Introduction

Bacterial resistance to known antibacterial agents is a serious problem in treatment of bacterial infections [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), resistance to antibiotics is reaching dangerously high levels, threatening the ability to treat common infectious diseases [2]. Currently, most agents under development are modifications of existing antibiotics, whereas a search for antibiotics of new structural types and mechanisms of action is necessary to overcome the resistance [3]. A key role in the development of existing antibiotics and in the search for new antibiotics is played by compounds isolated from natural sources [4, 5].

An interesting type of natural compounds with pronounced antimicrobial activity is benzopentathiepines isolated from marine invertebrates [6, 7]. For example, lissoclinotoxin A (1) (Fig. 1) isolated from the tunicate Lissoclinum perforatum [8] exhibited antifungal activity against Candida albicans (MIC of 40 μg ml−1) and antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (MIC of 0.1–0.6 μg ml−1) [8, 9]. A methylated analogue of compound 1, varacin 2, was isolated from the ascidian Lissoclinum vareau [10] and Polycitor sp [11], and also demonstrated antifungal (against C. albicans) and antibacterial (against Bacillus subtilus) activities with inhibition zones of 20 mm at 0.1 μg/disk [11]. Synthetic varacin acetate 3 was significantly less active, with effective concentrations being 10 μg/disk for C. albicans and 1 μg/disk for B. subtilus [11]. Benzopentathiepine 4 containing an additional thiomethyl group, which was found in the ascidian Lissoclinum japonicum, exhibited antibacterial activity at relatively high doses (20–50 μg/disk) [12]. A serious obstacle to the practical use of these compounds is their low content in natural sources and their poor availability through synthesis [13] in combination with high cytotoxicity, which stimulates the search for their active, fully synthetic analogues [6]. For example, antifungal activity of synthetic benzopentathiepines 5–9 against agricultural infections Venturia inaequalis (apple scab), Magnaporthe grisea (rice blast fungus), powdery mildew, and Puccinia rust fungus (wheat leaf rust) was demonstrated [14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Natural and synthetic benzopentathiepines with antimicrobial activity

Previously, we found a simple and effective method for synthesis of aminobenzopentathiepine 10 from 1-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene 11, with benzodithiol-2-one 12 being a key intermediate (Fig. 2) [15, 16]. Compound 10 and its hydrochloride, known as TC-2153, exhibited in vivo antidepressant properties and anti-Alzheimer activity [17,18,19], but antimicrobial activity of compound 10 or its derivatives was not studied previously. However, given moderate cytotoxicity [20, 21] and low acute toxicity [15] as well as good antimicrobial activity of benzopentathiepines 1–9, investigation of antimicrobial properties of 10 and its derivatives seems to be promising. This was the aim of this study.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Synthesis of compound 10

Results and discussion

Aminobenzopentathiepine 10 and its amides 13–17 were synthesized according to previously published methods (Fig. 3) [15, 20, 22]. Compounds 18 and 19, analogues of trifluoroacetamide 14 without a pentathiepine ring, were produced from amines 20 and 21.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Synthesis of compounds 13–21

Compound 20 was synthesized by reduction of a nitro group in 12 according to the method [19]. Two approaches were used for synthesis of amine 21. When treated with bases, the pentathiepine ring is destroyed with loss of some sulfur atoms and formation of reactive dithiols [6]. The latter are easily alkylated (e.g., with alkyl dihalides Hal(CH2)nHal) to form new sulfur-containing heterocycles. Indeed, keeping amine 10 solution in CH2Cl2 in the presence of Et3N at room temperature for 10 days led to the formation of compound 21. The conversion of amine 10 under these conditions was 70%, and the yield of compound 21 (in calculation on the reacted amine 10) was 51%.

Another well-known reagent for synthesis of dithiols from pentathiepines is NaBH4 [6]. If an electrophilic reagent (e.g., alkylene dihalide) is present in the reaction mixture, disulfur heterocycles are produced. We reduced the pentathiepine ring in compound 10 using NaBH4, followed by addition of CH2Cl2 to the reaction mixture and keeping the mixture at room temperature for 5 days. In this case, complete conversion of amine 10 occurred, and the yield of compound 21 was 77%.

Antimicrobial activity of compounds 10, 13–19 was studied by The Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery (CO-ADD) [23]. Compounds were tested against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae, multiple drug resistance (MDR) strain; Acinetobacter baumannii; Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strain) bacteria as well as against C. albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans fungi.

A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae, including K. pneumoniae and E. coli, can cause severe and often deadly infections, such as bloodstream infections and pneumonia [24]. MRSA strains also cause difficult-to-treat diseases in humans, such as sepsis and pneumonia, and are among the most dangerous nosocomial pathogens. The development of antibiotics for control of these bacteria is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a high priority [24].

C. albicans and C. neoformans are important hospital pathogens, particularly dangerous in patients with immunodeficiency due to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy, or organ transplantation [25,26,27].

For the tested compounds, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the lowest concentration that inhibits visible growth of microorganisms and is usually reported as a 80% MIC value, was determined. As reference drugs, we used vancomycin and amoxicillin for antibacterial activity and fluconazole for antifungal activity.

All compounds containing the pentathiepine ring (10 and 13–17), as well as their analogues 18 and 19, had no activity against Gram-negative bacteria (MIC > 32 μg ml−1).

The results of testing against Gram-positive S. aureus MRSA and fungal pathogens are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Antimicrobial activity of compounds

The obtained data demonstrate that the parent aminobenzopentathiepine 10 has moderate antibacterial activity against S. aureus, with a MIC of 16 μg ml−1. Similar results were obtained for amides 15 and 16 and the reference drug amoxicillin, while amide 17 containing an additional heteroatom in the lateral substituent was completely inactive. At the same time, the use of acetamide 13 and trifluoroacetamide 14 resulted in a fourfold increase in the activity, with the MIC reaching 4 μg ml−1. The activity of compounds 13 and 14 is superior to that of the reference drug amoxicillin and only slightly lower than that of vancomycin. The lack of antibacterial activity in compounds 18 and 19, analogues of compound 14, which do not contain a polysulfur ring, indicates that the pentathiepine ring is essential for the activity.

Compounds 13 and 14 were also most active against C. albicans, with a MIC of 1 and 2 μg ml−1, respectively (Table 1). In this case, a significant antifungal effect was exhibited by parent compound 10 as well as by amides 15 and 16. Compounds 17 and 18 were not active, whereas benzo [1, 3]dithiole 19 exhibited moderate activity, with a MIC of 32 μg ml−1.

Compound 17 was most active against C. neoformans, but had no activity in other tests; acetamide 13 was the second active compound (Table 1). It should be noted that both compounds were more active than the reference drug fluconazole. The activity of compounds 14–16 was comparable to that of fluconazole, while compounds 10 and 19 were somewhat less active.

An extremely important feature of antimicrobial agents is their toxicity. Therefore, all compounds were tested for cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity, which were also examined by CO-ADD.

Cytotoxicity was determined on HEK293 cells. Of all the tested compounds, only acetamide 13 exhibited high cytotoxicity, while CC50 (50% cytotoxic concentration) of other compounds exceeded 32 μg ml−1 (Table 1). All tested compounds had no hemolytic activity against red blood cells at a dose of 32 μg ml−1, except compound 16 with a HC10 (10% hemolytic concentration) of 27 μg ml−1.

Therefore, given the combination of high activity and low cytotoxicity, the most promising compounds for further studies are trifluoroacetamide 14 for control of S. aureus and C. albicans and compound 17 as an antimycotic agent against C. neoformans.

At present, there is no literature data on potential targets associated with the antimicrobial properties of benzopentathiepines. While the antimicrobial properties of highly cytotoxic compounds, such as varacin 2, may be related to the ability of some pentathiepines to damage cellular DNA [28], other targets should be identified for non-toxic compounds.

To identify potential biotargets associated with the antibacterial activity of pentathiepines, we performed in silico prediction of their inhibitory activity levels against 43 different target proteins of S. aureus using the Microcosm BioS v18.1.9 system. The QSAR database of Microcosm BioS contains verified, structured, and processed information on the chemical structure and activity of 625,888 known compounds (derived from ChEMBL [29], BindingDB [30], and PubChem [31]) that have been screened by the world scientific community for 11,509 target biological activities (as of 04.11.2017). The QSAR database was formed using the Microcosm software [32]. The range of values for each activity type was divided into deciles. Each decile interval was assigned a fixed activity index value, from IndAct = −5 (inactive) to IndAct = +5 (highly active).

The spectrum of target activity levels for a new compound was predicted using the 2D structural similarity method. The Microcosm BioS program finds in the QSAR database a specified number of tested compounds (20 in this study) that are structurally most similar to the predicted molecule. All tested activities are listed for each found analogue, with an activity index value being indicated for each activity.

To assess proteins of S. aureus as relevant biotargets for the antimicrobial activity of benzopentathiepines 10 and 13–17, the total number of the nearest tested analogues for the five compounds (in comparison with QSAR database filling, ID is an identifier of protein in UniProtKB [33]) and the mean activity index value were determined for each target (Table 2).

Table 2 In silico prediction of an inhibitory activity for various protein-targets of Staphylococcus aureus

According to the calculation results, the most promising biotargets related to the antimicrobial activity of pentathiepines are DNA ligase and tRNAsynthetase (Phenylalanine-tRNA ligase). The last enzyme consists of two protein subunits: P68849 (Phenylalanine-tRNA ligase alpha subunit) and Q9AGR3 (Phenylalanine-tRNA ligase beta subunit) which are expressed by different genes. According to the prediction in Microcosm BioS, it is impossible to define exactly which of these two proteins could be affected by new substances. In addition, there are no experimental X-ray models of 3D structures for S. aureus for these proteins in PDB. Therefore, this hybrid target was excluded from further consideration.

Among 69 compounds tested for DNA ligase inhibition, 14 structural analogues of compounds 10 and 13–17 were found; their mean activity index was IndAct = 0.9, which was higher than the mean activity (IndAct = 0 corresponds to the median). The other analyzed biotargets were less promising because their mean activity indices were less than zero, from IndAct = –1.0 (less than the mean level) to IndAct = –4.0 (very low activity).

Bacterial DNA ligase is an NAD+-dependent enzyme involved in DNA replication [34]. Bacterial DNA ligase is essential for viability of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and is phylogenetically distinct from its human, ATP-dependent, counterpart [35]. These data indicate that bacterial DNA ligase is a promising target for new generation antibacterial drugs.

To simulate a potential mechanism of DNA ligase inhibition, molecular docking of compounds 10 and 13–19 into the adenosine monophosphate (AMP) binding site was done. Molecular modeling was performed with the Schrodinger Maestro visualization program using applications from the Schrodinger Small Molecule Drug Discovery Suite 2017–1 package [36]. Three-dimensional structures of the derivatives were obtained empirically in the LigPrep application using the OPLS3 force field [37]. All possible tautomeric forms of compounds, as well as various states of molecules in the pH range of 7.0 ± 2.0 were taken into account. A XRD model of the interaction between E. coli DNA ligase and a new compound from a series of 2-amino-[1, 8]-naphthyridine-3-carboxamides with PDB ID 4GLX (1.9 Å resolution) was chosen [38]. To model a possible mechanism of inhibition of selected target molecular docking of new compounds was performed at the binding site of AMP using Glide application [39]. The search area for docking (docking grid) was selected automatically, based on the size and physico-chemical properties of inhibitors from chosen XRD model. The extra precision (XP) algorithm of docking was applied. Docking was done in comparison with previously studied inhibitors 0XS and 0XT [38] as well as an AstraZeneca’s patented adenosine derivative AZ10 (Fig. 4) [40]. The three-dimensional structures of inhibitors were obtained in the PubChem database and prepared in the LigPrep application.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Structures of AMP and known bacterial DNA ligase inhibitors

The minimum binding energy values were found using the molecular docking procedure described above (Table 3).

Table 3 The values of the minimum binding energy of compounds with DNA ligase active site

As expected, adenosine monophosphate, being a natural ligase ligand, demonstrates the best estimated binding energy. In the used model, the adenosine derivative AZ10 is a synthetic ligand with the highest affinity. Interestingly, compound 16 exhibits an estimated binding energy very close to that of AZ10 and significantly higher than that of the reference ligand 0XS of the selected model. In general, all pentathiepine amides are characterized by estimated binding energies comparable to the energy obtained for 0XT. The lowest binding energies are predicted for lissoclinotoxin A (1) (Fig. 1) and amine 10.

Figure 5 shows features of non-covalent interactions of pentathiepines 16 and 17 in comparison with AZ10 and 0XS inhibitors.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Non-covalent interactions of compounds in the AMP binding site of bacterial DNA ligase: AAZ10; B16; C0XS; D17. The binding site surface is colored according to the degree of hydrophobicity. Non-covalent interactions are denoted by dashed lines: hydrogen bonds (green); π-system interactions (violet); interactions of sulfur atoms (yellow); halogen bonds (blue)

Known adenosine inhibitors form hydrogen bonds between heterocyclic and amino group nitrogens and amino acid residues Glu113, Leu114, Lys115, and Lys290 [38]. Stacking interactions between heterocyclic π-systems of inhibitors and the Tyr225 residue have an important coordinating function. The main difference in binding of new pentathiepines to the AMP binding site of DNA ligase is the absence of hydrogen bonds with 113–115 amino acid residues. However, there are possible stable interactions with the Tyr225 residue. Furthermore, compound 16 stacks with the residue similarly to the studied inhibitors and AMP, whereas compounds 15 and 17 form hydrogen bonds with a hydroxyl group of this amino acid residue. The Lys290 residue marked by the authors of a model [38] forms hydrogen bonds with compounds 15 and 16. It is also worth noting hydrogen bonds that may be formed by Leu80. The hydrogen bonds are formed both with AMP and with new tested compounds. In the case of 0XS, this residue is involved in the formation of a halogen bond with the inhibitor bromine atom. A feature of new compounds is active involvement of sulfur atoms of pentathiepine rings both in the formation of hydrogen bonds (with Arg171 for compounds 15 and 16) and in interactions with π-systems (all analyzed compounds).

In addition to the main AMP binding site, bacterial DNA ligase may have additional binding sites [41]. To examine possible binding of pentathiepine derivatives to alternative binding sites on the DNA ligase surface, an X-ray structural model (PDB ID 4GLX) was mapped using the CASTp 3.0 computational algorithm [42]. Then, sites were selected based on the criteria of at least one entrance and an internal volume exceeding 10 Å3. Molecular docking into the selected sites was done. The estimated binding energy (docking score) of all simulated compounds was found to be less than 5.7 kcal/mol (Tables S1S5, Supporting information), which excludes involvement of these sites in the action mechanism of studied compounds.

Therefore, bacterial DNA ligase is a potential target for new pentathiepine derivatives. At the same time, the lack of a clear correlation between the calculated data and antibacterial activity suggests that the studied compounds may have other targets.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we synthesized a number of substituted benzopentathiepin-6-amines and their analogues lacking a polysulfur ring. Parent amine 10 and amides 13–16 derived from it were highly active against Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus, MRSA strain). The most active compounds were acetamide 13 and trifluoroacetamide 14, with a MIC of 4 μg ml−1, which was four-fold higher than activity of the reference drug amoxicillin. The same compounds were most active against the C. albicans fungus (MIC of 1 to 2 μg ml−1). All amides comprising the benzopentathiepine backbone were active against the C. neoformans fungus; of these, the most effective compound was amide 17 was (MIC of 2 μg ml−1) containing a morpholine substituent and being four-fold more active than the reference drug fluconazole. Replacement of the pentathiepine ring with 1,3-dithiolan-2-one or 1,3-dithiolane moieties led to disappearance of the antimicrobial activity. All studied compounds had no hemolytic activity and, except acetamide 13, were low cytotoxic. Given the combination of high activity and low cytotoxicity, the most promising compounds for further research are trifluoroacetamide 14 as an agent to control S. aureus and C. albicans and compound 17 as an antimycotic agent against C. neoformans.

On the basis of the QSAR analysis and molecular docking data, bacterial DNA ligase might be one of the targets for antibacterial activity of new benzopentathiepines against S. aureus.

Experimental

General

Reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received. 8-(Trifluoromethyl)benzo[f][1–5]pentathiepin-6-amine 10 and amides 13, 14 were synthesized in accordance with [15]. Compounds 1517 were synthesized as described in [20].

GC-MS: Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph equipped with a quadrupole mass spectrometer Agilent 5975C as a detector; quartz column HP-5MS (copolymer 5%–diphenyl–95%–dimethylsiloxane) of 30 m length, internal diameter 0.25 mm and stationary phase film thickness 0.25 µm. 1H and 13C NMR: Bruker DRX-500 apparatus at 500.13 MHz (1H) and 125.76 MHz (13C), J in Hz; structure determinations by analyzing the 1H NMR spectra, including 1H–1H double resonance spectra, J-modulated 13C NMR spectra (JMOD), 13C NMR spectra using proton off-resonance saturation and at times 13C – 1H 2D heteronuclear correlation long-range spin-spin coupling constants (COLOC, 2,3J(C,H) = 10 Hz). HR-MS: DFS Thermo Scientific spectrometer in a full scan mode (15–500 m/z, 70 eV electron impact ionization, direct sample administration).

6-(Trifluoromethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dithiol-4-amine (21)

(A) Et3N (0.15 g, 1.5 mmol) was added with stirring to the solution of compound 10 (0.44 g, 1.38 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (7 ml). The mixture was stirred for 10 days at room temperature. Then water (8 ml) and CH2Cl2 (2 ml) were added to the reaction mixture. The products were extracted by CH2Cl2, dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was distilled off, and the residue was separated by column chromatography: silica gel (SiO2; 60–200 μ; Macherey-Nagel); hexane/benzene (1:1), CH2Cl2. Amine 21 (0.118 g, yield 51%, calculated on consumed 10 (conversion 70%)).

(B) NaBH4 (0.127 g, 3.36 mmol) was added with stirring to the solution of compound 10 (0.155 g, 0.49 mmol) in THF (5 ml) and EtOH (2 ml). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, then CH2Cl2 (1 ml) was added. The mixture was stirred for 5 days at room temperature. Then water (4 ml) and CH2Cl2 (2 ml) were added to the reaction mixture. The products were extracted by CH2Cl2, dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was distilled off, and the residue was separated by column chromatography: silica gel (SiO2; 60–200 μ; Macherey-Nagel); hexane/benzene (1: 1), CH2Cl2. Amine 21 (0.089 g, yield 77%). HRMS: 235.9809 [M-H]+; calcd. 235.9810 (C8H5NF3S2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.82 (br s, NH2), 4.34 (s, 2H-3), 6.60 (d q, H-7, J7,5 1.5 Hz, J7,F = 0.7 Hz), 6.89 (d q, H-5, J5,7 1.5 Hz, J5,F 0.7 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.12 (s, C-1), 126.10 (s, C-2), 36.42 (t, C-3), 140.27 (s, C-4), 109.39 (C-5, 3JC,F 4.0 Hz), 129.36 (C-6, 2JC,F 32.7 Hz), 109.10 (C-7, 3JC,F 4.0 Hz), 123.74 (C-8, 1JC,F 272.0 Hz).

2,2,2-Trifluoro-N-(2-oxo-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dithiol-4-yl)acetamide (18)

(CF3CO)2O (0.1 ml, 0.72 mmol) was added with stirring to the solution of compound 20 (0.072 g, 0.29 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 ml). The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The solvent was distilled off to give 0.085 g (84%) 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-(2-oxo-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dithiol-4-yl)acetamide 18. M.p.: 187 °C. HRMS: 346.9499 [M]+; calcd. 346.9504 (C10H3O2NS2F6). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 + CD3OD) δ 7.64 (br s, H-7), 7.68 (d q, H-5, J5,7 1.7 Hz, J5,F 0.7 Hz). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3 + CD3OD) δ 134.53 (s, C-1), 129.93 (s, C-2), 186.68 (s, C-3), 133.10 (s, C-4), 118.33 (C-5, 3JC,F 3.8 Hz), 129.78 (C-6, 2JC,F 34.2 Hz), 120.87 (C-7, 3JC,F 3.8 Hz), 122.71 (C-8, 1JC,F 272.8 Hz), 155.72 (C-9, 2JC,F 38.7 Hz), 115.46 (C-10, 1JC,F 287.9 Hz).

2,2,2-Trifluoro-N-(6-(trifluoromethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dithiol-4-yl)acetamide (19)

(CF3CO)2O (0.25 ml, 1.79 mmol) was added with stirring to the solution of compound 21 (0.170 g, 0.72 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 ml). The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The solvent was distilled off to give 0.229 g (95%) 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-(6-(trifluoromethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dithiol-4-yl)acetamide 19. M.p.: 136 °C. HRMS: 331.9631 [M-H]+; calcd. 331.9633 (C10H4O1N1F6S2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.62 (s, 2H-3), 7.33 (br s, H-5), 7.62 (br s, NH), 7.87 (br s, H-7). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3) δ 129.74 (s, C-1), 135.16 (s, C-2), 37.06 (t, C-3), 141.77 (s, C-4), 116.79 and 116.99 (C-5, C-7, 3JC,F 3.9 Hz), 129.53 (C-6, 2JC,F 33.5 Hz), 123.09 (C-8, 1JC,F 272.5 Hz), 154.86 (C-9, 2JC,F 38.1 Hz), 115.31 (C-10, 1JC,F 288.7 Hz).

Biology

Antimicrobial screening was performed by CO-ADD (The Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery), Australia [23].

Antibacterial assay

Procedure

All bacteria (S. aureus (Strain ATCC 43300, MRSA), E. coli (Strain ATCC 25922, FDA control strain), K. pneumoniae (Strain ATCC 700603, MDR), A. baumannii (Strain ATCC 19606, Type strain), P. aeruginosa (Strain ATCC 27853, Quality control strain) were cultured in Cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (CAMHB) at 37 °C overnight. A sample of each culture was then diluted 40-fold in fresh broth and incubated at 37 °C for 1.5–3 h. The resultant mid-log phase cultures were diluted (CFU/ml measured by OD600), then added to each well of the compound containing plates, giving a cell density of 5 × 105 CFU/ml and a total volume of 50 μl. All the plates were covered and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h without shaking.

Analysis

Inhibition of bacterial growth was determined measuring absorbance at 600 nm (OD600), using a Tecan M1000 Pro monochromator plate reader. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each well, using the negative control (media only) and positive control (bacteria without inhibitors) on the same plate as references.

The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each well, using the negative control (media only) and positive control (bacteria without inhibitors) on the same plate. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration at which the growth was fully inhibited, defined by an inhibition ≥80%.

The results are listed in the Table 1.

Antifungal assay

Procedure

Fungi strains (C. albicans (Strain ATCC 90028, CLSI reference, C. albicans) and C. neoformans (Strain ATCC 208821, H99 Type strain, C. neoformans)), were cultured for 3 days on Yeast Extract-Peptone Dextrose (YPD) agar at 30 °C. A yeast suspension of 1 × 106 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml (as determined by OD530) was prepared from five colonies. The suspension was subsequently diluted and added to each well of the compound-containing plates giving a final cell density of fungi suspension of 2.5 × 103 CFU/ml and a total volume of 50 μl. All plates were covered and incubated at 35 °C for 36 h without shaking.

Analysis

Growth inhibition of C. albicans was determined measuring absorbance at 630 nm (OD630), while the growth inhibition of C. neoformans was determined measuring the difference in absorbance between 600 and 570 nm (OD600–570), after the addition of resazurin (0.001% final concentration) and incubation at 35 °C for 2 h. The absorbance was measured using a Biotek Multiflo Synergy HTX plate reader.

In both cases, the percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each well, using the negative control (media only) and positive control (fungi without inhibitors) on the same plate. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration at which the growth was fully inhibited, defined by an inhibition ≥80% for C. albicans and an inhibition ≥70% for C. neoformans. Due to a higher variance in growth and inhibition, a lower threshold was applied to the data for C. neoformans.

The results are listed in the Table 1.

Cytotoxicity assay

Procedure

HEK293 cells were counted manually in a Neubauer haemocytometer and then plated in the 384-well plates containing the compounds to give a density of 6000 cells/well in a final volume of 50 μl. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was used as growth media and the cells were incubated together with the compounds for 20 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

Analysis

Cytotoxicity (or cell viability) was measured by fluorescence, ex: 560/10 nm, em: 590/10 nm (F560/590), after addition of 5 μl of 25 μg ml−1 Resazurin (2.3 μg ml−1 final concentration) and after incubation for further 3 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The fluorescence intensity was measured using a Tecan M1000 Pro monochromator plate reader, using automatic gain calculation

CC50 (concentration at 50% cytotoxicity) were calculated by curve fitting the inhibition values vs. log(concentration) using sigmoidal dose-response function, with variable fitting values for bottom, top and slope.