Abstract
Strontium (Sr) has been described as having beneficial influence in bone strength and architecture. However, negative systemic effects have been reported on oral administration of Sr ranelate, leading to strict restrictions in clinical application. We hypothesized that local delivery of Sr improves osteogenesis without eliciting detrimental side effects. Therefore, the in vivo response to an injectable Sr-hybrid system composed of RGD-alginate hydrogel cross-linked in situ with Sr and reinforced with Sr-doped hydroxyapatite microspheres, was investigated. The system was injected in a critical-sized bone defect model and compared to a similar Sr-free material. Micro-CT results show a trend towards higher new bone formed in Sr-hybrid group and major histological differences were observed between groups. Higher cell invasion was detected at the center of the defect of Sr-hybrid group after 15 days with earlier bone formation. Higher material degradation with increase of collagen fibers and bone formation in the center of the defect after 60 days was observed as opposed to bone formation restricted to the periphery of the defect in the control. These histological findings support the evidence of an improved response with the Sr enriched material. Importantly, no alterations were observed in the Sr levels in systemic organs or serum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The management of fractures and bone defects remains a significant challenge, and there is the need for improved therapeutic strategies1. Biological (autografts, allografts and xenografts) and synthetic bone grafts are currently used in clinical practice for bone repair. Because of their osteogenic potential and the absence of risks of immune rejection or disease transfer, autografts are clinically preferred. However, they are limited in supply, imply the additional morbidity of a harvest surgery and their properties and shape do not match exactly those of the bone to be replaced2. Intensive investigation is being carried out to produce synthetic bone grafts in order to overcome these problems. The use of injectable materials in bone regeneration, especially calcium phosphate based materials, presents several advantages, namely due to their adequate biological responses, osteoconductivity and mechanical properties3,4,5,6. These materials can be applied by minimally invasive surgical procedures, to efficiently fill-in cavities of non-uniform shapes, with no tissue damage and limited exposure to infectious agents, thus reducing patient discomfort and procedure-associated health costs. The addition of osteoinductive factors or osteoprogenitor/stem cells may improve bone repair, particularly in osteoporotic conditions, characterized by an impaired healing response7,8,9,10.
Oral administration of Strontium (Sr) ranelate has shown effectiveness in the prevention of both vertebral and non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures11, 12. Unlike other anti-osteoporotic agents widely used in clinical practice, such as bisphosphonates, estrogen, selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) and calcitonin, which inhibit bone resorption9, Sr ranelate also promotes bone formation13,14,15,16. Several in vitro studies show that Sr ranelate decreases bone resorption, by reducing osteoclast activity13, 14, 17, decreasing functional osteoclast markers expression13, disrupting osteoclasts cytoskeleton14, and increasing osteoclast apoptosis18. Simultaneously, it induces positive effects on osteoblastogenesis and osteoblast activity in different in vitro models19, namely by enhancing replication of preosteoblastic cells14, 20,21,22,23, increasing osteogenesis14, 20, 24,25,26, decreasing osteoblast apoptosis21, 27, and promoting terminal differentiation of osteoblasts into osteocytes20. Some pre-clinical studies performed in both normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic animal models confirmed these in vitro results, showing the beneficial effects of Sr ranelate on bone formation and remodeling28,29,30,31,32. Despite these important effects, cardiovascular safety of orally administered Sr ranelate has been questioned due to a small but significant increase in non-fatal myocardial infarctions12, 33, 34. Currently, there are strict indications and restrictions to its use12.
Nevertheless, Sr incorporation into biomaterials for bone regeneration may improve their regeneration potential. In vivo studies showed that doping calcium phosphate cements and other ceramics with Sr promotes bone repair35,36,37. A sustained delivery system for local release of Sr ions can obviate systemic complications with similar rates of bone formation at the site of implantation.
Current injectable bone defect methacrylate-based fillers have compression strengths much higher than that of cancellous bone, and the brittleness of calcium phosphate cements is a limitation38, 39. We have previously developed various types of injectable biomaterials for bone regeneration, namely calcium phosphate40,41,42 and calcium phosphate/alginate43 microspheres, as well as different types of bio-functional alginate hydrogels44,45,46,47. When combined, alginate can act as an appropriate vehicle for ceramic microspheres delivery and immobilization at the injury site. Alginate is a natural linear polysaccharide, biodegradable and biocompatible, extensively studied for biomedical applications48, 49. Although generally regarded as a bioinert material, since it does not elicit specific cell-matrix interactions, grafting of alginate with arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides is an effective strategy to provide appropriate guidance signals to promote cell adhesion and facilitate cell colonization50. Alginate forms hydrogels under mild chemical conditions, in the presence of divalent cations, such as calcium (Ca) and Sr, through a cytocompatible physical gelation process. These cations bind homoguluronic blocks in adjacent alginate chains in a cooperative manner (egg-box model) producing a crosslinked hydrogel network51, 52.
Recently, we developed an injectable hybrid system that consists of ~500 µm diameter hydroxyapatite (HAp) microspheres doped with Sr, embedded in a functionalized alginate matrix crosslinked in situ with Sr53. As a vehicle for the microspheres delivery, functionalized alginate with RGD peptides was used, providing a scaffold for cell adhesion and migration and allowing for the injectability of the system. However, the use of hydrogels in bone tissue engineering is limited by low mechanical properties and the non-applicability in load-bearing conditions54. The packing of the microspheres upon delivery raises the compression strength of the material53, and alginate creates an interconnected 3D network adequate for the invasion of blood vessels and cells55. Moreover, the presence of Sr in both components of the system provides two different release routes upon degradation of the materials. This system presents a clinically relevant compromise between adequate injectability, gelation time and final compression strength53. Moreover, in vitro studies showed that this Sr-hybrid scaffold promotes sustained release of Sr2+, supports human mesenchymal stem cells adhesion, survival and osteogenic differentiation, and inhibits osteoclasts differentiation and activity, as compared to a similar Sr-free system56.
In the current study we aim to evaluate the in vivo response to the designed Sr-rich hybrid system and its influence on new bone formation using a rat metaphyseal femoral critical-sized defect model, compared to a similar Sr-free material. The proposed system is expected to provide an adequate therapeutic approach to fill-in bone defects by minimally invasive surgery, while acting as a scaffold for local Sr2+ release to promote bone regeneration.
Results
Radiographical analysis of bone and biomaterial
A cylindrical defect with 3 mm diameter and depth of approximately 4 mm was drilled in the lateral condyle of the right femur (Fig. 1A). The defect was filled with the biomaterial, injected using a 1 mL syringe (Fig. 1B,C). A picture of the Sr-hybrid material used is shown in Fig. 1D, where spherical particles (Sr-HAp microspheres) are embedded within a transparent hydrogel (Sr crosslinked RGD-alginate).
Rat femurs were imaged by X-ray along the experimental period allowing for a follow-up at 15 and 30 days. Representative images of defects filled with materials (Sr-hybrid and Ca-hybrid) or empty defects are shown in Fig. 2. In hybrid-filled defects (Fig. 2A to D), microspheres are located inside the created bone defect (arrows in the images), where the higher radiopacity of the HAp microspheres allowed for the easy monitoring using X-ray. Microspheres were homogeneously distributed within the defects (Fig. 2A to D) and were still detected at day 30, a non-invasive mid-term follow-up (Fig. 2B and D). Empty defects were also imaged (Fig. 2E and F) and the defect could still be observed after 30 days, confirming it to be of a critical size.
Micro-CT morphometric 3D evaluation
Micro-CT analysis was performed 60 days post-implantation (Fig. 3) to evaluate new bone formation at the defect site and to assess the spatial distribution of ceramic microspheres within the lesion. In Sr-hybrid filled defects (Fig. 3A), microspheres were homogeneously distributed inside the defect with no apparent degradation, with preserved size and without modifications in shape. Similar results were found in Ca-hybrid filled defects. Furthermore, and particularly in Sr-hybrid samples, centripetal bone colonization could be observed by new bone formation surrounding the ceramic microspheres and with the development of new bone trabeculae in the periphery of the defect. 3D morphometric analysis was performed using five femurs per group, where the ROI was defined in binary images (Fig. 3B) and the percentage of new bone formed (bone volume fraction, BV/TV) was calculated. Values of (31.5 ± 1.7) % and (28.6 ± 1.1) % (BV/TV (%), mean ± SE) of new bone was measured in animals that received the Sr-hybrid and Ca-hybrid materials, respectively (Fig. 3C).
Histological evaluation of bone/biomaterial interface
In Fig. 4A representative images of femurs with defects filled with Sr-hybrid or Ca-hybrid materials, at days 15 and 60, are portrayed. A global view of the defects and materials (Fig. 4Aa to d), as well as a more detailed view of the periphery of the defect (Fig. 4Aa’ to d’ and magnifications a” to d”), are given. Histological analysis at day 15 post-implantation showed that the created defects exhibited similar diameter and were filled with approximately 15 to 18 microspheres (Fig. 4Aa,b). As early as 15 days post-implantation, all animals showed, to some extent, newly formed bone at the periphery of the defect (Fig. 4Aa’,b’). Sr-hybrid implanted defects also showed new bone formation in close contact with the microspheres, distant from the periphery of native bone (Fig. 4Ab”, arrow). SEM images and EDS analysis of this newly formed bone in close vicinity of the microspheres is shown in Fig. 4B. The results confirmed the high content of calcium and phosphate, and a Ca/P ratio in accordance with normal bone composition (Z1 in Fig. 4B), and different from the elemental analysis of the microspheres (Z2 in Fig. 4B), where Sr was also identified.
After 60 days, new bone formation at the periphery was observed in both materials. Sr-hybrid implanted defects exhibited a thicker trabecular bone structure at the periphery of the defect (Fig. 4Ad’,d”), when compared to the Ca-hybrid group (Fig. 4Ac’,c”). The quantification of new bone formed at the periphery of the defect revealed a statistically significant thicker bone structure in Sr-hybrid group (662.4 ± 48 µm) in contrast to a thinner bone formation (381.1 ± 29 µm) in the Ca-hybrid group (mean ± SE, p < 0.001, Fig. 4C).
Histological evaluation of the center of the defect
Representative images of the center of the defect in both groups are shown in Fig. 5A. Although no evident differences were observed in the diameter of the microspheres with time of implantation, alginate showed different behavior between groups. After 15 days, some alginate was observed surrounding microspheres in both experimental groups (Fig. 5Aa and b). In Sr-hybrid group, higher cell invasion at the center was observed, mainly of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) (Fig. 5Ab and b’).
After 60 days, alginate was still present in both groups (Fig. 5Ac and d), although higher degradation was observed in Sr-hybrid filled defects. A statistically significant decrease in the area of residual material (alginate + microspheres) present on the defect site was observed in Sr-hybrid group with an area of 1.77 ± 0.2 × 105 µm2 compared to 3.14 ± 0.1 × 105 µm2 in Ca-hybrid group (mean ± SE, p < 0.001, Fig. 5B). In a detailed microscopic analysis of the center of the Sr-hybrid filled defects (Fig. 5Ad and d’) granulation tissue could be observed, with the presence of blood vessels (Fig. 5Ad’) and osteoclasts (Fig. 5Cb). In contrast, in Ca-hybrid group osteoclasts were found only at the periphery of the defect (Fig. 5Ca). Furthermore, PSR staining images under conventional light (Fig. 6Aa and c) showed the presence of collagen (in red) within the area of the defect in Sr-hybrid (Fig. 6Ac) at a higher extent than in Ca-hybrid filled defect after 60 days (Fig. 6Aa). The use of PSR-polarization method (Fig. 6Ab and d) allowed for the quantification of different types of collagen fibrils, i.e. green and red, which are associated with thin/immature/type III and thick/mature/type I collagen, respectively. The quantification was performed within the central area of the defect using a fixed ROI (diameter = 2.4 mm, yellow circle in Fig. 6Ab and d) and results are shown in Fig. 6B. As expected, an increase in the percentage of red/type I collagen was observed from day 15 to day 60 in both groups. However, 60 days post-implantation, a slightly higher percentage of red/type I collagen was measured in the central defect region in Sr-hybrid group ((3.3 ± 1.3) %, mean ± SE) compared to Ca-hybrid group ((1.9 ± 0.3) %, mean ± SE).
Evaluation of Sr systemic effect
Sr levels were quantified in serum (Fig. 7A) and organs (Fig. 7B) associated with excretory/filtration functions, such as liver, spleen and kidneys, by ICP-AES analysis, to evaluate the safety of the designed Sr-hybrid system. The Sr levels in serum of animals that were subjected to Sr-hybrid implantation (27.05 ± 2.7 µg/L after 15 days and 20.61 ± 1.3 µg/L after 60 days) were not statistically different from those in empty defect animals (27.26 ± 3.9 µg/L after 15 days and 23.31 ± 1.9 µg/L after 60 days) or non-operated animals (28.59 ± 0.8 µg/L, mean ± SD). Even after 60 days of implantation, no increase in Sr was found in serum (Limit of quantification, LOQ – 5 μg/L).
Sr quantification in organs at 60 days post-implantation supports results from measurements in serum. No statistical significant differences were observed between empty defect animals (0.44 ± 0.1 µg/g kidney, 0.50 ± 0.1 µg/g spleen, 0.48 ± 0.3 µg/g liver, mean ± SD) and Sr-hybrid group (0.69 ± 0.3 µg/g kidney, 0.59 ± 0.2 µg/g spleen, 0.36 ± 0.1 µg/g liver, mean ± SD). Moreover, histomorphological analyses were also performed in histological sections of organs after 60 days (Fig. 7C). In Sr-hybrid implanted group no morphological alterations at macro or microscopic level were observed, when compared to non-operated animals. Analysis of Ca-hybrid group presented similar results, with no alterations observed.
Discussion
In this study the in vivo response to an injectable Sr-rich hybrid system, composed of Sr-doped HAp microspheres embedded in an Sr-crosslinked RGD-alginate hydrogel, as compared to a similar Sr-free system (Ca-hybrid material), using a rat metaphyseal femoral critical-sized defect model, is presented.
The designed hybrid system aims at providing adequate mechanical support in the early phases of bone formation and gradual replacement of the artificial scaffold by newly-formed bone with adequate function and mechanical properties. The use of hydrogels is a promising approach in skeletal regenerative medicine49, 57,58,59. Alginate has been used due to its biocompatibility, low toxicity, and mild gelation in the presence of divalent cations. Therefore alginate gels act as a natural extracellular matrix mimic which can be tuned to deliver bioactive agents and cells to the desired site, creating space for new tissue formation and control the structure and function of the engineered tissue49. Other works have incorporated alginate in self-setting cements, for improving injectability, cohesion and compression strength60,61,62. In the present study, the ability of alginate to form hydrogels in situ acting as a carrier for HAp microspheres under cytocompatible conditions, was explored. In agreement with our previous results53, the system showed to be adequate for minimally invasive implantation. A conventional syringe can be used to manually inject the material, perfectly filling complex defects and, once set, creating a 3D matrix with homogeneous distribution of microspheres. Furthermore, alginate was modified with RGD peptides to provide biological cues for promoting cell adhesion and colonization50, 63. The main disadvantage regarding load-bearing application is alginate low mechanical properties which can be overcome through the reinforcement with ceramic components, application in non load-bearing areas, and the concomitant use of fixation devices54. With an alginate-to-microspheres weight ratio of 0.35, and microspheres with average diameter of 530 µm, the hybrid system allows for a good compromise between mechanical resistance and adequate space between particles (approximately 220 μm), which is expected to facilitate in situ cell colonization and invasion by blood vessels53, 55.
Deficient bone healing is expected to occur, especially in osteoporotic conditions. The use of crystalline HAp in the microspheres, with low degradation rate, ensures its permanency at the injury site for longer periods post-implantation, therefore allowing for a mechanical reinforcement of the defect. In this work, the high radiopacity of microspheres allowed for an easy follow-up in vivo of the material using conventional radiological imaging. In clinical practice, this comes as highly advantageous since regular X-rays are required to assess bone healing.
In this system we used alginate crosslinked by internal gelation with Sr2+ as a vehicle for the Sr-doped HAp microspheres. Sr was incorporated both in the hydrogel and the microspheres, which present different release kinetic profiles resulting in sustained Sr2+ release for long periods of time (AH Lourenço et al., unpublished results). In other in vivo studies, Sr has been found to enhance bone formation35, 37, 64, 65. For example, Banerjee et al. studied the effect of doping β-TCP with MgO/SrO on bone formation in Sprague-Dawley rats64. Doped β-TCP promoted more osteogenesis and faster bone formation than pure β-TCP. In critical calvaria defects of an ovariectomized rat model, macroporous Sr-substituted scaffolds showed superior osteoinductive activity to enhance early bone formation, and could also stimulate angiogenesis compared with calcium silicate scaffolds65. The current study showed that Sr-hybrid system presents bioactive properties, promoting cell migration, implant vascularization and supports bone ingrowth. Newly formed bone developed in close contact with the material, without any fibrous interface, growing in a centripetal manner, in continuity with the surrounding host trabecular bone, indicates a good integration with the host tissue. Newly formed bone percentages is in agreement to those observed in other works testing similar materials66, 67 and a trend towards greater new bone formation was observed in Sr-hybrid filled defects.
Major histological differences were observed between the two groups. Higher cell invasion was seen at the center of the Sr-hybrid filled defects at 15 days post-implantation, with the presence of PMN. Bone injury elicits an inflammatory response that is beneficial to healing when acute and highly regulated. Inflammatory cells are recruited to the site of injury for clearance of pathogens and maintenance of bone homeostasis68. This higher cell invasion correlates with higher material degradation and bone tissue formation seen after 60 days. We may assume that Sr induces faster bone healing, possibly due to a faster resolution of inflammation, tissue repair and remodeling. This can be appealing since the presence of Sr may be modulating the inflammatory response, a current trend in bone regeneration strategies regarding the development of biomaterials69,70,71.
Earlier bone formation was identified in close contact with the microspheres in Sr-hybrid system, highlighting higher osteoinductivity when compared to Ca-hybrid system which was evidenced by the thicker trabecular bone structure at the periphery of the defect observed in Sr-hybrid group 60 days post-implantation. Cardemill et al. have also found major differences in the topological distribution of the formed bone in association with Sr-doped calcium phosphate or HAp granules, although both materials showed comparable overall bone formation, when implanted in ovariectomized and non-ovariectomized rats72. A larger amount of mineralized bone was observed in the center of the defect in HAp group, mainly in ovariectomized rats, whereas at the periphery of the defect the bone area was higher using Sr-doped granules, irrespective of ovariectomy.
Granulation tissue with blood vessels and increased collagen deposition were observed at 60 days post-implantation in Sr-hybrid filled defects. Several studies have correlated the color of birefringent collagen fibers under polarized light with different collagen types73, 74. Our results show an increase in thicker red collagen fibers in Sr-hybrid group. These fibers are associated with type I collagen, the main type found in bone tissue. It has been shown that the incorporation of Sr in biomaterials may decrease the number of osteoclasts significantly, but these were nevertheless closely associated with newly formed trabeculae, indicating activated bone remodeling75. A quantitative analysis of TRAP positive cells was not performed. However, the presence of osteoclasts in the center of the defect supports the higher bone remodeling found in the Sr-hybrid group. Although the micro-CT calculations did not reveal a statistically different bone volume, these histological findings sustain the evidence of an improved response with the Sr enriched material.
The use of methylmethacrylate embedding histological technique allowed for the study of both bone and material without decalcification. The technique was optimized in our lab76 using an exothermic process. One of the disadvantages of the procedure is the inability to perform immunohistochemistry studies due to loss of antigenicity, which is worth exploring in future works.
With the use of Sr releasing systems, cardiovascular safety is of concern. Current guidelines indicate that orally administered Sr ranelate should be avoided in patients with past or present history of ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease and/or cerebrovascular disease or uncontrolled hypertension, due to an observed increase of cardiovascular events12. Although previous reports have shown that ionic Sr can be added to calcium phosphates and ceramics, potentially stimulating bone formation locally, the risk of systemic adverse effects has been rarely reported. Baier et al. studied the addition of Sr to calcium-phosphate cement in a distal methaphyseal femoral defect in ovariectomized rat model. Results have shown faster osteointegration of the implant with the addition of Sr, and Sr serum concentrations of 10.87 ± 4.16 μg/l were found 1 month post-implantation35. The systemic Sr levels were very low when compared to those found upon oral Sr ranelate treatment77. In the present study, Sr concentration was assessed both in the serum and organs with excretory/filtration functions, as well as the histology of these organs. Serum Sr concentration in operated animals was found to be similar to non-operated and in the same range as previously reported35. No statistically significant difference was observed between Sr-hybrid implanted and empty defects, both in serum and organs. Similarly, Sr concentration levels do not seem to be increased compared to normal levels found in the liver of Wistar rats (~0.2 ug/g of dry weight78). These results, together with the absence of morphological changes in histological sections of the organs suggest that Sr release is restricted to the defect site, corroborating the safety of this osteoinductive hybrid system.
Conclusions
We evaluated the in vivo response of an injectable Sr-rich hybrid system composed of Sr-doped HAp microspheres embedded in Sr-crosslinked RGD-alginate hydrogel intended for bone regeneration. Sr-hybrid system led to an increased bone formation in both center and periphery of a critical-sized defect compared to a non Sr–doped similar system, where new bone formation was restricted to the periphery. Besides promoting earlier new bone formation, Sr-hybrid system was also found to stimulate higher cell colonization with increased deposition of thick collagen fibers in the center of the defect. Importantly, our results suggest that only local release of Sr from the material was obtained, since no statistically significant differences on Sr concentration were detected in retrieved organs or serum. Together, these data demonstrate that the incorporation of Sr improved the osteoinductive properties of the hybrid system leading to higher bone regeneration without inducing detrimental side effects currently associated with other Sr-based therapeutic strategies. The Sr-hybrid material stands as a promising approach for bone regeneration strategies through minimally invasive procedures.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of the injectable hybrid materials
For the preparation of the hybrid system, RGD-alginate was combined with Sr-doped hydroxyapatite (HAp) or HAp microspheres and crosslinked by internal gelation with Sr or Ca carbonate, respectively (hereafter designated as Sr-hybrid or Ca-hybrid). These formulations and methodologies were adapted and optimized from previous works using Ca-crosslinked alginate hydrogels47, 48, 63, 79.
Ultra-pure (UP) LVG Alginate (Pronova FMC Biopolymers, G content ≥60%, MW 131 ± 13 kDa) was functionalized with RGD peptides as previously described63, filtered in 0.22 µm Steriflip units (Millipore), lyophilized and stored at −20 °C until further use. Endotoxin levels were measured in RGD-modified and non-modified UP alginate using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Endosafe™-PTS system (Charles River). The analysis was performed and certified by an external entity (Analytical Services Unit, IBET/ITQB) revealing endotoxin levels below 0.1 EU/mL (EU - unit of measurement for endotoxin activity), respecting the US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines for implantable devices.
Sterile RGD-Alginate was dissolved in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution under sterile conditions to yield a 4% (w/v) solution, which was thoroughly mixed with an aqueous suspension of SrCO3 (Sigma) or CaCO3 (Fluka) at SrCO3/COOH or CaCO3/COOH molar ratio of 1.6. A fresh solution of glucone delta-lactone (GDL, Sigma) was added to trigger gel formation at a final polymer concentration of 3.5% (w/v) and a carbonate/GDL molar ratio of 0.125.
HAp microspheres were prepared as described elsewhere42. Briefly, HAp powder (Plasma Biotal) was dispersed in a 3% (w/v) alginate solution (FMC Biopolymers) with a ceramic-to-polymer solution ratio of 0.25. The paste was extruded dropwise into 0.1 M SrCl2 (Merck) or 0.1 M CaCl2 (Merck) crosslinking solution, to produce Sr-HAp or HAp microspheres, respectively. Microspheres were allowed to reticulate for 30 min in the crosslinking solution, and were then washed in deionized water, dried and sintered at 1200 °C. Upon sintering, the polymer phase is burned out giving rise to a porous network where Sr or Ca ions are incorporated in the ceramic particles. Microspheres with spherical shape and diameter of 500–560 µm were retrieved by sieving and autoclave sterilized for further use. Sterile microspheres were promptly added to the gelling alginate solution to yield 35% in weight of the total mixture, thoroughly homogenized and placed in a 1 mL syringe (Terumo) ready for extrusion of the material.
Animal surgical procedure
All animal experiments were conducted following protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the Portuguese Official Authority on Animal Welfare and Experimentation (DGAV) – reference no. 0420/000/000/2012. We used a critical-sized metaphyseal bone defect model adapted from Le Guehennec et al.80, as previously described81. Three months old Wistar Han male rats (Charles River Laboratories) with weight ranging from 300 to 400 g were used. Two different experimental groups (n = 5 animals/group) were analysed: bone defect filled with Sr-hybrid material and bone defect filled with Ca-hybrid material (control material). Animals with empty defects (n = 5) were used as a critical-sized defect model control. Two different time-points were used, 15 days and 60 days, to evaluate the relationship of inflammation and early bone formation, and new bone formation, respectively. Non-operated animals (n = 2, 60 days) and animals with empty defects were used as control for serum Sr quantification and organ histological analysis. The analgesic buprenorphine (0.05 mg per kg), was administrated subcutaneously, 30 minutes before surgery. The animals were then subjected to volatile anesthesia with isofluorane, in a chamber, according to standard procedures of the animal facility (inducing anesthesia with 900 cc O2/min, 5% Isofluorane), confirmed by loss of posture and reflexes. Animals were then moved to a clean surgery area and anesthesia was maintained along all time of surgery with a face mask (300 cc O2/min, 2.5% Isofluorane). The right knee of each animal was shaved and skin cleaned and disinfected with 70% ethanol. A lateral incision was performed and both skin and muscles were retracted to expose the articular capsule. After arthrotomy, a cylindrical defect with 3 mm diameter and depth of approximately 4 mm was drilled in the anterolateral wall of the lateral condyle of the femur. The defect was washed with physiological saline solution and either filled with a biomaterial or left empty. All materials were prepared in sterile conditions and injected in the femur’s critical defect using a 1 mL syringe. Skin and muscle were sutured and the animal was placed back in its cage. Animals were observed until regaining consciousness. Post-operative care was carried out for 48 hours, where analgesics were given (Buprenorphine) in the same dose as before surgery, every 12 hours, with a subcutaneous injection. Behavior and wound healing were examined along time.
Sample collection
Fifteen and sixty days post-surgery animals were sacrificed. Animals were kept under volatile anesthesia (Isofluorane) and blood collection was performed by cardiac puncture. Pentobarbital (Eutasil) was administered for euthanizing animals, and femurs and organs (liver, left and right kidneys and spleen) were retrieved. Blood was centrifuged and serum collected and stored at −80 °C until further use. Femurs were cleaned from surrounding soft tissue and immediately placed in 10% (v/v) formalin neutral solution for 4 days, rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution and dehydrated in serial ethanol solutions (50–70%) for 3 days each. Femurs were maintained in 70% ethanol at 4 °C until further use. Organs were also placed in 10% (v/v) formalin solution for 24 h and further processed for paraffin embedding.
Radiographic analysis
Lateral X-ray of femurs retrieved from animals sacrificed at 15 days post-surgery were obtained using a radiographic system (Owandy). For the remaining animals, an in vivo lateral X-ray was also performed at 30 days post-surgery, to allow for a follow-up of defects and materials.
Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis
Bone defects and adjacent areas were analyzed using a high-resolution micro-CT (Skyscan 1072 scanner). Specimens (n = 5, 60 days post-implantation) were scanned in high resolution mode, using a pixel size of 19.13 μm and an integration time of 1.7 ms. The X-ray source was set at 91 keV of energy and 110 μA of current. A 1-mm-thick aluminum filter and a beam hardening correction algorithm were employed to minimize beam-hardening artefacts (SkyScan hardware/software).
For all scanned specimens, representative datasets of 1023 slices were used for morphometric analysis. To quantify new bone formation, a volume of interest (VOI), corresponding to the femoral defect volume, was delineated using CTAn software (Skyscan Ltd), to enable quantitative analysis to be performed. Binary images were created using two different thresholds, 50–255 (corresponding to particles and new bone) and 90–255 (just particles), and the respective TV (Total volume) determined. The difference between both TV corresponds to the volume of new bone formed (Bone volume, BV). Additionally, 3D virtual models were generated using an image processing software (ANT 3D Creator v 2.4, SkyScan). The micro-CT threshold was first calibrated from a backscattered image with primarily determined quantitative histological measurements, which was then applied equally to all samples.
Histological Analysis
Femurs were dehydrated in 100% ethanol for 3 days, at 4 °C, followed by immersion in xylol for 24 h and further embedding in methylmethacrylate and processed for histological analysis as described elsewhere76, 82.
Serial 7 µm coronal slides were retrieved and the intermediate region of the defect (1200–1500 µm) was stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), Masson’s Trichrome (MT), Picrosirius Red (PSR) and Tartarate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-light green (LG) staining. Briefly, for H&E, undeplastified sections were re-hydrated in deionized water and incubated in Gill’s Hematoxylin for 6 min and counterstained with alcoholic Eosin Y for 1 min. For MT staining, an MT kit (Sigma-Aldrich) was used according to manufacturer’s instructions in undeplastified sections. TRAP staining was performed according to manufacturer using a TRAP kit (Sigma) and counterstained with LG 0.1% (v/v) in deplastified section with xylol overnight. Sections were visualized under a light microscope (DP25, Olympus) and imaged. For PSR staining, sections were deplastified, hydrated in decreasing ethanol gradient to de-ionized water, stained for 6 min in Celestine blue and another 6 min in Gill’s Hematoxylin. After a 10 min washing step in water, sections were stained with Sirius Red for 1 h, washed with acidified water, dehydrated and mounted. Sections were imaged through polarization lens under a light microscope (Axiovert 200 M, Zeiss) using MosaiX software.
Regarding the retrieved organs, paraffin sections of 3 μm thickness were sequentially obtained and stained with H&E.
Peripheral bone thickness was determined as the average thickness of twenty different random locations (arrow in Fig. 4Ac” and d”) of bone found around the defect area using MT stained sections. AxioVision software was used for the measurements (n = 5 animals/group). The area of residual material found within the defect was measured by the same user, manually delimiting the area of the hybrid (microspheres and alginate) in MT stained sections. Alginate and microspheres retain staining and have a different texture, allowing for the easy identification of the material. MosaicJ (ImageJ software, n = 5 animals/group, 3 sections/animal) was used for the assembly of microscopic images at 20x magnification and area values were obtained in ImageJ.
Birefrigent green and red fibers were quantified as the percentage of thin/type III and thicker/type I collagen fibers, respectively73, 74. The collagen area within the central region of the defect (diameter = 2.4 mm) was quantified in ImageJ software (n = 5 animals/group, 3 images/animal). Sections were stained simultaneously and images acquired in the same day with the same parameters.
Serial 7 µm coronal slides were also analysed by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) using a High Resolution (Schottky) Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope with X-Ray Microanalysis and Electron Backscattered Diffraction analysis: Quanta 400 FEG ESEM/EDAX Genesis X4 M. Samples were coated with an Au/Pd thin film, by sputtering, using the SPI Module Sputter Coater equipment.
Systemic Sr quantification by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES)
Sr levels in serum and organs (spleen, liver and kidneys) were quantified by ICP-AES (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Ultima spectrometer, generator RF of 40,68 MHz). Serum samples (n = 6 samples/group/time point and n = 2 non-operated) were diluted 5 times in 1% Suprapur nitric acid (Fluka) as described elsewhere83. Spleen, liver and kidneys were digested in Suprapure nitric acid (n = 4 samples/group/time point). Before use, all glass materials were washed and then immersed in a 20% (v/v) nitric acid solution for at least 1 day in order to eliminate possible contaminations with Sr or other impurities from the vessels walls. Organs (~300 mg) were dried in a microwave (MARS-X 1500 W, CEM) configured with a 14 position carousel. An aliquot of 10 mL of Suprapur nitric acid was added and microwave digestion proceeded during 55 min, according to microwave digestion program (Supplementary - Table 1). The solutions were concentrated until 1 mL and preserved at −20 °C until Sr determination. The limit of detection (LOD – 1 μg/L) and limit of quantification (LOQ – 5 μg/L) for Sr were adequate for the expected concentration range of the samples.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric Mann–Whitney test with GraphPad Prism Program. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
References
Goldhahn, J. et al. Clinical evaluation of medicinal products for acceleration of fracture healing in patients with osteoporosis. Bone 43, 343–347, doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.017 (2008).
Campana, V. et al. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 25, 2445–2461, doi:10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 (2014).
Dupraz, A., Nguyen, T. P., Richard, M., Daculsi, G. & Passuti, N. Influence of a cellulosic ether carrier on the structure of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic particles in an injectable composite material. Biomaterials 20, 663–673, doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00222-1 (1999).
Iooss, P., Le Ray, A. M., Grimandi, G., Daculsi, G. & Merle, C. A new injectable bone substitute combining poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microparticles with biphasic calcium phosphate granules. Biomaterials., 2785–2794 (2001).
Larsson, S. Calcium Phosphates: What Is the Evidence? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 24, S41–S45, doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cec472 (2010).
Low, K. L. et al. Calcium phosphate-based composites as injectable bone substitute materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 94B, 273–286, doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31619 (2010).
Cao, L. et al. The use of autologous enriched bone marrow MSCs to enhance osteoporotic bone defect repair in long-term estrogen deficient goats. Biomaterials 33, 5076–5084, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.069 (2012).
Cho, S. W. et al. Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Cell Therapy Prevents Bone Loss in Ovariectomized Nude Mouse. Tissue Engineering Part A 18, 1067–1078, doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0355 (2012).
Liu, H.-Y. et al. The balance between adipogenesis and osteogenesis in bone regeneration by platelet-rich plasma for age-related osteoporosis. Biomaterials 32, 6773–6780, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.080 (2011).
Wang, Z. et al. Efficacy of bone marrow-derived stem cells in strengthening osteoporotic bone in a rabbit model. Tissue engineering., 1753–1761, doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.1753. (2006).
Meunier, P. J. et al. The Effects of Strontium Ranelate on the Risk of Vertebral Fracture in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. New England Journal of Medicine 350, 459–468, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022436 (2004).
Reginster, J. Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of currently marketed anti-osteoporosis medications. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 28, 809–834, doi:10.1016/j.beem.2014.09.003 (2014).
Baron, R. & Tsouderos, Y. In vitro effects of S12911-2 on osteoclast function and bone marrow macrophage differentiation. European Journal of Pharmacology 450, 11–17, doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02040-X (2002).
Bonnelye, E., Chabadel, A., Saltel, F. & Jurdic, P. Dual effect of strontium ranelate: Stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro. Bone 42, 129–138, doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043 (2008).
Grynpas, M. D. et al. Strontium increases vertebral bone volume in rats at a low dose that does not induce detectable mineralization defect. Bone 18, 253–259, doi:10.1016/8756-3282(95)00484-X (1996).
Yang, F. et al. Strontium Enhances Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and In Vivo Bone Formation by Activating Wnt/Catenin Signaling. STEM CELLS 29, 981–991, doi:10.1002/stem.646 (2011).
Takahashi, N., Sasaki, T., Tsouderos, Y. & Suda, T. S 12911-2 Inhibits Osteoclastic Bone Resorption In Vitro. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 18, 1082–1087, doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1082 (2003).
Hurtel-Lemaire, A. S. et al. The Calcium-sensing Receptor Is Involved in Strontium Ranelate-induced Osteoclast Apoptosis: New Insights Into The Associated Signaling Pathways. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 575–584, doi:10.1074/jbc.M801668200 (2009).
Marie, P. J., Felsenberg, D. & Brandi, M. L. How strontium ranelate, via opposite effects on bone resorption and formation, prevents osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International 22, 1659–1667, doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1369-0 (2011).
Atkins, G. J., Welldon, K. J., Halbout, P. & Findlay, D. M. Strontium ranelate treatment of human primary osteoblasts promotes an osteocyte-like phenotype while eliciting an osteoprotegerin response. Osteoporosis International 20, 653–664, doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0728-6 (2009).
Brennan, T. C. et al. Osteoblasts play key roles in the mechanisms of action of strontium ranelate. British Journal of Pharmacology 157, 1291–1300, doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00305.x (2009).
Caverzasio, J. Strontium ranelate promotes osteoblastic cell replication through at least two different mechanisms. Bone 42, 1131–1136, doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.02.010 (2008).
Chattopadhyay, N., Quinn, S. J., Kifor, O., Ye, C. & Brown, E. M. The calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) is involved in strontium ranelate-induced osteoblast proliferation. Biochemical Pharmacology 74, 438–447, doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.04.020 (2007).
Barbara, A., Delannoy, P., Denis, B. G. & Marie, P. J. Normal matrix mineralization induced by strontium ranelate in MC3T3-E1 osteogenic cells. Metabolism 53, 532–537, doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2003.10.022 (2004).
Choudhary, S., Halbout, P., Alander, C., Raisz, L. & Pilbeam, C. Strontium Ranelate Promotes Osteoblastic Differentiation and Mineralization of Murine Bone Marrow Stromal Cells: Involvement of Prostaglandins. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 22, 1002–1010, doi:10.1359/jbmr.070321 (2007).
Zhu, L.-L. et al. Induction of a program gene expression during osteoblast differentiation with strontium ranelate. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 355, 307–311, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.120 (2007).
Fromigué, O., Haÿ, E., Barbara, A. & Marie, P. J. Essential Role of Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells (NFAT)-mediated Wnt Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation Induced by Strontium Ranelate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, 25251–25258, doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.110502 (2010).
Ammann, P., Badoud, I., Barraud, S., Dayer, R. & Rizzoli, R. Strontium Ranelate Treatment Improves Trabecular and Cortical Intrinsic Bone Tissue Quality, a Determinant of Bone Strength. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 22, 1419–1425, doi:10.1359/jbmr.070607 (2007).
Ammann, P. et al. Strontium Ranelate Improves Bone Resistance by Increasing Bone Mass and Improving Architecture in Intact Female Rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 19, 2012–2020, doi:10.1359/jbmr.040906 (2004).
Bain, S. D., Jerome, C., Shen, V., Dupin-Roger, I. & Ammann, P. Strontium ranelate improves bone strength in ovariectomized rat by positively influencing bone resistance determinants. Osteoporosis International 20, 1417–1428, doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0815-8 (2009).
Buehler, J., Chappuis, P., Saffar, J. L., Tsouderos, Y. & Vignery, A. Strontium ranelate inhibits bone resorption while maintaining bone formation in alveolar bone in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Bone 29, 176–179, doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00484-7 (2001).
Delannoy, P., Bazot, D. & Marie, P. J. Long-term treatment with strontium ranelate increases vertebral bone mass without deleterious effect in mice. Metabolism 51, 906–911, doi:10.1053/meta.2002.33360 (2002).
Abrahamsen, B., Grove, E. L. & Vestergaard, P. Nationwide registry-based analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes in patients treated with strontium ranelate. Osteoporosis International 25, 757–762, doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2469-4 (2014).
Cooper, C., Fox, K. M. & Borer, J. S. Ischaemic cardiac events and use of strontium ranelate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a nested case–control study in the CPRD. Osteoporosis International 25, 737–745, doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2582-4 (2014).
Baier, M. et al. Strontium enhances osseointegration of calcium phosphate cement: a histomorphometric pilot study in ovariectomized rats. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 8, 1–8, doi:10.1186/1749-799x-8-16 (2013).
Hulsart-Billström, G. et al. Osteogenic potential of Sr-doped calcium phosphate hollow spheres in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 101A, 2322–2331, doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34526 (2013).
Thormann, U. et al. Bone formation induced by strontium modified calcium phosphate cement in critical-size metaphyseal fracture defects in ovariectomized rats. Biomaterials 34, 8589–8598, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.036 (2013).
Friedman, C. D., Costantino, P. D., Takagi, S. & Chow, L. C. BoneSource hydroxyapatite cement: a novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res (1998).
Xu, H. H. & Quinn, J. B. Calcium phosphate cement containing resorbable fibers for short-term reinforcement and macroporosity. Biomaterials (2002).
Barrias, C. C., Ribeiro, C. C., Lamghari, M., Miranda, C. S. & Barbosa, M. A. Proliferation, activity, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on calcium titanium phosphate microspheres. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 72A, 57–66, doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30217 (2005).
Oliveira, S. M. et al. Injectability of a bone filler system based on hydroxyapatite microspheres and a vehicle with in situ gel-forming ability. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 87B, 49–58, doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31066 (2008).
Ribeiro, C. C., Barrias, C. C. & Barbosa, M. A. Preparation and characterisation of calcium-phosphate porous microspheres with a uniform size for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 17, 455–463, doi:10.1007/s10856-006-8473-x (2006).
Ribeiro, C. C., Barrias, C. C. & Barbosa, M. A. Calcium phosphate-alginate microspheres as enzyme delivery matrices. Biomaterials 25, 4363–4373, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.028 (2004).
Barrias, C. C., Lamghari, M., Granja, P. L., Sá Miranda, M. C. & Barbosa, M. A. Biological evaluation of calcium alginate microspheres as a vehicle for the localized delivery of a therapeutic enzyme. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 74A, 545–552, doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30348 (2005).
Fonseca, K. B. et al. Injectable MMP-Sensitive Alginate Hydrogels as hMSC Delivery Systems. Biomacromolecules 15, 380–390, doi:10.1021/bm4016495 (2014).
Maia, F. R. et al. Hydrogel depots for local co-delivery of osteoinductive peptides and mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Controlled Release 189, 158–168, doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.030 (2014).
Maia, F. R., Lourenço, A. H., Granja, P. L., Gonçalves, R. M. & Barrias, C. C. Effect of Cell Density on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Aggregation in RGD-Alginate 3D Matrices under Osteoinductive Conditions. Macromolecular Bioscience 14, 759–771, doi:10.1002/mabi.201300567 (2014).
Evangelista, M. B. et al. Upregulation of bone cell differentiation through immobilization within a synthetic extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 28, 3644–3655, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.028 (2007).
Lee, K. Y. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Progress in polymer science 37, 106–126, doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 (2012).
Sakiyama-Elbert, S. & Hubbell, J. Functional Biomaterials: Design of Novel Biomaterials. Annual Review of Materials Research 31, 183–201, doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.183 (2001).
Andersen, T., Strand, B. L., Formo, K., Alsberg, E. & Christensen, B. E. In Carbohydrate Chemistry: Volume 37 Vol. 37 Ch. 9, 227–258 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012).
Mørch, Ý. A., Donati, I. & Strand, B. L. Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on Alginate Microbeads. Biomacromolecules 7, 1471–1480, doi:10.1021/bm060010d (2006).
Neves, N. et al. Strontium-rich injectable hybrid system for bone regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering: C 59, 818–827, doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.038 (2016).
D’Este M, E. D. Hydrogels in calcium phosphate moldable and injectable bone substitutes: Sticky excipients or advanced 3-D carriers? Acta Biomater (2013).
Bohner, M. et al. Synthesis of spherical calcium phosphate particles for dental and orthopedic applications. Biomatter 3, 10.4161/biom.25103 (2013).
Lourenço, A. et al. In 4th Interrogations at the Biointerface Advanced Summer School (Barcelona, 2014).
Fedorovich, N. E. et al. Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. Tissue Eng 13, 1905–1925, doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0175 (2007).
Khademhosseini, A. & Langer, R. Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28, 5087–5092, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.021 (2007).
Patenaude, M., Smeets, N. M. B. & Hoare, T. Designing Injectable, Covalently Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 35, 598–617, doi:10.1002/marc.201300818 (2014).
Lee, G.-S., Park, J.-H., Won, J.-E., Shin, U. S. & Kim, H.-W. Alginate combined calcium phosphate cements: mechanical properties and in vitro rat bone marrow stromal cell responses. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 22, 1257–1268, doi:10.1007/s10856-011-4296-5 (2011).
Xu, C., Wang, X., Zhou, J., Huan, Z. & Chang, J. Bioactive tricalcium silicate/alginate composite bone cements with enhanced physicochemical properties. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, n/a-n/a, 10.1002/jbm.b.33848 (2017).
Sprio, S. et al. Novel Osteointegrative Sr-Substituted Apatitic Cements Enriched with Alginate. Materials 9, 763 (2016).
Bidarra, S. J. et al. Injectable in situ crosslinkable RGD-modified alginate matrix for endothelial cells delivery. Biomaterials 32, 7897–7904, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.013 (2011).
Banerjee, S. S., Tarafder, S., Davies, N. M., Bandyopadhyay, A. & Bose, S. Understanding the influence of MgO and SrO binary doping on the mechanical and biological properties of β-TCP ceramics. Acta Biomaterialia 6, 4167–4174, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.012 (2010).
Lin, K. et al. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 34, 10028–10042, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.056 (2013).
Daculsi, G., Uzel, A. P., Weiss, P., Goyenvalle, E. & Aguado, E. Developments in injectable multiphasic biomaterials. The performance of microporous biphasic calcium phosphate granules and hydrogels. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 21, 855–861, doi:10.1007/s10856-009-3914-y (2010).
Gauthier, O. et al. In vivo bone regeneration with injectable calcium phosphate biomaterial: A three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic, biomechanical and SEM study. Biomaterials 26, 5444–5453, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.072 (2005).
Loi, F. et al. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone 86, 119–130, doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.020 (2016).
Vasconcelos, D. P. et al. Modulation of the inflammatory response to chitosan through M2 macrophage polarization using pro-resolution mediators. Biomaterials 37, 116–123, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.035 (2015).
Vasconcelos, D. P. et al. Development of an immunomodulatory biomaterial: Using resolvin D1 to modulate inflammation. Biomaterials 53, 566–573, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.120 (2015).
Vasconcelos, D. M. et al. Fibrinogen scaffolds with immunomodulatory properties promote in vivo bone regeneration. Biomaterials 111, 163–178, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.004 (2016).
Cardemil, C. et al. Strontium-Doped Calcium Phosphate and Hydroxyapatite Granules Promote Different Inflammatory and Bone Remodelling Responses in Normal and Ovariectomised Rats. PLoS ONE 8, e84932, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084932 (2013).
Montes, G. S. & Junqueira, L. C. U. The use of the Picrosirius-polarization method for the study of the biopathology of collagen. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 86, 1–11 (1991).
Vieira, A. E. et al. Intramembranous Bone Healing Process Subsequent to Tooth Extraction in Mice: Micro-Computed Tomography, Histomorphometric and Molecular Characterization. PLoS ONE 10, e0128021, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128021 (2015).
Wei, L. et al. A comparative study of Sr-incorporated mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for regeneration of osteopenic bone defects. Osteoporosis International 25, 2089–2096, doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2735-0 (2014).
Carvalho, C. et al. Evolution of bone disease after kidney transplantation: A prospective histomorphometric analysis of trabecular and cortical bone. Nephrology 21, 55–61, doi:10.1111/nep.12570 (2016).
Marie, P. J. et al. An uncoupling agent containing strontium prevents bone loss by depressing bone resorption and maintaining bone formation in estrogen-deficient rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 8, 607–615, doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080512 (1993).
Takahashi, S. et al. Determination of major and trace elements in the liver of Wistar rats by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry and mass spectrometry. Laboratory Animals 34, 97–105, doi:10.1258/002367700780577966 (2000).
Fonseca, K. B., Bidarra, S. J., Oliveira, M. J., Granja, P. L. & Barrias, C. C. Molecularly designed alginate hydrogels susceptible to local proteolysis as three-dimensional cellular microenvironments. Acta Biomaterialia 7, 1674–1682, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.029 (2011).
Le Guehennec, L. et al. Small-animal models for testing macroporous ceramic bone substitutes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 72B, 69–78, doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30118 (2005).
Santos, S. G. et al. Adsorbed fibrinogen leads to improved bone regeneration and correlates with differences in the systemic immune response. Acta Biomaterialia 9, 7209–7217, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.008 (2013).
Sousa, D. M. et al. Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonism increases bone mass in mice. Bone 51, 8–16, doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.020 (2012).
Fuchs, R. K. et al. Strontium ranelate does not stimulate bone formation in ovariectomized rats. Osteoporosis International 19, 1331–1341, doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0602-6 (2008).
Acknowledgements
The authors thankfully acknowledge the use of Micro-CT in the 3B’s Research Group facilities at University of Minho, the use of microscopy services at Centro de Materiais da Universidade do Porto (CEMUP) and the technicians responsible for the experimental techniques mentioned, Vitor Correlo and Daniela Silva, respectively; Carla Rodrigues from Requimte at FCT-UNL for the help with ICP-AES analysis. This work was financed by FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Operacional Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI), Portugal 2020, and by Portuguese funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/ Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação in the framework of the project “Institute for Research and Innovation in Health Sciences” (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007274) and project PTDC/CTM/103181/2008. AHL acknowledges FCT for PhD grant: SFRH/BD/87192/2012, CCB acknowledges FCT for research position Investigator FCT (IF2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design: A.H.L., N.N., M.L., C.R. Preparation of materials: A.H.L., C.R. Surgical procedures: A.H.L., N.N. Animal follow-up and data collection: A.H.L., C.R.-M. Preparation for elemental ICP-AES analysis and interpretation: A.H.L., S.R.S. Histological analysis and interpretation: A.H.L., C.R.-M., M.L., C.R. Discussion and interpretation of the results: A.H.L., N.N., C.R.-M., S.R.S., M.L., C.B., A.T.C., M.B., C.R. Drafting manuscript: A.H.L., N.N., C.R. All authors critically revised manuscript content and approved final version of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Henriques Lourenço, A., Neves, N., Ribeiro-Machado, C. et al. Injectable hybrid system for strontium local delivery promotes bone regeneration in a rat critical-sized defect model. Sci Rep 7, 5098 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04866-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04866-4
This article is cited by
-
Bioceramics: a review on design concepts toward tailor-made (multi)-functional materials for tissue engineering applications
Journal of Materials Science (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.