In 2018 technologies on the International Space Station will provide ∼1 year of synchronous observations of ecosystem composition, structure and function. We discuss these instruments and how they can be used to constrain global models and improve our understanding of the current state of terrestrial ecosystems. Author Correction (05 September 2017)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF): Towards a Better Understanding of Vegetation Dynamics and Carbon Uptake in Arctic-Boreal Ecosystems
Current Climate Change Reports Open Access 04 April 2024
-
Role of space station instruments for improving tropical carbon flux estimates using atmospheric data
npj Microgravity Open Access 20 November 2022
-
GriddingMachine, a database and software for Earth system modeling at global and regional scales
Scientific Data Open Access 01 June 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
05 September 2017
In the version of this Comment previously published, in Box 1, the spacing of the GEDI footprints should have read 60 m along the track, not 25 m. Also the second affiliation for Susan Ustin was incorrect, she is only associated with the University of California, Davis. These errors have now been corrected.
References
Matsunaga, T. et al. in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. http://doi.org/b7d7 (IEEE, 2016).
Iwasaki, A. et al. in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. http://doi.org/cpxfdf (IEEE, 2011).
Guanter, L. et al. Remote Sens. 7, 8830–8857 (2015).
Asner, G. P. et al. Remote Sens. Environ. 158, 15–27 (2015).
Singh, A. et al. Ecol. Appl. 25, 2180–2197 (2015).
Jetz, W. et al. Nat. Plants 2, 16024 (2016).
Moorcroft, P. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 3857–3974 (2006).
Fisher, J. B. et al. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 91–123 (2014).
Dietze, M. C. & Latimer, A. M. in Encyclopedia of Theorestical Ecology 307–316 (2012).
Dietze, M. C. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1575–1585 (2013).
Keenan, T. F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2555–2569 (2012).
Luo, Y. et al. Biogeosciences 9, 3857–3874 (2012).
Acknowledgements
Many of these ideas were born and developed at the workshop on Exploring New Multi-Instrument Approaches to Observing Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Carbon Cycle from Space that occurred 5–9 October 2015 and was funded by the Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS), organized by Michelle Judd, and hosted at the institute facility at California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California. Additionally, the ideas in this article would not have been possible without the contributions of each participant. The majority of the work was internally funded and carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Also, S.S. was supported during the writing of this manuscript by the Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE) in the Tropics, which is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy, Office of Science, and through the United States Department of Energy (grant no. DE-SC0012704) to Brookhaven National Laboratory. R.D. is funded by NASA Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation Mission (grant no. NNL15AA03C). P.W. acknowledges support from the NASA Carbon Cycle Science programme (grant no. NNX14AI60G). J.F. is funded by the NASA ECOSTRESS project. A.S. was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through the Dimensions of Biodiversity programme (DEB-1342872).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.N.S. is the lead writer for the manuscript, D.S. led discussions and helped articulate the key points of discussion for the manuscript, R.P. provided HISUI and OCO-3 information and panels in Fig. 2 as well as with edits for the manuscript, S.S. helped edit the general text, developed Fig. 2 and provided text for terrestrial biosphere models section, A.S. helped edit the general text and provided text for terrestrial biosphere models sections, L.D. provided the GEDI panel in Fig. 2 and text describing GEDI, J.B.F. helped with general editing and provided the ECOSTRESS panel in Fig. 2, F.F. helped with general editing, S.U. helped develop the original manuscript outline, R.D., A.S. and P.W. were key in contributing ideas for the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stavros, E., Schimel, D., Pavlick, R. et al. ISS observations offer insights into plant function. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 0194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0194
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0194
This article is cited by
-
Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF): Towards a Better Understanding of Vegetation Dynamics and Carbon Uptake in Arctic-Boreal Ecosystems
Current Climate Change Reports (2024)
-
Plant beta-diversity across biomes captured by imaging spectroscopy
Nature Communications (2022)
-
GriddingMachine, a database and software for Earth system modeling at global and regional scales
Scientific Data (2022)
-
Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to advance biodiversity conservation
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2022)
-
Role of space station instruments for improving tropical carbon flux estimates using atmospheric data
npj Microgravity (2022)