Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Resolving the H i in damped Lyman α systems that power star formation

Abstract

Reservoirs of dense atomic gas (primarily hydrogen) contain approximately 90 per cent of the neutral gas at a redshift of 3, and contribute to between 2 and 3 per cent of the total baryons in the Universe1,2,3,4. These ‘damped Lyman α systems’—so called because they absorb Lyman α photons within and from background sources—have been studied for decades, but only through absorption lines present in the spectra of background quasars and γ-ray bursts5,6,7,8,9,10. Such pencil beams do not constrain the physical extent of the systems. Here we report integral-field spectroscopy of a bright, gravitationally lensed galaxy at a redshift of 2.7 with two foreground damped Lyman α systems. These systems are greater than 238 kiloparsecs squared in extent, with column densities of neutral hydrogen varying by more than an order of magnitude on scales of less than 3 kiloparsecs. The mean column densities are between 1020.46 and 1020.84 centimetres squared and the total masses are greater than 5.5 × 108–1.4 × 109 times the mass of the Sun, showing that they contain the necessary fuel for the next generation of star formation, consistent with relatively massive, low-luminosity primeval galaxies at redshifts greater than 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Spatial variation of neutral hydrogen column density.
Fig. 2: Maps of H i and metal absorption strengths in the absorber source-plane.
Fig. 3: Lyman α emission maps of the DLA host galaxies.
Fig. 4: Lyman α emission from the background DLAs in their source planes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are publicly available at the Keck Observatory Archive, https://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/koa/public/koa.php, under project codes N083 and K338 and the Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescope under project code GO-13003. Fully reduced data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

All codes used in this work are publicly available. The H i column density measurements were performed using the linetools package (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.168270). Reduction and analysis of the KCWI data cubes were done using the kcwitools package (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6079396). The lensing raytracing and absorption line measurements are done using the rbcodes package (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6079264). HST image analysis and lens modelling were performed with AstroDizzle31 software and Lenstool34, respectively.

References

  1. Weinberg, D. H., Miralda-Escude, J., Hernquist, L. & Katz, N. A lower bound on the cosmic baryon density. Astrophys. J. 490, 564–570 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cen, R. & Ostriker, J. P. Where are the baryons? Astrophys. J. 514, 1–6 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shull, J. M., Smith, B. D. & Danforth, C. W. The baryon census in a multiphase intergalactic medium: 30% of the baryons may still be missing. Astrophys. J. 759, 23 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Péroux, C. & Howk, J. C. The cosmic baryon and metal cycles. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 58, 363–406 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E. & Prochaska, J. X. Damped Lyα systems. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 43, 861–918 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neeleman, M. et al. [C ii] 158-µm emission from the host galaxies of damped Lyman-alpha systems. Science 355, 1285–1288 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., Kanekar, N. & Rafelski, M. A cold, massive, rotating disk galaxy 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang. Nature 581, 269–272 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prochaska, J. X. et al. The UCSD/Keck damped Lyα abundance database: a decade of high-resolution spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 171, 29–60 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rafelski, M., Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., Neeleman, M. & Mendez, A. J. Metallicity evolution of damped Lyα systems out to z ~ 5. Astrophys. J. 755, 89 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, A. J., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C. & Srianand, R. Multiphase plasma in sub-damped Ly α systems: a hidden metal reservoir. Astrophys. J. Lett. 668, L15–L18 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morrissey, P. et al. The Keck Cosmic Web Imager Integral Field Spectrograph. Astrophys. J. 864, 93 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koester, B. P. et al. Two lensed z ~ 3 Lyman break galaxies discovered in the SDSS giant arcs survey. Astrophys. J. Lett. 723, L73–L77 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rigby, J. R. et al. The Magellan evolution of galaxies spectroscopic and ultraviolet reference atlas (MegaSaura). I. The sample and the spectra. Astron. J 155, 104 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopez, S. et al. A clumpy and anisotropic galaxy halo at redshift 1 from gravitational-arc tomography. Nature 554, 493–496 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Péroux, C., Rahmani, H., Battaia, F. & Augustin, R. Spatially resolved metal gas clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, L50–L54 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rauch, M., Sargent, W., Barlow, T. & Simcoe, R. Small-scale structure at high redshift. IV. Low-ionization gas intersecting three lines of sight to Q2237+0305. Astrophys. J. 576, 45–60 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellison, S. L. et al. The sizes and kinematic structure of absorption systems towards the lensed quasar APM08279+5255. Astron. Astrophys. 414, 79–93 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bordoloi, R. et al. Spatially resolved galactic wind in lensed galaxy RCSGA 032727-132609. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 1891–1908 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peeples, M. S. et al. Figuring Out Gas & Galaxies in Enzo (FOGGIE). I. Resolving simulated circumgalactic absorption at 2 < z < 2.5. Astrophys. J. 873, 129 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson, D. et al. First results from the TNG50 simulation: galactic outflows driven by supernovae and black hole feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 3234–3261 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mawatari, K. et al. Discovery of a damped Lyα absorber at z = 3.3 along a galaxy sight-line in the SSA22 field. Astrophys. J. 817, 161 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooke, J. & O’Meara, J. M. A new constraint on the physical nature of damped Lyman alpha systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 812, L27 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Walter, F. et al. THINGS: The H i nearby galaxy survey. Astron. J 136, 2563–2647 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Broeils, A. H. & van Woerden, H. A search for spiral galaxies with extended H i disks. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 107, 129–176 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwaan, M. et al. Are the kinematics of DLAs in agreement with their arising in the gas disks of galaxies? Astron. J 136, 2886–2896 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krogager, J. K. et al. Dissecting cold gas in a high-redshift galaxy using a lensed background quasar. Astron. Astrophys. 619, A142 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fumagalli, M., O’Meara, J. M., Prochaska, J. X., Rafelski, M. & Kanekar, N. Directly imaging damped Ly α galaxies at z > 2 — III. The star formation rates of neutral gas reservoirs at z ~ 2.7. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 3178–3198 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Law, D. R. et al. The physical nature of rest-UV galaxy morphology during the peak epoch of galaxy formation. Astrophys. J. 656, 1–26 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Law, D. et al. An HST/WFC3-IR morphological survey of galaxies at z =1.5–3.6. I. Survey description and morphological properties of star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 745, 85 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacob, J. C. et al. Montage: an astronomical image mosaicking toolkit. Astrophysics Source Code Library https://www.ascl.net/1010.036 (2010).

  31. Avila, R. J. et al. in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIV (ADASS XXIV) (eds Taylor, A. R. & Rosolowsky, E.) 281–284 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2015).

  32. Sharon, K. et al. Strong lens models for 37 clusters of galaxies from the SDSS giant arcs survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 12 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharon, K. & Johnson, T. L. Revised lens model for the multiply imaged lensed supernova, ‘SN Refsdal’ in MACS J1149+2223. Astrophys. J. Lett. 800, L26 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jullo, E. et al. A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters. New J. Phys. 9, 447 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bayliss, M. B. et al. Gemini/GMOS spectroscopy of 26 strong-lensing-selected galaxy cluster cores. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 193, 8 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fathivavsari, H. et al. A ghostly damped Ly α system revealed by metal absorption lines. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, L58–L62 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a NASA Keck PI Data Award, administered by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute. Data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory from telescope time allocated to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through the agency’s scientific partnership with the California Institute of Technology and the University of California. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. This research was conducted, in part, by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), through project number CE170100013. We wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. This research made use of Montage. It is funded by the National Science Foundation under grant number ACI-1440620, and was previously funded by the NASA’s Earth Science Technology Office, Computation Technologies Project, under cooperative agreement number NCC5-626 between NASA and the California Institute of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.B. and J.M.O. developed the idea for the project, wrote the NASA/Keck telescope proposal and designed and performed the observations. R.B. developed the analysis tools, performed the analysis, devised original ways to interpret the results and authored majority of the text. J.M.O. reduced the KCWI data. A.S. performed the metal absorption line measurements. K.S. performed the lens model and provided Extended Data Fig. 1. J.R.R. provided the ancillary data from MagE and metal absorber information from MagE spectra. J.C., J.M.O. and R.B. provided steps to correct astrometric offsets and J.C. confirmed the redshift of the second DLA, and contributed to the interpretations. M.M., L.R., G.D., D.C.M., A.M.M., P.M. and J.D.N. developed the KCWI data reduction pipeline and built and delivered the instrument when initial commissioning data provided the data needed to verify the target as an object of interest. All authors, including J.M.O., J.R.R. and J.C., contributed to the overall interpretation of the results and various aspects of the analysis and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongmon Bordoloi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Zachary Hafen and Marcel Neeleman for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Source plane reconstruction of SGAS J152745.1+065219.

a, WFC3/HST images of SGAS J152745.1+065219 in the WFC3-IR F160W, WFC3-UVIS F606W and WFC3-UVIS F475W filters32. North is up and east is to the left. The gravitational lensing critical curve is shown in red, representing areas in the image plane with extreme magnification. Three boxes mark the locations of the three partially lensed images. The lensing potential is caused by the z = 0.43 elliptical galaxy at the centre of this field, boosted by a cluster of galaxies at z = 0.39, located within 1 arcminute in projection northeast of this galaxy. b, The reconstructed source plane image of the galaxy. The source-plane caustic is marked in yellow, representing regions with extreme magnification, and defining the multiplicity of the strongly lensed source. The region interior to the cusp is lensed into three images, whereas areas outside the cusp are magnified, but not multiply imaged.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Pairwise H i column density variation versus physical separation.

Variation in H i column density between six individual pointings to the background arc as a function of physical separation between them. Error bars correspond to the ±1σ uncertainty in column density ratios. The z ≈ 2.5 DLA (blue squares) shows an order-of-magnitude variation in column density in 2–3 kpc separations. This suggests significant small-scale variation inside the DLA, at 2–3 kpc physical scales. By contrast, the z ≈ 2.05 DLA (red circles) shows very little variation in column densities across different sightlines. The red circles are offset in the x direction by 1 kpc for clarity of presentation.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Variation in metal absorption line strengths of the two DLA systems.

ae, Metal absorption line strength variations of different ions across the arc for the z ≈ 2.5 DLA (blue squares) and the z ≈ 2.05 DLA (red circles), respectively. The physical separations are in the source-plane of the absorbers and centred on the centre of the background arc. The filled symbols are detections, and the open symbols are 2σ limits of non-detections. Error bars correspond to the ±1σ uncertainty measurement of absorption strengths. In all cases, the z ≈ 2.5 DLA exhibits much weaker metal absorption lines as compared to the z ≈ 2.05 DLA.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Spatial variation of neutral hydrogen column density of the z ≈ 2.05 DLA.

a, The extracted 1D Lyman α absorption profiles are shown for apertures A–C. The best-fit Voigt profiles with ±1σ error bounds are shown as solid green and dashed orange lines, respectively. The DLA column densities are marked in each panel and are in units of atoms cm−2. In each absorption profile, the DLA absorption trough reaches zero flux, indicating that the aperture is fully covering the DLA gas cloud. The emission spike in the middle of the absorption trough corresponds to Lyman α emission leaking out of the corresponding DLA host galaxy. b, As in a, but for apertures D–F.

Extended Data Table 1 Absorption line measurements for the z = 2.54290 DLA
Extended Data Table 2 Absorption line measurements for the z = 2.05601 DLA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordoloi, R., O’Meara, J.M., Sharon, K. et al. Resolving the H i in damped Lyman α systems that power star formation. Nature 606, 59–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04616-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04616-1

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing