Combined Rho-kinase inhibition and immunogenic cell death triggers and propagates immunity against cancer

Nam, Gi-Hoon; Lee, Eun Jung; Kim, Yoon Kyoung; Hong, Yeonsun; Choi, Yoonjeong; Ryu, Myung-Jeom; Woo, Jiwan; Cho, Yakdol; Ahn, Dong June; Yang, Yoosoo; Kwon, Ick-Chan; Park, Seung-Yoon; Kim, In-San

doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04607-9

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 04 June 2018

Combined Rho-kinase inhibition and immunogenic cell death triggers and propagates immunity against cancer

Gi-Hoon Nam^1,2^na1,
Eun Jung Lee^2,3^na1,
Yoon Kyoung Kim^1,2,
Yeonsun Hong^1,2,
Yoonjeong Choi^1,2,
Myung-Jeom Ryu^2,4,
Jiwan Woo⁵,
Yakdol Cho⁵,
Dong June Ahn¹,
Yoosoo Yang²,
Ick-Chan Kwon^1,2,
Seung-Yoon Park^2,6 &
…
In-San Kim^1,2

Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 2165 (2018) Cite this article

9378 Accesses
76 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Activation of T cell immune response is critical for the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Current immunotherapies have shown remarkable clinical success against several cancers; however, significant responses remain restricted to a minority of patients. Here, we show a therapeutic strategy that combines enhancing the phagocytic activity of antigen-presenting cells with immunogenic cell death to trigger efficient antitumour immunity. Rho-kinase (ROCK) blockade increases cancer cell phagocytosis and induces antitumour immunity through enhancement of T cell priming by dendritic cells (DCs), leading to suppression of tumour growth in syngeneic tumour models. Combining ROCK blockade with immunogenic chemotherapy leads to increased DC maturation and synergistic CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cell priming and infiltration into tumours. This therapeutic strategy effectively suppresses tumour growth and improves overall survival in a genetic mouse mammary tumour virus/Neu tumour model. Collectively, these results suggest that boosting intrinsic cancer immunity using immunogenic killing and enhanced phagocytosis is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

FOXO1 is a master regulator of memory programming in CAR T cells

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Alexander E. Doan, Katherine P. Mueller, … Evan W. Weber

FOXO1 enhances CAR T cell stemness, metabolic fitness and efficacy

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Jack D. Chan, Christina M. Scheffler, … Phillip K. Darcy

Personalized neoantigen vaccine and pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 1/2 trial

Article Open access 07 April 2024

Mark Yarchoan, Edward J. Gane, … Niranjan Y. Sardesai

Introduction

Reinforcement of intrinsic immune responses is an important factor that contributes to the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, an anticancer approach that is currently undergoing a revolution¹. Eliciting effective tumour antigen-specific immunity requires targeting the initial stages of the anticancer immunity cycle, including tumour antigen release, uptake and presentation and T cell priming. Several molecular targets have been singled out in efforts to modulate tumour cell phagocytosis. For example, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has been found to simulate phagocytosis of malignant B cells² and drive antitumour immune responses³. However, therapeutic strategies targeting cancer cells may have limited applications because their therapeutic efficacy is dependent on the expression of specific target molecules in cancer cells. Therefore, it may be necessary to potentiate the function of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) at the initial stages of the anticancer immunity cycle using strategies that target host immune cells.

The small GTPase RhoA and its downstream signalling effectors play important roles in the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton in many biological processes, including cell adhesion and migration^4,5. Rho-associated kinases (ROCKs), which are key downstream effectors of RhoA, have been implicated in tumour motility, invasion and growth⁶. Several studies have demonstrated therapeutic benefits of ROCK blockade on tumour cell migration and metastasis in a variety of tumour models^7,8,9,10. RhoA/ROCK signalling has also been implicated in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling and tissue stiffness, which are associated with tumour aggressiveness^11,12. A recent study has shown that antitumour effect of ROCK blockade is linked to FasL overexpression and T cell-mediated immune response¹³. In addition, RhoA/ROCK signalling was found to negatively regulate the engulfment of apoptotic cells^14,15. Accordingly, blockade of the RhoA/ROCK pathway using a ROCK inhibitor increases the phagocytic capacity of macrophages and enhances their clearance of apoptotic cells^14,16. These observations suggest the possibility that ROCK blockade promotes tumour cell phagocytosis by APCs, thereby leading to processing of cancer-specific antigens and activation of T cell immunity against cancer.

Tumour cells are antigenic, reflecting the abundance of somatic mutations in their genome; however, their immunogenicity in terms of eliciting cytotoxic T cell responses is relatively low because processes involved in host immunity activation, such as antigen presentation, take place in an immunosuppressive tumour environment¹⁷. Depending on the initiating stimulus, cancer cell death can be immunogenic or non-immunogenic¹⁸. Some chemotherapeutics, such as doxorubicin (Dox), mitoxantrone and oxaliplatin, have been reported to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) of cancer cells, leading to activation of antitumour immune responses^19,20,21. However, a previous study showed that the effect of ICD inducers is independent of adaptive immunity in some spontaneous mammary tumour models²², suggesting that ICD inducers may not be sufficient to induce effective antitumour immunity. These reports prompted us to hypothesize that immunogenic killing of tumour cells using an ICD inducer in conjunction with a phagocytosis enhancer might be a suitable combined antitumour immunotherapy for effectively 'awakening' intrinsic tumour immunity. Here, we show that ROCK blockade reduces tumour growth through increased cancer cell phagocytosis as well as T cell priming. Furthermore, the combination of an ICD inducer and ROCK blockade markedly induces effective antitumour immunity and suppresses tumour progression in syngeneic tumour models as well as a genetically engineered model.

Results

ROCK blockade enhances cancer cell clearance by phagocytes

As a first step in testing our combined treatment strategy, we investigated whether blockade of ROCK enhances engulfment of cancer cells by phagocytes. Macrophages and DCs were differentiated from bone marrow cells, as assessed by flow cytometry for F4/80 (macrophages) and CD11c (DCs) expression on the cell surface (Supplementary Fig. 1). Treatment of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) or bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) with the ROCK inhibitor, Y27632, led to a significant increase in the engulfment of CT26.CL25 colon cancer cells and B16F10-Ova melanoma cells (Fig. 1a, c). The percentages of phagocytosis were substantially increased in the Y27632-treated BMDMs (9.37 and 8.43) and BMDCs (9.99 and 10.09) as compared to the vehicle-treated BMDMs (3.76 and 3.1) and BMDCs (2.92 and 4.52), respectively (Fig. 1b, d). To definitely confirm engulfment of cancer cells, we labelled CT26.CL25 cells with the pH-sensitive dye, pHrodo-succinimidyl ester (pHrodo-SE), which emits red fluorescence in acidic phagosomes²³, and co-cultured with BMDMs or BMDCs. In agreement with the results from flow cytometry, ROCK blockade led to a substantial increase in red fluorescent cells engulfed by BMDMs and BMDCs (Fig. 1e–g). The phagocytosis-promoting effect of Y27632 was reversible, as assessed by phagocytosis assays after Y27632 washout (Supplementary Fig. 3). A previous study showed that the blockade of RhoA/ROCK signalling induces phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure on the cell surface²⁴, which acts as an 'eat me' signal for phagocytic clearance. Accordingly, we addressed the possibility that the surface exposure of PS induced by Y27632 increases the phagocytosis of cancer cells. A significant change in PS exposure by Y27632 was not observed in both cells even if cancer cells were treated with Y27632 for 24 h (Supplementary Fig. 2). To further determine whether the phagocytosis-promoting effect of Y27632 is attributable to modulation of the ability of BMDMs and BMDCs to phagocytose cancer cells, we treated phagocytes or cancer cells with Y27632 and performed phagocytosis assays. We found that treatment of phagocytes with Y27632 promoted cancer cell phagocytosis, whereas treatment of cancer cells with Y27632 had no effect on their engulfment (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. 4), suggesting that ROCK blockade augments phagocytosis by modulating phagocytes rather than by acting on tumour cells.

RhoA/ROCK pathway has been found to modulate the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC) by direct phosphorylation or by inhibiting MLC phosphatase, leading to actomyosin assembly and cell contraction^25,26. It is possible that decrease of contractility by ROCK blockade facilitates cell shape change for effective phagocytosis. We analysed the effect of inhibition of the motor protein myosin II on cancer cell phagocytosis. Treatment of BMDMs or BMDCs with the myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin, led to a significant increase in the engulfment of CT26.CL25 and B16F10-Ova cells (Fig. 1i, j and Supplementary Fig. 5), reminiscent of that observed for phagocytes treated with Y27632. These results suggest that cancer cell phagocytosis is modulated by RhoA/ROCK/myosin II pathway.

Phagocytes are crucial to antitumour effect of ROCK blockade

We next assessed the effects of Y27632 on tumour growth in two subcutaneous syngeneic tumour models: CT26.CL25 colon cancer and B16F10-Ova melanoma. Tumour cells were transplanted subcutaneously into the flank of 8-week-old male BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice. After tumours had reached a size of ~50–100 mm³, mice were intravenously (i.v.) administered Y27632 (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). Y27632 treatment substantially decreased tumour volume compared with vehicle treatment (Fig. 2a, b). When tumours were isolated and weighed at the end of the experiment, Y27632-treated mice had smaller tumour burthen than vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 2c). No substantial difference in body weight was observed between Y27632-treated and vehicle-treated groups (Supplementary Fig. 7). To determine if the antitumour activity associated with ROCK blockade was mediated by phagocytes, we generated a CT26.CL25 cell line expressing mCherry and treated CT26.CL25-mCherry tumour-bearing mice with clodronate liposomes (Supplementary Fig. 6c), which selectively induce the death of phagocytes²⁷. Injection of clodronate liposomes reduced the percentages of F4/80⁺ macrophages and CD11c⁺ DCs to 3.1% and 26%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 8), and robustly abrogated the antitumour response produced by systemic administration of Y27632 (Fig. 2d). To explore the effect of Y27632 on phagocytosis of cancer cells in vivo, we analysed the uptake of CL26.CL25-mCherry cells by macrophages and DCs in tumour tissues from CT26.CL25-mCherry tumour-bearing mice. Notably, the percentages of mCherry⁺ macrophages and DCs were approximately twofold higher in Y27632-treated mice than in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 2e, f), demonstrating the phagocytosis-promoting effect of ROCK blockade in vivo. In addition, we found that Y27632 increased the phagocytic activity in macrophages and DCs from mice that are not bearing tumour (Supplementary Fig. 9). To assess whether Y27632 promotes an immune response against tumour-associated antigens, we isolated tumour-draining lymph node (LN) cells from CT26.CL25-mCherry tumour-bearing mice, and analysed their immune response against β-galactosidase (β-gal), a model tumour-associated antigen in CT26.CL25 cells²⁸. Tumour-draining LN cells from Y27632-treated mice produced more interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in response to a β-gal peptide than those from vehicle-treated mice, an effect that was abrogated by phagocyte depletion (Fig. 2g). To assess whether cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells are responsible for IFN-γ production in the tumour-draining LN cells from Y27632-treated mice, we isolated CD8⁺ and CD8⁻ cells from the tumour-draining LN cells and analysed IFN-γ production against β-gal peptide. Notably, Y27632-mediated IFN-γ production was found in CD8⁺ cells (Fig. 2h). These results suggest that increased uptake of tumour antigen by ROCK blockade potentiates antitumour T cell immunity.

ROCK blockade induces antitumour immunity

To assess the role of T cell-mediated immunity in the antitumour activity of Y27632, we transplanted CT26.CL25 cells into syngeneic BALB/c nude mice and analysed the therapeutic effect of systemic Y27632 treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Y27632 treatment had a modest tumour-suppressing effect in nude mice (Fig. 3a), suggesting the importance of T cell immunity in Y27632-mediated antitumour effects. We then analysed the effects of Y27632 on tumour growth in the CT26.CL25 tumour model in which CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells were depleted by intraperitoneal injection of a neutralizing antibody (Supplementary Figs. 6e and 10). Depletion of CD8⁺ T cells impaired the antitumour activity of Y27632, as evidenced by the more rapid progression of tumours, whereas CD4⁺ T cell depletion had no effect (Fig. 3b, c). These results indicate that CD8⁺ T cells are required for Y27632-mediated tumour regression. To determine whether Y27632 provided protective immune memory, we re-challenged mice in which the primary tumour was surgically removed after Y27632 treatment by injecting a higher number of tumour cells in the contralateral flank (Supplementary Fig. 6f). The percentage of tumour-free mice was substantially higher in the Y27632-treated group than in the vehicle-treated group (Fig. 3d), suggesting that ROCK blockade contributes to the induction of durable systemic immune memory and prevention of tumour relapse.

ROCK blockade increases DC-mediated T cell priming

We further assessed the mechanisms through which Y27632 promotes T cell responses against tumour-associated antigens. Tumour cell phagocytosis by APCs can lead to migration of antigen-loaded APCs to tumour-draining LNs, where they fully mature and prime antitumour CD8⁺ T cell responses^29,30. To assess DC maturation following Y27632 treatment in vivo, we analysed expression of costimulatory ligands in DCs from tumour-draining LNs of B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice. CD40 and CD86 expression were comparable in DCs from tumour-bearing mice regardless of Y27632 treatment (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 11a–c). Similar results were observed when BMDCs pretreated with Y27632 were co-cultured with CT26.CL25 cells (Supplementary Fig. 11d–f). Next, to assess whether ROCK blockade increases cross-priming of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells, we performed adoptive transfer (i.v.) of carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labelled ovalbumin (OVA)-specific T (OT-I) cells into B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice and measured proliferation of OT-I T cells. Notably, the percentage of proliferating OT-I T cells was markedly increased in tumour-draining LNs from Y27632-treated mice compared with that in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4b, c). To determine the ability of DCs and macrophages to prime antitumour T cell responses following Y27632 treatment ex vivo, we magnetically enriched DCs and macrophages from tumours or tumour-draining LNs from B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice and then co-cultured them with OVA-specific OT-I cells. DCs from tumours or tumour-draining LNs from Y27632-treated mice increased T cell activation, as assessed by IFN-γ production, whereas macrophages did not (Fig. 4d, e); co-culture with DCs from Y27632-treated mice also increased the number of IFN-γ-producing CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 4f). These results suggest that T cell priming by DCs is important for eliciting an antitumour immune response after Y27632 therapy.

To further assess the mechanism by which ROCK blockade increases T cell priming, we isolated CD11c⁺ DCs from tumour-draining LN and tumours in B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice and analysed DC subtypes and their ability for cross-presentation of tumour-specific antigen. The percentage of CD103⁺ DC was substantially increased in both tumour-draining LNs and tumours from Y27632-treated mice, compared with those from vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4g and Supplementary Fig. 12). Cross-presentation of OVA-derived peptide to major histocompatibility complex-1 (MHC-I) was increased in CD103⁺ and CD8⁺ DCs from tumour-draining LNs and CD103⁺ DCs from tumours of Y27632-treated mice (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 13). Because migratory CD103⁺ DC is the main intratumoural myeloid population that transports tumour-specific antigens to the tumour-draining LNs^31,32, we isolated CD11c⁺ DCs in tumours from B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice and analysed phagocytic ability of CD103⁺ and CD11b⁺ DCs for B16F10-Ova cells. Tumour cell phagocytosis was found to be increased in CD103⁺ DCs, but not CD11b⁺ DCs, from Y27632-treated mice (Fig. 4i and Supplementary Fig. 14). Furthermore, although we did not detect a significant increase in the expression of costimulatory factors in total CD11c⁺ DCs, CD40 expression was markedly increased in CD103⁺ DC population from the tumour-draining LNs from Y27632-treated mice (Fig. 4j and Supplementary Fig. 15). These results suggest that enhanced phagocytosis of cancer cell-derived antigens by migratory CD103⁺ DCs could increase their maturation and cross-presentation of tumour antigen, leading to T cell priming.

ROCK blockade enhances processing of Dox-treated cells

Anthracyclines, such as Dox, have been shown to induce ICD in cancer cells, thereby eliciting an effective antitumour immune response^19,21. Accordingly, we assessed whether ROCK blockade augmented DC-mediated phagocytosis of cells dying an immunogenic death. Treatment of BMDCs with Y27632 caused a substantial increase in the engulfment of Dox-treated tumour cells, as assessed by flow cytometry (Fig. 5a, b). Similar results were observed when BMDCs pretreated with Y27632 were co-cultured with pHrodo-labelled, Dox-treated CT26.CL25 cells in the presence of Y27632 (Fig. 5c, d). ROCK blockade also increased DC-mediated phagocytosis of cells dying a non-immunogenic or necrotic cell death (Supplementary Fig. 16). Cells undergoing ICD have been shown to increase DC maturation and cross-presentation of tumour antigen^33,34. We therefore assessed the effect of ROCK blockade on these processes using our co-culture system. Y27632 treatment increased CD40 and CD86 expression in DCs co-cultured with Dox-treated cells by 19% and 37%, respectively, compared with vehicle treatment (Fig. 5e, f and Supplementary Fig. 17). Cross-presentation of an OVA-derived peptide to MHC-I was markedly increased by co-culture of BMDCs with Dox-treated B16F10-Ova cells in the presence of Y27632, as assessed by staining for the SIINFEKL-H-2k^b complex on the DC surface (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Fig. 18). These results suggest that the combination of an ICD inducer and ROCK blockade efficiently increases the phagocytosis of tumour cells and processing of engulfed tumour antigens.

Combined therapy effectively induces antitumour immunity

To assess the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of Dox and Y27632 on tumour growth, we administered B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice with Y27632 alone or in combination with Dox (Supplementary Fig. 19). We found that the combination of Dox and Y27632 exerted a more dramatic tumour-suppressing effect than Dox or Y27632 alone, producing complete tumour regression in 25% (3 of 12) of mice (Fig. 6a, b). To understand the mechanisms underlying the observed therapeutic benefit, we analysed the sequential immunological events elicited by uptake of tumour-associated antigen necessary to achieve adaptive antitumour immunity. Monotherapy with Y27632 or Dox did not affect DC maturation and cross-presentation of OVA-specific antigen in vivo, as assessed by flow cytometry for costimulatory ligands and the SIINFEKL-H-2k^b complex on the DC surface, respectively (Fig. 6c, d). In contrast, the combination of Y27632 and Dox increased CD40 and CD86 expression as well as cross-presentation of OVA-derived peptide to MHC-I in DCs from tumour-draining LNs of B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice (Fig. 6c, d and Supplementary Fig. 20). To assess whether combined therapy potentiates the ability of DCs to prime CD8⁺ T cells ex vivo, we incubated DCs from tumour-draining LNs with OVA-specific OT-I T cells 20 days after tumour inoculation and analysed T cell activation by evaluating IFN-γ production. Notably, combined therapy induced more secretion of IFN-γ than each monotherapy (Fig. 6e), a finding paralleled by the increased proportion of IFN-γ-secreting CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 6f), suggesting that combined therapy effectively activated T cell immunity. Next, to assess infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into tumours following Dox and/or Y27632 treatment, we performed immunostaining for CD8-positive cells in tumour tissues on 5 days after a course of treatment. Number of tumour-infiltrated CD8⁺ T cells was remarkably increased by combined therapy compared with Y27632 or Dox treatment alone (Fig. 6g, h). Furthermore, to assess the therapeutic effect of combination of Y27632 and a non-ICD inducer in tumour-bearing mice, we determined the therapeutic dose of cisplatin that exerted a similar antitumour effect with 5 mg kg⁻¹ Dox in nude mice and administered B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing C57BL/6 mice with Y27632 alone or in combination with cisplatin. We found that the combination of cisplatin and Y27632 did not exert a more tumour-suppressing effect than Y27632 alone. Any additive effect on the maturation and cross-presentation of DC was not found in combination of Y27632 and cisplatin (Supplementary Fig. 21). These results indicate that the combination of Y27632 and Dox effectively elicits an immune response against tumour antigen, thereby suppressing tumour growth.

Combined therapy is effective in a genetic tumour model

Autochthonous tumours from genetically engineered animals generate immunosuppressive tumour environments and are thus generally refractory to cancer immunotherapy³⁵. To determine the efficacy of combined therapy in an autochthonous tumour model, we used the FVB/N-Tg (MMTVneu) 202Mul/J breast cancer model, in which the Neu oncogene is expressed under transcriptional control of the mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) promoter³⁶. When the first palpable tumour (~50–110 mm³) was identified, mice were injected (i.v.) with Dox alone or in combination with Y27632 (Fig. 7a). In vehicle-treated mice, tumours grew progressively and reached a size >1300 mm³ 50 days after the start of treatment. Treatment with Dox or Y27632 alone reduced the tumour burden, but complete regression of tumour was not detected in any of the treated mice (Fig. 7b). In contrast, combined therapy with Dox and Y27632 efficiently promoted regression of induced tumours, resulting in complete regression in 85% (6 of 7) of mice (Fig. 7b) and improved overall survival (Fig. 7c). On the fifth day after a course of treatment, the infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells into tumours was markedly increased in the group that received combined therapy (Fig. 7d, e). To assess whether combined therapy promotes an immune response against tumour-associated antigens, we isolated splenocytes from tumour-bearing MMTV/Neu mice and analysed their immune response against Neu-derived peptide. IFN-γ production was markedly increased in mice treated with combined therapy compared with that in other groups (Fig. 7f). Collectively, these results clearly indicate that the combination of Y27632 and Dox provides therapeutic benefits in terms of enhanced tumour suppression, even in a genetic MMTV/Neu tumour model.

Discussion

Blocking ROCK activity as a cancer therapy strategy has been extensively explored, with most attention having focused on tumour cell invasion and metastasis^6,7,8,9. In this study, we provide multiple lines of evidence indicating that ROCK blockade modulates the function of phagocytes, enhancing tumour cell phagocytosis and thereby promoting T cell priming. First, we found that inhibition of RhoA/ROCK/myosin II pathway promoted the phagocytosis of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Second, the therapeutic effect of ROCK blockade was dependent on phagocytes and CD8⁺ T cells. Third, ROCK blockade induced antitumour immunity by increasing the ability of DCs to cross-prime activation of CD8⁺ T cells. Furthermore, we here propose a therapeutic strategy combining ROCK blockade with chemotherapeutics that induce ICD of cancer cells. Our results demonstrated that the combination of ROCK blockade and an ICD inducer effectively promoted regression of tumour growth and triggered antitumour immunity in syngeneic and genetically engineered tumour models. The rationale for our combination therapy is that enhancing the phagocytic ability of APCs towards cancer cells undergoing immunogenic death potentiates T cell immunity against tumour cells (Fig. 8).

Uptake of tumour cells or tumour-specific antigens is the first stage of cancer immunity cycle to induce tumour-specific immune responses²⁹. We found that ROCK inhibition increased cancer cell phagocytosis and immune responses for tumour antigen in a syngeneic tumour model. Cell depletion analyses revealed that phagocytes and cytotoxic T cells are important for therapeutic effect of ROCK blockade. We found that ROCK inhibition increased ability of DCs, but not macrophages, to prime T cell activation. However, although not statistically significant, phagocyte depletion by clodronate liposome partially suppressed tumour growth. Given that tumour-associated macrophages can play a protumoural role through different mechanisms³⁷, it is possible that existence of inhibitory macrophages masks the positive effect of Y27632 on macrophages. Cross-presentation of tumour antigens by DCs is an important mechanism for eliciting cytotoxic T cell responses for antitumour immunity³⁸. Specific subtypes of DCs, such as migratory CD103⁺ DCs, promote trafficking of tumour-specific antigen, leading to priming antitumour T cell immunity^31,32. Interestingly, we found that CD103⁺ DCs were increased in tumour-draining LNs and tumours from Y27632-treated mice. Cross-presentation of tumour antigen was markedly increased in CD103⁺ DCs from tumour-draining LNs and tumours of Y27632-treated mice. Recent studies showed CD103⁺ DCs was the main intratumoural myeloid population that transports tumour-specific antigens to the tumour-draining LNs³¹. In agreement with this finding, we found that tumour cell phagocytosis and DC maturation was increased in CD103⁺ DCs from tumours of Y27632-treated mice. Thus, our results suggest that Y27632 enhanced the ability of DCs to prime T cell activation, possibly owing to an increase in phagocytosis of cancer cell-derived antigens by CD103⁺ DCs. On the other hand, it is possible that ROCK blockade directly or indirectly modulates the function of DCs. The effect of RhoA-ROCK blockade on DC function, however, remains controversial. Some studies have shown that ROCK inhibition impairs DC morphology and function^39,40, whereas others have reported that pharmacological inhibition of ROCK enhances antigen presentation by CD1d, an MHC class I-like molecule^41,42. Moreover, a deficiency of a negative regulator of the RhoA/ROCK pathway was found to impair DC-mediated activation of T cells⁴³. Furthermore, DC migration to draining LNs is important for the induction of adaptive immunity. Although activities of small GTPase Rac1 and cdc42 are crucial for cell migration, several studies showed that RhoA/ROCK blockade has a negative effect on DC migration velocity^40,44. However, we found that CD103⁺ DC increased in tumour-draining LNs from Y27632-treated mice. A previous study showed that the reduction of actomyosin contractility via downregulation of RhoA activity and its downstream MLC phosphorylation contributed to CLEC-2-mediated DC migration along stromal cells scaffolds⁴⁵. Thus, migratory CD103⁺ DCs might preferentially use a specific mechanism that causes efficient migration into LNs such as CLEC-2 signalling. Further dissection of the detailed molecular mechanism by which ROCK blockade unleashes DC-mediated T cell priming will be important for exploiting ROCK inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy.

ICD inducers can lead to increased expression of calreticulin, a prophagocytic signal for the uptake of tumour cells by DCs, on the surface of tumour cells and cause the release of ATP and high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) to promote DC maturation and cross-presentation, thereby promoting antitumour immunity^20,33,34. Accordingly, we hypothesize that combination of ICD inducer and ROCK blockade potentiate DC-mediated phagocytosis and processing of cancer cells. Indeed, we found that ROCK blockade markedly enhanced DC-mediated phagocytosis of cell dying an immunogenic death in response to Dox. However, we found that Dox monotherapy did not significantly increase DC maturation or cross-presentation in vivo and exerted only a modest effect on T cell priming and infiltration in tumour-bearing mice. A previous study showed that immunogenic chemotherapy alone may be not sufficient to induce effective antitumour immunity in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments²², suggesting that further intervention is necessary to effectively promote antitumour immunity. Notably, combining Dox therapy with ROCK blockade augmented DC maturation and T cell priming in a syngeneic tumour model. This augmentation was not found in combination of Y27632 and a non-ICD inducer (cisplatin), suggesting that ICD of tumour cells by Dox contributes to potentiation of Y27632-mediated antitumour immunity. Moreover, increased expression of costimulatory markers was detectable in total CD11c⁺ DCs from tumour-draining LNs by only combination of Y27632 and Dox. It is unlikely that increased maturation of CD103⁺ DC population by Y27632 will be reflected in the total DCs. This might be explained in part by synergistic effect of enhanced uptake of tumour-associated antigen by DCs and activated pattern recognition receptor signalling by ICD-related damage-associated molecular patterns (e.g. HMGB1); however, the precise mechanism by which combined therapy enhances DC maturation remains to be clarified. A possible explanation for the effect of combined therapy is that both ICD induction and ROCK blockade contribute to making immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments more immunogenic and also drive immunogenic phagocytosis to efficiently induce antitumour immunity. ROCK-mediated intracellular contractility has been reported to drive tumourigenesis by increasing ECM remodelling and tissue stiffness^11,12. Fibrotic and immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments were further found to be associated with FAK hyperactivation, which is dependent on ROCK activity⁴⁶. Moreover, danger signals from cancer cells dying an immunogenic death also contribute to the generation of ideal conditions for the initiation of antigen-specific immune responses. Notably, we found that the combination of Dox and Y27632 markedly augmented CD8⁺ T cell infiltration in tumours in both syngeneic and MMTV/Neu tumour models compared to each agent alone. Furthermore, phagocytosis of dying cells under homeostatic conditions may restrict immune responses and facilitate pro-tumourigenic responses (tolerogenic phagocytosis), whereas cancer cells killed by an ICD inducer could drive immunogenic phagocytosis and subsequently elicit antitumour immune responses through their antigenicity⁴⁷. In this regard, the combination of a ROCK inhibitor and ICD inducer would be an important strategy for improving the efficacy of immunogenic phagocytosis and thereby potentiating antitumour immunity in an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment.

In summary, we demonstrated that ROCK blockade elicited anticancer immunity by enhancing cancer cell phagocytosis as well as DC-mediated T cell priming. Therefore, modulation of the RhoA/ROCK pathway could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for regulating the phagocytic capacity of APCs in antitumour therapy. The combination of immunogenic killing and enhanced DC-mediated phagocytosis to augment tumour-specific immunity—which evokes the concept of awakening antitumour immunity against immunosuppressive tumours—is thus a promising strategy for maximizing the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

Animals

Eight-week-old male BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Orient Bio. OT-I CD8⁺ T cell receptor (TCR)-Tg male mice and FVB/N-Tg (MMTVneu) 202Mul/J female mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Mice were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST). All experiments were conducted using protocols approved by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care at the KIST.

Reagents

Y27632 dihydrochloride was purchased from Abcam. Neutralizing anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, BE0003-1) and anti-CD8 (clone 2.43, BE0061) antibodies and isotype-matched rat IgG2b control (anti-KLH, clone LTF-2, BE0090) were obtained from BioXcell. Phycoerythrin (PE)-anti-CD86 (clone GL-1, 105008, 1:20), PE-anti-CD40 (clone 3-23, 124610, 1:20), allophycocyanin-anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 101212, 1:100), allophycocyanin-anti-CD8α (clone 53-6.7, 100712, 1:100), allophycocyanin-anti-CD11c (clone N418, 117310, 1:100), allophycocyanin-anti-CD103 (clone 2E7, 121414, 1:100) and allophycocyanin-anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, 123116, 1:100) antibodies were from BioLegend. PE-mouse IgG1 (κ-isotype, MOPC-21, 400111, 1:200), PE-rat IgG1 (κ-isotype, RTK2071, 400407, 1:100), allophycocyanin-armenian hamster IgG (clone HTK888, 400912, 1:100), allophycocyanin-rat IgG2a (κ-isotype, clone RTK2758, 400512, 1:100), PE-rat IgG2a (κ-isotype, clone RTK2758, 400508, 1:20) and allophycocyanin-rat IgG2b (κ-isotype, clone RTK4530, 400612, 1:100) control were from BioLegend. Anti-CD16/CD32 (Fc blocker, clone 2.4G2, 553142, 1:50), anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5, 550280, 1:200) and anti-CD8α antibodies (clone 53-6.7, 550281, 1:200) and rat IgG2a (κ-isotype, R35-95, 559073, 1:1600) were obtained BD Pharmingen. Clodonate liposomes and control liposomes were purchased from FormuMax Scientific Inc. Recombinant murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand were obtained from Peprotech. Recombinant mouse Flt-3 ligand protein and IFN-γ ELISA Kit were purchased from R&D system. Dox hydrochloride, type IV collagenase, blebbistatin, cisplatin and type IV DNase I were obtained from Sigma. 5-Chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) and CellTracker Deep Red were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. pHrodo-SE, Alexa Fluor 488-Annexin V, propidium iodide and CFSE were obtained from Invitrogen. β-Gal_876–884 (TPHPARIGL), rat Neu_420–429 (PDSLRDLSVF)^48,49, P1A (LPYLGWLVF) and NP (RPQASGVYM) peptides were purchased from Peptron. F4/80, CD11c and CD8 MACS sorting systems were purchased from Miltenyi Biotech.

Cell culture

CT26.CL25 cells, which express high levels of both β-gal and the class I molecule H-2 Ld²⁸, were purchased from the ATCC and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) and appropriate antibiotics. B16F10-Ova cells, which express high levels of chicken OVA, were provided by Dr. Seung-Hyo Lee (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium (4.5 g L⁻¹ glucose) supplemented with 10% FBS and appropriate antibiotics. BMDMs were generated by isolating bone marrow cells from 8-week-old male BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice and culturing them for 7 days in the presence of 20 ng ml⁻¹ M-CSF (Peprotech)⁵⁰. For differentiation into BMDCs, bone marrow cells were incubated with 200 ng ml⁻¹ Flt-3 ligand (R&D Systems) and 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol for 10 days. CD8⁺ OT-I T cells were isolated from 8-week-old male naïve OT-I mice using a mouse CD8⁺ T cell enrichment column (R&D Systems). A tumour cell line expressing mCherry was generated by transducing CT26.CL25 cells with retrovirus particles encoding mCherry. After 24 h, the cells were cultured with RPMI-1640 medium containing 10 μg ml⁻¹ puromycin for 2 weeks. mCherry expression was verified by flow cytometry. All cell lines used in this study were tested for mycoplasma contamination.

Phagocytosis assay

For flow cytometry analyses, BMDMs or BMDCs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (1 μM; ThermoFisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37 °C and plated at a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells per 35 mm dish. The next day, CT26.CL25 or B16F10-Ova cells were stained with CMFDA (0.5 μM; ThermoFisher Scientific) and co-cultured with syngeneic BMDMs or BMDCs at a ratio of 1:1 in the presence or absence of Y27632 (30 μM; Abcam) or blebbistatin (5–20 μM; Sigma). After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C, the phagocytosis of cancer cells was analysed by flow cytometry (Accuri C6; BD Biosciences) using the FlowJo (v10) software. Phagocytosis (%) was calculated according to the fomula, number of phagocytes harbouring cancer cells (right-upper quadrant)/total number of phagocytes (right quadrants) × 100. In some experiments, at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h after Y27632 washout, CT26.CL25 or B16F10-Ova cells were added into BMDMs or BMDCs and co-cultured for 2 h, and phagocytosis (%) was analysed by flow cytometry. For phagocytosis of Dox-treated cancer cells, CT26.CL25 or B16F10-Ova cells were treated with 25 or 2.5 μM Dox, respectively, for 24 h at 37 °C to induce cell death. CellTracker Deep Red-labelled BMDMs or BMDCs were incubated with CMFDA-stained, Dox-treated cancer cells for 5 min at 37 °C, and phagocytosis (%) was determined by flow cytometry. In some experiments, BMDMs, cancer cells, or both were treated with Y27632. For phagocytosis of tumour cells dying a non-immunogenic and necrotic cell death, CT26.CL25 or B16F10-Ova cells were treated with cisplatin (150 μM, 24 h) or incubated at 55 ℃ for 30 min to induce non-ICD or necrosis, respectively. For analysis of phagocytic activity in DC subtypes, CD11c⁺ DCs were isolated from tumours in B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice treated with Y27632 or vehicle and incubated with CMFDA-stained B16F10-Ova cells for 2 h. The phagocytosis in CD11b⁺ and CD103⁺ subtypes was analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 101212. 1:100) or anti-CD103 antibody (clone 2E7, 121414, 1:100).

For microscopic analyses, phagocytosis assays were performed using the pH-sensitive pHrodo dye²³. Briefly, CMFDA-stained BMDMs or BMDCs were pretreated with Y27632 (30 μM) or vehicle for 1 h and then incubated with pHrodo-SE-labelled CT26.CL25 cells for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence of Y27632 (30 μM). The cells were washed with basic PBS (pH 10.0) to quench the fluorescence of un-engulfed, pHrodo-SE-labelled cancer cells. Cancer cell phagocytosis was then imaged under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon), and phagocytosis (%) was determined in seven or more randomly selected microscopic fields per experiment.

For analysis of phagocytic activity in macrophages and DCs from mice that are not bearing tumour, CFSE-stained apoptotic thymocytes (1 × 10⁷) were injected (i.v.) into the 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice treated with Y27632 (10 mg kg⁻¹) as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 9a. After 1 h, F4/80⁺ macrophages and CD11c⁺ DCs were isolated from splenocytes and phagocytosis (%) was analysed by flow cytometry.

In vivo tumour models

Subcutaneous syngeneic tumour models were generated by subcutaneously (s.c.) injecting the right flank of 8-week-old male BALB/c mice or C57BL/6 mice with 1 × 10⁶ CT26.CL25 cells or 5 × 10⁵ B16F10-Ova cells. When tumour size reached ~50–100 mm³, Y27632 (10 mg kg⁻¹) or vehicle (PBS) was injected (i.v.) as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 6a, b. Tumours were measured every 3 days, and volume was calculated according to the formula, (width² × length)/2. For nude mice, 1 × 10⁶ CT26.CL25 cells were injected into the right flank of 8-week-old male BALB/c nude mice, and 10 mg kg⁻¹ of Y27632 was injected (i.v.) as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 6d. For antitumour vaccination experiments, primary CT26.CL25 tumours were surgically removed 22 days after tumour inoculation. Seven day later, 7 × 10⁶ CT26.CL25 cells were injected into the contralateral flank of BALB/c mice, and tumour growth was monitored for 25 days as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 6f. For combination therapy, B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice were treated with Y27632 (10 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.) alone or in combination with Dox (5 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.) or cisplatin (3 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.) as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 18. For the MMTV/Neu tumour model, female mice were monitored for tumour development by palpation every 5 days. When tumours reached a size of ~50–110 mm³ (26–32 weeks of age), mice were administered Y27632 (10 mg kg⁻¹) alone or in combination with Dox (5 mg kg⁻¹) as indicated in Fig. 7a. Tumour volume was determined every 3–5 days, and mice were euthanized when tumour volume exceeded 2500 mm³ or if mice exhibited signs of impaired health. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.

Cell depletion experiments

For phagocyte depletion, 200 μl of clodronate liposomes (FormuMax Scientific Inc.) was initially injected (i.p.) 1 day before Y27632 treatment, followed by injection of 100 μl of clodronate liposomes every 4 days, as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 6c. PBS liposomes (FormuMax Scientific Inc.) were used as a negative control. Depletion of F4/80⁺ macrophages or CD11c⁺ DCs was verified by flow cytometry analysis using an allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, 123116, 1:100) or anti-CD11c (clone N418, 117310, 1:100) antibody, respectively. For CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cell depletion, 200 μg neutralizing anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5) or anti-CD8 antibody (clone 2.43) was injected 1 day before Y27632 treatment and then every 3 days thereafter, as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 6e. Rat IgG2b (clone LTF-2) was used as an isotype-matched control. Depletion of CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ cells was verified by flow cytometry using an anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5, 550280, 1:200) or anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7, 100712, 1:100) antibody, respectively.

Flow cytometry

Tumours and tumour-draining LNs were isolated from tumour-bearing mice. Tumour-draining LNs were mechanically digested, and tumours were digested with DNase I and collagenase. Single-cell suspensions were treated Fc blocker (CD16/CD32, clone 2.4G2, 553142, 1:50) for 5 min at 4 °C and then stained with allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, 123116, 1:100), allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11c (clone N418, 117310, 1:100), PE-conjugated anti-CD40 (clone 3.23, 124610, 1:20), PE-conjugated anti-CD86 (clone GL-1, 105008, 1:20), or PE-conjugated anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, 505807, 1:100) antibody for 1 h at 4 °C. After wash with PBS twice times, the cells were subjected to flow cytometry. For analysis of IFN-γ-positive cells, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 7 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 3 min before the addition of antibody. For analysis of PS exposure on the cell surface, CT26.CL25 or B16F10-Ova cells were treated with 30 μM Y27632 for 24 h, stained with Alexa Flour 488-labelled Annexin V, and analysed by flow cytometry.

For DC subset analysis, CD11c⁺ DCs were isolated from tumour-draining LNs and tumours of B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice treated with Y27632 or vehicle through CD11c MACS sorting system. The percentages of CD11b⁺, CD103⁺ and CD8⁺ DCs were analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11b (M1/70, 101212, 1:100), anti-CD103 (2E7, 121414, 1;100), or anti-CD8 (53-6.7, 100712, 1:100) antibodies, respectively. Allophycocyanin-conjugated rat IgG2b (κ-isotype, clone RTK4530, 400612, 1:100), rat IgG2a (κ-isotype, clone RTK2758, 400512, 1:100) and Armenian hamster IgG (clone HTK888, 400912, 1:100) were used as the isotype controls for anti-CD11b, anti-CD8 and anti-CD103 antibodies, respectively.

IFN-γ measurement

CT26.CL25-mCherry tumour-bearing mice were treated with Y27632 or vehicle. Twenty-two days after tumour inoculation, tumour-draining LNs were extracted from mice, and single-cell suspensions from tumour-draining LNs were incubated with 5 μg ml⁻¹ of a β-gal-derived peptide (TPHPARIGL); P1A peptide (LPYLGWLVF) was used as a negative control. After incubation for 48 h, the amount of IFN-γ in the culture medium was measured using a mouse IFN-γ Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems). Antigen-specific IFN-γ production was obtained by subtracting nonspecific production obtained using the negative control peptide. In some experiments, CD8⁺ and CD8⁻ cells were isolated from tumour-draining LN cells from tumour-bearing mice, and IFN-γ production in response to β-gal-derived peptide was analysed. For tumour-bearing MMTV/Neu mice, splenocytes were isolated 5 days after Y27632 and/or Dox treatment, and a single-cell suspension was incubated with 10 μg ml⁻¹ rat Neu-derived peptide (PDSLRDLSVF); NP peptide (RPQASGVYM) was used as a negative control.

Analysis of DC maturation

For in vitro DC maturation, CMFDA-stained BMDCs were pretreated with Y27632 (30 μM) or vehicle for 1 h and co-cultured with CT26.CL25 cells or Dox-treated CT26.CL25 cells for 4 h at 37 °C in the presence of Y27632 or vehicle. After removal of un-engulfed cells, BMDCs were incubated in the presence of Y27632 or vehicle for an additional 20 h. The percentage and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD40⁺ or CD86⁺ BMDCs was then analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD40 (clone 3/23, 124611, 1:20) and anti-CD86 (clone GL-1, 105011, 1:100) antibodies; allophycocyanin-conjugated IgG2a (clone RTK2758, 400512, 1:100) was used as an isotype control. For in vivo analysis, B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice were administered Y27632 (10 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.) and/or Dox (5 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.). On day 20 after tumour inoculation, the percentage and MFI of CD40⁺ or CD86⁺ DCs among tumour-draining LN cells from tumour-bearing mice was analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11c (clone N418, 117310, 1:100) and PE-conjugated anti-CD40 (clone 3-23, 124610, 1:20) or anti-CD86 antibodies (clone GL-1, 105008, 1:20). In some experiments, CD11c⁺ DCs were isolated from tumour-draining LN, and the percentage and MFI of CD40⁺ cells in CD11c⁺CD103⁺ DCs or CD11c⁺CD8⁺ DCs was analysed by flow cytometry using PE-conjugated anti-CD40 antibody and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD103 (clone 2E7, 121414, 1:100) or anti-CD8 antibody (clone 53-6.7, 100712, 1:100).

T cell priming assay

Cross-priming of CD8⁺ T cells was analysed by measuring the proliferation of OVA-specific T cells (OT-I) using a carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution assay⁵¹. Briefly, B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice were treated (i.v.) with Y27632 and/or Dox; 20 days after tumour inoculation, 2 × 10⁶ CFSE-labelled CD8⁺ OT-I T cells were injected (i.v.) into mice. Three days later tumour-draining LNs were removed, and proliferation of CSFE-labelled OT-I T cells from tumour-draining LN cells was analysed by flow cytometry. For ex vivo T cell priming assays, B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice were treated (i.v.) with Y27632 and/or Dox. Tumours and tumour-draining LNs were extracted 20 days after tumour inoculation and enzymatically digested by incubating with collagenase IV and DNase I for 1 h. Cells from tumours and tumour-draining LNs were then mechanically dissociated through a 40-μm cell strainer, and DCs and macrophages were purified using CD11c and F4/80 MACS sorting systems (Miltenyi Biotech), respectively. DCs or macrophages (5 × 10⁴ each) were co-cultured with 2.5 × 10⁵ purified OT-I T cells for 3 days. The supernatants were collected, and IFN-γ was measured using a mouse IFN-γ Quantikine ELISA Kit. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and the percentage of IFN-γ-producing CD8⁺ T cells was analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD8α (clone 53-6.7, 100712, 1:100) and PE-conjugated anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, 505807, 1:100) antibodies. PE-conjugated rat IgG1 (κ-isotype, RTK2071, 400407, 1:100) was used as the isotype control for anti-IFN-γ antibody.

Cross-presentation analysis

Detection of OVA peptide–MHC-I complexes on the surface of DCs was analysed by flow cytometry^34,52. For in vitro analyses, CMFDA-stained BMDCs were pretreated with Y27632 or vehicle for 1 h and co-cultured with 2 × 10⁵ B16F10-Ova cells or Dox-treated B16F10-Ova cells for 4 h. After removal of un-engulfed cells, BMDCs were incubated for an additional 20 h. The percentage of H-2k^b-OVA⁺ BMDCs was analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-H-2k^b-OVA (clone 25-D1.16, 141605, 1:20) antibody. For in vivo analyses, B16F10-Ova tumour-bearing mice were treated (i.v.) with Y27632 and/or Dox; 4 days after treatment, the percentage of H-2k^b-OVA⁺ DCs among tumour-draining LN cells was analysed by flow cytometry using allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11c (clone N418, 117310, 1:100) and PE-conjugated anti-H-2k^b-OVA (clone 25-D1.16, 141603, 1:200) antibodies. For analysis in DC subsets, CD11c or DCs were isolated from tumour-draining LNs and tumours, and the percentages of H-2k^b-OVA⁺ cells in CD11b⁺, CD103⁺ or CD8⁺ DCs were analysed by flow cytometry using PE-conjugated anti-H-2k^b-OVA antibody and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 101212, 1:100), anti-CD103 (clone 2E7, 121414, 1:100), or anti-CD8 antibody (clone 53-6.7, 100712, 1:100). PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 (κ isotype, MOPC-21, 400111, 1:200) was used as the isotype control for anti-H-2k^b-OVA antibody.

Immunostaining

Tumour tissues were dehydrated and embedded in OCT compound in cryomolds, then cut into 10-μm sections using a rotary microtome. After blocking nonspecific immunoglobulin binding by incubating with PBS supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin for 1 h, sections were incubated with anti-CD8α antibody (clone 53-6.7, 550281, 1:200) at 4 °C overnight, washed extensively with PBS, and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 712-546-153, 1:400). Purified rat IgG2a (κ-isotype, clone R35-95, 559073, 1:1,600) was used as isotype-matched control. CD8⁺ cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon), and the number of CD8⁺ T cells per mm² was calculated using the Image J program.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS software (v23). Sample sizes in experiments were chosen on the basis of sizes reported in this field. Data were first analysed for a normal distribution using a Shapiro–Wilks test. Comparisons between two groups were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (for normally distributed data) or Mann–Whitney test (for non-normally distributed data). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons of more than two groups, and multiple comparisons were performed using a Tukey’s post hoc test. In cases where data were not normally distributed, a Kruskal–Wallis test was used, and multiple comparisons were performed using a Mann–Whitney test with Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance for tumour-free frequency and survival benefit was determined using a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. All results are expressed as means ± s.d. or means ± s.e.m. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant; individual P values are indicated in figure legends.

Data availability

All relevant data are available with the article and its Supplementary Information files, or available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

Mellman, I., Coukos, G. & Dranoff, G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 480, 480–489 (2011).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Montalvao, F. et al. The mechanism of anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion revealed by intravital imaging. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 5098–103 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Abes, R., Gelize, E., Fridman, W. H. & Teillaud, J. L. Long-lasting antitumor protection by anti-CD20 antibody through cellular immune response. Blood 116, 926–34 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Etienne-Manneville, S. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420, 629–35 (2002).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sit, S. T. & Manser, E. Rho GTPases and their role in organizing the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell. Sci. 124, 679–83 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Itoh, K. et al. An essential part for Rho-associated kinase in the transcellular invasion of tumor cells. Nat. Med. 5, 221–5 (1999).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Patel, R. A. et al. RKI-1447 is a potent inhibitor of the Rho-associated ROCK kinases with anti-invasive and antitumor activities in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 72, 5025–34 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Vigil, D. et al. ROCK1 and ROCK2 are required for non-small cell lung cancer anchorage-independent growth and invasion. Cancer Res. 72, 5338–47 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sadok, A. et al. Rho kinase inhibitors block melanoma cell migration and inhibit metastasis. Cancer Res. 75, 2272–84 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Patel, R. A., Liu, Y., Wang, B., Li, R. & Sebti, S. M. Identification of novel ROCK inhibitors with anti-migratory and anti-invasive activities. Oncogene 33, 550–5 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Samuel, M. S. et al. Actomyosin-mediated cellular tension drives increased tissue stiffness and beta-catenin activation to induce epidermal hyperplasia and tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 19, 776–91 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Rath, N. & Olson, M. F. Rho-associated kinases in tumorigenesis: re-considering ROCK inhibition for cancer therapy. EMBO Rep. 13, 900–8 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Teiti, I. et al. In vivo effects in melanoma of ROCK inhibition-induced FasL overexpression. Front. Oncol. 5, 156 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tosello-Trampont, A. C., Nakada-Tsukui, K. & Ravichandran, K. S. Engulfment of apoptotic cells is negatively regulated by Rho-mediated signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49911–9 (2003).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Leverrier, Y. & Ridley, A. J. Requirement for Rho GTPases and PI 3-kinases during apoptotic cell phagocytosis by macrophages. Curr. Biol. 11, 195–9 (2001).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y. et al. Coordinated balance of Rac1 and RhoA plays key roles in determining phagocytic appetite. PLoS ONE 12, e0174603 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Rabinovich, G. A., Gabrilovich, D. & Sotomayor, E. M. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 267–96 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Green, D. R., Ferguson, T., Zitvogel, L. & Kroemer, G. Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 353–63 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O. & Zitvogel, L. Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 31, 51–72 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Obeid, M. et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat. Med. 13, 54–61 (2007).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Casares, N. et al. Caspase-dependent immunogenicity of doxorubicin-induced tumor cell death. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1691–701 (2005).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ciampricotti, M., Hau, C. S., Doornebal, C. W., Jonkers, J. & de Visser, K. E. Chemotherapy response of spontaneous mammary tumors is independent of the adaptive immune system. Nat. Med. 18, 344–6 (2012). author reply 346.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Miksa, M., Komura, H., Wu, R., Shah, K. G. & Wang, P. A novel method to determine the engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages using pHrodo succinimidyl ester. J. Immunol. Methods 342, 71–7 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Krijnen, P. A. et al. Inhibition of Rho-ROCK signaling induces apoptotic and non-apoptotic PS exposure in cardiomyocytes via inhibition of flippase. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 49, 781–90 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Amano, M. et al. Phosphorylation and activation of myosin by Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20246–9 (1996).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Matsumura, F., Totsukawa, G., Yamakita, Y. & Yamashiro, S. Role of myosin light chain phosphorylation in the regulation of cytokinesis. Cell Struct. Funct. 26, 639–44 (2001).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Frith, J. C., Monkkonen, J., Blackburn, G. M., Russell, R. G. & Rogers, M. J. Clodronate and liposome-encapsulated clodronate are metabolized to a toxic ATP analog, adenosine 5′-(beta, gamma-dichloromethylene) triphosphate, by mammalian cells in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 1358–67 (1997).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Granot, T., Yamanashi, Y. & Meruelo, D. Sindbis viral vectors transiently deliver tumor-associated antigens to lymph nodes and elicit diversified antitumor CD8+ T cell immunity. Mol. Ther. 22, 112–22 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity 39, 1–10 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & Ruffell, B. Dendritic cells and cancer immunity. Trends Immunol. 37, 855–865 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Salmon, H. et al. Expansion and activation of CD103(+) dendritic cell progenitors at the tumor site enhances tumor responses to therapeutic PD-L1 and BRAF inhibition. Immunity 44, 924–38 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Roberts, E. W. et al. Critical role for CD103(+)/CD141(+) dendritic cells bearing CCR7 for tumor antigen trafficking and priming of T cell immunity in melanoma. Cancer Cell 30, 324–336 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Garg, A. D. et al. A novel pathway combining calreticulin exposure and ATP secretion in immunogenic cancer cell death. EMBO J. 31, 1062–79 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Apetoh, L. et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat. Med. 13, 1050–9 (2007).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Olive, K. P. et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324, 1457–61 (2009).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Guy, C. T. et al. Expression of the neu protooncogene in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces metastatic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10578–82 (1992).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Noy, R. & Pollard, J. W. Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity 41, 49–61 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kurts, C., Robinson, B. W. & Knolle, P. A. Cross-priming in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 403–14 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M. et al. A pivotal role of Rho GTPase in the regulation of morphology and function of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 167, 3585–91 (2001).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nitschke, M. et al. Differential requirement for ROCK in dendritic cell migration within lymphatic capillaries in steady-state and inflammation. Blood 120, 2249–58 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gallo, R. M. et al. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by Rho kinase controls antigen presentation by CD1d. J. Immunol. 189, 1689–98 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Basbous, S. et al. The Rho-ROCK pathway as a new pathological mechanism of innate immune subversion in chronic myeloid leukaemia. J. Pathol. 240, 262–268 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. Dendritic cell motility and T cell activation requires regulation of Rho-cofilin signaling by the Rho-GTPase activating protein myosin IXb. J. Immunol. 192, 3559–68 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Lammermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–5 (2008).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Acton, S. E. et al. Podoplanin-rich stromal networks induce dendritic cell motility via activation of the C-type lectin receptor CLEC-2. Immunity 37, 276–89 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Jiang, H. et al. Targeting focal adhesion kinase renders pancreatic cancers responsive to checkpoint immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 22, 851–60 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Garg, A. D., Romano, E., Rufo, N. & Agostinis, P. Immunogenic versus tolerogenic phagocytosis during anticancer therapy: mechanisms and clinical translation. Cell Death Differ. 23, 938–51 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ercolini, A. M. et al. Identification and characterization of the immunodominant rat HER-2/neu MHC class I epitope presented by spontaneous mammary tumors from HER-2/neu-transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 170, 4273–80 (2003).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ercolini, A. M. et al. Recruitment of latent pools of high-avidity CD8(+) T cells to the antitumor immune response. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1591–602 (2005).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Goncalves, R. & Mosser, D. M. The isolation and characterization of murine macrophages. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1401s83 (2008).
Parish, C. R., Glidden, M. H., Quah, B. J. & Warren, H. S. Use of the intracellular fluorescent dye CFSE to monitor lymphocyte migration and proliferation. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im0409s84 (2009).
Porgador, A., Yewdell, J. W., Deng, Y., Bennink, J. R. & Germain, R. N. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide–MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity 6, 715–26 (1997).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Korean government (2017R1A3B1023418), the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (1420390), the KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology Program and the KIST Institutional Program.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Gi-Hoon Nam, Eun Jung Lee.

Authors and Affiliations

KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea
Gi-Hoon Nam, Yoon Kyoung Kim, Yeonsun Hong, Yoonjeong Choi, Dong June Ahn, Ick-Chan Kwon & In-San Kim
Center for Theragnosis, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea
Gi-Hoon Nam, Eun Jung Lee, Yoon Kyoung Kim, Yeonsun Hong, Yoonjeong Choi, Myung-Jeom Ryu, Yoosoo Yang, Ick-Chan Kwon, Seung-Yoon Park & In-San Kim
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Applied Chemical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea
Eun Jung Lee
College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea
Myung-Jeom Ryu
Research Animal Resource Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea
Jiwan Woo & Yakdol Cho
Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, 38066, Republic of Korea
Seung-Yoon Park

Authors

Gi-Hoon Nam
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eun Jung Lee
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yoon Kyoung Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yeonsun Hong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yoonjeong Choi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Myung-Jeom Ryu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jiwan Woo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yakdol Cho
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dong June Ahn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yoosoo Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ick-Chan Kwon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Seung-Yoon Park
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
In-San Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I-.S.K. and S-.Y.P. designed the project and experiments. I-.S.K., S-.Y.P. and G-.H.N. analysed all data. I-.S.K. and S-.Y.P. wrote the manuscript. G-.H.N., E.J.L., Y.K.K., Y.H., Y.C. and M-.J.R. performed in vitro experiments. G-.H.N. and E.J.L. carried out in vivo experiments. I-.C.K., Y.Y. and D.J.A. provided advice and made suggestions for the manuscript. J.W. and Y.C. contributed to animal management.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seung-Yoon Park or In-San Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nam, GH., Lee, E., Kim, Y.K. et al. Combined Rho-kinase inhibition and immunogenic cell death triggers and propagates immunity against cancer. Nat Commun 9, 2165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04607-9

Download citation

Received: 20 November 2017
Accepted: 11 May 2018
Published: 04 June 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04607-9

This article is cited by

Adverse clinical outcomes and immunosuppressive microenvironment of RHO-GTPase activation pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma
- Qi Yang
- Zewei Zhuo
- Hao Chen
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
Nanomaterials in tumor immunotherapy: new strategies and challenges
- Xudong Zhu
- Shenglong Li
Molecular Cancer (2023)
Nanomaterials: small particles show huge possibilities for cancer immunotherapy
- Ziyin Chen
- Ziqi Yue
- Shenglong Li
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2022)
ROCK1 mechano-signaling dependency of human malignancies driven by TEAD/YAP activation
- Davide Esposito
- Ila Pant
- Stuart A. Aaronson
Nature Communications (2022)
Nanocages displaying SIRP gamma clusters combined with prophagocytic stimulus of phagocytes potentiate anti-tumor immunity
- Yoonjeong Choi
- Gi-Hoon Nam
- In-San Kim
Cancer Gene Therapy (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.