Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Patient-provider communications about pharmacogenomic results increase patient recall of medication changes

Abstract

Effective doctor–patient communication is critical for disease management, especially when considering genetic information. We studied patient-provider communications after implementing a point-of-care pharmacogenomic results delivery system to understand whether pharmacogenomic results are discussed and whether medication recall is impacted. Outpatients undergoing preemptive pharmacogenomic testing (cases), non-genotyped controls, and study providers were surveyed from October 2012–May 2017. Patient responses were compared between visits where pharmacogenomic results guided prescribing versus visits where pharmacogenomics did not guide prescribing. Provider knowledge of pharmacogenomics, before and during study participation, was also analyzed. Both providers and case patients frequently reported discussions of genetic results after visits where pharmacogenomic information guided prescribing. Importantly, medication changes from visits where pharmacogenomics influenced prescribing were more often recalled than non-pharmacogenomic guided medication changes (OR = 3.3 [1.6–6.7], p = 0.001). Case patients who had separate visits where pharmacogenomics did and did not, respectively, influence prescribing more often remembered medication changes from visits where genomic-based guidance was used (OR = 3.4 [1.2–9.3], p = 0.02). Providers also displayed dramatic increases in personal genomic understanding through program participation (94% felt at least somewhat informed about pharmacogenomics post-participation, compared to 61% at baseline, p = 0.04). Using genomic information during prescribing increases patient-provider communications, patient medication recall, and provider understanding of genomics, important ancillary benefits to clinical use of pharmacogenomics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor–patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010;10:38–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Doctor–patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17:351–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herndon JH, Pollick KJ. Continuing concerns, new challenges, and next steps in physician–patient communication. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84-A:309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47:826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, Cole-Kelly K, Frankel R, Buffone N, et al. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med. 2004;79:495–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tongue JR, Epps HR, Forese LL. Communication skills. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:3–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taran S. An examination of the factors contributing to poor communication outside the physician–patient sphere. Mcgill J Med. 2011;13:86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson IB, Schoen C, Neuman P, Strollo MK, Rogers WH, Chang H, et al. Physician–patient communication about prescription medication nonadherence: a 50-state study of America’s seniors. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:6–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tarn DM, Heritage J, Paterniti DA, Hays RD, Kravitz RL, Wenger NS. Prescribing new medications: a taxonomy of physician–patient communication. Commun Med. 2008;5:195–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:791–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKillip RP, Borden BA, Galecki P, Ham SA, Patrick-Miller L, Hall JP, et al. Patient perceptions of care as influenced by a large institutional pharmacogenomic implementation program. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2016;102:106–114.

  13. McKinnon RA, Ward MB, Sorich MJ. A critical analysis of barriers to the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:751–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, Roden DM, Williams MS, Wilson R, et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med. 2013;15:258–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Haga SB, Mills R, Bosworth H. Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97:10–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sweet K, Sturm AC, Schmidlen T, Hovick S, Peng J, Manickam K, et al. EMR documentation of physician-patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomic results. Clin Genet. 2017;91:545–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haga SB, LaPointe NM. The potential impact of pharmacogenetic testing on medication adherence. Pharm J. 2013;13:481–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grant RW, Hivert M, Pandiscio JC, Florez JC, Nathan DM, Meigs JB. The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: a patient and physician survey. Diabetologia. 2009;52:2299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li JH, Joy SV, Haga SB, Orlando LA, Kraus WE, Ginsburg GS, et al. Genetically guided statin therapy on statin perceptions, adherence, and cholesterol lowering: a pilot implementation study in primary care patients. J Pers Med. 2014;4:147–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Charland SL, Agatep BC, Herrera V, Schrader B, Frueh FW, Ryvkin M, et al. Providing patients with pharmacogenetic test results affects adherence to statin therapy: results of the Additional KIF6 Risk Offers Better Adherence to Statins (AKROBATS) trial. Pharm J. 2014;14:272–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Donnell PH, Wadhwa N, Danahey K, Borden BA, Lee SM, Hall JP, et al. Pharmacogenomics-based point-of-care clinical decision support significantly alters drug prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;102:859–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Donnell PH, Danahey K, Jacobs M, Wadhwa NR, Yuen S, Bush A, et al. Adoption of a clinical pharmacogenomics implementation program during outpatient care--initial results of the University of Chicago “1,200 Patients Project”. Am J Med Genet C. 2014;166C:68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Donnell PH, Bush A, Spitz J, Danahey K, Saner D, Das S, et al. The 1200 patients project: creating a new medical model system for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92:446–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hussain S, Kenigsberg BB, Danahey K, Lee YM, Galecki PM, Ratain MJ, et al. Disease-drug database for pharmacogenomic-based prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:179–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Danahey K, Borden BA, Furner B, Yukman P, Hussain S, Saner D, et al. Simplifying the use of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice: building the genomic prescribing system. J Biomed Inform. 2017;75:110–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burke W, Emery J. Genetics education for primary-care providers. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:561–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharp RR, Goldlust ME, Eng C. Addressing gaps in physician education using personal genomic testing. Genet Med. 2011;13:750–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Unertl KM, Field JR, Price L, Peterson JF. Clinician perspectives on using pharmacogenomics in clinical practice. Per Med. 2015;12:339–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Haga SB, Burke W, Ginsburg GS, Mills R, Agans R. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet. 2012;82:388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, Dimatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1:189–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kravitz RL, Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, DiMatteo MR, Rogers WH, Ordway L, et al. Recall of recommendations and adherence to advice among patients with chronic medical conditions. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1869–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16:e12454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KA, Khalid M, Patel A, Verbrugge RR, et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:450–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter H. O’Donnell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

KD, MJR, and PHO are named as co-inventors on a pending patent application for the Genomic Prescribing System. MJR is a co-inventor holding patents related to pharmacogenetic diagnostics and receives royalties related to UGT1A1 genotyping, although no royalties were received from the genotyping performed in this study. MJR work has been funded by the NIH, The Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society for Clinical Oncology, and The William F. O'Connor Foundation. PHO work has been funded by the NIH, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Chicago Bucksbaum Institute for Clinical Excellence, and the Central Society for Clinical and Translational Research. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borden, B.A., Lee, S.M., Danahey, K. et al. Patient-provider communications about pharmacogenomic results increase patient recall of medication changes. Pharmacogenomics J 19, 528–537 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-019-0076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-019-0076-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links