Abstract
The nitrogen vacancy centre in diamond is a leading platform for nanoscale sensing and imaging, as well as quantum information processing in the solid state. To date, individual control of two nitrogen vacancy electronic spins at the nanoscale has been demonstrated. However, a key challenge is to scale up such control to arrays of nitrogen vacancy spins. Here, we apply nanoscale magnetic resonance frequency encoding to realize site-selective addressing and coherent control of a four-site array of nitrogen vacancy spins. Sites in the array are separated by 100 nm, with each site containing multiple nitrogen vacancies separated by ~15 nm. Microcoils fabricated on the diamond chip provide electrically tuneable magnetic field gradients ~0.1 G/nm. Tailored application of gradient fields and resonant microwaves allow site-selective nitrogen vacancy spin manipulation and sensing applications, including Rabi oscillations, imaging, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with nanoscale resolution. Microcoil-based magnetic resonance of solid-state spins provides a practical platform for quantum-assisted sensing, quantum information processing, and the study of nanoscale spin networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In recent years, nitrogen vacancy (NV) colour centres in diamond have been successfully applied to a wide range of problems in quantum information, sensing, and metrology in both the physical and life sciences.1 For example, single NV centres have been used for a loophole-free Bell test of quantum realism,2 probing nanoscale phenomena in condensed matter systems,3,4,5,6,7 and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging of nanoscale ensembles of nuclear spins8,9,10 including single proteins11 and individual proton spins.12 Large ensembles of NV centres have provided magnetic imaging with combined micron-scale resolution and millimetre field-of-view, e.g., for mapping paleomagnetism in primitive meteorites13 and ancient Earth rocks,14 genetic studies of magnetotactic bacteria,15, 16 and identifying biomarkers in tumour cells.17 However, it remains a challenge to realize the intermediate regime of mesoscopic arrays of NV spins with selective nanoscale addressing and coherent control of NVs at each site in the array. Such a capability could be a platform technology for applications such as high-spatial-dynamic-range magnetic imaging18,19,20 and quantum-assisted sensing,21,22,23 as well as scalable quantum information processing24, 25 and simulation.26, 27
In the present work, we experimentally demonstrate selective coherent manipulation of an array of four NV spin sites, equally spaced by ~100 nm, using a frequency encoding technique inspired by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In frequency encoding, the positions of spins at different locations in a sample are mapped onto their resonance frequency using tuneable magnetic field gradients, and then frequency-tailored pulse sequences address and control spins at specific target positions. This technique is widely employed in conventional biomedical MRI for image slice-selection with millimetre-scale resolution,28 and was recently used in trapped-ion experiments29 to control coherently ions separated by a few microns. Frequency encoding has also been demonstrated for individual NV spins using magnetic tips.18, 30 Creating strong and spatially homogeneous magnetic field gradients that can be switched rapidly compared to the spin coherence lifetime is the primary technical challenge for multi-site spin control. For our NV-diamond experiment, we achieve a tuneable gradient strength ~0.1 G/nm over a 1.2 × 8 μm2 area by use of a micrometre-scale electromagnetic coil (microcoil) fabricated onto the diamond by e-beam lithography (Fig. 1). This gradient strength is several orders of magnitude larger than in conventional MRI; see our prior work20 for comparison details. The microcoil field gradient is spatially uniform to 5%, can be modulated at ~1 MHz, and its application requires no active cooling of the sample. Note that gradients of comparable magnitudes over a large area and with comparable switching rates are difficult to achieve using ferromagnets.31 In Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2, we provide a detailed comparison between these two techniques with respect to figures of merit such as spatial dynamic range and gradient switching bandwidth. We apply these electrically tuneable magnetic field gradients to a series of demonstrations on the array of NV spins, including site-selective electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, Rabi oscillations, Fourier imaging,20 and NMR spectroscopy, all with spatial resolution ≈30 nm.
Results
Frequency encoding of NV spin sites in diamond
The frequency-encoding system for site-selective addressing of NV spins in diamond consists of fabricated arrays of NV centres and micron-scale coils, integrated into a home-built scanning confocal microscope as illustrated in Fig. 1a. NV centres are located at a depth of ≈20 nm from the surface of a [100]-cut diamond chip (4 × 4 × 0.5 mm3) and are arranged in a two-dimensional (2D) array (Supplementary Fig. 3). A uniform, static magnetic field of B 0 = 128 G, created by an external Helmholtz coil pair, is applied along the diamond [111] direction, which corresponds to one of the four NV crystallographic orientations (Fig. 1a, inset). A microwave antenna for coherent spin-state control and a magnetic field gradient microcoil are fabricated directly on the diamond surface. A strong field gradient, aligned nominally with B 0, is created by sending electric currents through the microcoil in an anti-Helmholtz configuration. In each optically addressable confocal volume, four NV sites spaced by 100 nm are created by mask implantation (Fig. 1b).32 Figure 1c shows the energy-level diagram of the negatively charged NV centre. The ground-state spin triplet is optically initialized into spin state |0〉, coherently addressed with microwaves, and read out by spin-state-dependent fluorescence. On applying a magnetic field gradient, the NV spins in different sites acquire a position-dependent Zeeman splitting between the |±1〉 states with well-resolved resonance frequencies. NV spins in each site can thus be selectively manipulated by microwaves with distinct, site-specific frequencies.
As shown by scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Fig. 1d, the spacing between the gradient microcoil wires is 2.5 μm. In each NV site, there are approximately three NV centres with the same crystallographic orientation, as determined by the rate of fluorescence counts in a typical confocal volume (Fig. 1e), which is consistent with the estimated NV concentration of 5 × 1011 cm−2. See Methods and Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5 for more details of the mask implantation and microcoil fabrication. Super-resolution optical imaging with a stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscope confirms the formation of four NV sites with a spacing of about 100 nm within a confocal volume (Fig. 1e, inset). More details of the STED imaging apparatus is found in the “Methods” section.
Demonstration of site-selective NV spin addressing and control
As a benchmark demonstration of site-selective NV addressing via frequency encoding, we performed optically detected ESR measurements with a DC electric current of 250 mA sent through the microcoil (Fig. 2a). Four ESR peaks, corresponding to the four NV sites in the array, are clearly observed (Fig. 2b). We fit the data to a sum of four Lorentzian curves, and determined the splitting between adjacent resonances to be ∆f = 29(3) MHz. From the SEM and STED images we find the mean separation between NV sites to be Δx = 96(7) nm, and thus the field gradient to be dB/dx = 2π × Δf/γΔx = 0.11(1) G nm−1. Note that the observed ~30% variation in ESR peak linewidth is consistent with a simple model of inhomogeneous line broadening in the presence of the applied magnetic field gradient due to multiple (typically three) NV centres being randomly distributed in position within each site. See also Supplementary Fig. 6 for detailed analysis.
Next, we demonstrated site-selective coherent Rabi driving of NV spins via the pulse sequence illustrated in Fig. 2c. After initializing all NV spins into the |0〉 state with a 5 µs long green laser pulse, frequency encoding is instantiated with a DC field gradient, and a microwave pulse tuned to the ESR frequency of a target NV site is applied for a duration τ MW. Finally, another 5 µs laser pulse is applied to read out the NV spin states via a fluorescence measurement. NVs in the target site exhibit Rabi oscillations as the duration of the microwave pulse is varied. As the microwave frequency is adjusted to match the ESR frequency at each of the four sites, we obtain the data shown in Fig. 2d. The fidelity of such site-selective control of the NV spins via frequency encoding is estimated to be >97.4% (see “Methods”). By fitting each Rabi oscillation data set with a sinusoid, we determine the Rabi frequencies at all four NV sites, with results that are consistent with a numerical simulation of the microwave field produced by the antenna (Fig. 2e, see also Supplementary Discussion 1).
Demonstration of site-selective NV imaging and NMR spectroscopy
To illustrate the utility of the frequency encoding technique, we performed site-selective one-dimensional (1D) imaging of the array of NV centres. The experimental protocol (Fig. 3a) augments our previously demonstrated NV Fourier imaging technique20 with frequency encoding to resolve the array’s sub-diffraction-limit spatial structure with site-selection capability. In analogy with conventional MRI, an alternating (AC) magnetic field gradient, synchronized with a Hahn echo NV pulse sequence, phase-encodes spatial information about the NV sites in wavenumber or “k-space” onto the NV spins’ phase, while also isolating the NV spins from local magnetic field variations that induce dephasing. In particular, the array of NV spins with real-space positions x i (i = A,…, D) is exposed to an AC gradient of magnitude \({\left( {dB/dx} \right)_j}\) and thus acquires a position-dependent phase \(\varphi = 2\pi {k_j}{x_i}\), where \({k_j} = {\left( {2\pi } \right)^{ - 1}}\gamma \tau {\left( {dB/dx} \right)_j}\) defines the jth point in Fourier or k-space. Here, γ/2π = 2.8 MHz/G is the NV gyromagnetic ratio and τ is the total NV spin precession time in the Hahn echo sequence. The optically detected NV signal for a point in k-space is proportional to the sum across all NV sites of the cosine of the acquired NV spin phase at each site: \({\it{s}}\left( {{k_j}} \right)\sim \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_i {\cos (2\pi {k_j}{x_i})}\). By incrementally stepping through a range of field gradient amplitudes with τ fixed, one measures the NV signal as a function of k to yield a k-space image. In the following discussion we drop subscript j for simplicity. The real-space image is then reconstructed by a Fourier transformation of the k-space image: \(S\left( x \right) = F[{\it{s}}\left( k \right)]\), where \(abs[S\left( x \right)]\) gives the relative positions of the NV sites in the array. Note that the resolution of the real-space image is \({\left( {{k_{max}}} \right)^{ - 1}}\), where \({k_{max}} = {\left( {2\pi } \right)^{ - 1}}\gamma \tau {\left| {dB/dx} \right|_{max}}\) is the maximum k value used in the measurement. In the presence of an additional DC frequency-encoding field gradient and frequency-tuned microwave pulses, only NV centres at a specific target site in the array (e.g., x A) are subject to the phase-encoding protocol and hence contribute to both the Fourier image (e.g., \({\it{s}}\left( {{k_j},{x_A}} \right)\sim \cos (2\pi {k_j}{x_A})\)) and the real-space image (e.g., \(S\left( {{x_A}} \right)\)).
We demonstrated this nanoscale NV imaging protocol using a phase-encoding magnetic field gradient of sinusoidal form \({\left( {dB/dx} \right)_j} = {G_j}\sin (2\pi t/\tau )\), where G j is the gradient magnitude for the jth point in k-space. Example 1D k-space and real-space NV images are shown in Fig. 3b, c, respectively, for 512 equally spaced k-space points and the NV spin-free precession time fixed at τ = 0.9 µs. The maximum k-space value is k max = 0.021(1) nm−1, which is induced by an AC gradient magnitude of \({G_{max}}\) = 0.0068(3) G nm−1 corresponding to a microcoil current of I = 25 mA. k max implies a 1D real-space resolution of δx = (2k max)−1 = 24(2) nm, which is much less than the 100 nm separation between sites in the array of NV spins, but is insufficient to resolve individual NVs within one site. Note that site-selective Hahn echo measurements using the DC field gradient, but without phase encoding, confirm that the coherence times (T 2) for NV centres in all array sites are ≥2 μs and thus decoherence is insignificant during the imaging protocol (see Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Fig. 7).
The top images in both Fig. 3b, c (labelled ABCD) have no DC frequency-encoding gradient applied, and hence contain contributions from all four NV sites, whereas the bottom four images in these figures (labelled A, B, C, or D) are acquired with site-selective frequency encoding using a DC magnetic field gradient of 0.1 G nm−1. The four resolved signal peaks in image ABCD in Fig. 3c indicate the real-space locations of the NV sites in the array, with mean site separation = 93(1) nm and mean site diameter = 32(2) nm. These results are consistent with the NV array geometry determined using site-selective frequency encoding (images A, B, C, and D in Fig. 3c), which collectively yield mean site separation = 92(1) nm and mean site diameter = 33(2) nm. Consistent results are also found for the k-space images with and without site-selective frequency encoding. Specifically, site-selected k-space images A, B, C, and D in Fig. 3b exhibit coherent single-spatial-frequency oscillations, with the frequency at each site (determined from fits to the image data) varying linearly with location in the array, as expected for a uniform DC gradient field (Supplementary Fig. 8). k-space image ABCD, acquired without site-selection, displays spatial frequency beats in accord with a coherent sum of the k-space images A, B, C, D from the four NV sites.
As a final demonstration, we combined the frequency encoding technique with an AC magnetometry experimental protocol (Fig. 4a) to perform site-selective NMR spectroscopy of the 15N nuclear spins that are constituents of the NV centres at each site. With no applied DC field gradient, all four NV sites contribute to the measured Hahn echo signal, allowing determination of the NV ensemble T 2 ≥ 2 μs (Fig. 4b, upper panel and Supplementary Fig. 7). With the frequency encoding DC gradient applied and the microwave frequency tuned to address only one NV site at a time, the Hahn echo signal is modulated by the 15N NMR signal at a Larmor precession frequency given by the transverse component of the gradient field \({{\it{B}}_ \bot }\) at the selected site (Fig. 4b, lower panel and Supplementary Discussion 2). The measured 15N Larmor frequency as a function of the varying transverse field \({{\it{B}}_ \bot }\) across multiple sites yields a 15N nuclear gyromagnetic ratio of |γ n/2π| = 0.46(4) kHz G−1, which is consistent with the accepted value.19
Discussion
Microcoil-based magnetic resonance frequency encoding provides a practical method for site-selective addressing and coherent control of a mesoscale array of solid-state spins with nanoscale resolution. In particular, the microcoil technique has advantages relative to the use of a scanned magnetic tip in terms of spatial dynamic range and gradient switching bandwidth. When combined with Fourier magnetic imaging,20 frequency encoding enables site-selective addressability in both the space and time domains, with advantages over other high-spatial-resolution NV magnetic imaging/sensing methods; see our prior work20 for a comparative discussion. Microcoil-based frequency encoding should be extendable to multiple spatial dimensions, larger and denser NV arrays, and smaller length scales (Supplementary Discussion 3), enabling applications such as targeted decoupling of proximal, dipolar-coupled NV spins. Key technical challenges include further increases in gradient strength (without significant additional heating), as well as improved SNR in the presence of applied gradients (e.g., by optimization of NV density and coherence time, enhanced NV fluorescence collection efficiency, and use of alternative NV spin-state readout schemes20). For example, an increase in gradient strength to >1 G nm−1 should be practical by increasing the electric current through the microcoil, optimally matching the microcoil’s impedance to the current supply, and introducing an active temperature control system to better remove microcoil-induced heat from the diamond (Supplementary Discussion 4). This enhanced gradient field could allow selective addressing with >95% fidelity of a micron-scale array of dipolar-coupled NV centres, each spaced by ≈10 nm (Supplementary Discussions 4 and 5). Such a network of strongly interacting spins with high-spatial-dynamic range has many potential applications, including in quantum sensing and imaging,33 quantum information processing,34, 35 studies of quantum spin transport,36 and as quantum simulators for exotic quantum and topological phases (e.g., spin liquids and supersolids,37 quantum spin Hall effect,38 and topological insulators39). We also emphasize the simplicity and flexibility of the gradient microcoil design, which facilitates integration with other systems such as microfluidics and micro-electro-mechanical systems. Furthermore, the frequency-encoding technique should be integratable with a wide range of NV sensing protocols, including for DC and AC magnetic fields, electric fields, and temperature. These advantages open new directions for applications, including wide-field NMR imaging of nanoscale nuclear spin diffusion and effusion in cellular or microfluidic environments via q-space detection,40 and spatially selective nanoscale imaging of strongly correlated spins in condensed matter systems.37
Methods
Creation of 2D NV centre arrays with mask implantation
The diamond sample used in this experiment is an electronic-grade, single-crystal, and 99.999% 12C high-purity chemical vapour deposition [100]-cut chip (4 × 4 × 0.5 mm3) obtained from Element 6 Corporation. Registration markers are fabricated on the diamond substrate by e-beam lithography and reactive ion etching. All subsequent fabrication steps use the same spatial coordinates defined by these markers. A polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) ion implantation mask is used to spatially control NV centre formation in a three-level hierarchical structure of 2D NV arrays (Supplementary Fig. 3). 15N+ ions are implanted with a dose of 1 × 1013 cm−2 at an implantation energy of 14 keV. The conversion efficiency from nitrogen ions to NV centres after high temperature vacuum annealing (1200 °C, 4 h) is approximately 6%, which is determined by comparing the measured NV fluorescence signal from a confocal spot with that from a single NV centre. From simulations using the stopping and range of ions in matter programme,41 the NV centres are estimated to be 21(7) nm below the diamond surface. Typical NV spin coherence times are T 2 *≈580 ns and T 2≈4.5 µs, which are expected for the sample’s high implantation dosage of 15N+ ions (1 × 1013 cm−2) and the resulting high density of paramagnetic P1 centres.
Fabrication of gradient microcoil and microwave antenna
The magnetic field gradient microcoil and microwave antenna are fabricated on the diamond chip near the NV arrays (Supplementary Fig. 4). A double-layer PMMA process is employed to form an undercut, which improves the quality of copper lift-off. Here, the bottom layer is PMMA 495k C9 and the top layer is 950k C4. A thin layer of Chromium (~10 nm) is deposited onto the PMMA stack to improve the surface conductance and reduce charging during e-beam lithography. An Elionix F-125 e-beam writing system is used for patterning with exposure dosage and beam energy set at 2600 µC cm−2 and 125 kV, respectively. A 30 nm Ti layer and a 970 nm Au layer are then deposited in an e-beam evaporator, followed by lift-off in MicroChem Remover PG solution. Electrical resistance measurements, performed using a four-probe station, give a resistance of ~2 Ω for each microcoil. A heat sink is then attached to the back surface of the diamond coverslip to enhance heat dissipation (Supplementary Fig. 9).
Confocal scanning laser microscopy
Site-selective NV spin addressing and sensing experiments are performed using a custom-built confocal scanning laser microscope. A 400 mW diode-pumped solid-state laser (Changchun New Industries) operating at 532 nm is used for NV optical excitation. An acousto-optic modulator (Isomet Corporation) modulated at 80 MHz is used for pulsing the laser beam. Laser pulses are sent to a 100×, 1.3 NA oil-immersion objective lens (Nikon CFI Plan Fluor). A three-axis motorized stage (Micos GmbH) allows scanning of the NV-containing diamond sample in the focal plane of the objective. Red fluorescence from NV centres is separated from the 532 nm excitation light with a dichroic beam splitter (Semrock LM01-552-25), focused onto a single-mode fibre with a mode-field-diameter ~5 μm, and then collected by a silicon avalanche photodiode detector (Perkin Elmer SPCM-AQRH-12). Pulse signals from the detector is transmitted to a computer through a DAQ card (National Instrument PCI 6221).
STED microscopy
Super-resolution NV optical images (e.g., Fig. 1e) are recorded on a home-built CW-STED microscope.42 STED microscopy is based on applying a strong, spatially structured optical depletion field to switch off peripheral fluorescent emitters through stimulated emission. In our system, the depletion field is a doughnut-shaped optical beam at 750 nm, which is applied to NV centres in the field of view at the same time as a 532 nm Gaussian-shaped excitation laser beam. The doughnut-shaped depletion beam rapidly drives to the ground electronic state all NV centres that are off the dark spot in the centre of the beam axis, while limiting unwanted NV re-excitation. Thus, only NVs on the beam axis produce NV fluorescence, which is imaged as the microscope is scanned. The doughnut beam is created by a vortex phase plate (RPC Photonics), which imprints a staircase 180° phase shift on the input 750 nm laser beam such that diametrically opposite rays are out of phase. This results in creating a dark spot in the centre of the depletion beam by destructive interference at the focal point of the objective (100× TIRF, Nikon). Aberrations in the interference pattern are minimized via an optimization procedure in which the doughnut beam is imaged by reflection from 80 nm diameter gold nanoparticles, and the position of the vortex phase plate is determined, with respect to the 750 nm laser beam, that minimizes the intensity at the doughnut centre.43 The STED point spread function is then imaged with ~1 µm-deep isolated single NV centres in the bulk diamond sample. An improvement in spatial resolution from about 250 nm (confocal) to 50 nm (STED) is routinely achieved by applying a 300 mW depletion doughnut beam while the excitation beam power is kept as low as 100 µW. With the same experimental parameters, a four site array of NV centres can be STED imaged across a 600 × 250 nm field-of-view with 100 × 100 pixels, at a speed of 10 ms/pixel, realizing a per pixel NV contrast-to-noise ratio of ~5. With such a STED imaging procedure, four individual NV sites, each separated by 96(7) nm are distinguished. 2D Gaussian filtering (4 × 1.5 pixels) and thresholding are applied to improve the image rendering, as in Fig. 1e.
Characterization of the magnetic field gradient
To characterize the performance of the microcoil, the magnetic field gradient is measured as a function of electric current through the microcoil by optically detected NV ESR. An external Helmhotz coil pair is used to apply a uniform magnetic field of B 0 = 128 along the [111] diamond crystallographic orientation (on-axis), which leaves the NV spins along the other three orientations (off-axis) degenerate. A gradient magnetic field B(x) is then introduced by sending an electric current I through the microcoil. This gradient field is aligned nominally with B 0 and the [111] diamond crystallographic orientation, although there is also a modest transverse component to the gradient field \({B_ \bot }({\it{x}})\) (Supplementary Discussion 2). The ground-state Hamiltonian of the on-axis NV centres is thus expressed as \(H/\hbar = DS_{\rm{z}}^2 + \gamma {B_0}{S_z} + \gamma {\boldsymbol{B}} \cdot {\boldsymbol{S}}\), where \(\hbar\) is the reduced Planck constant, γ = 2π × 2.8 MHz G−1 is the NV gyromagnetic ratio, and S is the spin-1 operator. The change of NV fluorescence is recorded under continuous optical and microwave excitations. Supplementary Fig. 10a displays the results of the measurement, showing the change of NV fluorescence as a function of microwave carrier frequency f and current I. Of the four observed resonance bands, the outer two correspond to the ESR transitions of on-axis NV centres, while the inner two are the ESR transitions of three degenerate off-axis NV centres. The measurements are consistent with a simulation based on the above NV spin Hamiltonian (Supplementary Fig. 10b). As the current is increased, the resonance bands become broader because the four NV sites split. A higher resolution ESR scan of the highlighted region in Supplementary Fig. 10a quantifies the splitting of the resonance band for on-axis NV centres (Supplementary Fig. 10c). At around I = 200 mA, the band begins to clearly split into four peaks, corresponding to four proximal NV sites, and the ESR contrast decreases to ~2%. Consistency with simulation is again found (Supplementary Fig. 10d). By fitting the ESR spectrum with a curve comprised of four Lorentzian lineshapes for a given current value, the resonance frequency of each NV site is extracted f i (i = 1,…,4). Since the separation between NV sites is known to be Δx =− 96(7) nm from the SEM and STED images, the field gradient at each current value can be obtained using dB/dx = 2π × Δf/γΔx, where Δf is the measured frequency splitting between adjacent resonance peaks. Repeating this analysis for all current values, the field gradient per unit current is found to be dB/dx/I = 0.45(2) G nm−1 A−1 (Supplementary Fig. 11). In particular, at I = 250 mA, the measured field gradient is dB/dx = 0.11(1) G nm−1. A numerical simulation of the field gradient is performed in three steps. First, the magnetic field spatial distribution produced by the microcoil at a fixed current is simulated using COMSOL. Next, the magnetic field spatial distribution for the entire current range is determined under the assumption that the field is linearly proportional to the current. Finally, the ESR resonance peaks for all NV centres are calculated by diagonalizing the ground-state Hamiltonian with the obtained field distribution as an input. The resulting analysis yields a field gradient per unit current of dB/dx/I = 0.48 G nm−1 A−1, which is in reasonable agreement with the measured value (Supplementary Fig. 11).
Estimation of Rabi driving fidelity
From the site-selective Rabi driving measurements presented in Fig. 2, the fidelity of coherent NV spin driving in the presence of a DC gradient and with a Rabi frequency of Ω can be estimated by evaluating the off-resonant excitation (crosstalk) error: \({p_{{\rm{err}}}} \approx {p_{{\rm{dip}}}} + {p_{{T_1}}} + {p_{{T_2}}} + {p_{{\rm{off}}}}\).44 The first term, \({p_{{\rm{dip}}}}\sim {\left( {\kappa /{{\Omega }}} \right)^2}\sim {10^{ - 9}}\), is the error induced by dipolar coupling (κ = 0.3 kHz) between nearest neighbour NV centres; the second term, \({p_{{T_1}}}\sim {\left( {{{\Omega }}{T_1}} \right)^{ - 1}}\sim {10^{ - 4}}\), is the depolarization error due to the finite NV spin relaxation time (T 1 ~1 ms); and the third term, \({p_{{{\it{T}}_2}}}\sim {\left( {{{\Omega }}{T_2}} \right)^3}\sim {10^{ - 6}}\), is the decoherence error due to the finite decoherence time (T 2 = 100 µs). The dominant contribution comes from the last term, \({{\it{p}}_{{\rm{off}}}} = {\left( {{{{\Omega }}_i}/{{{\Omega }}_R}} \right)^2}{\rm{si}}{{\rm{n}}^2}({{{\Omega }}_R}\tau /2)\), which is the crosstalk error induced by driving adjacent NV sites given finite NV ESR frequency detuning. Here, \({{{\Omega }}_{\it{R}}} = {\left( {{{\Omega }}_i^2 + {\rm{\Delta }}_{i,j}^2} \right)^{1/2}}\) is the generalized Rabi frequency and i = A, …, D is the NV site label, with \({{{\Omega }}_i}\) being the on-resonant Rabi frequency at site i and ∆ i,j being the ESR detuning between site i and j. The maximum crosstalk error (p err) is observed to be 0.026(3) between NV site A and B with the following parameters: ΩA = 4.4(2) MHz, ΩB = 4.2(2) MHz, and ∆AB = 27(1) MHz. In this way, we infer that fidelity of site-selective control is about 97%, which is essentially 1−p err. See also Supplementary Fig. 12.
Data availability
The authors declare that the main data supporting the finding of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files.
References
Childress, L., Walsworth, R. & Lukin, M. Atom-like crystal defects: from quantum computers to biological sensors. Phys. Today 67, 38–43 (2014).
Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
Tetienne, J. P. et al. Nanoscale imaging and control of domain-wall hopping with a nitrogen-vacancy center microscope. Science 344, 1366–1369 (2014).
Kolkowitz, S. et al. Probing Johnson noise and ballistic transport in normal metals with a single-spin qubit. Science 347, 1129–1132 (2015).
van der Sar, T., Casola, F., Walsworth, R. & Yacoby, A. Nanometre-scale probing of spin waves using single-electron spins. Nat. Commun. 6, 7886 (2015).
Pelliccione, M. et al. Scanned probe imaging of nanoscale magnetism at cryogenic temperatures with a single-spin quantum sensor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 700–705 (2016).
Thiel, L. et al. Quantitative nanoscale vortex-imaging using a cryogenic quantum magnetometer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 677–681 (2016).
Mamin, H. J. et al. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a nitrogen-vacancy spin sensor. Science 339, 557–560 (2013).
Staudacher, T. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a (5-nanometer)3 sample volume. Science 339, 561–563 (2013).
DeVience, S. J. et al. Nanoscale NMR spectroscopy and imaging of multiple nuclear species. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 129–134 (2015).
Lovchinsky, I. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quantum logic. Science 351, 836–841 (2016).
Sushkov, A. O. et al. Magnetic resonance detection of individual proton spins using quantum reporters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 197601 (2014).
Fu, R. R. et al. Solar nebula magnetic fields recorded in the Semarkona meteorite. Science 346, 1089–1092 (2014).
Fu, R. R. et al. Evaluating the paleomagnetic potential of single zircon crystals using the Bishop Tuff. Earth Plan. Sci. Lett. 458, 1–13 (2017).
Le Sage, D. et al. Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature 496, 486–489 (2013).
Rahn-Lee, L. et al. A genetic strategy for probing the functional diversity of magnetosome formation. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004811 (2015).
Glenn, D. R. et al. Single-cell magnetic imaging using a quantum diamond microscope. Nat. Methods 12, 736–738 (2015).
Grinolds, M. S. et al. Quantum control of proximal spins using nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Phys. 7, 687–692 (2011).
Maurer, P. C. et al. Far-field optical imaging and manipulation of individual spins with nanoscale resolution. Nat. Phys. 6, 912–918 (2010).
Arai, K. et al. Fourier magnetic imaging with nanoscale resolution and compressed sensing speed-up using electronic spins in diamond. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 859–864 (2015).
Kessler, E. M., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum error correction for metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 150802 (2014).
Ajoy, A., Bissbort, U., Lukin, M. D., Walsworth, R. L. & Cappellaro, P. Atomic-scale nuclear spin imaging using quantum-assisted sensors in diamond. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011001 (2015).
Walsworth, R. L. in From Atomic to Mesoscale: The Role of Quantum Coherence in Systems of Various Complexities (eds Malinovskaya, S. A. & Novikova, I.) 91–101 (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2015).
Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).
DiVincenzo, D. P. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschritte der Physik 48, 771–783 (2000).
Friedenauer, A., Schmitz, H., Glueckert, J. T., Porras, D. & Schaetz, T. Simulating a quantum magnet with trapped ions. Nat. Phys. 4, 757–761 (2008).
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hansch, T. W. & Bloch, I. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39–44 (2002).
Glover, P. & Mansfield, S. P. Limits to magnetic resonance microscopy. Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1489–1511 (2002).
Wang, S. X., Labaziewicz, J., Ge, Y., Shewmon, R. & Chuang, I. L. Individual addressing of ions using magnetic field gradients in a surface-electrode ion trap. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 094103 (2009).
Grinolds, M. S. et al. Subnanometre resolution in three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of individual dark spins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 279–284 (2014).
Rugar, D., Budakian, R., Mamin, H. J. & Chui, B. W. Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy. Nature 430, 329–332 (2004).
Jakobi, I. et al. Efficient creation of dipolar coupled nitrogen-vacancy spin qubits in diamond. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 752, 012001 (2016).
Hosten, O., Krishnakumar, R., Engelsen, N. J. & Kasevich, M. A. Quantum phase magnification. Science 352, 1552–1555 (2016).
Yao, N. Y. et al. Scalable architecture for a room temperature solid-state quantum information processor. Nat. Commun. 3, 800 (2012).
Welzel, J. et al. Designing spin-spin interactions with one and two dimensional ion crystals in planar micro traps. Eur. Phys. J. D 65, 285–297 (2011).
Ajoy, A. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum simulation via filtered Hamiltonian engineering: application to perfect quantum transport in spin networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 220503 (2013).
Cai, J., Retzker, A., Jelezko, F. & Plenio, M. B. A large-scale quantum simulator on a diamond surface at room temperature. Nat. Phys. 9, 168–173 (2013).
Roushan, P. et al. Observation of topological transitions in interacting quantum circuits. Nature 515, 241–244 (2014).
Ju, C. et al. NV-center-based digital quantum simulation of a quantum phase transition in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 89, 45432 (2014).
Callaghan, P. T. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy. (Oxford University Press, 1991).
Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. SRIM—the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 268, 1818–1823 (2010).
Trifonov, A. S. et al. in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 62 (eds Arimondo, E., Berman, P. R. & Lin, C. C.) 279–302 (Academic Press, 2013).
Rittweger, E., Han, K., Irvine, S., Eggeling, C. & Hell, S. STED microscopy reveals crystal colour centres with nanometric resolution. Nat. Photon. 3, 144–147 (2009).
Johanning, M. et al. Individual addressing of trapped ions and coupling of motional and spin states using rf radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 73004 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NSF, MURI QuISM, and DARPA QuASAR programmes. We gratefully acknowledge the provision of diamond samples by Element 6 and helpful technical and theoretical discussions with Liang Jiang and Nathalie de Leon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.Z. and K.A. contributed equally to this work. R.L.W. conceived the idea of frequency encoding NV control with microcoils and supervised the project. H.Z., K.A., and C.B. developed measurement protocols, hardware, and software, performed the measurements, and analysed the data. J.-C.J. carried out stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging. All authors discussed the results and participated in writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Arai, K., Belthangady, C. et al. Selective addressing of solid-state spins at the nanoscale via magnetic resonance frequency encoding. npj Quantum Inf 3, 31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0033-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0033-3
This article is cited by
-
Three-dimensional magnetic resonance tomography with sub-10 nanometer resolution
npj Quantum Information (2024)
-
Sub-micron spin-based magnetic field imaging with an organic light emitting diode
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Anisotropy with respect to the applied magnetic field of spin qubit decoherence times
npj Quantum Information (2022)
-
Room-temperature control and electrical readout of individual nitrogen-vacancy nuclear spins
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Triple nitrogen-vacancy centre fabrication by C5N4Hn ion implantation
Nature Communications (2019)