Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN 2018

Targeting progression in multiple sclerosis — an update

In 2018, the distinguishing pathological features of white matter lesions in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) were refined, and serological and MRI biomarkers of clinical worsening and evolution to progressive MS were identified. We also saw therapeutic advances in progressive MS with the emergence of new neuroprotective strategies and putative markers of neurodegeneration.

Key advances

  • A pathological study showed that substantial white matter lesion activity, in the form of mixed active–inactive, smouldering and slowly expanding lesions, persists and correlates with disease severity in patients with long-standing progressive multiple sclerosis (MS)1.

  • Levels of serum neurofilament light chain, a marker of neuroaxonal damage, were found to be higher in progressive MS than in relapsing MS, to correlate with current and future clinical disability, and to predict accelerated brain and spinal cord atrophy4.

  • In patients with relapse-onset MS, a high cortical lesion count at disease onset predicted conversion to secondary progressive MS5, and in patients with primary progressive MS, baseline grey matter damage was predictive of clinical worsening after 15 years6.

  • Integration of MRI measures into the clinical evaluation of patients with MS would allow earlier prognostication of long-term clinical outcomes6, leading to possible improvements in treatment decision-making and optimization of overall costs.

  • In a phase II trial in patients with progressive MS, ibudilast treatment was associated with slower progression of brain atrophy but also had some adverse effects10; this study provides the impetus for future trials of neuroprotection in progressive MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Luchetti, S. et al. Progressive multiple sclerosis patients show substantial lesion activity that correlates with clinical disease severity and sex: a retrospective autopsy cohort analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 135, 511–528 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frischer, J. M. et al. Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann. Neurol. 78, 710–721 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Disanto, G. et al. Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 81, 857–870 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barro, C. et al. Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain 141, 2382–2391 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scalfari, A. et al. The cortical damage, early relapses, and onset of the progressive phase in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 90, e2197–e2118 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocca, M. A. et al. Long-term disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a 15-year study. Brain 140, 2814–2819 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Filippi, M. et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol. 15, 292–303 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sastre-Garriga, J. et al. Grey and white matter volume changes in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Brain 128, 1454–1460 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kappos, L. et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet 391, 1263–1273 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, R. J. et al. Phase 2 trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 846–855 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria A. Rocca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.A.R. has received speaker’s honoraria from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, Merck Serono and Roche and receives research support from the Italian Ministry of Health and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla. M.F. has received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Roche, the Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rocca, M.A., Filippi, M. Targeting progression in multiple sclerosis — an update. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 62–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0127-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0127-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research