Correction to: Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24644, published online 25 October 2017.
In this Article, owing to an error during the production process, in Fig. 1a, the dark blue and light blue wedges were incorrectly labelled as ‘G•C → T•A’ and ‘G•C → A•T’, instead of ‘C•G → T•A’ and ‘C•G → A•T’, respectively. Fig. 1 has been corrected online.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original article can be found online at .https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24644
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaudelli, N.M., Komor, A.C., Rees, H.A. et al. Publisher Correction: Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 559, E8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0070-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0070-x
This article is cited by
-
Crop bioengineering via gene editing: reshaping the future of agriculture
Plant Cell Reports (2024)
-
Accelerating crop domestication through genome editing for sustainable agriculture
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Highly efficient base editing in rabbit by using near-PAMless engineered CRISPR/Cas9 variants
Science China Life Sciences (2023)
-
Enhanced genome editing efficiency of CRISPR PLUS: Cas9 chimeric fusion proteins
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
De novo identification of essential protein domains from CRISPR-Cas9 tiling-sgRNA knockout screens
Nature Communications (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.