Letter | Published:

Blue boron-bearing diamonds from Earth’s lower mantle

Naturevolume 560pages8487 (2018) | Download Citation


Geological pathways for the recycling of Earth’s surface materials into the mantle are both driven and obscured by plate tectonics1,2,3. Gauging the extent of this recycling is difficult because subducted crustal components are often released at relatively shallow depths, below arc volcanoes4,5,6,7. The conspicuous existence of blue boron-bearing diamonds (type IIb)8,9 reveals that boron, an element abundant in the continental and oceanic crust, is present in certain diamond-forming fluids at mantle depths. However, both the provenance of the boron and the geological setting of diamond crystallization were unknown. Here we show that boron-bearing diamonds carry previously unrecognized mineral assemblages whose high-pressure precursors were stable in metamorphosed oceanic lithospheric slabs at depths reaching the lower mantle. We propose that some of the boron in seawater-serpentinized oceanic lithosphere is subducted into the deep mantle, where it is released with hydrous fluids that enable diamond growth10. Type IIb diamonds are thus among the deepest diamonds ever found and indicate a viable pathway for the deep-mantle recycling of crustal elements.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Kendrick, M. A. et al. Seawater cycled throughout Earth’s mantle in partially serpentinized lithosphere. Nat. Geosci. 10, 222–228 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Tackley, P. J. Mantle convection and plate tectonics: toward an integrated physical and chemical theory. Science 288, 2002–2007 (2000).

  3. 3.

    Hofmann, A. W. Mantle geochemistry: the message from oceanic volcanism. Nature 385, 219–229 (1997).

  4. 4.

    Leeman, W. P., Tonarini, S. & Turner, S. Boron isotope variations in Tonga-Kermadec-New Zealand arc lavas: implications for the origin of subduction components and mantle influences. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 1126–1162 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Deschamps, F., Godard, M., Guillot, S. & Hattori, K. Geochemistry of subduction zone serpentinites: A review. Lithos 178, 96–127 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Plank, T. & Langmuir, C. H. The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chem. Geol. 145, 325–394 (1998).

  7. 7.

    Konrad-Schmolke, M., Halama, R. & Manea, V. C. Slab mantle dehydrates beneath Kamchatka—yet recycles water into the deep mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 17, 2987–3007 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Gaillou, E., Post, J. E., Rost, D. & Butler, J. E. Boron in natural type IIb blue diamonds: chemical and spectroscopic measurements. Am. Mineral. 97, 1–18 (2012).

  9. 9.

    King, J. M. et al. Characterizing natural-color type IIb blue diamonds. Gems Gemol. 34, 246–268 (1998).

  10. 10.

    Harte, B. Diamond formation in the deep mantle: the record of mineral inclusions and their distribution in relation to mantle dehydration zones. Mineral. Mag. 74, 189–215 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Grew, E. S. Boron: from cosmic scarcity to 300 minerals. Elements 13, 225–229 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Wu, F. Y. et al. In situ U-Pb age determination and Sr-Nd isotopic analysis of perovskite from the Premier (Cullinan) kimberlite, South Africa. Chem. Geol. 353, 83–95 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Skinner, E. & Truswell, J. in The Geology of South Africa (eds Johnson, M. R. et al.) 651–659 (Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg, 2006).

  14. 14.

    Walter, M. J. et al. Deep mantle cycling of oceanic crust: evidence from diamonds and their mineral inclusions. Science 334, 54–57 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Stachel, T., Harris, J. W., Brey, G. P. & Joswig, W. Kankan diamonds (Guinea) II: lower mantle inclusion parageneses. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 140, 16–27 (2000).

  16. 16.

    Thomson, A. et al. Origin of sub-lithospheric diamonds from the Juina-5 kimberlite (Brazil): constraints from carbon isotopes and inclusion compositions. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 168, 1081 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Harte, B. & Hudson, N. C. F. In Proc. 10th International Kimberlite Conference Vol. 1 (eds Pearson, D. G. et al.) 235–253 (Springer, New Delhi, 2013).

  18. 18.

    Nestola, F. et al. CaSiO3 perovskite in diamond indicates the recycling of oceanic crust into the lower mantle. Nature 555, 237–241 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Brenker, F. E. et al. Detection of a Ca-rich lithology in the Earth’s deep (> 300 km) convecting mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 579–587 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Anzolini, C. et al. Depth of formation of CaSiO3-walstromite included in super-deep diamonds. Lithos 265, 138–147 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Smith, E. M. et al. Large gem diamonds from metallic liquid in Earth’s deep mantle. Science 354, 1403–1405 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Anzolini, C. et al. Depth of formation of super-deep diamonds: Raman barometry of CaSiO3-walstromite inclusions. Am. Mineral. 103, 69–74 (2018).

  23. 23.

    Angel, R. J., Mazzucchelli, M. L., Alvaro, M. & Nestola, F. EosFit-Pinc: a simple GUI for host-inclusion elastic thermobarometry. Am. Mineral. 102, 1957–1960 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Hanley, P. L., Kiflawi, I. & Lang, A. R. On topographically identifiable sources of cathodoluminescence in natural diamonds. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 284, 329–368 (1977).

  25. 25.

    Stachel, T., Harris, J., Aulbach, S. & Deines, P. Kankan diamonds (Guinea) III: d13C and nitrogen characteristics of deep diamonds. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 142, 465–475 (2002).

  26. 26.

    Milledge, H. J. et al. Carbon isotopic variation in spectral type II diamonds. Nature 303, 791–792 (1983).

  27. 27.

    Pabst, S. et al. Evidence for boron incorporation into the serpentine crystal structure. Am. Mineral. 96, 1112–1119 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Ohtani, E., Litasov, K., Hosoya, T., Kubo, T. & Kondo, T. Water transport into the deep mantle and formation of a hydrous transition zone. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 143–144, 255–269 (2004).

  29. 29.

    Pearson, D. G. et al. Hydrous mantle transition zone indicated by ringwoodite included within diamond. Nature 507, 221–224 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Nestola, F. et al. Tetragonal Almandine-Pyrope Phase, TAPP: finally a name for it, the new mineral jeffbenite. Mineral. Mag. 80, 1219–1232 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Liu, J., Li, J. & Ikuta, D. Elastic softening in Fe7C3 with implications for Earth’s deep carbon reservoirs. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 1514–1524 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Howell, D., Wood, I. G., Nestola, F., Nimis, P. & Nasdala, L. Inclusions under remnant pressure in diamond: a multi-technique approach. Eur. J. Mineral. 24, 563–573 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Nestola, F. et al. First crystal-structure determination of olivine in diamond: composition and implications for provenance in the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 305, 249–255 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Mazzucchelli, M. L. et al. Elastic geothermobarometry: corrections for the geometry of the host-inclusion system. Geology 46, 231–234 (2018).

  35. 35.

    Angel, R. J., Alvaro, M., Miletich, R. & Nestola, F. A simple and generalised P–T–V EoS for continuous phase transitions, implemented in EosFit and applied to quartz. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 172, 29 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Gonzalez-Platas, J., Alvaro, M., Nestola, F. & Angel, R. EosFit7-GUI: a new graphical user interface for equation of state calculations, analyses and teaching. J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1377–1382 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Angel, R., Alvaro, M., Nestola, F. & Mazzucchelli, M. Diamond thermoelastic properties and implications for determining the pressure of formation of diamond-inclusion systems. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 56, 211–220 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Angel, R., Nimis, P., Mazzucchelli, M., Alvaro, M. & Nestola, F. How large are departures from lithostatic pressure? Constraints from host–inclusion elasticity. J. Metamorph. Geol. 33, 801–813 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Angel, R. J., Alvaro, M. & Gonzalez-Platas, J. EosFit7c and a Fortran module (library) for equation of state calculations. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 229, 405–419 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Angel, R. J., Mazzucchelli, M. L., Alvaro, M., Nimis, P. & Nestola, F. Geobarometry from host-inclusion systems: the role of elastic relaxation. Am. Mineral. 99, 2146–2149 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Hemley, R. J. in High-Pressure Research in Mineral Physics Vol. 39 (eds Manghnani, M. H. & Syono, Y.) 347–359 (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 1987).

  42. 42.

    Sobolev, N. V. et al. Fossilized high pressure from the Earth’s deep interior: the coesite-in-diamond barometer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11875–11879 (2000).

  43. 43.

    Smith, E. M., Kopylova, M. G., Frezzotti, M. L. & Afanasiev, V. P. Fluid inclusions in Ebelyakh diamonds: evidence of CO2 liberation in eclogite and the effect of H2O on diamond habit. Lithos 216-217, 106–117 (2015).

  44. 44.

    Smith, E. M., Vendrell, C. & Johnson, P. Coesite inclusions with filaments in diamond. Gems Gemol. 52, 410–412 (2016).

  45. 45.

    D’Ippolito, V., Andreozzi, G. B., Bersani, D. & Lottici, P. P. Raman fingerprint of chromate, aluminate and ferrite spinels. J. Raman Spectrosc. 46, 1255–1264 (2015).

Download references


This research was supported by a GIA Liddicoat Postdoctoral Research Fellowship to E.M.S. Support to S.B.S. and F.N. was provided by the Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO). The European Research Council supported F.N. (INDIMEDEA, number 307322). Sincere thanks to K. S. Moe, T. Moses, M. Breeding, U. D’Haenens-Johansson, P. Johnson, K. Smit, J. Liao, S. Persaud, E. Myagkaya, A. Balter and B. Torres for analytical/logistical assistance, to N. Renfro for the micrograph of Fig. 1a, to Ascot Diamonds for lending rough samples and to M. Alvaro for discussions about geobarometry.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks E. Gaillou and T. Stachel for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information


  1. Gemological Institute of America, New York, NY, USA

    • Evan M. Smith
    •  & Wuyi Wang
  2. Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, USA

    • Steven B. Shirey
    •  & Jianhua Wang
  3. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

    • Stephen H. Richardson
  4. Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy

    • Fabrizio Nestola
  5. Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC, USA

    • Emma S. Bullock


  1. Search for Evan M. Smith in:

  2. Search for Steven B. Shirey in:

  3. Search for Stephen H. Richardson in:

  4. Search for Fabrizio Nestola in:

  5. Search for Emma S. Bullock in:

  6. Search for Jianhua Wang in:

  7. Search for Wuyi Wang in:


E.M.S. led the research, characterized the samples, conducted Raman analyses, interpreted results and wrote the initial manuscript. S.B.S. and S.H.R. contributed scientific interpretations and substantive manuscript writing. F.N. conducted X-ray diffraction and assisted with geobarometry. E.S.B. provided support for electron microprobe analysis. J.W. conducted mass spectroscopy for carbon. W.W. helped guide the project and ensured access to samples and analytical resources.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan M. Smith.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Suite of 46 type IIb diamonds studied.

    Images are not to scale. Refer to noted dimensions (max diam., maximum diameter).

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Mineralogy of mantle rocks with peridotitic and basaltic bulk composition as a function of depth.

    Numbers in boxes denote the number of diamonds observed with inclusions of the given phase, and blue shading in the boxes indicates that a thin fluid CH4 ± H2 jacket was found with the phase. We note that the division of samples between the left and right panel is for illustrative purposes, and in reality some samples (for example, with Ca-Pv alone) are not firmly categorized. See Extended Data Table 1 for a breakdown of inclusions by sample. Adapted from ref. 17.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Multiphase inclusion interpreted as former low-Ca, high-Na majoritic garnet.

    a, Optical microscope image of the inclusion, exposed on a polished facet of sample 880000037816. b, Secondary-electron image of the same inclusion, grooved with nearly horizontal polishing lines. c, d, EDS spectra of the two phases, consistent with their Raman identification as jeffbenite and NaAl-pyroxene (monoclinic, with composition between enstatite and jadeite). High Na content suggests a metabasaltic paragenesis, while low Ca content may reflect Ca partitioning into coexisting Ca-Pv at the base of the mantle transition zone or the uppermost lower mantle.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 Diamond sample 110208425476.

    a, Optical microscope image of the whole diamond, showing multiple dark inclusions of ferropericlase. b, Polishing down the table facet slightly exposed this group of four ferropericlase inclusions, shown here in an electron backscatter image. The smeared texture on the largest inclusion is a small amount of iron inadvertently deposited on the surface during polishing on a conventional cast iron scaife. c, Cathodoluminescence image of the whole diamond, revealing a complex dislocation network pattern, with interspersed healed fractures, that records a combination of both plastic and brittle deformation.

  5. Extended Data Fig. 5 Multiphase Fe–S–C–O metallic inclusion in sample 110208245246 (inclusion B).

    a, Optical microscope image of inclusion B, while still contained within the diamond host. b, Electron backscatter image of the inclusion, after polishing to expose a cross-section through it. The three main phases are colour-coded in the right panel. c, X-ray spectra obtained with EDS, showing the qualitative elemental composition of each of the three phases. Carbon is present in all spectra owing to the diamond host, diamond particles embedded in the polished surface (black specks, especially in the sulphide phase), as well as the carbon inherent to the Fe-carbide phase. d, X-ray elemental maps obtained with EDS, showing the spatial variation in signal in the region of Fe, S and O peaks (Kα1). Sulphur delineates the Fe-sulphide phase. Oxygen marks the Fe-oxide phase, while also showing the variable oxidation/tarnish layer on the sulphide portion of the inclusion.

  6. Extended Data Fig. 6 Two inclusions exhibiting a large pressure-induced shift in Raman features.

    a, CaSiO3 walstromite (thought to be former Ca-Pv) in sample 110203744064, inclusion A, with the three main peaks shifted to higher wavenumbers compared to a zero-pressure reference spectrum. This inclusion also contains CH4. b, Coesite (SiO2, thought to be former stishovite) in sample 890000180198. The inclusion analysed (circled) is about 2 µm wide and lies in a planar lobate healed crack, along with other related ‘satellite’ inclusions that presumably surrounded a nucleus coesite inclusion that was polished away when this diamond was facetted. Neighbouring coesite inclusions in b also have high, but variable, remnant pressures, as reflected by the Raman spectra. Reference spectra are from ref. 19 and RRUFF-X050094, and zero-pressure reference peak positions are taken from refs22,41.

  7. Extended Data Fig. 7 Dislocation network pattern in sample 110208245246, as seen in panchromatic cathodoluminescence.

    Each of the bright web-like lines are made up of many dislocations, and these cathodoluminescent boundaries surround darker, low-strain domains. The dark curved feature on the right of the centre is a crack (not healed).

  8. Extended Data Table 1 Suite of 46 type IIb diamond samples and inclusion summary

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Table 1

    Electron microprobe results for exposed ferropericlase inclusions in sample 110208425476 (also see Extended Data Fig. 5)

  2. Supplementary Table 2

    Electron microprobe analyses for a multiphase Fe-S-C-O inclusion in sample 110208245246.

  3. Supplementary Table 3

    Carbon isotopic compositions for 3 Type IIb diamond samples (110208425476, 110208425246, DVBT).

  4. Source Data for Figure 1

  5. Source Data for Figure 2

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.