The lateralization of left hippocampal CA3 during the retrieval of spatial working memory

Song, Da; Wang, Deheng; Yang, Qinghu; Yan, Tianyi; Wang, Zhe; Yan, Yan; Zhao, Juan; Xie, Zhen; Liu, Yuchen; Ke, Zunji; Qazi, Talal Jamil; Li, Yanhui; Wu, Yili; Shi, Qing; Lang, Yiran; Zhang, Heao; Huang, Tao; Wang, Chunjian; Quan, Zhenzhen; Qing, Hong

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16698-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 09 June 2020

The lateralization of left hippocampal CA3 during the retrieval of spatial working memory

Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 2901 (2020) Cite this article

7774 Accesses
30 Citations
12 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The hippocampal CA3 contributes to spatial working memory (SWM), but which stage of SWM the CA3 neurons act on and whether the lateralization of CA3 function occurs in SWM is also unknown. Here, we reveal increased neural activity in both sample and choice phases of SWM. Left CA3 (LCA3) neurons show higher sensitivity in the choice phase during the correct versus error trials compared with right CA3 (RCA3) neurons. LCA3 initiates firing prior to RCA3 in the choice phase. Optogenetic suppression of pyramidal neurons in LCA3 disrupts SWM only in the choice phase. Furthermore, we discover that parvalbumin (PV) neurons, rather than cholinergic neurons in the medial septum (DB were cholinergic neurons), can project directly to unilateral CA3. Selective suppression of PV neurons in the MS projecting to LCA3 impairs SWM. The findings suggest that MS^PV-LCA3 projection plays a crucial role in manipulating the lateralization of LCA3 in the retrieval of SWM.

A direct excitatory projection from entorhinal layer 6b neurons to the hippocampus contributes to spatial coding and memory

Article Open access 16 August 2022

Yoav Ben-Simon, Karola Kaefer, … Peter Jonas

Offline ventral subiculum-ventral striatum serial communication is required for spatial memory consolidation

Article Open access 16 December 2019

G. Torromino, L. Autore, … A. Mele

Striatum-projecting prefrontal cortex neurons support working memory maintenance

Article Open access 02 November 2023

Maria Wilhelm, Yaroslav Sych, … Fritjof Helmchen

Introduction

One of the most predominant and fundamental role of hippocampus is illustrated as the formation of a cognitive map that manipulates different sorts of learning and memory both in humans and in nonhuman species¹. In human, the hippocampus is considered anatomically symmetrical, but functionally lateralized (especially in task-related activities). It is reported that the right hippocampus controls spatial information processing and the left takes charge of verbal semantic representations^2,3. A functional MRI study suggests that two hemisphere hippocampi perform a complementary principle on navigation with places information processing on the right and temporal sequences on the left⁴. In a study of neurosurgical patients, hippocampus is shown to have lateralized oscillatory patterns in responsive to memory encoding and navigation⁵. Thus, hippocampal lateralization in spatial cognition is a common phenomenon in higher-order brain function.

Actually, this left-right asymmetry in hippocampal circuitry also occurs in rodents species^6,7,8. It has demonstrated that asymmetrical deficits of hippocampal circuitry caused by asymmetrical distribution of NMDA receptor GluRε2 subunits could impair working memory in several types of mouse models^9,10. Moreover, the hippocampal CA3-CA1 pyramidal neuron synapses are revealed asymmetrical that inputs from RCA3 to CA1 possess larger and more perforated postsynaptic densities and GluR1 expression than that from LCA3, and the lateralization of right hippocampus is further functionally implicated to be responsible for improving the accuracy of spatial memory in animal behavioral tests^11,12. Regarding the asymmetry of CA3-CA1 hippocampal circuitry, optogenetic application further determines inputs from LCA3 to CA1 lead to more long-term potentiation (LTP) than that from RCA3 due to differential GluN2B subunit-containing NMDARs at synapses. Besides, a high-frequency induced LTP is strengthened only when presynaptic input is originated from LCA3, which is crucial to spatial long-term memory^7,8. However, whether the hippocampal CA3 neurons from left to right hemisphere have asymmetrical firing patterns in the working memory process and whether the lateralization is regulated by upstream projecting region to CA3 is still unknown.

Hippocampal CA3 is extensively involved in modulation of encoding cues in SWM, which is featured by storing and processing messages for goal-directed actions in cognition process^13,14. Lesions of dorsal CA3, not dorsal CA1, impair the performance of SWM tasks^15,16. It is recently observed that the dentate gyrus (DG) induced CA3 sharp-wave ripple supports reward-induced SWM¹⁷. However, which exact phase the CA3 neurons act on during the SWM process remains unclear.

To address these issues, we apply fiber photometry in the T-maze delay-no-match-to-place (tDNMTP) task and record the neural activity of subpopulations in different phases of SWM in mice. We reveal that CA3 neurons show increased neural activity in both the sample and the choice phases. More importantly, LCA3 and RCA3 neurons exhibit asymmetrical amplitudes of the increased neural activity in the choice phase during the correct versus the error trials. Single-unit recording demonstrates that LCA3 neurons tend to fire earlier than RCA3 neurons. Optogenetic stimulation of unilateral CA3 suggests LCA3 dominates spatial working memory. Different SWM-related behavioral tasks display the same consequences via optogenetic stimulation. Through combining rabies retrograde monosynaptic tracing and AAVretro retrograde system, we observe that PV and cholinergic neurons in DB were cholinergic neurons/DB have different projection patterns to CA3. MS^PV neurons tend to project unilaterally to CA3. We also demonstrate that selective suppression of MS^PV-LCA3 projecting neurons impairs the performance of SWM in the choice phase.

Together, our data support the lateralization of LCA3 neurons in the retrieval of SWM, and as such the influence of LCA3 in T-maze task is transferable to other diagrams of SWM tasks. MS^PV-LCA3 projection is highlighted in CA3 lateralization in SWM.

Results

Hippocampal CA3 neural activity is lateralized during SWM

To assess the neural activity of hippocampal CA3 neurons, we expressed the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCamP6s in CA3 neurons (Fig. 1a). These neurons reflect action potential firing via fluorescence intensity during fiber photometry recording. The tDNMTP task was employed to test the animals′ SWM^18,19. To measure the behavioral performance, each trial has three phases by sequence: the sample phase, the delay phase, and the choice phase. During the sample phase, one of the two goal arms was blocked and the mouse was allowed to enter the open arm to get the food rewards. When the mouse initiated the sample run with the main arm open, the time point was marked as “sample begin”. The delay phase was defined as 10 s by which the mouse was forced to stay after it returned to the main arm. During the choice phase, with the door removed, the mouse had to choose the arm opposite to the sample phase in order to receive the reward. The time was marked as “choice begin” when the mouse started the choice run.

**Fig. 1: LCA3 neurons show higher amplitude of increased activity in T-maze task.**

For well-trained mice, the fluorescent intensities of the GCamP6 signal were increased in both the sample and the choice runs, especially when the mice initiated to run after the main arm door was reopened. The signal remained unchanged during the 10 s delay phase (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1h), which indicated CA3 neurons are activated during the memory encoding and retrieval phases rather than the delay phase.

As mice were trained from day 1 to day 8, mice achieved stable performance after 4 days of training, with an average success rate of 80%. Interestingly, the CA3 neural activity during the sample and delay phases changed gradually among task days (Fig. 1f). During the first day of the task, only minor increases of Ca²⁺ signal were recorded during the sample and the choice phases. In response to the sample and the choice runs, peaks of increased neural activity gradually increased along with the progress of the task. They reached a plateau after five days of training, which produced a more abundant and stable Ca²⁺ signal (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1f). The amplitudes of the Ca²⁺ activity in CA3 neurons correlated tightly with accumulated experience as the days proceeded (Fig. 1f). In addition, the Ca²⁺ activity was proportional to the success rates (Fig. 1g), suggesting a correlation between a mouse′s CA3 neural activity and working memory performance.

We further analyzed the differences between unilateral CA3 activity in the correct and error trials during the SWM task. In the sample and delay phases, mice in the LCA3- and RCA3-recorded groups showed similar Ca²⁺ amplitude changes between the correct and error trials. Although both LCA3 and RCA3 neurons showed increased amplitude of Ca²⁺ signal in the choice phase regardless of correct and error trials, a significant difference was found in LCA3 between the correct versus the error trials (Fig. 1c, d). LCA3 neurons showed more increased amplitude of Ca²⁺ signal in the correct trials than that in the error trials. This suggested the lateralization of CA3 neurons occurs in the process of SWM, especially LCA3 neurons perform higher neuronal activity in making correct choices.

To exclude the false positive results caused by optical fiber movement, we recorded the eGFP expression in mice, which reflects the activity of CA3 neurons during free movement, and found it unchanged in the T-maze task (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b and e). The CA3 region is also responsible for encoding spatial information. To exclude the possibility that the increasing activity of CA3 neurons was due to specific spatial location (like the T-junction crossing) rather than the task that the mice were performing, we allowed mice running in the T-maze for free movement and exploration. At each time point that a mouse run across the unclosed door in the main arm and intended to go through two goal arms, we measured the GCamP6 response. The results did not show significant changes of GCamP6 signal (Supplementary Fig. 1c), suggesting that the high increase of CA3 neural activity was irrelevant to the location that the mice pass through. Furthermore, we recoded Ca²⁺ signal from free-running mice with a barrier (for 10 s) at the start point of the main arm and found that under non working-memory related task, the mice did not show any increased fluorescent signal (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Also, the signal to noise ratio from day 2 to day 8 remained stable, which could exclude the influence of photodamage or bleaching (Supplementary Fig. 1g). These data implicated that the fluorescent signal is working-memory task dependent.

The bilateral CA3 neural dynamics are defined in tDNMTP task

To investigate the dynamics of a single neuron in bilateral CA3 during SWM task, we performed single-unit recording of mice performing the tDNMTP task to examine the different firing patterns between LCA3 and RCA3 neurons. We managed to record 227 and 197 well-isolated neurons from LCA3 and RCA3 respectively in 6 mice in the choice phase. We recorded the responses of neurons in LCA3 and RCA3 and classified neurons based on the direction, time point, and the magnitude of responses to the choice phase initiation in T-maze task (Fig. 2).

**Fig. 2: LCA3 neurons initiate firing earlier than RCA3 in the choice phase.**

Overall, 70.9% of recorded cells were accounted for the corresponsive cells in LCA3 (62.56%, 142 of 227 units are increased; 8.37%, 19 of 227 units decreased), and similarly, 70.7% were corresponsive cells in RCA3 (65.64%, 128 of 197 units are increased; 5.13%, 10 of 197 units decreased). The non-responsive cells barely differed in LCA3 or RCA3 (Fig. 2a and e). In particular, the recorded neurons with increased activity during the choice phase were divided into three groups based on the characterization of firing time: prediction units (firing before mice initiated the choice phase), main arm units (firing when mice run in the main arm), and location preference units (firing when mice turned into the goal arm) (Supplementary 2c–e). LCA3 contained approximately two-folds of active neurons than RCA3 during the “prediction” behavioral epoch (46.48% in the left, 66 of 142 units; 25.78% in the right, 33 of 128 units). On the contrary, RCA3 had more active neurons during “entering the main arm” behavioral epoch (27.46% in the left, 39 of 142 units; 52.34% in the right, 67 of 128 units) (Fig. 2d, h and j) in comparison to LCA3. Neurons with decreased activity were slightly higher in LCA3 (8.37%, 19 of 227 units) than that in RCA3 (5.13%, 10 of 197 units) (Fig. 2a–b, e–f). We further analyzed the firing consistency of those recorded neurons (26.06%, 37 of 142 units in LCA3; 21.88%, 28 of 128 units in RCA3) with place preference which are only firing at the target arm. The average firing rates of these place preference cells in LCA3 increased during either “left-direction run” or “right-direction run”. This pattern could be also shown in RCA3 (Fig. 2c and g). Most importantly, the time points of firing initiation for prediction and main arm neurons in LCA3 were earlier than that in RCA3 (Fig. 2i). Together the data suggested that asymmetrical distribution of neurons occurs in left-right CA3 and especially LCA3 neurons tend to fire before RCA3 neurons, implicating that LCA3 might be more relevant to SWM.

Inhibition of LCA3 neurons impairs the retrieval of SWM

The neural activity of bilateral CA3 is differentially modulated in the T-maze task, especially during the choice phase. Meanwhile, the asymmetric distribution of the left-right CA3 neurons suggested the lateralization of CA3 in SWM. We next tested how this asymmetrical CA3 neural activity functions in different phases of SWM by applying optogenetic system to inhibit unilateral CA3 pyramidal neurons in different phases of the T-maze task (Fig. 3a).

**Fig. 3: Inhibition of LCA3 impairs the SWM in T-maze task.**

Regarding photo-inhibition of LCA3 pyramidal neurons in the choice phase, well-trained mice hesitated to turn left or right when they reached the T-junction and spent more time on making choices, which led to the disruption of success rates in task performance during the light-on trials. Suppression of LCA3 neural activity in the sample or early/late delay phases (0–5 s/5–10 s inhibition) did not impair task performance (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3a). However, suppression of RCA3 pyramidal neurons did not impair task performance at any phase (Fig. 3c).

We also viewed that activation of LCA3 or RCA3 pyramidal neurons in the choice phases impair task performance (Supplementary Fig. 3b and c). It is noted that CA3 has extensive excitatory interconnection between CA3 pyramidal neurons through commissural fiber synapses and the origin of inputs is from contralateral CA3 pyramidal neurons^16,20. Therefore, we suspected that the activation of RCA3 pyramidal neurons might interfere the intrinsic neural activity of LCA3. To test this hypothesis, we stimulated RCA3 pyramidal neurons while simultaneously recording the neural activity of LCA3 pyramidal neurons. RCA3 pyramidal neurons were activated by injecting AAV-CamKIIα-ChrimsonR-tdTomato which was excited by 590 nm yellow light via right optic fiber, and LCA3 pyramidal neurons were recorded by injecting AAV-Syn-GCamP6s that was excited by constant 470 nm blue light via left optic fiber (Supplementary Fig. 3d). For free moving mice, the fluorescence of GCamP6s signal in LCA3 increased sharply along with the activation of RCA3 pyramidal neurons. This outcome implies that the intrinsic neural activity of LCA3 could be disturbed by activation of RCA3 neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3e).

Since PV interneurons project inhibitory inputs to pyramidal neurons, we hypothesized that the activation of PV interneurons could decrease the firing activity of pyramidal neurons to interfere SWM in mice. To test this hypothesis, we employed optogenetics to activate PV neurons and examined the consequences on SWM. The virus of AAV-DIO-ChETA-EYFP was delivered into unilateral CA3 of PV-Cre mice. We observed that optogenetic activation of PV neurons in LCA3, but not in RCA3, resulted in decreased success rates of task performance during the light-on trials (Supplementary Fig. 3f and g), which produced the same consequence as suppression of pyramidal neurons of LCA3. These suggested that activation of PV neurons suppressed CA3 pyramidal neurons and reduced SWM performance.

To evaluate the effects of contralateral inhibition of CA3 neurons on ipsilateral CA3 neural activity, we expressed NpHR3.0 in contralateral CA3 neurons and GCamP6s in ipsilateral CA3 neurons. We connected two optical fibers on bilateral CA3 to deliver 590 nm light for optogenetic inhibition as well as to detect Ca²⁺ signal, respectively. During the T-maze task, we manipulated NpHR3.0 to suppress ipsilateral CA3 activity in the choice phase, which affected contralateral CA3 activity very slightly (Fig. 3e, f). The distinct activity pattern of LCA3 or RCA3 in the choice phase between the correct or error trials was the same as the choice phase light-off trials (Fig. 3e, f; Fig. 1c, d). This evidence indicated that unilateral CA3 neurons have little impact on the firing patterns of the contralateral CA3 neurons during tDNMTP task.

We next investigated whether the lateralization of hippocampal CA3 in SWM could be transferred to other task diagrams by using two different SWM tasks. Applying a delay-match-to-place task in the water maze (wDMTP)²¹, mice were trained for 6 days. On day 5, unilateral CA3 pyramidal neurons in the second trial were inhibited, when mice needed to retrieve the memory of the platform location from the first trial (Fig. 4a). Compared with day 4 when mice were well trained, inhibition of LCA3 neural activity on day 5 significantly increased the time of finding platform in the second trial, which remained unchanged under inhibition of RCA3 neurons (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile, on day 6, the behavioral performance of the NpHR3.0-expressed group went back to normal, the same as the control group, which indicated there were no side effects of optogenetic stimulation (Fig. 4b). In addition, during the touchscreen-equipped operant chamber delay-no-match-to-location (toDNMTL) task (Fig. 4c), a delay of 2 s did not show any significant changes in task performance when either LCA3 or RCA3 neurons were optogenetically inhibited. Instead, a delay of 5 s significantly decreased the success rates only when LCA3 neurons were inhibited, rather than RCA3 (Fig. 4d). These results confirmed the critical role of LCA3 neurons on the retrieval of SWM.

**Fig. 4: Inhibition of LCA3 impairs the SWM in different tasks.**

MS^PV-LCA3 projection dominates the lateralization in SWM

Though the neural activity of bilateral CA3 both increased at similar levels in T-maze task, that of LCA3 but not RCA3 differed between the correct and error trials. We wondered whether bilateral CA3 neurons receive distinct input projections from upstream brain regions that differentially modulate CA3 neural activity during T-maze task. It has been shown that GABAergic neurons mediating cholinergic neurons in the medial septum and the diagonal band of Broca (MS/DB) have an impact on SWM, while chemical lesions of specific cholinergic neurons in MS leave SWM intact^22,23,24. As such, we chose to investigate the neural specificity of dual projections from MS to bilateral CA3.

To investigate the monosynaptic inputs from MS to PV-positive GABAergic and pyramidal neurons in bilateral CA3, we used the rabies virus (RV) -mediated retrograde trans-synaptic tracing system. We first expressed avian-specific retroviral vector TVA containing rabies glycoprotein (RG) specifically in PV or pyramidal cells of CA3. This formula was created by injecting a mixture of two Cre-dependent AAV vectors (AAV-DIO-TVA-BFP and AAV-DIO-RVG) to the bilateral CA3 of CamKII-Cre mice or PV-Cre mice. Three weeks later, the same mice received unilateral injections of the EnVA-pseudotyped RΔG-GFP or EnVA-pseudotyped RΔG into the same region of the bilateral CA3 and were then sacrificed after seven days of RV injection (Fig. 5a). Our results revealed that input neurons are predominantly located in MS. Immunohistochemical analysis was employed to identify the types of input cells in MS. For CamKIIα-Cre mice, 25.9% of the RV-labeled neurons were cholinergic neurons, and only 2.8% of RV-labeled neurons were PV positive (mCherry⁺white⁺ or GFP⁺white⁺) (Fig. 5b, c, f). This suggested cholinergic and PV neurons in MS form monosynaptic connections with pyramidal neurons in unilateral CA3. There are a few overlapping neurons that were co-labeled with GFP and mCherry (6.15%). Among these overlapping cells, a majority of them were cholinergic neurons (58.33%, mCherry⁺GFP⁺white⁺) (Fig. 5f), indicating MS cholinergic neurons can also project to pyramidal neurons in bilateral CA3. For PV-Cre mice, 17.4% of RV-labeled neurons in MS/DB were cholinergic neurons and 11.8% were PV-positive neurons (mCherry⁺white⁺ or GFP⁺white⁺). However, GFP⁺ and mCherry⁺ cells were seldom overlapped in MS, suggesting neurons projected from MS to the unilateral CA3 PV neurons form monosynaptic connections and function separately (Fig. 5d–f). These suggested PV neurons in MS/DB mainly form monosynaptic connections with the PV neurons in unilateral CA3.

**Fig. 5: MS^PV neurons form monosynaptic connections with unilateral CA3.**

Previous studies proposed that the cholinergic neurons in MS projecting to the hippocampus form two types of synaptic structures, the formation of typical monosynaptic connections and the dispersed release of acetylcholine to the hippocampus rather than forming synapses²⁵. In order to fully understand how MS cholinergic neurons project to CA3, we also applied AAV retrograde tracing system due to the specific property of retroviruses being absorbed by the axon terminus of neurons. AAV-retro-Cre and AAV-retro-Flpo viruses were injected into the bilateral CA3, respectively. In addition, the mixture of AAV-DIO-GFP and AAV-fDIO-tdTomato were injected into MS region. Mice were sacrificed after five weeks of injection (Fig. 5g). Images showed that 23.64% of cells were overlapped, and among these cells, 70.29% were cholinergic neurons (Fig. 5h, i and j), implying that though a portion of MS cholinergic neurons can project to bilateral CA3, they do not form synaptic structures. Comprehensively, these data approved the monosynaptic connections with unilateral CA3 neurons are mainly projected from MS^PV neurons, rather than MS cholinergic neurons, which suggested that MS^PV neurons may play a crucial role in CA3 lateralization in SWM.

The lateralization of MS^PV-CA3 neurons is SWM task dependent

To examine the functionality of the projection of MS^PV/Chat → CA3 neurons, we applied in vivo recordings of bilateral CA3 neurons during activation of MS^PV/Chat neurons by expressing AAV-DIO-ChETA-EYFP in MS of PV-Cre mice or Chat-Cre mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a, d). In PV-Cre mice, we recorded a proportion of neurons with increased activities in LCA3 (38.46%, 5 of 13 units) and in RCA3 (24.25%, 8 of 33 units) by 20 Hz stimulation of PV neurons in MS (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c). Similarly, in Chat-Cre mice, neurons with increased activities in LCA3 (10%, 2 of 20 units) and RCA3 (9.09%, 2 of 22 units) were also recorded, though in less numbers and with lower firing rates than that in PV-Cre mice (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f). These data implicated the functional connectivity of the projections from MS^PV/Chat to CA3 neurons.

To reveal the left-right lateralization of CA3 function on SWM, we explored the influences of MS^PV/Chat → CA3 pathway on SWM through optogenetic inhibition. We expressed NpHR3.0 in MS^PV/Chat -LCA3 (or RCA3) projecting neurons by injecting AAVretro-Flex-Flpo into LCA3 or RCA3 and AAV-fDIO-NpHR3.0-mcherry into MS of PV-Cre mice (Fig. 6a) or Chat-Cre mice (Fig. 6d). The immunofluorescent staining showed that there were co-localized cells (mCherry⁺white⁺) in both PV-Cre and Chat-Cre mice, proving that the projection neurons from MS were PV-positive or Chat positive neurons (Fig. 6b, e). We inhibited NpHR3.0 labeled neurons in the choice phase through applying 590 nm laser in the experimental group (or 470 nm in control group) and found that the PV-Cre mice showed impaired performance of the T-maze task in MS^PV-LCA3 group, while there were no obvious changes of task performance in the MS^PV-RCA3 group (Fig. 6c). However, the Chat-Cre mice did not show significant differences of success rates of T-maze task when either MS^Chat-LCA3 or MS^Chat-RCA3 was inhibited in the choice phase (Fig. 6f). These suggested that MS^PV-CA3 neurons, rather than MS^Chat-CA3 neurons, that are distributed unilaterally to CA3, mainly contribute to the LCA3 dominance in the choice phase of SWM.

**Fig. 6: Inhibition of MS^PV-LCA3 projection impairs the retrieval of SWM.**

Discussion

Hippocampal CA3 has been widely known to involve in memory encoding and recall within second-long intervals, and be well adapted for the rapid storage and retrieval of associative memories. Dorsal CA3 has been reported to affect the tDNMTP task via Fimbria from MS through permanent lesions^26,27. However, the different phases of SWM in eight-arm radial maze may not be discriminated well. We found that CA3 neuronal firing rates were increased when the choice phase was initiated, and remained unchanged when mice reached the reward at the end of the goal arm. Inhibition of LCA3 pyramidal neurons (or activation of CA3 PV neurons) in the choice phase impaired SWM performance, while this suppression in the sample or delay phase kept SWM intact. This suggests that LCA3 dominates the retrieval of SWM.

It has been evidenced that LCA3 and RCA3 in CA1 show different postsynaptic projections⁷. Only LCA3 presynaptic input induced high-frequency stimulation could increase LTP⁸. However, it is still unclear that how the neural firing patterns in LCA3 or RCA3 mediate SWM. Moreover, the possible projection pathways between CA3 and other brain regions in regulating SWM remain unknown. Our data indicated that the subpopulation of CA3 neurons expresses different neural activity between LCA3 and RCA3 in the choice phase of SWM. Though similar fractions of neural units recorded in LCA3 and RCA3 were found to be responsive to the choice phase during tasks, LCA3 contains more active prediction neurons than RCA3 and LCA3 neurons tended to initiate firing much earlier than RCA3 neurons. These data implicated LCA3 might play an essential role in the choice phase of SWM.

It has been proposed that inhibitory neurons (mostly interneurons, INs) interact with each other, form neural circuitry of inhibitory synaptic connections and also reciprocally connect with and regulate other excitatory neurons to manipulate learning and memory^28,29,30. Activation of PV-positive interneurons was found to be highly effective in suppressing pyramidal neuronal activity^31,32. Dan team claimed that suppression of pyramidal neuronal activity by activation of PV-positive interneurons could impair the memory-guided task performance³³. In CA3, the neuronal excitability, firing and synaptic integration of its pyramidal neurons can be regulated by receiving strong and diverse GABAergic inputs, such as PV-positive cells, PV-containing axo-axonic cells, which has been reported to be able to regulate the spiking of CA3 pyramidal neurons^16,34. This is a strong support for our selection of activating PV interneurons as a choice for suppressing pyramidal neurons in LCA3. As expected, the SWM was affected by activation of PV interneurons similarly as that by only inhibition of LCA3 pyramidal cells.

It is well known that CA3 plays specific roles in hippocampal function and memory, especially for the sparse inputs from the DG to CA3 and for the extended local recurrent connectivity that operates the CA3 forming extensive excitatory interconnections between CA3 pyramidal cells through associative and commissural (A/C) fiber synapses¹⁶. Our data suggested inhibition of LCA3 pyramidal neurons, rather than RCA3, could reduce the success rates of mice in the choice phase of tDNMTP tasks. However, activation of either LCA3 or RCA3 pyramidal neurons in the choice phase impairs the task performances. We speculated that the activation of RCA3 pyramidal neurons might interfere the intrinsic neural activity of LCA3 and this was confirmed by the results that the GCamP6s signal in LCA3 increased sharply along with the activation of RCA3 pyramidal neurons. We also performed experiments to exclude the effects of contralateral inhibition of CA3 neurons on ipsilateral CA3 neural activity. The data suggested that suppression of the ipsilateral CA3 neuronal activity in the choice phase seldom affects the contralateral CA3 neuronal activity, strongly implicating the critical role of LCA3 neurons on the retrieval of SWM.

Though application of optogenetics on neuroscience has been widely accepted recent years, it is not deniable that some disadvantages of its use, such as, the intensity of laser or the time duration of stimulation, need to be concerned. It was reported that higher intensive laser or prolonged stimulation by laser light can produce heat to brain tissue and thereby lead to inhibition or damages of the neuronal activity as well as behavioral ability in the absence of opsins^35,36. Regarding this, we limited the time durations of laser stimulation between 3 and 5 s, which could not only cover the initiation of the choice phase (which means it can cover the time points of firing of those prediction and main arm neurons), but also avoid the side effects caused by the high intensity and long-lasted stimulation of laser light. In our optogenetic experiments, light was turned on at the same time as the door was open during the sample and the choice run, so 590/470 nm of laser manipulation could cover the beginning of the initiation of the choice run. In particular, 590 nm of laser was lasted for 5 s for the inhibition of CA3 neurons, while 470 nm of laser was lasted for 3 s for activation of CA3 neurons, avoiding the epilepsy seizure of mice by 5 s activation. Nevertheless, the GtACR1, a new tool of silencing neurons by optogenetics has been recently created, can be activated by much powerless laser to inhibit targeted neurons than NpHR3.0³⁷. It would be considered for inhibiting neurons in future studies.

Retrograde trans-synaptic rabies virus system is prevalently applied in brain-wide maps on cell-type-dependent global scale input patterns. As one of the upstream projecting regions to the hippocampus, the MS/DB has been emerged as a key modulator for hippocampal function via septo-hippocampal pathway. Both GABAergic and cholinergic neurons in MS/DB are correlated with learning and memory and hippocampal rhythmogenesis^22,38. Earlier studies have demonstrated that the septal cholinergic neurons project diffusely to both the interneurons and pyramidal neurons in hippocampus, which is contrast with the GABAergic MS/DB neurons that exclusively innervate hippocampal interneurons^39,40. Dannenberg H team proposed that PV neurons in MS/DB would be recruited by cholinergic neurons to selectively innervate hippocampal interneurons and be responsible for precise synchronization of hippocampal networks⁴¹. It was found that GABAergic lesions of the MS/DB in rats could impair the hippocampal acetylcholine efflux and the spatial working memory in the tDNMTP tasks²². Recent study also demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of MS-PV neurons could recover slow gamma oscillations in hippocampus and rescue the spatial memory of AD model mice⁴². In our data, we mapped the anatomical specificity and organization of MS to unilateral CA3 with distinct neuronal types. We revealed that MS cholinergic neurons mainly project to bilateral CA3 pyramidal neurons, while PV neurons in MS project to unilateral CA3 neurons. Selective suppression of MS^PV-LCA3 projecting neurons impaired the performance of SWM during the choice phase, suggesting that PV neurons in MS have potential to dominate the lateralization of LCA3 in SWM. Regarding the global effects of MS GABAergic inputs to hippocampus, whether MS GABAergic inputs function similarly to regulate hippocampal CA3 via manipulating its oscillatory patterns, or whether the influence on the process of memory was permissive, should be addressed. Further exploration would focus on revealing whether the lateralization of LCA3 would be associated with the oscillatory modulation of MS GABAergic inputs to hippocampal CA3 and what types of CA3 neurons would be involved in this modulation.

Our findings also revealed that the MS^PV-LCA3 projection dominates SWM task, but does not show remarkable effects compared with MS^PV-RCA3 without performing task, suggesting the lateralization of LCA3 is task dependent. Actually, some studies have reported similar findings that the left prioritization usually occurs along with tasks. In human behavioral research, not only hippocampus, but also dorsolateral prefrontal cortex show lateralization, which are tasks related, such as spatial memory and navigational tasks^5,43.

It was reported that the β2 oscillations (23–23 Hz) in CA3 showed strong bursts when mice explore novel, rather than familiar, environments; the theta (10 Hz) and beta (20 Hz) band synchronization of neuronal firing patterns and local field potential activity in mice CA1 increased in the reward cue tasks^38,44. To detect the neuronal firing changes, we selected 20 Hz for stimulation of MS neurons and recorded neurons with increased activities in CA3 in both PV-Cre and Chat-Cre mice, suggesting the projections from MS^PV/Chat to CA3 are functionally connected.

Overall, our results indicate that the lateralization of LCA3 plays a vital role in SWM, especially during memory retrieval. The PV and cholinergic neurons in MS have different projection patterns to CA3. MS^PV neurons tend to project to unilateral CA3 and form functional connections, which affects the behavior of SWM in mice. Our data provides an insight into the lateralization of LCA3 during the retrieval of SWM.

Methods

Approvals

All surgical and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

Subjects

Adult (2–4-month-old) male and female WT (WT, C57/BL6), PV-Cre (Jax Stock no. 008069), CamKIIα-Cre (Jax Stock no. 013044) and Chat-Cre mice (Jax Stock no. 006140) mice were used. Mice were group-housed on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (2–5 animals per cage) at a consistent ambient temperature (23 ± 1 °C) and humidity (50 ± 5%), and all experiments were performed during the light cycle. Food and water were accessed ad libitum, except when on food restriction during behavioral tests. Littermates were randomly assigned to each condition by the experimenter. Only male mice were used in the behavioral tests.

Viruses

For rabies virus-mediated retrograde tracing, AAV9- Ef1α-DIO-RVG (titer, 5.1 × 10¹² genome copies (gc) per ml), AAV9-Ef1α-DIO-BFP-TVA (titer, 5.1 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹), and EnvA-pseudotyped, glycoprotein (RG)-deleted rabies virus RV-EvnA-GFP (titer, 6.50 × 10⁸ colony forming units (cfu) per ml) and RV-EvnA-mCherry (titer, 5.00 × 10⁸ cfu ml⁻¹) were purchased from Brain VTA, Wuhan, China.

AAVs particles (AAV9-Syn-GCamP6s, titer, 3.5 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-CamKIIα-ChR2-EYFP, titer, 5.1 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-CamKIIα-EYFP, titer, 4.2 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-CamKIIα-NpHR3.0-mCherry, titer, 5.1 × 10¹²gc ml⁻¹; AAV8-CamKIIα-ChrimsonR-mCherry, titer, 2.8 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAVretro-Syn-Cre, titer, 1.5 × 10¹³ gc ml⁻¹; AAVretro-Syn-Flpo, titer, 1.2 × 10¹³ gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-Ef1α-DIO-GFP, titer, 3.0 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-Ef1α-fDIO-tdTomato, titer, 6.2 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹; AAV9-Ef1α-DIO-ChETA-EYFP, titer, 4.2 × 10¹² gc ml⁻¹) were purchased from Taitool, Shanghai, China.

Stereotaxic injections

The animals were deeply anesthetized and placed in a stereotactic frame (RWD, Shenzhen, China). Ophthalmic ointment was applied to prevent dehydration. The virus was injected by a 10 µL Hamilton microsyringe at a constant speed with a microsyringe pump (UMP3; WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA) and controller (Micro4; WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA). After viral injection was completed, the needle was held still for 10 min to allow the diffusion of the virus. The needle was then withdrawn slowly and completely.

Measurement of optic fiber transmissivity: we measured light intensity at the laser launch, tip of the coupled fiber (diameter, 200 μm; Ferrule O.D, 1.25 mm; N.A., 0.37; length, 3.0 or 4.0 mm; Inper Inc., China), and the fiber ferrule implant by optical power meter (PM121D, thorlab, USA). Fiber ferules were sorted based on optical transmissivity (>80%). We measured intensity at the coupled fiber before connecting to the implanted fiber ferrule and connecting to each animal every day. The intensity was kept to adjust to certain power (ChR2/ChETA simulation: 1 mW; NpHR3.0 stimulation:10 mW; fiber photometry: 40 μW).

For fiber photometry recordings, 300 nl of AAV-Syn-GCamP6s was injected into the left or right hemisphere of CA3 region (anteroposterior (AP): −2.06 mm; mediolateral (ML): ± 2.35 mm; dorsoventral (DV): −2.35 mm). Also, Fiber ferrule was placed 50 μm above the viral injection site. The optical fiber was secured to the skull using jeweler′s screws and dental cement.

For optogenetic stimulation of CA3 neurons experiments, 300 nl of AAV2/8-CamKIIα-eNpHR3.0-EYFP, 300 nl of AAV2/8-CamKIIα-ChR2 (H134R)-EYFP or 300 nl of AAV2/8-CamKIIα-EYFP was injected into left or right hemisphere of CA3 region (AP: −2.06 mm; ML: ± 2.35 mm; DV: −2.35 mm). The fiber ferrule was placed 100 μm above the virus injection site and secured with dental cement and jeweler′s screws.

For fiber photometry recoding and optogenetic stimulation in contralateral CA3 concurrently, 300 nl of AAV2/9-CamKIIα-NpHR3.0-mcherry (or AAV2/8-CamKIIα-ChrimsonR-mCherry) and 300 nl of AAV5-Syn-GCamp6s was injected into left or right hemisphere of CA3 (AP: −2.06 mm; ML: ± 2.35 mm; DV: −2.35 mm). The optical fiber was placed 50 or 100 μm above the virus injection site and secured with jeweler′s screws and dental cement.

For rabies tracing experiments, AAV9-Ef1α-DIO-BFP-TVA and AAV9- Ef1α-DIO-RVG (volume ratio: 1:1, the total volume of 400 nl) were injected into the dual CA3 regions of CamkIIα-Cre and PV-Cre mice at the following coordinates: AP: −2.06 mm; ML: ± 2.35 mm; DV: −2.35 mm. Four weeks later, RV-EnVA-EGFP and RV-EnVA-mCherry (volume, 350 nl) were injected into the unilateral CA3 separately. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after rabies virus infection.

For AAVretro tracing experiments, AAVretro-Syn-Cre and AAVretro-Syn-Flpo (each volume of 300 nl) were injected into the bilateral CA3 regions at the following coordinates: AP: −2.06 mm; ML: ± 2.35 mm; DV: −2.35 mm. AAV9-Ef1α-DIO-GFP and AAV9-Ef1α-fDIO-tdTomato (volume ratio: 1:1, total volume of 400 nl) were injected into MS at the following coordinates: AP: 0.8 mm; ML: 0 mm; DV: −3.8 mm.

For in vivo neurophysiological experiments, mice were implanted with a moveable microdriver consisting of a 32-channel electronic interface board. A total of eight tetrodes was assembled and mounted onto the microdriver. A tetrode consists of four 25 mm platinum (with 10% iridium) wires (California Fine Wire, USA). The tetrode bundle was then targeted to the CA3 region.

For MS^PV-CA3 or MS^Chat-CA3 recording, 200 nl of AAV2/9-Ef1α-DIO-ChETA-EYFP was injected into MS (AP: 0.86 mm; ML: ± 0.2 mm; DV: −3.5 mm) in PV-Cre or Chat-Cre mice. Tetrodes were targeted to CA3 region.

Immunohistochemistry

Mice were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Brains were extracted, removed and kept in 4% PFA for at least 24 h. Next, brains were transferred to 30% sucrose dissolved in PBS until they sank to the bottom of the container and were then sliced into 50 µm coronal sections using a freezing microtome (Leica, CM3050 S, Germany). The sections were stored at −20 °C in PBS containing 30% glycerol (v per v), 30% ethylene glycol (v per v) until they were processed.

For immunofluorescence staining, free-floating sections were washed with PBS three times (5 min each) and incubated with blocking buffer that contained 5% donkey serum dissolved in 0.3% PBST (0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 2 h. Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer (2.5% donkey serum) overnight at 4 °C. After incubation, the sections were washed three times (5 min each) with PBST and incubated with a fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500, Abcam, UK) for 2 h at room temperature. Following three washes (5 min each time) with PBS, sections were mounted under coverslips. Primary antibodies used were: anti-Chat (1:1000, goat, AB144P, Millipore, USA), anti-PV (1:2000, rabbit, PV27, Swant, USA), anti-2A peptide antibody (1:1000, mouse NBP2-59627SS, Novus Biologicals, USA). Images were acquired and analyzed with a NIS-Elements AR confocal microscope and Image J.

Fiber photometry recording

An apparatus for performing fiber photometry recording was obtained from the Thinker Tech Nanjing Biotech Limited Co., Nanjing, China. The signal was digitized and collected by ThorCam-DAQ software. After three weeks of GCamP6s virus expression, calcium signal was recorded when the mouse performed tDNMTP. The timing of behavioral variables was recorded by the same system. The behavioral processes and calcium signal were synchronized and analyzed by the custom-written Matlab software (The MathWorks, Inc., USA).

For calculating GCamP6s signal, relative fluorescence changes of ΔF/F were calculated as Ca²⁺ signal as follows:

$$\Delta {\mathrm{F}}/{\mathrm{F}} = \left( {{\mathrm{F}}_{{\mathrm{raw}}} - {\mathrm{F}}_{{\mathrm{baseline}}}} \right)/{\mathrm{F}}_{{\mathrm{baseline}}},$$

(1)

where the F_baseline was the baseline fluorescence taken when mice stay in the home cage for 30 s before the T-maze task.

Signal variation of GCamP6s in choice phases was calculated as follows:

$${\mathrm{Signal}}\;{\mathrm{Variation}} = {\mathrm{Mean}}\;{\mathrm{Signal}}\left( {1,\;2} \right) - {\mathrm{Mean}}\;{\mathrm{Signal}}\left( { - 5, - 1} \right).$$

(2)

Mean signal (1, 2) stands for the mean increased signal in the time course from 1 s to 2 s, and Mean signal (−5, −1) stands for the mean signal of baseline in the time course from −5 s to −1 s.

In vivo single-unit recording

Single unite data was captured across animals (3 mice for LCA3 recording, 3 mice for RCA3 recording). After surgery, mice were allowed for recovery at least one week before recording. Multichannel extracellular signals were recorded from the bilateral hippocampal CA3. Movable microdrivers were advanced around 70 μm daily until we could record the maximal units from target brain area. Signals were amplified, band-pass filtered (0.5–1000 Hz for LFPs and 0.6–6 kHz for spikes) and digitized using the Plexon OmniPlex Neural Data Acquisition System (Dallas, TX, USA). Spikes, detected at adjustable online thresholds, were collected at 40 kHz. Single units were clustered in Offline Sorter and MClust 4.4 program (A. D. Redish, http://redishlab.neuroscience.umn.edu/MClust/MClust.html).

Single-unit recording analysis

A peri-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) for the time points of the sample or choice begin was calculated with 50 ms between −5 s and 5 s relative to the sample or choice phases for each neuron. From this, the mean μ and standard deviation σ of the firing rate (−5 s to 5 s) were calculated and used to generate the Z-score normalization:

$${\mathrm{Z}} - {\mathrm{score}} = \frac{{{\rm{PSTH}} - \mu }}{\sigma }.$$

(3)

Place preference neurons were determined from 1 s after goal arrival on all left versus right trials in the sample or choice phases. The z-scored firing rate within 1 s of sample phase on all left-versus-right trials was used to determine the significance of L/R CA3 neurons (Wilcoxon′s rank-sum test, P < 0.005).

Increased activity was determined from z-scored firing rates calculated in 50 ms bins. If a single neuron exhibited a z-scored firing rate beyond 2 s.d. for four or more consecutive bins from −1 s to 2 s, it was classified as an increased neuron. The time point of first bin which is beyond 2 s.d. used to classify the prediction neurons (from −1 s to 0 s) or main arm neurons (from 0 s to 2 s).

Decreased activity was determined from z-scored firing rates calculated in 50 ms bins. If a single neuron exhibited a z-scored firing rate beyond −2 s.d. for four or more consecutive bins from −1 s to 2 s, it was classified as a decreased neuron.

MS^PV-CA3 and MS^Chat-CA3 recording

Increased/decreased neurons: the averaged firing rate was significantly increased/decreased between baseline window of 1 s prior to 470 nm laser onset and response window of 1 s during laser delivery. The time window for Z-scored calculation is 100 ms (Wilcoxon′s rank-sum test, P < 0.05).

T-maze for delayed no-match-to-place (tDNMTP) task

tDNMTP task was performed to test spatial working memory by manual operation. Mice were gradually food restricted until they reached 85% body weight. Mice were habituated to the T-maze over two days, during which mice were placed into the T-maze for 10 min. 50 μl of 50% sweet-milk reward was placed in the reward tube at the end of choice arms. Once experiments began, mice were given ten trials per day. Each trial was consisted of the sample run, delay and choice run.

On the sample run, the mouse was forced to enter the left or right arm to consume the sweet-milk reward, while the other arm was blocked by a door. Then the mouse came back in the start position. On the choice run, the blocked door was removed and the mouse was allowed to choose one of the goal arms. The time interval between the sample and choice run was 10 s. If the mouse visited the non-sample arm, it was allowed to acquire the reward. If the animal visited sample arm, it could not receive the reward. If the mouse was consumed the reward, this was scored as a correct trial. The time interval from one trial to the next was about 1 min. After rewards, the mice were allowed to return to the start point by themselves, however, if the mice could not return to the start point by themselves 15 s after feeding, they will be forced to return to the start point. Mice were trained for 10 trials per day until the performance of success at 90% in two consecutive days and then performed opto-stimulating process. On each day, mice had five starts from the left of the sample arm runs and five starts from the right in a pseudorandom order with no more than three consecutive starts from the left or right.

Touchscreen for delayed no-match-to-location (toDNMTL)task

A trial of this task consists of three phases, the sample, delay and choice phases. The sample phase was initiated by starting one stimulus that displays (a white square) in left or right locations on the screen and the stimulus disappeared once the mice had a nose-poke of it (the sample). The mice were allowed to delay for 2 or 5 s. To start the next choice phase, the second initiation procedure was designed to prevent mice from mediating during the delay period by waiting in front of to-be correct or to-be-error location. In the choice phase, two stimuli were designed that one was in the old (sample, incorrect) location and the other in the new (correct) location on the other side. Mice touching to the correct location were rewarded and allowed to entering an inter-trial interval (ITI) for the next trial, but a touch to the incorrect location was treated as a 5 s time-out and then an ITI, either followed by correction trials. Mice were allowed to make correction trials that were followed the same procedures as normal trials, excluding the condition that the same sample and choice locations from the previous incorrect trial were kept until mice made the correct choice. Data was acquired with ABET II Touch 2.20.

Water maze for delayed match-to-place (wDMTP) task

The delayed matching-to-place task in water maze test was performed successively in six consecutive days. Briefly, the water maze was 1.2 m in diameter, with a 10-cm-dameter circular escape platform. The water temperature was kept at 22–23 °C. The platform, which was placed 1 cm below the surface of the water, was randomly located in one of the four quadrants every day and not in the same quadrant for 2 consecutive days. Mice were given four trials with an interval of 10 s each day at the same starting position. The location of hidden platform was fixed on the same day. Before experiment began, the platform was located above the surface of the water and marked by an attached flag to provide a cue with four trials for one day. The first and second trials each day were used to evaluate working memory by calculating the percentage of latency of finding the platform during the second trial (second trial/first trial). The third and fourth trials were used to train the animal to learn for the day. Data were acquired with EthoVision XT 12.

Behavioral tests coupled with optogenetic Manipulation

For the tDNMTP task, mice were given 470 nm or 590 nm light stimulating after the percentage of success rates reach 90% in two consecutive days. For optogenetic inhibition of CA3 using eNpHR3.0, and 10 mW of constant yellow light was delivered and sustained for 5 s by a 590 nm DPSS laser (10 mW, constant light on). For optogenetic using hChR2 (H134R), 470 nm DPSS laser would generate a train of blue light pulses (1 mW, 20 Hz, 5 ms duration) and sustained for 3 s. All of the light on stages were at the stage of the sample phase, the first 5 s/the last 5 s of the delay phase, and the choice phase, respectively. A completed test lasted three consecutive days and each day included three processes (light off, light on and light off).

For the wDMTP task, mice were stimulated with 470 nm light at the second trial in the day 5. For eNpHR3.0 mice, the 590 nm constant light was sustained for 5 s.

For the toDNMTL task, mice were stimulated with 590 nm light when the choice phase initiated and lasted 5 s.

For the home cage optogenetic simulation coupled with single unite recoding, mice were stimulated with 470 nm light (1 mW, 20 Hz, 5 ms duration), which sustained 1 s.

Statistical analysis and reproducibility

A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess significant interactions of light vs group in behavioral experiments. Bonferroni-corrected P values were used and indicated for multiple comparisons. Two group comparisons were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed t-test. In single-unit recording with nonparametric data, we used Wilcoxon′s signed-rank test for paired calculation and Mann-Whitney-U-test in unpaired observations. All of the statistical details of experiments can be found in the figure legends and Supplementary Table 1. Data was presented as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0.

Each experiment has been repeated three times in the manuscript with similar results.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All the relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding authors upon request. The source data are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Knierim, J. J. The hippocampus. Curr. Biol.: CB 25, R1116–R1121 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hutsler, J. & Galuske, R. A. Hemispheric asymmetries in cerebral cortical networks. Trends Neurosci. 26, 429–435 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abrahams, S., Pickering, A., Polkey, C. E. & Morris, R. G. Spatial memory deficits in patients with unilateral damage to the right hippocampal formation. Neuropsychologia 35, 11–24 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Igloi, K., Doeller, C. F., Berthoz, A., Rondi-Reig, L. & Burgess, N. Lateralized human hippocampal activity predicts navigation based on sequence or place memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14466–14471 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, J. et al. Lateralized hippocampal oscillations underlie distinct aspects of human spatial memory and navigation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2423 (2018).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
El-Gaby, M., Shipton, O. A. & Paulsen, O. Synaptic plasticity and memory: new insights from hippocampal left-right asymmetries. Neuroscientist: a Rev. J. bringing Neurobiol., Neurol. psychiatry 21, 490–502 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kohl, M. M. et al. Hemisphere-specific optogenetic stimulation reveals left-right asymmetry of hippocampal plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1413–1415 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shipton, O. A. et al. Left-right dissociation of hippocampal memory processes in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15238–15243 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goto, K. et al. Left-right asymmetry defect in the hippocampal circuitry impairs spatial learning and working memory in iv mice. PloS ONE 5, e15468 (2010).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Goto, K. & Ito, I. The asymmetry defect of hippocampal circuitry impairs working memory in beta2-microglobulin deficient mice. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 139, 50–55 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shinohara, Y. et al. Left-right asymmetry of the hippocampal synapses with differential subunit allocation of glutamate receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19498–19503 (2008).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shinohara, Y. et al. Right-hemispheric dominance of spatial memory in split-brain mice. Hippocampus 22, 117–121 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Spellman, T. et al. Hippocampal-prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory. Nature 522, 309–314 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abbas, A. I. et al. Somatostatin interneurons facilitate hippocampal-prefrontal synchrony and prefrontal spatial encoding. Neuron 100, 926–939.e923 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Witter, M. P. Intrinsic and extrinsic wiring of CA3: indications for connectional heterogeneity. Learn Mem. 14, 705–713 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rebola, N., Carta, M. & Mulle, C. Operation and plasticity of hippocampal CA3 circuits: implications for memory encoding. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 208–220 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sasaki, T. et al. Dentate network activity is necessary for spatial working memory by supporting CA3 sharp-wave ripple generation and prospective firing of CA3 neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 258–269 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Deacon, R. M. Appetitive position discrimination in the T-maze. Nat. Protoc. 1, 13–15 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Deacon, R. M. & Rawlins, J. N. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nat. Protoc. 1, 7–12 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kesner, R. P. Behavioral functions of the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus. Learn Mem. 14, 771–781 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ruzicka, J., Kulijewicz-Nawrot, M., Rodrigez-Arellano, J. J., Jendelova, P. & Sykova, E. Mesenchymal stem cells preserve working memory in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer′s disease. Int J Mol Sci 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020152 (2016).
Roland, J. J. et al. Medial septum-diagonal band of Broca (MSDB) GABAergic regulation of hippocampal acetylcholine efflux is dependent on cognitive demands. J. Neurosci. 34, 506–514 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wisman, L. A., Sahin, G., Maingay, M., Leanza, G. & Kirik, D. Functional convergence of dopaminergic and cholinergic input is critical for hippocampus-dependent working memory. J. Neurosci. 28, 7797–7807 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Salib, M., Viney, T. J., Dupret, D. & Somogyi, P. Behavior-dependent activity and synaptic organization of septo-hippocampal GABAergic neurons selectively targeting the hippocampal CA3 area. Neuron 96, 1342–1357.e1345 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Generation of a whole-brain atlas for the cholinergic system and mesoscopic projectome analysis of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 415–420 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. E. & Kesner, R. P. The role of the dorsal CA3 hippocampal subregion in spatial working memory and pattern separation. Behav. Brain Res 169, 142–149 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hunsaker, M. R., Allan, K. D. & Kesner, R. P. Role of dCA3 efferents via the fimbria in the acquisition of a delay nonmatch to place task. Hippocampus 17, 494–502 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pfeffer, C. K., Xue, M., He, M., Huang, Z. J. & Scanziani, M. Inhibition of inhibition in visual cortex: the logic of connections between molecularly distinct interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1068–1076 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Donato, F., Rompani, S. B. & Caroni, P. Parvalbumin-expressing basket-cell network plasticity induced by experience regulates adult learning. Nature 504, 272–276 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Letzkus, J. J., Wolff, S. B. & Luthi, A. Disinhibition, a circuit mechanism for associative learning and memory. Neuron 88, 264–276 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pi, H. J. et al. Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control. Nature 503, 521–524 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Selective attention. Long-range and local circuits for top-down modulation of visual cortex processing. Science 345, 660–665 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kamigaki, T. & Dan, Y. Delay activity of specific prefrontal interneuron subtypes modulates memory-guided behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 854–863 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hajos, N. et al. Input-output features of anatomically identified CA3 neurons during hippocampal sharp wave/ripple oscillation in vitro. J. Neurosci. 33, 11677–11691 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cardozo Pinto, D. F. & Lammel, S. Hot topic in optogenetics: new implications of in vivo tissue heating. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1039–1041 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Owen, S. F., Liu, M. H. & Kreitzer, A. C. Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1061–1065 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Govorunova, E. G., Sineshchekov, O. A., Janz, R., Liu, X. & Spudich, J. L. NEUROSCIENCE. Natural light-gated anion channels: a family of microbial rhodopsins for advanced optogenetics. Science 349, 647–650 (2015).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berke, J. D., Hetrick, V., Breck, J. & Greene, R. W. Transient 23–30 Hz oscillations in mouse hippocampus during exploration of novel environments. Hippocampus 18, 519–529 (2008).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hangya, B., Borhegyi, Z., Szilagyi, N., Freund, T. F. & Varga, V. GABAergic neurons of the medial septum lead the hippocampal network during theta activity. J. Neurosci. 29, 8094–8102 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Frotscher, M. & Leranth, C. Cholinergic innervation of the rat hippocampus as revealed by choline acetyltransferase immunocytochemistry: a combined light and electron microscopic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 239, 237–246 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dannenberg, H. et al. Synergy of direct and indirect cholinergic septo-hippocampal pathways coordinates firing in hippocampal networks. J. Neurosci. 35, 8394–8410 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Etter, G. et al. Optogenetic gamma stimulation rescues memory impairments in an Alzheimer′s disease mouse model. Nat. Commun. 10, 5322 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Turnbull, A. et al. Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex supports context-dependent prioritisation of off-task thought. Nat. Commun. 10, 3816 (2019).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lansink, C. S. et al. Reward expectancy strengthens CA1 theta and beta band synchronization and hippocampal-ventral striatal coupling. J. Neurosci. 36, 10598–10610 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0117000), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1312302-3, 2018YFC0115400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81870844, 81671268 & 81701260), the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. Z191100010618004), Xinglin Scholar of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No. A1-U1820501040222), and Budgeted Research Project of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No.18LK002). We thank Dr. Xiaohui Zhang and Dr. Yousheng Shu from Beijing Normal University for gifts of transgenic mice and professional advices. We thank Dr. Minmin Luo from National Institute of Biological Sciences for guidance of fiber photometry recording. We also thank Dr. Zhantao Bai from Yanan University for scientific suggestions and experimental equipment. We thank the Biological and Medical Engineering Core Facilities of Beijing Institute of Technology for supporting experimental equipments.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Da Song, Deheng Wang, Qinghu Yang, Tianyi Yan.

Authors and Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China
Da Song, Qinghu Yang, Tianyi Yan, Yan Yan, Juan Zhao, Zhen Xie, Talal Jamil Qazi, Yanhui Li, Heao Zhang, Tao Huang, Chunjian Wang, Zhenzhen Quan & Hong Qing
School of Basic Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
Deheng Wang, Yuchen Liu & Zunji Ke
Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University; The National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Zhe Wang
Shandong Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis & Treatment and Behavioral Interventions of mental disorders & Shandong Key Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
Yili Wu
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China
Qing Shi & Yiran Lang

Authors

Da Song
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Deheng Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qinghu Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tianyi Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhe Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yan Yan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Juan Zhao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhen Xie
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuchen Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zunji Ke
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Talal Jamil Qazi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yanhui Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yili Wu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qing Shi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yiran Lang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Heao Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tao Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chunjian Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhenzhen Quan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hong Qing
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.S., ZZ.Q., and H.Q. conceived and designed the studies and wrote the papers. D.S., DH.W., and Z.W. performed optogenetics and single-unit recording. QH.Y., YR.L., and TY.Y. carried out fiber photometry recordings, CJ.W., T.H., T.J., and YL.W. carried out tDNMTP, wDMTP, and toDNMTL behavioral tests; J.Z., YC.L., and HA.Z. performed immunohistochemistry and cell counting. DH.W., ZJ.K., and D. S. performed rabies virus-mediated retrograde tracing experiments. Y.Y., YH.L., Q.S., and Z.X. performed injections and imaging. All authors contributed to the data analysis and presentation in the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenzhen Quan or Hong Qing.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Juan Marcos Alarcon, Michael Kohl, and other anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, D., Wang, D., Yang, Q. et al. The lateralization of left hippocampal CA3 during the retrieval of spatial working memory. Nat Commun 11, 2901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16698-4

Download citation

Received: 16 September 2019
Accepted: 19 May 2020
Published: 09 June 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16698-4

This article is cited by

Reduced gray matter volume of the hippocampal tail in melancholic depression: evidence from an MRI study
- Zhaosong Chu
- Lijin Yuan
- Zonglin Shen
BMC Psychiatry (2024)
CircAKT3 alleviates postoperative cognitive dysfunction by stabilizing the feedback cycle of miR-106a-5p/HDAC4/MEF2C axis in hippocampi of aged mice
- Xuan Wang
- Xiaole Tang
- Ailin Luo
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2024)
ACx-projecting cholinergic neurons in the NB influence the BLA ensembles to modulate the discrimination of auditory fear memory
- Yan Yan
- Da Song
- Zhenzhen Quan
Translational Psychiatry (2023)
Regional and interhemispheric differences of neuronal representations in dentate gyrus and CA3 inferred from expression of zif268
- Lars-Patrick Schmill
- Katharina Bohle
- Peer Wulff
Scientific Reports (2023)
Liraglutide Alleviates Cognitive Deficit in db/db Mice: Involvement in Oxidative Stress, Iron Overload, and Ferroptosis
- Ji-Ren An
- Jia-Nan Su
- Yan Shi
Neurochemical Research (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Subjects

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Results

Hippocampal CA3 neural activity is lateralized during SWM

The bilateral CA3 neural dynamics are defined in tDNMTP task

Inhibition of LCA3 neurons impairs the retrieval of SWM

MSPV-LCA3 projection dominates the lateralization in SWM

The lateralization of MSPV-CA3 neurons is SWM task dependent

Discussion

Methods

Approvals

Subjects

Viruses

Stereotaxic injections

Immunohistochemistry

Fiber photometry recording

In vivo single-unit recording

Single-unit recording analysis

MSPV-CA3 and MSChat-CA3 recording

T-maze for delayed no-match-to-place (tDNMTP) task

Touchscreen for delayed no-match-to-location (toDNMTL)task

Water maze for delayed match-to-place (wDMTP) task

Behavioral tests coupled with optogenetic Manipulation

Statistical analysis and reproducibility

Reporting summary

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Comments

Search

Quick links

MS^PV-LCA3 projection dominates the lateralization in SWM

The lateralization of MS^PV-CA3 neurons is SWM task dependent

MS^PV-CA3 and MS^Chat-CA3 recording