Main

The DA is widely patent in the fetus, and constricts soon after birth (1). Mechanisms of fetal patency and neonatal constriction of the DA are controversial (2–4). Low Po2 and prostaglandins dilate the fetal DA (2–4). Momma and Toyono (5) showed that NO is a major dilator of the ductus in the preterm fetus. Nakanishi et al.(6) showed increased intracellular calcium of the ductal smooth muscle when constricted by increased oxygen. Coceani and Kelsey (7) suggested a specific role of ET as a mediator of fetal ductal constriction. Their recent study has shown that deletion of the ET-A receptor suppresses oxygen-induced constriction but not postnatal closure of the DA (8). Among four ET, including ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and ET-4, ET-1 is produced in the vascular endothelium, and induces transient vasodilatation through the ET-B receptor and prolonged vasoconstriction by binding to the ET-A receptor of vascular smooth muscle cells (9, 10). Recently, potent mixed and selective ET-A and ET-B blockers have been developed (9, 10), including bosentan (mixed blocker) (11, 12) and CI 1020 (ET-A blocker) (13–15). The present study was done to prove the role of endogenous ET in fetal ductal constriction in an in vivo study. Three categories of medication can constrict the fetal DA in rats, and are used to induce fetal ductal constriction in this study. These include cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as indomethacin (16), inhibitors of NO synthase such as l-NAME (5), and glucocorticoid hormones such as dexamethasone (17). Combined administration of indomethacin and l-NAME induces strong fetal ductal constriction (5), and this combination was also used in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.

Virgin Wistar rats (pregnancy period 21.5 d) were mated overnight from 1700 to 0900 h; the presence of sperm in vaginal smears indicated d 0 of pregnancy. Rats were housed in an environmentally controlled room, acclimatized to a 12 h light-dark cycle, and maintained on commercial solid food and tap water ad libitum. Treatment conformed to the guiding principles of the American Physiologic Society. The experiment was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experiments of the Institute. Experiments were done either on fetal d 21 (near-term rats) or on fetal d 19 (preterm rats).

Ductus-constricting drugs.

Administration of 10 mg/kg of indomethacin to near-term rats induces severe ductal constriction persisting 4–8 h (16), and this is used to study ductus-relaxing effects of bosentan. Indomethacin (1 mg/kg) combined with l-NAME, a NO inhibitor (10 mg/kg) (5), induces severe ductal constriction in the near-term rats, and this combination was also used. Administration of 10 mg/kg l-NAME to preterm rats causes severe ductal constriction, and was used in other fetuses. Glucocorticoid hormone constricts the fetal DA, mildly in the near-term fetus and moderately in the preterm fetus (17), so dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) was also used to constrict the fetal ductus of preterm rats in this study.

ET receptor antagonists.

We used bosentan (Ro 47–0203, Actelion Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) to block ET receptors (ET-A and ET-B). Bosentan is a dual ET receptor blocker, and is effective in blocking ET-A and ET-B after oral and intravascular administration (11, 12). Effects persist more than 4 h (11, 12). We used CI-1020 (Pfizer, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.) to block ET-A receptor. CI-1020 is a selective ET-A receptor blocker, and effective in blocking ET-A after oral administration (13–15).

Drug administration.

Indomethacin (Sumitomo Chemical Co., Osaka, Japan), 1 or 10 mg/kg, was administered to the pregnant rat through an orogastric tube in a suspension with 1 mL water containing 5% arabic gum at 0900 h on d 21 of pregnancy.

l-NAME (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.), 10 mg/kg, was dissolved in 1 mL of physiologic saline and injected intramuscularly into the dorsum of the pregnant rat at 0900 on d 21 of pregnancy. Bosentan (11, 12), 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 mg/kg, was dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO and injected intraperitoneally at 0900 h. Dexamethasone sodium phosphate (2 mg in 0.5 mL, Nippon Merck-Banyu, Tokyo, Japan) was injected in a dose of 1 mg/kg into the dorsum of the pregnant rat at 0900 on d 19 of pregnancy.

Measurements.

To study in situ morphology of the fetal DA, a rapid whole-body freezing method was used as described in earlier studies (17–19). Briefly, fetuses were delivered by cesarean section with atlas dislocation of the mother rats, and frozen immediately in acetone cooled to −80°C by dry ice. Body weight of the frozen fetus was measured. Seven or 8 fetuses were studied in each litter. The frozen thorax was cut on a freezing microtome (Komatsu Solidate Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in the frontal plane, and the inner diameters of the ascending aorta, main pulmonary artery and DA were measured every 100 μm in 10–15 planes with a microscope (Nikon Binocular Stereoscopic Microscope, Nihon Kogaku Co., Tokyo, Japan) and a micrometer (Nikon Ocular Micrometer, Nihon Kogaku Co.) (Fig. 1). Constriction of the fetal ductus was not uniform, but most severe at the aortic end (19) (Fig. 2). The narrowest ductal diameter was used as the indicator of constriction.

Figure 1
figure 1

Frontal sections of the near-term DA in the control fetus (A); in the fetus 4 h after administration of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) (B); and in the fetus 4 h after administration of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) and bosentan (100 mg/kg) (C). The ductus is widely open in the control fetus, and constricted with indomethacin (B). The ductal constriction with indomethacin is attenuated by bosentan in C. AoA, aortic arch;LA, left atrium;LPA, left pulmonary artery;LSVC, left superior vena cava;RPA, right pulmonary artery;SVC, superior vena cava.

Figure 2
figure 2

Sagittal sections of the fetal DA in near-term rats. The ductus is widely open in the control (A). It is constricted 4 h after administration of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) (B). Ductal constriction is prevented at 4 h after combined administration of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) and bosentan (10 mg/kg) (C). DAo, descending aorta;MPA, main pulmonary artery;RV, right ventricle. Others are the same as in Figure 1.

Protocol.

The following studies were done using one or two pregnant rats for each drug combination, time and dose. Eight fetuses were studied from each litter. More rats were studied if measurements in fetuses showed large variations. The effects of mixed blocker (bosentan) were studied in the following six studies:

  1. 1

    The time course of vasodilating effects of bosentan was studied after administration of bosentan (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats, and measured 1, 4, and 8 h later. The effects of an additional larger dose (100 mg/kg) of bosentan at 4 h were also studied.

  2. 2

    The time course of effect of bosentan (10 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied at 1, 4, and 8 h after administration of these drugs. As a control, the time course of ductus-constricting effect of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) was studied at 1, 4, and 8 h after administration to near-term rats.

  3. 3

    The dose-response curve of bosentan (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied at 4 h after administration.

  4. 4

    To study the dilating effect of bosentan to the already constricted ductus, the dose-response curve of bosentan (0.1, 1, 10, 100 mg/kg) administered 4 h after administration of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied for an additional 4 h (8 h after administration of indomethacin).

  5. 5

    To study the dilating effect of bosentan on the preterm ductus, the dose-response curve of bosentan (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) to preterm rats was studied 4 h after administration.

  6. 6

    To study the dilating effect of bosentan on the preterm ductus, the dose-response curve of bosentan (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with l-NAME (10 mg/kg) to preterm rats was studied 4 h after administration. The effects of a large dose (100 mg/kg) of bosentan alone to the preterm ductus were studied after 4 h.

    The effects of ET-A blocker (CI-1020) were evaluated in the following four studies:

  7. 7

    The time course of effect of CI-1020 (10 mg/kg) administered to near-term rats was studied at 1, 4, and 8 hours after its administration.

  8. 8

    The time course of effect of CI-1020 (10 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied at 1, 4, and 8 h.

  9. 9

    The dose-response curve of CI-1020 (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied at 4 h.

  10. 10

    The dose-response curve of CI-1020 (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mg/kg) administered simultaneously with indomethacin (1 mg/kg) and l-NAME (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats was studied at 4 h.

Photographs.

The sagittal section of the DA was photographed to demonstrate ductal constriction with a binocular stereoscopic microscope (Wild M400 Photomacroscope, Wild Heerbrugg AG, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) using color film (Reale, Fuji Film Co., Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 2).

Statistics.

The results were expressed as mean ± SEM. The statistical significance of differences between group means was determined by ANOVA and the Bonferroni method (20). The difference was considered to be significant if the p value was <0.05.

RESULTS

The fetal DA was widely patent and the inner diameter was 0.8 mm in fetuses without medication (Figs. 1–3, Table 1). After administration of bosentan, the fetal ductus and pulmonary artery dilated significantly (Fig. 3, Table 1).

Figure 3
figure 3

Time course of ductus-dilating effect of bosentan (10 mg/kg i.p.), ductus-constricting effect of indomethacin (10 mg/kg p.o.), and effect of simultaneous administration of these two drugs in near-term rats. Bosentan alone dilated the fetal ductus by 20% at 8 h after administration. Bosentan inhibited ductal constriction by indomethacin partially at 1 h, but more completely 4 and 8 h. Numbers of studied fetuses are shown in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 vs without ET blocker.

Table 1 Dilatation of the DA, ascending aorta, and the main pulmonary artery by endothelin blockers 4 h after administration in fetal rats

As shown in Figure 3, bosentan reversed fetal ductal constriction by indomethacin after simultaneous administration, partially at 1 h and more completely at 4 and 8 h.

As shown in Figure 4, administration of a large dose of indomethacin (10 mg/kg) to near-term rats constricted the fetal ductus severely, and inner diameter decreased to 0.2 mm (Fig. 4). Bosentan dose-dependently inhibited fetal ductal constriction induced by a large dose of indomethacin (Fig. 4). Bosentan administered simultaneously with indomethacin inhibited fetal ductal constriction more effectively than later administration, in contrast to when the fetal ductus had been previously constricted by indomethacin (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effects of bosentan in inhibition of near-term ductal constriction by indomethacin. Dose-response curve at 4 h after administration. Bosentan, 10 and 100 mg/kg, dilated the ductus to 110% and 120% significantly. Inhibitory effect of bosentan was more complete with simultaneous administration. With late administration, the reversing effect of bosentan was less complete. Numbers of studied fetuses are shown in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 vs without ET blocker.

Constriction of the preterm DA by dexamethasone or l-NAME was inhibited by bosentan dose-dependently (Fig. 5). A larger dose (100 mg/kg) of bosentan inhibited fetal ductal constriction completely.

Figure 5
figure 5

Effects of bosentan in inhibition of preterm ductal constriction by dexamethasone (1 mg/kg i.m.), and l-NAME (10 mg/kg i.m.). Dose-response curves at 4 h after simultaneous administration. Bosentan, 100 mg/kg, inhibited the ductus-constricting effects of dexamethasone and l-NAME, and dilated the ductus completely. Numbers of studied fetuses are shown in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 vs without ET blocker.

The ductus-dilating effects of ET-A blocker CI-1020 are shown in Table 1 and Figure 6 and 7. CI-1020, 10 mg/kg, significantly dilated the DA by 25%, the pulmonary artery by 16%, and the ascending aorta by 13% (Table 1). CI-1020, 10 mg/kg, effectively reversed ductal constriction by indomethacin when simultaneously administered (Figs. 6 and 7). Dilating effects were more complete at 4 and 8 h after administration (Fig. 6). Dose-response curves of simultaneously administered CI-1020 with indomethacin (10 mg/kg) and indomethacin (1 mg/kg) plus l-NAME (10 mg/kg) showed maximum effect at 1 and 10 mg/kg, and ductus diameters were in the range of 0.70–0.78 mm (Fig. 7). These ductus diameters were close to the diameter before any drug was given (0.80 mm), but smaller than the diameter after administration of CI-1020 (0.96 mm).

Figure 6
figure 6

Time course of ductus-dilating effect of ET-A blocker CI-1020 (10 mg/kg i.p.), ductus-constricting effect of indomethacin (10 mg/kg p.o.), and effect of simultaneous administration of these two drugs in near-term rats. CI 1020 dilated the fetal ductus by 20% at 4 h after administration. CI-1020 inhibited ductal constriction by indomethacin partially initially, but more completely 4 and 8 h later. Numbers of studied fetuses are shown in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 vs without ET blocker.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of ET-A blocker CI-1020 on inhibition of ductal constriction by indomethacin (1 mg/kg p.o.) and l-NAME (10 mg/kg i.p.), and indomethacin (10 mg/kg p.o.) in near-term fetal rats on fetal d 21. Dose-response curves at 4 h after simultaneous drug administration. Fetal ductal constriction was effectively reversed with 1 and 10 mg/kg of CI-1020, and ductal diameter returned to 0.70 and 0.78 mm, respectively. These diameters were not significantly smaller than the diameter with no drug, but smaller than the diameter with CI-1020 (0.96 mm). Numbers of studied fetuses are shown in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 vs without ET blocker.

DISCUSSION

Experimentally, inhibition of cyclooxygenase and NO synthase can constrict the near-term and preterm DA, singly or in combination, indicating the dilating effects of prostaglandins and NO (1, 5, 21). The fetal DA is most relaxed in low environmental oxygen tension of around 20 mm Hg (1). Clinical mechanism of fetal ductal constriction remain highly controversial.

Coceani and Kelsey (7) presented in vitro evidence that ET-1 is a mediator of fetal and neonatal ductal constriction. In their study, ET-1 is synthesized by the fetal DA and the amount of ET increased slightly in higher-oxygen than in low-oxygen media. They showed that ET-1 blocker partially relaxed the ductus constricted by high oxygen (7). However, Fineman et al.(22) showed in fetal and neonatal lambs that ET-A blocker (CI 1020) blocked both in vivo and in vitro effects of endogenous ET-1, but had no effect on postnatal ductus constriction nor on in vitro ductus contractile response to oxygen or indomethacin. In addition, Chatfield et al.(23) could not induce constriction of the fetal DA by ET-1 in an in vitro study. Therefore, the role of ET-1 mediating fetal ductal constriction is controversial.

The present study is the first in vivo study showing the role of ET-1 as a mediator of fetal ductal constriction. Bosentan is a potent dual blocker of ET receptors (11, 12). It is effective in reducing blood pressure after both intravenous and oral administration (11, 12). Although its fetal plasma concentrations were not measured, its transplacental transfer to the fetus is evident by its blocking effects on fetal ductal constriction in our experiments. Maximum blocking effects on ET were obtained by intravenous injection of 30 mg/kg of bosentan (11, 12). Transplacental effects in the fetal ductus after intraperitoneal injection in the mother rat was maximum at 100 mg/kg in this study. This dose is three times larger than the intravenous dose. This difference may be the result of the placental barrier.

In this study, the inhibitory effect of bosentan on fetal ductal constriction was most effective with simultaneous administration with indomethacin, but less effective with late administration. This difference the result of the known firm affinity and prolonged attachment of ET to the receptors (9).

Bosentan is a mixed blocker of ET-A and ET-B receptor, and the ET-A blocking effect is dominant over the ET-B blocking effect (12–15). CI-1020 is a selective blocker of ET-A receptor (12), and its potent blocking effect on fetal ductal constriction in this study shows the ET and ET-A receptor as major mechanisms of pharmacologically induced fetal ductal constriction.

In this in vivo study, the role of endogenous ET in fetal ductal constriction in response to indomethacin, l-NAME, and dexamethasone was evident. Clinically, fetal ductal constriction may be elicited by indomethacin administered to the pregnant woman for tocolysis (24). An ET-1 blocker such as bosentan can be used for inhibition of fetal ductal constriction. A similar clinical situation with fetal ductal constriction is seen with maternally administered glucocorticoid hormone (25).

The mechanism of fetal ductal constriction by maternally administered glucocorticoid hormones is speculative. Glucocorticoids release vascular ET (26, 27), and the mechanism of hypertension associated with therapeutic use of glucocorticoids hormones is attributed to this effect. Results of the present study showing blocking effects of bosentan to ductal constriction by dexamethasone are compatible with this ET-releasing effect of glucocorticoids.

Potential secondary effects of ET blockers on maternal and placental hemodynamics and prostaglandin production are not determined in this study. These secondary factors may explain presented results, but remain to be studied in larger animals.

The relevance of the present findings to physiologic closure of the ductus is not clear. It would be more physiologically relevant to test the effectiveness of ETA receptor blockade on ductal potency in the immediate postnatal period when the ductus normally constricts, and this remains to be studied.

Ductal constriction was observed clinically in fetuses with complete transposition of the great arteries who develop pulmonary vascular obstruction and neonatal death (28). An ET blocker such as bosentan may be effective therapeutically to dilate the fetal DA in such a condition. Bosentan is registered for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (29–31) and can be given safely to children. Whether bosentan is a novel treatment of persistence of the fetal circulation and abnormal closure of the DA (e.g. after antiinflammatory drug administration to the mother) remains to be determined.