Abstract
The purposes of this study were (1) to characterize embryonic eye development during incubation in ovo and (2) to analyze the putative influence of repetitive ultrahigh-field MRI (UHF-MRI) measurements on this development. A population of 38 fertilized chicken eggs was divided into two sub-groups: two eggs (Group A) were examined repeatedly during the developmental period from embryonic day 1 (E1) to embryonic day 20 (E20) to evaluate the influence of daily MRI scanning. A second larger group of 36 eggs was examined pairwise on one day only, from E3 to E20, and the embryos were sacrificed immediately after MR imaging (Group B). Fast T2-weighted MR sequences provided biometric data on the eye with an in-plane resolution of 74 μm. The data show rapid growth of the eye with a steep increase in intraocular dimensions in all axis directions and in eyeball volume during initial development up to E10, followed by a phase of reduced growth rate in later developmental stages. Comparison of the two groups revealed no differences in ocular development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The developing chick is an excellent and favored model for studies in the field of embryology research1,2,3. Bain et al. have observed that ‘all of the developing chick’s requirements, with the exception of oxygen and heat, are provided by the egg contents and the surrounding eggshell’1. Due to this fact and the ready accessibility and economical availability of fertilized chicken eggs, the in ovo embryo has become a widely used animal model in the basic and applied sciences1, 3, achieving particularly well-established status in the field of ophthalmological research4,5,6. For example, chick embryos have already been useful in research into the hypoxic cellular response4, the invagination of the optic vesicles5 and the effect of green LED light stimuli on post-hatch growth and eye development6.
According to the developmental staging series published by Hamburger and Hamilton7, chick ocular development starts at embryonic stage 9 (i.e., 29–33 hours after fertilization) with the formation of the optic vessels. The lens-placode is present at stage 14 (50–53 hours) and the optic cup is entirely shaped at stage 15 (50–55 hours). Embryos are usually sacrificed at different time points for histology, growth measurements and further examinations, a practice that precludes longitudinal assessments of the development of a specific embryo in vivo 2, 4, 5, 8. In some previous studies involving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), avian embryos were fixed prior to imaging of different tissues and the eye in order to obtain good image quality and precise measurements with combined use of contrast agents2, 8, 9. MRI has also been commonly used for in vivo imaging of chick and quail embryos1, 10, 11, in principle permitting repeated observations of the same embryo1, and to assess the development of the chick eye. However, previous studies have been limited by their spatial in-plane resolution12, their invasiveness2, 8, 13 or their incomplete coverage of embryonic development1, 2, 8.
Ultrahigh-field MRI (UHF-MRI) with spatial resolution of the order of <100 μm is known as MR microscopy (MRM)14, 15. Because UHF-MRI provides anatomical images at high quality with excellent resolution comparable to conventional histology16, it is a logical step to apply this technique to the study of avian embryology. However, the drawback is that the scan time becomes quite long and, especially at later developmental stages, the embryo has to be cooled externally to reduce chick motion artifacts.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of MR imaging with an in-plane resolution of <100 μm for continuous in vivo high-resolution assessment of the development of the chick eye in ovo and to examine the impact of repeated imaging and cooling on embryo development.
Materials and Methods
Chick embryo incubation
All animals were handled in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and the experiments are compliant with national animal welfare legislation. Thirty-eight fertilized chicken eggs (White Leghorn) were obtained from a commercial hatchery (Valo BioMedia, Osterholz-Scharmbeck, Germany) and stored at room temperature (20 °C) for three days prior to the start of incubation, which was performed in an incubator with automated egg-turning (HEKA-Turbo 168, HEKA, Rietberg, Germany) at 37.8 °C and 60% relative humidity with 12 turns per day. All thirty-eight eggs were incubated simultaneously up to embryonic day 20 (E20). Eggs were scanned using MRI at 7.1 Tesla as follows: two eggs were scanned every day between E1 and E20 (Group A) and 36 eggs were scanned at only one time point (Group B) from E3 up to E20 (two eggs at each time point).
All MRI examinations were performed in ovo and none of the embryos hatched. Incubation was terminated at the indicated time points, the eggs were opened and third toe length was determined after embryo decapitation to control for correct embryonic development, according to the staging criteria of Hamburger and Hamilton7.
MR imaging
In vivo MR imaging was performed on a 7.1 T MRI scanner (ClinScan, Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) with a bore size of 13 cm using a 16-channel volume coil (rat body coil) and a small surface loop coil of 30 mm diameter (s1 coil, Bruker Biospin) for signal detection (Fig. 1). During the first ten days, a fast T2-weighted (T2w) localizer was acquired using the 16-channel volume coil to identify chick position inside the egg. If necessary, the position of the egg was corrected and the actual position of the eyes of the embryo was marked on the outer surface of the egg for faster localization on follow-up imaging and actual data acquisition by the surface coil. Due to the increased size of the embryo from E11, fast T2w localizers were acquired with the surface coil and if necessary, the position of the coil was corrected. Slicing was adjusted with localizers until parallel and symmetrical visibility of left and right lenses was achieved. Afterward, high-resolution T2w turbo spin-echo (TSE) images of the orbits were acquired in two orthogonal planes. Imaging parameters were: TR 2100 ms, TE 48 ms, turbo factor 7, field of view (FoV) 38 × 38 mm with a slice thickness of 700 µm, and no partial-Fourier acceleration. With a matrix size of 512 × 512 interpolated with zero filling to 1024 × 1024, the in-plane resolution was 74 × 74 µm. The number of slices was adjusted to cover the entire orbit in the axial and coronal planes with a minimum number of 12 slices. Acquisition time depended on the number of slices and ranged between 12 minutes 15 seconds and 18 minutes 23 seconds.
For UHF-MRI, eggs older than E10 were bedded on crushed ice 10 minutes prior to the start and during MRI for 50–70 minutes in total to reduce embryo movement and associated motion artifacts (Fig. 1). It was deemed sufficient to start moderate cooling at E10 because no effects on image quality due to embryo movement were identified at earlier stages. MRI itself was then performed at room temperature (22.4 ± 1.2 °C) within the bore of the scanner.
Measurement of embryonic third toe length
After MRI the eggs from Group B were carefully opened, the embryos were killed by decapitation, and third toe length was measured. Third toe length is defined as the distance between the metatarsal joint and the tip of claw7. Measurements were taken manually from E10 to E20 to determine the correct stage of development in comparison with reference values published in the literature8,17.
Image analysis of chick eyes
For image evaluation and ocular biometry, MR datasets were transferred to OsiriX© 7.5 (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland). The following ocular measurements were performed (see Fig. 2): axial length (AL, posterior cornea to retina), equatorial length (EL, upper to lower pole of the eyeball including cornea), axial lens thickness (LT), lens diameter (LD), vitreous body distance (VB) and length of pecten oculi (PL). Mean values were calculated from left eye and right eye for each egg and hence we used only one value per egg for data analysis. The contour of the eyeball was defined manually by drawing a region of interest in every image where the eyeball was visible. The volume of the eyeball was then computed using the ROI volume calculation algorithm provided by OsiriX©. The circumferential surface of the eye therefore had to be taken from every individual slice.
Tissue preparation and HE staining for ganglion cell counting
Eyeballs from Groups A and B (n = 2 in each case) were fixed at E20 in 4% PFA for 1 to 3 days and washed with PBS. Whole tissue was dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series, cleared with xylene, and infiltrated with liquid paraffin. Consecutive 5-µm thick sections were cut, and every 100th section was stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 7–10 minutes, and cleaned with 1% hydrochloric acid in 70% ethanol for a few seconds. After washing with tap water for 15–30 minutes and brief rinsing in distilled water, sections were counterstained with 1% eosin for up to 3 minutes and rinsed again. Following dehydration in an ascending ethanol series and xylene clearance, the sections were covered with the mounting medium Entellan® (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and coverslips. Cells of the retinal ganglion layer were counted under the microscope by evaluating all nuclei, and the total cell number of the retinal ganglion layer was estimated using Cavalieri’s method.
Statistical analysis
All data were stored and analyzed using the SPSS statistical package 23.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive statistics were computed for continuous variables, including mean and standard deviations. Because the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test did not reject the normal distribution hypothesis, testing for differences in continuous variables between study groups was accomplished with a 2-sample t test using the Bonferroni correction. For several parameters, evolution over time was described using specific linear or nonlinear regression analyses with best curve-fitting according to the coefficient of determination.
Results
General growth of chick embryo
All 38 fertilized chicken eggs were successfully incubated for analysis by MRI. Based on Group B, the length of the third toe was used as a reference mark for developmental staging from E10 (Hamburger and Hamilton (HH) stage 36) to E20 (HH stage 45). The results of our measurements in comparison with the reference values of Hamburger and Hamilton are illustrated in Fig. 3. The values (n = 2) collected from the examined embryos in Group B are for the most part located within the reference range.
A representative overview of the collected data on several days in the embryonic period is presented in Fig. 4 demonstrating that intraocular structures such as the lens, pecten oculi, ciliary body and the anterior and posterior chamber can be identified in T2w images. Embryonic structures were identified using MRI at E1, whereas ocular compartments were first identified at E4 (images not presented). Ocular biometric data can first be obtained at E5. The lens is the first intraocular anatomic structure to appear and it can be seen from E5. The ciliary body, which fixes the lens in the ciliary muscle, is visible from E10. The pecten oculi, a specific structure in the avian eye which contains vessels to supply the vitreous body, first appears at E8, but can be measured accurately from E12.
Cooling and MRI influence
To evaluate whether daily MRI scanning with cooling of the egg has any influence on embryonic growth, and specifically on the development of the eye, two intraocular dimensions (axial length of the eyeball (AL) and lens thickness (LT)) were compared between Groups A and B (Fig. 5). Intraocular dimensions were quantified in Groups A and B from E5 onward. In reality, closely corresponding values were obtained for both groups, with a maximum difference in mean axial length values observed at E10 (0.49 mm) but becoming minimal toward the end of incubation.
Curve-fitting using a nonlinear regression model yielded an excellent fit for lens thickness
In detail, the equations were:
and
with very similar values for the parameters a and b. At each time point the 2-sample t test (with Bonferroni correction) clearly showed no significant differences between Groups A and B.
For axial length of the eyeball an excellent fit was obtained with the cubic model
The respective equations for Groups A and B were: \(A{L}_{A}=-9.47+3.20\times day\,of\,incubation\) \(-\,0.2014\times day\,of\,incubatio{n}^{2}\,+\,0.004241\times day\,of\,incubatio{n}^{3},({{\rm{r}}}^{2}=0.992)\) and
For all time points the 2-sample t test did not reject the equality hypothesis.
Furthermore, total cell counts (mean of two eyes from different eggs) were estimated in the chick embryo retinal ganglion layer at E20 in both experimental conditions, yielding 3.79 × 106 ± 0.127 × 106 in Group A and 3.85 × 106 ± 0.200 × 106 in Group B (Fig. 5) (2-sample t test: p = 0.754).
Monitoring ocular growth
As mentioned above, intraocular structures were first observed at E4 and during all subsequent stages. All measurements were acquired separately for each day of incubation on both eyes of each chick embryo, illustrating the different growth phases of the underlying structures (Fig. 6). Approximately linear growth was noted for lens diameter and lens thickness during development from E5 to E20 with
and
while vitreous body length, axial length of the eyeball and equatorial length of the eyeball displayed higher growth rates until E10 followed by moderate growth thereafter. Best curve fitting was achieved with the following cubic models:
and
with emphasized excellent fitting.
The volume of the eyeball (Fig. 7) was calculated using the OsiriX© 3D-reconstruction functionality. Detectable eyeball volume increased more than 80-fold from 0.004 cm3 at E5 to 0.337 cm3 at E20 with almost linear volume growth from E5 to E10 and a lesser rate of growth during the second half of in ovo development from E10 to E20.
The pecten oculi is an anatomic structure specific to the avian eye and contains numerous blood vessels for the nutritional support of the retina18. The pecten is a delicate structure arising from a primordium at the closing choroid fissure and projecting into the vitreous body, starting at E8. We were able to identify pecten structures at E10 and measured pecten length in our MR images from E12 onward, showing a moderate growth curve with relatively constant values after E15 (Fig. 8).
Discussion
As frequently mentioned in the literature and confirmed again in the present study, MRI is an excellent tool for non-invasive and non-destructive imaging1, 2, 8, 12, 13, especially of the eye15, 16. MRI in human eyes correlates strongly with results of conventional ophthalmic imaging techniques15, 16, 19. To date, MRI has been used several times to study chick embryos1, 2, 8, 12, 13. To the best of our knowledge, those studies involved either in vitro imaging of chick embryos8 or merely covered parts of the embryonic period1 and in no case did they describe in vivo diagnostics from day 1 to day 20 of incubation1, 2, 8, 13. Our results suggest that a longitudinal study covering the entire embryonic period is feasible and that MRI is suitable for in ovo and in vivo investigations of chick embryos. Referring to in ovo diagnostics the eggshell does not present a barrier to MR imaging of the embryo inside1, 2.
Several approaches have been adopted for studying the appearance and development of chick organs or the vascular system using a variety MR modalities1, 2, 13. In our study, focusing on the eye, it was possible to image several intraocular structures from E5. Surface area, eyeball volume and lens thickness had been determined in a previous study1, but were reported to start at a later time point, namely at E12. In the present study, to obtain an accurate overview of chick embryonic eye growth, we measured five intraocular dimensions: axial and equatorial length (AL, EL), lens thickness and lens diameter (LT, LD), and length of vitreous body (VB) (Fig. 6), as well as the volume of the eyeball (Fig. 7) and the length of the pecten (PL) (Fig. 8). Almost linear growth was found for lens diameter and lens thickness during development from E5 to E20, while vitreous body length, and the axial and equatorial length of the eyeball showed higher growth rates until E10 followed by moderate growth thereafter.
The pecten oculi is a highly vascularized structure specific to the avian eye that has been implicated in perfusion and nutrition of the inner retina20, 21. The pecten primordium is of glial origin and extends into the vitreous body, forming many pleats during subsequent growth. In our study this unique structure was successfully monitored from E12 onward. At this developmental time point endothelial barrier properties are about to become established in the pecten and these are crucial for its later function18. While pecten growth and maturation continue beyond hatching, our results demonstrate that MRI permits monitoring of the growth and in vivo localization of this delicate supportive structure that is relevant to retinal nutrition.
In a further main enquiry addressed by this study, two groups (A and B) were compared to clarify whether daily MRI scanning, including cooling, has any effects on embryonic development. According to the study by Bain et al., the combination of repeated cooling and multiple MRI scans does not slow down or arrest the embryonic development of chicks1. However, that investigation started at E12 and did not consider cooling as well as MRI-based bioeffects in the early embryonic period. Our growth data for lens thickness and axial length for groups A and B indicate no significant difference between eggs scanned every day (Group A) and eggs scanned only at one single time point (Group B).
Several studies have investigated retinal neurogenesis, development or degeneration in various model systems by evaluation of cell numbers and distribution22,23,24. Ganglion cells are distributed unevenly across the mature retina and form specific patterns of high-density areas that differ among species, depending on habits and necessity25. Chickens usually possess only one of these high-density areas; however, it has been demonstrated that post-hatching chicks have two such areas26. Hence, the total number of cells varies significantly depending on the age of the chicks. Chen et al. reported an increase in total cell number in the chicken ganglion cell layer from 3.64 × 106 at E8 to a maximal 7.85 × 106 at E14. The number of cells decreased slightly to 6.08 × 106 at post-hatching day 1 (P1) and 4.87 × 106 at P827. Because the retinae were stained with cresyl violet, the reported total cell numbers include retinal ganglion cells as well as a mixture of microglia and displaced amacrine cells. Galindo-Romero et al. recorded a relatively consistent number of 1.9 × 106 retinal ganglion cells between E12 and P11 following Brn3a+ labeling28. Similarly, Rager & Rager estimated a number of about 2.4 × 106 retinal ganglion cells, remaining constant from E18 until adulthood, following an electron microscope evaluation of optic nerve fibers23.
We estimated total cell counts (mean of 2 eyes) of 3.79 × 106 (Group A) and 3.85 × 106 (Group B) in the chick embryo retinal ganglion layer at E20 in both experimental conditions. We recognize that interneuron cells and glial cells will have been included alongside the projecting retinal ganglion cells. Nevertheless, from the estimated comparable cell numbers, we conclude that daily MRI, including cooling, seemingly does not interfere with neuronal, i.e., retinal development.
In terms of the MRI and histological findings in Groups A and B, all the chick embryos used in this study developed normally in accordance with reference criteria and it can be assumed that multiple MRI scans do not delay or modify development in the chick embryo.
Conclusions
The present study describes a novel in ovo scan protocol for in vivo MR imaging of chick embryos over the entire prenatal period. Imaging covered the complete developmental period up to E20, and intraocular biometry was possible from E5 onward. Our data show that neither moderate cooling nor daily UHF-MRI examinations are harmful to the embryonic eye as revealed by MRI and histology. We conclude that MRI can be used to image the very smallest intraocular changes and has the capability to depict embryonic ocular development in a noninvasive and truly longitudinal manner.
References
Bain, M. M. et al. Noninvasive monitoring of chick development in ovo using a 7T MRI system from day 12 of incubation through to hatching. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26, 198–201, doi:10.1002/jmri.20963 (2007).
Li, X. et al. Micro-magnetic resonance imaging of avian embryos. J. Anat. 211, 798–809, doi:10.1111/joa.2007.211.issue-6 (2007).
Stern, C. D. The chick embryo–past, present and future as a model system in developmental biology. Mech. Dev. 121, 1011–1013, doi:10.1016/j.mod.2004.06.009 (2004).
Barber, J. & Itasaki, N. Expression of prolyl hydroxylases 2 and 3 in chick embryos. Gene Expr. Patterns 21, 97–102, doi:10.1016/j.gep.2016.04.001 (2016).
Oltean, A., Huang, J., Beebe, D. C. & Taber, L. A. Tissue growth constrained by extracellular matrix drives invagination during optic cup morphogenesis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 15, 1405–1421, doi:10.1007/s10237-016-0771-8 (2016).
Zhang, L. et al. Green LED light stimuli during incubation enhances posthatch growth without disrupting normal eye development of broiler embryos and hatchlings. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 29, 1562–1568, doi:10.5713/ajas.15.0976 (2016).
Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H. L. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49–92, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4687 (1951).
Goodall, N. et al. 3-Dimensional modelling of chick embryo eye development and growth using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Exp. Eye Res. 89, 511–521, doi:10.1016/j.exer.2009.05.014 (2009).
Ruffins, S. W. et al. Digital three-dimensional atlas of quail development using high-resolution MRI. ScientificWorldJournal 7, 592–604, doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.125 (2007).
Boss, A. et al. Measurement of T1, T2, and magnetization transfer properties during embryonic development at 7 Tesla using the chicken model. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28, 1510–1514, doi:10.1002/jmri.v28:6 (2008).
Duce, S., Morrison, F., Welten, M., Baggott, G. & Tickle, C. Micro-magnetic resonance imaging study of live quail embryos during embryonic development. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29, 132–139, doi:10.1016/j.mri.2010.08.004 (2011).
Xu, J. et al. In ovo monitoring of smooth muscle fiber development in the chick embryo: diffusion tensor imaging with histologic correlation. PloS one 7, e34009, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034009 (2012).
Hogers, B. et al. Magnetic resonance microscopy at 17.6-Tesla on chicken embryos in vitro. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14, 83–86, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586 (2001).
Lindner, T. et al. High spatial resolution in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the human eye, orbit, nervus opticus and optic nerve sheath at 7.0 Tesla. Exp. Eye Res. 125, 89–94, doi:10.1016/j.exer.2014.05.017 (2014).
Langner, S., Krueger, P.-C., Lindner, T., Niendorf, T. & Stachs, O. In vivo MR microscopy of the human eye. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 231, 1016–1022, doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368575 (2014).
Falke, K. et al. Experimental differentiation of intraocular masses using ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging–a case series. PloS One 8, e81284, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081284 (2013).
Bellairs, R. & Osmond, M. Atlas of Chick Development. (Elsevier/Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2014).
Liebner, S., Gerhardt, H. & Wolburg, H. Maturation of the blood-retina barrier in the developing pecten oculi of the chicken. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 100, 205–219, doi:10.1016/S0165-3806(97)00043-6 (1997).
Lindner, T. et al. Anatomic and pathological characterization of choroidal melanoma using multimodal imaging: what is practical, what is needed? Melanoma Res. 25, 252–258, doi:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000156 (2015).
Gerhardt, H., Liebner, S. & Wolburg, H. The pecten oculi of the chicken as a new in vivo model of the blood-brain barrier. Cell Tissue Res. 285, 91–100, doi:10.1007/s004410050624 (1996).
Pettigrew, J. D., Wallman, J. & Wildsoet, C. F. Saccadic oscillations facilitate ocular perfusion from the avian pecten. Nature 343, 362–363, doi:10.1038/343362a0 (1990).
Suzuki, M. et al. Glucocerebrosidase deficiency accelerates the accumulation of proteinase K-resistant alpha-synuclein and aggravates neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 6675–6686, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv372 (2015).
Rager, G. & Rager, U. Systems-matching by degeneration. I. A quantitative electron microscopic study of the generation and degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in the chicken. Exp. Brain Res. 33, 65–78 (1978).
Tsai, Y. et al. Ocular changes in TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 523–534, doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12888 (2014).
Hughes, A. The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organisation. In: F. Crescitelli (ed.), The Visual System in Vertebrates. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer–Verlag; pp. 613–756.
Chen, Y. & Naito, J. A quantitative analysis of cells in the ganglion cell layer of the chick retina. Brain Behav. Evol. 53, 75–86 (1999).
Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Shibata, H. & Naito, J. Quantitative analysis of cells in the ganglion cell layer of the chick retina: developmental changes in cell density and cell size. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 33, 161–167, doi:10.1111/j.1439-0264.2004.00528.x (2004).
Galindo-Romero, C. et al. Neuroprotection by alpha2-adrenergic receptor stimulation after excitotoxic retinal injury: a study of the total population of retinal ganglion cells and their distribution in the chicken retina. PloS One 11, e0161862, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161862 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Mr David Beattie (freelance medical writer/UK) for editorial assistance in preparing the manuscript for publication. The work was financially supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) within the RESPONSE project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.L.: data collection as well as data analysis and interpretation (MRI), writing parts of the manuscript, drafting the article, critical revision of the article. R.K.: data collection as well as data analysis and interpretation (MRI), writing parts of the manuscript, drafting the article. F.S.: data collection as well as data analysis and interpretation (MRI). T.S.: data collection, data analysis and interpretation (histology), drafting the article, critical revision of the article. S.H.: data collection (incubation, MRI). J.P.K.: critical revision of the article (MRI). R.F.G.: drafting the article (clinical expertise). A.W.: conception/design of the work, data analysis and interpretation (histology). A.N.: data collection, data analysis and interpretation (histology). M.F.: conception/design of the work (incubation), critical revision of the article. Ä.G.: statistical analysis of the data. S.L.: conception and design of the work (MRI), writing parts of the manuscript, critical revision of the article. O.S.: conception and design of the work (overall), writing parts of the manuscript, critical revision of the article. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lindner, T., Klose, R., Streckenbach, F. et al. Morphologic and biometric evaluation of chick embryo eyes in ovo using 7 Tesla MRI. Sci Rep 7, 2647 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02755-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02755-4
This article is cited by
-
Ultrahigh-Field Quantitative MR Microscopy of the Chicken Eye In Vivo Throughout the In Ovo Period
Molecular Imaging and Biology (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.