Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa conditioning is associated with favorable outcomes in myelofibrosis

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative therapy for myelofibrosis. The optimal conditioning regimen has not been well defined. We retrospectively compared transplantation outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (n = 67) conditioned with myeloablative (MAC, 36%) and reduced-intensity (RIC, 46%) regimens, and more recently with the combination of thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF, 18%). Patients were transplanted from HLA-matched sibling (n = 26) or unrelated donors (n = 41) between the years 2003 and 2018. The median follow-up was 2.9 years for all patients but shorter in the TBF group (1.1 years). The probability of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 43%. At 1 year, the rate of PFS was 80%, 54%, and 45% with TBF, MAC, and RIC, respectively (p = 0.031). In a multivariable model, there was a greater risk for death with MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 12.26, p = 0.026) and lower PFS with both MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 7.78, p = 0.017) and RIC (HR 5.43, p = 0.027) compared with TBF. Relapse was higher with RIC (HR 8.20, p = 0.043) while nonrelapse mortality was increased with MAC (HR 9.63 p = 0.049). Our results indicate that TBF is a promising preparative regimen in myelofibrosis patients transplanted from matched sibling or unrelated donors, and should be further explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tefferi A. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. New Engl J Med. 2000;342:1255–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:787–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, Niederwieser D, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroger N, Giorgino T, Scott BL, Ditschkowski M, Alchalby H, Cervantes F, et al. Impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on survival of patients less than 65 years of age with primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125:3347–50. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-10-608315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, George G, Begna K, Schwager S, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Gangat N, Ketterling RP, Pardanani A, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guardiola P, Anderson JE, Bandini G, Cervantes F, Runde V, Arcese W, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle, Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto del Midollo Osseo, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Collaborative Study. Blood. 1999;93:2831–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerbauy DM, Gooley TA, Sale GE, Flowers ME, Doney KC, Georges GE, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for idiopathic myelofibrosis, advanced polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:355–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mesa RA, Silverstein MN, Jacobsen SJ, Wollan PC, Tefferi A. Population-based incidence and survival figures in essential thrombocythemia and agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: an Olmsted County Study, 1976-1995. Am J Hematol. 1999;61:10–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kroger N, Holler E, Kobbe G, Bornhauser M, Schwerdtfeger R, Baurmann H, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2009;114:5264–70. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-07-234880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Isola L, Price LS, Shore TB, Boyer M, et al. MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124:1183–91. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-04-572545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta V, Malone AK, Hari PN, Ahn KW, Hu ZH, Gale RP, et al. Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a cohort analysis from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain T, Kunze KL, Temkit M, Partain DK, Patnaik MS, Slack JL, et al. Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54:204–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0226-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanz J, Boluda JC, Martin C, Gonzalez M, Ferra C, Serrano D, et al. Single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors in patients with hematological malignancy using busulfan, thiotepa, fludarabine and ATG as myeloablative conditioning regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;47:1287–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruggeri A, Sanz G, Bittencourt H, Sanz J, Rambaldi A, Volt F, et al. Comparison of outcomes after single or double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia using different types of myeloablative conditioning regimen, a retrospective study on behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT. Leukemia. 2014;28:779–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giannotti F, Labopin M, Shouval R, Sanz J, Arcese W, Angelucci E, et al. Haploidentical transplantation is associated with better overall survival when compared to single cord blood transplantation: an EBMT-Eurocord study of acute leukemia patients conditioned with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0655-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Bartolomeo P, Santarone S, De Angelis G, Picardi A, Cudillo L, Cerretti R, et al. Haploidentical, unmanipulated, G-CSF-primed bone marrow transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2013;121:849–57. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-08-453399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raiola AM, Dominietto A, Ghiso A, Di Grazia C, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, et al. Unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:117–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saraceni F, Labopin M, Hamladji RM, Mufti G, Socie G, Shimoni A, et al. Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Oncotarget. 2018;9:3379–93. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saraceni F, Beohou E, Labopin M, Arcese W, Bonifazi F, Stepensky P, et al. Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:1211–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1628–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

  26. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:945–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, Kröger N, ediotrs. The EBMT handbook: hematopoietic stem cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. Springer; 2019.

  28. Dulery R, Bastos J, Paviglianiti A, Malard F, Brissot E, Battipaglia G, et al. Thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine conditioning regimen in T cell-replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:1407–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.02.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patriarca F, Masciulli A, Bacigalupo A, Bregante S, Pavoni C, Finazzi MC, et al. Busulfan- or thiotepa-based conditioning in myelofibrosis: a phase ii multicenter randomized study from the GITMO Group. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ballen KK, Shrestha S, Sobocinski KA, Zhang MJ, Bashey A, Bolwell BJ, et al. Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:358–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bregante S, Dominietto A, Ghiso A, Raiola AM, Gualandi F, Varaldo R, et al. Improved outcome of alternative donor transplantations in patients with myelofibrosis: from unrelated to haploidentical family donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:324–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Raj K, Eikema DJ, McLornan DP, Olavarria E, Blok HJ, Bregante S, et al. Family mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: report from the chronic malignancies working party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McClune BL, Weisdorf DJ, Pedersen TL, Tunes da Silva G, Tallman MS, Sierra J, et al. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1878–87. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4821

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Blaise D, Devillier R, Lecoroller-Sorriano AG, Boher JM, Boyer-Chammard A, Tabrizi R, et al. Low non-relapse mortality and long-term preserved quality of life in older patients undergoing matched related donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a prospective multicenter phase II trial. Haematologica. 2015;100:269–74. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.113571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Versluis J, Labopin M, Niederwieser D, Socie G, Schlenk RF, Milpied N, et al. Prediction of non-relapse mortality in recipients of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation with AML in first complete remission. Leukemia. 2015;29:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cornelissen JJ, Blaise D. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with AML in first complete remission. Blood. 2016;127:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-07-604546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The Varda and Boaz Dotan Research Center in Hemato-Oncology affiliated with the Cancer Biology Research Center—Tel Aviv University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roni Shouval.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Senior authors: Arnon Nagler, Avichai Shimoni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shouval, R., Vega, Y., Fein, J.A. et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa conditioning is associated with favorable outcomes in myelofibrosis. Bone Marrow Transplant 55, 147–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0653-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0653-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links