Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

No protofeathers on pterosaurs

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 4, pages 1590–1591 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Matters Arising to this article was published on 28 September 2020

The Original Article was published on 17 December 2018

arising from Z. Yang et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0728-7 (2019)

It is widely held that pterosaurs, Mesozoic flying reptiles, were covered with hair-like monofilament structures (pycnofibres) that formed a fine pelt1,2,3,4. Yang et al.5 propose, on the basis of two specimens of an anurognathid pterosaur from the Late Jurassic epoch of China, that some pycnofibres were branched, exhibiting ‘brush-like’ and ‘tuft-like’ morphologies. Going further, these authors compare the branched pycnofibres to protofeathers, reported for several coelurosaurian dinosaurs6 and argue that they share a common origin, a controversial idea that pushes back the first appearance of feathers some 80 million years, from the Late Jurassic to the Early Triassic5,7,8. Evidence from fossilized integument of other pterosaurs9,10 suggests, however, that the branching reported by Yang et al. may be an artefact of preservation. When bunched up, or partially decomposed and unravelled, structural fibres (aktinofibrils) in the wing membranes of pterosaurs exhibit a variety of seemingly branched morphologies including brush-like and tuft-like structures2,9,10. Consequently, branching is not a reliable guide to the identity and homology of pterosaur integumentary structures. In support of their argument for protofeathers in pterosaurs, Yang et al.5 cite the presence of melanosomes and keratin. Both are widely distributed in the pterosaur integument, however, and neither is unique to pycnofibres5,11,12. The rarity of purportedly branched pycnofibres, their restriction to a single, relatively derived pterosaur clade and the absence of uniquely shared morphologies do not support the idea of homology with feathers, as Campione et al.13 have shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Integumentary structures in Sordes pilosus, PIN–2585/36 (Palaeontological Institute, Moscow).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study were collected from the literature cited and examination of specimens mentioned in the text.

References

  1. Wellnhofer, P. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Pterosaurs (Salamander Books, 1991).

  2. Unwin, D. M. The Pterosaurs from Deep Time (Pi, 2005).

  3. Kellner, A. W. A. et al. The soft tissue of Jeholopterus (Pterosauria, Anurognathidae, Batrachognathinae) and the structure of the pterosaur wing membrane. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 321–329 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Witton, M. P. Pterosaurs. Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).

  5. Yang, Z. et al. Pterosaur integumentary structures with complex feather-like branching. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 24–30 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, X. et al. An integrative approach to understanding bird origins. Science 346, 1253293 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benton, M. J., Dhouially, D., Jiang, B. & McNamara, M. The early origin of feathers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 856–859 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, X. Feather evolution: Looking up close and through deep time. Sci. Bull. 64, 563–564 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Unwin, D. M. & Bakhurina, N. N. Sordes pilosus and the nature of the pterosaur flight apparatus. Nature 371, 62–64 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frey, E., Tischlinger, H., Buchy, M. C. & Martill, D. M. in Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs Vol. 217 (eds Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M.) 233–266 (Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 2003).

  11. Li, Q. et al. Melanosome evolution indicates a key physiological shift within feathered dinosaurs. Nature 507, 350–353 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinheiro, F. L. et al. Chemical characterization of pterosaur melanin challenges color inferences in extinct animals. Sci. Rep. 9, 15947 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campione, N. E., Barrett, P. M. & Evans, D. C. in The Evolution of Feathers (eds Foth, C. & Rauhut, O. W. M.) 213–243 (Springer, 2020).

  14. Czerkas, S. A. & Ji, Q. in Feathered Dinosaurs and the Origin of Flight (ed. Czerkas, S. J.) 15–41 (The Dinosaur Museum, 2002).

  15. Ji, Q. & Yuan, C. Discovery of two kinds of protofeathered pterosaurs in the Mesozoic Daohugou biota in the Ningcheng region and its stratigraphic and biologic significances. Geol. Rev. 48, 221–224 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X. L., Zhou, Z. H., Zhang, F. C. & Xu, X. A nearly completely articulated rhamphorhynchoid pterosaur with exceptionally well-preserved wing membranes and ‘hairs’ from Inner Mongolia, northeast China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 47, 226–230 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jäger, K. R. K., Tischlinger, H., Oleschinski, G. & Sander, P. M. Goldfuß was right: soft part preservation in the Late Jurassic pterosaur Scaphognathus crassirostris revealed by reflectance transformation imaging and ultraviolet light and the auspicious beginnings of paleo-art. Palaeontol. Electron. 21.3.3T (2019).

  18. Lü, J. & Hone, D. W. E. A new Chinese anurognathid pterosaur and the evolution of pterosaurian tail lengths. Acta Geol. Sin. 86, 1317–1325 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett, S. C. New interpretation of the wings of the pterosaur Rhamphorhynchus muensteri based on the Zittel and Marsh specimens. J. Paleontol. 89, 845–869 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hone, D., Henderson, D. M., Therrien, F. & Habib, M. B. A specimen of Rhamphorhynchus with soft tissue preservation, stomach contents and a putative coprolite. PeerJ 3, e1191 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan, Y. et al. Molecular evidence of keratin and melanosomes in feathers of the Early Cretaceous bird Eoconfuciusornis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7900–E7907 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alibardi, L. Adaptation to the land: the skin of reptiles in comparison to that of amphibians and endotherm amniotes. J. Exp. Zool. 298B, 12–41 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Wellnhofer and O. Rauhut (Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München), Z. Zhou, X. Wang and S. Jiang (Institute for Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology, Beijing), staff of the Jinzhou Palaeontological Museum, Jinzhou, A. Kellner (Museu Nacional, Rio), S. Chapman and L. Steel (Natural History Museum, London), N. Bakhurina-Unwin (Palaeontological Institute, Moscow and University of Bristol), C. Zhou (Paleontological Museum of Liaoning, Shenyang), E. Frey (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Karlsruhe), X. Zheng, W. Wang and X. Zhang (Tianyu Museum of Natural History, Shandong) and X. Jin (Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou) for providing access to specimens in their care, N. Bakhurina-Unwin, C. Bennett, E. Frey, P. Godefroit, M. Habib, D. Hone, S. Jiang, M. McNamara, H. Tischlinger, M. Schweitzer, Z. Yang and the late J. Lü for discussion of the pterosaur integument, and R. Belben and J. Bestwick for suggestions that helped improve an earlier version of the manuscript. D.M.U. thanks the Royal Society (JP100473) and the University of Leicester for financial support. D.M.M. thanks the University of Portsmouth for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Palaeobiology Research, School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    David M. Unwin

  2. School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    David M. Martill

Authors
  1. David M. Unwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Martill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.M.U. and D.M.M. conceived the project, conducted the research, constructed the figures and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Unwin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Unwin, D.M., Martill, D.M. No protofeathers on pterosaurs. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 1590–1591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01308-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene