Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Factors governing the transduction efficiency of adeno-associated virus in the retinal ganglion cells following intravitreal injection

Abstract

Efficient transduction of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is a prerequisite to maximize therapeutic outcomes in any form of gene therapy for optic neuropathies. Whereas subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2) has been well-characterized, the serotype, viral load, and promoter combinations that govern RGC transduction efficiency following intravitreal injection remains poorly understood. We evaluated the transduction efficiency of seven AAV2 serotypes (AAV2/1, AAV2/2, AAV2/4, AAV2/5, AAV2/6, AAV2/8, and AAV2/9) for the RGCs at 4 weeks following intravitreal injection in C57BL/6J mice. Intravitreal injection of 1 × 109 vg of AAV2/2 with eGFP driven by the CMV promoter attained a higher transduction efficiency for the RGCs (60.0 ± 4.2%) compared with the six other AAV2 serotypes with eGFP driven by the same promoter injected at the same viral load ( < 3.0%). Reporter driven by the CAG promoter had a lower transduction efficiency (up to 42.0 ± 5.8%) compared with that driven by the CMV reporter (60.0 ± 4.2%, p ≤ 0.024). There was a viral dose-dependent transduction effect of AAV2/2-CMV-eGFP and the transduction efficiency was 40.2 ± 3.9%, 16.6 ± 4.2%, and 2.6 ± 0.2% when the viral load decreased to 5 × 108 vg, 1 × 108 vg, and 1 × 107 vg, respectively. Optimizing viral serotype, viral load, and promoter construct of AAV2 is important to maximize transgene expression in RGC-targeted gene therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Barker SS, Robbie S, Henderson R, Balaggan K, et al. Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2231–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maguire AM, Simonelli F, Pierce EA, Pugh EN Jr., Mingozzi F, Bennicelli J, et al. Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:2240–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG, Beltran WA, Sumaroka A, Swider M, Iwabe S, et al. Human retinal gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis shows advancing retinal degeneration despite enduring visual improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E517–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bainbridge JW, Mehat MS, Sundaram V, Robbie SJ, Barker SE, Ripamonti C, et al. Long-term effect of gene therapy on Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1887–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Russell S, Bennett J, Wellman JA, Chung DC, Yu ZF, Tillman A, et al. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:849–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MacLaren RE, Groppe M, Barnard AR, Cottriall CL, Tolmachova T, Seymour L, et al. Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: initial findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1129–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards TL, Jolly JK, Groppe M, Barnard AR, Cottriall CL, Tolmachova T, et al. Visual acuity after retinal gene therapy for choroideremia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1996–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McDougald DS, Dine KE, Zezulin AU, Bennett J, Shindler KS. SIRT1 and NRF2 gene transfer mediate distinct neuroprotective effects upon retinal ganglion cell survival and function in experimental optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:1212–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith CA, Chauhan BC. In vivo imaging of adeno-associated viral vector labelled retinal ganglion cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanlon KS, Chadderton N, Palfi A, Blanco Fernandez A, Humphries P, Kenna PF, et al. A novel retinal ganglion cell promoter for utility in AAV vectors. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaffiol A, Caplette R, Jaillard C, Brazhnikova E, Desrosiers M, Dubus E, et al. A new promoter allows optogenetic vision restoration with enhanced sensitivity in macaque retina. Mol Ther: J Am Soc Gene Ther. 2017;25:2546–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cen LP, Liang JJ, Chen JH, Harvey AR, Ng TK, Zhang M, et al. AAV-mediated transfer of RhoA shRNA and CNTF promotes retinal ganglion cell survival and axon regeneration. Neuroscience. 2017;343:472–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tshilenge KT, Ameline B, Weber M, Mendes-Madeira A, Nedellec S, Biget M, et al. Vitrectomy before intravitreal injection of AAV2/2 vector promotes efficient transduction of retinal ganglion cells in dogs and nonhuman primates. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2016;27:122–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta ST, Luo X, Park KK, Bixby JL, Lemmon VP. Hyperactivated Stat3 boosts axon regeneration in the CNS. Exp Neurol. 2016;280:115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yungher BJ, Luo X, Salgueiro Y, Blackmore MG, Park KK. Viral vector-based improvement of optic nerve regeneration: characterization of individual axons’ growth patterns and synaptogenesis in a visual target. Gene Ther. 2015;22:811–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guy J, Qi X, Koilkonda RD, Arguello T, Chou TH, Ruggeri M, et al. Efficiency and safety of AAV-mediated gene delivery of the human ND4 complex I subunit in the mouse visual system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4205–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomita H, Sugano E, Yawo H, Ishizuka T, Isago H, Narikawa S, et al. Restoration of visual response in aged dystrophic RCS rats using AAV-mediated channelopsin-2 gene transfer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3821–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leaver SG, Cui Q, Plant GW, Arulpragasam A, Hisheh S, Verhaagen J, et al. AAV-mediated expression of CNTF promotes long-term survival and regeneration of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. Gene Ther. 2006;13:1328–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacLaren RE, Buch PK, Smith AJ, Balaggan KS, MacNeil A, Taylor JS, et al. CNTF gene transfer protects ganglion cells in rat retinae undergoing focal injury and branch vessel occlusion. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:1118–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwong JM, Caprioli J, Piri N. RNA binding protein with multiple splicing: a new marker for retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1052–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez AR, de Sevilla Muller LP, Brecha NC. The RNA binding protein RBPMS is a selective marker of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:1411–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lebherz C, Maguire A, Tang W, Bennett J, Wilson JM. Novel AAV serotypes for improved ocular gene transfer. J Gene Med. 2008;10:375–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung CK, Weinreb RN, Li ZW, Liu S, Lindsey JD, Choi N, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging and measurement of dendritic shrinkage of retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1539–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Smith PD, Wang C, Cai B, et al. Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science. 2008;322:963–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith PD, Sun F, Park KK, Cai B, Wang C, Kuwako K, et al. SOCS3 deletion promotes optic nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron. 2009;64:617–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun F, Park KK, Belin S, Wang D, Lu T, Chen G, et al. Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nature. 2011;480:372–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wan X, Pei H, Zhao MJ, Yang S, Hu WK, He H, et al. Efficacy and safety of rAAV2-ND4 treatment for Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guy J, Feuer WJ, Davis JL, Porciatti V, Gonzalez PJ, Koilkonda RD, et al. Gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: Low- and medium-dose visual results. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1621–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Davis JL, Porciatti V, Gonzalez P, Koilkonda RD, et al. Gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: Initial results. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:558–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gray SJ, Foti SB, Schwartz JW, Bachaboina L, Taylor-Blake B, Coleman J, et al. Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22:1143–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council General Research Fund 2015/2016 (14101215).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher K. S. Leung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, X., Yung, J., Mak, H. et al. Factors governing the transduction efficiency of adeno-associated virus in the retinal ganglion cells following intravitreal injection. Gene Ther 26, 109–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-019-0060-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-019-0060-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links