Abstract
Insulin-resistance is the main cause of type 2 diabetes. Here we describe the identification and characterization of BMP2 and BMP6 as new insulin-sensitizing growth factors in mature adipocytes. We show that BMP2 and BMP6 lead to enhanced insulin-mediated glucose uptake in both insulin-sensitive and -insensitive adipocytes. We exclude a direct effect of BMP2 or BMP6 on translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane and demonstrate that these BMPs increase GLUT4 protein levels equipotent to Rosiglitazone. BMPs induce expression of PPARγ as the crucial mediator for the insulin-sensitizing effect. A comprehensive RNA-Seq analysis in mature adipocytes revealed regulation of both BMP/Smad and PPARγ target genes. The effects of BMP2 and BMP6 are not completely redundant and include regulation of genes involved in glucose and fatty acid metabolism and adipokine expression. Collectively, these findings suggest the BMP2 and BMP6 pathway(s) as promising new drug targets to treat insulin resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As the number of people with diabetes has quadrupled since 1980, so has the need for new therapeutic interventions. The major aspect of type 2 diabetes is chronic hyperglycemia due to insulin resistance in muscle, fat, and liver. Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake is mediated by GLUT4, the most important glucose transporter in muscle and adipose tissue. GLUT4 is downregulated in diabetes patients and its expression levels are correlated with whole-body glucose homeostasis1. The antidiabetic drug Rosiglitazone, the strongest known PPARγ agonist, has been withdrawn from the European market since adverse drug reactions like severe cardiovascular events and increased bone fracture rates upon long-term use have been reported2,3. Hence, there is a strong need to identify new insulin-sensitizers and to unravel molecular processes involving PPARγ modulation in adult adipose tissue.
Bone/body morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are secreted growth factors originally discovered by their ability to induce bone and cartilage formation4. There are more than 20 different members of BMPs known with distinct roles in organ development and homeostasis as shown by their individual gene knockout phenotypes. Beside their classical role in development, BMPs regulate several biological processes such as adipogenesis, iron metabolism in the liver, and differentiation and thermoregulatory activity of brown adipose tissue5. BMPs exert their function by binding to hetero-oligomeric complexes comprising of BMP type I (ACVR1A, BMPR1A, and BMPR1B) and type II (BMPR2, ACTR2A, and ACTR2B) receptors. Interestingly, also mechanical forces are integrated and contribute to the BMP signaling network6.
Genetic and evolutionary analyses revealed expression of the BMP type II receptor (BMPR2) gene in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, which suggests a role for BMPR2 in the pathophysiology of human adiposity7. Moreover, expression levels and genetic variants of the BMP type 1A receptor (BMPR1A) gene correlate with obesity in humans8. Conditional ablation of Bmpr1a in aP2 (also known as FABP4) expressing tissues prevents age-related impairment of insulin sensitivity in normal and HFD fed mice. Further, the Adipoq-Bmpr1a-KO strain, in which mature adipocytes are more specifically targeted, recapitulates the observed phenotype in aP2-Bmpr1a-KO mice only partially, suggesting that BMP signaling is very versatile in mature adipocytes9. Interestingly, the distant TGF-β family member growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) induces weight loss through decreased food intake in obese rodents and primates via its recently identified receptor GDNF Family Receptor Alpha Like (GFRAL) which is expressed in the area postrema of the brain10,11,12.
The most extensively studied member of the BMP ligand family is BMP213. BMP2 and its closest relative BMP4 promote white adipogenesis in various precursor cell lines by induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ, whereas BMP7 exclusively promotes brown adipogenesis14,15,16,17. The white-to-brown transition of human preadipocytes is enhanced by BMP4 and BMP718. In the context of brown adipogenesis, a potential cross-talk between insulin and BMP signaling has been proposed19. BMP4, BMP7, and BMP9 are expressed in adipose tissue and act as adipokines regulating glucose homeostasis in several other tissues20,21,22,23. Being the first BMP detected in the blood stream of healthy individuals, BMP6 is best known for its role in iron metabolism24. However, BMP6 has been proposed to induce brown fat differentiation of skeletal muscle precursor cells25. Recently, the expression of BMP2, especially in visceral adipose tissue, was found to positively correlate with BMI and diabetic status in the Leipzig Cohort26. In mature adipocytes, BMP signaling has never been investigated systematically. Moreover, BMP2 and BMP7 are clinically used to promote bone healing in cases of bone fracture nonunions and in spine surgery. Taken together, there is an emerging need to understand the precise role of BMP signaling in adult tissues, particularly in the context of glucose metabolism.
Here we show that both BMP2 and BMP6 act on mature adipocytes as insulin-sensitizers. BMP signaling leads to transcriptional upregulation of the adipocyte master regulator PPARγ, which in turn upregulates GLUT4 and several other genes involved in lipid metabolism as revealed by whole transcriptome analysis.
Results
BMP2 and BMP4 are well known for their function in white adipogenesis and BMP2 was proposed to play an important role in energy storage partitioning and obesity26, while BMP7 is involved in brown adipogenesis14. The role of BMP6, structurally most similar to BMP7, in adipocytes has never been addressed. In addition, the physiological relevance and molecular mode of action of BMPs in adult adipose tissue remain largely elusive. To uncover the role of BMP signaling in mature i.e. terminally differentiated adipocytes and adult glucose metabolism, we conducted a comparative study addressing the impact of BMP2 and BMP6 on signal transduction, gene expression and metabolism.
For this purpose, we used 3T3-L1 cells which were terminally differentiated, stimulated with BMP2 or BMP6 and subjected to various molecular and physiological analyses. To assess the efficiency of 3T3-L1 differentiation, cells were stained for adipocyte-typical lipid droplets with the lipophilic fluorochrome BODIPY 493/503 and analyzed via flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. S1a) and microscopy (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Eight days after induction, differentiation efficiency was >90%.
BMP2 and BMP6 induce P-Smad, P-p38 signaling and upregulate PPARγ
To characterize BMP signaling in adult adipocytes, we performed time-resolved stimulation experiments assessing protein phosphorylation via immunoblotting. BMP2 as well as BMP6 treatment led to Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation after one hour, which persisted at least 24 h (Fig. 1a). Of note, Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation by BMP6 was stronger after 2 h and 4 h of stimulation compared to BMP2. Moreover, BMP2 and BMP6 induced phosphorylation of the MAP kinase p38 (Fig. 1c). As shown previously for BMP2-mediated white adipocyte differentiation in C3H10T1/2 cells, both Smad1 and p38 signaling are responsible for the upregulation of the master regulator PPARγ and its transcriptional activity27. Beside its crucial role in adipogenesis, PPARγ is also thought to play an important role in the maintenance of mature adipocyte function controlling the expression of metabolic key enzymes and glucose transporters28. Remarkably, PPARγ protein was most upregulated after 8 h of BMP stimulation (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1f. Pparγ mRNA expression was significantly induced in mature adipocytes after 4 and 10 h by both BMP2 and BMP6 (Fig. 1b). Thus, BMP2 or BMP6 signaling leads to upregulation of the transcription factor and nuclear receptor PPARγ in terminally differentiated adipocytes.
Effects of BMP2 and BMP6 on mature adipocytes are not redundant
To further investigate the transcriptional response of mature adipocytes to BMP2 and BMP6 treatment, we performed gene expression profiling. Upon 10 h of BMP2 or BMP6 treatment 800 genes and 965 genes respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1c and d) were significantly differentially expressed (p < 0.01) with an overlap of 648 genes. Model-based gene set analysis revealed GO terms such as ‘fat cell differentiation’, ‘response to cytokine’, and ‘intracellular signal transduction’ (Table 1). Hierarchical clustering resulted in five major clusters (Fig. 2). Cluster A comprises genes that display slightly higher upregulation after BMP2 treatment. Here, 54 of 164 genes are annotated to ‘regulation of signaling’ and 31 genes to ‘biological adhesion’. Cluster B refers to genes, which are similarly upregulated by BMP2 and BMP6. GO analyses revealed that 13 of 204 genes are annotated to ‘fat cell differentiation’ and 37 genes to ‘response to endogenous stimulus’. This cluster includes Pparg, Rxrα, and Smad9 (also known as Smad8) and well-known BMP targets like Id1-4. Genes in cluster C are slightly more responsive to BMP6. Nine out of 82 genes in this cluster are annotated to ‘ossification’. Cluster D contains almost half of all differentially expressed genes (541 genes). These genes are downregulated by BMP2 and BMP6 and annotated to ‘extracellular matrix’, ‘growth factor binding’, and ‘muscle system process’. Genes in cluster E are slightly more downregulated upon BMP6 treatment (93 genes). Downregulated genes include receptors like Acvr2a, Acvr2b, Tgfbr2, Tgfbr3, and ‘transcriptional repressors’ such as Hdac4 and Zbtb16. Both BMP ligands have similar effects on a great number of genes, but subsets of genes are regulated exclusively by BMP2 (152 genes) or BMP6 (317 genes).
PPARγ-target identification and validation
Motivated by these results, we compared our data to the putative PPARγ target genes identified by Nakachi et al.29. Indeed, we found 20 from 61 validated PPARγ targets and confirmed BMP-mediated differential expression for further 24 targets that contain a PPARγ response element (PPRE) in or in close proximity to their promoter region (Supplementary Table 1). Finally, we validated our findings in independent experiments. The PPARγ regulated genes Plin1 (Cluster B) and Lpl (Cluster A) were upregulated at 2 h, while Fasn (Cluster A) expression increased at 10 h (Fig. 3a–c). Gene expression of Glut1 (also known as Slc2a1), coding for glucose transporter 1 that is considered to reside constitutively at the plasma membrane of numerous cell types30, was not significantly regulated in our RNA-Seq data, but moderately upregulated by BMP2 and BMP6 as assessed by qPCR (Fig. 3d). In line with the RNA-seq data, the classical BMP-Smad-target Id1 and the PPARγ coreceptor Rxrα (Cluster B) were upregulated in BMP-stimulated samples at all time points analyzed (Figs 3e and f, Supplementary Fig. S1e). Moreover, Nampt, coding for the adipokine Visfatin was strongly upregulated after 24 h of BMP treatment (Fig. 3g). Contrary, long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) transporter Fatp1 (Scl27a1) and Leptin (Lep or Ob) found in Cluster D of the RNA-Seq results were downregulated by both BMP ligands after 10 h and 24 h of stimulation (Fig. 3h and i). Downregulation of the receptors Acvr2a, Acvr2b as well as Igf1r and Igf2r after 10 h of BMP stimulation was validated by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. S1g). Moreover, expression of the histone deacetylase 4 (Hdac4), a known negative regulator of GLUT4 (cluster E)31,32,33 was validated to be diminished after BMP-stimulation (Supplementary Fig. S3f). Taken together, we confirmed the BMP-specific modulation of genes from several Clusters of our RNA-Seq approach. In general, BMP stimulation of mature adipocytes not only upregulates PPARγ, but also modulates the expression of several genes involved in glucose and fatty acid metabolism/transportation and the adipokines Leptin and Visfatin.
BMP2 and BMP6 augment total GLUT4 levels
Both during adipocyte differentiation and after thiazolidinedione treatment in adult tissues34, GLUT4 expression is enhanced via PPARγ. Thus, we investigated changes of Glut4 expression on the transcriptional level. As shown in Fig. 4a, Glut4 mRNA expression was significantly induced 10 and 24 h upon BMP2 or BMP6 treatment. This effect was more pronounced for BMP6 and strongest upregulation was observed after 24 h. To assess the upregulation of GLUT4 protein, we performed intracellular immunostainings. Mature adipocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry with appropriate gating for size and granularity (Fig. 4b and c). Thereby, it was shown that BMP2 treatment led to a similar increase of GLUT4 protein as Rosiglitazone, while GLUT4 upregulation by BMP6 was slightly lower (Fig. 4b and c).
BMP2 and BMP6 exhibit no direct effect on insulin signaling
Recently, BMP7 was found to enhance insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in insulin sensitive tissues by increasing PI3K/Akt signaling and subsequently GLUT4 translocation35. Therefore, we investigated the effect of BMP2 and BMP6 on the cell surface exposure of GLUT4 derived from GLUT4 storage vesicles (GSVs). 3T3-L1 cells stably expressing GLUT4myc7-GFP (G7-adipocytes) allow a discrimination between total and surface located GLUT436. This is achieved via a C-terminal GFP-tag, which remains intracellular and 7 myc-tags in the first extracellular loop of GLUT4, which are available for antibody staining upon GLUT4 translocation to the surface. Differentiated G7-adipocytes were stimulated with BMP2, BMP6, insulin or combinations thereof for various periods and the abundance of surface GLUT4 was analyzed via flow cytometry (Fig. 4d). Insulin stimulation led to a clear shift in the GLUT4-myc7-PE signal, but no BMP effect on control (basal) or insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation was measured. Quantification of Mean Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) from multiple experiments confirmed that insulin-mediated GLUT4 translocation is not altered by treatment with either BMP2 or BMP6 (Fig. 4e). These findings suggest that there is no direct effect of BMP-signaling on GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane of differentiated adipocytes. Taken together, BMP2 and BMP6 did not directly affect the translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane.
The BMP and insulin pathways share multiple signaling components and were proposed to cross talk during brown adipogenesis19. Therefore, we investigated putative BMP effects on the phosphorylation status of Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160, also known as TBC1D4), which is the most proximal signaling step before GSV fusion to the plasma membrane. We stimulated differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes with BMP2, BMP6, insulin or Rosiglitazone for different periods and analyzed the phosphorylation status of insulin signaling components. Both AS160 and Akt (Ser473) were phosphorylated by insulin but not by BMP stimulation (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Fig. S2a). Moreover, we observed an insulin-sensitizing effect 4 hours after BMP2 or BMP6 stimulation (Supplementary Fig. S2b and c). Taken together, BMP2 and BMP6 did not affect the translocation of GLUT to the plasma membrane or interfere with insulin signaling but augmented total GLUT4 levels within the cell. Therefore, we conclude that BMP signaling modulates glucose transport by a rather indirect mechanism most likely via de novo protein synthesis.
BMP2 or BMP6 treatment enhances insulin-mediated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes
To address the physiological role of BMP-mediated upregulation of PPARγ and GLUT4, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, as one of the major functions of adipocytes, was analyzed. Mature adipocytes were stimulated with PBS (negative control), BMP2, BMP6 or the known insulin-sensitizer Rosiglitazone (positive control) for 18 h. Glucose uptake was measured after treatment with insulin or PBS for 30 minutes. Similar to Rosiglitazone, BMP2 and BMP6 pretreatment led to significantly higher insulin-mediated glucose uptake rates, as compared to control (1.5 fold, Fig. 5a). Remarkably, this effect was specific to BMP pathway activation, as pretreatment with the BMP type I receptor inhibitor LDN193189 abolished this effect (Supplementary Fig. S3d).TGF-β1, another member of the ligand family, had no impact on glucose uptake emphasizing a BMP-specific effect (Supplementary Fig. S2d and e).
Via chronic insulin stimulation we generated insulin-resistant 3T3-L1 adipocytes, which serve as an established model for adipose tissue insulin-resistance in type 2 diabetes37,38. Pretreatment with BMP2, BMP6, or Rosiglitazone significantly increased glucose uptake in these cells independent of an insulin pulse (Fig. 5b). In order to validate these findings and to gain more insight into the cellular energy metabolism, we next investigated the metabolic capacity using a Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer. The Seahorse technique allows the characterisation of metabolic changes in real-time by simultaneous measurement of the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), indicative of glycolysis and the oxygen consumption rate (OCR), indicative for mitochondrial respiration39. After three baseline measurements, insulin was injected to stimulate glucose uptake. BMP pretreatment led to an increase in ECAR (i.e. more rapid decrease in pH over time) compared to control and a respective decrease in OCR (Supplementary Fig. S2f and g). By injecting supplementary glucose at minute 36, a slight increase in ECAR persisted in all conditions. The injection of 2-Deoxyglucose (2-DG), a competitive inhibitor of glycolysis, caused a rapid drop in ECARs for all samples thereby verifying that the measured ECAR corresponded to changes in the glycolytic rate (Fig. 5c). Multiple independent extracellular flux experiments revealed that insulin-stimulated glycolysis was significantly enhanced in BMP2 or BMP6 treated mature adipocytes (Fig. 5d). Data obtained from tritium-labeled glucose uptake and metabolic measurements provide clear evidence, that both BMP2 and BMP6 promote glucose uptake and utilization via glycolysis in mature adipocytes. Finally, we tested, whether the observed upregulation of PPARγ is crucial for the BMP effect on glucose uptake. Mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes were electroporated with siRNA targeting Ppparγ at day 6 of differentiation, resulting in a knockdown efficiency of 60% at day 7 (Supplementary Fig. S3a and b). Knockdown of Ppparγ reduced Glut4 mRNA levels particularly in BMP stimulated cells, whereas other genes like the BMP/Smad target Id1 remained unaffected (Supplementary Fig. S3e). In contrast to si-scr transfected control cells, the enhancement of insulin sensitivity upon BMP stimulation was nearly completely abolished in PPARγ depleted cells (Fig. 5e). Notably, the slight reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by siPPARγ (~20% reduction) was not statistically significant when compared to si-scr. Rosiglitazone as the strongest known agonist of PPARγ enhances its transcriptional activity on target genes like Glut4 40. Compared to the insulin-sensitizing effect of Rosiglitazone alone, the combination of Rosiglitazone and BMP stimulation enhanced the insulin-stimulated glucose uptake significantly (Fig. 5f).
Taken together, our data suggest that the BMP-dependent upregulation of the nuclear receptor PPARγ is crucial for the insulin-sensitizing BMP effect. The BMP effect on glucose uptake can be further enhanced by the presence of Rosiglitazone.
Discussion
The identification and development of pharmacological insulin-sensitizers has led to promising ways to reduce insulin-resistance. However, especially the use of Rosiglitazone is under debate because of its side effects including cardiovascular complications and increased bone resorption. Since diabetes increases fracture risk with concomitant impaired healing capacities41, there is a strong need for further treatment strategies.
The expression of BMP2 in AT correlates with obesity parameters and diabetes status in patients, but the causality remains to be determined26. BMP6 is expressed in adult AT and also circulates in the blood23,24. However, its role in adult glucose/lipid metabolism has never been addressed. BMP2 promotes white adipogenesis in different precursor cells via Smad1/5/8 and Schnurri-2 (Shn-2)18,27. In contrast, BMP7, structurally similar to BMP6 but providing unique receptor binding properties, was shown to exclusively promote browning of human white adipocyte precursors and brown adipocyte differentiation18,42. BMP4, which is closely related to BMP2 was recently found to be upregulated in the serum of two diabetic mouse models and was proposed to contribute to insulin resistance by inhibiting IRS-1 activation and insulin signaling35. Furthermore, in a recently published gene therapy study, increased circulating BMP4 levels were shown to protect adult HFD-fed mice from obesity and improved their metabolic profile possibly due to increased browning of subcutaneous WAT17.
Here, we show that both BMP2 and BMP6 augment insulin-sensitivity in mature adipocytes. The effect on insulin-sensitive, as well as insulin-resistant adipocytes, is specific to BMPs since TGF-β1 stimulation had no influence on basal or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. BMP2 predominantly binds BMPR1A whereas BMP6 shows the highest affinity towards ACVR1A43, but both BMPs use BMPR2, ActR2a or ActR2b as their type II receptors. All these receptors are expressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes as well as in mature adipocytes (Supplementary Fig. S3c). Surprisingly, BMP6 treatment resulted in neither upregulation of brightening markers such as UCP-1 in 3T3-L1 cells nor increased OCR (Supplementary Fig. S2f). Although both BMP ligands have been reported to exert very different effects on adipogenesis, we demonstrate here that they have comparable effects on glucose uptake.
Glycolysis is the key process for energy storage in adipocytes and its modulation important to restore systemic glucose homeostasis44. In line with the glucose uptake data, the slope of the ECAR as a measure for cellular glycolysis was 2-fold increased in BMP-treated samples. Interestingly, many genes coding for glycolysis and lipogenesis enzymes like Hk2, Fasn and Scd1 are upregulated upon BMP stimulation as seen in our RNA-seq analyses. Recent studies indicate that higher GLUT4 levels in mice correlate with de novo lipogenesis bearing antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory effects on adipose tissue45. This is in accordance with our observations.
Chattopadhyay et al. recently described an insulin-sensitizing function for BMP7 in insulin-sensitive tissues in vivo and attributed this to enhanced PI3K/Akt signaling and subsequent GLUT4 translocation to the cell surface35. However, using the GLUT4myc7-GFP cell line to monitor GLUT4 translocation to the cell surface of intact cells, we show that BMP2/6 signaling does not directly influence GLUT4 storage vesicle translocation. Both results on translocation of GLUT4 to the cell surface and on AS160 phosphorylation by Akt, clearly demonstrate no direct effect of BMP2 and BMP6 on this branch of the insulin signaling pathway. Akt signaling, which is activated by BMP signaling in many cell types represents a pro-survival signal. Moreover, the presence of high glucose was found to activate basal TGF-β/Smad signaling and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in MEFs46. We investigated a putative crosstalk of both pathways on this level, but neither Akt nor AS160 phosphorylation was observed after BMP stimulation. This is in line with our observations that BMP signaling alone as well as short-term stimulations (Supplementary Fig. S2b) of BMP2/6 together with insulin did not increase glucose uptake rates, clearly points towards changes on the transcriptional level.
Indeed, we observed an upregulation of Glut4 mRNA upon BMP stimulation especially after 24 h. Earlier studies have shown that PPARγ ligands such as Rosiglitazone induce Glut4 transcription during adipogenesis47. In line with this, Hdac4 a negative regulator of Glut4 expression was found to be downregulated, thus enabling upregulation of the glucose transporter. Here we demonstrate that BMP2 and BMP6 increased GLUT4 protein levels comparable to Rosiglitazone. This is of particular interest with regard to studies demonstrating that physical training is the strongest stimulus to enhance GLUT4 expression in skeletal muscle48. As the BMP/Smad pathway was shown in several cell types to be activated upon mechanical/physical stimuli6, this link might indicate GLUT4 as a potential downstream effector of both biochemical and biomechanical signaling in muscle but also other tissues such as AT. Moreover, Glut1 seems to be moderately upregulated by BMP treatment, which explains the slight increase in basal glucose uptake (1.3 fold compared to control) observed in BMP-stimulated mature adipocytes.
We propose that GLUT4 is upregulated by BMP/Smad activation, subsequent to PPARγ induction. The master regulator of adipogenesis and adipocyte function, PPARγ, is significantly upregulated as early as 4 h after BMP stimulation on mRNA level and peaks at 8 h on protein level in 3T3-L1 cells. The promoter region of Pparg contains six conserved Smad1/5/8 binding sites, further indicating Pparg as a direct BMP-Smad target, also in terminally differentiated cells49. We clearly show that the BMP-stimulated upregulation of PPARγ is causative for the insulin-sensitizing effect since it is attenuated in PPARγ-depleted cells. This confirms previous studies on decreased GLUT4 levels by reduction of PPARγ50 (Supplementary Fig. S3e) and presents BMPs as a promising new insulin-sensitizing stimulus. Interestingly, costimulation with BMPs and Rosiglitazone led to even higher insulin-mediated glucose uptake rates compared to Rosiglitazone alone and further confirms PPARγ as the central mediator. From this we conclude that the PPARγ-mediated upregulation of GLUT4 is crucial for the insulin-sensitizing effect of BMP.
Besides the Smad pathway, BMPs also induce the MAPK pathway. The activation of p38 MAPK by BMP2/6 seen here might explain previous results by others on MAPK modulating the transcriptional activity of PPARγ27,51. In future studies it might be interesting to examine whether BMP2/6 heterodimers, which were shown to more potently activate Smad- and non-Smad pathways in hES cells52, might also induce stronger downstream effects in mature adipocytes.
To analyze comprehensive transcriptional changes in mature adipocytes stimulated with BMPs, we performed RNA-seq. Besides the classical BMP-target genes as Smad6, Smad7, Smad9, and Id1-4 also PPARγ target genes such as Lpl, Plin and Fasn, involved in glucose and lipid metabolism and the PPARγ co-receptor Rxra Rxra XRa were upregulated. Conversely, Fatp1 was considerably downregulated after 10 h BMP treatment, while time-resolved analyses revealed that it is upregulated in control conditions. This suggests a compensatory mechanism to overcome the prolonged experimental starvation by upregulating the LCFA transporter and to import more fatty acids. BMP stimulation seems to prevent this effect, indicating that de novo lipogenesis might be enhanced, which is reflected by the upregulation of Fasn. The adipokine Leptin was reported to not only regulate appetite, energy balance, and adiposity but also to function as a proinflammatory cytokine implicated in tumorigenesis and hypertension53. Since in obesity, chronic low-grade inflammation in adipose tissue and high blood pressure accompany insulin-resistance, the BMP-mediated downregulation of proinflammatory factors shown here is of great importance. Both BMP4 and BMP6 have been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects in human adipocytes and in the context of renal fibrosis in diabetes, respectively54,55.
Based on our findings, we propose BMP2 and BMP6 as new potent insulin-sensitizers in adipocytes. Interestingly, these BMPs upregulate a very specific set of target genes refining the metabolic capacity of mature adipocytes (Fig. 6). Their effect is mediated by the transcriptional upregulation of PPARγ and subsequent modulation of PPRE-containing target genes. This mechanism clearly differs from the action of known insulin-sensitizers like thiazolidinediones acting as nuclear receptor agonists. It is tempting to speculate, that upregulation of these specific BMPs in adipose tissue is a compensatory mechanism of the body to cope with high glucose concentrations and emerging insulin resistance. This is in line with the finding that BMP2 mRNA is most upregulated in adipose tissue of individuals with impaired glucose tolerance26. We propose a dual mechanism: (1) promoting differentiation of residual preadipocytes in the tissue in combination with (2) PPARγ induction, targeting GLUT4 and genes related to lipid metabolism in mature adipocytes, to exert maximal glucose metabolism. Thus, the modulation of BMP signal transduction regulating PPARγ and its target genes in adult tissues harbors a great potential to treat insulin resistance.
Methods
Reagents/Cytokines
Recombinant human BMP2 was kindly provided by Walter Sebald (University of Würzburg, Germany) and used at a final concentration of 10 nM or 20 nM. BMP6 was provided by Slobodan Vukicevic (University of Zagreb, Croatia) and used at a final concentration of 10 nM. TGF-β1 was obtained from PeproTech and used at 100 pM. Recombinant insulin (Roche Diagnostics) was used at a final concentration of 100 nM and Rosiglitazone (Sigma-Aldrich) at 10 µM.
Cell culture and transfections
3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured and differentiated in high glucose medium (25 mM) as described previously56. Experiments were carried out at d8 or d9 after induction of differentiation. GLUT4myc7-GFP 3T3-L1-preadipocytes were sorted for the intermediate high GFP-expressing population and differentiated like 3T3-L136. Insulin-resistant 3T3-L1 were generated via chronic insulin-stimulation37. Knockdown of PPARγ by 75 nmol siRNA oligonucleotides (ON-TARGET plus PPARγ Smart Pool #1 CGAAGAACCAUCCGAUUGA, #2 ACCCAAUGGUUGCUGAUUA, #3 UCACAAUGCCAUCAGGUUU, #4 CGACAUGAAUUCCUUAAUG and ON-TARGET plus non-targeting siRNA #1 UGGUUUACAUGUCGACUAA; Dharmacon/Thermo Fischer) was performed in mature 3T3-L1 cells by electroporation (Neon transfection kit, Thermo Fisher).
2-Deoxyglucose uptake
3T3-L1 cells were incubated in FCS- and glucose-free DMEM at 37 °C for 2 h and subsequently stimulated with 100 nM insulin (Roche Diagnostics) or PBS for 30 min. Subsequently, 0.5 µCi/ml 2-deoxy-D-[3H]glucose (ARC American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc.) were added for 10 min at 37 °C. Before lysis in 0.1 M NaOH, cells were washed once with KRH buffer containing 25 mM D-glucose and twice with PBS. Liquid scintillation (Ultima Gold Scintillation Cocktail, Perkin Elmer) measurements were performed in triplicates and counts per minute (CPM) were normalized to total protein determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher).
Flow cytometric analyses and immunofluorescence microscopy
3T3-L1 cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, stained with BODIPY 493/503 (Molecular Probes, 1 µg/ml final) for 5 min, and analyzed via flow cytometry (BD CantoII or Beckman Coulter Epics XL-MCL). GLUT4myc7-GFP-assays were performed as described previously36. Intracellular GLUT4 (3G10A3, Thermo Fisher) staining of 3T3-L1 cells was performed after treatment with FACS Lysing Solution and Permeabilizing Solution 2 (BD) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For epifluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200) using AxioVision software, cells were fixed (4% PFA), permeabilized (0.2% Triton X-100), and stained with BODIPY 493/503 (1 µg/µl, Thermo Fisher), DAPI (0.2 µg/µl, Sigma-Aldrich) and Phalloidin (1:200, Santa Cruz). At least 15,000 cells per sample were analyzed.
Extracellular Flux (XF) measurements
Adipocytes were differentiated until day 7, reseeded in XF96 cell culture microplates (Agilent Technologies) at a density of 15.000/well, and stimulated with BMPs or PBS overnight in medium containing 0.5% FCS. Before measurements, cells (d8) were incubated for 1 h in assay medium (phenol-free DMEM, 1.85 g/L NaCl, 2 mM L-glutamine, 5.5 mM D-glucose, pH 7.4) in a CO2 free incubator at 37 °C. ECAR and OCR were measured simultaneously in multiple series of 4 min mixing and 2 min measurement steps with a Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies) as described previously57. Final concentrations of 100 nM insulin, 10 mM D-glucose, and 100 nM 2-DG were injected at indicated time points. Values were normalized to total protein content determined by BCA protein assay.
Immunoblotting
Phosphoprotein assays and Western blot analyses of cell lysates were performed as described previously58. Antibodies were used following manufacturer’s recommendations: PPARγ (#2435), P-Smad1/5/8 (#9511 L), P-Smad 1/5/9 (#13820), P-ERK1/2 (#4370), P-AS160 (#4288), AS160 (#2670, GAPDH (#2118), P-AktSer473 (#4060 L), P-AktThr308 (#2965 S) and Akt (pan) (#4691) Smad 1 (#6944) p38 (#8690) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling, the anti-active p38 antibody (1:1000) from Promega and the β-Actin antibody (1:5000, A5441) from Sigma-Aldrich.
Quantitative RT-PCR and whole transcriptome analysis
RNA was purified using NucleoSpin RNA II (Machery-Nagel) according to manufacturer’s instructions. 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA (M-MLV reverse transcriptase, Promega). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix, StepOne Plus and StepOne Software 2.3 (Applied Biosystems). Target gene expression was quantified relative to 18S rRNA using the ΔΔCT method including primer efficiency59. Measurements were done in technical triplicates. For RNAseq, 1 µg RNA per sample was subjected to library preparation (NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit, NEB) and sequenced by the BCRT NGS core facility (HiSeq. 1500 RNA sequencer, Illumina).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses for qRT-PCR, glucose uptake and glycolysis were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc.). Normal distribution of the qRT-PCR results was tested with the D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test. In the case of normal distribution, the ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test were used to check for statistical significance. Otherwise the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were applied.
Normal distribution of the results for glucose uptake and extracellular flux measurements was tested with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. In the case of normal distribution, the ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test were used to check for statistical significance. Otherwise the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were applied. For all experiments statistical significance was assigned, in case of *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
RNA-seq data was mapped to the mouse genome (mm9). Differential expression was determined by DEseq. 2 analysis. Cutoff values for statistical significance were defined based on volcano plots. Genes with an absolute fold change > 1.5 and adjusted p-value < 0.01 were assessed to be significantly differentially expressed. For heatmaps, RPKM-values of these genes were scaled to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. Based on these vectors hierarchical clustering was performed and five clusters were identified by visual inspection. MGSA and Parent-Child-Intersection method of the Ontologizer60 were used for GO analyses. GO terms with Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05 were considered as significant. PPARγ target genes were derived from Nackachi et al.29.
References
Berger, J. et al. Decreased expression of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter in diabetes and fasting. Nature 340, 70–72, https://doi.org/10.1038/340070a0 (1989).
Nissen, S. E. & Wolski, K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 356, 2457–2471, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072761 (2007).
Wei, W. et al. PGC1beta mediates PPARgamma activation of osteoclastogenesis and rosiglitazone-induced bone loss. Cell Metab 11, 503–516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.015 (2010).
Urist, M. R. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 150, 893–899 (1965).
Grgurevic, L., Christensen, G. L., Schulz, T. J. & Vukicevic, S. Bone morphogenetic proteins in inflammation, glucose homeostasis and adipose tissue energy metabolism. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 27, 105–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.12.009 (2016).
Kopf, J., Paarmann, P., Hiepen, C., Horbelt, D. & Knaus, P. BMP growth factor signaling in a biomechanical context. Biofactors 40, 171–187, https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1137 (2014).
Schleinitz, D. et al. Genetic and evolutionary analyses of the human bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 (BMPR2) in the pathophysiology of obesity. PLoS One 6, e16155, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016155 (2011).
Bottcher, Y. et al. Adipose tissue expression and genetic variants of the bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A gene (BMPR1A) are associated with human obesity. Diabetes 58, 2119–2128, https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-1458 (2009).
Schulz, T. J. et al. Loss of BMP receptor type 1A in murine adipose tissue attenuates age-related onset of insulin resistance. Diabetologia, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3990-8 (2016).
Mullican, S. E. et al. GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and the ligand promotes weight loss in mice and nonhuman primates. Nat Med 23, 1150–1157, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4392 (2017).
Emmerson, P. J. et al. The metabolic effects of GDF15 are mediated by the orphan receptor GFRAL. Nat Med 23, 1215–1219, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4393 (2017).
Yang, L. et al. GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and is required for the anti-obesity effects of the ligand. Nat Med 23, 1158–1166, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4394 (2017).
Hiepen, C., Yadin, D., Rikeit, P., Dorpholz, G. & Knaus, P. Actions from head to toe: An update on Bone/Body Morphogenetic Proteins in health and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 27, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.12.006 (2016).
Tseng, Y. H. et al. New role of bone morphogenetic protein 7 in brown adipogenesis and energy expenditure. Nature 454, 1000–1004, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07221 (2008).
Huang, H. et al. BMP signaling pathway is required for commitment of C3H10T1/2 pluripotent stem cells to the adipocyte lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 12670–12675, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906266106 (2009).
Bowers, R. R., Kim, J. W., Otto, T. C. & Lane, M. D. Stable stem cell commitment to the adipocyte lineage by inhibition of DNA methylation: role of the BMP-4 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 13022–13027, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605789103 (2006).
Hoffmann, J. M. et al. BMP4 Gene Therapy in Mature Mice Reduces BAT Activation but Protects from Obesity by Browning Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. Cell Rep 20, 1038–1049, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.020 (2017).
Elsen, M. et al. BMP4 and BMP7 induce the white-to-brown transition of primary human adipose stem cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 306, C431–440, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00290.2013 (2014).
Zhang, H. et al. Cross talk between insulin and bone morphogenetic protein signaling systems in brown adipogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 30, 4224–4233, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00363-10 (2010).
Bluher, M. Adipokines - removing road blocks to obesity and diabetes therapy. Mol Metab 3, 230–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2014.01.005 (2014).
Qian, S. W. et al. BMP4-mediated brown fat-like changes in white adipose tissue alter glucose and energy homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E798–807, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215236110 (2013).
Chen, C. et al. An integrated functional genomics screening program reveals a role for BMP-9 in glucose homeostasis. Nat Biotech 21, 294-301, http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v21/n3/suppinfo/nbt795_S1.html (2003).
Krause, C. The Imperative Balance of Agonist and Antagonist for BMP Signalling Driven Adult Tissue Homeostasis. Austin Biomark Diagn. 1, 2 (2014).
Herrera, B. & Inman, G. J. A rapid and sensitive bioassay for the simultaneous measurement of multiple bone morphogenetic proteins. Identification and quantification of BMP4, BMP6 and BMP9 in bovine and human serum. BMC Cell Biol 10, 20, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-10-20 (2009).
Sharma, A. et al. Brown fat determination and development from muscle precursor cells by novel action of bone morphogenetic protein 6. PLoS One 9, e92608, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092608 (2014).
Guiu-Jurado, E. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) may contribute to partition of energy storage into visceral and subcutaneous fat depots. Obesity (Silver Spring), https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21571 (2016).
Hata, K. et al. Differential roles of Smad1 and p38 kinase in regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activating receptor gamma during bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced adipogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 14, 545–555, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0356 (2003).
Siersbaek, R., Nielsen, R. & Mandrup, S. PPARgamma in adipocyte differentiation and metabolism–novel insights from genome-wide studies. FEBS Lett 584, 3242–3249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.06.010 (2010).
Nakachi, Y. et al. Identification of novel PPARgamma target genes by integrated analysis of ChIP-on-chip and microarray expression data during adipocyte differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 372, 362–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.037 (2008).
Marshall, B. A. & Mueckler, M. M. Differential effects of GLUT-1 or GLUT-4 overexpression on insulin responsiveness in transgenic mice. Am J Physiol 267, E738–744 (1994).
Henriksson, E. et al. SIK2 regulates CRTCs, HDAC4 and glucose uptake in adipocytes. J Cell Sci 128, 472–486, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.153932 (2015).
Weems, J. C., Griesel, B. A. & Olson, A. L. Class II histone deacetylases downregulate GLUT4 transcription in response to increased cAMP signaling in cultured adipocytes and fasting mice. Diabetes 61, 1404–1414, https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-0737 (2012).
Winbanks, C. E. et al. The bone morphogenetic protein axis is a positive regulator of skeletal muscle mass. J Cell Biol 203, 345–357, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201211134 (2013).
Ciaraldi, T. & Henry, R. R. Thiazolidinediones and their effects on glucose transporters. Eur J Endocrinol 137, 610–612 (1997).
Chattopadhyay, T., Singh, R. R., Gupta, S. & Surolia, A. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) augments insulin sensitivity in mice with type II diabetes mellitus by potentiating PI3K/AKT pathway. Biofactors. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1334 (2017).
Bogan, J. S., McKee, A. E. & Lodish, H. F. Insulin-responsive compartments containing GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 and CHO cells: regulation by amino acid concentrations. Mol Cell Biol 21, 4785–4806, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.14.4785-4806.2001 (2001).
Knutson, V. P. & Balba, Y. 3T3-L1 adipocytes as a cell culture model of insulin resistance. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33, 77–81 (1997).
Thomson, M. J., Williams, M. G. & Frost, S. C. Development of insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem 272, 7759–7764 (1997).
Ferrick, D. A., Neilson, A. & Beeson, C. Advances in measuring cellular bioenergetics using extracellular flux. Drug Discov Today 13, 268–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2007.12.008 (2008).
Way, J. M. et al. Comprehensive messenger ribonucleic acid profiling reveals that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation has coordinate effects on gene expression in multiple insulin-sensitive tissues. Endocrinology 142, 1269–1277, https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.3.8037 (2001).
Jiao, H., Xiao, E. & Graves, D. T. Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep 13, 327–335, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-015-0286-8 (2015).
Schulz, T. J. et al. Brown-fat paucity due to impaired BMP signalling induces compensatory browning of white fat. Nature 495, 379–383, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11943 (2013).
Lavery, K., Swain, P., Falb, D. & Alaoui-Ismaili, M. H. BMP-2/4 and BMP-6/7 differentially utilize cell surface receptors to induce osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem 283, 20948–20958, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800850200 (2008).
Guo, X. et al. Glycolysis in the control of blood glucose homeostasis. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2, 358–367, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2012.06.002 (2012).
Moraes-Vieira, P. M., Saghatelian, A. & Kahn, B. B. GLUT4 Expression in Adipocytes Regulates De Novo Lipogenesis and Levels of a Novel Class of Lipids With Antidiabetic and Anti-inflammatory Effects. Diabetes 65, 1808–1815, https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0221 (2016).
Wu, L. & Derynck, R. Essential role of TGF-beta signaling in glucose-induced cell hypertrophy. Dev Cell 17, 35–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.05.010 (2009).
Wu, Z., Xie, Y., Morrison, R. F., Bucher, N. L. & Farmer, S. R. PPARgamma induces the insulin-dependent glucose transporter GLUT4 in the absence of C/EBPalpha during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes. J Clin Invest 101, 22–32, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI1244 (1998).
Richter, E. A. & Hargreaves, M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol Rev 93, 993–1017, https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00038.2012 (2013).
Jin, W. et al. Schnurri-2 controls BMP-dependent adipogenesis via interaction with Smad proteins. Dev Cell 10, 461–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.016 (2006).
Liao, W. et al. Suppression of PPAR-gamma attenuates insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by affecting both GLUT1 and GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 293, E219–227, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00695.2006 (2007).
Somwar, R. et al. A dominant-negative p38 MAPK mutant and novel selective inhibitors of p38 MAPK reduce insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes without affecting GLUT4 translocation. J Biol Chem 277, 50386–50395, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205277200 (2002).
Valera, E., Isaacs, M. J., Kawakami, Y., Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. & Choe, S. BMP-2/6 heterodimer is more effective than BMP-2 or BMP-6 homodimers as inductor of differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 5, e11167, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011167 (2010).
Bell, B. B. & Rahmouni, K. Leptin as a Mediator of Obesity-Induced Hypertension. Curr Obes Rep, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-016-0231-x (2016).
Dendooven, A. et al. Loss of endogenous bone morphogenetic protein-6 aggravates renal fibrosis. Am J Pathol 178, 1069–1079, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.005 (2011).
Baraban, E. et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of bone morphogenetic protein 4 in human adipocytes. Int J Obes (Lond) 40, 319–327, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.141 (2016).
Frost, S. C. & Lane, M. D. Evidence for the involvement of vicinal sulfhydryl groups in insulin-activated hexose transport by 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem 260, 2646–2652 (1985).
Bugge, A., Dib, L. & Collins, S. Measuring respiratory activity of adipocytes and adipose tissues in real time. Methods Enzymol 538, 233–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800280-3.00013-X (2014).
Paarmann, P. et al. Dynamin-dependent endocytosis of Bone Morphogenetic Protein2 (BMP2) and its receptors is dispensable for the initiation of Smad signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 76, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.04.010 (2016).
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29, e45 (2001).
Bauer, S., Grossmann, S., Vingron, M. & Robinson, P. N. Ontologizer 2.0–a multifunctional tool for GO term enrichment analysis and data exploration. Bioinformatics 24, 1650–1651, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn250 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by DFG (RU 1855/1-1) to PK and KR and DDG to KR and IS. PK and IS received funding from BSRT/DFG GSC203 and DFG/SFB958. GD received funding from the Sonnenfeld Stiftung. Joachim Füllekrug (University of Heidelberg) kindly provided GLUT4myc7-GFP cells. Recombinant BMP6 was a gift by Slobodan Vukicevic, University of Zagreb. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the BCRT Flow Cytometry Lab and the BCRT-NGS core facility namely Ulrike Krüger and Desiree Kunkel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.S. performed experiments, evaluated data, and drafted the manuscript. K.R. evaluated data, edited the manuscript. C.E.O. performed RNA-seq analyses with I.S., edited the manuscript. C.T.L. performed experiments, edited the manuscript. G.D. performed experiments, evaluated data and edited the manuscript. B.J. and S.M. contributed to discussion and edited the manuscript. N.S. and J.K. helped with Seahorse experiments and edited the manuscript. P.K. designed this study, evaluated data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. P.K. is the guarantor of this work and had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schreiber, I., Dörpholz, G., Ott, CE. et al. BMPs as new insulin sensitizers: enhanced glucose uptake in mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes via PPARγ and GLUT4 upregulation. Sci Rep 7, 17192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17595-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17595-5
This article is cited by
-
An atlas of genome-wide gene expression and metabolite associations and possible mediation effects towards body mass index
Journal of Molecular Medicine (2023)
-
Signaling pathways in obesity: mechanisms and therapeutic interventions
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)
-
Endocrine role of bone in the regulation of energy metabolism
Bone Research (2021)
-
LMO3 reprograms visceral adipocyte metabolism during obesity
Journal of Molecular Medicine (2021)
-
A novel role of bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP6) in glucose homeostasis
Acta Diabetologica (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.