Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Differences in prenatal aneuploidy screening among African–American women with hemoglobin S variants

Abstract

Objective

It has been shown that hemoglobinopathies increase the risk of pregnancy complications and placental dysfunction. This could alter the placental analytes examined during prenatal aneuploidy screening. Our objective was to determine whether there is a difference in maternal serum screening results for women with hemoglobin S variants (AS, SS, SC, S/beta thalassemia) compared with women with normal hemoglobin (AA).

Study design

This is a retrospective cohort study in African–American women receiving aneuploidy screening at MedStar Washington Hospital Center from 2008 to 2015. We evaluated 79 women with hemoglobin S variants (69 AS and 10 sickle cell disease (SCD)) and 79 controls. Descriptive statistics (means, medians, and frequencies) were calculated for each group. For the continuous variables, differences in the averages between the two groups were tested using the t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Differences in the averages between three or more groups were tested using the analysis of variance test or the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

Demographics were similar between cases and controls. The overall screen positive rate for Down syndrome among patients with sickle cell trait (AS) was 3% (2/69). For patients with SCD, the overall screen positive rate was 10% (1/10). None of the women in the control population (AA) has a positive Down syndrome screening result (0/79).

Conclusion

As expected, the screen positive rate in patients with hemoglobin S variants was higher than controls, however, patients with sickle cell trait do not appear to be at an increased risk for false-positive results with serum aneuploidy screening compared with the general population. We did, however, find an increased risk of false-positive quad screen results in patients with sickle cell disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACOG Committee on Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:229–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barfield WD, Barradas DT, Manning SE, Kotelchuck M, Shapiro-Mendoza CK. Sickle cell disease and pregnancy outcomes: women of African descent. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:S542–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oteng-Ntim E, Meeks D, Seed PT, Webster L, Howard J, Doyle P, et al. Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;125:3316–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larrabee KD, Monga M. Women with sickle cell trait are at increased risk for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:425–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tita AT, Biggio JR, Chapman V, Neely C, Rouse DJ. Perinatal and maternal outcomes in women with sickle or hemoglobin C trait. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Practice Bulletin No. 163. Summary: screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:979–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dugoff L. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. First- and second-trimester maternal serum markers for aneuploidy and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1052–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagnon A, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Allen VM, Blight C, Brock JA, et al. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:918–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baer RJ, Currier RJ, Norton ME, Flessel MC, Goldman S, Towner D, et al. Obstetric, perinatal, and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with false-positive integrated screening results. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:603–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trampont P, Roudier M, Andrea AM, Nomal N, Mignot TM, Leborgne-Samuel Y, et al. The placental-umbilical unit in sickle cell disease pregnancy: A model for studying in vivo functional adjustments to hypoxia in humans. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:1353–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benn PA, Ying J, Beazoglou T, Egan JF. Estimates for the sensitivity and false-positive rates for second trimester serum screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18 with adjustment for cross-identification and double-positive results. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:46–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spencer K. Age related detection and false positive rates when screening for Down’s syndrome in the first trimester using fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta hCG and PAPP-A. BJOG. 2001;108:1043–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kneitel AW, Rhee-Morris L, Obadia R, Towner D. Increased false positive Down syndrome screening in women with sickle cell anemia. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:797–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palomaki GE, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA. A summary analysis of down syndrome markers in the late first trimester. Adv Clin Chem. 2007;43:177–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rathod KB, Jaiswal KN, Shrivastava AC, Shrikhande AV. Study of placenta in sickle cell disorders. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2007;50:698–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banerjee S, et al. “Placental Morphogenesis in Pregnancies with Down’s Syndrome might Provide a Clue to Pre-Eclampsia”. Placenta. 2002;23:172–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherer DM, Abulafia O. Angiogenesis during implantation, and placental and early embryonic development. Placenta. 2001;22:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016; Available at: www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/sicklecell/data.html. Accessed 31 August 2017.

  19. Serjeant GR, Vichinsky E. Variability of homozygous sickle cell disease: The role of alpha and beta globin chain variation and other factors. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017;70:66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Eshetu Tefera, M.S, and the Medstar Health Research Institute for statistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to April D. Adams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adams, A.D., Schaa, K. & Overcash, R.T. Differences in prenatal aneuploidy screening among African–American women with hemoglobin S variants. J Perinatol 38, 797–803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0159-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0159-y

Search

Quick links