Article | Open

Hypersensitivity of BRCA2 deficient cells to rosemary extract explained by weak PARP inhibitory activity

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 16704 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16795-3
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Rosemary extract is used in food additives and traditional medicine and has been observed to contain anti-tumor activity. In this study, rosemary extract is hypothesized to induce synthetic lethality in BRCA2 deficient cells by PARP inhibition. Chinese hamster lung V79 cells and its mutant cell lines, V-C8 (BRCA2 deficient) and V-C8 with BRCA2 gene correction were used. Rosemary extract and its major constituent chemicals were tested for their cytotoxicity by colony formation assay in cells of different BRCA2 status. The latter chemicals were tested for inhibitory effect of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activity in vitro and in vivo. Rosemary has shown selective cytotoxicity against V-C8 cells (IC50 17 µg/ml) compared to V79 cells (IC50 26 µg/ml). Among tested chemicals, gallic acid and carnosic acid showed selective cytotoxicity to V-C8 cells along with PARP inhibitory effects. Carnosol showed comparative PARP inhibitory effects at 100 µM compared to carnosic acid and gallic acid, but the selective cytotoxicity was not observed. In conclusion, we predict that within rosemary extract two specific constituent components; gallic acid and carnosic acid were the cause for the synthetic lethality.

Introduction

Rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis, is a common evergreen herb frequently used in cooking and traditional medicine1. Rosemary extract contains essential oils, terpenoids, flavonoids, and alkaloids1 including rosmarinic acid, carnosic acid, carnosol, tannic acid, and gallic acid which have been the focus of many experiments centered around the cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory, and genotoxicity of the purified components of rosemary2,3,4. Recently, studies have theorized that rosemary extract can provide significant antiproliferative effects on many different cancer cell lines5,6. Specifically, it has been proposed that two compounds, carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid, are the cause for the observed anti-tumor affect in various human cancer cell lines including lung, prostate, liver, and breast cancers7. Because of this, cancer research centered on the effects of rosemary extract is very promising.

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, and BRCA2 deficiency is a clear genetic mutation that increases the risk of hereditary breast cancer. Although genetic factors are not the primary cause of breast cancer, only accounting for approximately 5–10% of all cases, this is a factor that cannot be controlled by the patient or managed through a physician with the exception of a mastectomy8. BRCA2 is a human tumor suppressor gene involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair and is observed to be commonly mutated in breast tumors9. Women with the heterozygous mutation suffer from a large increased risk of developing breast cancer in their lifetime. They also have an increased risk of developing other cancers, including ovarian cancers10. However, recent studies suggest that the inhibition of an enzyme associated with single strand break repair, poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP), in BRCA1/2 homozygous mutated cells results in selective cell killing11,12. This synthetic lethality occurs in BRCA1/2 homozygous mutated cancer cells but not BRCA1/2 heterozygous normal tissues, making this a favorable target for potential cancer therapy or preventative treatments. In our previous studies, it was observed that natural flavonoid chemicals, similar to the 24 identified flavonoids found in rosemary13, often have PARP inhibitory effects14,15. We hypothesized that rosemary extract may contain chemicals that have PARP inhibitory activity that would result in selective killing of BRCA1/2 deficiency cells. Expanding this research might be a viable option in developing new types of therapeutic treatments. By combining current chemotherapy treatment options with proposed PARP inhibitory treatments, the sensitivity of HR deficient cancer types may increase; thus, both decreasing unwanted side effects and increasing projected patient survival rates16,17.

We used BRCA2 deficient cells commonly found in familial breast tumors. The potential for rosemary extract to inhibit PARP was investigated as one of the possible primary mechanisms of action. We suggest that this led to the selective killing of the BRCA2 deficient cells.

Results

BRCA2 selective cytotoxic effect of rosemary extract

Chinese hamster lung V79 cells and its mutant cell lines, V-C8 (BRCA2 deficient) and V-C8 with BRCA2 gene correction, were used for colony formation assay to determine the effect of rosemary extract (Fig. 1A). IC50 of clonogenicity for V-C8 cells under treatment of rosemary extract was observed to be 17.8 µg/ml, while IC50 of clonogenicity for V79 cells and gene corrected cells were 26.5 and 22.7 µg/ml, respectively. Rosemary extract showed a selective cytotoxicity to V-C8 cells. Statistically significant differences for survival rates were observed at the concentration above 20 µg/ml between V79 and V-C8 cells (Fig. 1A). Cytotoxicity was also assessed through cell doubling time (Fig. 1B). Cell doubling time of V79 was measured to be 12 hours without treatment. Rosemary extract in the culture media showed the ability to postpone cell growth in all cell lines above 10 µg/ml. Cell doubling time of V79, originally 12 hours increased to 22 hours (P = 0.0309), and V-C8 changed from 15 hours to 30 hours (P = 0.0089). However, gene corrected cells yielded a smaller change of 14 hours to 21 hours (P = 0.23) following 15 µg/ml rosemary extract treatment. Therefore, the differences in cell doubling time were marginal and were not dependent on BRCA2 deficiency.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Cytotoxicity to rosemary extract. (A) Cell survival fraction obtained by colony formation assay for hamster cells. Black bars indicate V79, blue bars indicate gene corrected V-C8, and red bars indicate V-C8 cells. (B) Elongation of cell doubling time with high concentrations of rosemary extract exposure. (C) Cell survival fraction obtained by colony formation assay for human cells. Black bars indicate A549, white bars indicate MCF7, blue bars indicate AG1522, and red bars indicate VU423F BRCA2 deficient cells. At least three independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. P-values represent two-way ANOVA results. *symbols indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Additional colony formation assay was conducted to confirm cytotoxicity dependence on BRCA2 deficiency. In comparison to both normal and cancerous cell lines, Fig. 1C shows that the cytotoxicity of rosemary extract was more severe in VU423F, a Fanconi anemia cell line with BRCA2 mutations. At 5 µg/ml, selective cytotoxicity to VU423F cells had P-values of 0.0012 for A549, 0.0001 for MCF7, and 0.0026 for AG1522. At 10 µg/ml, P-values were 0.007 for A549, 0.0266 for MCF7, and 0.0199 for AG1522. At 15 µg/ml, BRCA2 normal cells showed cytotoxicity and no significant differences were observed in comparison to VU423F.

In vitro PARP inhibitory effect and DNA damage formation by rosemary extract

Rosemary extract was tested for in vitro PARP inhibitory capability. IC50 value of PARP activity inhibition was approximately 130 µg/ml. Positive control 3-aminobenzamide showed stronger PARP inhibitory capacity with IC50 value of 55 µg/ml (Fig. 2A). Rosemary extract was observed as weaker but comparative PARP inhibitor when compared to 3-aminobenzamide.

Figure 2
Figure 2

In vitro PARP inhibitory effect and DNA damage formation by rosemary extract. (A) PARP activity in the presence of rosemary extract or 3 aminobenzamide. (B) Massive DNA double strand break formation after overnight rosemary extract treatment. At least three independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered to be statistical significant.

Rosemary extract was tested for BRCA2 dependent DNA damage formation (Fig. 2B). 20 µg/ml of rosemary extract treatment overnight induced massive DNA double strand break formation, categorized as more than 5 gamma-H2AX foci per cell in V-C8 cells (50%) but less frequently observed in V79 and gene corrected cells (15%).

In vitro PARP inhibitory effects of the major rosemary extract compounds

10, 100 and 1000 µM solutions of carnosic acid, carnosol, rosmarinic acid, and gallic acid were tested for PARP inhibitory effect in vitro (Fig. 3). Dose dependent PARP inhibitory effect was observed. A 100 µM concentration of carnosol, carnosic acid, and gallic acid showed similar PARP inhibitory effects, which inhibited 70% of PAR formation. However, a 100 µM concentration of rosmarinic acid did not show strong inhibitory effects (20% inhibition) compared to the other three tested compounds. IC50 values were calculated as 6, 35, 50, and 200 µM for gallic acid, carnosol, carnosic acid, and rosmarinic acid, respectively.

Figure 3
Figure 3

In vitro PARP inhibitory effect of carnosol, carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid, and gallic acid. At least three independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. *symbol indicates statistical significant reduction compared to control (P < 0.05).

In vivo PARP inhibitory effects of the rosemary extract and its major compounds

Prior to H2O2 treatment, 10 µg/ml of rosemary extract and 10 µM solutions of carnosic acid, carnosol, rosmarinic acid, and gallic acid were added to media and their PARP inhibitory effects were assessed by measuring poly (ADP-ribose) formation in cells (Fig. 4A). Rosemary extract (P = 0.0173), carnosol (P = 0.0007), and gallic acid (P = 0.0072) showed statistically significant reduction of poly (ADP-ribose) formation in the tested condition. Carnosic acid showed a reduction trend (78% of H2O2 control) but displayed no significant signal reduction (P = 0.3382). Observation of rosmarinic acid showed induction rather than noticeable reduction of fluorescence signals indicating poly (ADP-ribose) polymerization (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4
Figure 4

In vivo PARP inhibitory effect by rosemary extract and its major compounds. (A) Representative images of H2O2 induced poly (ADP-ribose) formation as green signals. Blue signals are nuclei. (B) Quantitative analysis of poly (ADP-ribose) formation by green pixel analysis. Average green pixels per cell (arbitrary unit). At least three independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. *symbols indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

BRCA2 selective cytotoxicity in the major compounds of rosemary extract

To identify which compounds caused the observed selective cytotoxicity to BRCA2 deficient cells by rosemary extract treatment, carnosic acid, carnosol, rosmarinic acid, and gallic acid were investigated (Fig. 5A–D). These four chemicals were tested due to their ability to inhibit PARP. Among the four tested chemicals carnosol and gallic acid showed selective cytotoxicity to V-C8 cells with treatment concentrations greater than 7.5 µM. The IC50 of cell survival against carnosol and gallic acid in BRCA2 deficient cells was measured to be approximately 6 µM. Carnosic acid showed significant cytotoxic effects above the concentration of 5 µM. Cell survival against carnosic acid in BRCA2 deficient cells had a IC50 value of 4 µM. However, rosmarinic acid failed to show cytotoxicity effects in V79, V-C8, and gene corrected cells for all tested concentrations up to 10 µM.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Cell survival curves against chemicals. (A) Carnosic acid (B) Gallic acid (C) Carnosol (D) Rosmarinic acid (E) Olaparib, (F) NU1025. Black bars indicate V79, blue bars indicate gene corrected V-C8, and red bars indicate V-C8 cells. At least three independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. P-values represent two-way ANOVA analysis between V79 and V-C8. P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered to be statistical significant.

Olaparib and NU1025, known selective PARP inhibitors, were used as positive controls (Fig. 5E–F). Olaparib and NU1025 showed severe selective cytotoxicity to BRCA2 deficient cells. In olaparib treated V79 cells, IC50 value of cell survival was measured at 10 µM and IC50 for cell survival in V-C8 cells was less than 0.01 µM. NU1025 showed selective cytotoxicity to BRCA2 deficient cells above 10 µM. It was observed that BRCA2 deficient cells required higher concentrations of NU1025 to display selective cytotoxicity compared to carnosic acid.

Assessment of contribution from major compounds

PARP inhibitory effect and cytotoxicity of rosemary extract were assessed by IC50 to identify the contribution of major compounds. Among four tested chemicals, two major compounds, carnosol and carnosic acid consists approximately 13.9% and 9.5% of rosemary extract. If these chemicals are major reasons to cause cytotoxicity and PARP inhibitory effect, they should be 10 times effective per concentration than rosemary extract. IC50 of in vitro PARP inhibitory effect was 130 µg/ml for rosemary extract, 34 µM (11 µg/ml) for carnosol and 50 µM (15 µg/ml) for carnosic acid. Therefore, carnosol and carnosic acid are approximately 10 times stronger PARP inhibitors compared to rosemary extract. Major part of PARP inhibitory effect in rosemary extract can be explained by carnosol and carnosic acid. In contrast, the IC50 of V-C8 cytotoxicity was 17.8 µg/ml for rosemary extract (Fig. 1A), 4 µ M (1.3 µg/ml) for carnosol, 5 µ M (1.6 µg/ml) for carnosic acid. V-C8 cells were 10 times sensitive to carnosol and carnosic acid than rosemary extract. Therefore, carnosol and carnosic acid can account major part of cytotoxicity in rosemary extract to V-C8 cells.

Discussion

In this study, we showed rosemary extract can cause synthetic lethality in BRCA2 deficient cells through PARP inhibition (Figs. 1,2). In treated cells, cell doubling time is extended and rosemary extract may interfere with cell cycle progression and postpone cell growth. This result is consistent with previous studies, which have shown rosemary extract induced perturbation of cell cycle progression in human ovarian cancer cells6. Although growth delay was not BRCA2 deficiency dependent, clonogenic assay showed stronger cytotoxicity was induced by rosemary extract in BRCA2 deficient cells. However, due to the relatively weak PARP inhibitory effect, the ratio of IC50 for rosemary extract induced cytotoxicity between wild type BRCA2 cells and BRCA2 deficient cells was not as large as known selective PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib (Figs 1A and 5E)18. This ratio was relatively small and comparative to the natural flavonoids with PARP inhibitory effects14. Human cell line experiment data added extra support for BRCA2 deficiency dependent cytotoxicity by rosemary extract (Fig. 1C).

Rosemary extract contains many chemicals and several major chemical compounds including, carnosic acid, gallic acid, carnosol, and rosmarinic acid. These four chemicals were used in this study to further identify active PARP inhibitors. All tested chemicals showed in vitro PARP inhibitory effects. Carnosol, carnosic acid, and gallic acid showed in vivo PARP inhibitory effects; however, only carnosic acid and gallic acid showed significant cell killing in BRCA2 deficient cells (Fig. 5A–B). Previous studies have observed rosemary extract to reduce proliferation through Akt and other downstream pathways which can lead to apoptosis of the cell19,20. Our findings added rosemary extract for a novel cytotoxicity pathway by PARP inhibition and synthetic lethality.

Individual chemicals in rosemary extract have also been previously studied. Especially, the ability of carnosic acid and gallic acid to downregulate the Akt pathway resulting in apoptosis21,22,23. These chemicals were identified in our experimentation to contain strong PARP inhibitory effects and displayed synthetic lethality in BRCA2 deficient cells. Conversely, rosmarinic acid did not show synthetic lethality in BRCA2 deficient cells and had minimum inhibitory activity against PARP. On the other hand, carnosol had similar PARP inhibitory capacity, but showed no synthetic lethality in BRCA2 deficient cells. This observation can likely be explained by other dominant cytotoxic pathways such as antagonistic binding. Carnosol is a receptor antagonist which binds in the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor and estrogen receptor-alpha24. The IC50 of cellular growth was reported as 25.6 µM in the breast cancer cell line MCF-724. Carnosol has also showed wild type p53 dependent anti-proliferation effect in glioblastoma cells25. Carnosol induces apoptosis through down regulation of Bcl-226. It is also known that carnosol is one of the strongest active biomolecules in rosemary extract; therefore, we assumed that the PARP inhibition induced synthetic lethality effects were not visible because of death signals from other pathways. Furthermore, our results suggested that rosemary extract may have a different mechanism of cytotoxicity other than PARP inhibition.

The bioavailablity of rosemary extract and important chemicals in rosemary have also been reported. Bioavailiability of drugs is a key factor to study before the standardization of preventative and chemotherapy treatments. Previous studies have shown that the bioavailablity of carnosic acid was 40% after oral injection in rats27, and 36–39% for gallic acid and is analog in the blood stream after oral ingestion in humans28. The bioavailability information for carnosol is unknown or limited. According to Vaquero’s pharmacokinetic parameters data, after oral administration of 100 mg of rosemary extract, the Tmax and Cmax of carnosol were 13.3 hours and 18.2 µM. However, the Tmax and Cmax values of carnosic acid, were 0.4 hours and 26.6 µM respectively29. The high bioavailability suggests that taking rosemary extract itself or purified carnosic acid or gallic acid as supplements can affect BRCA2 mutated cells in the body. It was clear that synthetic lethality induced by both rosemary extract and its chemicals were comparable to NU1025 but much lower than actual PARP inhibitor drugs, such as olaparib (Fig. 5). However, intake of rosemary extract and its chemicals can be easily increased in daily food additives and health supplements with relatively low cost. Rosemary extract is a known antioxidant and radical scavenger3,30,31,32,33: by combining these properties, it may be possible to show chemopreventive effects against BRCA2 deficient tumors in the individuals with BRCA2 heterozygous mutation by taking a low dose intake of rosemary chemicals daily.

In conclusion, this paper identified rosemary extract to contain PARP inhibitory activity and selective cell toxicity in BRCA2 deficient cells through synthetic lethality. This study also identified the main compounds in rosemary extract that act as PARP inhibitors which are proposed to be carnosic acid and possibly gallic acid. Further research should be done to investigate in vivo synthetic lethality induced chemoprevention and the PARP inhibitory mechanisms of these chemicals.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Chinese Hamster lung cell (V79), BRCA2 deficient mutant of this cell line (V-C8), and gene corrected mutant cells were used for all cell based assays, which were generously provided by Dr. Joel Bedford (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO)34,35. Normal human fibroblast AG1522, human breast carcinoma cell line MCF7, lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549, and BRCA2 defective VU423F cells were kindly supplied by Oregon Health and Science University Cell Repository (Portland, Oregon), and obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Cells were maintained in culture in minimum essential medium alpha (MEMα, Gibco, Grand Island, NY), and supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin, and 0.1% fungizone solution (Gibco) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Chemicals

Rosemary extract was provided by CCI Corporation (Gifu, Japan). The rosemary extract contained 13.8% of carnosol, 9.5% of carnosic acid, and 0.7% of rosmarinic acid. It was dissolved in DMSO to make a 50 mg/ml stock solution and stored at −20 °C. Carnosic acid, carnosol, gallic acid, and rosmarinic acid were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO). NU1025 and olaparib were obtained by Calbiochem (San Diego, CA).

Doubling time assay

Ten thousand trypsinized cells were plated into 12-well cell culture plate. Cells were treated with various concentrations of rosemary extract after 2 hours of incubation. Cell numbers were counted by Coulter Counter Z1 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) after 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours of drug treatment. Cell doubling time were calculated through GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad software, Inc. La Jolla, CA).

Cell survival assay

Exponentially growing cell cultures were trypsinized and approximately 300 cells were placed in cell culture dishes. Two hours after cells were seeded, the tested chemicals were added to the plates. Cells were incubated for 7–10 days to form colonies. Afterwards, cells were fixed with 100% ethanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet, then manually counted. Colonies having more than 50 cells were considered to be a survivor.

In vitro PARP activity Inhibition

HT Universal Colorimetric PARP Assay Kit (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD) was used to assess the capacity of rosemary extract as a PARP inhibitor. Solutions were prepared per directions provided with the kit from the manufacturer and 3-Aminobenzamide(3-AB) was used as a known PARP inhibitor. The histone coated strip wells were rehydrated and 5 µl of the desired dilutions of testing compounds and 7.5 µl of PARP enzyme (0.5 Unit/well) solution were added. This sat at room temperature for 10 minutes before the addition of 12.5 µl PARP cocktail. The wells were left at room temperature for 1 hour before washing toughly with PBS and PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100. After washing, 25 µl Strep-HRP was added to each well. Again, the wells sat at room temperature for 1 hour before repeating the washing process. After the wells were washed and dried, by patting on top of a paper towel, 50 µl of TACS-Sapphire was added and then wells were placed inside a drawer at room temperature for 15 minutes before adding 50 µl of 0.2 M HCl. The resulting absorbance at 450 nm was read with a Bio-rad benchmark Microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) prior to GraphPad Prism 7 analysis.

In vivo PARP activity inhibition

Exponentially growing V79 cells were treated with chemicals for 30 minutes before exposed to 2 mM hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes. After hydrogen peroxide treatment, cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes, followed by permeabilization in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS solution for 10 minutes. After blocking with 10% goat serum in PBS, anti-poly (ADP ribose) mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500 dilution in 10% goat serum) was added to the cells for incubation at 37 °C for 1 hour. Alexa 488 conjugated anti-mouse goat antibody (1:500 dilution in 10% goat serum) was used for the secondary antibody. After DNA staining with DAPI in SlowFade (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), fluorescence images were obtained by Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope equipped with Q-imaging Aqua Cooled CCD monochrome camera with Q-capture Pro software (Q-imaging, Surrey BC, Canada). Poly (ADP-ribose) formation observed as green fluorescence signals was quantified with Metamorph software. Green pixels per cell was scored for a minimum of 30 cells.

Synthetic lethality DNA damage formation

Exponentially growing V79, V-C8, and gene corrected cells were exposed to 20 µg/ml of rosemary extract solution overnight. After treatment, cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes followed by permeabilization in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS solution for 10 minutes. After blocking with 10% goat serum in PBS, Anti-gamma-H2AX mouse monoclonal antibody (1:300 dilution in 10% goat serum) was added to the cells for incubation at 37 °C for 1 hour. Alexa 488 conjugated anti-mouse goat antibody (1:500 dilution in 10% goat serum) was used for the secondary antibody. After DNA staining with DAPI in slowfade, 1 µm slices of fluorescence images were obtained by motorized Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope equipped with CoolSNAP HQ2 Cooled CCD monochrome camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) with Metamorph (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) to obtain extended focus images. Massive DNA damage was categorized as more than 5 gamma-H2AX foci per cell.

Statistics

A minimum of three independent experiments were carried out, consequent data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 software. The data is presented as the mean ± standard error of the means. IC50 values (50% inhibitory concentration doses of the specific endpoints) were derived by fitting dose response curves using a sigmoidal dose response equation obtained by GraphPad Prism. Differences with a P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, statistical comparison of mean values was performed using two-way ANOVA test with multiple comparisons.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Martinez, A. L., Gonzalez-Trujano, M. E., Chavez, M. & Pellicer, F. Antinociceptive effectiveness of triterpenes from rosemary in visceral nociception. J Ethnopharmacol 142, 28–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.052 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Singletary, K. W. & Nelshoppen, J. M. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumorigenesis and of in vivo formation of mammary DMBA-DNA adducts by rosemary extract. Cancer Lett 60, 169–175 (1991).

  3. 3.

    Minnunni, M., Wolleb, U., Mueller, O., Pfeifer, A. & Aeschbacher, H. U. Natural antioxidants as inhibitors of oxygen species induced mutagenicity. Mutat Res 269, 193–200 (1992).

  4. 4.

    Tawfiq, N. et al. Induction of the anti-carcinogenic enzyme quinone reductase by food extracts using murine hepatoma cells. European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation 3, 285–292 (1994).

  5. 5.

    Cheung, S. & Tai, J. Anti-proliferative and antioxidant properties of rosemary Rosmarinus officinalis. Oncol Rep 17, 1525–1531 (2007).

  6. 6.

    Tai, J., Cheung, S., Wu, M. & Hasman, D. Antiproliferation effect of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) on human ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Phytomedicine 19, 436–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2011.12.012 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Yesil-Celiktas, O., Sevimli, C., Bedir, E. & Vardar-Sukan, F. Inhibitory effects of rosemary extracts, carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid on the growth of various human cancer cell lines. Plant foods for human nutrition 65, 158–163, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-010-0166-4 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Kida, K., Murai, M. & Yamauchi, H. [Diagnosis and Treatment of HBOC Syndrome by a Breast Surgical Oncologist]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 44, 111–115 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Wooster, R. et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378, 789–792, https://doi.org/10.1038/378789a0 (1995).

  10. 10.

    Fodor, F. H. et al. Frequency and carrier risk associated with common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients. Am J Hum Genet 63, 45-51, S0002-9297(07)60743-5 [pii]10.1086/301903 (1998).

  11. 11.

    Bryant, H. E. et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434, 913–917, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03443 (2005).

  12. 12.

    Helleday, T. The underlying mechanism for the PARP and BRCA synthetic lethality: clearing up the misunderstandings. Mol Oncol 5, 387–393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.001 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Mena, P. et al. Phytochemical Profiling of Flavonoids, Phenolic Acids, Terpenoids, and Volatile Fraction of a Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) Extract. Molecules 21, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111576 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Maeda, J. et al. Natural and glucosyl flavonoids inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity and induce synthetic lethality in BRCA mutant cells. Oncol Rep 31, 551–556, https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2902 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Su, C., Haskins, A. H., Omata, C., Aizawa, Y. & Kato, T. A. PARP Inhibition by Flavonoids Induced Selective Cell Killing to BRCA2-Deficient Cells. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph10040080 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Ellisen, L. W. PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy: promise, progress, and puzzles. Cancer Cell 19, 165–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.047 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Weil, M. K. & Chen, A. P. PARP inhibitor treatment in ovarian and breast cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 35, 7–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2010.12.002 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Bryant, H. E. & Helleday, T. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activates ATM which is required for subsequent homologous recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Research 34, 1685–1691, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl108 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Moore, J., Megaly, M., MacNeil, A. J., Klentrou, P. & Tsiani, E. Rosemary extract reduces Akt/mTOR/p70S6K activation and inhibits proliferation and survival of A549 human lung cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother 83, 725–732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.07.043 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Moore, J., Yousef, M. & Tsiani, E. Anticancer Effects of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) Extract and Rosemary Extract Polyphenols. Nutrients 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8110731 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Kar, S., Palit, S., Ball, W. B. & Das, P. K. Carnosic acid modulates Akt/IKK/NF-kappaB signaling by PP2A and induces intrinsic and extrinsic pathway mediated apoptosis in human prostate carcinoma PC-3 cells. Apoptosis: an international journal on programmed cell death 17, 735–747, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-012-0715-4 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Chen, Y. J. et al. Gallic acid abolishes the EGFR/Src/Akt/Erk-mediated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Chemico-biological interactions 252, 131–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.04.025 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Chen, H. M. et al. Gallic acid, a major component of Toona sinensis leaf extracts, contains a ROS-mediated anti-cancer activity in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Lett 286, 161–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2009.05.040 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Johnson, J. J. et al. Disruption of androgen and estrogen receptor activity in prostate cancer by a novel dietary diterpene carnosol: implications for chemoprevention. Cancer prevention research 3, 1112–1123, https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0168 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Giacomelli, C. et al. New insights into the anticancer activity of carnosol: p53 reactivation in the U87MG human glioblastoma cell line. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 74, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.02.019 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Dorrie, J., Sapala, K. & Zunino, S. J. Carnosol-induced apoptosis and downregulation of Bcl-2 in B-lineage leukemia cells. Cancer Lett 170, 33–39 (2001).

  27. 27.

    Doolaege, E. H., Raes, K., De Vos, F., Verhe, R. & De Smet, S. Absorption, distribution and elimination of carnosic acid, a natural antioxidant from Rosmarinus officinalis, in rats. Plant foods for human nutrition 66, 196–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-011-0233-5 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Shahrzad, S., Aoyagi, K., Winter, A., Koyama, A. & Bitsch, I. Pharmacokinetics of gallic acid and its relative bioavailability from tea in healthy humans. J Nutr 131, 1207–1210 (2001).

  29. 29.

    Romo Vaquero, M. et al. Bioavailability of the major bioactive diterpenoids in a rosemary extract: metabolic profile in the intestine, liver, plasma, and brain of Zucker rats. Mol Nutr Food Res 57, 1834–1846, https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201300052 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Zhao, B. L., Li, X. J., He, R. G., Cheng, S. J. & Xin, W. J. Scavenging effect of extracts of green tea and natural antioxidants on active oxygen radicals. Cell biophysics 14, 175–185 (1989).

  31. 31.

    Kim, S. J., Han, D., Moon, K. D. & Rhee, J. S. Measurement of superoxide dismutase-like activity of natural antioxidants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59, 822–826, https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.59.822 (1995).

  32. 32.

    Aruoma, O. I. et al. An evaluation of the antioxidant and antiviral action of extracts of rosemary and Provencal herbs. Food Chem Toxicol 34, 449–456 (1996).

  33. 33.

    Aruoma, O. I. Antioxidant actions of plant foods: use of oxidative DNA damage as a tool for studying antioxidant efficacy. Free radical research 30, 419–427 (1999).

  34. 34.

    Verhaegh, G. W. et al. A novel type of X-ray-sensitive Chinese hamster cell mutant with radioresistant DNA synthesis and hampered DNA double-strand break repair. Mutation Research 337, 119–129 (1995).

  35. 35.

    Zdzienicka, M. Z. & Simons, J. W. Mutagen-sensitive cell lines are obtained with a high frequency in V79 Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 178, 235–244 (1987).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partially funded by Dr. Akiko Ueno Radiobiology Research Fund (TAK) and the joint research fund of Gifu University (KM).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA

    • Cathy Su
    • , Jeffrey P. Gius
    • , Julia Van Steenberg
    • , Alexis H. Haskins
    • , Chisato Omata
    •  & Takamitsu A. Kato
  2. Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, United Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, 1–1, Yanagido Gifu, 501–1193, Japan

    • Kazuki Heishima
    • , Masahiro Iwayama
    • , Mami Murakami
    • , Takashi Mori
    •  & Kohji Maruo

Authors

  1. Search for Cathy Su in:

  2. Search for Jeffrey P. Gius in:

  3. Search for Julia Van Steenberg in:

  4. Search for Alexis H. Haskins in:

  5. Search for Kazuki Heishima in:

  6. Search for Chisato Omata in:

  7. Search for Masahiro Iwayama in:

  8. Search for Mami Murakami in:

  9. Search for Takashi Mori in:

  10. Search for Kohji Maruo in:

  11. Search for Takamitsu A. Kato in:

Contributions

T.A.K. conceived and designed the experiment. C.S., J.P.G., J.V.S., T.A.K. wrote the manuscript and performed experiment and data analysis. A.H.H., K.H., C.O. performed experiment and data analysis. M.I., M.M., T.K., K.M. performed data analysis and interpretation and critical revision of the article. All authors approved final version of manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takamitsu A. Kato.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.