As artificial intelligence moves into the realm of clinical trials, consideration is needed on whether the current CONSORT and SPIRIT reporting statements are sufficient to ensure transparency.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment
Nature Open Access 05 April 2023
-
Artificial Intelligence for Anterior Segment Diseases: A Review of Potential Developments and Clinical Applications
Ophthalmology and Therapy Open Access 08 March 2023
-
Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions
Eye and Vision Open Access 07 January 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
12 November 2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
References
US Food and Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device (accessed 18 September 2019). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device
Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Heneghan, C., Shepperd, S., Loudon, K. & Bossuyt, P. M. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374, 86–89 (2009).
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G. & Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int. J. Surg. 9, 672–677 (2011).
Chan, A. W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Altman, D. G., Dickersin, K. & Moher, D. SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols. Lancet 381, 91–92 (2013).
EQUATOR Network. Reporting guidelines under development (EQUATOR Network, accessed 4 August 2019); http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/
Collins, G. S. & Moons, K. G. M. Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. Lancet 393, 1577–1579 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This initiative is funded by the Wellcome Trust, Health Data Research UK and the Alan Turing Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
The CONSORT-AI and SPIRIT-AI Steering Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed. Nat Med 25, 1467–1468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0603-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0603-3
This article is cited by
-
Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment
Nature (2023)
-
Artificial Intelligence for Anterior Segment Diseases: A Review of Potential Developments and Clinical Applications
Ophthalmology and Therapy (2023)
-
PRISMA AI reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on AI in healthcare
Nature Medicine (2023)
-
Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions
Eye and Vision (2022)
-
High-dimensional role of AI and machine learning in cancer research
British Journal of Cancer (2022)