripts in cells expressing Tir (Fig. 5A). It is unclear why Tir expression increases claudin-1 transcripts. An earlier study, in which HA-tagged Tir was over-expressed in MDCK cells during infection, reported that over-expressed Tir tightens the junctions but did not identify the mechanism³⁷. Our qPCR data suggests that one possible mechanism might be the up-regulation of claudin-1 transcripts. As Tir is required for intimate attachment of EPEC to the host cells during infection, we speculate that this might be a mechanism to transiently stabilize the TJs until EPEC is firmly adhered to the host cell and all effectors have been translocated. However, confirmation of this hypothesis will require additional work.

As mentioned above, TJs are dynamic structures where TJ proteins undergo continuous endocytosis and are replaced with new proteins⁴⁷. As the qPCR data suggested that transcriptional repression did not occur for claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1 in Map expressing cells and to some extent on claudin-4 in EspF expressing cells, we wanted to know why these proteins were depleted in these cells lines. To examine if EspF and Map expression interfered with the stability of the TJ proteins, all cell lines were treated with cycloheximide (25 µg/ml) to inhibit protein synthesis for 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours and total cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting (Fig. 5B,C). The EGFP-Tir cell lines did not show significant differences in the stability of claudin-1, -4, occludin and ZO-1 from untransfected cells (Fig. 5B,C). However, the stability of these proteins was found to decline in EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map expressing cells. About 50% depletion was observed in the amount of claudin-1, claudin-4 and occludin within 6 hours in EspF and Map cell lines as compared to 9 to 12 hours in untransfected or Tir cell lines while no significant difference was observed in the stability of ZO-1 (Fig. 5B,C). The TJ barrier is regulated by rapid endocytosis and recycling of the constituent proteins⁵². We therefore tested whether the lysosomal and/or proteasomal degradation pathways were being activated by EspF and Map. Addition of the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 did not increase the levels of the TJ proteins in either the Map or EspF expressing cell lines (data not shown). However, incubation of these cells lines with the lysosomal inhibitor, chloroquine, was found to increase the total levels of claudin-4 and occludin (Fig. 5D). The increase in the levels of ZO-1 was comparable to that seen in untransfected cells. Notably, no increase was observed in the levels of claudin-1 in both the EspF and Map cell lines. This is consistent with the qPCR data as claudin-1 is depleted at the transcription level in both cell lines. Although chloroquine treatment of EspF cell lines caused an increase in the total levels of claudin-4 and occludin, this increase was more pronounced in Map cell lines. This data further suggested that EspF-mediated depletion of TJ proteins occurred at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels while Map caused the depletion of the TJ proteins (except for claudin-1) by targeting them for lysosomal degradation (Fig. 5D).

EspF and Map interact with distinct tight junction-associated proteins

We next examined whether EspF and Map interacted with TJ proteins to prevent their junctional recruitment. Co-immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down assays did not reveal any interaction of EspF and Map with occludin, claudin-1 or claudin-4, the major TJ proteins responsible for the regulation of permeability (data not shown). We then looked for interactions with other tight junction-based proteins that have been reported to indirectly regulate permeability. In co-immunoprecipitation assays performed using anti-GFP antibody, Map was found to interact with all the isoforms of non-muscle myosin II (Fig. 6B). Consistent with earlier published reports, EspF was found to interact with ZO-1 (Fig. 6A). No interaction with these proteins was observed in cell lysates derived from untransfected cells (Fig. 6A,B). Additionally, both EspF and Map were found to interact with actin (Fig. 6A,B). Actin plays a central role in regulating TJ permeability through interactions with ZO-1 and the motor protein non-muscle myosin II^8,53. Thus it is likely that EspF disrupts TJs through ZO-1 mediated contractility of the actin cytoskeleton while Map exerts it effect through direct modulation of the actinomyosin complex.

Tight junction disruption by EspF and Map is independent of mitochondrial function

EspF and Map are targeted to the mitochondria and cause mitochondrial dysfunction^11,27,29. To exclude the possibility that EspF and Map-associated defects on TJ proteins were due to mitochondria-associated cytotoxity and apoptosis, we checked for the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria in cells expressing EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map (Fig. 7). The cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions of cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting. GAPDH and COX IV were used as markers for the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions respectively. We did not detect cytochrome c in the cytosolic fractions indicating that the EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map proteins did not disrupt the mitochondrial membrane (Fig. 7A). Next, we measured the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) in untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines using the JC-1 cationic dye by flow cytometry (Supplementary Figure S2). Since JC-1 dye changes its fluorescence emission from green to orange with increasing ΔΨ, this method provided a useful assay to quantitatively measure the number of cells which displayed shifts in fluorescence emission in these cell lines. We did not find significant differences in the emission shifts in any cell line (Supplementary Figure S2, A–E). One possible reason for EspF and Map cell lines having ΔΨ comparable to untransfected, EGFP and Tir cell lines could be that the genes encoding EspF and Map were tagged at the N-terminus with EGFP which interferes with the mitochondrial localization of these tagged proteins. This was further confirmed by cytotoxicity assays performed to measure viable cells by incubating all cell lines with MTT (Methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide). The number of viable cells was counted for each cell line and fold changes were calculated with respect to untransfected cells (normalized to 1). EspF and Map cell lines exhibited similar numbers of viable cells as untransfected, EGFP and Tir cell lines (Supplementary Figure S2F).

We also did not detect any change in the morphology of the mitochondria in cells expressing EspF and Map nor was there any increase in the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the medium in cell lines expressing EspF and Map (Fig. 7B,C). Finally, we wanted to exclude the possibility that non-cytotoxic variants of these effectors had been selected during the generation of stable cell lines. We checked all cell lines for sensitivity to cisplatin (cis-Diammineplatinum (II) dichloride), a potent cytotoxic drug. We selected cisplatin because MDCK cells are derived from the kidney and cisplatin has been reported to cause nephrotoxicity in cancer patients as well as in cultured LLC-PK1 cells (derived from the proximal tubule of kidney) where it has been reported to induce apoptosis⁵⁴. Confluent cultures of untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines were treated with 50 µM cisplatin for 24 hours and cell viability was measured by MTT assay as described above. The numbers of viable cells were calculated with respect to untreated cells for all cell lines (normalized to 1) and fold change was plotted (Fig. 7D). Although the cell viability was found to decrease in all cell lines, cells expressing EspF or Map exhibited lower viability when treated with 50 µM cisplatin as compared to untransfected, EGFP or Tir cell lines. These data indicated that the expression of EspF and Map increased the sensitivity of these cell lines to cisplatin and also confirmed that these cell lines were not non-cytotoxic variants. These experiments conclusively showed that the depletion of TJ proteins and the concomitant decrease in TER and increase in paracellular flux observed in cells expressing EspF or Map was neither caused by mitochondrial dysfunction nor by loss of cell viability and that both EspF and Map are independently capable of TJ disruption.

Discussion

EspF and Map have been implicated in causing diarrhea through TJ barrier defects but the precise roles of these effectors on TJ function have not been defined. EPEC infection results in an increase in intestinal permeability and a decrease in the absorption of ions/solutes in the host cells. Earlier studies have shown that multiple functions are disrupted in the host cells by cooperative actions of EPEC effector proteins leading to the rapid onset of diarrhea⁵⁵. For example, EspF cooperates with Map, the bacterial surface protein intimin and its receptor Tir to inactivate SGLT-1²⁵ and also inhibits the functions of NHE3³¹. Map inhibits NHERF-1 and cooperates with NleA to inhibit NHERF-2 leading to reduced absorption of sodium ions^32,33. Additionally, EspG1/G2 dependent down-regulation of the Cl^-/HCO3^- exchanger DRA (down-regulated in adenoma) results in reduced absorption of Cl^- in the intestine⁵⁶. TJ disruption is mediated by EPEC effectors EspG1/G2, NleA, EspF and Map. While EspG1/G2 cause a microtubule-dependent disruption of TJs¹², NleA has been reported to dissociate the TJ proteins occludin and ZO-1 and inhibit transport from the Endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi thus blocking the delivery of these proteins^13,57. The effects of Map and EspF on TJs are less clear. As discussed above, some studies have shown that EspF plays a greater role in TJ barrier disruption²⁶, other studies have suggested that Map might be more important¹¹ while some other studies have shown that cooperative actions of EspF and Map are essential for causing diarrhea^11,25. Most of these studies were performed using infections of cultured intestinal epithelial cells with the human EPEC strain E2348/69^11,25 or infections of mice with the mouse strain C. rodentium²⁶. As EPEC translocates more than 20 effectors into the host cell, one limitation in such models is that the individual functions of a given effector can be masked by the presence of other effectors. For example, in the study conducted by Guttman et al.²⁶, mutant versions of C. rodentium which lacked EspF, did not cause TJ disruption even though Map was present in the infected cells leading the authors to conclude that the junction barrier defects were regulated by EspF and not Map. Other studies, utilizing in vitro models of EPEC infection conclusively showed that Map is capable of TJ disruption independently¹¹. This was further confirmed in an in vivo model utilizing mice infected with C. rodentium²⁴. Therefore, to examine the individual contributions of EspF and Map in TJ disruption we developed in vitro models where these effectors were N-terminally tagged with EGFP and constitutively expressed in MDCK epithelial cells in the absence of all other EPEC effectors. We used cells constitutively expressing EGFP-tagged Tir as controls because Tir has been reported to cooperate with EspF and Map in the onset of diarrhea through the disruption of SGLT-1²⁵. We first established the relevance of our EspF and Map in vitro models by measuring the permeability of charged and uncharged molecules. Confluent cultures of cell lines expressing EGFP-tagged EspF and EGFP-tagged Map were found to be defective in the passage of both charged ions as well as uncharged tracers. Specifically, the permeability of ions, as measured by TER, was reduced to 0.38 fold and 0.65 fold in EspF and Map cell lines respectively as compared to control cell lines. Further, EspF increased the paracellular flux of small (4 kDa) and large (70 kDa) dextran tracers by ~2.57 fold and ~1.97 fold respectively. Map was found to increase the flux of only the 4 kDa tracer by ~1.55 fold. The constitutive expression of EspF and Map also caused reorganization of the TJ proteins. These data are in agreement with earlier reported studies on EspF and Map conducted using in vitro and in vivo models^{11,12,13,22,23,24} indicating that our in vitro MDCK models are comparable to the earlier described models and can be used to understand the process of TJ disruption by EspF and Map in greater detail.

In order to delineate the underlying mechanisms of TJ disruption, we examined de novo junction assembly utilizing the calcium switch method where cells are first cultured in low calcium medium to disrupt existing junctions and then switched to normal calcium medium to initiate synchronized junction assembly. The constitutive expression of EspF decreased TER to ~48% and 49% (from 100% in WT cells) in the two EspF cell lines during de novo junction assembly and increased the flux of the 4 kDa and 70 kDa dextran tracers by ~3.6 fold and ~2.7 fold respectively. Constitutive expression of Map decreased TER to ~46% and ~48% in the two Map cell lines and the junction permeability increased by ~1.4 fold for 4 kDa dextran and had no effect on the permeability of the 70 kDa tracer. Immunofluorescence studies indicated that EspF and Map expression caused the majority of TJ proteins to accumulate in the cytoplasm. Our data indicates that EspF and Map interfere with junction assembly by preventing the recruitment of these proteins to the junctional complex. Since claudins regulate the passage of charged molecules through the TJ^4,5, a decrease in TER reflects the loss of claudins at the junctional complex. On the other hand, the passage of non-charged tracers through TJs is regulated by occludin^4,5. Therefore, it seems likely that while both Map and EspF cause an increase in ion permeability, EspF plays a greater role, as compared to Map, in the increased permeability of non-charged molecules and water during EPEC infections.

We also observed that expression of EspF and Map caused the depletion of TJ proteins as seen by reduced levels of TJ proteins in lysates derived from EspF or Map cell lines. Both effectors were found to deplete claudin-1, claudin-4 and occludin but the depletion of ZO-1 was not observed either in EspF or Map cell lines. In order to establish whether this depletion occurred at the TJ complex, we labeled the cell surface proteins with biotin and separated the labeled membrane proteins by binding with immobilized streptavidin resin. These experiments revealed that claudin-1, -4, occludin as well as ZO-1 was depleted in the membrane fractions. It is unlikely that the depletion of TJ proteins by EspF and Map reflects a general down-regulation of proteins in host cells as neither β-actin nor E-cadherin (a protein associated with adherens junctions) was found to be down-regulated in our study.

At the transcription level, both effectors decreased the expression of claudin-1 although this effect was more pronounced for EspF. Interestingly, Map did not inhibit the transcription of claudin-4, occludin and ZO-1. On the other hand, EspF significantly interfered with the transcription of occludin and ZO-1 and to a lesser extent of claudin-4. To analyze the fate of the existing TJ proteins in EspF and Map cell lines, we first blocked protein synthesis by cycloheximide treatment and then assessed the total levels of these proteins. EspF and Map were found to affect protein stability as seen by a 50% decline in the total levels of the TJ proteins within 3 to 6 hours of cycloheximide treatment as opposed to 9 to 12 hours in control cell lines. Additionally, inhibition of lysosomal degradation was found to increase the levels of claudin-4 and occludin in the Map cell lines and to a lesser extent in the EspF cell lines. Lysosomal inhibition had no effect on the levels of claudin-1 in either the EspF cell lines or the Map cell lines suggesting the claudin-1 was regulated at the transcriptional level by both EspF and Map. This data indicated that EspF-mediated depletion of claudin-4 and occludin was regulated at both the transcription and translation level while Map expression caused the depletion of claudin-4 and occludin by lysosomal degradation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the involvement of Map in the lysosomal degradation of TJ proteins. A recent study has revealed that EspF causes the depletion of DNA mismatch repair proteins through post-transcriptional mechanisms implicating EspF in the promotion of colorectal carcinogenesis⁵⁸. Our data provides additional support for a role of EspF in modulating gene expression.

In co-immunoprecipitation assays, we identified that EspF interacted with ZO-1 and actin. It has been reported that EspF, derived from rabbit EPEC, causes the accumulation of TJ proteins ZO-1 and ZO-2 in actin pedestals in infected cells and was also found in the co-immunoprecipitation complex with these proteins during the infection of cells with rabbit EPEC⁴². More recently, a study on the Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) - host interactome, identified ZO-1 as a binding partner for EHEC-derived EspF in yeast two hybrid screens⁵⁹. Our findings confirm this interaction as we also found that EspF from the human EPEC strain E2348/69 interacts with ZO-1. Whether this interaction is direct or indirect remains to be determined and requires further work. ZO-1 contains an actin-binding domain within its C-terminus and its interaction with actin has been reported to play an important role in stabilizing the TJ solute barrier⁸. We speculate that EspF may interfere with the interaction between ZO-1 and actin to destabilize the TJ barrier. Whether EspF, ZO-1 and actin are part of the same complex or whether EspF forms separate complexes with ZO-1 and actin and the functional consequence of these interactions requires further investigation. Additionally, we report, for the first time, that Map interacts with non-muscle myosin II heavy chain isoforms A, B and C. Map was also found to form a complex with actin which is consistent with data reported in earlier studies⁴³. TJ assembly is regulated by the differential modulation of the actin cytoskeleton and the motor protein myosin⁵³. Cytoskeletal reorganization and acto-myosin contractility directly affects the junctional barrier through myosin II activation and several TJ proteins have been reported to regulate this signaling pathway through the modulation of Rho GTPases^4,7. Interestingly, Map has been reported to activate Cdc42, a member of the Rho GTPase family, by acting as an exchange factor for Cdc42 leading to the formation of transient filopodia^28,60. The C-terminus of Map interacts with the PDZ domain of Ebp50 (ezrin binding protein 50) and this interaction subsequently causes the activation of Cdc42 at the bacterial docking site⁴³. The Map-Ebp50 interaction acts as a scaffold linking Map with actin and causing localised actin polymerization⁴³. Cdcc42 has been reported to regulate TJ assembly and the transport of membrane proteins in MDCK cells⁶¹. Earlier studies have revealed that EPEC induced phosphorylation of the 20-kilodalton myosin light chain (MLC20) is responsible for the perturbation of the intestinal barrier⁶². However, the effector protein(s) responsible were not identified in this study. Since, the phosphorylation of MLC and the subsequent actinomyosin contractility regulates the TJ barrier^4,7,53, it is tempting to speculate that Map modulates this pathway to disrupt TJs. Whether the interaction of Map with non-muscle myosin II isoforms is linked to the complex it forms with ebp50 and whether Map targets this pathway to disrupt TJs through the regulation of Cdc42 remains to be investigated.

Conclusions

Frequent bouts of diarrhea caused by EPEC infections are associated with severe morbidity and mortality in young children especially in developing countries. EPEC infection causes an acute loss of water and electrolytes in patients due to increased permeability through TJs leading to dehydration and death. Currently, the therapies used for treatment rely on the administration of antibiotics to eliminate the bacteria and oral rehydration solutions to restore the electrolyte balance. However, these therapies are ineffective in blocking the leakage through TJs. In this report, we have used a simple bacteria-free model to demonstrate that the EPEC effectors EspF and Map can independently disrupt TJs. This model can serve as a tool for designing effective strategies to close the TJ barrier in EPEC infections. Using this model, we report here that EspF and Map use a multi-pronged strategy to disrupt TJs during EPEC infections by (i) preventing the junctional recruitment of TJ proteins by accumulating them in the cytoplasm, (ii) depleting the junctional proteins through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms and (iii) interacting with ZO-1 (EspF) and myosin II (Map) to regulate the assembly and disassembly of tight junctions ultimately compromising barrier integrity. Our data also conclusively shows that TJ barrier disruption by EspF and Map does not require the actions of the bacterial surface protein Intimin or its receptor Tir nor is it linked to mitochondrial dysfunction caused by EspF and Map. In conclusion, our data indicates that independent actions of EspF and Map are capable of promoting permeability through TJs. Further, the interactions between EspF-ZO-1 and Map-myosin II as well as the differential regulation of transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms suggest that these effectors have non-overlapping functions and may target distinct signaling pathways to cause maximum disruption to the TJ barrier. A recently published study, which revealed that EspF, but not Map, promotes the endocytosis of Crb3 (Crumbs) disrupting cell polarity⁴⁰, provides further support to our hypothesis that Map and EspF have distinct functions in infected epithelial cells.

Methods

Plasmids

The genes encoding EspF and Tir were amplified from the genomic DNA of EPEC O127:H6 strain E2348/69 by PCR using the following primers:

EspF Forward: 5′-AAAAATCTAGAGTCGACCCCTTTCTTCGATTGCTCATAGG-3′
EspF Reverse: 5′-AAAAAGGATCCCTTAAGATGGTTAATGGAATTAGTAACGCTG-3′
Tir Forward: 5′-AAAAATCTAGAGTCGACAACGAAACGTACTGGTCCCGG-3′
Tir Reverse: 5′-AAAAAGGATCCCTTAAGATGGCTATTGGTAACCTTGGT-3′

The resulting PCR products were digested with BamHI and SalI and inserted into the compatible ends of the pEGFP-C1 vector between the BglII and SalI sites to generate an N-terminal EGFP-tagged EspF or N-terminal EGFP-tagged Tir construct for expression in MDCK cells. The same PCR product was inserted into the pGEX-4T-3 vector between the BamHI and SalI sites to generate N-terminal GST-tagged EspF and Tir constructs for use in pull-down assays. The EGFP- and GST-tagged Map constructs were made as described earlier⁴¹.

Cell culture

MDCK II cells were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) and 1X penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B solution (HiMedia Laboratories). T84 cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 × penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B solution. MDCK cell lines with stable integration of pEGFP-EspF, pEGFP-Tir and pEGFP-C1 vector alone were generated by us using the calcium phosphate protocol described earlier for the generation of stable cell lines of pEGFP-Map⁴¹. Cell lines expressing EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map were selected and maintained in medium containing G418 (used at a final concentration of 500 µg/ml). All cell lines were maintained in a humidified CO₂ incubator at 5% CO₂ at 37 °C. Two independent clones were used for each cell line in all experiments.

Transepithelial resistance and dextran permeability

The cells were trypsinized and 1 × 10⁵ cells were seeded on 12-mm polycarbonate Transwell filters with a pore size of 0.4 µm (Corning) in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1X penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B solution and G418 (for EGFP, Tir, EspF, and Map cell lines) and allowed to grow until confluent with medium changes every alternate day. Transepithelial resistance was measured daily using a voltohmmeter (Millicell ERS; EMD Millipore Corporation). All cell lines attained maximum TER values on the 7th day of plating on filters. To obtain the final TER values (Ωxcm²), the resistance of the blank filter was subtracted from the resistance of the filters containing cell lines and multiplied with the surface area of the 12-mm filters (1.12 cm²). Once the cultures displayed maximum TER values, the permeability of uncharged tracers across cell monolayers was measured by adding 1 mg/ml of 4 kDa FITC-Dextran and 70 kDa Rhodamine B-Dextran (Sigma-Aldrich) to the upper chamber. After 5 hours incubation at 37 °C, aliquots of 100 µl were removed from the lower chamber and fluorescence was measured using a Fluorometer (λ excitation 490 nm and λ emission 520 nm for 4 kDa FITC-Dextran; λ excitation 570 nm and λ emission 595 nm for 70 kDa Rhodamine B-Dextran). Each 12 well plate (containing Transwell filters) included untransfected cells as controls and fold changes in TER or flux for EspF and Map cell lines were calculated with respect to untransfected cells grown on the same plate(s).

Calcium switch Assays

For de novo junction assembly, confluent cultures of untransfected, EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF or EGFP-Map cells were trypsinized and resuspended in low calcium (<5 µM) medium (S-MEM supplemented with 10% dialyzed FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2mM L-glutamine and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (for untransfected cells) and 500 μg/ml G418 for (EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map cells) and plated at a density of 2 × 10⁶ cells/ml on permeable 12-mm Transwell filters with a pore size of 0.4 μm (Corning). After 18–20 hours, the cells were incubated in normal calcium (1.8 mM) medium. TER measurements were started 30 minutes later and then recorded hourly until junction assembly was complete using a voltohmmeter (Millicell ERS; EMD Millipore Corporation). TER was calculated by subtracting the resistance of the blank filters from the resistance values of filters containing cell lines. After 24 hours, the permeability of 4 kDa FITC-Dextran and 70 kDa Rhodamine B-Dextran (Sigma-Aldrich) was measured as described above. Each 12 well plate (containing Transwell filters) included untransfected cells as controls and TER or flux values were calculated with respect to untransfected cells grown on the same plate(s).

Immunofluorescence assays

Untransfected, EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map cells were cultured on glass cover-slips until confluent and fixed with chilled methanol for 5 minutes at −20 °C, rehydrated with PBS for 5 minutes at room temperature and blocked with PBS containing 0.5% BSA at room temperature for 30 minutes. Cover slips were incubated with primary antibodies against TJ proteins for 2 to 4 hours. Primary antibodies, used at 1:300 dilution, were: claudin-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #374900, mouse monoclonal), claudin-4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #329400, mouse monoclonal), occludin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #331500, mouse monoclonal) and ZO-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #339100, mouse monoclonal). After washing three times with blocking solution, the cover slips were incubated with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Millipore) for 1 hour at room temperature. Cover-slips were mounted in ProLong Diamond Antifade mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #P36961). Images were acquired at 63X magnification on a Zeiss ApoTome (Axiovert 40 CFL).

Preparation of total protein lysates

Total protein lysates were prepared from confluent cultures of untransfected, EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map cells grown either on 6-well plates or on Transwell filters (Corning). Cell lysates were prepared by adding 1X Laemelli buffer to the cells and passing the mixture through a 23-gauge needle several times. The lysates were electrophoresed on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting was performed using above listed monoclonal antibodies against TJ proteins at 1:1000 dilution. The results obtained after probing with monoclonal antibodies were also confirmed by using polyclonal antibodies. The antibodies used were claudin-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #717800, rabbit polyclonal), Occludin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #711500, rabbit polyclonal), ZO-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #617300, rabbit polyclonal), pan-cadherin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #717100, rabbit polyclonal), actin (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700S, mouse monoclonal; and #A2066, rabbit polyclonal, Sigma-Aldrich) and GFP (#2955, mouse monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology and #G1544, rabbit polyclonal, Sigma-Aldrich). Rabbit anti-GAPDH antibody (1:10,000 dilution; BioBharti, #BB-AB0060) was used as a loading control to ensure equal loading of cell lysates on gels. The x-ray films were scanned and band intensities were quantitated using ImageJ software. For the inhibition of protein synthesis, confluent cells, cultured in 6 well plates, were incubated in the absence (−) or presence (+) of cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 25 μg/ml for 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours prior to cell lysis. Subsequently, the cell lysates were made by adding 1X Laemelli buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described above. For the inhibition of lysosomal and proteasomal degradation, confluent cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 100 µM chloroquine or 10 µM MG132 respectively for 18 hours. Cell lysates were made by adding 1X Laemelli buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Biotinylation Assays

The HOOK Cell Surface Protein Isolation kit (G‐Biosciences) was used to label cell surface proteins with Sulfo‐NHS‐SS‐Biotin, a water‐soluble biotinylation reagent that has an N‐hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo‐NHS) ester. Briefly, untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines were cultured in 100-mm plates until 90–95% confluent, washed twice with ice cold PBS and treated with 3 ml per plate of biotin solution (2 mg/ml biotin reagent in PBS) for 30 minutes at 4 °C with shaking. The cells were washed twice with cold 100 mM Glycine (in PBS) for 5 minutes with gentle rocking, twice with cold 20 mM Glycine (in PBS) for 5 minutes and twice in cold PBS for 5 minutes. The cells were then lysed in 200 μl of lysis buffer (containing 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100 and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysates were passed through a 22-gauge needle five times and rotated at 4 °C for 30 minutes followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 minutes. After removing 100 µl as input, the supernatant was incubated with 50 µL of streptavidin-agarose beads overnight at 4 °C. The samples were then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 seconds at 4 °C and the supernatant was discarded. The beads were washed once with lysis buffer, twice with buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (in PBS, pH 7.4), 350 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA and twice with PBS. Samples were analysed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting using the antibodies described above. Fold changes were calculated by densitometric scanning of films using ImageJ software.

Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Cells expressing EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map were grown in 100-mm plates until confluent. Total RNA was isolated using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Ambion). cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR assays were performed using the TaqMan Gene Expression Cells-to-C_T Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RT-PCR reaction was carried out at 37 °C for 60 minutes and 95 °C for 5 minutes in a 50 μL volume using 1 µg of total RNA. Negative controls without the 20X RT Enzyme mix were kept for all samples. For qPCR, 2 μL of cDNA from each sample was used in a 10 μL reaction volume containing 5 μL of 2X TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix and 0.5 μL of 20X TaqMan Gene expression assay. The cycling conditions used were: 50 °C for 2 minutes; 95 °C for 10 minutes; and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 1 minute. All reactions were set up in triplicate for the target genes and the endogenous control gene. TaqMan gene expressions assays for claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin, ZO-1, and the endogenous control gene GAPDH were purchased from Life Technologies Ltd. (Assay Id: Cf02713195_u1, Cf02695489_s1, Cf02624085_m1, Cf02628478_m1 and Cf04419463_gH respectively). The test and the calibrator samples were normalized with their endogenous controls and relative quantitation of gene expression was determined by calculating the fold difference between EGFP cells and EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF or EGFP-Map cells by applying the ΔΔC_T method⁵¹.

Co-Immunoprecipitation assays

Confluent monolayers of untransfected, EGFP-EspF or EGFP-Map cells, grown in a 100-mm plate, were washed with cold PBS and suspended in RIPA buffer (1% Empigen BB, 1% triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM PMSF and 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail). After extraction by passing through a 21-gauge needle several times, the mixture was clarified by centrifugation and the supernatant was incubated with 2 µg of GFP antibody (#G1544, Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4 °C to precipitate the protein-antibody complex. Approximately 50 µl of Protein G-Agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the lysates and mixed for 4 hrs at 4 °C for immobilization of protein-antibody complex on the beads. The beads were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 seconds and the supernatant was discarded. The beads were washed twice with RIPA buffer and once with PBS, boiled for 5 minutes and subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis. Blots were probed with antibodies against Myosin IIA (#3403, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), Myosin IIB (#3404, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), Myosin IIC (#8189, rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), GFP (#2955, mouse monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), actin (#3700, mouse monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology) and ZO-1 (#339100, mouse monoclonal, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 1:1000 dilution.

Mitochondrial Assays

The mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions of cells were obtained by incubating confluent cells derived from untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines in buffer containing 200 µg/ml digitonin, 80 mM KCl (in PBS) on ice for 5 minutes. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 minutes and the supernatant (cytosolic fraction) was collected. The pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM Na₂EDTA, 0.2% (w/v) Triton X-100, 0.2% IGEPAL CA-630 and 1 × protease inhibitors) and incubated for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes to collect the mitochondrial fraction. Equal amounts of cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blotting with antibodies against cytochrome c (#11940, rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), Cox IV (#11967, mouse monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology) and GAPDH (#BB-AB0060, rabbit polyclonal, BioBharti). Cox IV and GAPDH were used as loading controls for the mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions respectively. Mitochondrial membrane potential was analyzed by using the JC-1 dye (5,5′,6,6′-Tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolocarbocyanine iodide; Sigma-Aldrich; #T4069) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, ≥ 2 × 10⁵ cells were harvested and the total volume was adjusted to 1 ml with pre-warmed (37 °C) complete cell culture medium. JC-1 was added at a final concentration of 2.5 μg/ml while vortexing until the dye was dissolved and a uniform red-violet colour was obtained. Subsequently, the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 10 minutes in the dark. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500 × g at room temperature and analysed by flow cytometry. A minimum of 10,000 cells for each sample were analyzed by BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer. The emission wavelengths of JC-1 monomers and ‘J-aggregates’ were 525 nm (Fl1 channel) and 585 nm (Fl2 channel).

Cytotoxicity Assays

Untransfected, EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map cells were grown in 96 well plates (approximately 1 × 10⁴ cells per well) in triplicate until confluent. MTT (Methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide, #M2128, Sigma-Aldrich) was added at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and the plate was incubated in the dark for 3 hours. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS, the residue was dissolved in DMSO for 5 minutes and absorbance was measured at 595 nm. For LDH measurements, we used the CytoScan‐Fluoro Assay kit (G-Biosciences). Approximately, 1 × 10⁴ cells from each cell line were cultured in triplicate wells of a 96-well plate for 24 hours. The plates were removed from the 37 °C incubator and equilibrated to 22 °C for about 20‐30 minutes following which 100 µl of CytoScan‐Fluoro Reaction Buffer was added to 100 µl medium containing cells and incubated at 22 °C for 10 minutes. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μl of CytoScan‐Fluoro‐Stop Solution to each well and the plate was shaken for 10‐15 seconds. Fluorescence was measured with an excitation wavelength of 560 nm and an emission wavelength of 590 nm. For positive controls, cells grown in triplicate wells were lysed in 2 μl of CytoScan‐Fluoro‐Lysis Buffer per 100 μl original volume to generate maximum LDH Release Controls. The fluorescence of the culture medium was subtracted from the values obtained in experimental samples and positive controls and expressed as fold change with respect to the values obtained for EGFP cell lines (normalized to 1). Cell viability was determined similarly by culturing all cell lines (approximately 1 × 10⁴ cells) in triplicate wells of a 96 well plate in the absence or presence of cisplatin (#P4394, Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 50 µM for 24 hours. The number of viable cells, after cisplatin treatment, was estimated by MTT assay as described above.

Transient Transfection and Transduction

T84 cells were grown on glass cover-slips in 24 well plates until 80% confluent and transfected with pEGFP-C1 vector, pEGFP-Tir, pEGFP-EspF and pEGFP-Map plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, # 11668027) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 500 ng of each plasmid construct was mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent in 1:1 ratio and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the mixture was added to the cells and incubated overnight in a CO₂ incubator. The cells were processed for immunofluorescence and probed with antibodies against TJ proteins as described above. For examining the morphology of the mitochondria, we used the CellLight Mitochondria-RFP, BacMam 2.0 construct (#C10601, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to label mitochondria with red fluorescent protein (RFP) in live cells. This fusion construct contains the leader sequence of E1 alpha pyruvate dehydrogenase and RFP-tag packaged in the baculovirus. Cells from untransfected, EGFP, Tir, EspF and Map cell lines were transduced with 2 μL of BacMam 2.0 reagent (per 10,000 cells in media), incubated for 16 hours at 37 °C and images were acquired at 63 × magnification on a Zeiss ApoTome (Axiovert 40 CFL).

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times with two independent clones (biological replicates) for EGFP, EGFP-Tir, EGFP-EspF and EGFP-Map. Comparisons between groups were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Holm-Bonferroni corrected t-tests. Differences between groups were considered significant at p-values < 0.05.

References

Ochoa, T. J. & Contreras, C. A. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection in children. Curr Opin Infect Dis 24, 478–483 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nataro, J. P. & Kaper, J. B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 11, 142–201 (1998).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dean, P. & Kenny, B. The effector repertoire of enteropathogenic E. coli: ganging up on the host cell. Curr Opin Microbiol 12, 101–109 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zihni, C., Mills, C., Matter, K. & Balda, M. S. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17, 564–580 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krug, S. M., Schulzke, J. D. & Fromm, M. Tight junction, selective permeability, and related diseases. Semin Cell Dev Biol 36, 166–176 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aijaz, S., Balda, M. S. & Matter, K. Tight junctions: molecular architecture and function. Int Rev Cytol 248, 261–298 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Quiros, M. & Nusrat, A. RhoGTPases, actomyosin signaling and regulation of the epithelial Apical Junctional Complex. Semin Cell Dev Biol 36, 194–203 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van Itallie, C. M., Fanning, A. S., Bridges, A. & Anderson, J. M. ZO-1 Stabilizes the Tight Junction Solute Barrier through Coupling to the Perijunctional Cytoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell 20, 3930–3940 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sousa, S., Lecuit, M. & Cossart, P. Microbial strategies to target, cross or disrupt epithelia. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17, 489–498 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zihni, C., Balda, M. S. & Matter, K. Signalling at tight junctions during epithelial differentiation and microbial pathogenesis. J Cell Sci 127, 3401–3413 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dean, P. & Kenny, B. Intestinal barrier dysfunction by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is mediated by two effector molecules and a bacterial surface protein. Mol Microbiol 54, 665–675 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Glotfelty, L. G. et al. Enteropathogenic E. coli effectors EspG1/G2 disrupt microtubules, contribute to tight junction perturbation and inhibit restoration. Cell Microbiol 16, 1767–1783 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thanabalasuriar, A. et al. The bacterial virulence factor NleA is required for the disruption of intestinal tight junctions by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol 12, 31–41 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Law, R. J., Gur-Arie, L., Rosenshine, I. & Finlay, B. B. In vitro and in vivo model systems for studying enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 3, a009977 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vallance, B. A., Deng, W., Jacobson, K. & Finlay, B. B. Host susceptibility to the attaching and effacing bacterial pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. Infect Immun 71, 3443–3453 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Savkovic, S. D., Villanueva, J., Turner, J. R., Matkowskyj, K. A. & Hecht, G. Mouse model of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Infect Immun 73, 1161–1170 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli changes distribution of occludin and ZO-1 in tight junction membrane microdomains in vivo. Microb Pathog 48, 28–34 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Shifflett, D. E., Clayburgh, D. R., Koutsouris, A., Turner, J. R. & Hecht, G. A. Enteropathogenic E. coli disrupts tight junction barrier function and structure in vivo. Lab Invest 85, 1308–1324 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Collington, G. K., Booth, I. W. & Knutton, S. Rapid modulation of electrolyte transport in Caco-2 cell monolayers by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) infection. Gut 42, 200–207 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Canil, C. et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli decreases the transepithelial electrical resistance of polarized epithelial monolayers. Infect Immun 61, 2755–2762 (1993).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Philpott, D. J., McKay, D. M., Sherman, P. M. & Perdue, M. H. Infection of T84 cells with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli alters barrier and transport functions. Am J Physiol 270, G634–645 (1996).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simonovic, I., Rosenberg, J., Koutsouris, A. & Hecht, G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli dephosphorylates and dissociates occludin from intestinal epithelial tight junctions. Cell Microbiol 2, 305–315 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McNamara, B. P. et al. Translocated EspF protein from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli disrupts host intestinal barrier function. J Clin Invest 107, 621–629 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, C. et al. Citrobacter rodentium infection causes both mitochondrial dysfunction and intestinal epithelial barrier disruption in vivo: role of mitochondrial associated protein (Map). Cell Microbiol 8, 1669–1686 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dean, P., Maresca, M., Schüller, S., Phillips, A. D. & Kenny, B. Potent diarrheagenic mechanism mediated by the cooperative action of three enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-injected effector proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 1876–1881 (2006).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guttman, J. A. et al. Attaching and effacing pathogen-induced tight junction disruption in vivo. Cell Microbiol 8, 634–645 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Holmes, A., Muhlen, S., Roe, A. J. & Dean, P. The EspF effector, a bacterial pathogen’s swiss army knife Infect Immun 78, 4445–4453 (2010).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alto, N. M. et al. Identification of a bacterial type III effector family with G protein mimicry functions. Cell 124, 133–145 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Papatheodorou, P. et al. The enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) Map effector is imported into the mitochondrial matrix by the TOM/Hsp70 system and alters organelle morphology. Cell Microbiol 8, 677–689 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alto, N. M. et al. The type III effector EspF coordinates membrane trafficking by the spatiotemporal activation of two eukaryotic signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 178, 1265–1278 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hodges, K., Alto, N. M., Ramaswamy, K., Dudeja, P. K. & Hecht, G. The enteropathogenic Escherichia coli effector protein EspF decreases sodium hydrogen exchanger 3 activity. Cell Microbiol 10, 1735–1745 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simpson, N. et al. The Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system effector Map binds EBP50/NHERF1: implication for cell signalling and diarrhoea. Mol Microbiol 60, 349–363 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martinez, E. et al. Binding to Na(+) /H(+) exchanger regulatory factor 2 (NHERF2) affects trafficking and function of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III secretion system effectors Map, EspI and NleH. Cell Microbiol 12, 1718–1731 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tobita, K., Sugiura, A., Enomote, C. & Furuyama, M. Plaque assay and primary isolation of influenza A viruses in an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK) in the presence of trypsin. Med Microbiol Immunol 162, 9–14 (1975).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, S. C., Kappes, M. A., Chen, M. C., Lin, C. C. & Wang, T. T. Distinct susceptibility and applicability of MDCK derivatives for influenza virus research. PLoS One 12, e0172299 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hossain, M. J., Perez, S., Guo, Z., Chen, L. M. & Donis, R. O. Establishment and characterization of a Madin-Darby canine kidney reporter cell line for influenza A virus assays. J Clin Microbiol 48, 2515–2523 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sason, H. et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli subverts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate upon epithelial cell infection. Mol Biol Cell 20, 544–555 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jensen, H. H. et al. Tir Is Essential for the Recruitment of Tks5 to Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Pedestals. PLoS One 10, e0141871 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsuzawa, T., Kuwae, A. & Abe, A. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli type III effectors EspG and EspG2 alter epithelial paracellular permeability. Infect Immun 73, 6283–6289 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tapia, R., Kralicek, S. E. & Hecht, G. A. EPEC effector EspF promotes Crumbs3 endocytosis and disrupts epithelial cell polarity. Cell Microbiol 19, e12757 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Singh, A. P. & Aijaz, S. Generation of a MDCK cell line with constitutive expression of the Enteropathogenic E. coli effector protein Map as an in vitro model of pathogenesis. Bioengineered 6, 335–341 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Peralta-Ramirez, J. et al. EspF Interacts with nucleation-promoting factors to recruit junctional proteins into pedestals for pedestal maturation and disruption of paracellular permeability. Infect Immun 76, 3854–3868 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Orchard, R. C. et al. Identification of F-actin as the dynamic hub in a microbial-induced GTPase polarity circuit. Cell 148, 803–815 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krause, G. et al. Structure and function of claudins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778, 631–645 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Inai, T., Kobayashi, J. & Shibata, Y. Claudin-1 contributes to the epithelial barrier function in MDCK cells. Eur J Cell Biol 78, 849–855 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Van Itallie, C., Rahner, C. & Anderson, J. M. Regulated expression of claudin-4 decreases paracellular conductance through a selective decrease in sodium permeability. J Clin Invest 107, 1319–1327 (2001).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shen, L., Weber, C. R. & Turner, J. R. The tight junction protein complex undergoes rapid and continuous molecular remodeling at steady state. J Cell Biol 181, 683–695 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Mariscal, L. et al. Role of calcium in tight junction formation between epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 259, C978–986 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Boulan, E. & Nelson, W. J. Morphogenesis of the polarized epithelial cell phenotype. Science 245, 718–725 (1989).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Chávez de Ramírez, B. & Cereijido, M. Tight junction formation in cultured epithelial cells (MDCK). J Membr Biol 86, 113–125 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ivanov, A. I., Nusrat, A. & Parkos, C. A. Endocytosis of the apical junctional complex: mechanisms and possible roles in regulation of epithelial barriers. Bioessays 27, 356–365 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ivanov, A. I., Hunt, D., Utech, M., Nusrat, A. & Parkos, C. A. Differential roles for actin polymerization and a myosin II motor in assembly of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Mol Biol Cell 16, 2636–2650 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Park, M. S., De Leon, M. & Devarajan, P. Cisplatin induces apoptosis in LLC-PK1 cells via activation of mitochondrial pathways. J Am Soc Nephrol 13, 858–865 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Viswanathan, V. K., Hodges, K. & Hecht, G. Enteric infection meets intestinal function: how bacterial pathogens cause diarrhoea. Nat Rev Microbiol 7, 110–119 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gujral, T. et al. Mechanisms of DRA recycling in intestinal epithelial cells: effect of enteropathogenic E. coli. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 309, C835–C846 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, J. et al. The bacterial virulence factor NleA inhibits cellular protein secretion by disrupting mammalian COPII function. Cell Host Microbe 2, 160–171 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maddocks, O. D. K., Scanlon, K. M. & Donnenberg, M. S. An Escherichia coli Effector Protein Promotes Host Mutation via Depletion of DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins. mBio 4, 00152–13 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Blasche, S. et al. The EHEC-host interactome reveals novel targets for the translocated intimin receptor. Sci Rep. 4, 7531 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Huang, Z. et al. Structural insights into host GTPase isoform selection by a family of bacterial GEF mimics. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16, 853–860 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rojas, R., Ruiz, W. G., Leung, S. M., Jou, T. S. & Apodaca, G. Cdc42-dependent modulation of tight junctions and membrane protein traffic in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell 12, 2257–2274 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuhan, R., Koutsouris, A., Savkovic, S. D. & Hecht, G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-induced myosin light chain phosphorylation alters intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 113, 1873–1882 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.A. would like to thank Ayub Qadri (National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi) for the T84 cells and Rana Pratap Singh and Praveen Kumar Kujur (School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi) for help with the JC-1 assays. S.S., K.P., A.P.S., I.A., A.M. and R.A.S. received research fellowships from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (S.S.), University Grants Commission (K.P., A.P.S., I.A., A.M), and Indian Council of Medical Research, (R.A.S.). This work is supported by grants to S.A. by the Department of Biotechnology (# BT/PR11111/BRB/10/634/2008), Jawaharlal Nehru University (UPE II Grant # 122), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR-CAR grant), Department of Science and Technology (DST-PURSE grant) and University Grants Commission (UGC-SAP/DRS II grant). The funding agencies had no role in the design of this study, data collection and interpretation.

Author information

Anand Prakash Singh, Swati Sharma, Kirti Pagarware, Rafay Anwar Siraji and Imran Ansari contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
Anand Prakash Singh, Swati Sharma, Kirti Pagarware, Rafay Anwar Siraji, Imran Ansari, Anupam Mandal, Pangertoshi Walling & Saima Aijaz

Authors

Anand Prakash Singh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Swati Sharma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kirti Pagarware
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rafay Anwar Siraji
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Imran Ansari
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Anupam Mandal
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pangertoshi Walling
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Saima Aijaz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.A. conceived the project, obtained the funding, performed some experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. A.P.S., S.S., K.P., R.A.S., I.A., A.M. and P.W. performed the experiments. All authors approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saima Aijaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A.P., Sharma, S., Pagarware, K. et al. Enteropathogenic E. coli effectors EspF and Map independently disrupt tight junctions through distinct mechanisms involving transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Sci Rep 8, 3719 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22017-1

Download citation

Received: 15 September 2017
Accepted: 14 February 2018
Published: 27 February 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22017-1

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.