Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in medicine is advancing rapidly, but real-world clinical implementation has not yet become a reality. Here we review some of the key practical issues surrounding the implementation of AI into existing clinical workflows, including data sharing and privacy, transparency of algorithms, data standardization, and interoperability across multiple platforms, and concern for patient safety. We summarize the current regulatory environment in the United States and highlight comparisons with other regions in the world, notably Europe and China.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Potential roles of AI-based technologies in healthcare.

Debbie Maizels/Springer Nature

Fig. 2: Integration of patient health information at multiple interfaces.

Debbie Maizels/Springer Nature

Fig. 3: Conceptual diagram of the FDA precertification for SaMD.

Debbie Maizels/Springer Nature

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulshan, V. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 316, 2402 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kermany, D. S. et al. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell 172, 1122–1131.e9 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, J.-Z. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Sci. Rep. 6, 24454 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016).

  6. Murdoch, T. B. & Detsky, A. S. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 309, 1351–1352 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, F. et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 21, 230–243 (2017).

  8. Johnson, K. W. et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 2668–2679 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, A. et al. Canadian association of radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. J. Assoc. Can. Radiol. 69, 120–135 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelcyger, B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Babylon Health & IBM Watson take the lead. Prescouter https://prescouter.com/2017/12/artificial-intelligence-healthcare/ (2017).

  11. De Fauw, J. et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat. Med. 24, 1342–1350 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slomka, P. J. et al. Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 14, 197–212 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H. & Beck, A. H. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05718 (2016).

  14. Lakhani, P. & Sundaram, B. Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 284, 574–582 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sitapati, A. et al. Integrated precision medicine: the role of electronic health records in delivering personalized treatment. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 9, 1–12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Executive Office of the President & National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology. Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence (2016).

  17. Dreyer, K. J. & Geis, J. R. When machines think: radiology’s next frontier. Radiology 285, 713–718 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Niu, J., Tang, W., Xu, F., Zhou, X. & Song, Y. Global research on artificial intelligence from 1990–2014: spatially-explicit bibliometric analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 5, 66 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Collier, M., Fu, R. & Yin, L. Artificial Intelligence: Healthcare’s New Nervous System (Accenture, 2017).

  20. From Virtual Nurses To Drug Discovery: 106 Artificial Intelligence Startups InHealthcare. CB Insights Research https://www.cbinsights.com/research/artificial-intelligence-startups-healthcare/ (2017).

  21. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H. & Magnus, D. Implementing machine learning in health care—addressing ethical challenges. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 981–983 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology Council & Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Subcomittee. The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (2016).

  23. Fonseca, C. G. et al. The Cardiac Atlas Project—an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 27, 2288–2295 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jimenez-Del-Toro, O. et al. Cloud-based evaluation of anatomical structure segmentation and landmark detection algorithms: VISCERAL anatomy benchmarks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35, 2459–2475 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Artificial Intelligence for the American People. The White House https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/artificial-intelligence-american-people/ (2018).

  26. Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Rus, D. & Meireles, O. R. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann. Surg. 268, 70–76 (2018).

  27. Patrzyk, P. M., Link, D. & Marewski, J. N. Human-like machines: transparency and comprehensibility. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e276 (2017).

  28. Sussillo, D. & Barak, O. Opening the black box: low-dimensional dynamics in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 25, 626–649 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kruse, C. S., Goswamy, R., Raval, Y. & Marawi, S. Challenges and opportunities of big data in health care: a systematic review. JMIR Med. Inform. 4, e38 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. How long it takes the US FDA to approve 510(k) submissions. Emergo https://www.emergobyul.com/resources/research/fda-510k-review-times-research (2013).

  31. IMDRF SaMD Working Group. Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Key Definitions (International Medical Device Regulators Form, 2013).

  32. US Food & Drug Administration & Center for Devices & Radiological Health Digital Health Program. Digital Health Innovation Action Plan (United States Food and Drug Administration, 2018).

  33. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Developing Software Precertificaiton Program: A Working Model (United States Food & Drug Administration, 2018).

  34. IDx. University of Iowa Health Care First to Adopt IDx-DR in a Diabetes Care Setting. Cision PR Newswire https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/university-of-iowa-health-care-first-to-adopt-idx-dr-in-a-diabetes-care-setting-300672070.html (2018).

  35. Software as a Medical Device Working Group. Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical Evaluation (United States Food and Drug Administration, 2017).

  36. Goodman, B. & Flaxman, S. European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a ‘right to explanation’. AI Mag. 38, 50 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thakar, S. 4 ways the ACR’s Data Science Institute is looking to implement AI in clinical practice. Radiology Business http://www.radiologybusiness.com/topics/artificial-intelligence/4-ways-acrs-data-science-institute-looking-implement-ai-clinica (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded in part by the Innovative team (B185004102) and Backbone talent (B185004075) training program for high-level universities of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianxing He or Kang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Baxter, S.L., Xu, J. et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 25, 30–36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing