Main

Although hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) is a common problem in premature infants, the relative contribution of primary lung disease vs. failure of normal postnatal decline in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) may be difficult to differentiate clinically. The focus of this review is to assist readers in understanding the contribution of acute pulmonary hypertension (PH) to the health of premature infants and appraising strategies to modulate the course. The approach to diagnosis and management of acute PH in the preterm infant is an area of considerable controversy. The successful utilization of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) to decrease the requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in term neonates (1) combined with increased recognition that preterm neonates are also at risk of PH-related clinical consequences has created clinical uncertainty. Clinical course and response to treatment are thought to be developmentally regulated. In addition, diagnosis is confounded by coexisting and confounding illnesses, and therapeutic decision making is obscured by multiple negative trials of iNO in acutely hypoxemic preterms (2).

Although recognized as a problem, the contributory role of PH to the preterm is uncertain. Specifically, the natural history of pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular function in preterms, thresholds at which PH is physiologically relevant, desirable target oxygen (O2) saturation, and the clinical efficacy and/or merits of iNO challenge clinicians on a daily basis. Timely diagnosis and appraisal of actual cardiovascular physiology may enable a more precise approach to treatment. The consequences may include enhanced immediate patient outcomes and possibly lower risk of neurodevelopmental impairment, however research is still needed.

Defining ph in premature infants

The precise pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) used to make the diagnosis of PH in the preterm infant is not clear, particularly in the transitional period. A mean PAP>25 mm Hg is considered abnormal for infants >3 months of life (3). A similar diagnostic threshold for preterm infants has not been studied, and the premise that a single threshold is appropriate for neonates at all gestations may be invalid. Systemic arterial pressure rises with gestational age (4); therefore, it may be reasonable to speculate that normative PAP data may be developmentally regulated. In addition there is evidence that PAP may remain at systemic or near-systemic levels in asymptomatic premature infants (5, 6). The presence of a high PVR state alone is not sufficient for the diagnosis of PH; however, if severe, the resultant low pulmonary blood flow (PBF) may cause hypoxemia, and contributes to other consequences typical of the PH phenotype (Figure 1). Failure of the normal decline in PVR to a level that is sufficient to result in adequate PBF for oxygenation, regardless of the absolute PAP, constitutes a diagnosis of acute PH (3).

Figure 1
figure 1

Cardiovascular complications associated with elevated PVR. High PVR results in reduced PBF and reduced CO. High RV afterload contributes to RV dilation and impaired systolic performance. Ao, aorta; CNS, central nervous system; CO, cardiac output; CVP, central venous pressure; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; O2, oxygen; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; PBF, pulmonary blood flow; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; RA, right atrium; rBC, right brachiocephalic artery; RV, right ventricle; SAP, systemic arterial pressure; SBF, systemic blood flow; SpO2, oxygen saturation. PA, pulmonary artery.

The incidence of PH in preterms is not clearly described, though a higher frequency than that in term infants has been suggested (7). Parenchymal disease, which is associated with the development of acute PH in term infants (8), is common in preterms, and it is possible, though not proven, that similar mechanisms are at play. In addition, the immediate postnatal period is characterized by a cascade of cardiopulmonary changes that enable successful transition of the lung from a “vasoconstricted” in utero state to a capacitance organ of gas exchange. The preparation for this process is developmentally regulated (9), suggesting that prematurity may place neonates at increased risk of impaired transition.

The clinical manifestations of acute PH are phenotypically similar to term neonates. Early refractory hypoxemia, despite effective ventilation strategies and targeted surfactant administration, may relate to extreme lung immaturity in ELBW infants; however, PH may be a contributing factor. The classic signs of oxygen lability and pre/post saturation gradient >10–15% may be present if pulmonary pressure exceeds the level of systemic pressure and fetal channels (e.g., ductus arteriosus) remain open with right-to-left shunt (10). Pre- and post-ductal saturation monitoring should be done in all hypoxic preterms by placing saturation probes on the right hand and either lower limb. A diagnosis of PH should not, however, be excluded by the absence of a saturation gradient; specifically, saturations may be equal if ductal shunt is bidirectional, or if the ductus arteriosus is already closed. Coexistent hypoxemia and clinical signs of low cardiac output (e.g., low systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and poor perfusion), should prompt consideration of PH and/or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The accuracy of blood pressure measurement in premature infants with acute PH during the immediate perinatal period is questionable, as most arterial lines are placed in the post-ductal aorta through the umbilical artery. Theoretically, in the presence of a high-volume right-to-left ductal shunt, this measurement may be a poor surrogate of pre-ductal brain perfusion pressure (Figure 2). In the setting of acute refractory hypoxemia, a high index of suspicion for acute PH is required to prompt either an echocardiography, if feasible, or a trial of pulmonary vasodilator therapy

Figure 2
figure 2

Speculative relationship between oxygen saturation and blood pressure in pre- and post-ductal circulation for preterm neonates with acute PH. The relative magnitude of the shunt is the determinant of the relationship. Unrestrictive right-to-left shunt across the PFO augments preductal cardiac output; unrestrictive right-to-left shunt across the PDA augments post-ductal cardiac output. BP, blood pressure; LVO, left ventricular output; PBF, pulmonary blood flow; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PFO, patent foramen ovale; SBF, systemic blood flow; SpO2, oxygen saturation.

A diagnosis of acute PH is typically made when the aforementioned clinical findings are associated with echocardiographical evidence of elevated PAP in relation to systemic arterial pressure. Pulmonary pressure may be estimated based on several parameters (Table 1) Extra-pulmonary right-to-left shunt across a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is indicative of PH, and it has been suggested that bidirectional shunt with >60% of systole spent with right-to-left flow is associated with suprasystemic level PAP in term newborns with PPHN, though further study is needed to validate this data (11). The presence of right-to-left shunt is not mandatory for a diagnosis of acute PH. In the absence of a PDA and/or PFO, the velocity of the regurgitant tricuspid jet and/or leftward deviation of septal motion may be used (Figure 3). Ancillary evidence of RV dilation or dysfunction and low pulmonary venous return as evidenced by low pulmonary vein, trans-mitral flow, and low-left ventricular output may be used to support the diagnosis, though it is important to consider that RV dysfunction may occur in the absence of elevated PAP and, therefore, in the absence of specific evidence of PH, these should be interpreted with caution. Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography (TnECHO), in particular, may provide invaluable insights in real-time at the bedside, although research is limited. TnECHO allows the rapid assessment of indirect measures of PVR (e.g., ratio of RV ejection time to pulmonary artery acceleration time), PAP, myocardial dysfunction, and its cardiovascular consequences (Table 1). There is limited, but increasing, reference data for measures of RV performance in the preterm infants, particularly in the transitional period (12, 13). This may enable enhanced diagnosis and recognition of cardiovascular implications, which may provide an avenue to improve therapeutic precision.

Table 1 Assessment of the right ventricle (RV)
Figure 3
figure 3

Echocardiography features associated with pulmonary hypertension. (a) Apical 4-chamber view demonstrating a dilated right atrium and right ventricle with leftward deviation of the intraventricular septum and associated under filled left ventricle. (b) Continuous wave Doppler of the tricuspid regurgitant jet measured in the parasternal long-axis plane with a peak velocity of 3.46 m/s corresponding to an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure of 48 mm Hg+right atrial pressure. (c) High-velocity right-to-left shunt across a small ductus arteriosus from a parasternal short-axis plane. (d) Parasternal short-axis view at the level of the chordae tendineae of the mitral valve demonstrating a dilated right ventricle on top with paradoxical septal motion at end-systole.

Contributors to acute hypoxemia: differential diagnosis

The ELBW neonate with severe hypoxemia, despite positive pressure ventilation and provision of 100% O2, represents a diagnostic challenge. Oxygenation depends on the adequacy of lung recruitment and respiratory function, vascular recruitment, blood flow, and cardiac status (Figure 4). Lung disease is common and may have several contributors. Particularly in the acutely hypoxic ventilated preterm infant, it is important that mechanical factors be evaluated (e.g., equipment function, endotracheal tube patency, and position) and air leak is ruled out. Parenchymal lung disease is typically associated with increased work of breathing, abnormally aerated lungs on X-ray, and poor lung compliance. Assessment of arterial CO2 is recommended as capillary and venous samples may be less reliable in the setting of poor perfusion. Importantly, lung inflation may impair gas exchange and oxygenation either through over- or under-recruitment that may independently contribute to an increase in PVR, further complicating the diagnosis and management of acute PH.

Figure 4
figure 4

Possible contributors to hypoxic respiratory failure in preterm infants. Complex pathophysiology may exist when multiple overlapping disease processes occur concurrently. There is considerable interdependency intrinsic in cardiorespiratory interactions. LV, left ventricle; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; RV, right ventricle; TAPVD, total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage; TTN, transient tachypnea of the newborn.

Though unusual, it is critical to maintain an index of suspicion for CHD as a differential diagnosis in these patients. Neonates with CHD may be born preterm without antenatal detection, and subgroups of neonates with anatomically normal hearts may also be at risk of impaired myocardial performance. In particular, infants with single ventricle physiology and/or duct-dependent systemic blood flow lesions, e.g., hypoplastic left heart syndrome and aortic stenosis may be negatively impacted by non-judicious use of pulmonary vasodilator therapy. Hypoxemia may also occur due to impaired PBF or due to reduced systemic delivery of oxygenated blood in neonates with RV and LV dysfunction, respectively. In particular, birth asphyxia (14) and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (15) have been associated with increased risk of myocardial dysfunction in preterms, independent of increased RV afterload secondary to acute PH. Immaturity may make ELBW infants especially vulnerable to LV systolic dysfunction (16, 17) and may, in vulnerable preterms, become clinically relevant.

Differentiating pre-capillary acute PH from post-capillary disease due to pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) requires echocardiography, and is clinically relevant as the management approach will differ. First, ELBW infants are at increased risk of left heart disease with diastolic dysfunction due to myocardial immaturity (18). Specifically, the preponderance of non-contractile tissue (19), relatively fewer myofibrils that are disorganized (20), and immature calcium handling systems (21) may contribute to LV diastolic dysfunction at baseline (22). Second, increased LV afterload, during transition or after the administration of exogenous vasoconstrictors, may also contribute to an increase left atrial, and therefore pulmonary venous pressure. Finally, left heart volume overload may also contribute to reduced left atrial compliance (23). Non-discriminate use of selective pulmonary vasodilators in this setting may be harmful. Specifically, a marked increase in PBF (e.g., escalating left-to-right PDA shunt) may, therefore, contribute to the development of PVH. It is unknown whether the mechanisms by which PVH contributes to secondary PAH in older patients (24) are active in preterm infants.

It may be difficult to determine the relative contributions of parenchymal, vascular, and cardiac disease in preterm neonates who have a high risk of multiple overlapping disease processes. The complexity of the cardiorespiratory system and the interrelatedness of both disease physiology and treatment make diagnostic precision important. Echocardiography is recommended for all preterm infants with HRF in the absence of parenchymal lung disease. The presence of parenchymal lung disease may modify the urgency of echocardiography; however, if accessible, imaging should be considered in preterms with ongoing severe hypoxemia despite normalization of CO2 or with clinical features of cardiovascular instability such as low SAP or poor perfusion.

Implications of high pvr on myocardial function

There is limited data specific to the impact of PVR on preterm myocardial function, though a similar decline in RV performance as in term neonates is reported (25). An understanding of the impact of PVR on the myocardium is important because it may significantly modify disease pathophysiology and in term neonates may be a predictor of poor outcome (26). Fetal myocardial performance remains stable over the latter half of pregnancy (27, 28), and animal data suggest that changes in loading conditions produce similar changes in contractility across gestations. The importance of these physiological concepts and the similarity of the disease phenotype across gestation warrants extrapolation of term data to preterms until further scientific data are available.

The fetal RV is the dominant ventricle and supplies approximately two-third of the combined cardiac output (29). There are important differences between the two ventricles related to their differing roles in utero. As compared with the LV, the fetal RV is much larger and has a higher baseline wall stress on the basis of a larger circumference-to-wall thickness ratio (30). As the fetus matures, the ventricles grow proportionally until birth when, under normal conditions, there is a rapid decline in PVR and the RV undergoes structural changes to adapt to the new lower-pressure pulmonary circuit (20, 31). If PVR does not decline normally, the RV may be exposed to excessive afterload, to which it is poorly able to adapt, and myocardial function is negatively impacted (30, 32, 33). There is also evidence of abnormal LV function in term infants with acute PH (34). The myocardium is made up of a network of continuous myocardial fibers that traverse both ventricles in a complex pattern (35); therefore, in theory, factors that negatively influence the performance of the RV may have a broader impact. Contributors to abnormal LV systolic performance include altered configuration of the septal wall (36), reduced left heart preload (37, 38), and the effects of systemic hypoxemia and hypotension on coronary oxygen delivery. The presence of fetal shunts may have a significant impact on loading conditions (Figure 2). A closing or restrictive ductus arteriosus may add to RV afterload and further compromise systolic performance. The presence of a widely patent foramen ovale may partly mitigate the impact on decreased LV preload through right-to-left shunt.

Management controversies for preterm infants with acute ph

Oxygen Saturation Targets

The insurance of adequate arterial oxygen content to maintain tissue physioxia represents the cornerstone of neonatal cardiovascular care. At term, this begins with establishing an airway and optimum lung recruitment with the therapeutic target of optimum alveolar gas content. This strategy alone may be adequate for some neonates. Thereafter, recommended therapeutic strategies are those that reduce PVR and support RV function. Although, in general, these principles appear straightforward, the implementation may be complicated.

The ideal target oxygen saturation (SpO2) for preterm neonates is unclear, particularly with acute PH. In term animal experimental models both alveolar hypoxia and hypoxemia independently stimulate pulmonary vasoconstriction (39). At arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) between 20 and 40 mm Hg there is an inverse linear relationship with PAP until reaching a plateau at 50 mm Hg PaO2, after which no further reduction in PAP occurs (40). Maturity, however, is an important modifier of this relationship. The responsiveness of the pulmonary vasculature to oxygen increases throughout gestation, with the greatest change in the third trimester (41). When exposed to hyperbaric O2, the increase in PBF of extremely preterm fetal lambs is significantly blunted, despite a similar increase in pulmonary artery O2 tension as compared with at term fetal lambs (42). The role of O2, therefore, as a pulmonary vasodilator in preterm neonates is variable and in some situations may be reduced.

In fact, provision of high concentrations of O2 in an effort to reduce PVR, may be detrimental to lung health and counterproductive in the acute management of PH. In preterm lambs, exposure to 24 h of hyperoxia is associated with lung injury and inflammation (43). Exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS) with inadequate defenses are implicated as a contributor. The antioxidant enzyme (AOE) system is immature in preterm animals and demonstrates significant maturational change (44, 45). Superoxide dismutase activity in the human fetus at 18–20 weeks GA is ~35% its term level, suggesting a similar ontogeny (46). Particularly in the immediate postnatal period, low baseline levels may make preterm neonates vulnerable to the effects of ROS, though this may be mitigated in part by antenatal corticosteroids (47).

Immaturity of the AOE response to hyperoxia may also be important. In term and near-term animals, hyperoxia upregulates AOE activity after 24–72 h of exposure to ROS (46, 48, 49). There is evidence that this response may be blunted in preterms; specifically, AOE activity is not upregulated despite hyperoxia in the preterm rabbit (48) and baboon (50), and a preterm lamb model demonstrates low AOE activity despite the presence of oxidative stress (43). In addition to cellular injury produced by excessive or prolonged exposure, ROS may negatively impact preterms with acute PH indirectly. ROS are known to combine with nitric oxide (NO) to produce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and peroxynitrite. These compounds may further augment PVR. Though preterm data are not available, peroxynitrite is associated with enhanced pulmonary vasoconstriction in term neonatal, but not in adult rat (51). Simultaneously, the resultant reduction in the bioavailability of endogenously produced NO may actually augment vasoconstriction (43).

In practice it may be difficult to determine the optimum PaO2 to balance the beneficial effects on PVR with the adverse consequences of oxidative stress. Nevertheless, while it is important to maintain tissue oxygenation and healthy cellular metabolic homeostasis, avoidance of hyperoxia is an important consideration. Based on the higher affinity of fetal hemoglobin for O2 (52), a target SpO2 between 90 and 95% to maintain a PaO2 in the 50–70 mm Hg range may be prudent. In the presence of an oxygen saturation gradient, preductal saturation should be used to guide O2 therapy, as this represents the O2 delivery to the brain. An effort to increase the postductal saturation by providing high concentration of FiO2 is not recommended, as there is likely to be limited supplemental pulmonary vasodilation and production of additional ROS. On the contrary, randomized trials of oxygen target saturation for all-comer preterms have shown that lower target saturations (85–90%) are associated with an increased risk of mortality, further complicating the dilemma (53, 54).

Approach to Respiratory Support

Optimal lung recruitment is an important component of treatment of acute PH. In an isolated perfused lung experimental model, the relationship between PVR and lung volume shows a hysteresis curve similar to the relationship between airway pressure and volume. With lung inflation there is a modest increase in PVR with a steeper decline in deflation (55). Below closing volume, however, deflation increases PVR. Respiratory distress syndrome is associated with reduced functional residual capacity, which may lower the closing volume (56, 57). In these patients, recruitment alone or in combination with surfactant therapy may increase functional residual capacity and reduce PVR (57). For preterm infants with HRF in the setting of respiratory distress syndrome, surfactant should be administered as a first-line therapy. For infants who remain hypoxic after surfactant in whom PH is either suspected or proven, caution is advised when considering additional surfactant doses as its delivery may cause transient airway obstruction and impair alveolar ventilation (58). Reactive vasoconstriction, in theory, may precipitate acute pulmonary hypertensive crisis, which may contribute to prolonged hypoxia (58).

The “open-lung” ventilation strategy, characterized by using positive end-expiratory pressure and relatively small tidal volumes following a recruitment maneuver to open collapsed lung units and optimize functional residual capacity, is widely utilized with a goal of minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. No specific mode of ventilation has consistently demonstrated superiority; however, irrespective of the mode, avoidance of under-recruitment or hyperinflation is important. When lung volume is excessive, airway pressure exerts a compressive force against the capillaries within respiratory units and is associated with increasing PVR (59), reduced PBF (60), reduced LV end-diastolic volume, (61) LV stroke volume (61), and reduced systemic perfusion (62).

The clinical challenge, particularly with the use of high-frequency ventilation, is to determine when the optimum lung volume has been achieved. Increasing mean airway pressure and lung volume are strongly associated. Owing to highly variable patient-related factors (e.g., lung compliance), predicting lung volume on the basis of mean airway pressure alone in preterms is not reliable (63). Commonly used radiological markers (e.g., diaphragm position relative to posterior ribs) lack precision (64). Though oxygenation is a useful surrogate marker of recruitment in animal (65) and neonatal studies (66, 67), it may be unreliable in neonates with acute PH. In addition, V/Q mismatch may not be corrected by improved alveolar aeration and over-distension may further compromise hemodynamics. Regular assessment of lung compliance is recommended, and a high index of suspicion for over-distension is warranted. TnECHO assessment of RV output, which declines with increasing distending pressure, may provide additional insight, though further study is required to identify if a predictable threshold exists (68, 69). Indices of left heart filling and inferior vena cava distensibility may provide additional insights, but there is limited data regarding their validity.

The role of iNO is established in term and near-term neonates with PPHN (1), but remains controversial in preterm infants with acute PH. Several randomized trials of rescue iNO vs. placebo have enrolled patients on the basis of respiratory illness severity alone without confirming the presence or absence of PH on echocardiography. These trials, however, were not designed to investigate the role of iNO as a pulmonary vasodilator in acute PH. Inclusion criteria, disease severity and primary outcome were variable and echocardiography-proven PH was reported infrequently, which contributes to clinical uncertainty as to the impact of iNO therapy on illness severity and outcome measures (Table 2). The relatively high cost of iNO delivery systems creates an additional layer of complexity in many healthcare environments as there may be financial disincentives to its use without a clear expectation of its benefit. There are anecdotal reports of American insurance payers declining to cover the cost of iNO delivery to preterm infants, citing the lack of evidence of benefit. In some centers, stewardship programs have been instituted and, though “appropriate use” is the goal, an emphasis on avoidance of cost may lead to pressure on clinicians to strive for “minimum use”. A thoughtful appraisal of the literature is warranted to guide clinical decision-making and direct policy-makers. The extrapolation of the results of these trials to conclude that there is no role for iNO in the management of preterm neonates with acute PH in the presence of high PVR represents a physiological oversimplification.

Table 2 Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of nitric oxide for early rescue therapy of hypoxic respiratory failure in preterm infants.

Evidence from moderately preterm animal models supports a reduction in pulmonary vascular tone (70) with augmentation of PBF and improved oxygenation in response to exogenous NO (71). Several human clinical trials of iNO have reported improved oxygenation in hypoxic preterms as compared with controls (72, 73, 74, 75), though this effect is not consistent across all populations reported, which may relate to phenotypic variability in the patients selected. The modulators of iNO responsiveness in preterm infants have not been firmly established, though larger birth weight (76) and older gestational age (7, 77) have been suggested as predictors of positive response. The published data exploring the relationship between PH and iNO response are limited to observational data (7, 78). In selected populations presenting with HRF and a high pre-test probability of abnormal PVR, such as those with prolonged oligohydramnios, iNO is effective regardless of gestational age (79, 80, 81). A recent retrospective cohort study suggests that the response rate to iNO in preterm infants with echocardiography-proven PH in the first 72 h of life is comparable to term data and independent of gestational age (82).

The use of iNO in an unselected population without the use of echocardiography, however, may be dangerous. Before considering iNO therapy, it is important to consider the cardiovascular implications of a potentially marked change in PBF. For example, confirmation of normal LV systolic performance is essential as theoretically, in patients with significant LV systolic dysfunction, the right-to-left ductal shunt is a major determinant of the adequacy of systemic blood flow (SBF). Indiscriminate use of iNO may precipitate cardiogenic shock by reversing the transductal shunt, and increasing PBF at the expense of SBF. These patients may be identified by comprehensive echocardiography evaluation of LV performance and shunt physiology; specifically, the coexistence of right-to-left PDA shunt and left-to-right transatrial shunt in patients with moderate to severe LV dysfunction may represent an alternative physiology. The clinical assessment of this patient population may be challenging due to the presence of a pre-/post-ductal oxygen saturation difference. Careful evaluation of the effect of oxygen may provide some physiologic insight as these patients are likely to have relatively normal pre-ductal oxygen saturation in room air. We recommend judicious use of iNO in these patients, early post-intervention echocardiography, and immediate discontinuation of iNO in patients with either a lack of improvement in oxygenation or deterioration in clinical indices of systemic perfusion. Preterm neonates with a PDA need to be monitored carefully after iNO administration, as they are at increased risk of pulmonary hemorrhage (83) as a manifestation of a rapid reduction of PVR due to escalating left-to-right shunt; similarly, the marked change from a hypoxemic, low-cardiac output state to a state of normoxia or hyperoxia with high-cardiac output due to PDA shunt, may predispose neonates to cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (84). Further studies are needed to delineate these risks and close monitoring is advised. Early echocardiography after iNO initiation may be particularly useful to monitor the evolution of the disease and response to treatment, particularly in patients with LV dysfunction. Rapid improvement in oxygenation (e.g., 30 min) has been reported in both preterm animal (71) and human studies (74, 85).

The appropriate starting dose and duration of iNO after a clinical response may, theoretically, require modification based on the unique characteristics of preterm circulation. Animal studies suggest a dose–response relationship between 5 and 20 p.p.m. of iNO (71), however, there are no human preterm pharmacokinetics studies, and there is insufficient data to determine superiority of one regime (e.g., starting at 5 p.p.m. and increasing) over another (e.g., starting at 20 p.p.m. and then weaning). Similarly, there is no standard approach to weaning, and on both subjects the published literature varies widely (Table 2). Modification of guidelines to reflect these unique physiological vulnerabilities (e.g., IVH, pulmonary hemorrhage) may be necessary, though there is no concrete scientific evidence to support this in practice. As PAP and PVR decline, progressive pulmonary edema and O2 stress may further contribute to adverse pulmonary outcomes. The relationship of iNO to free radical production in human neonates is unclear. There is biological evidence that ROS are constitutively produced by cellular sources; however, when combined with O2, NO creates supra-physiologic levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and peroxynitrite (86). In acutely unwell neonates, reduction in ROS may offset NO2 effects. Excessive or prolonged exposure may cause cellular injury and compromise cell growth (86). Given the body of evidence advocating against the use of iNO routinely in the prevention of preterm morbidities, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia (2), avoidance of exposure to iNO beyond the period required to reverse abnormal PVR and its consequences is recommended. Once oxygenation has improved, the continued role of iNO is questionable and early weaning and discontinuation should be considered.

The impact of acute rescue therapy with iNO on survival and preterm morbidity is, however, conflicting. Some studies have suggested that iNO treatment may be associated with complications such as IVH (87) and higher oxygen dependency (88), whereas others report reduced incidence of IVH and mortality (75). Preterm infants with prolonged oligohydramnios who receive iNO treatment, however, have improved oxygenation and lower mortality (89). The fact that randomized controlled trials have shown no consistent benefit in terms of mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or IVH (2) is not unexpected given the complexity of the disease physiology and variability in treatment approach. The subclinical existence of alternative disease states (e.g., LV dysfunction), which may represent a contraindication to treatment and failure to stratify for response, may also confound the results. Recent observational data demonstrated that iNO responders (vs. non-responders) may have improved disability-free survival, suggesting that responsiveness may have prognostic implications (). Survivors may also have a reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and severe brain injury (80), though it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions based on retrospective data and small sample sizes. A significant limitation of many studies attempting to address this question is lack of accurate physiological clarity. In the absence of echocardiography documentation of disease physiology and rigorous diagnostic criteria for acute PH, it is difficult to draw conclusions as to the potential impact on outcome. There is no randomized controlled trial of acute rescue iNO therapy for preterm infants with echocardiography-confirmed PH. Given the low disease frequency within individual centers, such a trial would be extremely difficult to undertake and would necessitate a large multi-center design. In addition, therapeutic efficacy is likely dependent on a variety of cardiovascular and respiratory confounders, the approach to which would be difficult to standardize across multiple individual practitioners.

Despite the limitations of the current body of literature, a trial of iNO is strongly recommended for preterm infants with echocardiography-confirmed PH and severe hypoxemia, despite optimum management of lung disease (3). A history of prolonged oligohydramnios may strengthen the likelihood of benefit, however, whether this effect represents enhanced responsiveness or improved diagnostic precision is unclear. Its use should be avoided in patients with significant LV dysfunction and the use of the lowest required dose and duration are prudent to minimize the risks of IVH, pulmonary hemorrhage, oxidative stress, and ductal physiology. Close physiological monitoring including serial echocardiography is highly recommended.

The role of alternative pulmonary vasodilators in this population is unclear with limited published evidence. Sildenafil is a non-selective phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor used to treat acute PH and/or RV dysfunction with evidence of benefit in term infants with PPHN. There are reports of reduced OI after administration of both intravenous and oral sildenafil to a heterogeneous group of preterms with HRF (91, 92); however, both safety and efficacy data are extremely limited. An association between sildenafil and retinopathy of prematurity has been proposed on the basis of a biologically plausible connection between PDE-5 inhibition and NO-mediated vasoproliferation in the retina (93, 94, 95). It is difficult, however, to separate the impact of sildenafil from concurrent neonatal risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity (e.g., significant O2 exposure, PDA ligation) in reported cases. A few small human studies suggest no increased risk (96, 97) and O2-mediated neovascularization is reduced by sildenafil administration in a mouse model (98). In sick preterms with concurrent cardiovascular instability, the non-specific vasodilator effects on systemic blood pressure also merit consideration. Oral sildenafil use for PH has been associated with severe hypotension in extreme preterm neonates (99). Drug levels achieved intravenously change markedly in term neonates over the first week of life (100). Preterm pharmacokinetics have not been studied, however, there is likely significant heterogeneity due to changes in the cytochrome P450 enzyme system with ontogeny (101), and there is high risk for drug–drug interactions with similarly metabolized agents (e.g., fluconazole, caffeine, phenobarbital) (102). The use of sildenafil as an alternative to iNO is not currently recommended, and its use as an adjunctive agent has not been adequately studied in preterm infants.

Milrinone (phosphodiesterase-3, PDE-3 inhibitor) mediates vascular smooth muscle vasodilation through an increase in cyclic AMP (103). In mature patients, milrinone provides positive inotropy and reduces both systemic vascular resistance and PVR (104). In adult animals there is benefit to combination therapy with iNO, which may be related to synergy between upregulation of the cAMP and cGMP pathways (105). Preterm data are sparse and inotropic properties may be questionable. Prophylactic milrinone was ineffective at preventing low systemic blood flow in a heterogeneous population of ELBW neonates during the transitional period. These data are difficult to interpret for the following reasons: first, the etiology of low superior vena cava (SVC) flow was not defined, making it difficult to extrapolate to the preterm with acute PH (106); second, the accuracy of superior vena cava flow as a measurement of systemic blood flow has been questioned in a comparative evaluation with cardiac MRI (107); finally, data from neonatal experimental models also suggest that milrinone may not be efficacious as a positive inotrope in preterms. Milrinone acts, in part, through sarcoplasmic reticulum-dependent modulation of calcium and, therefore, is less efficacious in models where sarcoplasmic reticulum is absent or underdeveloped, such as the immature neonate (108, 109). Afterload reduction through PVR may be the primary driver of its proposed efficacy in acute PH. In preterm infants, born at a gestational age between 26 and 31 weeks with echocardiography-confirmed PH, intravenous milrinone has been associated with reduced OI, lower iNO requirement, and improved markers of RV systolic performance (25). Some authors recommend the use of milrinone in neonates with acute PH and LV dysfunction (3). This approach may be advantageous if systemic arterial pressure is normal due to the favorable impact of milrinone on RV afterload, RV function, and LV loading conditions (increased preload, reduced afterload). This approach is not without risk, due to the lack of certainty regarding the positive inotropic properties of milrinone in ELBW infants particularly in the transitional period. In addition, milrinone administration to patients with severe LV dysfunction, where the systemic circulation maybe duct-dependent, may cause negative physiologic effects. Specifically, the non-selective vasodilator effects of milrinone lead to a reduction in PVR and increased left heart preload, which may be poorly tolerated resulting in pulmonary edema, and a reduction in cardiac output and SAP (25). Though post-ductal organ perfusion may be augmented by right-to-left ductal shunt in the setting of preserved RV function and elevated PVR, coronary, and cerebral perfusion may be negatively impacted if afterload reduction leads to hypotension and poor perfusion pressure. Moderate dose infusion (0.5 mcg/kg/min) has been associated with hypotension in 45% of patients (106). This is particularly important as the half-life of milrinone may be substantially longer in ELBW (110) as compared with term (111) neonates (10 vs. 4 h, respectively). The evidence for other non-selective pulmonary vasodilators (e.g., bosentan (112), prostacyclin analogues (113, 114, 115)) in acute PH is extremely limited and their use as iNO alternatives is not recommended.

Therapy for Hemodynamic Instability

Treatment of preterm neonates with acute PH should consider the underlying pathophysiology (Figure 5), as cardiotropic medications may exacerbate HRF if the effects on PVR are not considered. Specific evidence for the use of individual cardiovascular agents in preterm infants with acute PH is limited, and extrapolation from term and animal data is required. Though commonly used, dopamine and epinephrine have been shown to increase both systemic vascular resistance and PVR (116), and therefore may not be ideal in this population. Dopamine in particular increases PAP to a greater extent than SAP (117) through greater vasoconstriction in the pulmonary vasculature (118). There are no clinical trials of either agent in neonates with acute PH, therefore, these should be used judiciously with careful evaluation of the clinical impact. For neonates with acute PH and systemic hypotension, alternative cardiovascular agents such as vasopressin and norepinephrine warrant consideration as their biological properties may be more favorable. Vasopressin, a potent systemic vasoconstrictor has been successfully used to treat hypotension in preterm neonates (119, 120). In the pulmonary circulation, vasopressin acts through endothelial receptors to increase the release of NO and vasodilates the pulmonary vasculature (121). Data suggesting clinical efficacy are emerging in preterms with acute PH that merits further study (122). Norepinephrine use is also supported by very limited neonatal evidence, however, in animal models it may reduce PVR (123) and support RV function (124), particularly under hypoxic conditions (125). The evidence in term neonates that norepinephrine may improve oxygenation and cardiac output warrants exploration in preterms (126).

Figure 5
figure 5

Suggested management algorithm for the preterm infant presenting with HRF. HRF, hypoxemic respiratory failure; iNO, inhaled nitric oxide; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; R/O, rule out; RV, right ventricle; SVR, systemic vascular resistance.

For neonates with myocardial dysfunction, dobutamine is an inodilator agent (agonist at cardiac α1 and β1 receptors (127)) with positive inotropic properties and has been shown to increase cardiac output in preterm neonates with low SBF (128). In patients with systemic hypotension, however, epinephrine may be advantageous at doses less likely to cause pulmonary vasoconstriction. Though perhaps counterintuitive in the preterm, treatment with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2, alprostadil) for refractory hypoxemia or compromised SBF, where RV systolic performance is severely impaired and the PDA is small or restrictive, may be advantageous. In this setting, right-to-left ductal shunt may augment post-ductal cardiac output and improve organ perfusion (129) Though the PaO2 is lower, it may be sufficient to prevent anaerobic metabolism and organ ischemia. The beneficial effects for the RV include afterload reduction due to run-off into the systemic circulation and the vasodilator properties of PGE2 may reduce PVR (130).

TnECHO assessment is recommended in the management of all preterm infants with suspected PH and cardiovascular instability. The ability to provide non-invasive longitudinal data may allow for greater therapeutic precision, in particular more comprehensive evaluation of the merits or unintended consequences of cardiovascular support. Newer techniques such as tissue Doppler imaging and myocardial strain measurement may provide novel insights regarding the impact of elevated PVR on RV function and their relationship to neonatal outcomes; however, these techniques require prospective validation.

Conclusion

Though increasingly recognized as an important contributor to hypoxia and acute cardiovascular instability, the optimum care for premature neonates with acute PH remains poorly understood and controversial. It is a complex and heterogeneous disease that requires a high index of suspicion to identify and meticulous attention to detail to optimize management. Enhanced understanding of physiology may aid in the interpretation of conflicting literature and should inform clinical practice. Appropriate patient selection is of paramount importance, as there is likely a population of preterm neonates who benefit from iNO as an acute rescue therapy after alveolar aeration and recruitment strategies are optimized. Comprehensive TnECHO evaluation may provide an enhanced understanding of mechanism of disease, facilitate earlier identification of a target population where early intervention may be beneficial, and exclude confounding illnesses (e.g., CHD, LV dysfunction) where non-judicious use of iNO or alternative pulmonary vasodilators may be harmful. A thoughtful, physiological, and targeted approach to therapy may improve patient outcomes and provide direction for future clinical trials.