Abstract
Hard X-ray phase-contrast imaging is sensitive to density variation in objects and shows a dose advantage for in vivo observation over absorption-contrast imaging. We examined the capability of propagation-based phase-contrast tomography (PB-PCT) with single-distance phase retrieval for tracking of bone structure and mineral changes using monochromatic synchrotron light. Female mice underwent ovariectomy and drill-hole surgery in the right tibial diaphysis and were divided into two groups: OVX and OVX-E (nā=ā6 each); the latter group was treated with intraperitoneal administration of 14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (14,15-EET) for promoting bone repair. Age-matched mice subjected to sham ovariectomy and drill-hole surgery (Sham) were also prepared (nā=ā6). In vivo CT scans of the drilled defect were acquired 3, 7, and 11 days after surgery, and tomographic images were matched by three-dimensional registration between successive time points for monitoring the process of defect filling. In addition, using absorption-contrast CT as the reference method, the validity of PB-PCT was evaluated in one mouse by comparing images of tibial metaphyseal bone between the two methods in terms of bone geometry as well as the measure of mineralization. Although phase retrieval is strictly valid only for single-material objects, PB-PCT, with its lower radiation dose, could provide a depiction of bone structure similar to that from absorption-contrast CT. There was a significant correlation of linear absorption coefficients between the two methods, indicating the possibility of a rough estimate of the measure of mineralization by PB-PCT. Indeed, delayed bone regeneration (OVX vs. Sham) and the efficacy of 14,15-EET for improving osteoporotic bone repair (OVX-E vs. OVX) could be detected in both bone volume and mineralization by PB-PCT. Thus, in combination with single-distance phase retrieval, PB-PCT would have great potential for providing a valuable tool to track changes in bone structure and mineralization, and for evaluating the effects of therapeutic interventions as well.
Introduction
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is most frequently used for the measurement of bone microarchitecture, allowing the assessment of its strength or the efficacy of treatments [1]. More sophisticated imaging has lowered the barriers for its application to in vivo bone imaging, especially in rodent models. In vivo CT was first introduced by Kinney et al. [2] for imaging of rat trabecular bone using monochromatic synchrotron light, and thereafter, laboratory in vivo CT came into widespread use for bone structural analysis [3].
The use of in vivo CT with either synchrotron radiation or micro-focused X-ray sources enables tracking of 3D bone structure in the same animal, which increases the ability to detect causal relationships and reduces the number of animals needed. High-resolution in vivo CT allows for tracking local bone dynamics and identifying the loci of bone formation and resorption at the single-trabeculum level [4,5,6,7]. Computational biomechanical analyses also demonstrate that monitoring of bone structural changes over a long period of time may provide valuable information for predicting fracture risk and treatment planning [8, 9].
These advantages of in vivo CT are, however, not available without limitations. Repeated scanning results in increased total dose, possibly exerting a substantial impact on bone turnover [10, 11]. Reducing the total dose is not difficult, but there is a trade-off between radiation dose and spatial resolution or image quality. Far from absorption edges, the dose is inversely proportional to the fourth power of voxel size when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is kept constant; while SNR is linearly related to the square root of dose under the same resolution [12, 13]. Thus, in vivo CT with high-resolution inevitably exposes bone and surrounding tissues to high doses of radiation.
Increasing the dose efficiency by exploiting the X-ray phase shift or refraction could be a promising way to reduce the dose in X-ray imaging. The X-ray refractive index nn, characterizing the optical properties of the material is expressed as nā=ā1āāāĪ“ā+āiĪ², in which Ī“ and Ī² characterize the phase shifting and absorption properties of the material, respectively. There is little practical difference in Ī² between soft tissues and water (~10ā10). That is, soft tissues are almost transparent to hard X-rays and their absorption contrast is almost invisible. In contrast, Ī“ is typically three orders of magnitude larger than Ī², and therefore, the phase shift-based contrast is excellent even in imaging of soft tissues in which the different components show almost negligible, as well as too similar, absorption to be discriminated [14]. Bone is much less transparent than soft tissues, and conventional absorption-contrast CT works well in bone imaging. However, Ī“ is still larger than Ī² in bone (e.g., Ī“/Ī²ā=ā300ā900 for cortical bone over 20ā40ākeV) [15], and thus, phase shift-based CT may also have a significant dose advantage over absorption-contrast CT in bone imaging.
Several techniques have been developed, such as propagation-, analyzer-, and interferometry-based imaging methods, to visualize the X-ray phase shift [15, 16]. Among these, single-distance propagation-based imaging [17, 18], which requires no specific optics system and needs only a single X-ray image per projection angle for tomographic reconstruction, is the simplest and favorable way to reduce dose. By taking a certain distance between an object and the detector, a monochromatic X-ray beam with a plane-wave front can generate the transmission images that contain contrast from attenuation and phase shift through Fresnel diffraction yielded through the object. These images are often processed by a phase retrieval algorithm prior to tomographic reconstruction. Phase retrieval leads to high-contrast visualization with tolerance to noise [19,20,21], thereby allowing simple thresholding to be used in segmentation of tomographic image volumes. Several studies have proven the benefits of propagation-based imaging with single-distance phase retrieval in CT of bone and other biological tissues [22,23,24,25,26,27]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has explored its potential for CT tracking of local changes in bone architecture over time.
We tested the feasibility and validity of propagation-based imaging with single-distance phase retrieval in CT tracking of bone microstructure. Synchrotron radiation, providing a high-flux, monochromatic X-ray beam with a high degree of transverse coherence, was employed for single-distance propagation-based imaging, and the process of bone-defect repair in osteoporotic mice and the effect of a promoter of organ regeneration (14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET)) [28] on it were monitored. Comparison was also made between tomographic images obtained via propagation-based imaging with single-distance phase retrieval and conventional absorption imaging; the latter imaging is superior in terms of mineral quantitation [5, 29].
Materials and methods
Experiments were carried out at the Experimental Animal Facility and Biomedical Imaging Center of the SR facility āSuper Photon ring-8GeV (SPring-8)ā in Japan. The protocol of the animal treatment was in accordance with the guiding principles of the American Physiological Society and with the approval of the Animal Research Committee of Tokushima University and Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute.
Animal preparation
Female C57BL/6 mice, with either bilateral ovariectomies (nā=ā12) or sham-operated (nā=ā6) at the age of 11 weeks, were purchased from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). Rodent models of postmenopausal osteoporosis following ovariectomy have been widely used as a model of impaired fracture healing [30, 31]. Mice were single-housed in a plastic cage under controlled conditions (12-h light/dark cycle, 25āĀ°C, 60% humidity) and allowed free access to a standard diet (CLEA Japan) and tap water.
At the age of 12 weeks, the mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, and the skin over the medial aspect of the right lower leg was shaved, swabbed with povidone iodine, and incised. A full-thickness unicortical hole through the upper tibial diaphyseal cortex was created ~3āmm proximal to the tibio-fibular junction using a 0.5-mm diameter drill rotating at 11,000ārpm (Muromachi Kikai, Kyoto, Japan). Drill margins were frequently irrigated with saline to avoid thermal necrosis, and the drill hole was rinsed with a flushing syringe to discard bone fragments. After arrest of bleeding from the bone marrow, the skin was sutured and swabbed with povidone again.
Immediately after the drill-hole surgery, the mice were implanted intraperitoneally with a mini-osmotic pump (Alzet model 1002; Cupertino, California, USA). The pump was filled with 14,15-EET, purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) or with vehicle (ethanol). Half of the post-ovariectomy mice (OVXā+āE, nā=ā6) received 14,15-EET at a dose of 15āĀµg/kg/d [28]. The remaining ovariectomized mice (OVX, nā=ā6) and the sham-operated mice (Sham, nā=ā6) received only the delivery of vehicle at an equal volume rate. We administered 14,15-EET in anticipation of improving the defect repair in OVX [30, 31] via its capability to stimulate angiogenesis [32], which is essential for bone healing [33] but reduced in OVX [31]. Soon after they recovered from the general anesthesia, all mice moved around normally.
Propagation-based imaging and CT scanning in vivo
The drill-hole healing was observed in the experimental hutch 3 (25āĀ±ā1āĀ°C) of beamline 20B2 at the SPring-8 synchrotron radiation source (Harima, Japan). A bending magnet source with a Si(111) double-crystal monochromator, located ~210ām upstream of the hutch, provided a 300āmm (horizontal)āĆā20 mm (vertical) monochromatic X-ray beam for projecting the image of objects onto the detector [34]. The incident X-ray energy was set at 33.4ākeV. In a study of in vivo phase-contrast CT for rat bone imaging [25], the energy of 37ākeV proved feasible. Instead, we chose the energy immediately above the k-edge of iodine. The vertical beam size of the incident X-ray was reduced to 2āmm by a slit built into the beamline end.
We used a visible light conversion type X-ray detector composed of a scientific CMOS (sCMOS) camera (C11440-22CU; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) and a beam monitor (BM2; Hamamatsu Photonics) with a 10-Āµm-thick phosphor screen (Gd2O2S:Tb+). The effective pixel size and field of view were 6.54āĀµm and 13.4āmm (horizontal)āĆā2.0 mm (vertical), respectively. The distance between the irradiated hindlimb and the detector (R) was set to 60ācm for propagation-based imaging. With this setting, the minimal Fresnel number (d2/Ī»R) [21] and the width of the first Fresnel zone (\(\sqrt {\lambda R/M}\)) [35] were 1.92 and 4.72āĀµm, respectively, where d is the characteristic size of the smallest discernible features in the object, Ī» (3.71āĆā10ā9 cm here) is the X-ray wavelength, and M is the geometric magnification, being ā1 for the plane-wave X-ray. Here, we equated d with the pixel size.
On days 3, 7, and 11 after drill-hole surgery, each mouse was anesthetized by the intraperitoneal administration of pentobarbital sodium and immobilized on a stack of computer-controlled precision stages for CT scanning. The forelimbs and the intact hindlimb were secured with surgical tape in the supine position, and the other hindlimb that had undergone the drill-hole surgery was stretched vertically and fixed to an acrylic supporting strut using surgical tape. This posture ensured a roughly proper placement of the drill hole for scanning within the limited area of irradiation. Experimental setup is shown in Fig.Ā 1.
After fine-tuning the vertical position of the drill hole, CT scanning was carried out with propagation-based imaging. We first acquired 30 images each of the sCMOS dark current and direct beam; subsequently, 600 drill-hole images over an angular range of 180Ā° in 0.3Ā° steps and 30 images of the direct beam were then acquired. The exposure time per projection angle was set to 100 msec. The dose per scan, measured using an ionization chamber (S-1194A1; Ohyo Koken Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan), amounted to 2.0āGy.
Single-distance phase retrieval and image reconstruction
Following correction for the dark current and normalization with the direct beam images, the bone images were processed by phase retrieval for generating contact images, which could serve as an equivalent to the images of transmission X-ray intensity taken with the object as close as possible to the detector. We used a well-accepted approach for phase retrieval, originally derived by Paganin et al. [17] on the basis of the transport of intensity equation [36] for a paraxial monochromatic wavefield, assuming that an irradiated object is homogeneous (Ī“/Ī²ā=āĪ³ā=āconstant). This method is available to the objects with nonnegligible absorption like bone tissues. Under the near field approximation [21], the following equation can be obtained using the transport of intensity equation with the z axis in the direction of the incident X-rays:
here, \(I_0\left( {{\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot } \right)\) and \(I_R\left( {{\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot } \right)\) are distributions of X-ray intensity at zā=ā0 (contact image) and at zā=āR (propagation-based image), respectively; \({\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot = (x,y)\) is the position vector lying in the plane perpendicular to the z axis; \(\nabla _ \bot\) is the gradient operator in the plane containing \({\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot\); and k (=2Ļ/Ī») is the wavenumber. EquationĀ 1 can be solved for \(I_0\left( {{\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot } \right)\) as
where \({\cal{F}}\) and \({\cal{F}}^{ - 1}\) are the two-dimensional (2D) forward and inverse Fourier transforms with respect to \({\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot\), and \({\mathbf{k}}_ \bot = (k_x,k_y)\) is the Fourier coordinate corresponding to \({\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot\). Thus, \(I_0\left( {{\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot } \right)\) can be obtained from \(I_R\left( {{\boldsymbol{r}}_ \bot } \right)\) measured by the detector placed at zā=āR.
In homogeneous objects, both Ī“ and Ī² could be considered proportional to electron density when X-ray energies are well away from the absorption edges of the object; thus, the assumption of constant Ī³ is feasible. However, the present object is composed of bone and soft tissues, and furthermore, the bone tissue itself is an approximately three-component composite material comprising hydroxyapatite-like mineral, organic constituents (mainly collagen fibrils), and water. Thus, Ī³ varies from region to region, and in accordance with the degree of deviation of Ī³ from the assumed constant Ī³ value, Eq.Ā 2 yields some errors. Nevertheless, in practice, this method shows substantial tolerance to violation of the constant Ī³ assumption and its feasibility at least for 3D structure analysis [37]. The method has already demonstrated its high potential for various biological objects comprising different materials, including air, interstitial fluid, soft tissue, and bone [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
The term \((\gamma R|{\mathbf{k}}_ \bot |^2/2k + 1)^{ - 1}\) in Eq.Ā 2 is considered as a Lorentzian low-pass filter, and Ī³ could be viewed as the filtering parameter, modulating the level of image noise and the blurring at tissue interfaces. Using the Ī³ value of bone causes over-smoothing artifact in reconstructing the bone boundary because of soft tissue (mostly muscle and marrow tissues) surrounding the bone tissue. The suitable Ī³ for reconstructing the bone/soft-tissue interface may be given by (Ī“bāāāĪ“s)/(Ī²bāāāĪ²s) [38, 39], where the subscripts b and s denote bone and soft tissues, respectively. Approximating the values of Ī“b and Ī²b using the values of fully-mineralized bone, composed of 50% hydroxyapatite, 40% collagen, and 10% water by volume, and the values of Ī“s and Ī²s using those of water, we used Eq.Ā 2 with Ī³ā=ā3.34āĆā102 in the present study (for details, see the Supplementary material).
Tomographic reconstruction from a series of contact images generated by single-distance phase retrieval, here referred to as propagation-based phase-contrast CT (PB-PCT), was made using a 2D filtered back-projection algorithm. The contiguous sections containing the drill hole were composed of 6.54-Āµm cubic voxels with a resolution of 8-bit gray scale proportional to the linear absorption coefficient Ī¼ (cmā1). All reconstructed images were redigitized such that Ī¼ā=ā0.0106āĆāgray value (0.0ācmā1āā¤āĪ¼āā¤ā2.7ācmā1).
PB-PCT versus absorption-contrast CT
When using a monochromatic X-ray, absorption-contrast CT is of great advantage when translating its reconstructed image into the distribution of Ī¼. For comparison of CT quantitation, in one mouse from the sham-ovariectomized group, the proximal right tibial region was scanned in vivo by the same system as that used for bone-defect imaging, setting the object-to-detector distance to 60 and 10ācm for PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT, respectively. The energy of synchrotron light, the exposure time per projection angle, the method for tomographic reconstruction, and the gray-level normalization were the same as those used in bone-defect imaging. In absorption-contrast CT, 1800 projections were collected in 0.1Ā° increments to increase the quality of the tomographic images, resulting in a total surface dose of 6āGy/scan, three times higher than that in PB-PCT.
For quantitative evaluation of mineralization, capillary tubes containing K2HPO4 water solution at various concentrations were scanned by absorption-contrast CT in the same manner as the animal imaging, and the relation between the solution density and Ī¼ was determined. Here, it is assumed that bone tissue is uniform and that its absorption can be represented by a two-phase mixture of hydroxyapatite and other light elements, replaced by K2HPO4 and water, respectively [5, 29]. Thus, the K2HPO4 solution could serve as a bone phantom and its density is considered as the measure of apparent mineralization. The same solutions were also scanned by PB-PCT with the same setting as the animal imaging, and a value of Ī¼ was determined by setting Ī³ā=ā3.34āĆā102 for each solution.
Image registration
A 3D registration technique based on mutual information measure [40] was used for matching 3D images at different time points (PB-PCT images of the cortical defect at different healing stages) or those obtained by different methods (images of the tibial metaphysis obtained by PB-PCT and conventional absorption-contrast CT). The mutual information was calculated while rotating and translating the one image (floating image) with fixing the other (reference image), and the highest degree of image matching was achieved by maximizing the mutual information. Trilinear partial volume distribution interpolation [40] was used when the voxel positions in a floating image (orientation changed) did not coincide with those in the reference image (orientation fixed). When matching of cortical defect images at three healing stages, the image at the second scan was set as the reference.
Bone image analysis
Simple thresholding was used to segment tomographic images into bone and non-bone regions. Bone images were compared between PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT in terms of volume, local values of Ī¼, and SNR, which was defined as the ratio of the mean intensity of bone section to the standard deviation of intensity of surrounding soft (muscle) tissue. For the analysis of bone-defect repair, newly formed bone was segmented from a cylindrical region of interest, chosen centrally within the cortical defect. Bone regeneration was compared between three groups in terms of volume and Ī¼ distribution.
Statistics
Equality of variances and normality of data frequency distribution were verified by Bartlettās test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, respectively. KruskalāWallis tests followed by Dunnās multiple comparison tests were used to assess differences among the three groups of mice (Sham, OVX, and OVX-E) because the data frequently violated the assumptions of equality of variances between groups or Gaussian distribution. All data were analyzed by Prism 6 (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA, USA), and Pā<ā0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
Propagation-based imaging with single-distance phase retrieval versus conventional absorption imaging
FigureĀ 2 shows transmission X-ray images of the same proximal parts of the tibia and fibula obtained by conventional absorption imaging, propagation-based imaging, and propagation-based imaging with single-distance phase retrieval. Without phase retrieval, propagation-based imaging provides an image similar in appearance to the absorption image because the image contrast of both images is based mainly on X-ray absorption. However, the edge-enhancement effect is observed as the fringes at the boundary between bone and soft tissue, thereby allowing the clearer delineation of bone surface than in the absorption imaging. With phase retrieval, propagation-based imaging produces a high-contrast image with a considerably higher SNR compared with the other two images, owing to the effects of high X-ray sensitivity of phase shifting and low-pass filtering in Eq.Ā 2. Instead, phase retrieval results in reduced resolution, as is evident from blurred bone boundaries in Fig.Ā 2c compared with those in Fig.Ā 2b.
PB-PCT versus absorption-contrast CT
In Fig.Ā 3a, axial tomographic images of the proximal tibial metaphysis are compared between PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT after image registration. The effect of low-pass filtering through phase retrieval appears as reduced noise and ring artifact. The visibility of trabecular and cortical porous structures is comparable between the PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT images as previously demonstrated [23]. When bone sections were segmented with a threshold of Ī¼ā=ā0.8ācmā1, values of SNR are 12.2 and 9.8 in the PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT images, respectively. The dose/scan of 6 Gy in absorption-contrast CT was three times higher than that of phase-contrast CT; thus, according to the relation of SNR \(\propto \sqrt {{\mathrm{dose}}}\) [12], SNR is estimated to decrease to 5.7 in absorption-contrast CT under the same dose/scan as in PB-PCT. FigureĀ 3b shows the two binarized bone sections (Ī¼ā>ā0.8ācmā1) from Fig.Ā 3a stacked on top of each other. The bone regions observed only in PB-PCT and only in absorption-contrast CT amount to 5.7% and 6.6%, respectively, relative to the overlapped bone region of 1.136āmm2. Indeed, 3D bone images reconstructed by PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT (Fig.Ā 3c) show a close similarity in bone structure except for small fragments of trabecular bone. The bone regions observed only in PB-PCT and only in absorption-contrast CT amount to 4.0% and 3.5%, respectively, relative to the common bone region of 0.684 mm3, and the volume differences in cancellous and cortical bones between the two matched images are 4.7% and 0.3%, respectively. The partial volume effect intrinsic to CT, which is highlighted in the trabecular bone with a local thickness of only a few voxels, is mainly responsible for the larger volume difference in cancellous bone. The volume difference in cancellous bone is similar to that reported as the error of image registration in early reproducibility studies of the absorption-contrast CT quantification of trabecular bone architecture [4, 5, 41], indicating the equivalent performance of PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT in delineating bone structure.
Single-distance PB-PCT was originally intended for imaging of a homogeneous object or an object with constant Ī“/Ī² and, as such, is deemed suitable for analysis of bone architecture rather than quantification of bone density or mineralization. However, Figs.Ā 2 and 3a suggest that some quantitative information on bone density is available from bone tomographic imaging by PB-PCT. FigureĀ 4a shows a scatter plot of Ī¼ of the phase- versus absorption-contrast CT images in Fig.Ā 3a; here, Gaussian blur with a radius of 1.5 pixels was applied to the latter, yielding a similar standard deviation of background (soft tissue) intensity between the two images (0.12 vs. 0.11 cmā1). There was a significant correlation between local Ī¼ values in the matched regions in Fig.Ā 3b (nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient, calculated exclusively for the regions of Ī¼ā>ā0.8ācmā1) although the regression slope deviated significantly from unity and the lines of identity and regression gradually diverge as Ī¼ decreases. Thus, PB-PCT could provide a certain amount of information on Ī¼, possibly allowing the rough assessment of bone mineralization. Note that the wide scattering of plots was partly resulted from noise or statistical uncertainty in X-ray CT imaging [42] and the image registration error. The latter could be evaluated by matching a stack of absorption-contrast CT images of tibial bone that was rotated by 3Ā° around each orthogonal axis and translated by a 1.5-voxel length along each axis. The correlation between local Ī¼ values of the matched cross-sections (Ī¼ā>ā0.8ācmā1) was less scattered with rā=ā0.950 (Pā<ā0.0001).
FigureĀ 4b showed the linear relation between Ī¼ and the density of K2HPO4 solution in PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT. A threshold of Ī¼ā=ā0.8ācmā1 corresponds to the solution density of 1.27 g/cm3 in PB-PCT and 1.21 g/cm3 in absorption-contrast CT, and Ī¼ā=ā2.0ācmā1 corresponds to the solution density of 1.90āg/cm3 in PB-PCT and 1.734 g/cm3 in absorption-contrast CT.
In the present study, Ī³ in Eq.Ā 2 (the parameter of the Lorentzian low-pass filter) was given as (Ī“bāāāĪ“s)/(Ī²bāāāĪ²s) for reducing the artifact of over-smoothing at the bone/soft-tissue interface. Here, we set Ī³ā=ā3.34āĆā102, which was derived as the value of fully-mineralized bone tissue. However, Ī³ varies from region to region according to the degree of local mineralization and the mineral-to-matrix ratio, and the variation of Ī³ within a segmented bone volume depends on the threshold of Ī¼ (see the Supplementary material). When using a threshold of Ī¼ā=ā0.8ācmā1, our estimate shows that regional Ī³ could be higher by 7.8ā47.1% than the set value (i.e., 3.34āĆā102). Such differences in Ī³ over a segmented bone volume increase by lowering the threshold value of Ī¼, and the performance of single-distance PB-PCT will become less quantitative, especially where Ī³ differs to the larger extent from the set value of Ī³. It was already reported that PB-PCT based on the assumption of constant Ī³ or homogeneous object was were found to be less than quantitative when Ī³ varies largely across reconstructed images; the image quality decreased more in regions where Ī³ differs further from the chosen value [43].
Monitoring of bone-defect repair
On days 3, 7, and 11, average body weights were 20.2āĀ±ā0.75, 20.8āĀ±ā0.41, and 21.3āĀ±ā0.52āg in Sham; 22.4āĀ±ā0.98, 22.6āĀ±ā0.79, and 22.6āĀ±ā0.98āg in OVX; and 20.5āĀ±ā0.84, 21.0āĀ±ā0.89, and 21.7āĀ±ā1.03āg in OVX-E. No difference was found among groups on each day of CT measurements.
Newly formed bone was segmented from the cortical defect region with a threshold of Ī¼ā=ā1.1ācmā1 as done in our previous studies of absorption contrast CT [44, 45]. This threshold corresponds to a density of K2HPO4 solution of 1.43āg/cm3 in PB-PCT. Decreasing the range of bone density by setting a higher threshold of Ī¼ leads to a smaller variation of Ī³ across the segmented bone volume, thereby making the assumption of constant Ī³ more acceptable (see the the Supplementary material). Therefore, Ī³ā=ā3.34āĆā102 was also used in the observation of bone-defect repair process by PB-PCT. FigureĀ 5a, b shows tomographic images of the drill-hole defect segment of tibial bone and newly formed bone in the cortical defect of a sham-operated mouse at the three time points of scanning. Images at different time points were 3D-registered, enabling us to follow the process of bone-defect healing in individual mice. Newly formed bone was nearly undetectable on day 3 because angiogenesis would be dominant at this stage [44, 45]. On day 7, small, thin bone segments (woven-like bone) appeared, but the large part of the defect, corresponding to void space, was still occupied by non-mineralized or low-mineralized tissues (Ī¼ā<ā1.1ācmā1). On day 11, bone-defect repair had highly advanced; woven-like bone increased and showed a solid appearance. FigureĀ 5c shows 3D displays of the bone defect, where the images on days 7 and 11 are registered and superimposed, giving a rough indication of local bone formation (red) with small amounts of bone resorption (blue). Over this 4-day period, new bone formation proceeded mainly outward from the already-regenerated bone (gray) and centripetally from the periphery of the defect.
In all three groups, bone-defect repair advanced similarly as shown in Fig.Ā 5, and the defect filling reached similar levels on day 11. Some quantitative differences, however, could be detected during bone regeneration. FigureĀ 6 shows the volume fraction of newly formed bone on days 3, 7, and 11 and its increase over 4 days from day 3 to day 7 and day 7 to day 11. In comparison between Sham and OVX, bone regeneration was decreased in OVX over days 3ā7 and consequently, the defect filling was lower in OVX on day 7, which is consistent with a previous in vivo absorption-contrast CT study [30]. Over days 7ā11, however, bone regeneration tended to advance more in OVX than in Sham, showing a similar degree of bone repair on day 11 between the two groups. No difference was found in the defect filling between Sham and OVX-E through the experimental period. Bone repair advanced more in OVX-E than in OVX over days 3ā7, and accordingly, the defect filling was higher in OVX-E than in OVX on day 7. However, bone regeneration accelerated more in OVX than in OVX-E over days 7ā11, leading to no difference in the defect filling on day 11 between the two groups.
Considering a significant correlation in Ī¼ values between PB-PCT and absorption-contrast CT and a proportional relation between mineral density and Ī¼ (Fig.Ā 4), which accurately estimated by the latter under the use of monochromatic X-rays, PB-PCT would be feasible for assessment of bone mineralization, at least over the stages of bone regeneration. FigureĀ 7 compares frequency distributions of Ī¼ (relative number of voxels at each Ī¼ value) obtained from Sham, OVX, and OVX-E. On day 7, a monotonic decrease of frequency with increasing Ī¼ was observed in all three groups; in particular, Sham and OVX had very similar distribution. On day 11, the frequency distribution of Ī¼ in OVX differed from that in Sham and OVX-E. At this stage, very similar monomodal distributions were observed in Sham and OVX-E with a peak each at Ī¼ā=ā1.54 and 1.51ācmā1, respectively. This shift of Ī¼ distribution from days 7 to 11 is very similar to that in a similar bone defect in mice, observed by synchrotron radiation-based absorption CT [45]. In OVX, however, no clear peak was observed and the distribution was still biased toward lower Ī¼ values, indicating that bone mineralization was delayed. As a result, on day 11, although all three groups showed similar bone regeneration in volumetric terms, the measure of mineralization of newly formed bone was low in OVX compared with the other groups. Thus, PB-PCT permits the detection of the anticipated effectiveness of 14,15-EET in improving the bone repair in OVX in terms of both volume and mineralization. Note that a measure of volume fraction of newly formed bone (Fig.Ā 6) varies depending on a threshold of Ī¼ for bone segmentation; when it is set at a higher value by a certain extent than 1.1ācmā1, the ovariectomy-induced impairment of bone healing and its improvement by 14,15-EET will become apparent in volumetric terms on day 11.
Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) promote regeneration of multiple organs and tissues in vivo, and this effect is partially mediated by EET-dependent stimulation of angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor [28, 32]. A study using a mouse model of femoral drill-hole injury showed that bone repair was impaired and preceded by poor angiogenesis in ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis [31]. Angiogenesis is essential for bone healing; [33] thus, it is possible that the administration of 14,15-EET improves angiogenesis and thereby the bone-defect healing in OVX. Further studies are required to elucidate the pro-angiogenic effect of EETs on the improvement of bone repair. Furthermore, it was reported recently that EETs inhibit osteoclastogenesis through multiple pathways and almost completely prevented ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis [46]. Apart from the pro-angiogenic effect of EETs, there is also a need to determine whether EETs may play a direct role in promoting osteoblastogenesis.
Limitations
In repeated CT scans, the radiation effect on bone is likely to vary depending on not only cumulative dose but also on scanning protocols as well as animal species, age, and size. In 17-week-old mice, three weekly scans with 1.255āGy (cumulatively 3.765āGy) had no effect on femoral trabecula [47]. Conversely, in 12-week-old mice, threeāfour weekly scans with 0.8459āGy (cumulatively 2.538ā3.384āGy) decreased the volume fraction of trabecular bone in the radiated tibiae [10]. The same study also showed that rats were more resilient to the same amount of radiation exposure than mice [10]. Recently, the radiation effect of repeated CT scans on bone development of young rats, which are more sensitive to radiation [48], were investigated [11]. A weekly dose of 0.83āGy/scan (cumulatively 7.47āGy) over 8 weeks through the ages from 4 to 12 weeks did not interfere with tibial bone development. However, a weekly dose of 1.65āGy/scan (cumulatively 14.85āGy) or more adversely affected marrow cells and growth of tibiae. Although the radiation effects on bone regeneration could not be extrapolated from the effects on trabecula or on bone development, two doses of 2āGy/scan with a 3-day interval in the present study will exceed a safe level of radiation and influence bone regeneration, even though the cumulative dose (4āGy excluding the third scan, following which of the animals are sacrificed) would stay within a safe limit. However, at least apparently, the repair of cortical bone defects occurred similarly as reported in earlier studies using a drill-hole injury model in mice [31, 45]. Monitoring over a week or so after the end of scanning might fail to detect a radiation-induced impairment of bone repair. Indeed, the effects on bone and marrow cell activities were shown to be evident at an earlier date [11, 49, 50], and the radiation effect on bone growth has been reported to reach a maximum 7ā14 days after irradiation [51].
Spatial resolution and SNR in CT are limited by the radiation dose that can be applied; an increased dose is required with the fourth power of linear resolution to maintain SNR [12]. Conversely, by lowering the resolution, the dose can be reduced substantially. In the present CT system, the dose/scan actually decreases to the same level (0.5āGy/scan) as used in laboratory in vivo CT by increasing the voxel size from 6.54 to 9.25āĪ¼m. Furthermore, by allowing for the decrease in SNR to the comparable level with absorption-contrast CT as shown in Fig.Ā 3a, the dose could be further reduced. Multidistance phase retrieval may be a possible alternative for reducing radiation dose in PB-PCT. Under the same radiation dose, multidistance PB-PCT could result in a higher quality of image reconstruction than single-distance PB-PCT, especially with optimizing the number of distances and exposure time at each distance [52]. Although the extra time for moving a detector and taking additional reference images is undesirable from the viewpoint of animal postural maintenance, this dose-effective method would be valuable for in vivo monitoring of bone microstructure.
Conclusions
We assessed the feasibility and validity of synchrotron radiation-based PB-PCT with single-distance phase retrieval for in vivo bone imaging through its application to monitoring of bone-defect healing at three different time points in sham-operated mice, ovariectomized mice, and ovariectomized mice administered with 14,15-EET. Images of newly formed bone segmented by simple thresholding could demonstrate the ovariectomy-induced impairment of bone healing and the protective effect of 14,15-EET against it. Although imaging of bone tissue goes beyond its original use, PB-PCT with single-distance phase retrieval is shown to be potentially useful in tracking of local changes in not only bone architecture but also bone mineralization. However, its quantitative performance will be degraded for bone tissue with broad ranges of mineralization and mineral-to-matrix ratio. The future challenge is lowering the radiation dose to levels supposed to be safe, while maintaining image quality. The common dose used in bone scanning by synchrotron light lies between 0.5 and 1āGy [25]. Furthermore, although the present spatial resolution could serve to track the drastic changes in bone structure, the higher spatial resolution is necessary for identifying the micro-loci of bone formation and resorption through suppressing the partial volume effect or promoting the accuracy of image registration.
References
MĆ¼ller R. Hierarchical microimaging of bone structure and function. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:373ā81.
Kinney JH, Ryaby JT, Haupt DL, Lane NE. Three-dimensional in vivo morphometry of trabecular bone in the OVX rat model of osteoporosis. Technol Health Care. 1998;6:339ā50.
Campbell GM, Sophocleous A. Quantitative analysis of bone and soft tissue by micro-computed tomography: applications to ex vivo and in vivo studies. Bonekey Rep. 2014;3:564.
Waarsing JH, Day JS, van der Linden JC, Ederveen AG, Spanjers C, De Clerck N, et al. Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone. 2004;34:163ā9.
Matsumoto T, Nishikawa K, Tanaka M, Uesugi K. In vivo CT quantification of trabecular bone dynamics in mice after sciatic neurectomy using monochromatic synchrotron radiation. Calcif Tissue Int. 2011;88:432ā41.
Lukas C, Ruffoni D, Lambers FM, Schulte FA, Kuhn G, Kollmannsberger P, et al. Mineralization kinetics in murine trabecular bone quantified by time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography. Bone. 2013;56:55ā60.
Altman AR, Tseng WJ, de Bakker CMJ, Chandra A, Lan S, Huh BK, et al. Quantification of skeletal growth, modeling, and remodeling by in vivo micro computed tomography. Bone. 2015;81:370ā9.
Birkhold AI, Razi H, Weinkamer R, Duda GN, Checa S, Willie BM. Monitoring in vivo (re)modeling: a computational approach using 4D microCT data to quantify bone surface movements. Bone. 2015;75:210ā21.
Pauchard Y, Mattmann C, Kuhn A, Gasser JA, Boyd SK. European society of biomechanics S.M. Perren Award 2008: Using temporal trends of 3D bone micro-architecture to predict bone quality. J Biomech. 2008;41:2946ā53.
Klinck RJ, Campbell GM, Boyd SK. Radiation effects on bone architecture in mice and rats resulting from in vivo micro-computed tomography scanning. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:888ā95.
Mustafy T, Benoit A, Londono I, Moldovan F, Villemure I. Can repeated in vivo micro-CT irradiation during adolescence alter bone microstructure, histomorphometry and longitudinal growth in a rodent model? PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207323.
Ford NL, Thornton MM, Holdsworth DW. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals. Med Phys. 2003;30:2869ā77.
Bayat S, Apostol L, Boller E, Brochard T, Peyrin F. In vivo imaging of bone micro-architecture in mice with 3D synchrotron radiation micro-tomography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2005;548:247ā52.
Momose A, Fukuda J. Phase-contrast radiographs of nonstained rat cerebellar specimen. Med Phys. 1995;22:375ā9.
Zhou SA, Brahme A. Development of phase-contrast X-ray imaging techniques and potential medical applications. Phys Med. 2008;24:129ā48.
Bravin A, Coan P, Suortti P. X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:R1ā35.
Paganin D, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE, Miller PR, Wilkins SW. Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J Microsc. 2002;206:33ā40.
Gureyev TE, Mayo SC, Myers DE, Nesterets Y, Paganin DM, Pogany A, et al. Refracting Rƶntgenās rays: Propagation-based x-ray phase contrast for biomedical imaging. J Appl Phys. 2009;105:102005.
Langer M, Cloetens P, Guigay JP, Peyrin F. Quantitative comparison of direct phase retrieval algorithms in in-line phase tomography. Med Phys. 2008;35:4556ā66.
Arhatari BD, Gates WP, Eshtiaghi N, Peele AG. Phase retrieval tomography in the presence of noise. J Appl Phys. 2010;107:034904.
Gureyev T, Mohammadi S, Nesterets Y, Dullin C, Tromba G. Accuracy and precision of reconstruction of complex refractive index in near-field single-distance propagation-based phase-contrast tomography. J Appl Phys. 2013;114:144906.
Langer M, Liu Y, Tortelli F, Cloetens P, Cancedda R, Peyrin F. Regularized phase tomography enables study of mineralized and unmineralized tissue in porous bone scaffold. J Microsc. 2010;238:230ā9.
Arhatari BD, Cooper DML, Thomas CDL, Clement JG, Peele AG. Imaging the 3D structure of secondary osteons in human cortical bone using phase-retrieval tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5265ā74.
Mohammadi S, Larsson E, Alves F, Dal Monego S, Biffi S, Garrovo C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of a single-distance phase-retrieval method applied on in-line phase-contrast images of a mouse lung. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2014;21:784ā9.
Pratt I, Belev G, Zhu N, Chapman LD, Cooper DML. In vivo imaging of rat cortical bone porosity by synchrotron phase contrast micro computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:211ā32.
Gasilov S, Mittone A, Horng A, Geith T, Bravin A, Baumbach T, et al. Hard X-ray index of refraction tomography of a whole rabbit knee joint: a feasibility study. Phys Med. 2016;32:1785ā9.
Kitchen MJ, Buckley GA, Gureyev TE, Wallace MJ, Andres-Thio N, Uesugi K, et al. CT dose reduction factors in the thousands using X-ray phase contrast. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15953.
Panigrahy D, Kalish BT, Huang S, Bielenberg DR, Le HD, Yang J, et al. Epoxyeicosanoids promote organ and tissue regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:13528ā33.
Nuzzo S, Peyrin F, Cloetens P, Baruchel J, Boivin G. Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. Med Phys. 2002;29:2672ā81.
Namkung-Matthai H, Appleyard R, Jansen J, Hao Lin J, Maastricht S, Swain M, et al. Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone. 2001;28:80ā6.
He YX, Zhang G, Pan XH, Liu Z, Zheng LZ, Chan CW, et al. Impaired bone healing pattern in mice with ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis: a drill-hole defect model. Bone. 2011;48:1388ā400.
Webler AC, Michaelis UR, Popp R, Barbosa-Sicard E, Murugan A, Falck JR, et al. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids are part of the VEGF-activated signaling cascade leading to angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295:C1292ā301.
Carano RA, Filvaroff EH. Angiogenesis and bone repair. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:980ā9.
Goto S, Takeshita K, Suzuki Y, Ohashi H, Asano Y, Kimura H, et al. Construction and commissioning of a 215-m-long beamline at SPring-8. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2001;467:682ā5.
Gureyev TE, Nesterets YI, Stevenson AW, Miller PR, Pogany A, Wilkins SW. Some simple rules for contrast, signal-to-noise and resolution in in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging. Opt Express. 2008;16:3223ā41.
Teague MR. Deterministic phase retrieval: a Greenās function solution. J Opt Soc Am. 1983;73:1434ā41.
Myers GR, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE, Paganin DM, Wilkins SW. Polychromatic cone-beam phase-contrast tomography. Phys Rev A. 2007;76:045804.
Beltran MA, Paganin DM, Uesugi K, Kitchen MJ. 2D and 3D X-ray phase retrieval of multi-material objects using a single defocus distance. Opt Express. 2010;18:6423ā36.
Beltran MA, Paganin DM, Siu KK, Fouras A, Hooper SB, Reser DH, et al. Interface-specific x-ray phase retrieval tomography of complex biological organs. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:7353ā69.
Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;16:187ā98.
Voor MJ, Yang S, Burden RL, Waddell SW. In vivo micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: Repeatability and reproducibility. J Biomech. 2008;41:186ā93.
Diwakar M, Kumar M. A review on CT image noise and its denoising. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2018;42:73ā88.
Langer M, Cloetens P, Hesse B, Suhonen H, Pacureanu A, Raum K, et al. Priors for X-ray in-line phase tomography of heterogeneous objects. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014;372:20130129.
Matsumoto T, Goto D, Sato S. Subtraction micro-computed tomography of angiogenesis and osteogenesis during bone repair using synchrotron radiation with a novel contrast agent. Lab Investig. 2013;93:1054ā63.
Matsumoto T, Goto D. Effect of low-intensity whole-body vibration on bone defect repair and associated vascularization in mice. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55:2257ā66.
Guan H, Zhao L, Cao H, Chen A, Xiao J. Epoxyeicosanoids suppress osteoclastogenesis and prevent ovariectomy-induced bone loss. FASEB J. 2015;29:1092ā101.
Judex S, Chung H, Torab A, Xie L, Rubin CT, Donahue LR, et al. Micro-CT induced radiation does not exacerbate disuse related bone loss. In: Transactions of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 2005; Washington, DC.
Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, MĆ¼ller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1468ā86.
Willey JS, Lloyd SA, Robbins ME, Bourland JD, Smith-Sielicki H, Bowman LC, et al. Early increase in osteoclast number in mice after whole-body irradiation with 2 Gy X rays. Radiat Res. 2008;170:388ā92.
Dare A, Hachisu R, Yamaguchi A, Yokose S, Yoshiki S, Okano T. Effects of ionizing radiation on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells. J Dent Res. 1997;76:658ā64.
Engstrƶm H, Jansson JO, Engstrƶm C. Effect of local irradiation on longitudinal bone growth in the rat: a tetracycline labelling investigation. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1983;22:129ā33.
Frachon T, Weber L, Hesse B, Rit S, Dong P, Olivier C, et al. Dose fractionation in synchrotron radiation x-ray phase micro-tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:7543ā66.
Acknowledgements
In vivo SRCT was performed at SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (proposal nos. 2013B1731, 2014A1725). Part of this study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant nos. 26282120, 15K12509 and 18K19926) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. The authors are indebted to Shota Sato, Yoshihiro Hashimoto, and Shinya Itamochi (Osaka University Graduate School of Engineering Science) for their assistance with animal experiments, and Shohei Hashimoto and Kazuki Ikeda (Faculty of Engineering, Tokushima University) for their assistance with image processing. We thank Libby Cone, MD, MA, from Edanz Group Japan for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisherās note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsumoto, T., Shimizu, R. & Uesugi, K. In vivo monitoring of bone microstructure by propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography using monochromatic synchrotron light. Lab Invest 100, 72ā83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-019-0337-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-019-0337-3