Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

PROSTATE CANCER

Internet information on focal prostate cancer therapy: help or hindrance?

In the absence of standards of care and defined best treatments for localized prostate cancer, Internet search engines provide patients with first information — or often misinformation. Clinicians need to guide patients to sources of high-quality evidence on focal ablative treatments for prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Nassiri, N. et al. Focal therapy eligibility determined by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy. J. Urol. 199, 453–458 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lodeizen, O. et al. Ablation energies for focal treatment of prostate cancer. World J. Urol. 37, 409–418 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Valerio, M. et al. The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 66, 732–751 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sivaraman, A. & Barret, E. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: an “à la carte” approach. Eur. Urol. 69, 973–975 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bill-Axelson, A. et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer — 29-year follow-up. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2319–2329 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay, K. J. et al. Patient selection for prostate focal therapy in the era of active surveillance: an International Delphi Consensus Project. Prostate Cancer Prostat. Dis. 20, 294–299 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tay, K. J. et al. Surveillance after prostate focal therapy. World J. Urol. 37, 397–407 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, L. et al. Using Internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 14, e74 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asafu-Adjei, D. et al. Misinformation on the internet regarding ablative therapies for prostate cancer. Urology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.050 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sangeet Ghai or John Trachtenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

RELATED LINKS

Global Cancer Observatory — Cancer Today: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home

SEER Cancer Stat Facts — Prostate Cancer: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html

US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials Database: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghai, S., Trachtenberg, J. Internet information on focal prostate cancer therapy: help or hindrance?. Nat Rev Urol 16, 337–338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0180-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-019-0180-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing