Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Who improves from coma, how do they improve, and then what?

Nature Reviews Neurology volume 14, pages 694–696 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

A committee has developed a guideline on prolonged disorders of consciousness. Caution in prognostication is advocated because patients who have been unconscious or barely conscious for a long time might improve. The new guideline voices concern about persistent vegetative state as a clinical diagnosis but also rejects several unsupported therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Current concepts categories of persistent disorders of consciousness.

References

  1. Giacino, J. T. et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness. Neurology 91, 450–460 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wade, D. T. How often is the diagnosis of the permanent vegetative state incorrect? A review of the evidence. Eur. J. Neurol. 25, 619–625 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wijdicks, E. F. Being comatose: why definition matters. Lancet Neurol. 11, 657–658 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wijdicks, E. F. The Comatose Patient 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

  5. Bosslet, G. T. et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 191, 1318–1330 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Souter, M. J. et al. Recommendations for the critical care management of devastating brain injury: prognostication, psychosocial, and ethical management. Neurocrit. Care 23, 4–13 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fins, J. J. Rights Come to Mind: Brain Injury, Ethics and the Struggle for Consciousness (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  8. Annas, G. J. Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster, and Public Health (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Critical Care Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Eelco F. M. Wijdicks

Authors
  1. Eelco F. M. Wijdicks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eelco F. M. Wijdicks.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wijdicks, E.F.M. Who improves from coma, how do they improve, and then what?. Nat Rev Neurol 14, 694–696 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0084-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0084-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing