Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Low-intensity shock wave therapy ameliorates erectile dysfunction in men with pelvic fractures associated with urethral injury

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in patients with pelvic fractures associated with urethral injury (PFUI). We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shock wave therapy (LiSWT) in ED treatment related to PFUI. Forty-three consecutive patients with PFUI who underwent surgical repair between January 2014 and March 2017 were sampled in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. ED onset following surgical repair was initially treated with oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) for six months. PDE5i non-responders were referred for LiSWT of six weekly sessions. Erectile function was evaluated by the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Forty-three consecutive patients were enrolled in our study. ED was observed in 79.1% (34/43) patients following surgical repair. These 34 patients were given oral PDE5i (Tadalafil® 5 mg) daily treatment, 64.7% (22/34) patients restored erectile function to normal range (EHS: 3.4 ± 1.3, IIEF-5: 21.7 ± 1.0). The other twelve PDE5i non-responders were referred for LiSWT. Seven patients (58.3%, 7/12) remained unable to maintain the rigidity for full sexual intercourse. The other five patients reported allowing full sexual intercourse. Based on our results, LiSWT may ameliorate the ED in men with PFUI and shift PDE5i non-responders to responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Feldman HA, Derby CA, Kleinman KP, McKinlay JB. Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol. 2000;163:460–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. NIH consensus conference. NIH consensus development panel on impotemce. Conf Impot JAMA. 1993;270:83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soterio-Pires JH, Hirotsu C, Kim LJ, Bittencourt L, Tufik S, Andersen ML. The interaction between erectile dysfunction complaints and depression in men: a cross-sectional study about sleep, hormones and quality of life. Int J Impot Res. 2017;29:70–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, et al. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol. 2010;57:804–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen AB, Persiani M, Boie S, Hanna M, Lund L. Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile dysfunction? A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Urol. 2015;49:329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vardi Y, Appel B, Jacob G, Massarwi O, Gruenwald I. Can low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve erectile function? A 6-month follow-up pilot study in patients with organic erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2010;58:243–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sokolakis I, Dimitriadis F, Psalla D, Karakiulakis G, Kalyvianakis D, Hatzichristou D. Effects of low-intensity shock wave therapy (LiST) on the erectile tissue of naturally aged rats. Int J Impot Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0064-0. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shenfeld OZ, Kiselgorf D, Gofrit ON, et al. The incidence and causes of erectile dysfunction after pelvic fractures associated with posterior urethral disruption. J Urol. 2003;169:2173–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu Q, Zhang J, Sa YL, Jin SB, Xu YM. Recurrence and complications after transperineal bulboprostatic anastomosis for posterior urethral strictures resulting from pelvic fracture: a retrospective study from a urethral referral centre. BJU Int. 2013;112:358–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnsen NV, Kaufman MR, Dmochowski RR, Milam DF. Erectile dysfunction following pelvic fracture urethral injury. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:114–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Assmy A, Harraz AM, Benhassan M, Nabeeh A, Ibrahiem, el H. Erectile function after anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injuries. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:139–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling. III: chest wall, abdominal vascular, ureter, bladder, and urethra. J Trauma. 1992;33:337–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein I, Mulhall JP, Bushmakin AG, et al. The erection hardness score and its relationship to successful sexual intercourse. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2374–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scarberry K, Bonomo J, Gómez RG. Delayed posterior urethroplasty following pelvic fracture urethral injury: do we have to wait 3 months? Urology. 2018;116:193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrich DE, Day AC, Mundy AR. Proposed mechanisms of lower urinary tract injury in fractures of the pelvic ring. BJU Int. 2007;100:567–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shenfeld OZ, Gofrit ON, Gdor Y, et al. The role of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with pelvic fracture urethral disruption. J Urol. 2004;172:2350–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng J, Zhang Z, Cui W, et al. Role of nocturnal penile erection test on response to daily sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction due to pelvic fracture urethral disruption: a single-center experience. Urology. 2014;84:1389–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carvalheira AA, Pereira NM, Maroco J, Forjaz V. Dropout in the treatment of erectile dysfunction with PDE5: a study on predictors and a qualitative analysis of reasons for discontinuation. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moemen MN, Hamed HA, Kamel II, Shamloul RM, Ghanem HM. Clinical and sonographic assessment of the side effects of intracavernous injection of vasoactive substances. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:143–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bechara A, Casabé A, De Bonis W, Ciciclia PG. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction in patients who do not respond to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Sex Med. 2016;4:225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li H, Matheu MP, Sun F, et al. Low-energy shock wave therapy ameliorates erectile dysfunction in a pelvic neurovascular injuries rat model. J Sex Med. 2016;13:22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tepeköylü C, Wang FS, Kozaryn R, et al. Shock wave treatment induces angiogenesis 15 and mobilizes endogenous CD31/CD34-positive endothelial cells in a hindlimb ischemia model: implications for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:971–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsu-Ming Chien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, CJ., Lu, YM., Li, CC. et al. Low-intensity shock wave therapy ameliorates erectile dysfunction in men with pelvic fractures associated with urethral injury. Int J Impot Res 31, 218–222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0094-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0094-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links