Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Reliability and comparative validity of a Diet Quality Index for assessing dietary patterns of preschool-aged children in Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Background/objectives

To report on the reliability and validity of a Diet Quality Index (DQI) to assess preschoolers dietary patterns using a short food frequency questionnaire (sFFQ) and 3-day food records (3d-FR).

Subjects/methods

Seventy-seven preschool carers/parents completed a telephone interview on preschoolers (2–5-year olds) dietary habits in metropolitan Sydney. Agreement in scores was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) and paired t-tests for repeated sFFQ–DQI scores and Bland–Altman methods and paired t-tests for sFFQ–DQI and 3d-FR–DQI scores.

Results

Mean-total sFFQ–DQI ICC scores was high = 0.89, 95% CI (0.81, 0.93). There was weak agreement between sFFQ–DQI and 3d-FR–DQI scores (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). The 3d-FR–DQI scores were positively associated with carbohydrate, folate, ß-carotene, magnesium, calcium, protein, total fat and negatively associated with sugar, starch, niacin, vitamin C, phosphorus, polyunsaturated fat, and monounsaturated fat.

Conclusions

The sFFQ–DQI demonstrated good reliability but weak validity. Associations between nutrients and 3d-FR–DQI scores indicate promising usability and warrants further investigation. Further research is needed to establish its validity in accurately scoring children’s diet quality using sFFQ compared to 3d-FR before the tool can be implemented for use in population settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarou C, Newby P. Use of dietary indexes among children in developed countries. Adv Nutr. 2011;2:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perry CP, Keane E, Layte R, Fitzgerald AP, Perry IJ, Harrington JM. The use of a dietary quality score as a predictor of childhood overweight and obesity. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kant AK. Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96(8):785–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy ET, Ohls J, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy eating index. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(10):1103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94(1):57–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flood VM, Wen LM, Hardy LL, Rissel C, Simpson JM, Baur LA. Reliability and validity of a short FFQ for assessing the dietary habits of 2–5-year-old children, Sydney, Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(03):498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NHMRC. Eat for Health: Australian Dietary Guidelines Summary. Canberra: NHMRC, Department of Health and Ageing; 2013. Contract No.: ISBN: 1864965789.

  8. Rangan AM, Randall D, Hector DJ, Gill TP, Webb KL. Consumption of /‘extra/‘ foods by Australian children: types, quantities and contribution to energy and nutrient intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;62(3):356–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Australian Health Survey: Nutrition First Results—Food & Nutrients 2011–12. Canberra: ABS; 2014. Report No. 43640DO008.

  10. Huybrechts I, Vereecken C, De Bacquer D, Vandevijvere S, Van Oyen H, Maes L, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a diet quality index for children assessed using a FFQ. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(1):135–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is related to the work of the Healthy Beginnings Trial (HBT); however the participants of this study were not part of the HBT. The study was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (ID number: 393112).

Author contributions

The authors’ contributions are as follows: KK and VF developed the DQI tool, KK carried out the data analyses, interpretation of findings and wrote the manuscript. LMW and LB contributed to the data interpretations. VF was the principal investigator and contributed to the study design, data collection and interpretation of findings. MH contributed to the data analyses and study interpretations All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consent was obtained from all parents for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria M Flood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors listed have contributed sufficiently to the project to be included as authors, and all those who are qualified to be authors are listed in the author byline. The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunaratnam, K., Halaki, M., Wen, L.M. et al. Reliability and comparative validity of a Diet Quality Index for assessing dietary patterns of preschool-aged children in Sydney, Australia. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 464–468 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0020-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links