Scientific progress often relies on applying published methodological advances to different problems. With the aim of improving both the uptake and reproducibility of chemical transformations, a new assessment tool has now been developed that provides a clear and easy-to-interpret overview of common factors that affect a synthetic method.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).
Collins, K. D. & Glorius, F. Nat. Chem. 5, 597–601 (2013).
Gensch, T., Teders, M. & Glorius, F. J. Org. Chem. 82, 9154–915 (2017).
Pitzer, L., Schäfers, F. & Glorius, F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8572–8576 (2019).
The brilliant history of photoredox catalysis. Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/d42473-019-00033-7 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douglas, J.J. A display of sensitivity. Nat. Chem. 11, 683–684 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0302-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0302-1
