Optical atomic clocks, due to their unprecedented stability1,2,3 and uncertainty3,4,5,6, are already being used to test physical theories7,8 and herald a revision of the International System of Units9,10. However, to unlock their potential for cross-disciplinary applications such as relativistic geodesy11, a major challenge remains: their transformation from highly specialized instruments restricted to national metrology laboratories into flexible devices deployable in different locations12,13,14. Here, we report the first field measurement campaign with a transportable 87Sr optical lattice clock12. We use it to determine the gravity potential difference between the middle of a mountain and a location 90 km away, exploiting both local and remote clock comparisons to eliminate potential clock errors. A local comparison with a 171Yb lattice clock15 also serves as an important check on the international consistency of independently developed optical clocks. This campaign demonstrates the exciting prospects for transportable optical clocks.


The application of clocks in geodesy fulfils long-standing proposals to interpret a measurement of the relativistic redshift Δνrel between clocks at two sites as the associated gravity potential difference ΔU = c2 Δνrel/ν0 (ν0 being the clock’s frequency and c the speed of light)11. National geodetic height systems based on classical terrestrial and satellite-based measurements exhibit discrepancies at the decimetre level16. Optical clocks, combined with high-performance frequency dissemination techniques17,18, offer an attractive way to resolve these discrepancies, as they combine the advantage of high spectral resolution with small error accumulation over long distances17,19.

A clock-based approach to geodesy with a capability competitive with current techniques requires high clock performance: a fractional frequency accuracy of 1 × 10−17 corresponds to a resolution of about 10 cm in height. Furthermore, it is important to realize that the side-by-side frequency ratio has to be known to determine the remote frequency shift Δνrel. Taking the uncertainty budgets of optical clocks for granted harbours the possibility of errors, because very few have been verified experimentally to the low 10−17 region or beyond4, 6, 17,20. A transportable optical clock not only increases the flexibility in measurement sites but mitigates the risk of undetected errors by enabling local calibrations to be performed.

The test site chosen for our demonstration of chronometric levelling11 with optical clocks was the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM) in France, with the Italian metrology institute INRIM in Torino serving as the reference site. The height difference between the two sites is approximately 1,000 m, corresponding to a fractional redshift of about 10–13. From a geodetic point of view, LSM is an interesting location at which to make such measurements: first it is located in the middle of the 13 km long Fréjus road tunnel (rock coverage 1,700 m), and second the area exhibits long-term land uplift (Alpine orogeny) accompanied by a secular gravity potential variation. Furthermore, LSM lacks the metrological infrastructure to independently validate components of the clock and the environmental control on which the operation of optical clocks usually relies. The air temperature is high (26 °C), with fluctuations of several Kelvin at the transportable clock, and the humidity is very low. Working hours are also severely restricted for safety reasons, a problem that was further compounded during our measurement campaign by interruptions due to blasts caused by construction of a new tunnel nearby. Even without this additional source of seismic noise, the acoustic noise levels in the laboratory are high. The selected location thus constitutes a challenging but realistic testbed with practical relevance.

The transportable 87Sr lattice clock is (compared with laboratory clocks) designed to be compact, with robust optical parts12. The physics package is less than 0.6 m3 in size, and we use laser breadboards with mechanical stress-resistant fibre couplers21. All components except the reference cavity of the interrogation laser are rigidly mounted in a car trailer (size 2.2 m × 3 m × 2.2 m), and vibration isolation is provided by rubber dampers. The trailer interior is temperature stabilized, while the small volume of the trailer hinders air exchange and generates hot spots with more than 10 K temperature rise. However, the optics and the physics package are placed apart and shielded from these and are stable to within 0.4 K after an initial temperature rise of about 1 K. The transportable ultrastable reference cavity for the clock interrogation lasers is rigidly mounted to endure transport12. It was placed next to the trailer to avoid its performance being degraded by vibrations induced in the trailer’s air conditioning system. The vibration amplitudes in the trailer are a factor of ten larger than under typical laboratory conditions, leading to a corresponding increase in clock instability. A reference resonator with lower acceleration sensitivity or an active feed-forward system may in the future remedy this inconvenience22.

The Sr clock was operated in both locations, LSM and INRIM, to eliminate the need for a priori knowledge of the clock’s frequency. A schematic outline of the experiment is given in Fig. 1. LSM and INRIM were connected by a 150 km noise-compensated optical fibre link (see Methods). At LSM, a transportable frequency comb measured the optical frequency ratio between a laser resonant with the Sr clock transition at 698 nm and 1.542 µm radiation from an ultrastable link laser transmitted from INRIM. In this way, the frequency of the optical clock at LSM could be directly related to the frequency of the link laser even without a highly accurate absolute frequency reference. In addition to the optical carrier, the fibre link was used to disseminate a 100 MHz radiofrequency reference signal from INRIM for the frequency comb, frequency counters and acousto-optic modulators at LSM (see Methods). At INRIM, a cryogenic Cs fountain clock23 and a 171Yb optical lattice clock15 served as references. The connection between the clocks at INRIM and the link laser is provided by a second frequency comb.

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of the measurement campaign.
Fig. 1

a, For chronometric levelling, the transportable 87Sr optical lattice clock was placed in the LSM underground laboratory close to the France–Italy border in the Fréjus tunnel (top left). The clock was connected by a noise-compensated fibre link (length 150 km) to the Italian national metrology institute INRIM in Torino (red line). There, a primary Cs fountain clock and a 171Yb optical lattice clock were operated (right). At both sites, frequency combs were used to relate the frequencies of the 1S03P0 optical clock transitions and the 1.5 µm laser radiation transmitted through the link. After the remote frequency comparison, the transportable clock was moved to INRIM for a side-by-side frequency ratio measurement. b, Frequency of the transportable Sr clock as seen by the INRIM Cs fountain clock (black circles, uncertainties are one standard deviation of the combined uncertainties). The potential difference ΔU is based on the geodetic measurement. The red line shows the expected variation of the Sr clock transition frequency due to the relativistic redshift. c, The potential difference between LSM and INRIM was also determined independently by a combination of GNSS (global navigation satellite system), spirit levelling and gravimetric geoid modelling (see Methods).

Ten days after arriving at LSM in early February 2016, the first spectra of motional sidebands on the 1S03P0 clock transition were recorded from the 87Sr transportable clock, marking the point at which a recharacterization of the clock could begin. This set-up time included general logistics, powering and thermalization of the equipment, installation of reference frequency equipment, realignment of optical fibre couplings, individual testing of all subcomponents and magnetic field compensation for loading the atoms into the lattice. The operation of the lattice clock (see Methods) was similar to the procedure described in previous works12.

The transportable clock operated less reliably in the environmental conditions at LSM than in initial tests at PTB before transport. Vibrations caused by the tunnel blasting mentioned earlier led to degradation of the light delivery for the first cooling stage of the magneto-optical trap (MOT; see Methods), which in turn led to interruptions due to insufficient atom number. The low-humidity environment also hampered the air conditioning in the trailer, causing the Ti:sapphire laser used to create the optical lattice to overheat, further shortening the clock operation periods and thus the evaluation of some contributions to the clock uncertainty budget. The blackbody radiation (BBR) shift was still controlled to the level of 3 × 10−17. For these reasons, during the allocated time in the tunnel simultaneous operation was achieved only with the primary Cs fountain clock at INRIM and not with the high-stability Yb lattice clock. Although the Yb lattice clock at INRIM operated reliably for the majority of the time, the commercial lattice laser for the clock failed just before the characterization of the transportable clock had been completed. With the transportable clock operating for 2.8 h over two days at the end of the LSM campaign in mid-March 2016, the instability of the fountain clock (2.2 × 10−13τ−1/2, where τ is given in seconds) poses a limitation on the uncertainty of the frequency measurement. We therefore apply a hydrogen maser as a flywheel24 to reduce the statistical uncertainty of the measurement: the maser’s frequency is rapidly and accurately calibrated by the optical clock, and due to the frequency stability of the maser this calibration is valid for longer periods of time. This makes it possible to extend the averaging time to 48 h (see Methods), leading to an uncertainty of 17 × 10−16 associated with the measurement time. With systematic uncertainties of the Sr and Cs clocks of 2.6 × 10−16 and 3 × 10−16 respectively (see Table 1, Methods and ref. 23), the frequency of the Sr lattice clock at LSM was measured by the fountain clock at INRIM with an uncertainty of 18 × 10−16 (see Fig. 1).

Table 1 Typical uncertainty budgets of the optical clocks

As noted earlier, an initial frequency comparison at a common gravity potential is required to transform a general frequency measurement or clock comparison into a chronometric levelling measurement. For this reason, the Sr apparatus was moved to INRIM in April 2016 for local clock comparisons. There, it was directly linked to the INRIM frequency comb. In the process, small upgrades were made to the set-up for the cooling light distribution and the thermal management in the car trailer. With these changes, the availability of the Sr clock was improved significantly, allowing for several hours of data taking per day after the initial set-up phase was completed. With systematic uncertainties comparable to the first campaign and a fountain instability of 3.6 × 10−13τ−1/2, the total uncertainty was reduced by a factor of two to 9 × 10−16 (see Methods for Sr transition frequencies). In this chronometric levelling demonstration, we resolved a relativistic redshift of the optical lattice clock of 47.92(83) Hz (Fig. 1), from which we infer a potential difference of 10,034(174) m2 s−2 (The numbers in the parentheses are the 1σ uncertainties referred to the corresponding last digits of the quoted results.). This is in excellent agreement with the value of 10,032.1(16) m2 s−2 determined independently by geodetic means (see Methods). Though our result does not yet challenge the classical geodetic approach in accuracy, it is the first demonstration of chronometric levelling using a transportable optical clock.

With the increased reliability of the transportable Sr clock, we were also able to measure its optical frequency ratio R with the Yb lattice clock15 operated on the 1S03P0 transition at 578 nm. In total, 31,000 s of common operation of the two optical clocks and the frequency comb were achieved over a period of 7 days. This optical–optical comparison (Fig. 2) shows much higher stability than the optical–microwave one. Consequently, the optical frequency ratio measurement is limited by the systematic uncertainty of the clocks (Table 1), rather than by their instability. This demonstrates the key advantage of optical frequency standards: they are able to achieve excellent uncertainties in short averaging times even though they may operate less reliably than their microwave counterparts.

Fig. 2: Instability of the measured fractional Yb/Sr frequency ratio R/R0.
Fig. 2

a, Fractional optical frequency ratio R/R0, averaged over 16 s intervals, as a function of the modified Julian date MJD. Here, R0 = 1.207,507,039,343,338,122 as derived from the CIPM recommended frequencies for the 171Yb and 87Sr lattice clocks26. b, Fractional instability of R/R0 (circles) derived from the concatenated data set in a and expressed as the Allan deviation σ y . Error bars denote one standard deviation. The red line depicts an instability of 2 × 10–14 τ–1/2. The instability of R/R0 arises from the instabilities of the two clocks involved in the comparison as well as the measurement chain. The stability of each individual clock depends on its clock laser, and separating their contributions is not straightforward. The instability of the Sr clock is estimated to be about 7 × 10–15 τ–1/2 from the instability of the frequency offset between the Sr clock transition and the clock laser reference cavity, after removing a linear cavity drift. The contribution from the Yb clock is probably more than 1 × 10–14 τ–1/2.

The 171Yb/87Sr frequency ratios measured on different days are summarized in Fig. 3, which also shows previous measurements of this ratio. After averaging (see Methods), we determine the ratio to be R = νYb/ νSr = 1.207,507,039,343,338,41(34). Independent measurements of particular optical frequency ratios are important to check the consistency of optical clocks worldwide25, and are key to establishing more accurate representations of the second26 as provided by the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) as a step towards a future redefinition of the second. To our knowledge, this is the only optical frequency ratio that has been measured directly by three independent research groups27,28,29; however, our measurement differs from the most accurate previous measurement by two standard deviations (Fig. 3), and the origin of this difference will require further investigation by the research groups concerned.

Fig. 3: Comparison of frequency ratios R between 171Yb and 87Sr lattice clocks.
Fig. 3

a, Averages of the ratios measured on different days (diamonds and circles) and their overall average (line) with its respective uncertainty (coloured bar). Diamonds (circles) denote the operation of the Sr lattice clock with a shallow (deep) lattice (see Methods). b, Optical frequency ratios between 171Yb and 87Sr have been measured directly in only three groups so far (RIKEN 201627 and 201528, NMIJ 201429 and this work). The lowest point shows the ratio as inferred from averaging all published absolute frequency measurements for 171Yb and 87Sr (see Methods). All error bars represent one standard deviation of the total measurement uncertainty.

Note that, even with the only slightly improved transportable Sr apparatus as used at INRIM, chronometric levelling against the Yb lattice clock with considerably improved resolution would be possible. We expect that the transportable clock with improved reliability will be able to achieve an uncertainty of 1 × 10−17 before, for example, BBR-related uncertainties pose a limitation to the present set-up. Instabilities of 1 × 10–15τ–1/2 are realistic with the current interrogation laser; lower instabilities will require an improved reference cavity. The uncertainty will enable height differences of 10 cm to be resolved, which is a relevant magnitude for geodesy in regions such as islands, which are hard to access using conventional geodetic approaches. As metrological fibre links become more common, chronometric levelling along their paths30 will become a realistic prospect.


Operation of lattice clocks

The realization and operation of the 171Yb (I = 1/2) and 87Sr (I = 9/2) clocks are very similar and have been presented in detail12, 15,21. Ytterbium and strontium atoms are cooled to microkelvin temperatures in two-stage MOTs, exploiting the strong 1S01P1 and weaker 1S03P1 transitions (at 399 nm and 556 nm for Yb and 461 nm and 689 nm for Sr, respectively). The atoms are then trapped in one-dimensional optical lattices operating at the magic wavelengths31λYbmagic ≈ 759 nm and λSrmagic ≈ 813 nm, which to first order give a zero differential light shift between the 1S0 and 3P0 states.

Finally, the atoms are prepared for spectroscopy in a single magnetic sublevel mf by optical pumping. As a result, shifts due to cold collisions and line pulling are reduced. The two π transitions from the mf = ±1/2 sublevels in Yb (mf = ±9/2 in Sr) are probed alternately at approximately halfwidth detunings so that the interrogation laser is locked to their average transition frequency. This effectively removes the linear Zeeman shift.

Uncertainties of lattice clocks

Here, we discuss the most important uncertainty contributions listed in Table 1. More details of the methods used to evaluate these uncertainties are given in refs 15,24 and 12.

Lattice light shifts

The lattice of the Yb clock is operated at νl = 394,798.238 GHz with a trap depth U0 = 196(4)Er (Er being the lattice recoil energy) and an atomic temperature of 7(3) µK as determined by sideband spectroscopy32. We measured the linear shift near the magic wavelength while the non-linear induced lattice light shift can be calculated using data from ref. 27.

For the Sr lattice clock, the typical lattice depth was about 100Er as measured from sideband spectra32. These also yielded an atomic temperature of about 3.5 µK. The light-shift cancellation frequency was determined earlier; a reference resonator served as a wavelength reference during the experiments discussed here. The uncertainty of the linear lattice light shift allows for a possible resonator frequency change of 50 MHz caused by vibrations and shocks during transport and changes due to potential variations of the scalar and tensor light shift caused by geometrical changes or changes of the environmental magnetic field33. Without transport, the resonator frequency stays stable within 1 MHz for weeks, but relaxation during transport cannot be excluded. In future measurement campaigns, a determination of the light-shift cancellation wavelength will be made at the site of measurement. Higher-order light shifts were calculated using the coefficients in the same reference. As a check, three of the measurements in Fig. 2 were performed with a deeper lattice of about 160Er, which resulted in uncertainties for the linear lattice light shift and higher-order shifts of 29 × 10−17 and 1 × 10−17, respectively. No significant variation of the measured frequency ratio R was observed.

Density shift

The density shift was evaluated in both lattice clocks by varying the interrogated atom number. Corrections for changes of the atomic temperature have been applied for the Sr clock. The lower uncertainty of the density shift at LSM is due to the lower atom number and thus density with which the clock was operated there.

BBR shift

The influence of BBR on the clock frequency has been discussed elsewhere3,4,64,35,36. Temperatures of the atomic environment were measured with calibrated platinum resistance thermometers. The uncertainty of the BBR shift is mostly related to temperature inhomogeneity. The representative temperature and its uncertainty are derived from the extreme temperatures found on the apparatus (the atomic oven is treated separately12,15) following the procedure described in ref. 37 for a rectangular probability distribution. The difference between the BBR corrections at LSM and INRIM is caused by different temperatures inside the trailer, as this temperature depends slightly on the outside temperature.

Other uncertainties

The uncertainties of servo error, second-order Zeeman shift and line pulling are reduced at INRIM by adjustments of experimental parameters, which were possible due to the more reliable operation.

H-maser as flywheel

A flywheel oscillator with good stability and high reliability, such as an H-maser, can be used to extend the averaging time between a less reliable system such as our Sr lattice clock and a Cs primary clock with lower stability24. The frequency ratio νSr/νCs was thus determined from the frequency ratios νSr/νH and νH/νCs using datasets with different lengths. The noise of the flywheel results in different average frequencies for these two intervals, but the additional uncertainty can be calculated24 if the noise is well characterized, as it often is for masers. The calculation relies on Parseval’s theorem, and uses the noise spectrum of the maser together with the Fourier transform of a weighting function that represents the two averaging intervals. For the full measurement-related uncertainty, this extrapolation uncertainty is combined with the statistical uncertainties of the maser calibration by the optical clock and the maser–Cs clock ratio over the extended interval. We modelled the maser noise by a superposition of flicker phase noise 6 × 10−14τ−1 (1 × 10−13τ−1), white frequency noise 5 × 10−14τ−1/2 (4.5 × 10−14τ−1/2) and a flicker noise 1.7 × 10−15 (1 × 10−15) in March (May) 2016, respectively.

Gravity potential determination

To provide an accurate reference for the chronometric levelling, a state-of-the-art determination of the gravity (gravitational plus centrifugal) potential was performed, targeting the best possible uncertainty for each clock site. Spatial variations of the gravity potential are most important; corresponding temporal variations (mainly due to solid Earth and ocean tides) are below 0.07 m2 s−2 for the potential difference between INRIM and LSM38.

The static (spatially varying) gravity potential or corresponding potential differences can be determined by two classical geodetic methods39. The first is geometric levelling (together with gravity observations along the levelling path). The second (the so-called GNSS/geoid approach) uses GNSS positions (ellipsoidal heights) and the results from gravity field modelling, that is, a high-resolution (quasi)geoid model based on terrestrial and satellite gravity data. Both methods can be formulated in terms of either potential or height quantities. In the following discussion, metric units based on heights are generally preferred for simplicity, but corresponding potential values can easily be obtained by multiplying the height values by an average gravity value (e.g. 9.81 m s–2). Geometric levelling is accurate at the millimetre level over short distances40, but as a differential technique it can deliver only potential differences and is susceptible to systematic errors, which may accumulate to the few-decimetre level over continental distances. On the other hand, the GNSS/geoid approach can deliver absolute potential values; in this case the uncertainty depends mainly on the quality of the regional (quasi)geoid models, but the uncertainty of the GNSS positions also has to be considered.

New gravity measurements were made around the clock sites at INRIM and LSM to improve the reliability and uncertainty of the geopotential field modelling. These measurements included spot checks of the largely historic gravity database (consistency check), and the addition of new observations in areas so far void of gravity data (coverage improvement). Separate gravity surveys were carried out around INRIM and LSM, resulting in 36 and 123 new gravity points, respectively. The gravity surveys included one absolute gravity observation at INRIM and another at LSM, while the remaining points were observed with relative gravity meters (relative to the established absolute points), with 11 gravity points being located inside the Fréjus tunnel. Maps giving an overview of the distribution of gravity observations are given on the ITOC project page41. These new gravity observations as well as some other gravity updates (e.g. for Germany) were integrated into the terrestrial gravity database, the starting point being the version used to compute the previous European Gravimetric (Quasi)Geoid, EGG200816. A consistency check between the new and existing gravity measurements showed no significant differences between the two data sets, confirming the quality of the entire database. However, a re-evaluation of the combined data-set revealed some old stations with obviously wrong positions, mainly located in France; these stations lie offroad and show large discrepancies between station and digital elevation model heights, and were therefore excluded from the (quasi)geoid computation.

A new (quasi)geoid model, EGG2015, was computed in a similar way to the previous EGG2008 model, using the remove–compute–restore procedure and the spectral combination approach, combining a global long-wavelength satellite gravity model with high-resolution terrestrial gravity and terrain data16. In addition to the new gravity measurements, enhancements included the use of a fifth-generation GOCE global geopotential model (GOCO05S)42 and a spectral weighting scheme adapted to the GOCE model. The largest difference between the EGG2015 and EGG2008 input gravity values is about 3.5 × 10−4 m s−2; for the output (quasi)geoid grids the largest difference is about 0.15 m. By far the largest differences are around the LSM site; they result from the new observations in areas previously void of gravity data and from the removal of gross errors related to some points in France with incorrect positions16. However, the maximum (quasi)geoid change at the two clock sites was less than 0.03 m. The uncertainty of EGG2015 was estimated in the same way as for EGG2008, resulting in a standard deviation of 2 cm, which holds for areas with a good coverage and quality of the terrestrial gravity field data, such as around INRIM (best-case scenario). However, around LSM the remaining data gaps in inaccessible areas and the strong spatial gravity field variation caused by the high mountains lead to a higher uncertainty estimate of about 4 cm.

The final relativistic redshift correction for the INRIM/LSM clock comparison was derived by the GNSS/geoid approach, although geometric levelling and gravity measurements were used to transfer the gravity potential from the nearest GNSS stations to the reference markers adjacent to the clocks at INRIM and LSM. The GNSS/geoid approach was chosen because the levelling data for Italy are rather old and do not include gravity corrections43, and because the GNSS/geoid approach is not affected by systematic levelling errors. This resulted in a gravity potential difference of 10,029.7(6) m2 s−2 between the two reference markers, and 10,032.1(16)m2 s−2 between the actual clock positions at LSM and INRIM, respectively. The final uncertainty of the gravity potential difference between the reference markers nearest to the two clock positions (about 6 cm in terms of height) includes contributions from the (quasi)geoid in the Alpine region (approximately 5 cm, neglecting correlations16), the GNSS positions (1–2 cm) and the levelling connections (<1 cm, mainly from the tunnel portal to LSM). The larger uncertainty for the actual clock positions is because, for convenience and in view of the uncertainty of the chronometric levelling experiment, the height differences between the clock locations and the corresponding reference markers (less than 10 m apart) were determined using a simple spirit level rather than by geodetic levelling.

INRIM–LSM frequency transfer

The remote clock comparison was performed by comparing the frequency of a link laser at 1,542.14 nm, sent from INRIM to LSM by a telecom optical fibre, with the frequencies of the clocks operated in the two locations. Two fibre frequency combs spanned the spectral gaps between the link laser and the clock interrogation lasers. The combs employed the transfer oscillator principle44, making the measurements of the optical frequency ratios immune to the frequency noise of the combs. The frequency of the link laser was stabilized using a high-finesse cavity, whose long-term drift is removed by a loose phase-lock to a H-maser via a fibre frequency comb. As a result, the beat notes with the combs remained within a small frequency interval, facilitating long-term operation and reducing potential errors arising from any counter de-synchronization between INRIM and LSM17.

The link laser used a multiplexed channel in the telecom fibre. Its path was equipped with two dedicated bidirectional erbium-doped fibre amplifiers that allowed a phase stable signal to be generated at LSM through the Doppler noise cancellation technique17,18. The contribution of fibre frequency transfer to the total fractional uncertainty was assessed to be 3 × 10–19 by looping back the signal from LSM using a parallel fibre. The occasional occurrence of cycle slips was detected by redundant counting of the beat note at INRIM. At LSM, the signal was regenerated by a diode laser phase locked to the incoming radiation with a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 30 dB at 100 kHz bandwidth; this ensured robust and cycle-slip-free operation.

In addition to the optical reference, a high-quality radiofrequency signal was needed at LSM to operate the Sr clock apparatus (frequency shifters and counters) and the frequency comb. Given the impossibility of having a GNSS-disseminated signal in the underground laboratory, a 100 MHz radiofrequency signal was delivered there by amplitude modulation of a second 1.5 µm laser that was transmitted through an optical fibre parallel to the first. At LSM, the amplitude modulation was detected on a fast photodiode, amplified and regenerated by an oven-controlled quartz oscillator at 10 MHz to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The inherent stability of the free-running fibre link is in this case enough to deliver the radiofrequency signal with a long-term instability and uncertainty smaller than 10-13. This resulting uncertainty contribution to the optical frequency ratio measurement is below 1 × 10–19.

Averaging of the optical frequency ratio data

We made eight different optical frequency ratio measurements with a total measurement time of 15 h over a period of one week in May 2016 (Fig. 3). The data acquired on different days have different statistical and systematic uncertainties. We applied a statistical analysis that considers the correlations between the measurements from the different systematic shifts where the covariance matrix of the eight daily measurements is used to calculate a generalized least squares fit for the average25,45. We regarded the systematic uncertainties of the clocks (Table 1) as fully correlated, while the statistics related to the measurement duration were uncorrelated.

Absolute frequency of the Sr lattice clock

The chronometric levelling can be viewed from an alternative perspective: If we assume that the conventional measurement of the gravity potential difference is correct then we can deduce an average absolute frequency value of 429,228,004,229,873.13(40) Hz for the Sr lattice clock. The accuracy of the absolute frequency measurement achieved with the transportable clock is comparable to several recent measurements with laboratory systems24,43,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61.

Averaging the previously published values gives a frequency of 429,228,004,229,873.05(05) Hz. Together with the average Yb clock transition frequency of 518,295,836,590,863.75(25) Hz derived from other references15,59,63,64,65,66, a Yb/Sr frequency ratio of 1.207,507,039,343,337,97(61) can be calculated (Fig. 3). This averaging assumes that there are no correlations between the different measurements.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Schioppo, M. et al. Ultra-stable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles. Nat. Photon. 11, 48–52 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Al-Masoudi, A., Dörscher, S., Häfner, S., Sterr, U. & Lisdat, C. Noise and instability of an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. A 92, 063814 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Nicholson, T. L. et al. Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 6, 6896 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Ushijima, I., Takamoto, M., Das, M., Ohkubo, T. & Katori, H. Cryogenic optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 9, 185–189 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Huntemann, N., Sanner, C., Lipphardt, B., Tamm, C. & Peik, E. Single-ion atomic clock with 3 × 10−18 systematic uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063001 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Koelemeij, J. C. J., Wineland, D. J. & Rosenband, T. Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al+ optical clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070802 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Huntemann, N. et al. Improved limit on a temporal variation of m p/m e from comparisons of Yb+ and Cs atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210802 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Godun, R. M. et al. Frequency ratio of two optical clock transitions in 171Yb+ and constraints on the time-variation of fundamental constants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210801 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Riehle, F. Towards a redefinition of the second based on optical atomic clocks. C. R. Phys. 16, 506–515 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Margolis, H. Timekeepers of the future. Nat. Phys. 10, 82–83 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Vermeer, M. Chronometric levelling. Rep. Finn. Geod. Inst. 83, 2 (1983).

  12. 12.

    Koller, S. B. et al. Transportable optical lattice clock with 7 × 10−17 uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 073601 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Cao, J. et al. A transportable 40Ca+ single-ion clock with 7.7 × 10−17 systematic uncertainty. Appl. Phys. B 123, 112 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Bongs, K. et al. Development of a strontium optical lattice clock for the SOC mission on the ISS. C. R. Phys. 16, 553–564 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Pizzocaro, M. et al. Absolute frequency measurement of the 1S03P0 transition of 171Yb. Metrologia 54, 102–112 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Denker, H. in Sciences of Geodesy – II (ed. Xu, G.) Ch. 5 (Springer, 2013).

  17. 17.

    Lisdat, C. et al. A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science. Nat. Commun. 7, 12443 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Calonico, D. et al. High-accuracy coherent optical frequency transfer over a doubled 642-km fiber link. Appl. Phys. B 117, 979–986 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Takano, T. et al. Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 10, 662–666 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Barwood, G. P. et al. Agreement between two 88Sr+ optical clocks to 4 parts in 1017. Phys. Rev. A 89, 050501 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Vogt, S. et al. A transportable optical lattice clock. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723, 012020 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Leibrandt, D. R., Bergquist, J. C. & Rosenband, T. Cavity-stabilized laser with acceleration sensitivity below 10−12 g−1. Phys. Rev. A 87, 023829 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Levi, F. et al. Accuracy evaluation of ITCsF2: a nitrogen cooled caesium fountain. Metrologia 51, 270 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Grebing, C. et al. Realization of a timescale with an accurate optical lattice clock. Optica 3, 563–569 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Margolis, H. S. & Gill, P. Least-squares analysis of clock frequency comparison data to deduce optimized frequency and frequency ratio values. Metrologia 52, 628–634 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Report of the 104 th Meeting of the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) (BIPM, 2015).

  27. 27.

    Nemitz, N. et al. Frequency ratio of Yb and Sr clocks with 5 × 10−17 uncertainty at 150 s averaging time. Nat. Photon-. 10, 258–261 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Takamoto, M. et al. Frequency ratios of Sr, Yb, and Hg based optical lattice clocks and their applications. C. R. Phys. 16, 489–498 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Akamatsu, D. et al. Frequency ratio measurement of 171Yb and 87Sr optical lattice clocks. Opt. Express 22, 7898–7905 (2014); erratum 22, 32199–32199 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Grosche, G. Eavesdropping time and frequency: phase noise cancellation along a time-varying path, such as an optical fiber. Opt. Lett. 39, 2545–2548 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Katori, H., Takamoto, M., Pal’chikov, V. G. & Ovsiannikov, V. D. Ultrastable optical clock with neutral atoms in an engineered light shift trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003).

  32. 32.

    Blatt, S. et al. Rabi spectroscopy and excitation inhomogeneity in a one-dimensional optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. A 80, 052703 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Westergaard, P. G. et al. Lattice-induced frequency shifts in Sr optical lattice clocks at the 10−17 level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210801 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Middelmann, T., Falke, S., Lisdat, C. & Sterr, U. High accuracy correction of blackbody radiation shift in an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 263004 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Safronova, M. S., Porsev, S. G., Safronova, S. U., Kozlov, M. G. & Clark, C. W. Blackbody radiation shift in the Sr optical atomic clock. Phys. Rev. A 87, 012509 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Sherman, J. A. et al. High accuracy measure of atomic polarizability in an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153002 (2012).

  37. 37.

    JCGM (BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML) Evaluation of Measurement DataGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement Vol. 100 (International Organization for Standardization, 2008); http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf

  38. 38.

    Voigt, C., Denker, H. & Timmen, L. Time-variable gravity potential components for optical clock comparisons and the definition of international time scales. Metrologia 53, 1365–1383 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Denker, H. et al. Geodetic methods to determine the relativistic redshift at the level of 10–18 in the context of international timescales—a review and practical results. J. Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1075-1 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Torge, W. & Müller, J. Geodesy 4th edn (De Gruyter, 2012).

  41. 41.

    European Metrology Research Programme Project SIB-55 International Timescales with Optical Clocks (2016); http://projects.npl.co.uk/itoc/project-structure/reg/gravity-observations/

  42. 42.

    Mayer-Gürr, T. et al. The combined satellite gravity field model GOCO05s. Geophys. Res. Abstracts 17, EGU2015–12364 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Barzaghi, R. et al. Orthometric correction and normal heights for Italian levelling network: a case study. Appl. Geomat. 6, 17–25 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Stenger, J., Schnatz, H., Tamm, C. & Telle, H. R. Ultra-precise measurement of optical frequency ratios. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 073601 (2002).

  45. 45.

    Cox, M. G., Eiø, C., Mana, G. & Pennecchi, F. The generalized weighted mean of correlated quantities. Metrologia 43, S268 (2006).

  46. 46.

    Boyd, M. M. et al. 87Sr lattice clock with inaccuracy below 10−15. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 083002 (2007).

  47. 47.

    Baillard, X. et al. An optical lattice clock with spin-polarized 87Sr atoms. Eur. Phys. J. D. 48, 11–17 (2008).

  48. 48.

    Campbell, G. K. et al. The absolute frequency of the 87Sr optical clock transition. Metrologia 45, 539–548 (2008).

  49. 49.

    Hong, F.-L. et al. Measuring the frequency of a Sr optical lattice clock using a 120 km coherent optical transfer. Opt. Lett. 34, 692–694 (2009).

  50. 50.

    Falke, S. et al. The 87Sr optical frequency standard at PTB. Metrologia 48, 399–407 (2011).

  51. 51.

    Yamaguchi, A. et al. Stability transfer between two clock lasers operating at different wavelengths for absolute frequency measurement of clock transition in 87Sr. Appl. Phys. Express 5, 022701 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Matsubara, K. et al. Direct comparison of a Ca+ single-ion clock against a Sr lattice clock to verify the absolute frequency measurement. Opt. Express 20, 22034–22041 (2012).

  53. 53.

    Le Targat, R. et al. Experimental realization of an optical second with strontium lattice clocks. Nat. Commun. 4, 2109 (2013).

  54. 54.

    Falke, S. et al. A strontium lattice clock with 3 × 10−17 inaccuracy and its frequency. New J. Phys. 16, 073023 (2014).

  55. 55.

    Akamatsu, D. et al. Spectroscopy and frequency measurement of the 87Sr clock transition by laser linewidth transfer using an optical frequency comb. Appl. Phys. Express 7, 012401 (2014).

  56. 56.

    Hachisu, H. et al. Direct comparison of optical lattice clocks with an intercontinental baseline of 9000 km. Opt. Lett. 39, 4072–4075 (2014).

  57. 57.

    Lin, Y.-G. et al. First evaluation and frequency measurement of the strontium optical lattice clock at NIM. Chin. Phys. Lett. 32, 090601 (2015).

  58. 58.

    Tanabe, T. et al. Improved frequency measurement of the 1S03P0 clock transition in 87Sr using a Cs fountain clock as a transfer oscillator. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 115002 (2015).

  59. 59.

    Lodewyck, J. et al. Optical to microwave clock frequency ratios with a nearly continuous strontium optical lattice clock. Metrologia 53, 1123 (2016).

  60. 60.

    Hachisu, H., Petit, G. & Ido, T. Absolute frequency measurement with uncertainty below 1 × 10−15 using International Atomic Time. Appl. Phys. B 123, 34 (2017).

  61. 61.

    Hachisu, H., Petit, G., Nakagawa, F., Hanado, Y. & Ido, T. SI-traceable measurement of an optical frequency at the low 10−16 level without a local primary standard. Opt. Express 25, 8511–8523 (2017).

  62. 62.

    Kohno, T. et al. One-dimensional optical lattice clock with a fermionic 171Yb isotope. Appl. Phys. Express 2, 072501 (2009).

  63. 63.

    Lemke, N. D. et al. Spin-1/2 optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 063001 (2009).

  64. 64.

    Yasuda, M. et al. Improved absolute frequency measurement of the 171Yb optical lattice clock towards a candidate for the redefinition of the second. Appl. Phys. Express 5, 102401 (2012).

  65. 65.

    Park, C. Y. et al. Absolute frequency measurement of 1S0 (F = 1/2) mm–3P0 (F = 1/2) transition of 171Yb atoms in a one-dimensional optical lattice at KRISS. Metrologia 50, 119–128 (2013).

  66. 66.

    Kim, H. et al. Improved absolute frequency measurement of the 171Yb optical lattice clock at KRISS relative to the SI second. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 56, 050302 (2017).

Download references


We would like to thank T. Zampieri for his technical support at LSM and A. Mura and Consorzio TOP-IX for technical help in the access to the optical fibre. The authors acknowledge funding from European Metrology Research Program (EMRP) Project SIB55 ITOC, the EU Innovative Training Network (ITN) Future Atomic Clock Technology (FACT), the DFG funded CRC 1128 geo-Q (Projects A03 and C04) and RTG 1728 and the UK National Measurement System Quantum, Electromagnetics and Time Programme. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union.

Author information


  1. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany

    • Jacopo Grotti
    • , Silvio Koller
    • , Stefan Vogt
    • , Sebastian Häfner
    • , Uwe Sterr
    •  & Christian Lisdat
  2. Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    • Heiner Denker
    • , Christian Voigt
    •  & Ludger Timmen
  3. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

    • Christian Voigt
  4. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK

    • Antoine Rolland
    • , Fred N. Baynes
    •  & Helen S. Margolis
  5. Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane, Carré Sciences, Modane, France

    • Michel Zampaolo
  6. Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Physical Metrology Division, Torino, Italy

    • Pierre Thoumany
    • , Marco Pizzocaro
    • , Benjamin Rauf
    • , Filippo Bregolin
    • , Anna Tampellini
    • , Piero Barbieri
    • , Massimo Zucco
    • , Giovanni A. Costanzo
    • , Cecilia Clivati
    • , Filippo Levi
    •  & Davide Calonico
  7. Dipartimento di Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy

    • Benjamin Rauf
    • , Filippo Bregolin
    • , Anna Tampellini
    • , Piero Barbieri
    •  & Giovanni A. Costanzo


  1. Search for Jacopo Grotti in:

  2. Search for Silvio Koller in:

  3. Search for Stefan Vogt in:

  4. Search for Sebastian Häfner in:

  5. Search for Uwe Sterr in:

  6. Search for Christian Lisdat in:

  7. Search for Heiner Denker in:

  8. Search for Christian Voigt in:

  9. Search for Ludger Timmen in:

  10. Search for Antoine Rolland in:

  11. Search for Fred N. Baynes in:

  12. Search for Helen S. Margolis in:

  13. Search for Michel Zampaolo in:

  14. Search for Pierre Thoumany in:

  15. Search for Marco Pizzocaro in:

  16. Search for Benjamin Rauf in:

  17. Search for Filippo Bregolin in:

  18. Search for Anna Tampellini in:

  19. Search for Piero Barbieri in:

  20. Search for Massimo Zucco in:

  21. Search for Giovanni A. Costanzo in:

  22. Search for Cecilia Clivati in:

  23. Search for Filippo Levi in:

  24. Search for Davide Calonico in:


D.C. coordinated the measurement campaign with contributions from C.L., H.S.M. and Mi.Z.; J.G., S.K., S.V., S.H., U.S. and C.L. designed, built and operated the transportable Sr lattice clock; H.D., C.V. and L.T. made the geodetic measurements and calculated the local gravity potential values; A.R., F.N.B. and H.S.M. prepared, characterized and operated the transportable frequency comb; M.P., P.T., B.R., F.B., and D.C. designed, built and operated the Yb lattice clock; G.A.C. and F.L. designed, built and operated the INRIM Cs fountain, C.C. and A.T. designed, characterized and operated the optical fibre link between INRIM and LSM; C.C., P.B. and Ma.Z. operated the frequency comb at INRIM. J.G., C.C., M.P., F.L., A.R., F.N.B., H.S.M., S.K. and C.L. contributed to the data analysis for the ratio and absolute frequency measurement. C.L. wrote the paper with support from H.S.M. and D.C. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lisdat.