Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Current stepwise recommendations for hypogonadism screening in erectile dysfunction are not cost-effective

Abstract

Hypogonadism is a prevalent comorbidity with erectile disfunction (ED) and current guidelines recommend screening for hypogonadism with total testosterone (TT). If low TT is detected, further assessment with LH and SHBG plus albumin are needed to establish an etiology and treatment. Our primary objective was to determine the cost benefit of current stepwise approach versus ad initium full hormonal assessment. Two hundred consecutive male patients referred for ED were screened after consent and 81 were included and assessed for hypogonadism according to the current stepwise approach with TT, and only if TT was less than 345 ng/mL, a full hormonal assessment with TT, LH, and SHBG plus albumin to calculate free testosterone was performed. Direct costs were calculated using the national public healthcare system reimbursement tables and were compared with a hypothetical initial full hormonal assessment. Screening TT was less than 345 ng/mL in 34.6% patients leading to a full hormonal assessment on these. Using a stepwise approach there was a direct cost increase of 5.82 € per patient. Moreover, one out of every three patients had two extra venipunctures and an additional follow-up appointment. Current stepwise recommendations may prove costly in high prevalence scenarios such as the ED subpopulation as a direct cost increase was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araujo AB, Esche GR, Kupelian V, O'Donnell AB, Travison TG, Williams RE, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic androgen deficiency in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4241–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tajar A, Huhtaniemi IT, O'Neill TW, Finn JD, Pye SR, Lee DM, et al. Characteristics of androgen deficiency in late-onset hypogonadism: results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1508–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corona G, Maggi M. The role of testosterone in erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:46–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corona G, Isidori AM, Aversa A, Burnett AL, Maggi M. Endocrinologic control of men's sexual desire and arousal/erection. J Sex Med. 2016;13:317–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corona G, Sforza A, Maggi M. Testosterone replacement therapy: long-term safety and efficacy. World J Mens Health. 2017;35:65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean JD, McMahon CG, Guay AT, Morgentaler A, Althof SE, Becher EF, et al. The International Society for Sexual Medicine's Process of Care for the assessment and management of testosterone deficiency in adult men. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1660–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Hodis HN, Matsumoto AM, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2018;103:1715–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mulhall J, Trost L, Brannigan R, Kurtz E, Redmon J, Chiles K, et al. Evaluation and Management of Testosterone Deficiency. 2018. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/testosterone-deficiency-(2018)#x7647.

  9. Hatzimouratidis K, Giuliano F, Moncada I, Muneer A, Salonia A, Verze P. Male sexual dysfunction. In EAU guidelines. EAU Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands; 2018.

  10. Chamnan P, Simmons RK, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. Estimating the potential population impact of stepwise screening strategies for identifying and treating individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes: a modelling study. Diabet Med. 2012;29:893–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maseroli E, Corona G, Rastrelli G, Lotti F, Cipriani S, Forti G, et al. Prevalence of endocrine and metabolic disorders in subjects with erectile dysfunction: a comparative study. J Sex Med. 2015;12:956–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mushtaq S, Khan K, Abid S, Umer A, Raza T. Frequency of hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction in type-II diabetic patients. Cureus. 2018;10:e2654.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Portaria nº207/2017, Diário da República n.º 132/2017, 2º Suplemento, Série I de 2017-07-11, Ministério da Saúde, 2017. https://dre.pt/home/-/dre/107677706/details/maximized. https://dre.pt/application/conteudo/107669157.

  14. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM. A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:3666–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012;29:855–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kvamme MK, Lie E, Kvien TK, Kristiansen IS. Two-year direct and indirect costs for patients with inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases: data from real-life follow-up of patients in the NOR-DMARD registry. Rheumatol. 2012;51:1618–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tajima-Pozo K, de Castro Oller MJ, Lewczuk A, Montanes-Rada F. Understanding the direct and indirect costs of patients with schizophrenia. F1000Res. 2015;4:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jannini EA, Isidori AM, Aversa A, Lenzi A, Althof SE. Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2359–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang C, Cunningham G, Dobs A, Iranmanesh A, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, et al. Long-term testosterone gel (AndroGel) treatment maintains beneficial effects on sexual function and mood, lean and fat mass, and bone mineral density in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2085–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzmann M, Mattern A, Hanisch J, Gooren L, Jones H, Maggi M. IPASS: a study on the tolerability and effectiveness of injectable testosterone undecanoate for the treatment of male hypogonadism in a worldwide sample of 1,438 men. J Sex Med. 2013;10:579–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corona G, Maseroli E, Rastrelli G, Sforza A, Forti G, Mannucci E, et al. Characteristics of compensated hypogonadism in patients with sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1823–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventimiglia E, Ippolito S, Capogrosso P, Pederzoli F, Cazzaniga W, Boeri L, et al. Primary, secondary and compensated hypogonadism: a novel risk stratification for infertile men. Andrology. 2017;5:505–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang YP, Liu W, Chen SF, Liu YD, Chen B, Deng CH, et al. Free testosterone correlated with erectile dysfunction severity among young men with normal total testosterone. Int J Impot Res, 2014;31:132–8.

  24. Kohler TS, Kim J, Feia K, Bodie J, Johnson N, Makhlouf A, et al. Prevalence of androgen deficiency in men with erectile dysfunction. Urology. 2008;71:693–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Corona G, Mannucci E, Petrone L, Ricca V, Balercia G, Mansani R, et al. Association of hypogonadism and type II diabetes in men attending an outpatient erectile dysfunction clinic. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:190–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afonso Morgado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgado, A., Moura, M.L., Dinis, P. et al. Current stepwise recommendations for hypogonadism screening in erectile dysfunction are not cost-effective. Int J Impot Res 32, 297–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0169-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0169-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links