Introduction

Although sepsis-related mortality rates have decreased over the past 30 years, sepsis is still a threat to neonatal survival, especially in low birth weight and preterm neonates [1]. Between 1989 and 2003, a downward trend in the number of early-onset sepsis cases and an increase in the number of late-onset sepsis (LOS) episodes has been observed. With recent infection prevention interventions, LOS rates have started to decrease; however, in comparison with early onset, LOS is still associated with higher occurrence rates and mortality [2].

A variety of organisms are responsible for LOS, with coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) being the most common organism involved [1, 3, 4]. Vancomycin is commonly used to treat CoNS infections [3,4,5]. Thus, vancomycin dose optimization is important to maximize therapeutic effectiveness while limiting toxicity and development of bacterial resistance [3]. This poses a therapeutic challenge, considering vancomycin’s variable pharmacokinetics in neonates [4, 6] and limited evidence to support the variety of dosing recommendations in neonates [3].

Increased rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) eradication in adults have been observed with area under the 24 h concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios (AUC24/MIC) greater than 400, and thus this is often considered the ideal therapeutic target for all pathogens [7]. Targeting AUC24/MIC ratios is clinically unfeasible, and has not been validated in neonates [3, 5, 8], and thus most centers utilize trough levels to assess vancomycin dosing [4, 5, 8]. In adults, trough concentrations of 10–20 mg/mL are recommended as a surrogate parameter for AUC24/MIC ≥ 400 when treating pathogens with an MIC ≤1 mg/L [7]. There is emerging pharmacokinetic data that suggest the correlation between AUC24/MIC values and trough concentrations differs in neonates, and lower trough levels may be acceptable [9], but, until further research, many clinicians continue to use target neonatal trough levels extrapolated from adult data [3, 10, 11].

Risks associated with suboptimal trough levels involve treatment failure and emergence of resistant bacterial strains [7]. Based on the 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America pediatric recommendations for trough targets of 10–20 mg/mL [11], and our clinical observations that recommended trough levels were not being achieved, our group conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of our previous empirical dosing regimen (15–45 mg/kg/day; Table 1) at achieving target levels [5]. The results indicated that 65% of neonates were not meeting the minimum trough recommendation upon initial dosing. Based on this, in 2014 our group developed a revised empirical dosage regimen (20–60 mg/kg/day) that was predicted to better achieve target trough levels (Table 2).

Table 1 Previous empirical dosing regimen
Table 2 Revised dosing regimen used in the present cohort (created in 2014), mean troughs per age group and proportion of patients in the present cohort with trough levels below, at or above target

Other centers have attempted to assess the performance of empirical dosing regimens similar to ours [10, 12, 13]. A group in the Netherlands investigated a slightly different regimen (15 to 80 mg/kg/day), and found that 47% (n = 112) of neonates did not achieve target serum trough concentrations (10–15 mg/L) on their initial dose [8].

Clinical factors impacting renal function and vancomycin clearance should be considered when revising a dosing regimen. Gestational age (GA) and chronological age (CA) are known to be correlated with vancomycin clearance [4]. Neonates who are small for gestational age (SGA; birth weight <10th percentile for GA) [6] have been shown to have impaired renal function [14]. Medications with nephrotoxic effects can also reduce renal function [15]. In addition, conventional mechanical ventilation has been shown to cause an increase in thoracic pressures, reducing cardiac output to the kidneys [16].

The initiative to improve our neonatal dosing practices began with our original study [5] which determined that we were not consistently reaching recommended target troughs. We implemented a new vancomycin regimen across all our sites, based on our own results and guiding standards from the literature, such as the Neofax® recommendations [17]. We used data from a cohort of preterm and term babies with the primary objective of validating the effectiveness of our revised empirical regimen in achieving target trough levels.

Methods

Study design

A multisite retrospective before-and-after cohort study was conducted using chart review from January 2014 to January 2016 at five neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Ethics approval was received from the local Health Research Ethics Board.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study population consisted of neonates admitted to a NICU, up to a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 44 weeks. Patients on their initial course of vancomycin therapy who received a minimum of two doses in accordance with the revised vancomycin dosing regimen (20 to 60 mg/kg/day, Table 2) and had at least one appropriately drawn vancomycin level (drawn within 1 h prior to the pre-third or later dose) were included in the study. In cases where more than one vancomycin level was drawn, the first steady-state vancomycin level which was drawn appropriately was included. If this level was not within target, then the first steady-state vancomycin level that did reach target trough range was recorded for analysis of the dose adjustment that was required to reach a target trough level. Repeat courses of vancomycin were excluded.

Data collection

A list of patients who received vancomycin while in an NICU from January 2014 through January 2016 was generated through a computerized charting database. Demographic data collected included date of birth, GA, CA, birth weight and weight at the time of vancomycin initiation. Data on clinical factors were collected and included: serum creatinine (SrCr), concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications, SGA status, diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), respiratory support and microbial cultures.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome

The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of neonates who achieved serum trough levels below target (<10 mg/L), at target (10–20 mg/L) or above target (>20 mg/L) on their initial vancomycin dose using our revised dosing regimen.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1.

    Mean percent difference between the revised empiric dosing and the dose required to achieve target levels (if they were achieved).

  2. 2.

    Difference in mean trough levels between the two cohorts.

  3. 3.

    Differences in proportion of patients achieving target trough levels on the previous empiric dosing regimen (historical cohort) compared to the revised (present cohort) vancomycin regimen.

  4. 4.

    Any relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and trough levels in the present cohort, including:

    • SGA

    • Presence of nephrotoxic medications (diuretics, aminoglycosides, inotropes, steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents) administered <48 h prior to the included vancomycin trough.

    • Highest level of respiratory support (invasive, non-invasive or spontaneous) administered <48 h prior to the included vancomycin trough. Our definition of invasive respiratory support included assist control, pressure control, high-frequency oscillation, high-frequency jet ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Non-invasive respiratory support was defined as continuous positive airway pressure, bi-level ventilation and non-invasive positive pressure ventilator support.

    • SrCr values within 48 h before or 24 h after the included vancomycin trough.

    • Presence of positive blood, urine, internal wound or skin, cerebral spinal fluid, sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures (<48 h prior to initiation or during vancomycin therapy).

    • Diagnosis of NEC (<48 h prior to initiation or during vancomycin therapy).

    • CA

    • PMA

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel and SPSS Inc. (Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive statistics were used for patient characteristics and clinical descriptors. Baseline characteristics were compared between cohorts using t-test analysis (GA at birth, PMA, CA) and weight at the time of vancomycin initiation).

The primary endpoint was calculated for the cohort overall and for each GA/CA subgroup in our dosing regimen. For our secondary endpoints, mean percentage increase in total daily dose required to achieve target levels (if they were achieved) was calculated. Chi-squared and pairwise z-test post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction was conducted to test for cohort differences in proportions and t-tests were used for cohort differences in means.

Finally, the relationship between demographic and clinical covariates with vancomycin trough levels was assessed using multiple linear regression. Variables associated with vancomycin troughs at p < 0.05 in the simple linear regression were included in the multiple linear regression model for prediction of vancomycin troughs.

Results

A total of 194 patients were screened for inclusion, and 76 (39.16%) participants were excluded. Twenty-nine (15%) neonates were not started on the revised dosing regimen, 17 (9%) did not have any trough levels collected, 27 (14%) had inappropriately sampled trough levels and 3 (1.6%) had drug levels collected prematurely. A total 118 neonates were included in the current cohort, with a median gestation age of 28.26 (Table 3). The present and historical cohorts differed in PMA, CA and weight at initiation of vancomycin but did not differ in GA at birth. The new dosing regimen was made up of seven age groups (Table 2); however, no patients in the present cohort met the age criteria of age group seven. Twenty-three patients had positive cultures. Most bacterial isolates were Gram positive (74%), with the most common being CoNS (39% of isolates). Other Gram-positive isolates included MRSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Six patients had cultures showing Gram-negative isolates, including Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella oxytoca.

Table 3 Baseline characteristics

In the present cohort, 63 (53.39%) participants achieved target trough levels (10–20 mg/L), 44 (37.29%) reached levels of <10 mg/L and 11 (9.32%) had levels of ≥20 mg/L (Table 4). The youngest age group had the greatest proportion of patients (61.29%) with trough levels of <10 mg/L (Table 2). However, out of the 31 patients in this age group, only 3 had trough levels of <5 mg/L. On the opposite end, trough levels of >20 mg/L were found in the highest proportion (20.69%) in age group four, with five patients achieving troughs in the range of 20–26 mg/L and one patient with a trough of 45.7 mg/L. Age group three was the most successful, with the greatest proportion (78.57%) of patients reaching target trough levels.

Table 4 Cohort differences in mean troughs and proportion of patients reaching below, at and above target trough levels

Out of the 55 neonates who did not reach target troughs on the revised dosing regimen, 28 patients received a dose change to achieve target levels. The percent dose adjustment ranged from −29.63 to 71.43%, with a mean of 27.28%. Patients in the youngest age group required the greatest mean daily dose increase (n = 9; 50.40%), while patients in age group four required a mean dose decrease (n = 4; −26.61%).

Mean trough levels were compared between cohorts. A significant difference in mean troughs was found with higher levels seen in the present cohort (p < 0.001; Table 4). In addition, chi-squared analysis demonstrated an association between trough levels and cohort group (p < 0.001), and post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the proportions of patients reaching below, at and above target troughs differed significantly between cohorts (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The present cohort had a higher proportion of troughs at and above target, and a lower proportion of below target troughs in comparison to the historical cohort.

Simple regression identified culture status and invasive respiratory support as the two covariates significantly associated with vancomycin troughs (p < 0.05), and thus these were selected for inclusion in the multiple regression analysis. Culture status remained the only statistically significant predictor of vancomycin troughs (p = 0.031) in the multiple regression analysis. Culture status was negatively associated with vancomycin levels (β = −3.271; p = 0.031), indicating that patients with positive cultures were more likely to have lower trough levels than patients with negative cultures (Table 5).

Table 5 Associations between clinical/demographic covariates and trough levels

Discussion

In 2009, we set out to confirm and address a care gap observed in our neonatal population. The original pharmacokinetically predicted regimen which was suggested in our previous study [5] differs slightly from the current regimen as the current regimen was informed by the greater body of evidence to attempt alignment of the various dosing regimens in the literature. The current analysis identified a substantial improvement in the proportion of neonates who achieved target vancomycin levels on the current regimen compared to the previous (53.39% vs 34.17% respectively). The proportion of patients reaching levels of <10 mg/L was much lower with the new regimen (37.29% vs 64.50%), and the proportion of patients with troughs >20 mg/L did not surpass 10%.

Our dosing regimen closely resembles the Neofax® vancomycin dosing recommendations, with differences in the CA cut-off points for age groups one and two [17]. Other studies have based dosing regimens on the Neofax® protocol [10, 12, 13]. In one study, the dosing regimen was similar to ours with the exception of a lower standard dose (10 mg/kg vs 15 mg/kg), which may explain why the majority of their participants (76%) achieved troughs of <10 mg/L [10]. Ringenberg et al. [12] evaluated the effectiveness of the Neofax® dosing model using 15 mg/kg as the standard empiric dose. However, even with this dosing increase, 71.9% (n = 171) of patients achieved troughs values of <10 mg/L after empiric dosing [12]. The dose required to achieve initial target troughs was found to be an average dose of 32.4 mg/kg/day. Similarly, Badran et al. [13] found that 16.6% of 151 neonates achieved target troughs between 10 and 16.6 mg/L using an empiric dose based on Neofax®.

Although our current regimen achieved better results in comparison to the previous regimen, a proportion of patients still achieved sub-target troughs. The patients with the greatest proportion of troughs of <10 mg/L were those in age group one (Table 2). A pharmacodynamics study using 1000 simulated neonates and C-reactive protein as an endpoint for vancomycin efficacy demonstrated that neonates <29 weeks PMA receiving 15 mg/kg every 24 h are generally underdosed [18]. The authors suggested optimizing the dosing regimen to 15 mg/kg every 12 h for neonates <29 weeks. Comparably, another study suggested 12.5 mg/kg every 12 h for all neonates with PMA <29 weeks [19]. Based on this, it may be beneficial to further revise our dosing regimen to include shorter dosing intervals for patients in age group one. In the Neofax® dosing regimen, patients <29 weeks are subdivided into CA groups of <14 and >14 days [17]; however, in our regimen this group is subdivided as <21 and >21 days. Perhaps patients who are <29 weeks (PMA) and >14 days (CA) experience changes in renal function which renders them underdosed with our current regimen.

Having said that, it is important to examine the evidence behind the targets we aim to achieve. Evidence has emerged supporting lower target troughs of 7–11 mg/L for achievement of AUC/MIC >400 in neonates when treating MRSA infections with an MIC ≤1 [9]. Further research is needed in this area to determine if clinical outcomes are comparable with lower target troughs in neonates.

Finally, we assessed the relationship between clinical characteristics and vancomycin troughs. Microbial culture status was the only statistically significant covariate in our multiple regression model, with positive cultures showing an association with lower vancomycin troughs. This is consistent with the theory that sepsis may increase volume of distribution [20].

Due to the retrospective nature of the study, potential confounders affecting vancomycin trough levels could not be controlled for. The two cohorts differed in PMA, CA and weight, but these factors did not have a significant association with trough levels in the simple linear regression analysis. Many vancomycin troughs were collected prior to administration of the third dose which may have underestimated levels at true steady state. Thus, the proportion of babies achieving target (or supra-therapeutic) levels when using the revised regimen may be greater than is shown in our results. This is, however, the usual level (pre-third) used by our group and reflects current practice. Furthermore, time to steady state can vary significantly in neonates, depending on postnatal age; thus true steady-state levels would require individualized timing of level collection [21]. In addition, our regression analyses may not have been powered to detect every significant covariate.

Lastly, although SrCr was analyzed for association with serum trough levels, only 44 patients (37%) had SrCr samples collected within 48 h before and 24 h after the included vancomycin trough. Vancomycin troughs and SrCr were not statistically associated, and thus based on our results we cannot indicate if supra-therapeutic levels led to potential nephrotoxicity in the present cohort. It is possible that an association was not seen due to a low sample of patients with collected SrCr.

Our empiric vancomycin dosing regimen is significantly more effective in achieving serum trough concentrations than the previous one. Further adjustments could be made to increase the proportion of patients reaching target troughs. We have created a regimen that balances timely achievement of target troughs for a large proportion of our population while remaining close to published vancomycin dosing regimens. We hope this will inform other centers and allow the convergence of various dosing regimens in this unique population.