Correction to: Spinal Cord 57:49–57;
published online 11 September 2018
In the original version of the article the authors incorrectly stated that: “One case study provided evidence of some improvements in motor performance and spasticity [19], while several other studies only provided evidence on the feasibility of UER as an assessment tool; however, the fact that the manufacturer funded these studies lessens their objectivity [15, 20–24].” This is not correct as the manufacturers did not fund the studies. The correct phrase therefore should have read: “One case study provided evidence of some improvements in motor performance and spasticity [19], while several other studies provided evidence focusing more on the feasibility of UER rather than the clinical efficacy [15, 20–24].” The authors would like to apologise for this error.
This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Lee, B.S., Lee, HJ. et al. Correction: Clinical efficacy of upper limb robotic therapy in people with tetraplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord 57, 255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0247-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0247-7