Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

In vitro synergistic effect of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin against Enterococcus faecalis

Abstract

To find a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, we evaluated the effects of combinations of retapamulin with macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis. Using both the disk diffusion test and checkerboard assay, we initially examined the effects of combinations of retapamulin with MLS antibiotics against standard strains of these species. Combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and quinupristin showed synergistic activity against E. faecalis only. Synergy of retapamulin with clindamycin and dalfopristin was not observed. Then, a checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the effects of the combinations against 15 clinical strains of E. faecalis. Retapamulin and quinupristin, the most synergistic combination, showed activity against all erythromycin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains tested. Among the eight strains with high-level erythromycin resistance, five strains were synergistically inhibited in the presence of only 1 μg of retapamulin per ml. Time-kill assay revealed that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin were bacteriostatic. These results suggest that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin have in vitro synergistic activity against E. faecalis, including strains with high-level erythromycin resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Higuita NIA, Huycke MM. Enterococcal disease, epidemiology, and implications for treatment. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014.

  2. Kristich CJ, Rice LB, Arias CA. Enterococcal infection–treatment and antibiotic resistance. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014.

  3. Hollenbeck BL, Rice LB. Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanism in enterococcus. Virulence. 2012;3:421–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conly JM, Johnston BL. Mupirocin—are we in danger of losing it?. Can J Infect Dis 2002;13:157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sood S, Malhotra M, Das BK, Kapil A. Enterococcal infections and antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128:111–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bender JK, Cattoir V, Hegstad K, Sadowy E, Coque TM, Westh H, et al. Update on prevalence and mechanisms of resistance to linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin in enterococci in Europe: towards a common nomenclature. Drug Resist Update. 2018;40:25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai B, Hu K, Zeng J, Yao W, Li D, Pu Z, et al. Linezolid consumption facilitates the development of linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecalis in a tertiary-care hospital: a 5-year surveillance study. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25:791–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarz S, Shen J, Kadlec K, Wang Y, Michael GB, Feßler AT, et al. Lincosamides, streptogramins, phenicols, and pleuromutilins: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6:a027037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poehlsgaard J, Douthwaite S. The bacterial ribosome as a target for antibiotics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:870–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pillai SK, Moellering RCJ, Eliopoulos GM. Antimicrobial combinations. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.

  11. Odds FC. Synergy, antagonism, and what the checkerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52:1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Traczewski MM, Brown SD. Proposed MIC and disk diffusion microbiological cutoffs and spectrum of activity of retapamulin, a novel topical antimicrobial agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3863–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1A6A1A03011325).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hong Min.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, B., Min, YH. In vitro synergistic effect of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin against Enterococcus faecalis. J Antibiot 73, 630–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0312-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0312-7

Search

Quick links