Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

INFECTION IN 2019

Recent research in urological infections

Many interesting studies on urological infection have been published in the past year including nonantibiotic therapy for acute cystitis, the utility of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score, specific identification of health-care-associated urinary tract infection and a multidisciplinary approach to prostatitis.

Key advances

  • A phase III trial showed that herbal therapy was noninferior to antibiotics for treatment of acute cystitis1.

  • The applicability of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score for diagnosing acute cystitis and measuring patient-reported outcome measures was assessed in two studies2,3.

  • A mathematical model was used to improve empirical antibiotic therapy by specific identification of health-care-associated urinary tract infection, which also could help to reduce antimicrobial resistance4.

  • An expert panel recommended a multidisciplinary approach to prostatitis5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Wagenlehner, F. M. et al. Non-antibiotic herbal therapy (BNO 1045) versus antibiotic therapy (fosfomycin trometamol) for the treatment of acute lower uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, multicentre, non-inferiority phase III trial. Urol. Int. 101, 327–336 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alidjanov, J. F. et al. Evaluation of the draft guidelines proposed by EMA and FDA for the clinical diagnosis of acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. World J. Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02761-3 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Alidjanov, J. F. et al. Additional assessment of acute cystitis symptom score questionnaire for patient-reported outcome measure in female patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis: part II. World J. Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02948-8 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tandogdu, Z. et al. Condition-specific surveillance in health care-associated urinary tract infections as a strategy to improve empirical antibiotic treatment: an epidemiological modelling study. World J. Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02963-9 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Magri, V. et al. Multidisciplinary approach to prostatitis. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 90, 227–248 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. European Medicines Agency. Draft guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products indicated for treatment of bacterial infections, Rev. 3. EMA https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/draft-guideline-evaluation-medicinal-products-indicated-treatment-bacterial-infections-revision-3_en.pdf (2018).

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration & Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Uncomplicated urinary tract infections: developing drugs for treatment guidance for industry. FDA https://www.fda.gov/media/129531/download (2019).

  8. Wagenlehner, F. et al. The global prevalence of infections in urology study: a long-term, worldwide surveillance study on urological infections. Pathogens 5, E10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krieger, J. N., Nyberg, L. J. & Nickel, J. C. NIH consensus definition and classification of prostatitis. JAMA 282, 236–237 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magri, V. et al. Multimodal therapy for category III chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in UPOINTS phenotyped patients. Exp. Ther. Med. 9, 658–666 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt G. Naber.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.G.N declares personal fees from Adamed, Allecra, Apogepha, Aristo, Bionorica, Biomerieux, Enteris, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Gruenenthal Mexico, Helperby, Marpinion, MerLion, Medice, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), OM Pharma/Vifor, Paratek, Roche, Saxonia and Zambon and non-financial support from Mission Pharmacal, outside the submitted work. F.M.E.W. declares other fees from Achaogen, Bionorica, OM Pharma/Vifor Pharma and Shionogi, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bionorica, Enteris BioPharma, GSK, Janssen, LeoPharma, MerLion, MSD, Pfizer, RosenPharma and VenatoRx, and other from Helperby Therapeutics and Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF; Giessen-Marburg-Langen site), outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Related links

ACSS: www.acss.world

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naber, K.G., Wagenlehner, F.M.E. Recent research in urological infections. Nat Rev Urol 17, 65–66 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0264-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0264-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing