Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Competition along trajectories governs adaptation rates towards antimicrobial resistance

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 January 2017

Abstract

The increasing availability of genotype–phenotype maps for different combinations of mutations has empowered evolutionary biologists with the tools to interrogate the predictability of adaptive evolution, especially in the context of the evolution of antimicrobial resistance. Large microbial populations are known to generate competing beneficial mutations, but determining how these mutations contribute to the adaptive trajectories that are most likely to be followed remains a challenge. Despite a recognition that there may also be competition between successive alleles on the same trajectory, prior studies have not fully considered how this impacts adaptation rates along, or likelihood of following, individual trajectories. Here, we develop a metric that quantifies the competition between successive alleles along adaptive trajectories and show how this competition largely governs the rate of evolution in simulations on empirical fitness landscapes for proteins involved in drug resistance in two species of malaria (Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax). Our findings reveal that a trajectory with a larger-than-average initial fitness increase may have smaller fitness increases in later steps, which slows adaptation. In some circumstances, these trajectories may be outcompeted by alleles on faster alternative trajectories that are being explored simultaneously. The ability to predict adaptation rates along accessible trajectories has implications for efforts to manage antimicrobial resistance in real-world settings and for the broader intellectual pursuit of predictive evolution in complex adaptive fitness landscapes for a variety of application domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Types of clonal interference.
Figure 2: Speed of acquisition of drug resistance varies non-monotonically with dosage.
Figure 3: Quantifying within-path competition.
Figure 4: Illustrative example of the influence of clonal interference on trajectories taken and adaptation rates.
Figure 5: Clonal interference within winning trajectories largely governs adaptation rates.
Figure 6: Blocking the greedy path can speed up the evolution of resistance.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright, S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. In Proc. 4th Int. Congress Genetics (ed. Jones, D. F.) Vol. 1, 356–366 (The Genetics Society of America, 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kauffman, S., Lobo, J. & Macready, W. G. Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 43, 141–166 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: an Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial intelligence (Univ. Michigan Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marion, R. The Edge of Organization: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems (Sage Publications, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weinreich, D. M., Delaney, N. F., DePristo, M. A. & Hartl, D. L. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312, 111–114 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lozovsky, E. R. et al. Stepwise acquisition of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12025–12030 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Visser, J. A. G. & Krug, J. Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 480–490 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poelwijk, F. J., Kiviet, D. J., Weinreich, D. M. & Tans, S. J. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445, 383–386 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer, A. C. & Kishony, R. Understanding, predicting and manipulating the genotypic evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 243–248 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carneiro, M. & Hartl, D. L. Adaptive landscapes and protein evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1747–1751 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinreich, D. M., Lan, Y., Wylie, C. S. & Heckendorn, R. B. Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3, 700–707 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, L., Serene, S., Chao, H. X. & Gore, J. Hidden randomness between fitness landscapes limits reverse evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 198102 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, P.-P., Corbett-Detig, R. B., Hartl, D. L. & Lozovsky, E. R. Accessible mutational trajectories for the evolution of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite plasmodium vivax. J. Mol. Evol. 77, 81–91 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogbunugafor, C. B., Wylie, C. S., Diakite, I., Weinreich, D. M. & Hartl, D. L. Adaptive landscape by environment interactions dictate evolutionary dynamics in models of drug resistance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004710 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toprak, E. et al. Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection. Nat. Genet. 44, 101–105 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmer, A. C. et al. Delayed commitment to evolutionary fate in antibiotic resistance fitness landscapes. Nat. Commun. 6, 7385 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Visser, M. et al. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 283, 404–406 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miralles, R., Gerrish, P. J., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science 285, 1745–1747 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paget-McNicol, S. & Saul, A. Mutation rates in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of plasmodium falciparum. Parasitology 122, 497–505 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dondorp, A. M. et al. Estimation of the total parasite biomass in acute falciparum malaria from plasma pfhrp2. PLoS Med. 2, e204 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerrish, P. J. & Lenski, R. E. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102, 127–144 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Desai, M. M., Fisher, D. S. & Murray, A. W. The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Curr. Biol. 17, 385–394 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jain, K., Krug, J. & Park, S.-C. Evolutionary advantage of small populations on complex fitness landscapes. Evolution 65, 1945–1955 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ochs, I. E. & Desai, M. M. The competition between simple and complex evolutionary trajectories in asexual populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rozen, D. E., Habets, M. G., Handel, A. & de Visser, J. A. G. Heterogeneous adaptive trajectories of small populations on complex fitness landscapes. PLoS ONE 3, e1715 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kryazhimskiy, S., Rice, D. P. & Desai, M. M. Population subdivision and adaptation in asexual populations of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolution 66, 1931–1941 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nahum, J. R. et al. A tortoise–hare pattern seen in adapting structured and unstructured populations suggests a rugged fitness landscape in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7530–7535 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nwakanma, D. C. et al. Changes in malaria parasite drug resistance in an endemic population over a 25-year period with resulting genomic evidence of selection. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 1126–1135 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogbunugafor, C. B. & Hartl, D. A pivot mutation impedes reverse evolution across an adaptive landscape for drug resistance in Plasmodium vivax . Malaria J. 15, 1 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eppstein, M. J. & Ogbunugafor, C. B. Quantifying deception: A case study in the evolution of antimicrobial resistance. In Proc. 2016 Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf. 101–108 (ACM, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brown, K. M. et al. Compensatory mutations restore fitness during the evolution of dihydrofolate reductase. Molec. Biol. Evol. 27, 2682–2690 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Costanzo, M. S., Brown, K. M. & Hartl, D. L. Fitness trade-offs in the evolution of dihydrofolate reductase and drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum . PLoS ONE 6, e19636 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright, S. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159 (1931).

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor, P. D. & Jonker, L. B. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 40, 145–156 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Bagrow, C. Goodnight, S. Scarpino, D. Weinrich and J. Weitz for helpful discussions, and S. Heinrich and J. Payne for valuable comments on the manuscript. C.B.O. was supported by the Ford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship and the George Washington Henderson Fellowship Program at the University of Vermont.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.B.O. and M.J.E. conceived the experiments, M.J.E. wrote the code, performed and analysed the experiments, and created the figures and tables. C.B.O. and M.J.E. interpreted the results and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret J. Eppstein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables 1–6, Supplementary Figures 1–8 and Supplementary References. (PDF 446 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogbunugafor, C., Eppstein, M. Competition along trajectories governs adaptation rates towards antimicrobial resistance. Nat Ecol Evol 1, 0007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0007

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing