Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Strain-level diversity drives alternative community types in millimetre-scale granular biofilms

Abstract

Microbial communities are often highly diverse in their composition, both at a coarse-grained taxonomic level, such as genus, and at a highly resolved level, such as strains, within species. This variability can be driven by either extrinsic factors such as temperature and or by intrinsic ones, for example demographic fluctuations or ecological interactions. The relative contributions of these factors and the taxonomic level at which they influence community composition remain poorly understood, in part because of the difficulty in identifying true community replicates assembled under the same environmental parameters. Here, we address this problem using an activated granular sludge reactor in which millimetre-scale biofilm granules represent true community replicates. Differences in composition are then expected to be driven primarily by biotic factors. Using 142 shotgun metagenomes of single biofilm granules we found that, at the commonly used genus-level resolution, community replicates varied much more in their composition than would be expected from neutral assembly processes. This variation did not translate into any clear partitioning into discrete community types, that is, distinct compositional states, such as enterotypes in the human gut. However, a strong partition into community types did emerge at the strain level for the dominant organism: genotypes of Candidatus Accumulibacter that coexisted in the metacommunity (the reactor) excluded each other within community replicates (granules). Individual granule communities maintained a significant lineage structure, whereby the strain phylogeny of Accumulibacter correlated with the overall composition of the community, indicating a high potential for co-diversification among species and communities. Our results suggest that due to the high functional redundancy and competition between close relatives, alternative community types are most probably observed at the level of recently differentiated genotypes but not at higher orders of genetic resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: High degree of variability among replicate communities at the genus level.
Fig. 2: Strains of Accumulibacter segregate among community replicates.
Fig. 3: Accumulibacter strain-level phylogeny correlates with compositional structure.
Fig. 4: Schematic view of the relationship between phylogenetic depth and community structure.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw sequencing reads are available on the European Nucleotide Archive (project PRJEB24825). Granule metadata and a list of the accession numbers of the genomes in the reference database are provided as Supplementary Data.

References

  1. Konopka, A. What is microbial community ecology? ISME J. 3, 1223–1230 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Selander, R. K. & Levin, B. R. Genetic diversity and structure in Escherichia coli populations. Science 210, 545–547 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McInerney, J. O., McNally, A. & O’Connell, M. J. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17040 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raes, J., Letunic, I., Yamada, T., Jensen, L. J. & Bork, P. Toward molecular trait-based ecology through integration of biogeochemical, geographical and metagenomic data. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 473 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W. & Doebeli, M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science 353, 1272–1277 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubbell, S. P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001).

  7. Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P. & Etienne, R. S. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 340–348 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faust, K. & Raes, J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 538–550 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nemergut, D. R. et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 342–356 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, J. R. et al. Genotypic diversity within a natural coastal bacterioplankton population. Science 307, 1311–1313 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tettelin, H., Riley, D., Cattuto, C. & Medini, D. Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 472–477 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shapiro, B. J. et al. Population genomics of early events in the ecological differentiation of bacteria. Science 336, 48–51 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45–50 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo, C. et al. ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1045–1052 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nayfach, S., Rodriguez-Mueller, B., Garud, N. & Pollard, K. S. An integrated metagenomics pipeline for strain profiling reveals novel patterns of bacterial transmission and biogeography. Genome Res. 26, 1612–1625 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davoll, P. J. & Silver, M. Marine snow aggregates: life history sequence and microbial community of abandoned larvacean houses from Monterey Bay, California. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 33, 111–120 (1986).

  17. Tisdall, J. M. & Oades, J. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 33, 141–163 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh, P. D. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community—implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 6, S14 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cordero, O. X. & Datta, M. S. Microbial interactions and community assembly at microscales. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 227–234 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Gil, G. & Holliger, C. Aerobic granules: microbial landscape and architecture, stages, and practical implications. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3433–3441 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lochmatter, S. & Holliger, C. Optimization of operation conditions for the startup of aerobic granular sludge reactors biologically removing carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous. Water Res. 59, 58–70 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hesselmann, R. P., Werlen, C., Hahn, D., van der Meer, J. R. & Zehnder, A. J. Enrichment, phylogenetic analysis and detection of a bacterium that performs enhanced biological phosphate removal in activated sludge. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22, 454–465 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez-Gil, G. & Holliger, C. Dynamics of microbial community structure of and enhanced biological phosphorus removal by aerobic granules cultivated on propionate or acetate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 8041–8051 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flowers, J. J. et al. Comparative genomics of two 'Candidatus Accumulibacter' clades performing biological phosphorus removal. ISME J. 7, 2301–2314 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weissbrodt, D. G., Neu, T. R., Kuhlicke, U., Rappaz, Y. & Holliger, C. Assessment of bacterial and structural dynamics in aerobic granular biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 4, 175 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weissbrodt, D. G., Schneiter, G. S., Fürbringer, J.-M. & Holliger, C. Identification of trigger factors selecting for polyphosphate- and glycogen-accumulating organisms in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Water Res. 47, 7006–7018 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. He, S., Gall, D. L. & McMahon, K. D. ‘Candidatus Accumulibacter’ population structure in enhanced biological phosphorus removal sludges as revealed by polyphosphate kinase genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5865–5874 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McMahon, K. D. et al. Polyphosphate kinase genes from full-scale activated sludge plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 167–173 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebrahimi, S. et al. Performance and microbial community composition dynamics of aerobic granular sludge from sequencing batch bubble column reactors operated at 20 degrees C, 30 degrees C, and 35 degrees C. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 1555–1568 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sloan, W. T. et al. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 732–740 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cordero, O. X. & Polz, M. F. Explaining microbial genomic diversity in light of evolutionary ecology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 263–273 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Skennerton, C. T., Barr, J. J., Slater, F. R., Bond, P. L. & Tyson, G. W. Expanding our view of genomic diversity in Candidatus Accumulibacter clades. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 1574–1585 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peterson, S. B., Warnecke, F., Madejska, J., McMahon, K. D. & Hugenholtz, P. Environmental distribution and population biology of Candidatus Accumulibacter, a primary agent of biological phosphorus removal. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2692–2703 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao, Y., Graham, D. W., Tamaki, H. & Zhang, T. Dominant and novel clades of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis in 18 globally distributed full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Rep. 5, 11857 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martiny, J. B. H. et al. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 102–112 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Koren, O. et al. A guide to enterotypes across the human body: meta-analysis of microbial community structures in human microbiome datasets. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002863 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Flowers, J. J., He, S., Yilmaz, S., Noguera, D. R. & McMahon, K. D. Denitrification capabilities of two biological phosphorus removal sludges dominated by different ‘Candidatus Accumulibacter’ clades. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1, 583–588 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oehmen, A., Carvalho, G., Freitas, F. & Reis, M. A. M. Assessing the abundance and activity of denitrifying polyphosphate accumulating organisms through molecular and chemical techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 61, 2061–2068 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer, F. et al. The metagenomics RAST server—a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 386 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McIlroy, S. J. et al. ‘Candidatus Competibacter’-lineage genomes retrieved from metagenomes reveal functional metabolic diversity. ISME J. 8, 613–624 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leventhal, G. E. gentools: Various Tools for Parsing Genomic Data and Extracting Interesting Information (accessed 29 August 2018); https://www.bitbucket.org/gaberoo/gentools

  45. Langrognet, F., Lebret, R., Poli, C. & Iovleff, S. Rmixmod: Supervised, Unsupervised, Semi-Supervised Classification with MIXture MODelling (Interface of MIXMOD Software) R v.2.1.1. (R Foundation, 2016).

  46. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. King, A. A. & Rowan, T. subplex: Unconstrained Optimization using the Subplex Algorithm R v.1.5–2. (R Foundation, 2018).

  49. Etienne, R. S. A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an ‘exact’ test of neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 608–618 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aitchison, J. & Greenacre, M. Biplots of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 51, 375–392 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package R v.2.4–6 (R Foundation, 2018).

  52. Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9, 432–441 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comput. Biol. 9, 687–705 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Matsen, F. A., Kodner, R. B. & Armbrust, E. V. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 538 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Adler and A. Gelb for help with sampling and the provision of images/videos. We also thank T. de Wouters and S. Kuehn for comments on an early draft of the paper. G.E.L. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 162251) and the Human Frontiers Science Program (grant no. LT000643/2016-L). O.X.C. was supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (grant no. 542395).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.H. operated the reactors and sampled granules. T.N.E. and E.S. extracted DNA and prepared the samples for sequencing. G.E.L. and O.X.C. designed the methodology. G.E.L., C.B., U.K., T.N.E. and O.X.C. performed computational analyses. G.E.L., C.H. and O.X.C. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otto X. Cordero.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1–19.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Granule metadata.

Supplementary Data 2

Reference database accession numbers.

Supplementary Video 1

Granular reactor operation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leventhal, G.E., Boix, C., Kuechler, U. et al. Strain-level diversity drives alternative community types in millimetre-scale granular biofilms. Nat Microbiol 3, 1295–1303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0242-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0242-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing