Light-powered Escherichia coli cell division for chemical production

Ding, Qiang; Ma, Danlei; Liu, Gao-Qiang; Li, Yang; Guo, Liang; Gao, Cong; Hu, Guipeng; Ye, Chao; Liu, Jia; Liu, Liming; Chen, Xiulai

doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16154-3

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 08 May 2020

Light-powered Escherichia coli cell division for chemical production

Qiang Ding^1,2,
Danlei Ma^1,2,
Gao-Qiang Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-1752³,
Yang Li^1,2,
Liang Guo^1,2,
Cong Gao^1,2,
Guipeng Hu^1,2,
Chao Ye^1,2,
Jia Liu^1,2,
Liming Liu^1,2,4 &
…
Xiulai Chen ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-4558^1,2

Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 2262 (2020) Cite this article

11k Accesses
48 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Metabolic engineering

An Author Correction to this article was published on 04 November 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Cell division can perturb the metabolic performance of industrial microbes. The C period of cell division starts from the initiation to the termination of DNA replication, whereas the D period is the bacterial division process. Here, we first shorten the C and D periods of E. coli by controlling the expression of the ribonucleotide reductase NrdAB and division proteins FtsZA through blue light and near-infrared light activation, respectively. It increases the specific surface area to 3.7 μm⁻¹ and acetoin titer to 67.2 g·L⁻¹. Next, we prolong the C and D periods of E. coli by regulating the expression of the ribonucleotide reductase NrdA and division protein inhibitor SulA through blue light activation-repression and near-infrared (NIR) light activation, respectively. It improves the cell volume to 52.6 μm³ and poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) titer to 14.31 g·L⁻¹. Thus, the optogenetic-based cell division regulation strategy can improve the efficiency of microbial cell factories.

Light-driven CO2 sequestration in Escherichia coli to achieve theoretical yield of chemicals

Article 29 April 2021

Guipeng Hu, Zehong Li, … Xiulai Chen

Biomimetic light dilution using side-emitting optical fiber for enhancing the productivity of microalgae reactors

Article Open access 03 July 2019

Lothar Wondraczek, Alexander Gründler, … Stefan Nolte

Inducible asymmetric cell division and cell differentiation in a bacterium

Article 12 August 2019

Nikolai V. Mushnikov, Anastasia Fomicheva, … Grant R. Bowman

Introduction

Microbial cell factories offer an economic and environmentally friendly method for producing valuable chemicals, including biofuels, fine chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, from renewable feedstock^1,2. To maximize the efficiency of microbial cell factories, a series of strategies have been developed, including traditional breeding³, adaptive evolution⁴, synthetic biology^5,6, and metabolic engineering^4,7. Among these strategies, metabolic engineering has proven to be the most efficient and feasible way in improving the performance of industrial microbes^4,8,9. Recently, DCEO biotechnology¹⁰ is proposed for engineering industrial microbes, and mainly involves in four technical steps: pathway design, pathway construction, pathway evaluation, and pathway optimization. Based on this, metabolic engineering strategies can be adopted to engineer microbial cell factories for chemical production at DNA level (promoter engineering¹¹), RNA level (transcription factor engineering and synthetic RNA switches¹²), protein level (protein engineering and cofactor engineering⁵), and cell level (morphology engineering¹³ and consortia engineering¹⁴). In these strategies, cell morphology can affect the efficiency of microbial cell factories at cell level by changing cell density¹⁵, mass transfer¹⁶, cell size^13,16, and cell lysis^17,18.

Cell morphology can be generally affected by culture conditions¹⁹, nutrient components²⁰, cell division²¹, and cell metabolism^22,23,24. Previous studies on regulating cell morphology are mainly divided into three aspects: (1) Nutritional regulation: carbon sources, nitrogen sources, and metal ions can be used to regulate cell growth and biomass density by supplying essential components¹⁵; (2) Mechanical regulation: micro-particle cultivation and fermenter pressure play important roles in changing the culture rheology and oxygen transfer rate by affecting nutrient assimilation and mass transfer^15,19; and (3) Skeleton protein regulation: skeleton proteins can alter cell width and cell lysis by perturbing cell membrane synthesis²⁵. On the other hand, bacteria can tightly coordinate various events during cell cycle to control their cell morphology^26,27. There are two key stages in the bacterial cell cycle: the C period starts from the initiation to the termination of DNA replication, and the D period is the bacterial division process²¹. The C and D periods of cell division can affect cell morphology by perturbing dNTP synthesis or the assembly of Escherichia coli divisomes^21,28. As a result, cell growth or cell volume is efficiently improved for chemical production^13,29,30. Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of the division-related proteins—FtsZ, FtsQ, FtsA, and FtsN—or ribonucleotide reductases—NrdA, NrdB, and NrdD—can shorten the C and D periods. In addition, weak expression of NrdA, NrdB, and NrdD or overexpression of the division protein inhibitors of SulA, MinC, MinD, MinE, and FtsH can prolong the C and D periods^30,31,32 (Supplementary Note 1). Thus, how to change the cell morphology by regulating the C and D periods is interesting for chemical production. Optogenetics is an efficient strategy for regulating cell phenotypes to enhance the chemical production at multiple levels in a noninvasive, reversible, and spatiotemporal manner. For example, blue light-mediated optogenetics, far-red light-regulated CRISPR technology, and light-based metabolic flux regulation have been used for isobutanol production³³, live cell therapy³⁴, and deoxyviolacein biosynthesis³⁵, respectively. These studies indicate that the optogenetics-based cell division may be a promising strategy for improving the efficiency of chemical production.

In this study, we show that the C and D periods of cell division can be shortened or prolonged through optogenetic regulation. The specific surface area (SSA) of E. coli is engineered to drive acetoin production by shortening the C and D period with a blue light activation and near-infrared (NIR) light activation system (BANA). The cell volume of E. coli is engineered to increase poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) production by prolonging the C and D periods with a blue light activation–repression and NIR light activation system (BARNA). The optogenetics-based cell division strategy can increase chemical production via microbial cell factories.

Results

Screening cell division genes

The 14 genes involved in the C and D periods of cell division were divided into two distinct groups. The first group included nine overexpressed genes (nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, nrdD, ftsZA, ftsZ, ftsA, ftsQ, and ftsN), which can stimulate dNTP synthesis and E. coli divisome assembly²¹. Genes in the second group included the weakly expressed nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, and nrdD and overexpressed sulA, minC, minD, minE, and ftsH. These genes can perturb dNTP synthesis and Z-ring assembly^36,37, thus are involved in prolonging cell division.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, independent overexpression of nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, nrdD, ftsZA, ftsZ, ftsA, ftsQ, and ftsN in E. coli JM109 shortened cell division (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). As a result, the periods of cell division, mean cell length (MCL), mean surface area, and mean cell volume (MCV) were decreased. The SSA, cell count (c.f.u), cell growth (OD₆₀₀), and dry cell weight (DCW) were increased. In addition, the mean cell width (MCW) was not changed (Fig. 1e, f, Supplementary Figs. 1A, B and 4A). However, when nrdAB (or ftsZA) was overexpressed, an obvious difference was observed in cell morphology. Compared with the control strain, the periods of cell division, mean surface area, MCV of the engineered strains overexpressing nrdAB (or ftsZA) were decreased by 39.73% (or 43.75%), 31.66% (or 41.53%), and 40.35% (or 52.94%), respectively (Fig. 1a–d, Supplementary Fig. 3A). In addition, the SSA, c.f.u, OD₆₀₀, and DCW were increased by 14.69% (or 24.25%), 15.73% (or 25.84%), 38.98% (or 37.29%), and 38.98% (or 37.29%), respectively (Fig. 1c, d, Supplementary Figs. 5A and 7A). These results indicated that overexpressing nrdAB and ftsZA could efficiently shorten the C and D periods of cell division, respectively.

**Fig. 1: Shortening the C and D periods of cell division by genetic manipulation.**

As showed in Fig. 2, the independent weak expression of nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, and nrdD in the corresponding E. coli JM109 mutant strains and the independent overexpression of sulA, minC, minD, minE, and ftsH in E. coli JM109 could prolong cell division (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). As a result, the periods of cell division, the MCL, mean surface area, and MCV were increased. The SSA, c.f.u, OD₆₀₀, and DCW were decreased. In addition, those genes expression did not change MCW (Fig. 2e, f, Supplementary Figs. 2A, B, 4B). Among these strains, an obvious difference was showed in cell morphology by weak expression of nrdA and overexpression of sulA. Compared with the control strain, the periods of cell division, mean surface area, MCV of the engineered strains with weak expression of nrdA (or overexpression of sulA) were increased by 124.6% (or 271.8%), 281.21% (or 776.87%), and 384.57% (or 960.62%), respectively (Fig. 2a–d, Supplementary Fig. 3B). In addition, the SSA, c.f.u, OD₆₀₀, and DCW were decreased by 21.41% (or 17.74%), 11.55% (or 31.05%), 4.65% (or 5.81%), and 4.65% (or 5.81%), respectively (Fig. 2c, d, Supplementary Fig. 6A, 7B). Compared with E. coli JM109 with weak expression of nrdA, nrdAB, nrdB, and nrdD, the C period of E. coli JM109 with deletion of nrdA, nrdAB, nrdB, and nrdD was increased by 102.77%, 51.58%, 59.28%, and 18.53%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3C, and Supplementary Note 2). These results suggested that weak expression of nrdA and overexpression of sulA could efficiently prolong the C and D periods of cell division, respectively.

**Fig. 2: Prolonging the C and D periods of cell division by genetic manipulation.**

Finally, we investigated the effect of nrdAB and ftsZA overexpression on shortening cell division and the effect of weak nrdA expression and sulA overexpression on prolonging cell division. As shown in Fig. 3a, b, the simultaneous overexpression of nrdAB and ftsZA increased the SSA to 4.12 μm⁻¹, and the weak expression of nrdA and overexpression of sulA increased the MCV to 56.2 μm³. However, the coexpression of nrdAB + ftsZAQ and nrdAB + ftsZAQN did not shorten the C and D periods or increase the SSA, c.f.u, or OD₆₀₀ (Supplementary Fig. 8A, B, 9A). Thus, the nrdAB + ftsZA and nrdA + sulA groups were chosen to shorten or prolong the C and D periods of cell division, respectively (Fig. 3c–f).

**Fig. 3: Combination of the C and D periods of cell division.**

Constructing the basic tools for powering cell division

To achieve spatial, temporal, and reversible control of E. coli SSA and MCV, three basic optogenetics-based cell division regulation tools, a blue-light activation tool (BLAT), a blue-light repression tool (BLRT), and an NIR-light activation tool (NRAT), were designed and constructed (Supplementary Fig. 13).

The construction of BLAT and BLRT follows a previously reported strategy³⁸. To construct a BLAT, two units were designed and assembled (Fig. 4a): a blue optogenetics unit (BOU) to express light-sensitive protein EL222, and an activation reporter unit to replace the LuxR-binding region with an EL222-binding region by overlaping the −35 region (E. coli consensus −35 and −10 regions) of the LuxI promoter³⁸. In this BLAT, EL222 can bind to the blue-light-inducible promoter following illumination with blue light, and then induce gene expression by recruiting RNA polymerase. To construct a BLRT, the modified J23119 promoter was converted into a transcriptional repressor by positioning the J23119 box between and partially overlapping the consensus −35 and −10 regions of the constitutive promoter³⁸, resulting in an repression reporter unit (Fig. 4b), which was then combined with the blue optogenetics unit (BOU). To construct an NRAT, two units were designed and assembled: a near-infrared light unit to constitutively express the bphS, bphO, yhjH, mrkH genes, and a near-infrared activation unit with the P_mrkA promoter (Fig. 4C). In this NRAT, GTP is converted into c-di-GMP by utilizing the BphS and BphO proteins, and then c-di-GMP can be degraded by the YhjH protein. Finally, the MrkH protein can bind c-di-GMP to activate the MrkH-dependent P_mrkA promoter³⁹.

**Fig. 4: The performance of three basic optogenetics tools.**

The performances of BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT were evaluated. The abundance of mKate (BLAT) and BFP (NRAT) was increased by 9.3-fold and 10.5-fold with illumination of 0.8 W/cm² blue light (Fig. 4d) and 0.8 W/cm² NIR light (Fig. 4f), respectively, but the GFP abundance (BLRT) was decreased by 15.2-fold with illumination with 0.8 W/cm² blue light (Fig. 4e) compared to the corresponding abundance of the dark condition. The genes of interest (GOIs) of BLAT and NRAT showed an increased abundance, but the abundance of the BLRT GOIs decreased with the increasing illumination time (0–14 h), intensity (0–0.8 W/cm²), and pulse (0–100%) (Supplementary Figs. 14A–C, 17A–C, and 20A–C). Then, the bioimaging in Fig. 4g–i for red, green, blue, and panda with a setup were used to display the spatial specificity of BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT. For the temporal specificity of BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT, the reversible transcription activation in β-galactosidase or β-glucuronidase was presented by an ON-OFF-ON or OFF-ON-OFF switch under BLAT, BLRT, or NRAT control, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 15A, B, 18A, B, and 20D).

To further obtain a powerful light-inducible tool, we optimized BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT, respectively. In BLAT, the EL222-binding site length and EL222 expression level were modified to control the mKate abundance, and thus the results showed a 23.5-fold activation in mKate abundance (Supplementary Fig. 16A–C). In BLRT, a promoter library of the −35 and −10 hexamers was constructed and screened to tune the dynamic range of the bacterial promoters, and thus the results revealed a 53-fold repression in GFP expression of aB (TTGACA/GATAAT) group (Supplementary Fig. 19A, B). In NRAT, the RBS strength of yhjH was optimized to regulate the c-di-GMP levels, and thus the results showed a 28.6-fold increase in BFP abundance (Supplementary Fig. 21A). Additionally, these three optogenetic tools were noninvasive for cell growth under blue or NIR light (Supplementary Fig. 22A–C).

The optogenetic tools could efficiently regulate endogenous bacterial genes. BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT were introduced into E. coli JM109 to replace the fluorescent proteins and spatiotemporally control cell division. Compared to the control strain, when BLAT was used to shorten the C+D periods of cell division, the SSA was increased by 1.26-fold (Supplementary Fig. 23A). In addition, when BLAT was used to prolong the C and D periods of cell division, the MCV was increased by 3.68-fold and 10.36-fold, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 23A). Similarly, when BLRT and NRAT were introduced into E. coli JM109, the C and D periods of cell division were increased and decreased, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 23B, C). To further confirm the universal properties of these optogenetic tools, BLAT, BLRT, and NRAT were introduced into lactate-producing strain E. coli GL0002⁴⁰ and pyruvate-producing strain E. coli F0601⁴⁰, the similar changes in the C and D period of cell division were also detected, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 24A). Together, these results demonstrated that the optogenetic tools exhibited good applicability for the regulation of cell division.

Enhancing acetoin production by shortening cell division

Acetoin, a food flavoring and fragrance, is widely used in the food, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries⁴¹. An engineered E. coli D1 strain was constructed by constitutively overexpressing budA, budB, and nox genes in the biosynthetic pathway of acetoin. Based on this, the engineered strain produced 13.5 g L⁻¹ acetoin (Fig. 5A, D, Supplementary Data 1 and 2).

**Fig. 5: Shortening cell division for acetoin production by the BANA system.**

Then, the state of cell division and robustness of engineered E. coli D1 were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5D and Supplementary Fig. 28B, it was found that the C+D period of cell division (E. coli D1) was prolonged by 33.09% compared to E. coli F0601. As a result, the SSA and relative cell viability of E. coli D1 were decreased by 6.89% and 50.5%, respectively. These results demonstrated that prolonging the C+D period of cell division decreased SSA, and then disturbed cell viability, thus leading to the cessation of cell growth and potentially affecting acetoin production. To enhance cell growth and improve strain robustness, the process of acetoin fermentation was divided into three phases by introducing the optogenetic strategies to shorten cell division: (1) shortening phase to shorten cell division and increase the SSA by high-level expression of nrdAB + ftsZA; (2) cooperating phase to balance cell growth and acetoin production by expressing nrdAB + ftsZA at a moderate level and stimulating the expression of the rpoS⁴²; and (3) defensing phase to improve strain robustness by expressing nrdAB + ftsZA at a moderate level and rpoS at a high level (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 25A, B, Supplementary Note 3, and Supplementary Data 4).

To spatiotemporally tune these three phases, a blue-light activation and NIR-light activation system (BANA) was constructed by combining BLAT and NRAT (Fig. 5b). Then, we confirmed the similar functions of dose-dependent and spatiotemporal specificity of BANA by implementing the illumination intensity, pulse, bioimaging, and GOIs abundance experiments, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 26A–C). Further, BANA was introduced into E. coli D1 to increase acetoin production by spatiotemporally regulating the expression of nrdAB, ftsZA, and rpoS. Based on this, the aforementioned three phases were achieved by manipulating the intensity and time of blue-light and NIR-light illumination, respectively (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 27A–C). This manipulation led to the formation of E. coli DN4. As a result, the C+D period of E. coli DN4 was shortened by 35.56% compared to E. coli D1, whereas the SSA, relative cell viability and half-maximal inhibitory concentration were increased by 20.39%, 62.18%, and 46.23%, respectively (Fig. 5d, f, Supplementary Fig. 28A, B). These results led to a 131.1% increase in the titer and productivity of acetoin in E. coli DN4 compared to those of E. coli D1, respectively (Fig. 5d). When this culture was scaled up to a 5-L fermenter, the acetoin titer, productivity, and OD₆₀₀ of E. coli DN4 under light conditions were increased to 67.2 g L⁻¹, 0.93 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹, and 64.97, respectively, which were 39.19, 39.19, and 16.43% higher than that of E. coli D1, 15.17, 15.17, and 6.02% higher than that of E. coli D3, 41.5, 41.5, and 23.78% higher than that of E. coli DN4 under the dark condition, respectively (Fig. 5e, Table 1). Furthermore, based on the fluorescence intensity and fluorescence density percentage under 5 and 10 L fermenters, a similar fluorescence expression in 250 mL shake flasks was activated. These results indicated the fine applicability of scale and high-density fermentation (Supplementary Figs. 31–33, and Supplementary Note 4).

Table 1 Differences in wild type and morphology engineered E. coli on production of acetoin in 5 L fermenter.

Full size table

Increasing poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) (PLH) production by prolonging cell division

PLH is a biodegradable and biocompatible synthetic polymer that accumulates as inclusion bodies in microorganisms⁴³. We engineered E. coli DQ0, in which the phaA, phaB, phaC, and pct genes involved in the PLH pathway were constitutively overexpressed. Analytical result showed that its PLH content was at 11.5 wt% level (Fig. 6a, d, Supplementary Data 1 and 2). Then, the state of cell division were analyzed (Supplementary Fig. 34A, B). We found that the C+D period of cell division (E. coli DQ0) was prolonged by 17.95% (Fig. 6d). As a result, the MCV was increased by 9.38%, but c.f.u of E. coli DQ0 was decreased by 8.9% compared to that of E. coli GL0002 (Fig. 6d, Supplementary Fig. 39A, C). These results indicated that PLH production was limited by the MCV and cell counts. To solve these limitations in PLH fermentation, the process of PLH biosynthesis was divided into three phases by introducing the optogenetic strategies to prolong cell division: (1) shortening cell division to increase the cell count by the expression of nrdAB, ftsZA, and nrdA; (2) switching time phase to increase the PLH content by optimizing the switch time from dark to blue light; and (3) prolonging cell division to increase the MCV by stimulating the expression of sulA and decreasing the expression of nrdA (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. 34A, B).

**Fig. 6: Prolonging cell division for PLH production by the BARNA system.**

To spatiotemporally regulate these three phases, a blue light activation-repression and NIR light activation system (BARNA) was constructed by combining BANA and BLRT (Fig. 6b). Then, we confirmed the similar functions of dose-dependent and spatiotemporal specificity of BARNA by conducting the illumination pulse, intensity, bio-imaging, and GOIs abundance experiments (Supplementary Fig. 35A, 36A, B). Furthermore, BARNA was introduced into E. coli DQ0 to enhance PLH production by spatiotemporally controlling the expression of nrdAB, ftsZA, nrdA, and sulA genes. Based on this, the aforementioned three phases were achieved by adjusting the illumination intensity and time (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. 37A, B, and Supplementary 38A, B). This manipulation led to the formation of E. coli DQ8. As a result, compared to E. coli DQ0, the C+D period of E. coli DQ8 was prolonged by 1.96-fold, whereas the cell wall thickness was decreased by 18.6% (Fig. 6D, F). In addition, the MCV and c.f.u were increased by 13.65-fold and 1.16-fold, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 39A, C). These results led to the PLH content, DCW, and PLH titer increased to 38.5 wt%, 7.41 g L⁻¹, and 2.85 g L⁻¹, respectively, which was 234.78, 36.96, 359.68% higher than that of E. coli DQ0 (Fig. 6d, f, Supplementary Fig. 39B). After that, the switch time in the dark was optimized before starting fermentation, and the PLH content was increased to 47.5 wt% (Supplementary Fig. 39D). When this culture were scaled up to 5 L fermenter, the PLH titer, content, and DCW of E. coli DQ8 under the light condition were 14.31 g L⁻¹, 53.8 wt%, and 26.6 g L⁻¹, which were 137.71, 100.97, and 18.33% higher than that of E. coli DQ0, 34.87, 22.66, and 9.96% higher than that of E. coli DQ280, 114.22, 86.87, and 14.61% higher than that of E. coli DQ8 under the dark condition, respectively (Fig. 6e, Table 2).

Table 2 Differences in wild type and engineered E. coli on PLH production in 5 L fermenter.

Full size table

Discussion

In this study, the BANA and BARNA light-powered systems were constructed and employed to spatiotemporally regulate the cell division of E. coli. When the BANA light-powered system was used to shorten cell division of E. coli DN4, the SSA and acetoin titer of E. coli DN4 were increased to 3.7 μm⁻¹ and 67.2 g L⁻¹, which were 20.39 and 39.19% higher than these of E. coli D1, respectively. When the BARNA light-powered system was used to prolong the cell division of E. coli DQ8, the MCV, PLH content, DCW, and PLH titer of E. coli DQ8 were increased to 52.6 μm³, 53.8 wt%, 26.6 and 14.31 g L⁻¹, which were 13.65-fold, 2.01-fold, 1.18-fold, and 2.38-fold higher than these of E. coli DQ0, respectively. These results demonstrated that engineering the C and D periods of cell division represented an useful strategy to streamline the efficiency of microbial cell factories.

Cell division in Escherichia coli is mediated by a large protein complex and deoxyribonucleotides^31,37, which are regulated by two factors: (i) a positive regulator: the nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, and nrdD genes in the C period of cell division catalyze deoxyribonucleoside diphosphate for dNTP production to promote DNA replication for cell division, and then the ftsZA, ftsZ, ftsA, ftsN, and ftsQ genes in the D period of cell division assemble into a Z-ring scaffold to accelerate cell division; (ii) a negative regulator: the deletion of the nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, and nrdD genes in the C period of cell division can perturb dNTP synthesis, and then the sulA, minC, minD, minE, and ftsH genes in the D period of cell division are the inhibitors of cell division. To regulate cell division at multiple levels, optogenetics is a promising strategy in a noninvasive, reversible, and spatiotemporal way³³. For example, a blue light feedback gene circuit was used to reversibly regulate pyruvate decarboxylation to decouple cell growth and chemical production, resulting in isobutanol and 2-methyl-1-butanol production up to 8.49 g L⁻¹ and 2.38 g L⁻¹, respectively³³. In addition, red light and blue light were utilized to regulate the Bphs and BlrP1 proteins for biofilm formation⁴⁴. Based on these studies, an optogenetics-based cell division strategy was proposed: the optogenetic strategy was used to shorten or prolong the C+D period of cell division by spatiotemporally controlling the genes involved in the C+D periods of cell division in different phases with various light illumination intensities and times. Thus, two different light-powered systems, BANA and BARNA, were constructed. A BARNA light-powered system was used for weak expression of nrdA and overexpression of nrdAB, ftsZA, and sulA in E. coli DQ8, and thus the C and D periods of cell division were prolonged. As a result, this system causes the mini-cell phenotype²⁹ and increases the cell count and cell growth^30,45. To hinder DNA replication and decrease cell division frequency, a BARNA light-powered system was used for weak expression of nrdA and overexpression of nrdAB, ftsZA, and sulA in E. coli DQ8, and thus the C and D periods of cell division was prolonged. Thus, this system causes a large-cell phenotype and decreases cell count and cell growth^13,46.

As a vital physiological parameter of industrial microbes^20,47, SSA could increase mass transfer by enhancing the nutrient uptake rate and cell growth and improve cell density by changing the rheology of cultures. During industrial fermentation, SSA can be affected by mechanical pressure, medium contents, and chemical stress¹⁶. Thus, many efforts have showed their application potential in regulating SSA, such as microparticle cultivation²⁰, fermentation optimization⁴⁸, and laboratory adaptive evolution engineering⁴⁹. Based on these strategies, the efficiency of chemical production will be enhanced by increasing the SSA of industrial microbes. In this study, when the C and D periods of cell division were shortened by BANA, the SSA was showed a 20.39% increase. As a result, the acetoin titer was increased by 39.19% compared to that of E. coli D1. These results indicated that acetoin production was improved by accurately controlling cell division and engineering SSA. This study was different from the previous studies that engineered target metabolic pathways⁴¹ and eliminated carbon catabolite repression⁵⁰.

The MCV of industrial microbes is an important physiological parameter⁵¹, where we want to maximize inclusion body production. In addition, MCV should be also considered to improve the efficiency of upstream and downstream bioprocessing through faster precipitation of cells with relatively higher gravity. To manipulate the MCV of industrial microbes, a series of strategies have been developed such as perturbing the peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis to obtain a more elastic and flexible cell structure²⁴, screening the cytoskeletal mutants for morphological properties²⁵, and disturbing the phosphatidylinositol biosynthesis in vivo for the formation of filamentous structures²³. In this study, when the C and D periods of cell division were prolonged by BARNA light-powered systems, the MCV of E. coli DQ8 was showed a 13.65-fold increase. As a result, the cell space for PLH accumulation was increased, and thus the PLH content of E. coli DQ8 was increased by 2.01-fold compared to that of E. coli DQ0. These results indicated the PLH production was improved by accurately regulating the C and D periods of cell division to increase the MCV of E. coli DQ8. Weak expression of nrdA could prolong the C period of cell division by disturbing intracellular dNTP synthesis and DNA replication, and overexpression of sulA could prolong the D period of cell division by hindering Z ring formation and divisome assembly⁴⁶. Thus, the frequency of cell division would be affected by prolonging cell division²⁹, leading to an increase in cell size. The larger cell space for PLH accumulation improved the PLH content, titer, and DCW. The strategy in this study was different from the previous strategies, such as engineering the target metabolic pathways⁵², utilizing the post translational metabolic switching⁵³, and controlling the cofactor ratio⁵⁴.

In this study, an optogenetics-based cell division strategy was developed, which is noninvasive and incorporates spatial, temporal and reversible control. The SSA and MCV of E. coli were increased by shorting or prolonging the C and D periods of cell division using a BANA or BRANA light-powered system, respectively. Based on this, the higher SSA or MCV values led to the higher efficiency of acetoin or PLH production. Our results demonstrated that increasing the SSA and MCV by manipulating cell division could enhance the targeted chemical production. Furthermore, this optogenetic-based cell division strategy may provide an approach to construct microbial cell factories for high-value chemical production.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

All plasmids and bacterial strains used in this study were listed in Supplementary Data 1 and 2. Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and plates were used for strain selection and propagation. Kanamycin (50 mg L⁻¹), ampicillin (100 mg L⁻¹), spectinomycin (30 mg L⁻¹), anhydrous tetracycline (200 ng mL⁻¹), IPTG (100–500 μM) was added appropriately according to different conditions. The key gene targets of cell division were screened using IPTG. For constructing E. coli DQ280, the nrdAB, ftsZA, and sulA were constitutively expressed by promoter P_J23119, and nrdA was expressed by weak promoter P_J23113 with weak RBS B0033. The expression of nrdAB, nrdA, nrdB, and nrdD in the corresponding gene deletion mutants were controlled by low concentration of IPTG (10 μM) and low copy plasmid. The effect of IPTG concentration on gene expression was added in Supplementary Note 5.

For acetoin production, seed cultures were used for fermentation by transferring fresh colonies to a 30 mL tube containing 5 mL LB medium. After culturing for 10 h at 37 °C and 200 rpm, this fermentation solution was inoculated into a 250 mL flask with 50 mL fermentation medium⁵⁵ (100 g L⁻¹ glucose, 15 g L⁻¹ tryptone, 15 g L⁻¹ yeast extract, 3 g L⁻¹ KH₂PO₄, and 3 g L⁻¹ K₂HPO₄, and 0.4 g L⁻¹ MgSO₄) with an initial optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of 0.1, and then 10 g L⁻¹ CaCO₃ was added as an acid neutralizing agent. For fed-batch cultures in a 5 L fermenter (Shanghai Baoxing Biological Engineering Equipment Co. LTD), seed cultures were used for fermentation by transferring fresh colonies to a 250 mL flask containing 50 mL LB medium. Acetoin fermentation was carried out in a 5 L fermenter containing 3 L fermentation medium with 5% inoculum size and 90 g L⁻¹ initial glucose, and then supplied with 800 g L⁻¹ glucose at 48 h. Acetoin fermentation was maintained at pH 6.0, rotate rate 400 rpm, air flow 0.5 vvm, and 35 °C by the automatic addition of 4 M NaOH or 2 M HCl.

For PLH production, seed cultures were used for fermentation by transferring fresh colonies to a 30 mL tube containing 5 mL LB medium. After culturing for 10 h at 37 °C and 200 rpm, this fermentation solution was inoculated into a 250 mL flask with 50 mL MR medium⁵⁶ (60 g L⁻¹ glucose, 6.75 g L⁻¹ KH₂PO₄, 2 g L⁻¹ (NH₄)₂HPO₄, 0.85 g L⁻¹ citric acid, 3 g L⁻¹ yeast extract, 10 mL trace metal solution per liter; pH 6.8), with an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.1, and then 10 g L⁻¹ CaCO₃ was added as an acid neutralizing agent. The composition of the trace metal solution was 10 g L⁻¹ FeSO₄·7H₂O, 2.2 g L⁻¹ ZnSO₄·7H₂O, 0.58 g L⁻¹ MnSO₄·4H₂O, 1 g L⁻¹ CuSO₄·5H₂O, 0.1 g L⁻¹ (NH₄)₆Mo₇O₂₄·4H₂O, 0.2 g L⁻¹ Na₂B₄O₇·10H₂O and 10 mL of 35% HCl per liter. For fed-batch cultures in a 5 L fermenter (Shanghai Baoxing Biological Engineering Equipment Co. LTD), seed cultures were used for fermentation by transferring fresh colonies to a 250 mL flask containing 50 mL LB medium. PLH fermentation was carried out in a 5 L fermenter containing 3 L fermentation medium with 5% inoculum size and 60 g L⁻¹ initial glucose, and then supplied with 800 g L⁻¹ glucose at 36 h. PLH fermentation was maintained at pH 6.5, rotate rate 500 rpm, air flow 1 vvm and 37 °C by the automatic addition of 4 M NaOH or 2 M HCl. Cell density was measured at 600 nm by a spectrophotometer.

Optogenetics working conditions

For optogenetics LED illustration, cells were illuminated using a custom built 300 mm × 300 mm × 50 mm LED blue light and NIR light panels with adjustable ON/OFF pulsing and intensity. Two 450 nm blue light or two 650 nm NIR light (The characteristic of LED panel is 22 W, 24 V, 1.7 A; MODEL: HF-FX160, square light source) were opened to illuminate fermenter for activating gene expression. Light panel was placed 5 cm away from the vessel walls. These equipments were purchased from KOMA Vision Technology Company and LEMONS Co., Ltd, CHINA. Switching power supply AC/DC ADAPTER (MODEL: SPF-1210) was used to power the lighting apparatus simultaneously (AC 100–240 V ~50/60 Hz; OUTPUT: DC 12 V, 10 A). For improving the applicability and stability of scale, fermentation process was adopted a wrap-round illumination-type by two blue light and two NIR light illumination sources to surround 5 L and 10 L fermenters, respectively.

For optogenetics-controlled mKate and BFP expression in 5 L fermenter and 10 L fermenters (Labfors 5 Bacteria, INFORS, Switzerland), the culture pH, air flow, temperature were kept at 6.0, 1 vvm, and 37 °C, respectively. Samples were taken for every 12 h to measure OD₆₀₀ and DCW of cell cultures. The average measurements were measured with three independent fermentation and the error bars were corresponded to the standard deviations of those three measurements. To analyze the expression of fluorescence proteins, fermentation was carried out in a 10 L fermenter containing 7.5 L fermentation medium with 5% inoculum size, and then supplied with 100 g L⁻¹ yeast extract, 25 g L⁻¹ peptone, and 400 g L⁻¹ glycerol at a rate of 16 mL h⁻¹ for high density fermentation. When cells density was increased to an OD₆₀₀ of 10 in 5 L and 10 L fermenters, blue light or NIR light sources was opened to activate the expression of fluorescence proteins.

DNA manipulation and plasmid construction

Gene deletions were performed according to the Red homologous recombination method⁴⁰. All plasmids were constructed using basic molecular cloning techniques and Gibson assembly. To construct the acetoin biosynthesis pathway, the budA and budB genes were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of S. marcescens H30. Similarly, the nox gene from L. breris was synthesized by Suzhou Genewiz Biotechnology with codon optimization. For constructing the PLH biosynthesis pathway, the pct gene from M. elsdenii, phaA and phaB genes from R. eutropha, and phaC gene from Pseudomonas sp. were synthesized by Suzhou Genewiz Biotechnology with codon optimization. The el222, bphS, bphO, yhjH, mrkH genes were synthesized by Suzhou Genewiz Biotechnology with codon optimization. Supplementary Data 2 and 3, gives a list of the relevant parts, sequences, and sources. Primers used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table 1.

BANA and BARNA implementation

BANA and BARNA system were constructed. In short, the BANA and BARNA were implemented with a two-plasmid system, respectively. Supplementary Data 1–3 showed the names and sequences of BANA and BARNA. In BANA, two plasmids, P_Trc-E-P_J23119-SO-P_J23119-Y₃₀M, and pBLind-v1-P_mrkA-BFP, were used as input plasmids with various blue-light and NIR-light illumination. In BARNA, two plasmids, P_Trc-E-P_J23119-SO-P_J23119-Y₃₀M and pBLirnd-v1-P_mrkA-BFP, were used as input plasmids with various blue-light and NIR-light illumination.

To test BANA, a colony of BANA cells containing a controller plasmid P_Trc-E-P_J23119-SO-P_J23119-Y₃₀M and an actuator plasmid pBLind-v1-P_mrkA-BFP was inoculated into medium with the corresponding ampicillin and spectinomycin for overnight (12–14 h) at 37 °C. Then, seed cultures were inoculated in the refresh LB for 12–14 h under the different blue-light (450 nm) or NIR-light (650 nm) illumination. This experiment was repeated with a different starting colony for three biological replicate. All cultures were grown in 50 mL medium in 250 mL shake flasks at 200 rpm. Finally, fluorescence density was analyzed (see below). To test BARNA, its method was similar to that of BANA.

Analytical methods

The OD₆₀₀ was measured using a spectrophotometer. Glucose analysis was quantified by the biosensor SBA-90E biological sensor. Acetoin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using an Aminex HPX-87H column (7.8 × 300 mm; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at 60 °C with 0.05 mM sulfuric acid as the mobile phase. The injection volume was 20 μL, and the flow rate was 0.6 mL min⁻¹. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 r min⁻¹ for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and then cells were washed twice with 20 mL distilled water. Dry cell weight (DCW) was assayed after vacuum lyophilization. PLH contents were quantitatively analyzed by gas chromatography (GC-2014, SHIMADZU, Japan) after methanolysis of lyophilized cells in chloroform. Analytical P3HB and P(GA-LA) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich were used as analysis standards.

The parameters of E. coli morphology

The model of E. coli was showed in Supplementary Fig. 40, which was used to calculate the mean cell width and MCL. The mean cell width was calculated from cell midline to cell midline. The MCL was calculated from pole to pole. The parameters²⁵ of E. coli morphology were used to segment cells and to identify cell outlines from Nikon eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon corporation) image for 100 individuals cell. Specific surface area was calculated by dividing S (1) by V (2).

$$S = {\mathrm{2}}\pi R(L - {\mathrm{2}}R) + {\mathrm{4}}\pi R^{\mathrm{2}},$$

(1)

$$V = \pi R^{\mathrm{2}}(L - {\mathrm{2}}R) + {\mathrm{4}}/{\mathrm{3}}\pi R^{\mathrm{3}},$$

(2)

where R is the mean cell width and L is the MCL, V is cell volume, and S is surface area.

Assay of field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 1500 r min⁻¹ for 2 min, and then washed twice with phosphate buffer at pH 7.2. The supernatant was discarded, and then 200 μL 2.5% glutaraldehyde (pH = 7.2) was added for sample fixation at room temperature for 2–3 h. Subsequently, samples were re-washed twice as described above. Finally, samples were prepared by the FESEM or TEM (FEI Company, Quanta-200 and H-7650).

Assay of the C and D periods and qPCR measurements

Measurement of the D period was based on measuring the ori/ter ratio by qPCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as described in Liu et al.³⁶ Two milliliter bacteria culture (OD₆₀₀~0.4) was collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen before sending to freezer for storage. After 24 h, the bacteria genome was extracted using a bacteria total genome DNA extraction kit. The DNA concentration was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm UV light with the NanoDrop ND-1000 UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Primers were used for amplifying the DNA region proximal to the origin (oriC) and terminus (ter)⁵⁷. The qPCR reactions were performed with a SuperReal Premix SYBR Green Plus kit according to its manual. For each PCR reaction, 20 μL sample contained 10 ng of DNA, 0.6 μM of each primer and 10 μL of 2× SYBR Green Supermix. The reaction process was carried out in an Opticon 2 Real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the following protocol: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The qPCR product was checked in a 2% agarose gel to ensure the specificity of PCR amplification. The 16S rRNA was used as the reference gene to normalize the expression level. For each RNA preparation, at least three independent real-time PCR measurements were performed. RT-PCR primers were listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Calculation of the C period is based on Zhu et al.⁴⁶ (Eqs. 3, 4). Briefly,

$${\mathrm{ori}}/{\mathrm{ter}} = 2^{({\mathrm{C}}/\tau )}$$

(3)

$$\tau = {\mathrm{ln2}}/\mu,$$

(4)

τ is the mass doubling time; μ is the specific growth rate.

The C period was measured by qPCR, a DNA increment method was applied. Chloramphenicol was used to inhibit the initiation of new rounds of replication, cells were collected by filtration, and the DNA amount was measured by the diphenylamine colorimetric method. The C period was calculated by measuring DNA amount after inhibiting the replication initiation. After DNA initiation blockage corresponded to origins (Ori)/genome equivalents for the cell populations, the relative DNA amount was changed. Genome equivalents/cell was calculated using DNA/cell to divide the molecular mass of E. coli chromosome. DNA/cell was calculated by measuring total DNA/OD and cell count/OD⁴⁶. Therefore, origins/cell was calculated by genome equivalents/cell times and the ori/genome equivalents ratio. The D period was further derived based on Eq. 5.

$${\mathrm{ori}}/{\mathrm{cell}} = 2^{({\mathrm{C}} + {\mathrm{D}})/{\uptau}},$$

(5)

Nile red staining

Cells (1 mL MR culture) were washed once with PBS, and then re-suspended in 1 mL PBS. Five microliter of Nile Red (0.1 mg mL⁻¹ in acetone) was added to cell suspension, and then incubated at room temperature, after culturing 5 min with dark condition. Cells were washed twice by 100% ethanol and 75% ethyl alcohol, respectively. Cells were imaged with a Nikon eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Corporation).

PI staining

The number of cells (about 10⁶ individual·mL⁻¹) was collected for PI staining. Then, it were centrifuged at 500–1000 r·min⁻¹ for 5 min to discard culture medium. Next, cells were washed with 3 mL PBS twice, and centrifuged. After centrifugation, PBS was discarded. Cells were dyed by 1 mL PI dying at 4 °C for 5–30 min under the dark condition. Cells were imaged with a Nikon eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon Corporation).

X-gal assay

The colorless compound X-gal (dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide) could be converted into galactose by β-galactosidase, forming the blue substance 5-bromo-4-indigo. In this study, the engineered E. coli was transformed into the plates containing 40 μg mL⁻¹ X-gal, and then cultured at 37 °C for 32 h in the dark or irradiated with blue-light (450 nm, 0.8 W/cm²). Based on this, the colony that produced β-galactosidase was turned into blue.

Creatine reaction assay

For creatine reaction assay, 10 mL reaction system included 10% NaOH, 5% beta-naphthol (dissolves in n-propanol), 0.5% creatine, and deionized water. The proportion of the reaction assay was 1:1:1:7. Hundred microliter of fermentation broth was added into reaction system to start reaction in test tube. This reaction was lasted for 30 min at 30 °C. The red reaction liquid was positive with acetoin titer, and could be used as a qualitative detection method for instructing acetoin titer.

Flow cytometry assays

For flow cytometry analysis, E. coli cells were washed twice with PBS, and then resuspended to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.2. The assays were performed by a LSR Fortessa instrument (BD Biosciences) using DAPI (BFP) and PE-TxRed (mKate) channels. The voltage gains for each detector were set to DAPI, 407 V and PE-TxRed, 650 V. Compensation was performed using cells that only expressed BFP or mKate. For each sample, at least 20,000 counts were recorded using a 0.5 mL s⁻¹ flow rate. A gate was previously designed based on forward and side scatter (>99% cells were chosen for the analysis of fluorescence density percentage). All data were exported in FCS3 format and processed using FlowJo software (FlowJo-V10).

The bioimage of agarose plates

E. coli strains harboring BLAT, BLRT, NRAT, BANA, and BARNA systems were cultured overnight, respectively³⁸. A photomask was placed on the bottom-side of the prepared agar plate and used aluminum oxide to avoid light illumination. Seed cultures were transferred to fresh medium for OD₆₀₀ = 0.8, and then 400 μL bacteria cultures was used to plate for bioimaging. The whole setup was kept inside the incubator at 37 °C. The LB plates were illuminated under 450 nm blue light or 650 nm NIR light or without illumination for 36 h. Fluorescence images were collected by IBright FL1000 (Thermo Fisher) and ChemiScope 6000 (Shanghai Qinxiang Scientific Instrument co. LTD).

Cell viability assays

The viability of cells in LB plates was assessed by inoculating cells in fermentation medium. Cells were diluted to OD₆₀₀ = 0.5 and 10 μL of 10× serially diluted cell suspension was spread on each agar plate with different strains. Then, the LB plates were cultured with 37 °C for 12 h. Next, the numbers of living cell in different culture time and different strains were calculated.

Enzymatic assays

β-galactosidase³⁹ gene was synthesized by GENEWIZ Biotechnology Co. LTD with codon optimization. ONPG (an analog of lactose) was used as substrates for assaying β-galactosidase activity. β-galactosidase could convert the colorless substrate oNPG into galactose and yellow-colored o-nitrophenol. o-Nitrophenol can be detected at 420 nm using a SpectraMax M3 plate reader. The diluted solution of β-galactosidase (0.1 mL) was added to 1.8 mL potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.5) containing 20 mM oNPG to start reaction. After incubation at 50 °C for 10 min, this reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL 1 M Na₂CO₃. All the extracellular activity represented the extracellular activity per ml medium supernatant. The method of β-glucuronidase assay was similar to β-galactosidase. 4-Nitrophenyl-β-d-glucuronide was converted to p-nitrophenol and β-gluconaldehyde glycoside by β-glucuronidase. For the enzymatic assay controlled by blue light or NIR light, culture temperature and rotation speed were set to 37 °C and 200 rpm, respectively. Culture medium was refreshed every 12 h to clean the residual β-galactosidase or β-glucuronidase for next assays.

Assay of fluorescence intensity

The engineered E. coli strains used for assaying fluorescence intensity were plated on the LB plates for overnight at 37 °C, 200 rpm. After that, it was inoculated into 50 mL fresh LB with 2% inoculum size (vol/vol), and then cultured at 37 °C, 200 rpm. For assaying fluorescence intensity, the fluorescence of cell culture was detected by a SpectraMax M3 plate reader (Molecular Devices). The excitation and emission wavelengths of BFP were set at 402 ± 10 nm and 457 ± 10 nm, respectively. The excitation and emission wavelengths of GFP were set at 480 ± 10 nm and 515 ± 10 nm, respectively. The excitation and emission wavelengths of mKate were set at 588 ± 10 nm and 645 ± 10 nm, respectively. The excitation and emission wavelengths of DAPI were set at 358 ± 10 nm and 461 ± 10 nm, respectively.

Statistical and reproducibility

All data were expressed as mean ± s.d. Differences between two groups were determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test and paired sample analysis through SPSS statistics software (SPSS V13.0). We have repeated each experiment at least three times of biological independent experiments.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this work are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The source data underlying Figs. 1, 2, 3a, b, 4d–i, 5d–f, 6D–F, Tables 1, 2, as well as Supplementary Figures 1–12, 14, 15, 16b, c, 17, 18, 19B, 20–24, 26–31, 35–39 are provided in Source Data file. All SEM, TEM, fluorescence, bio-imaging pictures, and enzyme reaction of micrographs are also available at figshare (https://figshare.com/search?q=10.6084%2Fm9.figshare.9122534&searchMode=1).

Change history

04 November 2020
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

Nielsen, J. & Keasling, J. D. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 164, 1185–1197 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Skjoedt, M. L. et al. Engineering prokaryotic transcriptional activators as metabolite biosensors in yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 951–961 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y. & Hyun, Uk,K. Systems strategies for developing industrial microbial strains. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1061–1072 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yu, T. et al. Reprogramming yeast metabolism from alcoholic fermentation to lipogenesis. Cell 174, 1549–1558 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Luo, X. Z. et al. Complete biosynthesis of cannabinoids and their unnatural analogues in yeast. Nature 567, 123–135 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, M. T., Bao, J., Hallstrom, B. M., Petranovic, D. & Nielsen, J. Efficient protein production by yeast requires global tuning of metabolism. Nat. Commun. 8, 1131–1143 (2017).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y. et al. A comprehensive metabolic map for production of bio-based chemicals. Nat. Catal. 2, 18–33 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. J. Expanding the terpenoid kingdom. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 1069–1070 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. J., Kerkhoven, E. J. & Nielsen, J. Barriers and opportunities in bio-based production of hydrocarbons. Nat. Energy 3, 925–935 (2018).
ADS CAS Google Scholar
Chen, X. L. et al. DCEO biotechnology: tools to design, construct, evaluate, and optimize the metabolic pathway for biosynthesis of chemicals. Chem. Rev. 118, 4–72 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, X. X. et al. Synthesis of chemicals by metabolic engineering of microbes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 3760–3785 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Delebecque, C. J., Lindner, A. B., Silver, P. A. & Aldaye, F. A. Organization of intracellular reactions with rationally designed RNA assemblies. Science 333, 470–474 (2011).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiang, X. R. & Chen., G. Q. Morphology engineering of bacteria for bio-production. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 435–440 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, H., Ding, M. Z., Jia, X. Q., Ma, Q. & Yuan, Y. J. Synthetic microbial consortia: from systematic analysis to construction and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6954–6981 (2014).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Timoumi, A., Guillouet, S. E., Molina-Jouve, C., Fillaudeau, L. & Gorret, N. Impacts of environmental conditions on product formation and morphology of Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 3831–3848 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kusumawardhani, H., Hosseini, R. & de Winde, J. H. Solvent tolerance in bacteria: fulfilling the promise of the biotech era? Trends Biotechnol. 36, 1025–1039 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Spencer, R. S. et al. A stabilized microbial ecosystem of self-limiting bacteria using synthetic quorum-regulated lysis. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Din, M. O. et al. Synchronized cycles of bacterial lysis for in vivo delivery. Nature 536, 81–85 (2016).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Basan, M. et al. Inflating bacterial cells by increased protein synthesis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 223–229 (2015).
Google Scholar
Driouch, H., Hansch, R., Wucherpfennig, T., Krull, R. & Wittmann, C. Improved enzyme production by bio-pellets of Aspergillus niger: targeted morphology engineering using titanate microparticles. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 462–471 (2012).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Du, S. & Lutkenhaus, J. Assembly and activation of the Escherichia coli divisome. Mol. Microbiol. 105, 177–187 (2017).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Budin, I. et al. Viscous control of cellular respiration by membrane lipid composition. Science 362, 1186–1189 (2018).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Botero, S., Chiaroni-Clarke, R. & Simon, S. M. Escherichia coli as a platform for the study of phosphoinositide biology. Sci. Adv. 5, 4872–4888 (2019).
ADS Google Scholar
Zhang, X. C. et al. Engineering cell wall synthesis mechanism for enhanced PHB accumulation in E. coli. Metab. Eng. 45, 32–46 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Shi, H. et al. Deep phenotypic mapping of bacterial cytoskeletal mutants reveals physiological robustness to cell size. Curr. Biol. 27, 3419–3429 (2017).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dewachter, L., Verstraeten, N., Fauvart, M. & Michiels, J. An integrative view of cell cycle control in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42, 116–136 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Willis, L. & Huang, K. C. Sizing up the bacterial cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 606–620 (2017).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kureisaite-Ciziene, D. et al. Structural analysis of the interaction between the bacterial cell division proteins ftsQ and ftsB. MBio 9, e01346–01318 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ward, J. E. & Lutken, J. Overproduction of FtsZ induces minicell formation in E. coli. Cell 42, 941–949 (1985).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jeong, K. J. & Lee, S. Y. Enhanced production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by filamentation suppression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1295–1298 (2003).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bisicchia, P., Arumugam, S., Schwille, P. & Sherratt, D. MinC, MinD, and MinE drive counter-oscillation of early-cell-division proteins prior to Escherichia coli septum formation. MBio 4, e00856–00813 (2013).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Auer, G. K. et al. Bacterial swarming reduces proteus mirabilis and Vibrio parahaemolyticus cell stiffness and increases beta-Lactam susceptibility. Mbio 10, e00210–e00219 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, E. M. et al. Optogenetic regulation of engineered cellular metabolism for microbial chemical production. Nature 555, 683–687 (2018).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shao, J. W. et al. Synthetic far-red light-mediated CRISPR-dCas9 device for inducing functional neuronal differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6722–E6730 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, E. M. et al. Light-based control of metabolic flux through assembly of synthetic organelles. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 589–597 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. Interrogating the Escherichia coli cell cycle by cell dimension perturbations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15000–15005 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Strahl, H., Burmann, F. & Hamoen, L. W. The actin homologue MreB organizes the bacterial cell membrane. Nat. Commun. 5, 25–36 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jayaraman, P. et al. Blue light-mediated transcriptional activation and repression of gene expression in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6994–7005 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ryu, M. H. & Gomelsky, M. Near-infrared light responsive synthetic c-di-GMP module for optogenetic applications. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 802–810 (2014).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guo, L. et al. Enhancement of malate production through engineering of the periplasmic rTCA pathway in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 115, 1571–1580 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mao, Y. F. et al. Systematic metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the industrial-level production of optically pure D-acetoin. Green. Chem. 19, 5691–5702 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Battesti, A., Majdalani, N. & Gottesman, S. The rpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 65, 189–213 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choi, S. Y. et al. One-step fermentative production of poly(lactate-co-glycolate) from carbohydrates in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 435–441 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Xia, A., Yang, G. & Jin, F. Bioprinting living biofilms through optogenetic manipulation. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1195–1200 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Lee, K. M. & Chan, H. N. Comparison of recombinant Escherichia coli strains for synthesis and morphological changes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 1337–1347 (1994).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, M. L. et al. Manipulating the bacterial cell cycle and cell size by titrating the expression of ribonucleotide reductase. Mbio 16, 38–51 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. L., Zhou, J., Ding, Q., Luo, Q. L. & Liu, L. M. Morphology engineering of Aspergillus oryzae for L-malate production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 116, 2662–2673 (2019).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liao, W., Liu, Y. & Chen, S. L. Studying pellet formation of a filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae to enhance organic acid production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 137, 689–701 (2007).
ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Choe, D. et al. Adaptive laboratory evolution of a genome-reduced Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–14 (2019).
ADS Google Scholar
Zhang, L. J. et al. Biotechnological production of acetoin, a bio-based platform chemical, from a lignocellulosic resource by metabolically engineered Enterobacter cloacae. Green. Chem. 18, 1560–1570 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Ling, C., Chen, Y., Jiang, X. & Chen, G. Q. Microbial engineering for easy downstream processing. Biotechnol. Adv. 15, 15–24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jung, Y. K., Kim, T. Y., Park, S. J. & Lee, S. Y. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of polylactic acid and its copolymers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105, 161–171 (2010).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Durante-Rodriguez, G., de Lorenzo, V. & Nikel, P. I. A post-translational metabolic switch enables complete decoupling of bacterial growth from biopolymer production in engineered Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 2686–2697 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ling, C. et al. Engineering NADH/NAD⁺ ratio in Halomonas bluephagenesis for enhanced production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Metab. Eng. 49, 275–286 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, S. H., Hou, Y. R., Chen, X. L. & Liu, L. M. Kick-starting evolution efficiency with an autonomous evolution mutation system. Metab. Eng. 54, 127–136 (2019).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, G. P. et al. Engineering synergetic CO₂-fixing pathways for malate production. Metab. Eng. 47, 496–504 (2018).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Waldminghaus, T., Weigel, C. & Skarstad, K. Replication fork movement and methylation govern SeqA binding to the Escherichia coli chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 5465–5476 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0904900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21978113), the Key Technologies R&D Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2017622), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP22031), and the National First-Class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering (LITE2018-08).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, 214122, Wuxi, China
Qiang Ding, Danlei Ma, Yang Li, Liang Guo, Cong Gao, Guipeng Hu, Chao Ye, Jia Liu, Liming Liu & Xiulai Chen
Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, 214122, Wuxi, China
Qiang Ding, Danlei Ma, Yang Li, Liang Guo, Cong Gao, Guipeng Hu, Chao Ye, Jia Liu, Liming Liu & Xiulai Chen
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Forestry Biotechnology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 410004, Changsha, China
Gao-Qiang Liu
National Engineering Laboratory for Cereal Fermentation Technology, Jiangnan University, 214122, Wuxi, China
Liming Liu

Authors

Qiang Ding
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Danlei Ma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gao-Qiang Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yang Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Liang Guo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cong Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guipeng Hu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chao Ye
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jia Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Liming Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiulai Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.D., X.L.C., and L.M.L. conceived this project and designed the experiments. Q.D. and Y.L. constructed the strains and plasmids. Q.D. and D.L.M. performed the experiments that are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and Supplementary Figs. 1–20. Q.D. and Y.L. performed the experiments that are shown in Figs. 4–6 and Supplementary Figs. 21–39. J.L. Q.D., and Y.L. conducted and interpreted all fermentation experiments. L.G., C.G., C.Y., J.L. and G.P.H. provided technical assistance. X.L.C., L.M.L., and G.Q.L. provided overall project supervision. Q.D. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiulai Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Guo-Qiang Chen, Shang-Tian Yang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Full information regarding the change(s) made can be found in the correction for this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, Q., Ma, D., Liu, GQ. et al. Light-powered Escherichia coli cell division for chemical production. Nat Commun 11, 2262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16154-3

Download citation

Received: 14 September 2019
Accepted: 19 April 2020
Published: 08 May 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16154-3

This article is cited by

Advances in microbial engineering for the production of value-added products in a biorefinery
- Cong Gao
- Liang Guo
- Liming Liu
Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing (2023)
A micro-nano optogenetic system based on probiotics for in situ host metabolism regulation
- Xinyu Zhang
- Ning Ma
- Hanjie Wang
Nano Research (2023)
Bifunctional optogenetic switch for improving shikimic acid production in E. coli
- Irene Komera
- Cong Gao
- Liming Liu
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts (2022)
Enhancing biofuels production by engineering the actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Hui Liu
- Pei Zhou
- Liming Liu
Nature Communications (2022)
Reversible thermal regulation for bifunctional dynamic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli
- Xuan Wang
- Jia-Ning Han
- Guo-Qiang Chen
Nature Communications (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.