Cretaceous arachnid Chimerarachne yingi gen. et sp. nov. illuminates spider origins

Published online:


Spiders (Araneae) are a hugely successful lineage with a long history. Details of their origins remain obscure, with little knowledge of their stem group and few insights into the sequence of character acquisition during spider evolution. Here, we describe Chimerarachne yingi gen. et sp. nov., a remarkable arachnid from the mid-Cretaceous (approximately 100 million years ago) Burmese amber of Myanmar, which documents a key transition stage in spider evolution. Like uraraneids, the two fossils available retain a segmented opisthosoma bearing a whip-like telson, but also preserve two traditional synapomorphies for Araneae: a male pedipalp modified for sperm transfer and well-defined spinnerets resembling those of modern mesothele spiders. This unique character combination resolves C. yingi within a clade including both Araneae and Uraraneida; however, its exact position relative to these orders is sensitive to different parameters of our phylogenetic analysis. Our new fossil most likely represents the earliest branch of the Araneae, and implies that there was a lineage of tailed spiders that presumably originated in the Palaeozoic and survived at least into the Cretaceous of Southeast Asia.

  • Subscribe to Nature Ecology & Evolution for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims inpublished maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Selden, P. A. Fossil mesothele spiders. Nature 379, 498–499 (1996).

  2. 2.

    Selden, P. A., Shcherbakov, D. E., Dunlop, J. A. & Eskov, K. Y. Arachnids from the Carboniferous of Russia and Ukraine, and the Permian of Kazakhstan. Paläont. Z. 88, 297–307 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Shear, W. A., Palmer, J. M., Coddington, J. A. & Bonamo, P. M. A Devonian spinneret: early evidence of spiders and silk use. Science 246, 479–481 (1989).

  4. 4.

    Selden, P. A., Shear, W. A. & Bonamo, P. M. A spider and other arachnids from the Devonian of New York, and reinterpretations of Devonian Araneae. Palaeontology 34, 241–281 (1991).

  5. 5.

    Selden, P. A., Shear, W. A. & Sutton, M. D. Fossil evidence for the origin of spider spinnerets, and a proposed arachnid order. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20781–20785 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Platnick, N. I. & Gertsch, W. J. The suborders of spiders: a cladistics analysis. Am. Mus. Novit. 2607, 1–15 (1976).

  7. 7.

    Haupt, J. The Mesothelae—a monograph of an exceptional group of spiders (Araneae: Mesothelae). Zoologica 154, 1–102 (2003).

  8. 8.

    Shultz, J. W. A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 150, 221–265 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Savory, T. On the arachnid order Palpigradi. J. Arachnol. 2, 43–45 (1974).

  10. 10.

    Legg, D. A., Sutton, M. D. & Edgecombe, G. D. Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Nat. Commun. 4, 2485 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Garwood, R. J. & Dunlop, J. A. Three-dimensional reconstruction and the phylogeny of extinct chelicerate orders. PeerJ 2, e641 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Garwood, R. J. et al. Almost a spider: a 305-million-year-old fossil arachnid and spider origins. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160125 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Lamarck, J. B. Système des Animaux sans Vertebres (Deterville, Paris, 1801).

  14. 14.

    Wunderlich, J. New and rare fossil spiders (Araneae) in mid Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma), including the description of new extinct families of the suborders Mesothelae and Opisthothelae as well as notes on the taxonomy, the evolution and the biogeography of the Mesothelae. Beitr. Araneol. 10, 72–279 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Selden, P. A. & Ren, D. A review of Burmese amber arachnids. J. Arachnol. 45, 324–343 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Miether, S. T. & Dunlop, J. A. Lateral eye evolution in the arachnids. Arachnology 17, 103–119 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Wheeler, W. C. et al. The spider tree of life: phylogeny of Araneae based on target-gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling. Cladistics 33, 574–616 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Raven, R. J. The spider infraorder Mygalomorphae (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 182, 1–180 (1985).

  19. 19.

    Kraus, O. Liphistius and the evolution of spider genitalia. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 42, 235–254 (1978).

  20. 20.

    Shultz, J. W. The origin of the spinning apparatus in spiders. Biol. Rev. 62, 89–113 (1987).

  21. 21.

    Marples, B. J. The spinnerets and epiandrous glands of spiders. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. 46, 209–222 (1967).

  22. 22.

    Sharma, P. P. Chelicerates and the conquest of land: a view of arachnid origins through an evo-devo spyglass. Int. Comp. Biol. 57, 510–522 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Dunlop, J. A. & Lamsdell, J. C. Segmentation and tagmosis in Chelicerata. Arth. Struct. Dev. 46, 395–418 (2017).

  24. 24.

    O’Reilly, J. E. et al. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160081 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Shi, G. H. et al. Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U–Pb dating of zircons. Cretac. Res. 37, 155–163 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Ross, A., Mellish, C., York, P. & Crighton, B. in Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits (ed. Penney, D.) 208–235 (Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, 2010).

  27. 27.

    Wang, B. et al. Debris-carrying camouflage among diverse lineages of Cretaceous insects. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501918 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Garwood, R. J., Dunlop, J. A., Knecht, B. J. & Hegna, T. A. The phylogeny of fossil whip spiders. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 105 (2017).

Download references


We are grateful to M. Engel and J. Wunderlich for helpful initial comments, Y. Huang and Y. Ying for providing specimens, Z. Yin and S. Wu for the micro-computed tomography reconstruction, J. Keating for advice on Bayesian inference of phylogeny and D. Yang for the reconstruction. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572010, 41622201 and 41688103), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB05) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (number 2011224).

Author information


  1. State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China

    • Bo Wang
    •  & Xiaojie Lei
  2. Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China

    • Bo Wang
  3. Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    • Jason A. Dunlop
  4. Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    • Paul A. Selden
  5. Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London, UK

    • Paul A. Selden
    •  & Russell J. Garwood
  6. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    • Russell J. Garwood
  7. Department of Biology, Hampden–Sydney College, Hampden–Sydney, VA, USA

    • William A. Shear
  8. Friedhofstraße 9, Käshofen, Germany

    • Patrick Müller
  9. University of Sciences and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Xiaojie Lei


  1. Search for Bo Wang in:

  2. Search for Jason A. Dunlop in:

  3. Search for Paul A. Selden in:

  4. Search for Russell J. Garwood in:

  5. Search for William A. Shear in:

  6. Search for Patrick Müller in:

  7. Search for Xiaojie Lei in:


B.W. designed the project. B.W., J.A.D., P.A.S., R.J.G. and W.A.S. all contributed to observation and interpretation of the fossils and drafted the manuscript. B.W. and X.L. produced the photographs. P.A.S. produced the line drawings, measurements and description. R.J.G. ran the phylogenetic analysis. P.M. collected data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Wang.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary figures, phylogenetic reconstruction and character list

  2. Life Sciences Reporting Summary

  3. Supplementary Data

    Executable data matrices

  4. Supplementary Video

    3D reconstruction of specimen NIGP166871