Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structural insights into BIC-mediated inactivation of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2

Abstract

Cryptochromes (CRYs) are blue-light receptors in plants that harbor FAD as a cofactor and regulate various physiological responses. Photoactivated CRYs undergo oligomerization, which increases the binding affinity to downstream signaling partners. Despite decades of research on the activation of CRYs, little is known about how they are inactivated. Binding of blue-light inhibitors of cryptochromes (BICs) to CRY2 suppresses its photoactivation, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Here, we report crystal structures of CRY2N (CRY2 PHR domain) and the BIC2–CRY2N complex with resolutions of 2.7 and 2.5 Å, respectively. In the BIC2–CRY2N complex, BIC2 exhibits an extremely extended structure that sinuously winds around CRY2N. In this way, BIC2 not only restrains the transfer of electrons and protons from CRY2 to FAD during photoreduction but also interacts with the CRY2 oligomer to return it to the monomer form. Uncovering the mechanism of CRY2 inactivation lays a solid foundation for the investigation of cryptochrome protein function.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Crystal structure of the CRY2 PHR domain.
Fig. 2: Overall structure of the BIC2–CRY2N complex.
Fig. 3: Close-up view of BIC2–CRY2N interfaces.
Fig. 4: BIC2 inhibits photoreduction of FAD in vitro.
Fig. 5: BICs inhibit photoactivation of CRY2 in vitro and ex vivo.
Fig. 6: Proposed model for BIC-mediated inactivation of CRY2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Atomic coordinates and structure factors of CRY2N and BIC2–CRY2N complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes PDB 6K8I and 6K8K, respectively. Source data for Fig. 5 and Extended Data Figs. 1, 7 and 10 are available with the paper online.

References

  1. Yang, Z. et al. Cryptochromes orchestrate transcription regulation of diverse blue light responses in plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 93, 112–127 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, M. & Cashmore, A. R. HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor. Nature 366, 162–166 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman, P. D., Batschauer, A. & Hays, J. B. PHH1, a novel gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a protein similar to plant blue-light photoreceptors and microbial photolyases. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253, 259–265 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, C., Ahmad, M., Chan, J. & Cashmore, A. R. CRY2, a second member of the Arabidopsis cryptochrome gene family. Plant Physiol. 110, 1047 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guo, H., Yang, H., Mockler, T. C. & Lin, C. Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science 279, 1360–1363 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Din El-Assal, S., Alonso-Blanco, C., Peeters, A. J., Raz, V. & Koornneef, M. A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat. Genet. 29, 435–440 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, H., Liu, B., Zhao, C., Pepper, M. & Lin, C. The action mechanisms of plant cryptochromes. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 684–691 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Q. et al. Beyond the photocycle—how cryptochromes regulate photoresponses in plants? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 45, 120–126 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, X., Liu, H., Klejnot, J. & Lin, C. The cryptochrome blue light receptors. Arabidopsis Book 8, e0135 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, C. et al. Association of flavin adenine dinucleotide with the Arabidopsis blue light receptor CRY1. Science 269, 968–970 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B. et al. Signaling mechanisms of plant cryptochromes in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Res. 129, 137–148 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Banerjee, R. et al. The signaling state of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 contains flavin semiquinone. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 14916–14922 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouly, J. P. et al. Cryptochrome blue light photoreceptors are activated through interconversion of flavin redox states. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 9383–9391 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, H. Q. et al. The C termini of Arabidopsis cryptochromes mediate a constitutive light response. Cell 103, 815–827 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang et al. The blue light-dependent phosphorylation of the CCE domain determines the photosensitivity of Arabidopsis CRY2. Mol. Plant 8, 631–643 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang et al. Cryptochrome-mediated light responses in plants. Enzymes 35, 167–189 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Q. et al. Photoactivation and inactivation of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2. Science 354, 343–347 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, H. et al. Photoexcited CRY2 interacts with CIB1 to regulate transcription and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Science 322, 1535–1539 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, D. et al. Cryptochrome 1 interacts with PIF4 to regulate high temperature-mediated hypocotyl elongation in response to blue light. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 224–229 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedmale, U. V. et al. Cryptochromes interact directly with PIFs to control plant growth in limiting blue light. Cell 164, 233–245 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H. et al. Direct interaction of cryptochromes with COP1 in light control development. Science 294, 154–158 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, H. Q., Tang, R. H. & Cashmore, A. R. The signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis CRY1 involves direct interaction with COP1. Plant Cell 13, 2573–2587 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, F. et al. Photoactivated CRY1 and phyB interact directly with AUX/IAA proteins to inhibit auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 11, 523–541 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brautigam, C. A. et al. Structure of the photolyase-like domain of cryptochrome 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12142–12147 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hitomi, K. et al. Functional motifs in the (6-4) photolyase crystal structure make a comparative framework for DNA repair photolyases and clock cryptochromes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6962–6967 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zoltowski, B. D. et al. Structure of full-length Drosophila cryptochrome. Nature 480, 396–399 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Czarna, A. et al. Structures of Drosophila cryptochrome and mouse cryptochrome1 provide insight into circadian function. Cell 153, 1394–1405 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoang, N. et al. Human and Drosophila cryptochromes are light activated by flavin photoreduction in living cells. PLoS Biol. 6, e160 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Malhotra, K. et al. Putative blue-light photoreceptors from Arabidopsis thaliana and Sinapis alba with a high degree of sequence homology to DNA photolyase contain the two photolyase cofactors but lack DNA repair activity. Biochemistry 34, 6892–6899 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang, Y. et al. Crystal structure of cryptochrome 3 from Arabidopsis thaliana and its implications for photolyase activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17701–17706 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aubert, C. et al. Intraprotein radical transfer during photoactivation of DNA photolyase. Nature 405, 586–590 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zeugner, A. et al. Light-induced electron transfer in Arabidopsis cryptochrome-1 correlates with in vivo function. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 19437–19440 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller, P. & Ahmad, M. Light-activated cryptochrome reacts with molecular oxygen to form a flavin-superoxide radical pair consistent with magnetoreception. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 21033–21040 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Solov’yov, I. A., Domratcheva, T., Moughal Shahi, A. R. & Schulten, K. Decrypting cryptochrome: revealing the molecular identity of the photoactivation reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18046–18052 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kottke, T., Batschauer, A., Ahmad, M. & Heberle, J. Blue-light-induced changes in Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 probed by FTIR difference spectroscopy. Biochemistry 45, 2472–2479 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Immeln, D. et al. Photoreaction of plant and DASH cryptochromes probed by infrared spectroscopy: the neutral radical state of flavoproteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 17155–17161 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cailliez, F., Müller, P., Gallois, M. & de la Lande, A. ATP binding and aspartate protonation enhance photoinduced electron transfer in plant cryptochrome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12974–12986 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hense, A., Herman, E., Oldemeyer, S. & Kottke, T. Proton transfer to flavin stabilizes the signaling state of the blue light receptor plant cryptochrome. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 1743–1751 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Engelhard, C. et al. Cellular metabolites enhance the light sensitivity of Arabidopsis cryptochrome through alternate electron transfer pathways. Plant Cell 26, 4519–4531 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hallett, R. A. et al. Correlating in vitro and in vivo activities of light-inducible dimers: a cellular optogenetics guide. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 53–64 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, X. et al. Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) functions by the photoactivation mechanism distinct from the tryptophan (trp) triad-dependent photoreduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20844–20849 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sang, Y. et al. N-terminal domain-mediated homodimerization is required for photoreceptor activity of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1. Plant Cell 17, 1569–1584 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Thöing, C., Oldemeyer, S. & Kottke, T. Microsecond deprotonation of aspartic acid and response of the α/β subdomain precede C-terminal signaling in the blue light sensor plant cryptochrome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5990–5999 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahmad, M. Photocycle and signaling mechanisms of plant cryptochromes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 108–115 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gao, J. et al. Trp triad-dependent rapid photoreduction is not required for the function of Arabidopsis CRY1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9135–9140 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, H. & Green, C. B. A putative flavin electron transport pathway is differentially utilized in Xenopus CRY1 and CRY2. Curr. Biol. 11, 1945–1949 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, X. et al. A CRY–BIC negative-feedback circuitry regulating blue light sensitivity of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 92, 426–436 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kennedy, M. J. et al. Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 7, 973–975 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Taslimi, A. et al. Optimized second-generation CRY2–CIB dimerizers and photoactivatable Cre recombinase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 425–430 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Taslimi, A. et al. An optimized optogenetic clustering tool for probing protein interaction and function. Nat. Commun. 5, 4925 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bugaj, L. J. et al. Regulation of endogenous transmembrane receptors through optogenetic CRY2 clustering. Nat. Commun. 6, 6898 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Shin, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal control of intracellular phase transitions using light-activated optoDroplets. Cell 168, 159–171.e14 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, X. et al. Structural basis of N6-adenosine methylation by the METTL3–METTL14 complex. Nature 542, 260 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948–1954 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL molecular graphics system (PyMOL, 2002); http://www.pymol.org

  58. Case, D. A. et al. AMBER 16 (Univ. California, 2016).

  59. Antony, J., Medvedev, D. M. & Stuchebrukhov, A. A. Theoretical study of electron transfer between the photolyase catalytic cofactor FADH- and DNA thymine dimer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 1057–1065 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the BL17U1/BL19U1/BL19U2 beamline of NCPSS at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for assistance during data collection and research associates at the Center for Protein Research, Huazhong Agricultural University for technical support. This work was supported by funds from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018YFA0507700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31722017 and 31870753), the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation (151021) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662017PY031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.Y. conceived the project. L.M., X.W. and P.Y. designed all experiments. L.M., X.W., L.W. and L.Z. performed protein purification and crystallization. Z. Guan determined all of the structures. L.M., X.W., Y.W., Z. Gong, C.S., J.W., D.Z., Z.L. and P.Y. performed the biochemical assays. All authors analyzed the data and contributed to manuscript preparation. L.M., X.W. and P.Y. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Beth Moorefield was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Biochemical analysis of the BIC2-CRY2 complex.

a, The interactions between two BICs (BIC1 and BIC2) and two CRYs (CRY1 and CRY2) in Arabidopsis thaliana were assessed by pull-down assays. b, Characterization of the purified full-length BIC2-CRY2 complex. Upper panel is the gel filtration chromatogram for BIC2-CRY2 purified using a SuperdexTM 200 increase 10/300 GL column. Elution volume of BIC2-CRY2 = 13.7 ml. The calibration standard for gel filtration chromatography is a mixture of thyroglobulin, γ-globulin, and ovalbumin proteins with approximate molecular weights of 669 kDa (10.3 ml), 158 kDa (13.0 ml), and 44 kDa (15.7 ml), respectively. The elution volume of BIC2-CRY2 is different to that of the 158 kDa marker, indicating BIC2-CRY2 complex is a heterodimer with a 1:1 stoichiometry. Lower panel: an SDS-PAGE gel showing the proteins present in the peak fractions of BIC2-CRY2 from gel filtration chromatography visualized by Coomassie blue staining. c-d, SV-AUC and SLS analyses of the molecular weight of the full-length BIC2-CRY2 complex in solution under dark conditions. SLS analysis was performed in a SuperdexTM 200 increase 10/300 GL column. e, The domain of CRY2 interacting with BICs was characterized by pull-down assays. FL: full length; PHR: photolyase-homology region; CCE: Cryptochrome C-terminal Extension. Uncropped gel images of a, b and e are available as source data.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Sequence alignment of CRY1 and CRY2.

The alignment was performed using MultAlin and ENDscript programs. Secondary structural elements are shown above the sequence. Sequence identity is shown in white letters on a red background, and sequence similarity is shown in red letters. The red and cyan dots indicate the residues interacting with FAD and AMP (in the BIC2-CRY2N structure, Extended Data Fig. 5), respectively. The yellow and dark blue dots below the sequence indicate residues involved in BIC2 hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions, respectively (in the BIC2-CRY2N structure, Extended Data Fig. 7). The magenta dots indicate the residues in CRY2 that were mutated to verify the interactions observed in the BIC2-CRY2N structure.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Structural alignment of CRY2N and full length Drosophila CRY (dCRY, PDB ID 4JZY).

Ribbon presentation of overall structural alignment is shown at center, CRY2N is colored in cyan and dCRY in gray. Alignments of different functional loops are displayed around the overall structural alignment framed by black squares. The corresponding sequence alignments are shown beneath each black square. Different functional loops and their corresponding sequences in CRY2N and dCRY are highlighted in magenta and yellow, respectively. Magenta dashed line denotes the invisible sulfur loop in CRY2N, the corresponding residues are colored in blue. Sequence identity is indicated by red boxes.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Electron density maps of BIC2 bound to CRY2N.

a, Electron densities on the surface of the groove between the α/β and α domains of CRY2N. CRY2N is presented as a cyan surface model. BIC2 is shown as a 2Fo-Fc electron density map (contoured at 1σ in blue mesh). b, Stereo view of BIC2 electron density. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map of BIC2 is contoured at 1σ and colored in blue.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Detailed environment of the FAD binding cavity in the BIC2-CRY2N complex.

a, Sequence conservation analysis and close up view of the FAD binding cavity in BIC2-CRY2N. The FAD binding cavity is mainly formed by the CRY2N α9, α10, α12, α15, α16, α17 helices, shown in the black box at right. Sequence conservation scores displayed in different colors on the surface of CRY2 were generated by the CONSURF program. The FAD and AMP molecules are presented as green and pink ball-and-stick models. The magnesium cation is colored in magenta. b, Interface between BIC2 helix α1 and the phosphate binding loop between the α9 and α10 helices of CRY2N. Yellow dashed lines denote hydrogen bonds. c, FAD and AMP molecules in the BIC2-CRY2N complex are presented as ball-and-stick models. d, FAD displays a U-shaped conformation. The electron density (blue) of FAD is contoured at 1σ. e, Schematic representation of the contacts between CRY2 and FAD. f, Stereo representation of the electron density map of AMP bound to BIC2-CRY2N complex. The 2Fo-Fc electron density (1σ level) of AMP is shown in blue. g, The binding site of AMP. AMP is recognized by CRY2 residues N356, R357, Y399, and D406. Hydrogen bonds are shown as yellow dashed lines.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Antenna pocket of BIC2-CRY2N.

Surface and ribbon representation of the BIC2-CRY2N complex. Wheat-colored ribbon denotes BIC2. Surface of CRY2N is shown in cyan. Antenna pocket of BIC2-CRY2N is shown in the black square. BIC2 residues 72-74, which were not observed in the electron density map, form a gap between the α2 and α3 helices of BIC2.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Mutational analysis of BIC2-CRY2N interface.

a, Extensive interaction networks between BIC2 and CRY2N. Residues of BIC2 and CRY2N involved in interactions are shown in yellow and cyan rectangles, respectively. Black outlines indicate residues that were mutated to verify the interactions in the BIC2-CRY2N structure. b, Analysis of the interactions between wild type BIC2 with CRY2 mutants (labeled with asterisk). c, Interactions analysis of BIC2 mutants (labeled with asterisk) with wild type CRY2. For BIC2, we mutated residues that interact with CRY2 via their side chains (residues labeled with magenta dots in Extended Data Fig. 7d). For CRY2, there are 36 residues involved in BIC interactions. PDB 6K8K was loaded to PDBePISA (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/pisa/) to analyze the interface of BIC2 and CRY2N. We then mutated 16 residues with the highest accessible surface area (ASA) and buried surface area (BSA). Residues that have a higher buried area percentage in PDBePISA interface analysis may make greater contributions to the interaction. Residues critical for complex formation are shown on a gray background. d, Sequence alignment of CID domains17 of BICs from different plant species. Secondary structural elements of BIC2 are shown above the sequence. The alignment was performed using MultAlin and ENDscript programs. Amino acid residue numbers are indicated to the left and right of each sequence. Sequence identity is indicated in white letters on a red background. Cyan and magenta dots represent the BIC2 residues interacting with CRY2N via main chains or side chains, respectively. The latter BIC2 residues were mutated to verify the interactions. Uncropped gel images of panels b and c are available as source data.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Comparison of CRY2N and BIC2-bound CRY2N structures.

a, Ribbon presentation of superposed CRY2N and BIC2-bound CRY2N structures. CRY2N is colored in yellow and BIC2-bound CRY2N is colored in cyan. Black squares show that helices α7 and α21 undergo slight conformational changes upon BIC2 binding. Helix α7 is involved in the BIC2 interactions, but helix α21 is not; conformational changes of helix α21 may be caused by crystal contacts. b, Superimposition of CRY2N (yellow) and BIC2-bound CRY2N (cyan) structures and comparison of their electron transfer pathways. The Trp-triad and D393 residues are presented as sticks. c, Electron density maps of residues W321, W374, W397, and D393 in CRY2N (yellow) and BIC2-bound (cyan) CRY2N.

Extended Data Fig. 9 BIC2 binding increases d(OD393-N5ISO) and d(HW397-OD393) distances and inhibits blue light-induced photobleaching of CRY2 in crystals and in solution.

a, Time-dependent distance d(OD393-N5ISO) in Step 2 obtained from MD simulations of CRY2N and the BIC2-CRY2N complex. b, Time-dependent distance d(HW397-OD393) in Step 3. c, Left panel shows the photoreduction activity of FAD in full-length CRY2D393A at 5 mg/ml (the absorbance at 450 nm is about 0.1). Middle panel shows the absorbances of CRY2WT and CRY2D393A at 450 nm at increasing concentrations. Wild-type CRY2 (CRY2WT) was used to generate the standard curve (blue line). When the concentration of CRY2WT is 8 mg/ml, the absorbance at 450 nm is 0.59. In contrast, the absorbance of CRY2D393A at 450 nm is only 0.14 when the concentration is 8 mg/ml. This indicates that CRY2D393A diminishes FAD binding. Right panel shows that CRY2D393A at a concentration of 53 mg/ml exhibits the same yellow color (the absorbance at 450 nm is 0.63) as CRY2WT at only 8 mg/ml. d, Photoreduction of CRY2N and BIC2-CRY2N crystals viewed by light microscopy. e, Photoreduction of the corresponding solutions. FAD is in oxidized form. Unbound and BIC2-bound CRY2 are full-length proteins.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Blue light induced CRY2 oligomer is able to interact with CIB1 by SEC.

a, SLS analyses of the molecular weight of full-length CRY2 in darkness and under blue light, respectively. All the runs were performed in a SuperoseTM 6 increase 10/300 GL column. b, Blue light induced full-length CRY2 tetramer interacts with truncated CIB1 (M16-N131) in SEC. All runs were performed in a SuperdexTM 200 increase 10/300 GL column. Under blue light treatment, the activated CRY2 is eluted at 11.5 ml (pink line), indicating CRY2 forms a blue light-induced tetramer. CIB1 alone is eluted at 16.2 ml under blue light (brown lines). After co-incubation, the blue light-induced tetramer co-elutes with CIB1 at ~11 ml (blue line), indicating a CRY2 tetramer interacts with CIB1. Right panel shows SDS–PAGE gels of peak fractions shown at left. The last three lanes are from separate gels. Uncropped gel images are available as source data.

Source data

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed western blots and gels

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed gels

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Unprocessed gels

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Unprocessed gels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, L., Wang, X., Guan, Z. et al. Structural insights into BIC-mediated inactivation of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 27, 472–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0410-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0410-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing